No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Coronado

1751 N 15th St., Abilene, TX 79603 · For profit - Corporation · 188 certified beds · (325) 673-3531 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Dec 2024Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0570)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$184,619 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $184,619 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1525 Hickory St · (325) 674-9494 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1619 Ambler Ave · (325) 672-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1619 Ambler Avenue · (325) 812-1118 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.6%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.2%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.3%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.5%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.632.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.522.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.1–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.0%CMS range 4.5–17.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.85
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
49.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 121 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 26 of 26 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to isolate COVID-19 positive Residents #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15, after they tested positive for COVID-19 and continued to cohort with negative tested Residents #4, #6, #16, and #17 on the same unit. Resident #4 (negative) was cohorted with Resident #12 (positive) in the same room. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff changed PPE between working with COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative residents. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 stayed in quarantine while being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 12 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for elopement. The facility failed to provide supervision for Resident #1, who was care planed for wandering in unsafe places, to prevent him from eloping from the facility on 04/18/2024. The facility was unaware Resident #1 had exited the facility, the last time he was seen by an employee was 2:00 PM, and as a result, the resident was missing for approximately 6 and half hours and was located by assistance from law enforcement. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 04/26/2024. While the IJ was lowered on 04/27/2024 at 3:30 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. This failure could affect residents who were identified as elopement risks and placed them at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pests and rodents. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep American roaches out of the facility. This failure could affect all 68 residents by placing them at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life.Findings included:Record review of invoice of pest control company, dated 06/03/2026, revealed roaches were reported in rooms 215, 236, 237, 238, 240, 241. The report revealed the following: American Roach activity.As discussed with the Administrator and Maintenance Director, during previous visits:- The primary contributing factor continues to be the lack of caulking around the bases of many toilets throughout the facility. Unsealed toilets bases and plumbing penetration provide direct access points for American Roaches, allowing them to travel freely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the DON did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or more residents for 6 (03/07/2026, 03/16/2026, 04/04/2026, 04/11/2026, 04/18/2026, and 04/19/2026) of 54 days (03/01/2026 - 04/24/2026) reviewed for DON coverage. The facility failed to ensure the DON did not serve as a charge nurse when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or more residents on 03/07/2026, 03/16/2026, 04/04/2026, 04/11/2026, 04/18/2026, and 04/19/2026.This failure leaves residents without the nursing administrative oversight that only the DON can provide.Findings include:During an interview on 04/23/2026 at 5:40 p.m., the DON stated she was falling behind on monitoring the nurses had performed their assessments and making sure the care plans were updated because she was having to work at night as a CNA and nurse to fill in open shifts. She stated she knew that she was not supposed to serve as a charge nurse when there were more than 60 residents but there were times when they did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 3 (Resident #37, Resident #54 and Resident #67) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to:Ensure Resident #37's ileostomy collection bag was obscured from view.Ensure Resident #54's urinary catheter collection bag was obscured from view.Ensure Resident #67 colostomy and indwelling urinary collection bags were emptied and obscured from view.These failures could place residents at risk for feeling uncomfortable and disrespected, leading to isolation and deterioration in general health conditions.Findings included:Record review of Resident #37's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #37 was admitted with the medical diagnoses of personal history of malignant neoplasm of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility or to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 12 of 15 confidential residents reviewed for meeting grievances.The facility failed to provide a verbal or written response to the Resident Council addressing the grievances reported from their meetings on May 2025, August 2025, September 2025, January 2026, February 2026, and March 2026, which included issues with nursing services, dietary services, and housekeeping services. This failure could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances, a decreased sense of self-worth, and a decline in quality of life.Findings included:Record review on 04/23/2026 of the Grievance logs for May 2025 reflected the Resident Council filed one grievance involving bed sheets not being changed for a month or more. Record review reflected there was no name or group listed in notification of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 7 of 19 (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) resident rooms observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure rooms 231 B, 233 A, 234 A, 234 B had mattresses that the nonpermeable outer cover was intact and not peeling. The facility failed to ensure rooms 201, 209, 210, and 218's sinks had hot water.These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, discomfort, and safety.Findings included:During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 8:57 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s hot water temperature was 74.1 degrees F in the sink.During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 8:59 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s hot water temperature was 73.9 degrees F in the sink.During an observation on 04/22/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 18 (Resident #2, 3, 4, 33) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 that included her Diagnoses of Anxiety and Major Depressive Disorder. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 that included smoking cigarettes. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 that included orders for flushing her Gastrostomy tube This failure could place residents at risk of infection, injury, unmet psychosocial needs and not receiving needed care to maintain optimal level of physical and emotional health. Findings included: Resident #2Record review of Resident #2 face sheet, dated 4/24/26, on 4/24/26 revealed a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well-balanced diet to meet the daily nutritional and special dietary needs for 21 of 73 residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility did not provide 21 residents on a regular diet who were supposed to be served refried beans for lunch or offer a comparable substitute when they ran out of refried beans. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and possible weight Findings included:Record review of the posted menu dated 4/21/26 revealed the following menu for a regular diet. Soft tacos, refried beans, tortilla soup and Brownie. Observation of food preparation and service in the kitchen on 4/21/26 at 11:21 am revealed that the facility failed to have enough refried beans or a comparable substitute which resulted in 21 residents not receiving refried beans. After 17 residents were served their tray without refried beans, the Dietary Manager provided rice to the 4 last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 kitchen as evidence by: The facility failed to ensure:A. The floors throughout the kitchen were clean and free from dirt and food crumbs. B. The stand that the mixer was on was clean and free from dirt and food crumbs. C. The plastic container that contained the food thickener was free from spilled food and not soiled. D. The convection oven and stove were clean on the inside and outside. E. The shelf above the stove was clean and not soiled with food crumbs and dust. F. The refrigerator was clean and free of food crumbs and dust. G. The stand that held the residents' plates was clean and free of food crumbs. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness, compromised nutritional health status, and being served food items that may not be fresh, taste stale, or be contaminated.In an observation on 4/21/26 at 9:13 am, during the initial tour of kitchen, the floors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 19 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility failed to ensure the assessment information in Resident #4' s admission MDS, dated [DATE], was accurate. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care and services due to inaccurate assessment records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's electronic face sheet, dated 04/24/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and nontraumatic cerebral hemorrhage (a type of stroke caused by bleeding in the brain). Record review of Resident #4's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/14/2026,0n 04/24/2026 reflected a BIMS score of 00 indicating she was severely cognitively impaired. Further review reflected Resident #4 had gastrostomy tube (a tube placed directly in the stomach through the abdominal wall to deliver nutrition, fluids and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #33) of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's indwelling urinary catheter tubing was secured to her leg, and her catheter bag was emptied every shift. These failures could place residents at risk of catheter tubing leakage, resulting in cross-contamination and development of infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's electronic face sheet, dated 04/24/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (urinary bladder does not function properly due to trauma, disease, or injury to the nervous system) and UTI (bladder infection). Record review of Resident #33's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/05/2026, reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized for 1 of 19 (Resident #54) residents reviewed for nursing assessments. The facility failed to ensure readmission Assessment was included in the medical record for Resident #54 after hospitalization on 4/18/2026 per facility policy.This failure could put residents at risk of records not being completed and staff not having all information needed to provide quality care to its residents.Findings included:Record review of Resident #54'a electronic face sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diastolic congestive heart failure (left lower chamber in the heart cannot fill with blood properly reducing blood flow to the body), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that can prevent the heart from pumping blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments during medication storage inspection for 1 (medication Cart #1) of 1 medication cart reviewed for storage. The facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked and secured while unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of drug diversion.Findings included:During an observation on 10/14/2025 at 1:00 PM, medication cart #1 was observed unlocked outside of the nurse's station, prior to entering the hallway. Residents and staff were observed approximately within 10 feet of the cart out of eyesight from staff, with unlocked drawers facing outward. On top of the unsupervised cart were observed a butter knife, nail clippers, mouth wash and an unopened package of petrolatum dressing. The top drawers were observed as having glucometers, lancets, lab draw kits with included needles, hand sanitizer, zinc oxide skin protectant creams, and moisture barrier creams. The second drawer contained OTC medications such as Milk of Magnesia, cough suppressant,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives in the areas of Hospice, Encephalopathy, Seborrheic dermatitis, Anxiety Disorder, Trisomy 21, Hepatitis B, Hyperlipidemia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, without esophagitis, Fatty Live, and Unspecified Convulsions, Dementia for Resident #1. 2. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that included but not limited to a nurse aide with the responsibility for the resident for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the nurse aides with responsibility for the residents were invited and attended the resident care plan conferences. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the care and services to meet their needs.The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Facesheet, dated 07/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date into the facility of 05/08/2025. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included Encephalopathy (a broad range of conditions that cause brain dysfunction, leading to altered consciousness, cognitive impairment, and neurological symptoms), unspecified. Record review of Resident #1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitization. 1. The facility failed to ensure ground meat was thawed properly. 2. The facility failed to ensure the cook performed hand hygiene appropriately when preparing food. 3. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed and/or labeled properly. 4. The facility failed to ensure the foods were not stored past expiration date. Thess failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for contamination and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: During an observation of the kitchen on 01/19/2025 between 2:15 p.m. - 2:50 p.m. revealed the following: Sink: 1 plastic dish sitting in a sink with 4 tubes of ground meat sitting vertically in the dish that was filled with water and water running into the container. The ground meat was not submerged in the water with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident's representative had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he/ she preferred for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #29 and Resident #44) reviewed for antipsychotic consents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 or their representative signed consent for antipsychotic medication Seroquel (quetiapine) (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia) prior to administering medication and after dosage increased and prior to administering new dosage ordered by physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's or their representative signed consent for antipsychotic medication Seroquel (quetiapine) prior to administering medication. These failures could affect residents by placing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 of 23 residents (Residents #23, #26, #36, #39, #53, and #62) reviewed for care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to define measurable objectives on Resident #23's care plan regarding the problems of resisting care, visual function, oral hygiene, pain, mobility, cognitive loss, and daily tasks. 2. The facility failed to define measurable objectives on Resident #26's care plan regarding the problems of psychotropic drugs, psychosocial well-being, pain, mood, behaviors, activities of daily living and daily tasks. 3. The facility failed to define measurable objectives on Resident #36's care plan regarding the problems of mobility and daily tasks and failed to address on Resident #36's comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for 5 (Resident #5, Resident #17, Resident #22, Resident #43, and Resident #49) of 23 residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #17's personal refrigerator did not have expired goods stored and failed to log refrigerator's temperatures. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #43's personal refrigerator had a thermometer inside to check temperature and failed to log refrigerator ' s temperatures. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #22's personal refrigerator had temperature log during the month of February 2025 (last checked on 1/14/2025). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #5 ' s personal refrigerator had temperature log during the month of February 2025 (last checked on 1/22/2025). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #49 ' s personal refrigerator had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for (Resident #169) 1 of 23 resident's rooms observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #169 ' s toilet was free from cracks at the base and was sturdily attached to the floor. The facility's failure placed the residents at risk for diminished quality of life, discomfort, and safety. The findings included: Record review of Resident #169's electronic face sheet dated 02/19/2025 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently on 02/01/2025 with diagnoses to include: right foot drop (difficulty lifting the front part of the right foot and foot might drag on the floor when walking), muscle wasting and atrophy (breakdown of muscle fibers), muscle weakness, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #169's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 (Resident #17) of 23 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure medications were not left in Resident #17 ' s personal refrigerator. This failure could result in unauthorized persons having access to medication that was not intended for them or drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 02/17/2025 at 11:42 a.m., Resident #17 ' s personal refrigerator had a bottle of prescription hydrocortisone (a steroid topical solution used for skin irritation) cream inside of the refrigerator with expiration date of 02/08/2025. Resident #17 stated just throw it away, I do not want anyone to get into trouble. Record review of Resident #17 ' s quarterly MDS dated [DATE] Section M – Skin Conditions revealed Resident #17 had intact skin with no pressure ulcers or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #18) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B used the required PPE for Resident #18, (gown) who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to her Foley Catheter while performing Foley Catheter Care on 02/19/25. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet, dated 2/18/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 2/15/19. Resident #1 had a diagnosis which included dementia, disorder of urinary system, and type 2 diabetes mellites. Record review of Resident #18's MDS dated [DATE] with a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] indicated BIMS of 8,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the residents a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #8) reviewed for the right of a homelike physical environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #8's bathrooms were free live cockroaches, and the air conditioner window unit filters were free of being clogged with lint. The failures placed residents at risk of an unsanitary and uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's Facesheet, dated 12/18/2024, revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date into the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included Cerebral infraction, unspecified (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to damage to the brain tissue without a specific cause), Generalized anxiety disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by excessive, persistent,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law procedures for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency when a family member of Resident #3 alleged Resident #3 had been abused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated and prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. 1. The Administrator failed to investigate an alleged allegation of abuse when a family member of Resident #3 alleged Resident #3 had been abused by CNA B. 2. The facility failed to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment by allowing CNA B to remain on duty after the facility became of aware of the alleged allegation of abuse. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect by not investigating and implementing preventive measures. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's Facesheet, dated 12/18/2024, revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date into the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included Cerebral infraction, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effect pest control program to keep the facility free of roaches for two (2) common areas, and for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #8) reviewed for pest control program. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of roaches The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 and Resident #8's bathrooms were free live cockroaches This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Finding include: Record review of Resident #3's Facesheet, dated 12/18/2024, revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date into the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included Cerebral infraction, unspecified (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to damage to the brain tissue without a specific cause), Generalized anxiety disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized by excessive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 16 resident reviewed for abuse or neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency allegations of Abuse and Neglect when learning of an elopement of Resident #1. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not having incidents of abuse and neglect being reviewed and investigated in a timely manner by the facility and State Survey Agency. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the discharge was necessary for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided a discharge in writing 2. The facility failed to document a discharge summary. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2 electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis Anxiety, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Dysuria , Hypertension, Altered Mental Status, acquired absence of right leg below knee, Acquired absence of left leg below knee. Record review of Resident's #2 Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: Section C Cognitive Patterns #2's BIMS Score was 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section E Wandering behavior was not exhibited. Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan contained interventions that addressed his need for supervision for wandering. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/24/2024 revealed [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (body does not make enough insulin or does not use insulin well), hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed the have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and determined by considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population with accordance with 1 of 1 facility reviewed for sufficient staffing The facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing based off of facility assessment. This failure could place the residents at risk of resident's needs, safety and psychosocial well-being not being met. The findings include: During an observation on 04/09/2024 at 9:45 a.m. staffing posting for 4/9/2024 revealed: census was 78 and there were 3 LVNs (36 hours) and 4 CNAs (48 hours) scheduled 12 hours on both day and night shift. Unit 1 had 2 LVNs and 3 CNAs working at this time with 61 residents. Unit 2, a secured unit, had 1 LVN and 1 CNA working at this time with 16 residents. Total of hours scheduled to be worked during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the nessary care and services to attain the highest practicable, physicial, mental, and psychosocial well-being consisted for 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #12) of 12 residents reviewed for quality of life The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 received showers per resident's request. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 transferred from bed to chair per resident's request. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation. Findings included: Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 04/09/2024 revealed [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] and the following diagnoses: candida stomatitis (yeast causing inflammation inside the mouth), cough, acute upper respiratory infection, pneumonia, osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) right ankle and foot, nicotine dependence (smokes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately assess the residents' status for 4 (Resident #4, Resident #30, Resident #54, and Resident #324) of 6 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility did not accurately indicate on Resident #4, Resident #30, or Resident #54's MDS (Minimum Data Set) the results of a Brief Interview for Mental Status evaluation. The facility did not accurately indicate on Resident #324's MDS a urinary tract infection. These failures could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate or inappropriate care and services . Findings included: Review of Resident #4's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of major depression, bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes extreme shifts in mood), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness similar to schizophrenia but with added features that affect mood), and a history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives that have the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Resident #5, Resident #30, Resident #54, and Resident #65) of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop care plans based on assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in areas such as bathing, impaired decision making related to insulin dosage, skin breakdown, adverse consequences related to antipsychotic medications, adverse consequences related to antianxiety medication, disruptive behaviors, keeping food and dirty dishes in her room, cognitive loss, compliance with medications and self-care, medication administration time preference, non-participation in activities, communication, elopement risk, PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail and assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #7, Resident #10, and Resident #13) reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to assess residents for entrapment risks and attempt less restrictive measures prior to installing bed rails. These failures could place residents at risk for injury. The findings include: Resident #7 Record review of Resident #7's undated electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended and uncontrollable body movements), left shoulder pain, lack of coordination, and weakness. Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: Section C (Cognitive Patterns) BIMS assessment revealed a score of 14 meaning cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance as well as failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal observed. The facility failed to provide a lunch meal that was flavorful and palatable. These failures can place residents at risk for weight loss. Findings Include: During an observation on 12/20/2023 at 11:41 AM, test meal arrived at 11:55 am. The meal consisted of Salisbury steak, cauliflower and broccoli vegetable mix, potato wedges, and a roll. The Salisbury steak and the cauliflower and broccoli vegetable mix was not flavorful and palatable. During an interview on 12/20/2023 at 3:30pm, DON stated that the meal was not flavorful and palatable. DON stated that if the food was more palatable, the residents would possibly eat more. DON stated that with the food not being flavorful and palatable, the residents could lose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The facility failed to ensure that opened food was labeled and dated with date open. These failures place residents at risk for food borne illness Findings include: During observation on 12/18/2023 at 10:10 AM the facility kitchen revealed: Pantry: 1. One clear gallon bag that contained an opened bag of chips not labeled and no open date. 2. One clear gallon bag that contained an opened bag of what was labeled Tostitos with date received of 11/08 , and no open date. 3. One opened box labeled corn starch had an date received of 10/25, and no open date. Freezer #1: 1. One opened box labeled Homestyle Dinner Rolls had an in date 12/06, and no open date. 2, One opened box labeled Bread sticks had an in date 12/13, and no open date. 3. One opened box labeled Omelets had an in date 12/13, and no open date. Refrigerator #1: 1. One opened 5 lb bag labeled parmesan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain infection control protocols to prevent infections for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #27) observed for catheter care needs. The facility failed to ensure CNA A used a peri-care cleaning wipe and cleaned catheter tubing toward the resident and not away toward catheter bag to clean catheter tubing. These failures place residents at risk for unnecessary infections while in the facility. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #27's undated electronic face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility originally on 02/15/2019 and most recently on 03/06/2023, with a diagnoses of urinary tract infection. Record Review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed no BIMS score (test to determine cognitive status) and Section H (Bladder and Bowel) revealed resident had an indwelling catheter. Record Review of Resident #27's comprehensive care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, and maintain an account of all controlled drugs for 1 of 24 controlled medications reviewed for security. The facility failed to ensure hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325mg, a prescribed narcotic medication, was secured. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed narcotic medications and pain. Findings were: Record Review of the Provider Investigation Form 3613-A dated 10/13/2023 revealed on 10/06/2023 at 8:30 p.m., there were 180 tablets of hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325mg missing from the medication cart. Further review of Form 3613-A revealed the facility reviewed all medication counts for the resident since admission, and all medication carts were assessed to ensure medications were not placed in a different cart. The resident was discharged on the same day as the discovery of the missing medication and the resident was contacted to see if the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured in accordance with currently accepted professional principals for 1 of 24 controlled medications reviewed for security. The facility failed to ensure hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325mg, a prescribed narcotic medication, was secured. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed narcotic medications and pain. Findings were: Record Review of the Provider Investigation Form 3613-A dated 10/13/2023 revealed on 10/06/2023 at 8:30 p.m., there were 180 tablets of hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325mg missing from the medication cart. Further review of Form 3613-A revealed the facility reviewed all medication counts for the resident since admission, and all medication carts were assessed to ensure medications were not placed in a different cart. The resident was discharged on the same day as the discovery of the missing medication and the resident was contacted to see if the resident was discharged with the medication and advertently and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-04-24 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility, with a capacity of more than 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified staffing. The facility failed to ensure they had a full-time licensed Social Worker. This failure could affect all residents of the facility by placing them at increased risk of psychosocial decline and poor quality of life. Findings included:During an interview on 04/23/2026 at 09:30 a.m., the SSD stated she was working to get her license in the state of Texas. She stated she had a master's degree in social work from [NAME] Rico and then was licensed in the state of New York. She stated she was working with the state of Texas to get reciprocity (licensure by endorsement) but was not licensed at this time. She stated she had been working for the facility performing Social Work duties since December of 2025. She stated she had corporate support, but she did not come to the facility and all communication was over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-21 · tag F0570 — widespread
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to purchase a surety bond, or otherwise provide assurance satisfactory to the Secretary, to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility for 1 of 1 surety bonds reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that the facility's $60,000.00 surety bond was enough to cover the $71,340.82 total residents' trust fund account balance. This deficient practice could affect all residents who deposited personal funds with the facility, and place residents at-risk of their personal funds not being assured. The Findings included: During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 11:24 AM the ADMN stated the average balance of the resident trust fund for the past 3 months was $71,340.82. The ADMN stated her expectation was the surety bond should have covered the funds in the trust fund. The ADMN stated corporate was responsible to manage the surety bond and trust funds. The ADMN stated the effect on residents could have been residents not able to get their money. The ADMN stated she was not sure what led to the failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to make sure that the comprehensive care plan is prepared by a team that included the attending physician and a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident for 16 of 16 residents (Resident #26, #6, #10, #34, # 28, #4, #54, #13, #32, #57, #30, #65, #7, #14, #29, #18) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the attending physicians and nurse aides with responsibility for the residents were invited and attended the resident care plan conferences. These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services to meet their needs Findings include: Resident #26 Review of Resident #26's electronic facesheet revealed resident was [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of quadriplegia. Review of Resident #26's comprehensive quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #26's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-21 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility, with a capacity of more than 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. The facility failed to ensure facility had a full-time social worker. This failure could affect all residents of the facility by placing them at increased risk of psychosocial decline and poor quality of life. The findings included: During an interview on 12/20/23 at 03:30 PM the SW stated she was a corporate social worker. The SW stated she worked part time at facility and was only there maybe 20 hours per week. The SW stated she was also responsible for several other facilities. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 10:18 AM the ADMN stated her expectation was to have a full-time social worker but had not been able to hire a social worker. The ADMN stated the corporate SW was in the building weekly. The ADMN stated the facility had not had a full-time social worker since the end of August of 2023. The ADMN stated she did not think there was a negative effect on residents, she felt that the cooperate SW was covering and had filled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 6 of 6 days reviewed for RN Coverage. The facility failed to provide evidence a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 6 days (08/05/23, 08/06/23,08/19/23, 09/02/23, 09/03/23 and 09/30/23) of the FY Quarter 4 2023 (July1- September 30) out of 4 Quarters. This failure could place residents at risk for altered physical, mental, and psychological well-being due to decisions that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring the direct care staff. The Findings included: Record review of the facility's Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 4 2023 revealed no RN coverage on 08/05/23, 08/06/23,08/19/23, 09/02/23, 09/03/23 and 09/30/23. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 10:18 AM the ADMN stated her expectation was to have 8 hours of RN coverage daily. The ADMN stated the DON and ADON were responsible to schedule and ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$184,619 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $171,377 — penalty dated 2024-10-13
  • $13,242 — penalty dated 2024-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MURRELL, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
1751 N 15TH ST OPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
LEDFORD, WANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
MARTINEZ IRIZARRY, AXELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
1751 N 15TH ST PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 3%Other / private 18%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$243per resident / day
operating cost
$7,376per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$195per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675746. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next