No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sweden Valley Manor

1028 East Second Street, Coudersport, PA 16915 · For profit - Corporation · 121 certified beds · (814) 274-7610 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (814) 274-7610 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Jul 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
UPMC COLE<0.1 mi
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1001 E 2nd St. · (814) 274-5585 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
101 N Main St · (814) 738-8383 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9 W 2nd St · (814) 274-9102 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.1%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.8%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.7%20.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.6%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.1%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.3%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%9.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.161.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.461.181.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
20.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 20.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 26% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.5%CMS range 38.4–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 6.8–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge20.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge23.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge23.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.6–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 100.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22 ↑
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-24)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's main kitchen and resident pantry area.Findings include: Observation of the facility's main kitchen on July 21, 2026, at 10:30 AM, with Employee 15, dietary services supervisor, revealed the following: A small metal pan of a prepared product resembling tuna salad, on the bottom shelf of the reach-in refrigerator, with no label to identify the product, a date of when it was placed there or when it needed used by. Front vents on the bottom of the outside of the reach-in refrigerator were observed to have various spills down the face of this area. The juice machine with an observable filter inside the machine, presented with build-up. A green plastic basket under the steam table contained numerous grape jelly and apple jelly packets. The basket did not contain any date as to when the packets needed used by or when the expire. A clear blue plastic container of saltine cracker packets was observed under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-24 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents since their last standard survey (ending August 8, 2025).Findings include: The surveyor requested the Facility Assessment document (Assessment of the resident population that includes an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population's acuity and any other pertinent information about the residents that may affect the services the facility must provide. The assessment of the resident population contributes to the identification of staffing decisions and inform the facility about what skills and competencies staff must possess in order to deliver the necessary care required by the residents being served on any given day,) during interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 21, 2026, at 10:47 AM; July 22, 2026, at 2:00 PM, and July 23, 2026, at 2:00 PM. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) or legal representative of the reason for discharge, in writing, upon discharge from the facility for three of four sampled residents who were transferred out of the facility. (Residents 4, 9, and 117)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 was transferred to the hospital on July 13, 2026, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident and resident's responsible party, or the legal representative, were notified in writing of the transfer. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 was transferred to the hospital July 13, 2026, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence that the resident and resident's responsible party, or the legal representative, were notified in writing of the transfer. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 117 was transferred to the hospital on July 18, 2026, after a change in condition. There was no documented evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to maintain the highest practicable standard of care related to medication administration on two of four hallways (B and D Hallway; Residents 7, 14, 15, 20, 26, 29, 37, 42, 41, 43, 44, 46, 55, 56, 61, 62, 70, 72, 88, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 117, and 118).Findings include: The current facility policy titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines states that medications are to be administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time. Interview on July 23, 2026, at 9:00 AM with Employee 9, licensed practical nurse, revealed that she had only begun to administer the morning medications on D Hallway because she was assigned two halls of morning medication passes. When asked if this happened often, Employee 9 said it was happening more and more. Clinical record review of the residents on D Hallway revealed that the following residents had morning medications ordered with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and review of personnel training records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure specific competencies necessary to care for resident needs for nine of 10 employees reviewed (Employees 4, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 20); and for one of one resident reviewed for peritoneal dialysis concerns (Resident 117).Findings include: The surveyor requested the Facility Assessment document (Assessment of the resident population that includes an evaluation of diseases, conditions, physical or cognitive limitations of the resident population's acuity and any other pertinent information about the residents that may affect the services the facility must provide. The assessment of the resident population contributes to the identification of staffing decisions and inform the facility about what skills and competencies staff must possess in order to deliver the necessary care required by the residents being served on any given day.) during interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator on July 21, 2026, at 10:47 AM, July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate, timely, physician response to consultant pharmacist recommendations for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 5 and 12). Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Medication Regimen Review and Recommendation, last reviewed without changes on December 3, 2025, noted that non-emergent recommendations are to be addressed within the next 30 days. If a recommendation has not been answered within 30 days, the consultant will notify the Director of Nursing that the recommendation is still pending. If after 60 days, there is still no response, the recommendation will be made again. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on July 22, 2026, at 2:00 PM revealed that monthly consultant pharmacist reviews are documented in residents' physical charts on the nursing unit (not in the electronic medical record). Review of Resident 5's physical chart on the nursing unit revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 117), and failed to ensure an environment free from the potential spread of infection related to resident laundry processing. Findings include: Review of a current facility document titled EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) states that the facility will utilize enhanced barrier precautions that includes residents who have indwelling medical devices (items that stay in the body for a long time to help treat illness, drain fluid, or replace body parts). The document states that EBP will include signage outside the doorway and requires the use of gloves and gowns for any high contact resident care activities. The document further states that each room will have a hanging storage bag for gowns, and a closed receptacle for used gowns. Clinical record review for Resident 117 revealed they had an indwelling medical device inserted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal and influenza immunization unless contraindicated for three of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 3, 16, and 59).Findings include: Current CDC website information notes that there are four pneumococcal vaccines available in the United States. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs: PCV15, PCV20 (Prevnar20), and PCV21) and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). Each of these vaccines helps protect against specific serotypes, or strains, of pneumococcal bacteria. The number at the end of the vaccine name tells how many strains the vaccine includes. CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults (https://www-new.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/downloads/Vaccine-Timing-Adults-JobAid.pdf) instructs that a complete series would be a PCV13 (Prevnar 13, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) at any age, a PPSV23 (Pneumovax 23, pneumococcal polysaccharide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-24 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were educated and offered the COVID-19 immunization unless contraindicated for two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 3 and 59); and failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination education.Findings include: Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and Employee 5, registered nurse on July 24, 2026, at 8:35 AM revealed that the facility had no evidence of facility documentation regarding staff COVID-19 immunization education. The interview indicated that the facility had no practice documenting staff COVID-19 immunization education. Clinical record review for Resident 3 revealed that the facility admitted them on July 4, 2026. There was no information in their chart indicating a history of COVID-19 immunization status, or if they had been offered COVID-19 immunization education. Resident 3's clinical record did not contain evidence that they received a COVID-19 vaccine. Clinical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regime was free from potentially unnecessary medication for one of five residents reviewed for medication regime review (Residents 12).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 12 revealed active physician orders for the following psychotropic medications: Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) 5 mg (milligrams) two times a day related to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, is a rare mental illness characterized by psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized thinking, alongside mood episodes including mania and occasionally major depression), active since June 28, 2024 Wellbutrin (antidepressant) 100 mg by mouth one time a day related to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type; personality disorder (mental health condition where people have a lifelong pattern of seeing themselves and reacting to others in ways that cause problems), bipolar disorder (mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected a resident's status for three of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 14, and 65).