Avir at Comfort
615 Faltin St., Comfort, TX 78013 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (830) 995-3757 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.1% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 32.9–63.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 8.5–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 70.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 10.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 32.4 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 32% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's psychosocial needs for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #1, 2, and 3) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The facility failed to ensure residents' preferences for activities and leisure were addressed in the comprehensive care plans for Residents #1, 2, and 3. This failure could result in decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by severe mood swings). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS submitted 3/5/2026 reflected a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #1's Activities- Quarterly/Annual Participation Review dated 10/14/2025 reflected the following: .2. Describe resident's favorite activities, special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #-3) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure residents #1, #2, and #3 had the option of participating in daily, organized activities to meet the residents' psychosocial needs and preferences during May 2026. This failure could result in decreased psychosocial well-being or decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of the activities calendar dated May 2026 reflected SELF-DIRECTED ACTIVITIES [sic] listed on every Saturday and Sunday of the month, totaling 10 days. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered professional nurse at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facilities reviewed for nursing services. The facility did not utilize the services of an RN on 2/22/25, 2/23/25, 3/1/25, 3/30/25, 4/13/25, 4/20/25, 4/27/25, 5/4/25, 6/1/25, 6/8/25, 6/15/25, 6/29/25, 7/6/25, 7/13/25, 7/20/25, 7/27/25, 8/3/25, 8/10/25, and 8/17/25 for a total of 19 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services.The findings were: Review of the PBJ staffing data report for FY quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31) with a run date of 8/14/25 revealed the facility triggered for no RN hours for Saturday 2/22/25, Sunday 2/23/25, Saturday 3/1/25, and Sunday 3/30/25. Review of the facility time sheets for RNs revealed the facility had no RN coverage for Saturday 3/1/25. Review of the facility time sheets for RNs revealed the facility had no RN coverage for Sundays on 3/30/25, 4/13/25, 4/20/25, 4/27/25, 5/4/25, 6/1/25, 6/8/25, 6/15/25, 6/29/25, 7/6/25, 7/13/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for quality of care. CNA A transferred Resident #3 using a mechanical lift without the assistance of another staff member. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents, injury, and pain. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 8/22/25 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy (an acute, life-threatening neurological emergency caused by a severe thiamine (Vitamin B1) deficiency, most often due to chronic alcohol abuse but also associated with poor nutrition or malabsorption. Its classic symptoms include loss of muscle coordination), generalized muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy not elsewhere classified unspecified site (wasting or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide nursing care with a sufficient number of nursing personnel on a 24-hour basis to all residents in accordance with resident care plans for 1 out of 4 days (04/07/25) reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. The facility failed to have sufficient staff available to provide resident care for approximately 5 hours during the 2P-10P shift on 04/07/25. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving necessary care to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, accessed 04/18/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), unsteadiness of feet, and generalized muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/05/25, reflected Resident #2 was partial/moderate assistance (Helper does LESS THAN HALF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed, in that: Resident #1's Care Plan still reflected resident was a 1 person transfer when she was a 2-person transfer. The deficient practices could affect any resident and could result in the inaccuracy of assessments and contribute to residents not receiving care for identified care needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, accessed [DATE], reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] and expired [DATE], with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and partial weakness of one side), cerebral infarction (necrotic tissue in the brain), and dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was substantial/maximal assistance (helper does MORE THAN HALF the effort)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 20 days (1/1/24, 1/6/24, 1/13/24, 1/14/24, 1/20/24, 1/27/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/10/24, 2/17/24, 4/6/24, 4/21/24, 5/11/24, 5/12/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/8/24, 6/9/24, 6/15/24, and 6/16/24), reviewed for nursing services. The facility had no RN coverage for 1/1/24, 1/6/24, 1/13/24, 1/14/24, 1/20/24, 1/27/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/10/24, 2/17/24, 4/6/24, 4/21/24, 5/11/24, 5/12/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/8/24, 6/9/24, 6/15/24, and 6/16/24. (20 days from January 2024 to June 2024) This failure could result in residents not receiving the required services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of the CMS PBJ staffing data report run date 7/3/24 for quarter 2 (January 1 through March 31st) revealed the facility triggered for no RN hours on 1/1/24, 1/6/24, 1/13/24, 1/14/24, 1/20/24, 1/27/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/10/24, and 2/17/24. Record review of the facility timesheets revealed no RN coverage for 1/1/24 (Monday), 1/6/24 (Saturday),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #13) who were observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #13. This deficient practice could affect any resident and keep them from calling for help as needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 07/10/2024, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: other specified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with anxiety, unspecified macular degeneration, shortness of breath, and localized edema. Record review of Resident #13's admission MDS assessment, dated 06/29/2024, revealed the resident's BIMS score was 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints to cover hair when in the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure staff with facial hair was covered by a hair restraint. