Avir At Bay City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 77.4 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 resident of 17 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess Resident #1, who was prescribed daily anticoagulant medication, before lifting her up off the floor when she had an unwitnessed fall and sustained facial injuries and a bleeding hematoma to the back of her head. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/22/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:22 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 02/24/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective. These failures placed residents who experience falls with injuries at risk of further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure all residents were provided with a discharge summary for an anticipated discharge for two (CR #1 and CR #3) of six residents reviewed for discharge requirements. -CR #1 was discharged on 8/16/23 to a hotel and facility failed to provide CR#1 with Post-Discharge Plan of Care. -CR #3 was discharged on 8/23/2023 with no documentation of any pre-discharge planning, discharge summary, and an incomplete plan. On 8/25/2023 at 2:17 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified for discharges. While the IJ was lowered on 8/29/2023 at 10:29 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of further unsafe discharge and potential physical, mental, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings include: CR #1 On 08/24/23 at 12:05 p.m. CR# 1 was observed asleep in a local hospital room. He had an IV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions in accordance with professional standards for 4 of 8 medication carts reviewed for medication storage in that: Medication Carts #1, #2, #3 and #4 contained medications that did not have an open date written on the bottles. The failure to date opened medications placed residents at risk for receiving expired, contaminated, or ineffective medications which could result in medication errors, infection, delayed treatment or adverse drug outcome.Findings:On 2/25/2026 at 10:20 a.m., during a medication storage observation of Medication Cart #1 located on the 400 Hall, in the presence of the DON and RN I, the following medications were observed without a documented date indicating when the medications were opened: Valproic acid solution 250/5ml. (used to treat various types of seizure disorders). Dayquil, Severe Cold and flu…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to document evidence of receiving or refusal of influenza or pneumococcal immunization for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident#12, Resident #2, Resident #39, Resident #7, and Resident #5). The facility failed to document evidence in the electronic medical record the offering or the refusal of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization status for Resident #12 and Resident #2. The facility failed to document evidence in the electronic medical record the offering or the refusal of the pneumococcal immunization status for Resident #7, Resident #39, and Resident #5. The failures could place residents at risk of contracting viral illness, influenza or pneumococcal disease, or of not being informed of the benefits and risk which could cause respiratory complications and lead to potential adverse health outcomes. Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 2/26/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted into the facility on 2/12/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure residents were offered, received, or refused Covid-19 immunization, for 3 of 5 residents who were reviewed for immunization compliance. (Resident #12, Resident #7, and Resident#2). The facility failed to document in Resident #12, Resident #7, and Resident #2's electronic medical records for having received or having had not received the Covid-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal.This failure could place residents at risk of not being informed of complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 2/26/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted into the facility on 2/12/2026 with diagnoses that included Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart beat), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body's cells do not respond properly to insulin leading to high blood sugar levels), Hypertensive Heart Disease with heart failure (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record the facility failed to review and revised the person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #22) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions.The facility failed to update Resident #22's care plan to reflect the status of Resident #22's NPO status. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and interventions they need. Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 2/26/2026 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility originally on 8/7/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a progressive movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time), Dysphagia Oropharyngeal phase (the inability to swallow food or drink), and Unspecified Dementia (a decline in cognitive function affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities).Record review of Resident #22's Order Summary dated 2/26/2026 revealed a dietary order of a NPO diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week reviewed for RN coverage for 5 of 30 days reviewed for nursing services. (11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24 and 11/30/24). The facility failed to have an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week for 5 days from November 9, 2024, through November 10, 2024, November 23, 2024, through November 24, 2024, and November 30, 2024. This failure could place residents at risk of lack of nursing oversight and a higher level of care. Findings included: Record review of a Detailed Calculated Time form from 11/1/24 through 11/30/24 indicating RN hours worked indicated no RN hours for 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/23/24, and 11/24/24. The report indicated less than 8 hours a day worked on 11/30/24- 2.25 hours. Further review of the report indicated the DON did not work any hours on 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/23/24, 11/24/24, and 11/30/2024. Record Review of the facility's Civil Rights form (3761) (Texas Health and Human Services form that list the facility staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #45) of 25 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's medications were reordered timely to prevent the medications being unavailable for administration to the resident. The facility failed to administer two doses of Hydrocodone-acetaminophen- Schedule II tablet; 10-325 mg; oral on 12/04/2024 at 1 AM and 7 AM for Resident #11. The facility failed to monitor the blood pressure and pulse before administering Diltiazem (a blood pressure (BP) medication given to control high blood pressure and chest pain) and Amiodarone (prevents fast or irregular heartbeat) to Resident #45 as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to monitor the blood pressure and pulse before administering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure on 12/03/2024 at 8:15 AM that a container of bacon grease, chicken noodle soup and French toast were labeled and dated with the preparation date and expiration date. The facility failed to ensure a bag of open tortillas was sealed. The facility failed to ensure the label on the ground beef in the freezer was legible. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of serious complications from foodborne illness because of their compromised health status. Record review of Food Receiving and Storage policy dated November 2022 read in part . Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 1. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled, and dated (use by date). 7. Refrigerated foods are labeled, dated, and monitored so they are used by their use-by date, frozen, or discarded .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the coordination of assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program was provided for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR screenings (Resident #49). The facility did not correctly identify Resident #49 as having mental illness in his PASRR Level 1 Screening. This failure could place residents with documented mental illness diagnoses at risk of not receiving needed care and services in the appropriate setting. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, not dated revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality), scabies (a contagious skin condition caused by microscopic mites), muscle weakness, Dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7% based on 2 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 1 of 4 residents (Residents #45) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA A administered the correct dose of Clonazepam to Resident #45. 2. The MA failed to administer Methimazole to Resident #45 according to physician orders and administered the medication after meal instead of before meal. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of prescribed medications. Findings include: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 12/05/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to carry out daily tasks:),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 1 (Resident #69) of 5 resident reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA A, used appropriate PPE during urinary catheter care to Resident #69. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 12/03/2024 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], age [AGE] years old. Resident #69 had a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of liver (a cancerous tumor that can start in the liver or spread to the liver from another part of the body). Record review of Resident #69 doctor's order dated 11/19/2024 revealed that Resident was ordered Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Foley Catheter. Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$23,689 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-02-26
• $10,062 — penalty dated 2023-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX