St Catherines Manor Of Washington Court House

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 45.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to protect against potential contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility that receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified three (#9, #36, and #55) residents with active orders for nothing by mouth. The facility census was 46. Findings include:Observation on 12/15/25 at 8:57 A.M. revealed four opened containers of food items with no date marking in the walk-in refrigerator including one bag of yellow cheese slices, one bag of white cheese, one bag of pepperoni slices, and one package of bacon. Observation on 12/15/25 at 8:59 A.M. revealed two opened and undated bags of egg patties, one of the bags of egg patties was stored with the bag open allowing exposure to air in the freezer. Further observation of the walk-in freezer at this time revealed three bags of opened and undated vegetables, including zucchini, corn, and sweet potato fries. Interview on 12/15/25 at 9:10 A.M. with [NAME] #150 revealed opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of a facility Legionella plan and testing and monitoring documents, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure measures to address and prevent Legionella growth within the facility were maintained and conducted as required and failed to ensure infection control measures were maintained following urinary catheter care for a resident (#6). This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. The census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the document titled, Legionella Policy - Environmental, revealed Legionella prevention control measures of quarterly testing of chlorine levels, weekly testing of water temperatures, monitor and flushing pipes in rooms and areas that were not in use, monitor kitchen ice machines, eye wash stations, water filters, sinks and showers in resident rooms and central showers, circulation tubs and drinking fountains, water filters to be changed bi-annually, and kitchen appliances to be maintained and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, facility failed to ensure a resident room was set to a comfortable temperature. This affected one (#9) of 16 residents reviewed for environmental issues during the initial sample. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/28/21. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, heart embolism, tracheostomy, contracture of multiple sites, dependence on ventilator status, anoxic brain injury, epilepsy, and heart disease.Review of the plan of care dated 11/18/25 revealed Resident #9 had a tracheostomy (trach) with interventions to ensure trach ties were secured at all times, give humidified oxygen as prescribed, elevate head of the bed, provide oral care, monitor and document for restlessness and agitation, suction as necessary, and universal precautions.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly assessed for appropriateness before being placed on the secured memory care unit. This affected one (#49) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 07/15/25. Diagnoses included fibromyalgia, malnutrition, dementia with mood disturbance, and kidney disease.Review of hospital discharge paperwork dated 07/15/25 revealed Resident #49 had been living at home, was hospitalized , and found to have a urinary tract infection (UTI). The hospital documentation revealed the resident had a dementia/Alzheimer's diagnosis and had wandered while in the hospital.Review of the elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 was not a risk of elopement.Review of the care plan dated 07/16/25 revealed Resident #49 was at risk for elopement with interventions to reside on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor behaviors with psychotropic medication use. This affected two (#2 and #56) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 46.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/04/18. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, heart failure, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and atrial fibrillation.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. The resident was assessed to require supervision with eating, and was dependent with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers.Review of the care plan dated 03/04/25 revealed Resident #2 was at risk for complications related to psychotropic medication use related to a diagnosis of depression. Interventions included educate on risks, benefits, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed in a timely manner. This affected two (#2 and #35) of four residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 46. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 09/04/18. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, heart failure, dementia, Parkinson's disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. The resident was assessed to require supervision with eating, and was dependent with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers. Review of the care conferences for the last 12 months for Resident #2 revealed care conferences were only completed on 04/21/25 and 09/19/25. Interview on 12/17/25 at 10:16 A.M. with Social Service Director (SSD) #156…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide showers to residents who were dependent on staff for assistance. This affected one (#8) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 46.Findings included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease (stage II), candidiasis, acute embolism and thrombosis of a deep vein of a lower extremity, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and traumatic brain injury. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/06/25, revealed he had mild cognitive impairment. Review of section GG revealed the resident was assessed to needed substantial/maximum physical assistance from staff for showers/bathing.Review of Resident #8's current care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely implementation of a therapy recommended splint and failed to ensure orders were followed regarding contractures. This affected one (#9) of one residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 46.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/28/21. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, heart embolism, tracheostomy, contracture of multiple sites, dependence on ventilator status, anoxic brain injury, epilepsy, and heart disease.Review of the plan of care dated 02/28/24 revealed Resident #9 had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to extremity contractures with interventions to anticipate needs, use supportive devices, hand roll or equivalent in the right palm as ordered, and treatment per orders to fingers, elbows, and wrists. The care plan dated 10/16/24 revealed the resident was unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to check for placement of a gastronomy tube prior to administering medications through the tube. This affected one (#36) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 03/27/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD).Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. The resident was assessed to require substantial assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing, and transfers.Observation on 12/16/25 at 7:58 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #163 did not check verify placement or check for residual tube feeding prior to administering medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were ingested during medication administration prior to leaving the resident's room. This affected one (#14) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 05/02/24. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and myocardial infarction.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. The resident was assessed to require setup with eating, supervision with toileting and bathing, and substantial assistance with dressing and transfers.Observation on 12/16/25 at 8:26 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #133 administered medications to Resident #14 and left the room before Resident #14 took her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to HCF MANAGEMENT — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $319K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH