Avir At Carthage
701 S Market St, Carthage, TX 75633 · For profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (903) 693-6671 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (13% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jul 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $66,731 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-14)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.5% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 6.1–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 72.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision.The facility failed to supervise and put measures in place to keep Resident #1 from eloping on 6/13/25.The facility failed to complete Resident #1's quarterly elopement risk assessment due after 12/27/25. Resident #1's elopement risk assessment was not completed until 06/13/25, after she had eloped from the facility.The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/13/25 and ended on 06/17/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place the residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, undated, indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-16 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR to a resident requiring emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the residents advanced directives for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for emergency care ( Resident #1) The facility failed to assess and immediately initiate CPR when Resident #1, who was a full code, was found unresponsive in the dining room on 08/11/24 at 7:10 a.m. CPR was not initiated until EMS arrived (12 minutes after the resident was found unresponsive). Resident #1 was transported to the hospital, found to have large amounts of solid food in his airway, and pronounced deceased on [DATE] at 9:18 a.m. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/15/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:10 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/16/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent LVN A, on 12/10/23, from verbally and physically abusing Resident #1 when she used foul language and threw ice at Resident #1. The facility failed to prevent LVN A, on or about 12/10/23, from verbally and physically abusing Resident #2 when she used foul language and threw an object at Resident #2. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/10/2023 and ended on 12/15/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place resident at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/08/24, indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 02/21/24 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] B, DA C, and MA D immediately reported witnessed abuse towards Resident #1 to the abuse coordinator. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and Resident #2 was free from abuse per the policy. 3. The facility failed to ensure the abuse coordinator obtained in writing or electronic format witness statements from [NAME] B, DA C, and MA D. 4. The facility failed to ensure, per their policy, to report alleged allegation of abuse towards Resident #2 to HHSC. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/10/2023 and ended on 12/15/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk for physical harm, psychosocial harm, unsafe environment, and further abuse.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #160) reviewed for pressure injury. The facility failed to reposition Resident #160. The facility failed to have a low air loss mattress (is a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) on admission for Resident #160. The facility failed to follow up on nutritional labs (albumin (is protein in your blood plasma) and total protein (test measures the sum of all types of proteins in the blood. Proteins are fundamental to the functioning of the body)) results for Resident #160. The facility failed to ensure Resident #160 did not have a wound infection. These failures could place residents at risk for deterioration of wound and untreated wound infection. Findings included: Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and ensured the services that were to be furnished attained and maintained the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident#32) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for Resident #32 by monitoring his thyroid function with lab tests as ordered by the physician.This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services. Findings include:Record review of Resident #32's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in a safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the gas stove in the kitchen was in a safe operating condition when on 09/19/25 three of ten burners did not light when turned on and on 09/16/25 two of ten burners did not light. This failure could place the residents at risk of a fire and not receiving their meals in a timely manner.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 09/15/25 at 9:44 a.m., [NAME] E turned on the gas stove burners with 3 of 10 burners not lighting. The left front burner did not light but no gas was smelled. The back stove second burner to the left and far right did not light with no gas smell noted. She said she was responsible and had been educated to notify the DM and Maintenance Director if the stove burners did not light. She said the burners lit this morning. [NAME] E said the resident risk of a stove burner not lighting was a resident could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or others for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 had a call light within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of possible falls, major injuries, hospitalization, and unmet needs.Findings include: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 9/16/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #34 had diagnoses which included: paralytic syndrome (the loss of voluntary muscle movement), hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body), weakness, muscle wasting atrophy (wasting or thinning of your muscle mass), alternating exotropia (a type of eye misalignment where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessment to indicate Resident #40's wander alarm/ bracelet (wearable safety device that uses door sensors to send real time alerts to care givers when a resident with the bracelet leaves a designated area). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings include: Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 09/15/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a chronic complex mental health disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave) and autistic disorder (a complex developmental disability characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents #2) The facility failed to trim and clean under Resident #2's fingernails.This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 9/16/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes (high blood sugar), conduct disorders, lack of coordination, flaccid hemiplegia (unable to move) right dominant side, and cerebral infarction (stroke-disruption of blood flow to the brain causing tissue damage).Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision using a mechanical lift (assistive device) to prevent accidents for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was safely transferred using a mechanical lift with 2-person transfer on 9/16/2025 at 7:55 AM. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 9/16/2025 indicated he was [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Some of his diagnoses included chronic diastolic heart failure (a condition in which your heart's main pumping chamber (left ventricle) becomes stiff and does not relax properly between heartbeats), Cerebral infarction (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, leading to tissue damage), Flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (a condition characterized by flaccid paralysis on one side of the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #47)The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 received continuous oxygen as ordered by the physician when his oxygen tank was empty on 9/16/25. This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory complications. Findings included:Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 9/16/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Resident #47 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), weakness, and anxiety (mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, fear, nervousness).Record review of Resident #47's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a BIMS score of 8, which indicated he had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to securely store a white powder substance in a medication cup for Resident #14 located on bedside table. This failure could place residents at risk for access to medications/biologicals not approved for their health condition. Findings included:Record review of the face sheet dated 9/17/2025 indicated Resident #14 was [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (s a rare neurological condition that causes worsening (progressive) muscle weakness, numbness and other symptoms.), muscle weakness, ataxia (lack of coordination of voluntary muscle movements) and mild intermittent asthma (mild persistent asthma which causes airways to narrow and swell, making it difficult to breath). Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1of 3 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure CNA G and CNA M donned a gown when they performed peri care on Resident #3. Resident #3 was on enhancement barrier precautions. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 9/16/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included klebsiella pneumoniae (a type of bacteria normally found in human stool (feces) that can cause health-associated infections), personal history of other infectious and parasitic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily on 01/07/24, 01/13/24, 01/20/24, 1/21/24, 02/03/24, 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/24/24, 03/02/24, 03/03/24, 03/16/24, 03/17/24, 03/31/24, and 07/13/24. This failure had the potential to affect residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as an emergency care and disasters. Findings included: Record review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for Quarter 2 2024 (January 1-March 31) indicated the facility triggered for No RN Hours. The PBJ reported indicated, No RN Hours for 01/07, 01/13, 01/20, 01/21, 02/03, 02/04, 02/10, 02/24, 03/02, 03/03, 03/16, 03/17, and 03/31. Record review of the facility's January 2024 Staff Schedule provided on 08/18/24 indicated that the facility did not have an RN in the facility or did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 14 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident #8 and Resident #15) The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's falls on 05/29/24 and 07/07/24 were coded on her MDS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's falls on 05/09/24, 06/26/24, and 07/06/24 were coded on her MDS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's diagnosis of dementia (is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) was coded on her MDS. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was coded for receiving an anticoagulant (medicines that help prevent blood clots) not antiplatelet (medications that prevent platelets from sticking together and forming blood clots). These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 14 residents (Resident #15, Resident #23, and Resident #35) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #15's hearing problem and use of hearing aids. 2. The facility failed to care plan Resident #23's hearing problem, impaired vision, on antidepressant (is a type of medicine used to treat clinical depression) and oral antidiabetic (used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus to control glucose levels in the blood) medication, dental issue, and shortness of breath on exertion. 3. The facility failed to care plan Resident #35's impaired vision. These failures could place residents in the facility at an increased risk of a decline in physical or functional well-being, of not receiving necessary care or services, and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings included: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure ice machine was functioning properly and preventing ice from spilling out onto the floor. 2. The facility failed to ensure minimal black carbon buildup on iron gas stovetop and debris cleared from under burner. 3. The facility failed to ensure food was properly labeled, dated, and stored in a resident personal refrigerator. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for chemical contamination and food-borne illness. The findings were: During an observation on 8/18/2024 at 9:00 AM, the ice machine in the dining hall had a beige/brown blanket absorbing melting ice cubes laying directly in front of ice machine where residents and staff navigate. During an observation on 8/18/2024 at 10:44 AM, Resident #16 had a green, moldy undated, unlabeled sandwich stored in her mini…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #23) reviewed for incontinent care and 3 of 5 (Resident #5, Resident #18, and Resident #22) reviewed for Covid-19 infection control practices. 1.The facility failed to ensure MA A wore an N95 mask when entering Covid positive Resident #19 and #22's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA A changed her mask after leaving Covid positive Resident #19 and #22's room and entering another non-isolation room. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA P and Housekeeper Q wore proper PPE in Resident #5's room on 08/18/24 and 08/19/24. Resident #5 was COVID-19 positive. 4. The facility failed to ensure CNA P changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene appropriately while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #15) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and Resident #15's call light was placed within reach. This failure could place residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 08/18/24 indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old, female and admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant and flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side. Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 was usually understood and usually understood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete MDS discharge assessment was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #44) reviewed for discharge MDS assessments. The facility did not ensure Resident #44's discharge MDS assessment was completed and transmitted within 14 days of completion. This failure could place residents at risk of not having records completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 08/19/24, indicated Resident #44 was an 85-years-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (is a type of involving partial blockage of one of the coronary arteries, causing reduced flow of oxygen-rich blood to the heart muscle). Resident #44 was discharged home with services on 04/19/24. Record review of Resident #44's discharge assessment-return not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0642 — isolatedEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse signed and certified that the MDS assessment was completed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 44) reviewed for MDS completion. The facility failed to ensure the RN signed Resident #44's discharge MDS assessment as completed. This failure could place residents at risk for incomplete or inaccurate documentation that does not completely reflect the resident's status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 08/19/24, indicated Resident #44 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (is a type of involving partial blockage of one of the coronary arteries, causing reduced flow of oxygen-rich blood to the heart muscle). Resident #44 was discharged home with services on 04/19/24. Record review of Resident #44's discharge assessment-return not anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44's discharge date was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 (Resident #23) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 had daily blood sugar glucose checks due to being on an antidiabetic (help manage blood sugar (glucose) levels in people who have Type 2 diabetes) medication. This failure could place residents of risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment for hyperglycemia (when there's too much sugar (glucose) in your blood) or hypoglycemia (when your blood sugar (glucose) level falls too low for bodily functions to continue). Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 08/18/24 indicated Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes (is a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary and bowel incontinence (Resident #18 and #32). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 was not found excessively wet on 08/19/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed proper incontinent care by ensuring Resident #32 was completely clean after bowel movement and before placing a new brief on 8/19/2024. These failures placed residents who required assistance with incontinent care at risk for urinary tract infections, skin breakdown, and hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 08/18/24 indicated Resident #18 was a [AGE] year-old, female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 1 (CNA B) of 2 staff reviewed for demonstration of skills and techniques necessary for residents' needs. The facility failed to ensure CNA B identified and addressed a change in condition and failed to report to LVN L, when Resident #18's pink tinged urine visualized during incontinent care on 08/19/24 which delayed physician notification and treatment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their health and safety. Finding included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 08/18/24 indicated Resident #18 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant and urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including the accurate acquiring, administering, and receipt of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 1 of 14 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure MA A signed off on the Narcotic Drug Record for Resident #9's lacosamide (a medication used to reduce the number and severity of seizures) medication when the last dose on the medication card was administered. This failure could place residents who received medications at risk of missing medications or missing doses of medications and staff being unable to reconcile controlled substance counts. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 08/20/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included pseudobulbar affect (a neurological disorder that causes people to have sudden, uncontrollable, and inappropriate episodes of crying or laughing),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (a medication used in excessive doses and including duplicate therapy or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring, or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #35) The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 did not receive Minocycline, an antibiotic, without an indication of use and an excessive duration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 did not receive Acidophilus, a type of probiotic (good bacteria) found in the human gut, mouth, and vagina, and also in certain foods, for an excessive duration. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections (happens when germs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 14 residents (Resident # 23 and Resident #33) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to safely store wound cleanser in a locked compartment in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner for Resident #23 and Resident #33. This failure could place residents at risk for misuse of medication and overdose, adverse reactions of medications, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 08/18/24 indicated Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) of sacral region, stage 4, pressure ulcer and pressure ulcer of other site, stage 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report Resident #2's abuse allegation within 24 hours to the state agency. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to report the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Tussin DM (cough suppressant) bottle was properly safe and secured. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's [NAME] decongestant nasal spray (relieves sinus pressure and nasal congestion) was properly safe and secured. These failures could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet indicated an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included essential hypertension (high blood pressure), mild protein calorie malnutrition (type of malnutrition that results from not getting enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for Anonymous Residents #1-6 and 2 of 18 residents (Resident #33 and Resident #46) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to protect and value Anonymous Residents #1-6, Resident #33, and Resident #46's private spaces from Residents #39 and Resident #52, who frequently wandered into residents' rooms and went through their belongings. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, increased anxiety, and increased stress. Findings included: During a group meeting on 6/27/23 at 2:30 PM, Anonymous Residents #1-6 said Resident #39 and Resident #52 bothered them. Anonymous Residents #1-6 said Resident #39 and Resident #52 wandered the facility the entire day. Anonymous Residents #1-6 said Resident #39 and Resident #52 caused trouble everywhere they went. Anonymous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 4 of 7 (Resident #36, Resident #37, Resident #42, Resident #160) residents and 1 of 6 Halls (Hall 1) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident #37 could close her bedroom door. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 did not have brown and orange stains on the wall. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 did not have a torn vent cover behind the headboard. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42, and Resident #160 did not have torn walls of sheetrock. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #160 did not have brown and yellow stain on the wall. 6. The facility failed to ensure Resident #160 door was not obstructed by a footboard causing it not to completely close. 7. The facility failed to endure 4 foam ceiling tiles on Hall 1 were not bowing and brown stained. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsafe or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents or hazards for 2 of 7 residents that wandered reviewed for supervision. (Resident #39 and Resident #52) 1.The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to continue to prevent Resident #39 from entering Resident #15's room following a previous incident on 5/31/23 where Resident #39 had put his hands around Resident #15's neck. 2.The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #52 from exiting the building twice on 6/18/23. 3.The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #39 and Resident #52 from entering Resident #46's room and going through her things, resulting in Resident #46 being pushed by Resident #52. These failures could place residents at an increased risk of injury. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #39's face sheet dated 6/28/23 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services by sufficient numbers of other nursing personnel, which included but not limited to nurse aides, on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans for 5 of 17 residents (Residents #30, Resident #39, Resident #43, Resident #45, Resident #52) and Anonymous Resident Council members (AR 1-AR7) reviewed for care and services. The facility failed to provide sufficient staff on the 6a-2pm, 2pm-10pm, 10pm-6am (04/01/23-06/25/23) shifts to meet the needs of the residents who required assistance with activities of daily living. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, skin breakdown, low self-esteem, depression, embarrassment, and psychological harm. Findings included: Record review of the PBJ staffing Data Report dated 01/01/23-03/31/23 indicated the facility triggered for one star staff rating. Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool updated 04/24/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to provide RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily on 04/10/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/24/23, 06/25/23. The deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as an emergency care and disasters. Findings include: Record review of a nursing staff information sheet dated 04/10/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/24/23, 06/25/23 indicated that the facility did not have an RN in the facility or did not work 8 consecutive hours. During an interview on 06/29/23 at 10:50 a.m., the ADON C said she was currently the only RN scheduled due to the DON being on vacation. She said until the DON returned, she was solely responsible for RN coverage. She said the facility had two other RNs, but they no longer worked for the facility. The ADON C said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 6 of 18 residents and 7 anonymous residents reviewed for palatable food. (Anonymous Resident #1 - #7, Resident #22, Resident #25, Resident #35, Resident #38, Resident #50, and Resident #110) The facility failed to provide palatable food served to Resident #22, Resident #25, Resident #35, Resident #38, Resident #50, and Resident #110 who complained the food did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident Council Minutes dated 01/30/23 indicated .Res. (residents) would like more toss salad. Still too many of the same vegetables .Res. would like to have a meeting with the dietician . The response from the Dietary Manager indicated, We go by the menu. We a will tired get different veg. Next time dietician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-determination. (Resident #45) The facility did not assist Resident #45 out of bed when he requested. This failure could place dependent residents at risk for feelings of lack of self-determination and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 06/26/23 indicated Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, congestive heart failure (the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should.), cerebral infarction (stroke), nicotine dependence (is an addiction to tobacco products caused by the drug nicotine), and flaccid (loose or floppy) hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body) affecting right dominant side. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was understood and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident #18 was free from abuse, as a result Resident #18 was verbally abused by DA J. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, and/or emotional distress. The findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet, dated 6/28/23, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mental illness that affects thoughts, mood, and behavior with mania-extremely elevated & excitable mood, psychosis-thoughts and emotions that resident losses contact with reality, and depression-persistent sadness) and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). Record review of Resident #18's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/12/23, revealed he had clear speech and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #6 and Resident #34) The facility failed ensure Resident #6's MDS assessment was properly coded for PASRR and medication classification. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's MDS assessment was properly coded for having an indwelling catheter. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/26/23 indicated Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (is a common condition that causes the level of sugar (glucose) in the blood to become too high), psychotic disorder (is a mental health problem that causes people to perceive or interpret things differently to those around them) with hallucinations (is a false perception of objects or events involving your senses: sight, sound, smell,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #160). The facility failed to complete Resident #160's baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/26/23 indicated Resident #160 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4 (The wound penetrates all three layers of skin, exposing muscles, tendons, and bones in your musculoskeletal system), pain, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (is a disease in which your blood glucose, or blood sugar, levels are too high), nicotine dependence (is an addiction to tobacco products caused by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #13) The facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #13 by not weighing the resident weekly. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/27/23 revealed Resident #13 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, abnormal weight loss, and heart failure. Record review of physician's orders for Resident #13 dated 06/27/23 indicated an order for weekly weights for 30 days with a start date of 06/05/23 and an end date of 07/05/23. Record review of the most recent MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 was understood and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #43 and Resident #30). 1. The facility did not clean or trim Resident #43's fingernails. 2. The facility did not shave Resident # 30's facial hair. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. The findings were: 1. Record review of an electronic face sheet dated 06/27/23 revealed Resident #43 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), urinary tract infections (an infection in any part of the urinary system), Constipation (not passing stools regularly or you're unable to completely empty your bowel), Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #159) The facility failed to consistently document on Resident #159's dialysis communication form. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet date 06/26/23 indicated Resident #159 was [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis (is a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) and end stage renal disease (occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to work at a level needed for day-to-day life). Record review of the MDS revealed Resident #159 was admitted to the facility less than 21 days ago. No MDS for Resident #159 was completed prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 4 errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in an 15.38% percent medication error involving 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication pass. (Resident #45) The facility failed to administer scheduled medications in a timely manner for Resident #45. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration. The findings were: Record review of a face sheet dated 06/27/23 revealed Resident #45 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, high blood pressure, chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid, heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), and cerebral infarction (stroke). Record review of consolidated physician orders for Resident #45 dated 06/27/23 indicated an order with a start date of 02/28/22 for Eliquis (a blood thinner used in people with an irregular heartbeat to lower the risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #43, Resident #160) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA A kept Resident #160's indwelling catheter off the floor. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was provided water in a sanitary manner. These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/27/23 revealed Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), urinary tract infections (an infection in any part of the urinary system), Constipation (not passing stools regularly or you're unable to completely empty your bowel), Neuromuscular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$66,731 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $10,529 — penalty dated 2025-07-14
- $47,375 — penalty dated 2024-08-16
- $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-07-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 701 S MARKET ST HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| ANA TX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| GRAF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| TX SNF HOLDINGS III LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| TX SNF HOLDINGS MEMBER, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 10/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2025 |
| 701 S MARKET ST PROPERTY OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| AKPASSA, GERALD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| MILLER, BRANDI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $658K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455963. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.