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 6 revealed a diagnoses list that included Parkinson's disease (progressive neurological disorder that affects movement due to degeneration of nerve cells in the brain) since October 1, 2023, contracture (permanent shortening of muscles, tendons, or other soft tissues that restrict normal joint movement and cause deformity) of the left hand since October 25, 2022, and contracture of muscle, unspecified, since November 8, 2021. An active physician's order dated September 15, 2023, instructed staff to place a carrot splint (soft, tubular, positioning device) to Resident 6's left hand every shift with gentle passive range-of-motion for management of hand range-of-motion. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool completed at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 97). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 2 revealed a diagnosis list that included the presence of a cardiac pacemaker (an electronic device to help regulate the beating of the heart). A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) for Resident 2 dated May 17, 2026, revealed an active diagnosis of the presence of a cardiac pacemaker. Documentation dated March 31, 2026, at 5:16 PM revealed a chest x-ray that was completed and noted a pacemaker. Review of Resident 2's care plan revealed no current comprehensive, person-centered care plan that addressed the resident's pacemaker, any pertinent assessments related to the pacemaker and/or clinical care, or any associated precautions. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve the ability to perform activities of daily living for one of two residents reviewed for rehabilitation concerns (Resident 104). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 104 revealed a diagnoses list that included a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (a type of broken hip). A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated June 8, 2026, revealed that facility staff assessed Resident 104 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3, which indicated cognitive impairment. Review of clinical documentation revealed a PT (physical therapy) Daily Note dated July 2, 2026, at 12:00 AM which noted the physical therapy discharge report was completed and an RNP (Restorative Nursing Program) was developed. Documentation for Resident 104 titled, PT Discharge Summary, for June 30, 2026, to July 2, 2026, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practical care regarding ordered weights for two of seven residents reviewed for nutrition concerns (Residents 11 and 104).Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A current physician order for Resident 11 dated May 22, 2026, instructed staff to obtain weight every week for four weeks and then monthly and as needed. Clinical record review for Resident 11 revealed a care plan that noted a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to the medical history. An intervention dated May 25, 2026, included weigh per orders, monthly, and as needed (PRN). Review of the current documented weights for Resident 11 revealed the weights were measured on May 22, 2026, June 30, 2026, and July 4, 2026. There were no documented weights for the weeks of May 25, 2026, June 1, 2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and family and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assist a resident to replace lost glasses for one of two residents reviewed for vision/hearing concerns (Resident 14).Findings include: Interview with Resident 14's husband on July 21, 2026, at 12:54 PM revealed that Resident 14 wears glasses; however, she lost her glasses while living at the facility and staff cannot find them. Clinical record review for Resident 14 revealed that the facility admitted her on April 10, 2026. Resident 14's profile picture in her electronic medical record revealed that she wore glasses. A nursing admission progress note dated April 10, 2026, at 4:30 PM indicated that Resident 14 had glasses and that she was wearing a corrective vision appliance on admission. Review of available plans of care for Resident 14 since her admission to the facility failed to provide evidence that the facility incorporated Resident 14's use of glasses in her plan of care. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on July 22, 2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the highest practical care to promote pressure ulcer healing for one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 104). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 104 revealed social services documentation dated June 4, 2026, at 9:42 PM that noted the resident was admitted to the facility. Clinical record review for Resident 104 revealed a diagnoses list that included a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (a type of broken hip). A Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated June 8, 2026, revealed that facility staff assessed Resident 104 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 3, which indicated cognitive impairment. A skin and wound note dated June 5, 2026, at 2:36 PM noted the resident has two unstageable (severe full-thickness skin and tissue loss with undetermined depth) pressure ulcers present on admission which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an environment free from potential accident hazards for two of seven residents reviewed for accident hazards (Residents 5 and 14).Findings include: Observation of the nurses' station on July 22, 2026, at 9:42 AM revealed a device on the wall with a red flashing light with an audible hi-pitched alarm sounding. A computer screen below the flashing red light noted, Door Alarm, Common Smokers Patio, with the Age of the alarm at 27 minutes at that time. The alarm continued to sound with the visual signal until 9:47 AM without evidence that staff who were in the nurses' station at the time responded to the area indicated by the system to have a concern for a potentially unsecured exit door. Observation of the nurses' station on July 22, 2026, at 10:34 AM again revealed that the smoker's patio door was alarming by the visual and audible alarm. Observation of the smoker's patio from the common hallway on July 22, 2026, at 10:36 AM revealed a male resident sitting on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent potential complications from a dialysis access site for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis concerns (Resident 117).Findings include: Review of the facility's current procedure entitled Disconnecting PD (peritoneal dialysis) includes step by step directions for the procedure after completion of Resident 117's peritoneal dialysis (a treatment that uses the lining of your belly to filter blood when kidneys fail, accessed through a port located directly through the abdominal wall and connected to external tubing, also referred to as PD). This order of events in this document state that the resident's door should closed, staff should apply a mask, and then wash hands and apply gloves, prior to accessing the PD port. Observations on July 23, 2026, at 8:10 AM of Resident 117's disconnecting PD procedure, revealed that Employee 6,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess all potential risk areas for entrapment for two of seven residents with enabler bars for accident hazards (Residents 86 and 99); and obtain informed consent for use of enabler bars for one of seven residents reviewed for accident hazards (Resident 86). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 99 revealed a diagnosis list that included difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated June 28, 2026, revealed that facility staff assessed Resident 99 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan for Resident 99 revealed the resident is at risk for falls related to difficulty in walking. An intervention included: requires the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store resident medications on one of three nursing units reviewed (Nursing Unit B). Findings include: Observation on July 23, 2026, at 9:16 AM during the medication pass on the Nursing Unit B revealed a medication cart being utilized by Employee 4, licensed practical nurse. Further observation of the medication cart revealed the following: There were several unsecured and unidentified medications found in the bottom of the drawers where medication blister cards were stored that included the following: two oblong yellow tablets, a round beige pill, half of an oblong shaped tablet, an oblong green colored tablet, a while round pill, and a smaller white round pill. The above findings were reviewed in a meeting with the Nursing Home Administrator and Employee 5, registered nurse, during a meeting on July 23, 2026, at 2:00 PM. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1) Nursing services

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate clinical documentation for one of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 117).Findings include: The surveyor made an observation on July 23, 2026, at 8:10 AM of Employee 6, registered nurse, complete the disconnection procedure for Resident 117 after completion of their peritoneal dialysis treatment (a treatment to complete dialysis in a home setting that uses the lining of your belly to filter blood when kidneys fail, accessed through a port located directly through the abdominal wall and connected to external tubing which is run through a filtration machine, also referred to as PD). Review of Resident 117's clinical record revealed that the nurse who initialed (documented) completing this procedure was Employee 4, licensed practical nurse. Further review revealed that there was no documented completion for this task on three additional dates in July of 2026, including July 15, 16, and 18. Additionally, there was no documentation on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were addressed timely for one of 13 residents interviewed (Resident 2).Findings include: Interview with Resident 2 on August 5, 2025, at 12:46 PM revealed that she asked for cups of hot water for her hot chocolate and the cups are stained brown. Observation of the clean racks of coffee cups in the kitchen on August 6, 2025, at 10:44 AM with Employee 6 (dietary supervisor) revealed that most of the cups were stained brown. Employee 6 stated that an evening shift dietary staff member is supposed to clean the cups once a week, by soaking and scrubbing them. She stated that the staff are to sign off on the cleaning of the coffee cups weekly. Review of the weekly cleaning tasks documentation for June 23, June 30, July 7, July 14, July 28, and August 4, 2025, revealed staff only de-stained the coffee cups on June 30, and July 23, 2025. Employee 6 confirmed these findings on August 6, 2025, at 10:51 AM. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, clinical record review, and review of a resident fund account facility documents, it was determined that the facility imposed a charge against a resident's personal funds for a service which payment is made under Medicaid, for one two residents reviewed (Resident 60).Findings include: Interview with Resident 60 on August 6, 2025, at 9:59 AM revealed that she has new eyeglasses ready to be picked up, but she has to pay for them first. She indicated that she could see out of the glasses that she has but sometimes it is blurry. She said that she would not have her new glasses paid off until October 2025, because she has to pay for them with her monthly allowance of $45.00 dollars. She said since she has to pay for the glasses, she would not receive any personal spending money until October 2025, when her glasses were paid off. Clinical record review for Resident 60 revealed that her current insurance is a Medicaid plan. Further clinical record review revealed that Resident 60 was sent out to a local eye doctor for an acute problem on February 11,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide required notification to a resident whose Medicare covered services ended for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 107). Findings include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care received from the skilled nursing facility is ending; and how to contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. The provider must ensure