No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir At Childress

1200 7th St NW, Childress, TX 79201 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (940) 937-8668 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (940) 937-8668 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2305 Avenue F Northwest, Suite 900
Pharmacy
805 Us Highway 83 N · (940) 937-9030 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1000 11th St NW · (940) 663-5844 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Fair Park Lake Childress Tx · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.162.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.942.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.2–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
65.6%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 43.1 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-14)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety.The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated.The facility failed to ensure dry goods and frozen items were not open to air.The facility failed to ensure lidded tubs and other containers for dry goods were clean and sanitized.These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness.Findings Included:An observation of the pantry on 02/12/26 at 06:51 AM revealed the following:A bag of macaroni noodles open to airA plastic storage container of cereal that had greyish marks on the outside that were grimy and sticky to touchA plastic, lidded, rectangular tub of a white flour-like substance with no label or date and a scoop lying on top of the flour-like substance.A plastic, lidded, rectangular tub of a rice-like substance with no label or dateA plastic, lidded, rectangular tub with no label or date that was grimy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to receive written or verbal notice of a room change before the change was made for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) received verbal or written notice prior to a room change. This failure could place residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason in order to accommodate other individuals.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record, dated 01/28/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease (paralysis), peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation) and major depressive disorder (mood disorder). Record review of Resident #2's annual MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 04 indicating severe cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. -The facility failed to accurately assess Resident #1 for oral/dental status on his annual MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could result in residents not receiving correct care and services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 01/28/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Guillain-Barre syndrome (a rare, serious, but usually temporary condition where your immune system mistakenly attacks your own nerves, often after a viral or bacterial infection), lack of coordination and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents observed for infection control practices. CNA B performed Resident #1's catheter care without placing a gown for EBP. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility originally on 3/03/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection with onset date of 9/17/2025, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland that causes urinary issues). Record review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed his last full MDS was a quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 51 days of the last 6 months. This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to being left without supervisory coverage for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters. Findings Included: Record review of the facility payroll-based journal for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025 revealed the facility did not have RN coverage on November 16, 17, and 30 and December 1, 14, 15, 28, and 29 of 2024. Record review of facility payroll revealed the facility did not have RN coverage for January 20; February 8, 9, 12, 13, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ,27, and 28; March 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23, 29, and 30; April 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 19, 26, and 27; May 3, 4, 10, and 11 of 2025. During an interview on 05/13/25 at 11:20 AM ADM provided the last quarter RN hours and stated he did not have any RN hours for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1of 1 kitchen when they failed to: A. Ensure general cleanliness was maintained. B. Ensure kitchen equipment was in good repair. These failures placed residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: In an observation on 5/12/25 at 10:32 am, of the kitchen revealed the plastic drawers holding utensils was grimy and sticky to the touch. There were food crumbs on the outside and inside of the drawers. The stainless-steel prep table shelves had crumbs and food debris on the lower shelves. The toaster had crumbs in the bottom of the toaster and was sticky to the touch. Observation of the door of the walk-in cooler revealed the door handle was black and sticky to the touch. The walk-in pantry had food crumbs and trash in the floor. In an observation on 5/12/25 at 10:35 am, the walk-in cooler thermometer read 45 degrees. The milk cartons and juice container were warm to the touch. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for all residents reviewed for activities. A. The activity calendar was not followed. B. There were no daily activities occurring on a regular basis in the facility. C. The activities did not meet the needs of the residents. D. Room visits were not conducted and did not meet the needs of the residents. The facility's failure to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being could potentially place all residents at risk of decreased self-worth, boredom, poor quality of life, depression, behaviors and decreased cognitive function. Findings include: During entrance to the facility on 5/12/25 at 10:25 am, seven residents in wheelchairs were sitting in the lobby. There were no activities ongoing in the facility. In a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an activities program directed by a qualified professional for 1 of 1 Activity Director reviewed for staff qualifications . The facility Activity Director was not a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings Include: During an interview on 5/13/25 at 3:15 pm, the AD stated she had not become a certified AD and had not started the classes to become certified. The AD stated she started the job as the AD on 9/12/24. The AD stated she had never been an AD before and had not had any experience in activities. The AD stated the facility would not pay for the classes up front and would reimburse her once she completed the classes. She stated she had not had the money to start the classes. She stated she hoped to start the classes in September. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #33) of 12 residents reviewed for pharmacy services and 1 of 1 treatment cart and 1 of 1 medication room. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not leave medications unattended with Resident #33. 2. The facility failed to ensure the medication room did not contain expired medications and expired IV tubing and the treatment cart did not contain expired medications. These failures could place residents at risk of harm due to not receiving needed medication, receiving expired medication; receiving medication at the wrong time or in the wrong dose; or receiving another resident's medication. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 05/13/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 2 of 2 carts (medication cart, treatment cart) reviewed for medication storage. The medication cart had undated insulin pen. The treatment cart had undated wound care supplies. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving expired medications. The findings included: On 05/13/25 at 09:15 AM, an observation of the medication cart was conducted with LVN C. One insulin pen was found in top drawer opened with no date. During an interview on 05/13/25 at 09:20 AM with LVN C, she stated all opened multiuse insulin pens should have the date they were opened. She stated she did not know why the pen was not dated. She stated she had been trained to dated insulin pens at the time they were opened. She stated the potential negative outcome was you do not know how long it's been in medication cart and could give expired insulin to resident. 05/13/25 at 10:00 AM, an observation of the treatment cart was conducted with LVN B. Two open bottles of wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to provide the right to personal privacy which includes accommodations during wound care for 1 of 12 (Resident #7) residents reviewed for Privacy. LVN B failed to close the door or the curtain during wound care for Resident #7. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained during medical treatment. Finding included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 05/14/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 05/01/25 with the following diagnoses: pneumonia (lung infection), right knee contracture, hypertension (high blood pressure), weakness and pain. Record review of Resident #7's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 6 which indicated resident cognition was severely impaired. During an observation of wound care on 05/13/25 at 01:23 PM LVN B failed to close the door or the curtains during wound care. Resident #7 was lying in bed with his feet exposed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 (Resident #33) of 12 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33's personal refrigerator was free of rotten and expired food and that his personal food was stored properly. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting food borne illness. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 05/13/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinsonism (conditions that affect the ability to move and live independently), need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified dementia (breakdown of thought process). Record review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS completed on 02/25/25 revealed the following: Section C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (Resident #44) of 12 residents reviewed for continence. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's catheter was changed timely. This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 05/12/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (long-term effects and complications occurring after a stroke) and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the nerves and muscles of the bladder do not work well resulting in the bladder not filling or emptying well). Record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS completed on 05/05/25 revealed the following: Section C Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 2 shower rooms (100 hall) reviewed for homelike environment. A. The facility failed to ensure the shower room on the 100 Hall did not have black grime buildup on the walls and floor of the shower room. B. The facility failed to ensure the shower room on the 100 Hall did not have a foul smell coming from the drain. These failures could place the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment due to unsanitary conditions. Findings included: During the confidential Resident Council meeting one resident stated there was black mold in the shower room and a putrid smell. She stated she felt the mold and the smell in the shower played a part in her not being able to breathe. She stated it was not good for her to breathe in the mold or the smell in the shower. She stated the mold had been in the shower for at least a month. During an observation and interview on 5/13/25 at 1:10 pm, with the DOR revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to confidentiality in his or her personal and medical records for one (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for privacy. Resident #1's medical information was shared with a surgeon via a nurse's personal email account. This failure could affect the residents residing in the facility by placing them at risk of losing their right to privacy and confidentiality. Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 02/19/2025 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to cellulites of left lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene(blockage of blood vessels affecting toes and feet), acquired absence of left left leg below the knee, contracture, right hip acquired absence of right leg below knee. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #1). LVN A did not inform facility Administration of a surgeon's recommendation for Resident #1 in a timely manner. The failure could place residents at risk for a delay of treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 02/19/2025 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to cellulitis of left lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene(blockage of blood vessels affecting toes and feet), acquired absence of left leg below the knee, contracture, right hip acquired absence of right leg below knee. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    FACILITY Kitchen Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 kitchen staff (Dietary Manager) reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to appoint a dietary manager with the appropriate license, certification, or qualifications. This failure could place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of not receiving services to meet their nutritional needs, contributing to food dissatisfaction, and placing residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: The initial tour of the kitchen on 4/7/24 at 9:52AM revealed two workers (Cook D and DA I) in the kitchen preparing food for the luncheon service. The Investigator asked DA I if they (the Investigator) could speak with the Dietary Manager and was told that currently, the facility did not have a Dietary Manager, and that facility staff had been preparing meals, since his dismissal on 4/1/24. Cook D and DA I stated they did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    FACILITY Kitchen Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. 3. The facility failed to store foods in accordance with professional standards. This failure could place residents at risk of acquiring a food-borne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: The initial tour of the kitchen on 4/7/24 at 9:52AM revealed no free-standing thermometers in the refrigerator, freezer, or dry panty. The temperatures being checked and logged were taken from the manufacture's thermometers on the outside of each appliance. There was no thermometer or logbook for the dry panty. Inspection of the refrigerator revealed: 2-4oz. boxes of thickened cranberry juice with no date, 4-4oz. glasses of tomato juice: open to air, with no date, 1-1-gallon pitcher of fruit juice: no label…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 6 (Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #18, Resident #35, Resident #36, and Resident #42) of 13 residents and for 1 (hall 600) of 6 halls reviewed for residents' rights. 1. The facility failed to keep the floor of Resident #5's room clean. 2. The facility failed to keep the floor and walls of Resident #35's room clean. 3. The facility failed to keep the floor of Resident #36's room clean. 4. The facility failed to keep the floor of Resident #42's room clean. 5. The facility failed to keep the bathroom of Resident #9 and Resident #18 clean. 6. The facility failed to keep the floor of hall 600 clean. These failures could lead to residents being harmed due to falls, feeling uncomfortable in their surroundings, or becoming sick due to spread of germs. Findings Included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN hours. The facility failed to have RN coverage for one day in October 2023, for two days in November 2023, and for four days in December 2023. This failure could negatively affect residents in the facility by leaving residents and staff without supervisory coverage for coordination of events such as emergency care and disasters. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for fiscal year quarter 1 2024 (October 1-December 31) revealed the facility triggered for no RN hours on 10/01/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23. During an interview on 04/08/24 at 08:41 AM DON stated there were no RN hours on 10/01/23, 11/18/23, 11/19/23, 12/02/23, 12/03/23, 12/16/23, and 12/17/23. She stated she had been employed by the facility for 2 months in October of 2023 and the other RN who worked for the facility went on maternity leave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received, and the facility provided three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community, as well as suitable, nourishing alternative meals and snacks for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal service times, consistent with the resident's plan of care. The facility failed to ensure all residents in the facility, received food trays at times comparable with normal mealtimes in the community. The facility failed to provide all residents who wanted snacks, at regular intervals between the three daily meals. These failures could place residents at risk of diminished nutritional status, food dissatisfaction and diminished physical well-being. Findings included: On 4/7/24 at 11:32PM 6 residents were observed sitting in the dining room, waiting for lunch service. On 4/7/24 at 12:00PM an observation of the dining room revealed the posted luncheon mealtime was 12:00PM and there were 27 residents sitting in the dining room, waiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident's property for two (Cook C and DA E) of 14 employees reviewed for criminal history background checks prior to or at hire. The facility failed to implement their policy and complete a criminal history background check on [NAME] C and DA E prior to hire. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of their property by staff members. Findings Included: Record review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and dated 10/2023 revealed the following: . The facility will provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Screening A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #97) of 13 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to address Resident #97's oxygen therapy in her baseline care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving correct and/or necessary care/treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, disease of biliary tract (disease of the network of organs and vessels that make, store and transfer bile through the body), peritonitis (inflammation of the membrane that lines the inner abdominal wall and encloses organs within the abdomen), and wheezing (shrill whistle or coarse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #97) of 13 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #97 had physician's orders for oxygen before administering oxygen. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving oxygen at the wrong rate which could lead to hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood), pulmonary oxygen toxicity (damage to the lung lining tissues and air sacs), hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood, decreasing the oxygen supply to vital organs), and shortness of breath. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 CNAs (CNA B and CNA C) reviewed for infection control. CNA B and CNA C failed to don appropriate PPE when delivering meals to Covid positive residents. This failure could place well residents who took meals in their rooms, at risk of sickness due to the transmission of Covid-19 which could lead to a reduction in resident's quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: An interview with LVN A on 11/13/23 at 12:02PM revealed the Dietary Manager was at home with Covid-19. She stated there were currently 10 residents who had Covid-19. They were sequestered to their rooms with droplet precaution signs on the doors and bins with full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) outside of the rooms for nursing staff use. She stated all staff should don full PPE before entering a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to inform the resident's physician and resident's representative when there was an accident or incident which resulted in injury or had the potential for physician intervention for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for Change in Status. The facility failed to inform Resident #1 physician after Resident #1 was involved in an altercation. The facility failed to inform Resident #2's physician and responsible party after Resident #2 was involved in an altercation and three additional falls, one of which resulted in injury. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving essential physician care and resident representatives not being notified of change in status, which could affect the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission records revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, at the time of admission, have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for admission orders. Resident #3's clinical record did not contain physician orders for care of Resident #3's surgical incision. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving essential care consistent with the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being upon admission to the facility. Findings included: An interview and observation with Resident #3 on 11/13/23 at 3:14PM revealed that she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a surgical site to the bottom of her left foot, resulting from surgical debridement of a diabetic foot ulcer. She stated the dressing to the bottom of her foot had only been changed once since her admission. The date observed on the dressing was noted as 11/11/23. Resident #3 thought the dressing was to be changed daily. Record Review of Resident #3's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, except when waived, use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The facility failed to have an RN working at the facility for 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week, during the months of December 2022, January 2023 and half of February 2023. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of staff being without supervisory support for the coordination of events such as emergency care, disasters, and resident emergencies. LVN and CNA staff are required to have RN supervision at all times. Findings include: Record review of the facility provided time sheets for registered nurses for the last 90 days revealed the following: The facility did not have an RN working in the facility on December 26 and 27, 2022; January 2023 on 1, 6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 23, 24 and 27, and February 2023 on1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 15. During an Interview on 02/15/2023, at 2:43 PM, the ADM indicated he was aware the facility had not had RN coverage for several days during the months of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and appetizing for residents who consumed foods orally from 1 of 1 lunch meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 1 of 1 lunch meal observed on 2/16/2023. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. Findings include: During an interview on 02/15/2023 at 11:20 AM Resident # 15 stated the food was bad. During an interview on 02/15/2023 at 11:25 AM Resident # 42 stated the food was bad. During an interview on 02/15/2023 at 02:48 PM Resident # 35 stated the food here is awful. Resident stated even the alternative food is bad most of the time. During an interview on 02/15/2023 at 03:00 PM Resident # 22 stated the food was so, so. During confidential interviews on 02/16/2023 at 10:05 AM, four residents, stated food sometimes is good at other times is not good. Observation of the test tray on 02/16/2023 at 12:40 PM revealed the food tray consisted of a bowl of beans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to make sure expired foods were disposed and open food items labeled. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of causing food-born illness, weight loss, and a diminished meal experience. Findings include: In an observation on 02/15/2023 at 10:05 AM on initial kitchen rounds revealed the following: 1. The Walk-in cooler had a plastic container, which contained sweet potatoes with an open date of 2/8/2023 use by date of 2/11/2023. 2. The Walk-in cooler had a plastic container, which contained spiced apples with prep date of 12/2/2022 and use by date of 12/10/2022. 3. The dry storage area had a plastic bag which contained four open bags of bread with no open date or use by date listed on any of the bags of bread. Each of the bags of bread contained approximately four to five pieces of bread. On 02/16/2023 at 08:25 AM, a follow-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four out of twelve staff members (ADON, LVN A, CNA B and OTA) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A doffed gloves and performed hand hygiene appropriately during wound care. 2. The facility failed to ensure OTA, ADON and CNA B performed hand hygiene appropriately during lunch with residents requiring feeding assistance. These failures could place residents at risk for transmissible diseases or slow wound healing due to cross contamination. Findings include: 1. During dining observation on 02/15/23 at 12:30 PM, OTA (Occupational Therapy Assistant) was observed walking around the dining room when Resident #41 dropped his fork. OTA retrieved a new fork for Resident #41, touching him on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/30/2014
HOLCOMB, HOLLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/29/2021
1200 7TH ST NW OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2026
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2026
1200 7TH ST NW PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
DARTER, THOMASIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2014
SUE, JOSHUAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2024

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 6%Other / private 25%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$214per resident / day
operating cost
$6,497per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$244per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next