St Catherine's C C Of Fostoria

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 46.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.483 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility incident report, review of a staff statement, review of hospital reports, review of a weather report, interviews with staff and Family Member #240, and review of the policy on elopement, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #01, who had mild cognitive impairment with recent increased confusion due to a urinary tract infection, from leaving the facility unsupervised and unknown to staff. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into the elopement incident. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm and/or negative health outcomes when on 01/17/24, sometime after 10:45 P.M., Resident #01 eloped from the facility unsupervised and unknown to staff and was discovered by chance when a pharmacy delivery driver who arrived at the facility around 10:55 P.M. found the resident locked outside the facility and bleeding from the hand while standing on the porch.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, label, date, and maintain food in a manner to prevent contamination and spoilage in accordance with acceptable food safety practices. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, as all facility residents received food prepared and distributed from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 52. Findings include: During a tour of the facility kitchen on 03/23/26 at 8:05 A.M., 10 four-ounce containers of cucumber and tomato salad were observed in the kitchen's free-standing refrigerator that were unlabeled and undated with the date of preparation. An approximately one-half full, three-quart container of ketchup was also observed to be unlabeled and undated with the date opened.Interview on 03/23/26 at 8:06 A.M. with Nutrition Services Assistant (NSA) #210 verified the 10 four-ounce containers of cucumber and tomato salad were unlabeled and undated. NSA #210 stated the items were prepared on 03/20/26. NSA #210 also verified the three-quart container of ketchup was one-half full…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of facility shower schedule, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was not dependent on staff for activities of daily living received bathing services as scheduled. This affected one resident (#44) of three residents (#30, #41, and #44) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 52. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 01/29/26 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, hypokalemia, hypertension (HTN), anxiety, depression, other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), cervical spinal stenosis, obstructive sleep apnea, abnormal weight loss, solitary pulmonary nodule, attention and concentration deficit, frontal lobe and executive function deficit, palpitations, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/10/26, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with personal hygiene to maintain grooming and cleanliness for one resident (#41) of three residents (#30, #41, and #44) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 52. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 05/06/20 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Type Two Diabetes Mellitus (DM2), vascular dementia, aphasia following cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), epilepsy, atrial fibrillation, stage three chronic kidney disease (CKD3), osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, anemia, diverticulitis, ventral hernia, constipation, atopic dermatitis, other long-term (current) drug therapy, allergic rhinitis, long-term use of anticoagulants, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, observation of wound care, and policy review, the facility failed to timely assess and treat a pressure ulcer. This affected one resident (#8) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 07/25/25 and a re-entry date of 08/07/25. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and a pressure ulcer of the sacral region stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling). Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Furthermore, Resident #8…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a catheter securement device was utilized for one resident (#4) of three residents reviewed for catheter securement devices. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/26. Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #4's Modification of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Resident #4 was coded to have an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order with a start date of 02/03/26 for indwelling catheter care every shift related to other retention of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was applied during resident care as required and enhanced barrier precautions were in place. This affected two (#4,and #8) of three residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/26. Diagnoses included nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #4's Modification of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. Further review revealed Resident #4 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were with the resident on discharge. This affected one Former Resident ( #52) of three former residents (#52, #53, #54) reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 42. Summary of findings: Review of Former Resident (FR) #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/24/25 and discharged on 03/03/25. Diagnosis included acute kidney failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacteremia, sacral pressure ulcer, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of FR #52's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition. She was dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of FR #52's care plan revealed she wished to return home with family after respite stay. Review of FR #52's medical record revealed she required Acetaminophen (pain), Albuterol nebulizer solution (shortness of breath), Colace (constipation), Eliquis (blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor a resident's (Former Resident #52) wound on admission the throughout her stay. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Review of Former Resident (FR) #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/24/25 and discharged on 03/03/25. Diagnosis included Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling.), acute kidney failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacteremia, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of FR #52's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition. She was dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of FR #52's medical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised for eating. Resident #19 obtained and ate whole food when ordered a pureed diet, choked, received the Heimlich maneuver, and was admitted to the hospital. This deficient practice affected one resident (#19) of three reviewed (#11 and #24) for choking. In addition, two residents (#19, #53) of four reviewed (#11 and #24) failed to have fall precautions in place which resulted in falls. The facility census was 42. Findings included: 1 - Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/18/15. Diagnosis included cerebral vascular accident, schizoaffective disorder, epilepsy, mild intellectual disabilities, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a moderately intact cognition. The resident had coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications along with complaints of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods and cooking equipment were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents receiving food from the kitchen as the the facility identified no residents who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Observation on 04/01/24 between 8:15 A.M. and 8:30 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the walk-in freezer contained greater than 10 boxes of frozen food sitting on the floor of the freezer. Further review revealed a food cart with two trays of left over, uncovered, undated cherry pies. Interview on 04/01/24 at 8:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #277 verified the greater than 10 boxes of frozen food on the floor in the walk-in freezer and the left over pies on the cart that were left unattended. Further interview with DM #277 stated the items on the floor of the walk-in freezer were from the product delivery on Friday, 03/29/24. Follow-up observation on 04/03/24 at 10:15 A.M. in the kitchen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-02-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $202K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH