No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Corry Manor

640 Worth Street, Corry, PA 16407 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (814) 664-9606 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 664-9606 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
19011 Hillcrest Dr · (814) 664-4725 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
330 W Columbus Ave · (814) 664-2617 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
324 W Columbus Ave · (814) 663-0642 · Call to confirm hours
Park
945 Mead Ave · (814) 663-7041 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
650 Worth St · (814) 665-2445

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.1%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.8%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.6%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.5%17.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine18.7%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.4%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.581.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.321.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.6%CMS range 29.4–45.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.7–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified67.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.6–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
41.8%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete documentation for five of seven residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R13, R22, and R23).Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 12/2/25, entitled Medication Administration - General Guidelines revealed the The individual who administers the medication dose records the administration on the resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) directly after the medication is given. At the end of each medication pass the person administering the medications reviews the MAR to ensure necessary doses were administered and documented. In no case should the individual who administered the medications report off duty without first recording the administration of any medication. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/23/24, with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities), Osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease that results from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the status of one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: MDS instructions for section N Medications, subsection N0415E1 High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication Anticoagulant - check if the resident is taking any medications by pharmacological classifications, not how it is used, during the last 7 days or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/25, with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib - irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and other complications), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a condition when there is restricted blood flow to the limb, usually legs), and pain. Resident R2's admission MDS with an ARD of 12/30/25, revealed section N0415E…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R2).Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plan Policy dated 12/2/25, indicated the facility will develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objective and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/25, with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib - irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and other complications), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a condition when there is restricted blood flow to the limb, usually legs), and pain. Review of Resident R2's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/28/25 for Rivaroxaban (an anticoagulant medication that decreases the ability of blood to clot) 15 milligrams (mg - metric unit of measure) once a day. Review of Resident R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans for two of 16 residents reviewed (Residents R2 and R13). Findings include: Review of facility policy dated 12/2/25, entitled Care Plan Policy revealed the facility will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. And Periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment. Resident R2's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/25, with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib - irregular and often rapid heartbeat that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and other complications), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a condition when there is restricted blood flow to the limb, usually legs), and pain. Review of Resident R2's comprehensive care plan on 2/5/26, revealed that of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician sign and date all orders during each of his/her visits for five of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R29, R98 and R100). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Physician Services dated 12/4/24, indicated Physician visits will comply with the following: The resident must be seen every thirty (30) days for the first ninety (90) days after admission, then every sixty (60) days thereafter. The resident's total plan of care (including medication and treatments) must be reviewed with each scheduled visit. and All orders must be recorded in the resident's clinical record and renewed every thirty (30) days. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/12/24, with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), and diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders and residents Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R12 and R56). Findings include: The facility policy entitled Advance Directives dated [DATE], revealed .We recognize each resident's right to refuse treatment, to live a dignified life, and to self-determination.Documentation, written or oral, of informed consent to withhold or withdraw treatment must be placed in the resident's clinical record together with the attending physician's order regarding the withholding or withdrawal of treatment. The physician's order should also be noted on the resident's plan of care and on the inside of the resident's clinical record . Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R8).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled PRN Order for Anti-Psychotic Medications dated 12/4/24, indicated . limits PRN orders for anti-psychotic medication to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician. evaluates the resident for appropriateness of that medication. Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/10/25, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings with emotional highs and emotional lows), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R8's physician's orders revealed an order dated 7/9/25, for Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5mg (milligram) by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for three of seven residents reviewed (Residents R1, R4, and R11).Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Transfer, Discharge and Room Change dated 12/4/24, indicated clinical records describing the residents needs, including list of orders and medications, as directed by the attending physician, shall accompany the resident. Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/12/24, with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (the inability of the heart to maintain an adequate supply of blood to organs and tissues), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), and diabetes (a health condition that is caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin). Resident R1's progress notes revealed a note dated 12/26/24, indicating transfer to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R8).Findings include: Review of Resident R8's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/10/25, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings with emotional highs and emotional lows), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident R8's clinical record lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary was provided to Resident R8 and/or his/her representative. During an interview on 9/11/25, at 11:53 a.m. the Director of Nursing confirmed that the clinical record of Resident R8 lacked evidence that a written summary of the baseline care plans, and order summaries were provided the Resident and/or their representative upon admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for a resident requiring oxygen therapy that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's needs for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R88). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Care Plan Policy dated 12/4/24, indicated the facility will develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objective and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . Review of Resident R88's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/7/25, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R88's physician's orders revealed an order for oxygen two liters per minute PRN (as needed) via nasal cannula (a thin tube with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans to reflect resident's current condition and failed to ensure that resident care plan meetings were held timely for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R22 and R56). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled “Care Plan Policy” dated 12/4/24, revealed that the care plans are periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment. The policy further indicated that the Resident will have the opportunity to discuss their goals for care including their preferences for advanced care planning with the interdisciplinary team. Resident R22's clinical record revealed an admission date of 6/21/19, with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflex uropathy (urinary tract disorder that occurs when urine flow is obstructed), benign hyperplasia prostatic (an enlarged gland below the bladder that causes difficulty urinating) with lower urinary tract symptoms, weakness and dementia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen according to physician's orders for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R88). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen Concentrators dated 12/4/24, indicated external filters are to be cleaned weekly. Prefilled bubble humidifier bottles. need to be changed weekly and as needed. Review of Resident R88's clinical record revealed an admission date of 5/7/25, with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition where your lungs don't exchange air properly), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (when your lungs do not have adequate air flow), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident R88's physician's orders revealed orders for oxygen (O2) two liters per minute PRN (as needed) via nasal cannula (a thin tube with two prongs that fit into the resident's nostrils to deliver oxygen) dated 8/7/25, and oxygen maintenance change O2 tubing and supply bag weekly, wipe down…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations,and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of two medication carts reviewed and one of one medication rooms reviewed (facility medication room and A wing medication cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Medication Storage dated 12/4/24, indicated Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations. and Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications. are immediately removed from stock. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Lantus Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded, even if the pen still contains insulin. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Aspart Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open vial of Tubersol should be discarded within 30 days after opening. Observation of drug storage on 9/8/25, at 2:35 p.m. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Hospice contract, facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that Hospice documentation was maintained in the clinical record for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R74).Findings include: Review of the facility Hospice contract indicated that coordination of care between the nursing facility staff and the Hospice Interdisciplinary Team. It further indicated that Hospice will maintain a medical record of hospice services provided and that the record will be incorporated into the nursing facility medical record. Hospice personnel will chart the services in this record. Review of facility policy Hospice Policy, dated 12/04/24, indicated that the facility shall take direction from the Hospice agency regarding implementation of the coordinated plan of care related to the resident's terminal illness. The policy also indicated that the attending physician will make an order for Hospice services. Review of Resident R74's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's emergency contact/representative regarding a transfer to the emergency room and a change in condition in a timely manner for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Notification of Changes dated 12/4/24, revealed that The Manor must inform the resident immediately, the attending physician, and the resident's representative or interested family member when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed an admission date of 1/23/25, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood-pressure), muscle weakness, and a presence of an aortocoronary bypass graft (a surgical procedure that improves blood flow in the heart by treating narrowed or blocked arteries). Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed a progress note dated 2/2/25, at 2:15 a.m. indicating the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's needs for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R95) and for one of five residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) (Closed Record Resident CR12). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/26/23, indicated the facility will develop a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objective and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and include: services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; be developed within seven days after the completion of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R51 and R91). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 12/26/23, indicated that Periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment. Resident R51's clinical record revealed an admission date of 7/4/24, with diagnoses that included Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (a condition when stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into your throat). Review of Resident R51's Plans of Care revealed a plan of care for risk for skin breakdown with a target date (a date that the care plan is to be updated by) of 8/07/24. During an interview with the Registered Nurse Assessment Coordinator (RNAC) on 11/06/24, at 1:10 p.m. he/she confirmed the care plan for Resident R51 was not reviewed/revised to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical and hospital records, a review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide needed care or services resulting in an actual or potential decline in one or more residents' physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being for one (Closed Record Resident (CR12) of five residents with an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and reposition two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R15 and R38). Findings include: A facility policy, entitled Quality of Care Policy/Activities of Daily Living, dated 12/26/23, revealed each resident will receive and the Manor will provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. A resident's abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment related to smoking for three of eight residents reviewed who smoke at the facility (Residents R11, R14, and R104). Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Smoking Policy, dated 12/26/23, revealed for those Manors that permit smoking the purpose is to provide maximum safety to all resident at all times. It is the intent of the Manor to provide an environment to all those residents, who wish to smoke, the opportunity to do so in a safe environment, with optimal safety to themselves, other residents, volunteers, visitors, and staff members. Residents will be informed of the written smoking policy prior to admission. Smoking will be allowed in designated areas only. Residents must be accompanied by staff, family, or properly trained volunteers while smoking. Smoking materials will be kept in a designated area accessible only by staff. This includes the safekeeping of electronic cigarettes. Staff members are strictly prohibited from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician thoroughly documented a review of the resident's current condition, progress, and problems in maintaining or improving their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and decisions about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen for one (Closed Record Resident CR12) of 25 residents reviewed. Findings include: A facility policy entitled, Physician Services dated 12/22/23, indicated: 1. The resident's total plan of care (including medications and treatments) must be reviewed with each scheduled visit. 2. A progress note must be written, signed, and dated for each physician visit and that each progress note must contain. - An evaluation of the resident's condition, treatment, and a review of the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen. - Continuity of care in maintaining or improving a resident's condition and current medical regimen. - The resident's progress or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of one walk-in coolers, failed to label food brought into the facility with the resident's name and date it was opened in one of one pantry and failed to utilize hair nets to prevent contamination in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Storage of Perishable Foods dated 12/26/23, revealed Many perishable food items may be served until the manufacturer's use by date. Review of facility policy entitled Food Brought by Family/Visitors dated 12/26/23, revealed All foods requiring refrigeration must be dated and labeled with the resident's name . Perishable items may be stored for no greater than 3 days. Review of policy entitled Dress Code dated 12/26/23, revealed Purpose: To present a well-groomed appearance . to provide a standard of sanitation in dress. b. Hair net, beard if facial hair present. Observations of the kitchen on 11/04/24, at 10:40 a.m. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician orders and Pennsylvania Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a legal document specifying the resident/responsible party choices regarding life-sustaining treatments) were consistent for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R80). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Advance Directives Policy - PA dated [DATE], indicated General Policies All decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment or services . are subject to the following policies: 2. Documentation b. The physician's order should also be noted on the resident's plan of care and on the inside of the resident's clinical record. Review of Resident R80's clinical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included Diabetes (a health condition that caused by the body's inability to produce enough insulin), Dementia (a disease that affects short term memory and the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility and clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for one resident (Resident R36) and maintain sanitary resident specific equipment for one resident (Resident R4) of 25 residents reviewed. Findings include: No facility policy provided. Resident R36's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/20/23, with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, right below the knee amputation, and peritonitis (life-threatening condition that occurs when the peritoneum, the tissue that lines the abdomen, becomes inflamed or infected), and a physician's order dated 10/30/24, to set up, prime, and run cycler with two-six liter yellow bags Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. Observation on 11/04/24, at 3:40 p.m. of Resident R36's room revealed one full dialysate (fluid used in dialysis to exchange solutes with the blood and remove waste products from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate urinary catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) care for one of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident R44). Findings include: Review of Resident R44's clinical record revealed an admission date of 3/12/23, with diagnoses that included Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (disorder where urine cannot flow through the urinary tract due to an obstruction and backs up into the kidneys), Retention of Urine (a condition where the bladder doesn't empty completely when urinating), Urinary Tract Infection (an infection in any part of the urinary tract), and Overactive Bladder (a bladder control problem leading to a sudden urge to urinate). Review of Resident R44's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/11/23, for an indwelling catheter. Observations on 11/05/24, at 11:30 a.m. revealed Resident R44 lying in bed with his/her urinary drainage bag lying on the floor with the valve (a device that allows you to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale and duration for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14 days for one of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident R75). Findings include: Resident R75's clinical record revealed an admission date of 4/5/24, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory, thinking skills, and, over time the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), Restlessness and Agitation (an inability to rest or relax because of anxiety), and Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident R75's medication orders revealed a physician's order dated 6/29/24, to administer Hydroxyzine (anti-anxiety) 25 milligrams (mg) Intramuscularly (an injection that goes into the muscle) every eight hours as needed for restlessness/agitation. Further review of physician's orders revealed an order dated 6/29/24, to administer Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) one mg Intramuscularly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label a multi-dose insulin (medication to treat elevated blood sugar levels) pen with the date it was opened, and discard an expired multi-dose insulin pen in one of four medication carts (Unit C), and failed to properly store medications for use for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R37). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Medication Storage in the Facility dated [DATE], indicated medications and biologicals are to be stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturerer's recommendations or those of the supplier. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures should immediately be removed from stock, returned to ICP, and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current order exists. Observation on [DATE], at 3:20 p.m. revealed the Unit C medication cart contained two opened undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Tray Service dated 12/26/23, revealed Procedure Hot and cold foods are attractively assembled on trays for resident. Responsible Cooks, Nutrition Services workers. Review of Job Description for Nutrition Services Assistant revealed Position Responsibilities Must meet job related competencies . and Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: .Serve-safe certification is preferred. Review of HCF SNF On The Job Training Program Trainee Packet Nutrition Services revealed Training Schedule: New staff member will work the schedule of their coach for the first five days. The initial three days will be hands-on with the coach and Trainee. Review of four weeks of dietary schedule revealed that there are four positions on the day shift and four positions on the evening shift. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices for disinfection and storage of a graduate (measuring device) for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: No facility policy provided. Resident R6's clinical record revealed an admission date of 2/20/24, with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid rate that causes poor blood flow starting in the atria chamber of the heart), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), gastrostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen that allows a feeding tube to be inserted directly into the stomach), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition in people who lack bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem). Observations on 11/04/24, at 1:30 p.m. revealed a graduate sitting on Resident R6's bedside table with Tube 9/6/24 2100 written on it. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to oxygen equipment for one of two residents reviewed for oxygen usage (Resident R56). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Disposable Supply Changes dated 12/5/23, indicated that Guideline for when disposable supplies for medical equipment need changed for infection control purposes. Disposable supplies need to be dated when changed And Oxygen Cannulas [a thin tube with two prongs that fits into the resident's nostrils to deliver oxygen], Oxygen Supply Lines [tubing that connects from the oxygen source to the nasal cannula], and Oxygen Humidifier Bottles [plastic bottles filled with distilled water used to humidify oxygen] should be changed weekly or prn [as needed]. Resident R56's clinical record revealed an admission date of 8/30/22, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (COPD - a condition that obstructs air flow in the lungs with symptoms of difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate urinary catheter (tubing inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag) care for one of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident R57). Findings include: Review of Resident R57's clinical record revealed an admission date of 10/12/19, with diagnoses that included Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (disorder where urine cannot flow through the urinary tract due to an obstruction and backs up into the kidneys), Retention of Urine (a condition where the bladder doesn't empty completely when urinating), and Overactive Bladder (a bladder control problem leading to a sudden urge to urinate). Review of Resident R57's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/11/23, for an indwelling catheter. Observations on 12/26/23, at 12:40 p.m.; on 12/27/23, at 8:54 a.m.; and on 12/28/23, at 9:55 a.m. revealed that Resident R57's urinary drainage bag and tubing were lying on the floor. During an interview on 12/27/23, at 8:55 a.m. Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and resident, family members, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for three of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R4, R5, and R17 ). Findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes for July 2023 revealed concerns of resident meal trays are sitting too long; ice cream is melted. Resident Council Minutes for August 2023, revealed concerns of consistency of call bell positioning, filling water more frequently, asking both people in a room if they need water refilled, residents would like nursing to slow down and make sure needs are met, and better communication between shifts. Resident Council Minutes of September 2023, revealed concerns of call lights not being answered in a timely manner, trays are being left in resident rooms, food waiting on stackers in hallways for too long, staff at nursing station on their phones, not getting showers, would like more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual 2019 (RAI-assessment guide used to plan the provision of care for residents), clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) assessment accurately reflected the status for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of the RAI manual instructions for Section M0300C1 Stage 3 Pressure Ulcers identified to code the number of currently present and whose deepest anatomical stage is a Stage 3. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/22, with diagnoses that included transient cerebral attack (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) affecting left side and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R12's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/5/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current care and services for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of a facility policy entitled, Comprehensive Care Planning, dated 12/15/22, indicated that the comprehensive care plans will periodically be reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons as needed and after completion of each assessment. Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/22, with diagnoses that included transient cerebral attack (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) affecting left side and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R12's Quarterly MDS (MDS- periodic assessment of resident care needs) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/5/23, revealed that it was coded as having one Stage 2 (partial thickness, skin loss) pressure ulcer. Clinical record weekly wound documentation from a wound consultant company dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R12). Findings include: Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed an admission date of 12/29/22, with diagnoses that included transient cerebral attack (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (partial paralysis) affecting left side and high blood pressure. Review of Resident R12's Quarterly MDS (MDS- periodic assessment of resident care needs) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/5/23, revealed that it was coded as having one Stage 2 (partial thickness, skin loss) pressure ulcer. Clinical record weekly wound documentation from a wound consultant company dated 8/4/23 through 10/14/23, all revealed the presence of a Stage 3 (full- thickness, skin loss) pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Clinical record documentation entitled Nursing Wound Documentation Record dated 7/25/23 through 10/19/23, all indicated a Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the sacrum.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHAD M. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
DAVID V. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
JEFFREY L. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-29-04 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 123112 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, FBO KENDRA M. UNVERFERTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/31/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 123112 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, FBO KERRI A. ROMESOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 123112 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, FBO KEVAN R. UNVERFERTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/31/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 123112 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, FBO KRISTEN S. STECHSCHUOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 123112 IRREVOCABLE TRUST, FBO KYLE J. UNVERFERTHOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/31/2021
JOSEPH L. UNVERFERTH 12-15-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
LAWRENCE G. UNVERFERTH 12-13-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
PROY, BERNARDIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
DURAN, HEATHERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
KLAY, CELESTEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
ROMES, KERRIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
SHAW, ANTHONYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
UNVERFERTH, CHADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2003
HCF MANAGEMENT, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$444K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 20%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $444K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,753per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$292per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395489. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next