Avir at Bellville
106 N Baron, Bellville, TX 77418 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (979) 865-3689 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.59 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 50.0 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value and flavor and served for palatability for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #17, #26, #30, #41, and #48) reviewed for nutrition.- The facility failed to use nutrient-dense liquids (such as broth or sauces) on 05/06/2026 during lunch preparation by adding water to pureed food to thin tater-tot casserole and bread.These failures place residents at risk for decreased meal consumption, unintentional weight loss and malnutrition, unpalatable food, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia or choking. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet reflected, resident was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident's diagnosis included cognitive communication deficit (disrupt a person's ability to communicate effectively, despite intact language or speech abilities), dizziness and giddiness (lightheadedness), weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety on 05/05/2026 in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. - The facility failed to ensure 6-fruit cups and personal size water bottle in 1 of 2 refrigerators were labeled and dated during the initial kitchen tour on 05/05/2026 to identify when the items was placed.- The facility failed to store a clean cooking pot and storage container lid off the floor on 05/05/2026 away from the collection of floor dirt, dust and debris'.- The facility failed to store a used flyswatter on 05/05/2026 away from the servicing and food preparation table. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to foodborne illness and disease. Findings Include: During an observation of the facility's initial kitchen tour on 05/05/2026 at 05:56 a.m., revealed the following: - A tray containing 5-cups of apple sauce and 1-cup of pairs not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 25 days (10/05/2024, 10/06/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024, 10/13/2024, 10/14/2024, 10/19/2024, 10/20/2024, 10/21/2024, 10/26/2024, 10/27/2024, 11/02/2024, 11/03/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/10/2024, 11/16/2024, 11/17/2024, 11/23/2024, 11/24/2024, 11/28/2024, 11/30/2024, 12/01/2024, 12/14/2024, and 12/15/2024) of the 6-month review period, reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the facility maintained the required RN coverage for 25 days between October 2024 to March 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Review of CMS PBJ staffing reports, from October 2024 to December 2024, reflected the facility triggered for no RN hours for FY 4th Quarter 2024 (October 2024 to December 2024). Review of the facility RN schedule from January 2025 to March 2025 revealed the facility did not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #5 and #97) and 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. There was one medication (Ketoconazole cream for fungal or yeast infection) expired on 08/2022 found on Resident #5's nightstand in the resident's room on 03/18/2025. 2. Medication aide-B administered Resident #97's Cyclosporine 0.05% eye drop for increasing tear production two drops to the resident's each eye on 03/20/2025. However, the physician order indicated Cyclosporine 0.05% one drop into both eyes. 3. In the medication room, a. There was one medication (Hydrocortisone cream for fast itch and rash relief) expired on 02/2025 found inside the medication room on 03/19/2025. b. There were total 14 Intell-Swab covid-19 rapid home test for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service. The facility failed to ensure that items stored in the reach-in refrigerator were labeled after opened or prepared. The facility failed to ensure that items stored in the chest freezer were labeled after opened. These failures could place residents who receive food prepared in the facility's only kitchen by placing them at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. Findings included: Observation of the facility's reach-in refrigerator on 03/18/2025 at 9:17 AM revealed one 1 gallon of milk opened and unlabeled. Observation of the facility's chest freezer on 03/18/2025 at 9:19 AM revealed one box with a bag of rolls open and undated and one box with a bag of French toast open and undated. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 03/18/2025 at 9:23 AM revealed items being stored in the refrigerator and freezer were to be labeled with date they were opened. The Dietary Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 9 (RN E, Dietary Aide F, Housekeeper G, CNA H, Activity Manager I, LVN J, LVN K, LVN L, DON) of 20 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured Dietary Aide F and DON received required trainings upon hire. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured required trainings were provided to Housekeeper G, CNA H, Activity Manager I, LVN J, LVN K, and LVN L annually. The facility failed to implement and maintain a training program that ensured required trainings were provided to RN E annually. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of the personnel records for RN E revealed a hire date of 04/24/2023. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for RN E, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of it's QAPI program for 6 (RN E, Housekeeper G, CNA H, LVN J, LVN L and DON) of 20 employees reviewed for training requirements. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to RN E, Housekeeper G, CNA H, LVN J, LVN L annually. The facility failed to ensure required trainings were provided to the DON upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by staff who have been insufficiently trained. Findings include: Record review of the personnel records for RN E revealed a hire date of 04/24/2023. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for RN E, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of QAPI training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for the Housekeeper G revealed a hire date of 06/15/2022. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for Housekeeper G, provided by the Administrator revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on ethics training for 3 of 20 employees (Housekeeper G, LVN J, and LVN K) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure ethics training was provided to Housekeeper G, LVN J, and LVN K annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of the personnel records for the Housekeeper G revealed a hire date of 06/15/2022. Further review of a training log from the last 12 months for Housekeeper G, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of ethics training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for LVN J revealed a hire date of 11/04/2022. Further review of a training log from the last 12 months for LVN J, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of ethics training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for LVN K revealed a hire date of 06/01/2022. Further review of a training log from the last 12 months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training consistent with the requirements at §483.40 and as determined by the facility assessment at §483.71 for 3 of 20 employees (Activity Manager, RN E, LVN L) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure behavioral health training was provided to Activity Manager, RN E, LVN L annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for the Activity Manager revealed a hire date of 06/01/2022. Further review of a training log from the past 12 months for Activity Manager, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of behavior health training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for the RN E revealed a hire date of 04/24/2023. Further review of a training log from the last 12 months for RN E, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of behavior health training being provided annually. Record review of personnel records for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #11 and #96) reviewed for assessments: 1. Resident #11's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], identified the resident had insulin. However, Resident #11 did not have insulin. 2. Resident #96's admission MDS, dated [DATE], identified the resident was always continent for urinary bladder. However, Resident #96 had an indwelling urinary catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), type 2 diabetes mellitus (not control blood sugar in the body), muscle weakness, anemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, and described services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's care plan reflected her oxygen status and included a care plan regarding how to take care of the resident's oxygen. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #16 ) reviewed for incontinence care. When CNA-C was providing incontinent care to Resident #16 on 03/19/2025, the CNA-C did not clean the resident's suprapubic area (the area of the abdomen located below the umbilical region). This failures could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), hypertension (high blood pressure),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for enteral nutrition. When RN-E administered a medication via gastrostomy tube to Resident #26, RN-E did not check residual by aspiration of gastric content of the resident. This failure could place residents with gastrostomy tube at risk for complications, aspiration, and pneumonia. Findings included: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (not enough protein and energy to meet nutritional needs), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (stomach acid repeatedly flows back up), and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting or thinning of muscle mass). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 2 of 2 nursing staff (CNA-C and CNA-D) reviewed for competencies. The facility did not perform CNA-C and CNA-D's annual skill check-off. This failure could place the residents at risk for receiving care by staff who do not have the training and competency needed for providing care. The findings included: Record review of CNA-C and CNA-D's employee profiles revealed CNA-C was hired to the facility on [DATE], and CNA-D was hired on 05/25/2023. CNA-C did not have skill check-off for perineal care upon hiring date, and CNA-D did not have skill check-off for perineal care in 2024. Observation on 03/19/2025 at 2:08 p.m. revealed CNA-C opened Resident #16's old and dirty brief and cleaned the resident's penis, and then cleaned the left and right groin area. CNA-C and CNA-D turned the resident to his left side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8% based on 2 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved two residents (Residents #10 and #97) of five residents reviewed for medication errors. 1. Medication aide-B administered fiber laxative calcium polycarbophil 625 mg one tablet for constipation to Resident #10 on 03/19/2025, but the physician order indicated Metamucil (psyllium husk) 0.4-gram one capsule for constipation. 2. Medication aide-B administered Resident #97's Cyclosporine 0.05% eye drop for increasing tear production two drops to the resident's each eye on 03/20/2025. However, the physician order indicated Cyclosporine 0.05% one drop into both eyes. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications or not receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings include: Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #5) and 1 nursing carts (C-unit nursing cart) out of 2 nursing carts reviewed for storage. 1. Ketoconazole cream for fungal or yeast infection was found on Resident #5's nightstand in the resident's room on [DATE]. 2. The C-unit nursing cart was left open and unattended by RN -E. These failures could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed mediations. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was an [AGE] year old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problem with the blood vessels that supply it), type 2 diabetes mellitus (not control blood sugar in the body), muscle wasting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Resident #13) of 14 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #13's personal refrigerator located in her room observed on 03/18/2025, revealed an unknown food wrapped with papers inside the freezer, with no date and no label. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which might be spoiled. The findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year old female and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hyperlipidemia (high level of fat), dementia (loss memory or problem solving and other thinking abilities), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue and strength), and Alzheimer's disease (destroy memory and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 resident (Residents #16) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control practices. When CNA-C was providing perineal care to Resident #16, the CNA-C touched new and clean brief with old and dirty gloves after cleaning the resident's buttock area. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 03/21/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), hypertension (high blood pressure), hypokalemia (low potassium in the blood), muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 3 air filters (B-hall air filter) reviewed for environmental concerns. The air filter located B-hall, observed on 03/19/2025, was very dirty with gray colored thickened dust. It was last changed on 04/02/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and respiratory status due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. The findings included: Observation on 03/18/2025 at 3:16 p.m. revealed there was an air filter on B-hall. The air filter was very dirty with gray colored thickened dust. Further observation revealed the air filter was dated 04/02/2024. Interview on 03/19/2025 at 3:26 p.m., Maintenance stated the air filter located B-hall was observed to be very dirty with gray colored thickened dust, and was last changed on 04/02/2024. Maintenance said he was responsible for changing air filters and was supposed to change them every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective training on communications training for 2 of 20 employees (Housekeeper G and LVN K) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure effective communication training was provided to Housekeeper G and LVN K annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of the personnel records for the Housekeeper G revealed a hire date of 06/15/2022. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for Housekeeper G, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of communication training being provided annually. Record review of the personnel records for LVN K revealed a hire date of 06/01/2022. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for LNV K, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of communication training being provided annually. Interview with the Administrator, on 03/21/2025 at 4:25 PM revealed communication trainings were available to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include as part of its infection prevention and control program mandatory training that includes the written standards, policies, and procedures for the program for 1 of 20 employees (RN E) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program training was provided RN E annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of the personnel records for RN E revealed a hire date of 04/24/2023. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for RN E, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of Infection control training being provided annually. Interview with the Administrator, on 03/21/2025 at 4:25 PM revealed annual Infection prevention trainings were available to employees via CEU360 and assigned by corporate. The Administrator stated new employees received training in house from the BOM prior to working the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective in-service training for nurse aides on dementia for 1 of 5 nurse aides (CNA H) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure dementia training was provided CNA H annually. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings include: Record review of personnel records for CNA H revealed a hire date of 07/13/2023. Further review of a training log from the previous 12 months for CNA H, provided by the Administrator revealed no evidence of Dementia training being provided annually. Interview with the Administrator, on 03/21/2025 at 4:25 PM revealed annual trainings were available to employees via CEU360 and assigned by corporate. The Administrator stated new employees received training in house from the BOM prior to working the floor. The Administrator stated current employees received emails informing them of assigned dementia trainings that are due to be completed. The Administrator stated it is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week from 11/1/2023 to 11/30/2023 for a total of 30 days, 12/1/2023 to 12/31/2023 for a total of 31 days and 1/1/2024 to 1/23/2024 for a total of 23 days, reviewed for RN coverage. The facility had no DON from 7/25/2023 to 9/26/2023 and from 12/26/2023 to 1/26/2024. These failures placed the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required and RN to make in the management of the resident's healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff. The findings included: Record review of employee files r evealed employment dates of the two previous DON's as: DON A 8/31/2022 to 7/25/2023 DON B 9/6/2023 to 12/26/2023 Record review of facility time stamps revealed facility had no RN coverage: 11/1/2023 to 11/30/2023. 12/1/2023 to 12/31/2023. 1/1/2024 to 1/23/2024. Record review on 1/26/2024 revealed facility census was 38 . In an interview on 1/26/2024 at 8:30am with the Regional Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure bulk foods were stored in a manner to prevent contamination. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed and/or labeled properly in refrigerators. The facility failed to ensure refrigerators maintained a temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: 1/23/24 Entered kitchen for initial observation. 8:55 Am Refrigerator #1 had a temperature of 51 degrees. 8:55 AM Refrigerator #2 had no thermometer. 9:02 AM observation of Freezer #2 revealed it contained: 1 cardboard box of food not labeled, sealed, or dated;. 1 plastic bag of bacon not labeled, sealed, or dated;. 1 plastic bag of tomato-based sauce not labeled or dated;. 1 plastic bag of chicken strips not labeled or dated. 9:57 AM observation of Refrigerator #1 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accidents hazards for 4 (Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #26, Resident #30 ) of 5 residents, reviewed for accidents hazards This failure placed residents at risk of injury for accidents or hazard. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's orders revealed Resident #25 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic shortness of breath and cough), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle), cough, unsteadiness on feet, colostomy status (opening for the large intestine in the stomach). Record review of Resident # 25's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #25 required supervision with eating, oral hygiene, and showering/bathing. Resident #25 was independent with upper body dressing, lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and used a wheelchair and walker for ambulating. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 4 of 4 dietary support staff Dietary Aide W, [NAME] S, [NAME] R, and Dietary Aide T reviewed for competencies. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] S, [NAME] R, Dietary Aide T, and Dietary Aide W had a current Food Handling Certificate while working in the facility kitchen. This failure could place residents who consume food prepared in the facility kitchen at risk of foodborne illness due to being served by improperly trained staff. The findings included: Record review of Dietary Aide W's personnel file information revealed Dietary Aide W was a part-time aide, with a hire date of 12/23/23. No documentation of a food handler's certificate was found in Dietary Aide W's personnel information provided to surveyor. Observation on 1/23/2023 at 11:30 AM revealed [NAME] S was ladling food onto plates and placing the plates on trays with the assistance of [NAME] R. Dietary Aide T was pouring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 3 of 13 Residents (Resident #27, #22 and #20) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to properly clean/maintain resident #27, #22 and #20's rooms in a sanitary manner. This failure could place residents at risk of unsanitary conditions, psychosocial decline, spread infections which could result in a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of resident #27's face sheet dated 1/25/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, dementia, Cellulitis (infection involving the skin of the lower limbs) and history of diarrhea. Record review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 1 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required partial/moderate assistance with toileting, and he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of five residents (Resident #28) reviewed for care plans The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's comprehensive care plan addressed the residents individual need for the use of a CPAP (a non-invasive ventilation therapy used to facilitate breathing). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate or unnecessary interventions not individualized to their health care needs. Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 01/23/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a stroke, allergy, aphasia (a comprehension and communication disorder), acute respiratory disease, pneumonia, shortness of breath,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for Quality of Care in that: -Nurse Aide F provided services outside the scope of practice of a NA by administering a topical medication to Resident #28's wound. -the ADON delegated outside the scope of nursing practice by allowing Nurse Aide F to administer a topical medication to Resident #28's wound. This failure could place residents at risk of inappropriate medication administration, infection and decline in health. Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 01/23/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included stroke, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty with speech, acute respiratory disease, Pneumonia (inflammatory condition of the lung), urinary tract infection, shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #28) reviewed for care consistent with professional standards, in that: The facility failed to clean Resident #28's CPAP (a machine used to keep breathing airway open) mask, nasal pillow and tubing daily. The facility failed to change Resident #28's CPAP tubing monthly. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infection, decline in health and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 01/23/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses included stroke, need for assistance with personal care, difficulty with speech, acute respiratory disease, Pneumonia (inflammatory condition of the lung), urinary tract infection, shortness of breath (difficulty breathing), COPD, hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body), obesity, diabetes, HTN and osteoarthritis (a type of joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-05-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility must dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 dumpsters reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility failed to ensure the dumpster door was secured on 1 of 2 dumpster bins during the initial kitchen tour on 05/05/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infections, pests and rodents from improperly disposed garbage. Findings included: Observation and interview on 05/05/2026 at 05:56 a.m., 1 of 2 outside trash bins was, opened. [NAME] A was observed closing the trash lid. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 05:56 a.m., [NAME] A stated that there were short CNAs who could not close the trash once it was opened. She could not provide the staff's names. She stated that the dumpsters were filled by all staff. She stated it was the kitchen's staff's responsibility to ensure it was closed. She stated it was important to keep the lid closed for infection control purposes. During an interview on 05/07/2026 at 09:12 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUADALUPE COUNTY HOSPITAL BOARD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| 106 N BARON PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GANN, KODY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2020 |
| 106 N BARON OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| BOSSE, DON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| NICHOLS, AMY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676164. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.