that the beneficiary or their representative signs and dates the NOMNC to demonstrate that the beneficiary or their representative received the notice and understands the termination of services can be disputed. If the provider is personally unable to deliver a NOMNC to a person acting on behalf of an enrollee, then the provider should telephone the representative to advise him or her when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, employee personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an abuse prohibition policy that required a thorough investigation of prospective employee's employment history for two of five newly hired employees reviewed (Employees 3 and 4).Findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last reviewed without changes December 10, 2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to undertake background checks of all employees and to retain on file applicable records of current employees regarding such checks. The facility would attempt to obtain reference checks from prior employees for an applicant. Review of the facility policy entitled Reference Check Request Policy, last reviewed December 10, 2024, revealed the Administrator will be responsible for ensuring that each applicant seeking employment with the facility will be required to complete a release regarding reference checks. Upon receipt of satisfactory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate and implement interventions after a resident elopement for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 52). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An elopement evaluation completed the same day indicated the resident had a history of elopement (leaving unsafely) at home and had wandering behavior. A social service note dated May 30, 2025, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition related to Alzheimer's disease, had the ability to ambulate without a device, may wander, and was to be monitored for exit-seeking. A social service note dated June 3, 2025, at 8:10 AM revealed that Resident 52 was reviewed by the inter-disciplinary team and was disoriented with poor safety awareness, can ambulate without a device and noted as an elopement risk as evidenced by wandering from her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to initiate timely interventions for a resident with significant weight loss for one of six residents reviewed for nutrition concerns (Resident 52). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 52 revealed the resident had a weight change from June 17, 2025, to July 17, 2025, decreasing from 135.2 pounds to 125.6 pounds reflecting a 9.6-pound, 7.1 percent significant weight loss in 30 days. Further clinical record review revealed a nutrition services note by the registered dietitian dated July 21, 2025, at 6:13 PM that noted the significant weight loss as indicated above and indicated the resident had a decline in meal intakes. The note indicated Boost (nutrition supplement) would be added twice a date for the resident to provide extra calories and fluid to help the resident meet nutritional needs. A review of Resident 52's physician orders revealed Boost two times a day was not ordered for the resident until July 31, 2025, 10 days later. There was no evidence Resident 52 was provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of select facility policies and procedures, observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate enhanced barrier precautions for two of 19 residents reviewed (Residents 12 and 13) and implement appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) for one of one resident reviewed on TBP (Resident 25). Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) memo entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated March 20, 2024, revealed that CMS was issuing new guidance for State Survey Agencies and long-term care (LTC) facilities on the use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to align with nationally accepted standards. In 2019, CDC (Centers for Disease Control) introduced a new approach to the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) called Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). In July 2022, the CDC released updated EBP recommendations for Implementation of PPE Use in nursing homes to prevent spread of MDROs. The CDC's, Implementation of Personal Protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to store food and maintain food service equipment in a safe and sanitary manner and prevent the potential for food contamination in the facility's main kitchen. Findings include: An observation of the facility's main kitchen on September 17, 2024, at 11:50 AM with Employee 2, corporate dietitian, revealed the following: The coffee station area contained dried brown liquid spills and dried food splatter on the wall behind the coffee machine, which extended down the wall to the floor area observed under the counter space. The lower shelf of the table area where the coffee dispenser was located contained dust and debris and dried liquid spills, along with a plastic dish rack filled with clear plastic jugs, which the interiors were significantly stained brown making them opaque. A plastic tray beside the rack of pitchers also contained plastic gallon jugs with interior brown staining sitting on the tray, which had dried food debris and dried liquid spills. A carboard box of coffee filters was also sitting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a restorative nursing program as recommended by therapy to maintain range of motion for four of five residents reviewed (Residents 22, 15, 47, and 64). Findings include: Review of Resident 22's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated August 2, 2024, that indicated the facility assessed Resident 22 as having range of motion (ROM) limitations to both sides of her lower extremities. A previous MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the facility assessed Resident 22 as having no ROM limitations to her lower extremities. A physical therapy form entitled Restorative Nursing Program Plan, dated July 12, 2024, indicates that physical therapy implemented a restorative program for nursing staff to complete a lower extremity active range of motion program for Resident 22. There was no documented evidence in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided that was consistent with professional standards of practice, for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: In an interview with Resident 48 on September 17, 2024, at 2:00 PM he indicated that he had been having pain in his tail bone area from a recent fall that still hurts. Clinical record review for Resident 48 revealed a physician's order dated July 11, 2022, for the resident to have Acetaminophen (a medication used to treat mild pain) 325 milligrams (mg), two tablets every six hours as needed for a pain level 1-5. Resident 48 had an additional order for Tramadol HCL (a medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) 75 mg every six hours as needed for a pain level of 6-10. A review of Resident 48's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2024, revealed Resident 48 was administered the Tramadol on August 3, 9, 26, and 30 for a pain level of 5, and on August 29, for a pain level documented as 0.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication per physician's orders for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 48). Findings include: Observation of Resident 48 on September 17, 2024, at 2:00 PM revealed the resident was lying in bed watching television. A medicine cup with pills in it was observed on the resident's bedside table beside the bed. As the surveyor began speaking with Resident 48, the resident grabbed the medicine cup and proceeded to dump the cup of pills in his mouth and then his water cup before the resident responded to the surveyor. The resident indicated he had just taken his pills. No staff were present in the room or hall near the resident's room. Clinical record review for Resident 48 revealed a physician's order dated April 9, 2023, indicating the resident may not self-administer, due to no request. Review of Resident 48's medication administration record for September 17, 2024, revealed the resident was documented as being administered Propranolol (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment on one of four nursing units (C Nursing Unit; Residents 7 and 55). Findings include: Observation of the C Unit shower room on September 18, 2024, at 9:25 AM revealed the external sealing located on the floor around the base of the commode was a brownish color and peeling away from the commode in some areas. There was also a significant accumulation of dust on a vent located on the ceiling. An interview with Resident 7's family on September 20, 2024, at 9:00 AM revealed concerns related to the cleanliness of the heating unit on the wall in Resident 7's room. Observation of the heating unit on the wall in Resident 7's room on September 20, 2024, at 9:41 AM revealed an extensive build-up of dust on vents of the unit. There was also an accumulation of debris under the unit. Observation of the heating unit on the wall of Resident 55's room on September 20, 2024, at 9:44 AM revealed an extensive build-up of dust on the vents of the unit. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident 60). Findings include: Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of pneumonia from the hospital setting. Review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a form completed at specific intervals to determine care needs) dated August 17, 2024, that indicated the facility assessed him as still having an active pneumonia infection. There was no documented evidence in Resident 60's clinical record to indicate that he continued to have an active pneumonia infection since April 27, 2024. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 19, 2024, at 9:40 AM confirmed that Resident 60's pneumonia diagnosis was coded in error on the MDS dated [DATE]. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f)(ix) Medical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care or services to maintain a resident's ambulation status for one of two residents reviewed for ambulation concerns (Resident 15). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident 15 revealed that she was on a nursing rehabilitation program for ambulation. The program was ordered on November 7, 2023. The program indicated that she was to be ambulated with the assistance of one staff and a wheeled walker. A therapy recommendation form dated October 31, 2023, confirmed the above noted program was a therapy recommended program. Further clinical record review for Resident 15 revealed that there was no documented evidence that the ambulation program was being completed. The Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator were made aware of concerns related to Resident 15's ambulation program and confirmed the above noted findings on September 19, 2024, at 2:12 PM. The facility failed to provide restorative/rehabilitation services in order to maintain Resident 15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain proper treatment to maintain vision for one of two residents reviewed for vision concerns (Resident 1). Findings include: An interview with Resident 1 on September 17, 2024, at 11:37 AM revealed she feels her vision has gotten worse and reported a history of macular degeneration. The resident was unsure when her last vision appointment was. The resident was admitted in 2019. Clinical record review for Resident 1 revealed a diagnosis list that included diabetes mellitus (a disorder of the metabolism that impacts insulin production and causes high blood sugar levels). There was no listed diagnosis for macular degeneration noted in the electronic health record diagnoses list. A review of the current physician orders revealed an order dated February 2, 2020, that indicated that Resident 1 may be seen by the audiologist, dentist, podiatrist, optometrist, and ophthalmologist. A quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment completed at specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foot care and treatment to avoid medical complications for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 49). Findings include: Interview with Resident 49 on September 17, 2024, at 11:30 AM revealed that he has not seen a podiatrist for his left foot. Observation of Resident 49's left foot during the interview revealed that his toenails were elongated. The nail on the first and second toes were thick and yellow, and so long that they were beginning to curve. Review of Resident 49's clinical record revealed that the facility admitted him on March 30, 2024, with a diagnosis of diabetes. There was no documented evidence in Resident 49's clinical record to indicate the facility initiated diabetic foot care to care for his nails and avoid medical complications, until after this surveyor made observations and spoke with Resident 49 about his foot. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 19, 2024, at 11:49 AM confirmed the above findings for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of select manufacture's guidelines, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent (Resident 11). Findings include: The facility's medication error rate was 7.69 percent based on 26 medication opportunities with two medication errors. Observation of a medication administration pass on September 17, 2024, at 10:20 AM revealed Employee 1, licensed practical nurse, preparing to administer Potassium Chloride (used as a supplement for heart, nerve, and muscle health) 20 MEq (milliequivalent) ER (extended release) and Metoprolol (treats hypertension) 100 mg (milligrams) ER. Employee 1 proceeded to crush both the Potassium Chloride and the Metoprolol extended-release tablets prior to administering them to Resident 11. According to The Institute for Safe Medication Practices, do not crush list, last updated in 2016, revealed that both the Potassium Chloride ER and the Metoprolol ER should not be crushed. Both medications are indicated as slow release. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely dental services for one of one resident reviewed for dental concerns (Resident 29). Findings include: Interview with Resident 29 on September 17, 2024, at 2:08 PM revealed that she was concerned about her top denture that she has never received. She indicated that she was to receive them today, but the dentist indicated that she was not on the list. She said that he did not provide any other information and that he then left the building. She said she has been waiting on this denture since at least June 2024, but that the whole process started much earlier. Clinical record review for Resident 29 revealed a dental consult summary dated August 9, 2023, revealed that dental impressions for upper denture were made. A dental consult summary dated October 17, 2023, revealed that Resident 29 needed to continue treatment with the dentist for denture care. A dental consult summary dated November 10, 2023, revealed that Resident 29's bite registration (taking an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-07-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage at the facility's outside dumpsters. Findings include: Observation of the facility's main dumpsters located outside on facility property on July 21, 2026, at 10:30 AM, revealed the following: A dumpster which Employee 15, dietary supervisor, indicated is used for recyclable products with its lid open. Next to two additional dumpsters in the same area were several broken wheelchairs, miscellaneous equipment parts, five wooden pallets, and one broken lawn chair. A second observation of the area on July 22, 2026, at 10:26 AM, revealed metal framing for a pop-up tent, had been added to the pile of broken wheelchairs and parts and other items noted above and the following: A piece of paper with resident identifying name and room number, laying in the grass next to the two dumpsters, near the pile of broken items. On the ground surrounding a single dumpster was various debris consisting of plastic lids, leaves, an empty crushed nutritional container, cigarette…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHAD M. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
DAVID V. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
JEFFREY L. UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-29-04 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KENDRA M. UOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KERRI A. ROOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KEVAN R. UNOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KRISTEN S.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOANN C. UNVERFERTH 12-31-12 IRREVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST FBO KYLE J. UNVOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/13/2021
JOSEPH L. UNVERFERTH 12-15-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
LAWRENCE G. UNVERFERTH 12-13-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
R. STEVEN UNVERFERTH 12-14-11 IRRV GRANTOR TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 12/13/2021
REDMOND, ANGELAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF—since 05/22/2023
ROMES, KERRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF—since 03/29/2019
KLAY, CELESTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER—since 01/01/2016
SHAW, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER—since 06/26/2015
HCF MANAGEMENT, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL—since 01/01/2004

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$381K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 7%Other / private 20%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $381K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,182per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$291per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 395699. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next