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 07/07/2024 at 9:13 a.m. during initial tour of the kitchen revealed CNA A entered the kitchen and washed hands at the sink without a hair net. During an interview on 07/07/24 at 9:23 a.m. CNA A revealed she should have had a hair net on due to contamination. CNA A further stated she had just come in from taking some trash and had something on her hand and was trying to find the nearest sink to wash her hands. CNA A stated a hair net should be always worn when you are in the kitchen or entering the kitchen due to contamination risk. Observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a Baseline Care Plan for resident 1 of 3 (Resident #6) who was admitted on hospice to the facility for respite care on 8/31/2023. The facility failed to initiate a Baseline Care Clan within 48 hours of admission date on 8/31/2023 to include information for the resident's stay for respite, for her hospice care, and for her stage 2 left heel wound while at the facility. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving person-centered care that is needed for communicating with staff to ensure the resident's needs are met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet on 2/28/2024 at 3:25PM revealed she was an [AGE] year old woman admitted to facility 8/31/2023 with diagnoses which include: Parkinson's disease, hypotension (low blood pressure), and Rhabdomyolosis (breakdown of muscle that release a damaging protein- myoglobin into the blood that can cause kidney damage). Record review of Resident #6's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to post a sign on Resident #10's door to indicate she was on Contact Isolation (any of the techniques used in addition to standard precautions that decrease the likelihood of infection by microorganisms transmitted through direct or indirect contact with the patient or patient care items, e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). This deficient practice could affect staff, residents, and visitors who may enter Resident #10's room without the appropriate PPE and expose them to infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #10's electronic face sheet (undated) reflected she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the facility fryer was clean and old oil discarded. 2. The facility failed to ensure homemade Jell-O was discarded after 3 days. These deficient practices could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings were: 1. In an observation on 6/4/2023 at 9:45 a.m. of the facility fryer located in the facility kitchen revealed there were two separate wells with oil. Further inside the oil wells revealed the well on the right was dark and was unable to see the bottom of the pan. Further review of the kitchen fryer revealed there was a thick splatter of oil on the outside of the fryer and on the table the fryer was sitting on. In an interview on 6/4/2023 at 9:52 a.m. with the FSS revealed they used only the fryer on the left and used the right side for run off from the fried food item. The FSS reported he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months, and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 4 (Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G) of 6 staff, in that; The facility failed to provide an annual performance review and subsequent trainings based on the outcome of the review for 4 (Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G) of 6 nurse aides reviewed for competencies. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: Lead CNA K, CNA F, CNA G. The total number of CEUs did not total 12 hours per year on the required annual training topics for any staff. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: CNA E. Review of CNA Lead K's personnel record had a hire date of 10/03/2013, with annual training in-services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 19 of 31 facility staff reviewed for trainings consistent with their expected roles, in that; The facility failed to provide the ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O with trainings consistent with their expected roles. Findings included: Review of the undated excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: ADM, PT, OT L, OT M, Lead CNA K, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O. The total number of CEUs did not total 12 hours per year on the required annual training topics for any staff. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: DON, SW, CNA H, RN P, LVN B or CNA E. Review of ADM's personnel record had a hire date of 9/10/2021, with annual training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include effective communications as mandatory training for 17(DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O) of 31 direct care staff reviewed for trainings, in that; The facility failed to provide the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O with effective communications as mandatory training. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: PT, OT L, OT M, Lead CNA K, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O. The total number of CEUs did not total 12 hours per year on the required annual training topics for any staff. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: DON, SW, CNA H, RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff members are educated on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents 19 (ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O) of 31 facility staff reviewed for education records, in that;:: The facility failed to provide the ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O with education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the undated excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: ADM, PT, OT L, OT M, Lead CNA K, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, ACT DIR, LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff members are educated on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and activities that constitute such actions, procedures for reporting incidents, and dementia management and resident abuse prevention, for 19 (ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O) of 31 facility staff reviewed for education, in that; The facility failed to provide the ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O with training that education on abuse, neglect, and exploitation and activities that constitute such actions, procedures for reporting allegations, and dementia management and resident abuse prevention. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to include as part of its infection prevention and control program mandatory training that includes the written standards, policies, and procedures for the program for 19 of 31 facility staff reviewed for trainings on infection control, in that; The facility failed to provide the ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O with trainings on infection control. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the undated excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: ADM, PT, OT L, OT M, Lead CNA K, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O. The total number of CEUs did not total 12 hours per year on the required annual training topics for any staff. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: DON, SW, CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to communicate the compliance and ethics program's standards, policies and procedures through a training program or other practical manner which explains the requirements for 19 of 31 facility staff reviewed for education, in that; The facility failed to communicate the compliance and ethics program's standards to the ADM, the DON, the SW, the PT, OT L, OT M, CNA H, RN P, LVN B, Lead CNA K, CNA E, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, the ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs, received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: ADM, PT, OT L, OT M, Lead CNA K, DA Q, CNA F, CNA G, ACT DIR, LVN D, RN N, LVN C, and LVN O. The total number of CEUs did not total 12 hours per year on the required annual training topics for any staff. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: DON, SW, CNA H, RN P, LVN B or CNA E. Review of ADM's personnel record had a hire date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide in-service training that was sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year and included dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training, and care of the cognitively impaired for 5 (CNA H, Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G) of 5 CNAs reviewed for annual training, in that; The facility failed to provide CNA H, Lead CNA K, CNA E, CNA F, and CNA G with 12 hours per year of annual training that included dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training, and care of the cognitively impaired. This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff. Findings included: Review of the undated excel spread sheet, entitled CEUs [Continuing Education Units], received 6/06/2023 at 6:41 PM from the ADM, revealed inclusion of the following staff: Lead CNA K, CNA F, CNA G. Spread sheet did not include the follow staff: CNA H, or CNA E. The total…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place to assure assessments are conducted in accordance with the specified timeframes for each resident for 3 of 22 residents (#11, #25, #26) reviewed for MDS timeliness, in that; 1. Resident #11 discharged from the facility on 1/13/2023 however the resident's discharge MDS Assessment was not completed until 5/31/2023. 2. Resident #25 was discharged from the facility on 2/18/2023 however the resident's discharge MDS Assessment was not completed until 6/8/2028. 3. Resident #26 was discharged from the facility on 2/18/2023 however there was not a discharge MDS completed. These failures could result in incorrect billing to the residents' insurance and could prevent additional services the residents could receive in the community. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an assessment was completed for residents within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's status for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for MDS assessments, in that: The facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS for Resident #7 within 14 days after the resident was discharged from hospice services. This deficient practice could place residents discharged from hospice services at-risk of not having their individual needs met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 6/6/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], most recent admission date of 2/6/2015 and had diagnoses that included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, Wernicke's encephalopathy (a degenerative brain disorder caused by lack of vitamin B1), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each Minimum Data Set (MDS) was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 22 (Resident #25) residents reviewed for MDS transmittal in that: Resident #25's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not submitted as of 6/7/2023. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their assessments transmitted timely. The findings were: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 2/18/2023. The resident's diagnoses listed on the face sheet included hypertensive heart disease (a long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure), spinal stenosis (when spaces in the spine narrow and create pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots), generalized muscle weakness, and age-related physical disability.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #8) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility identified Resident #8 had two stage 3 pressure ulcers on the resident's MDS Assessment however the resident did not have any stage 3 pressure wounds. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 6/6/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included dementia, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid diagnose through blood tests), heart disease with heart failure, pressure wounds of right buttock stage 1 (affects the upper layer of the skin which appears reddened with no open wound), and two stage 3 pressure wounds (open wounds that have burrowed past the skins second layer and reached the fat layers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0642 — isolatedEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse signed and certified that the MDS assessment was completed for 1 of 22 residents (Resident # 25) reviewed for MDS completion, in that; The facility failed to ensure the RN signed Resident #25's discharge MDS assessment as completed. This failure could place residents at risk for incomplete or inaccurate documentation that does not completely reflect the resident's current status. The findings included: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 2/18/2023. The resident's diagnoses listed on the face sheet included hypertensive heart disease (a long-term condition that develops over many years in people who have high blood pressure), spinal stenosis (when spaces in the spine narrow and create pressure on the spinal cord and nerve roots), generalized muscle weakness, and age-related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for care plans, in that; The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours for Resident #8 after the resident was admitted to the facility. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving care and services as needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 6/6/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included dementia, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid diagnose through blood tests), heart disease with heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (mild to moderate damage to the kidneys which are less able to filter waste and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's mental, nursing, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, for 1 of 22 Residents (Resident #8) reviewed for care plans, in that: 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that was specific for Resident #8 to address hospice information, details of hospice care provided and coordination of services. This failure could place residents at risk for not getting their medical, physical, and psychosocial needs met and not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 6/6/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for urinary catheters, in that: Resident #23 had an indwelling urinary catheter for 5 days without a physician's order or related care orders to be provided. This deficient practice could affect residents who had urinary catheters at risk of not receiving care needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admit date of 4/24/2023, a readmit date of 5/29/2023, and had diagnoses that included heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body either does not produce enough insulin or it resists insulin) with diabetic polyneuropathy (progressive death of nerve fibers), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis. The face sheet also noted the resident was on hospice services. Review of Resident #23's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for registered nursing coverage, in that; A registered nurse [RN] was not present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week on 4 occasions (4/01/2023, 4/08/2023, 4/15/2023, and 5/14/2023) in the 3 months (3/01/2023 - 6/04/2023) prior to the survey period. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for coordination of events such as assessments, interventions, care and treatment requiring the advanced education, skills and judgement of an RN. The findings were: Review of PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, with a run date of 5/30/2023 revealed inadequate RN coverage, less than 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week, for over approximately 2 months, between 10/03/2022 through 12/10/2022. Review of sign in sheets for the previous 3 months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine drugs and biologicals to its residents, or obtain them for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #31) observed for pharmacy services, in that; The facility failed to obtain gabapentin medication as required for Resident #31. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of the admission face sheet, dated 6/08/2023, revealed Resident #31 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/29/2023, revealed Resident #31 was admitted for non-traumatic brain dysfunction as the primary reason for admission. Other active diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis [degenerative disease resulting in scarring and functional failure] of the liver with ascites [abnormal buildup of fluid in the belly, prognosis is poor]. Resident #31 had a summary BIMS score of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #31) observed during medication administration, in that; The facility failed to administer medications (gabapentin, a medication to relieve nerve pain) as prescribed for Resident #31. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of the admission face sheet, dated 6/08/2023, revealed Resident #31 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/29/2023, revealed Resident #31 was admitted for non-traumatic brain dysfunction as the primary reason for admission. Other active diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis [degenerative disease resulting in scarring and functional failure] of the liver with ascites [abnormal buildup of fluid in the belly, prognosis is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys in 1 of 3 medication carts (Treatment Cart) reviewed for medication storage, in that; The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Cart was locked when it was left unattended at the Nurses' Station in a common area. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. The findings were: In an observation on 6/07/2023 at 12:50 PM, the Treatment Cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended at the Nurses Station. This was a common pass-through area to common areas of the smoking patio, break room, television room and exit. There were ambulatory and self-mobilizing residents, visitors, and staff in the immediate vicinity. In an observation and interview on 6/07/2023 at 12:53 PM, the RVP stated the cart should be locked when not attended. The Treatment Cart contained prescription and over-the-counter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: Resident #23's electronic medical record did not have a diagnosis for her indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for harm due to inaccurate records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admit date of 4/24/2023, a readmit date of 5/29/2023, and had diagnoses that included heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body either does not produce enough insulin or it resists insulin) with diabetic polyneuropathy (progressive death of nerve fibers), chronic pain, and osteoarthritis. The face sheet also noted the resident was on hospice services. Review of Resident #23's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to obtain Resident #2's copy of the hospice Plan of Care and a signed copy of the Hospice Election Form. This failure could place the residents who received hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6/7/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia (a term describing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-10 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility for 2 of 4 days (7/7/24 and 7/8/24), observed for postings. The facility did not have the survey results available and accessible to residents and visitors without having to ask for them on 7/7/24 and 7/8/24 during the survey period. This failure resulted in residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents being unable to access prior survey results without having to ask to see them. The findings were: During an observation on 7/7/24 at 8:50 a.m. there was a picture framed, and carved sign on the wall in the entrance of the facility and read the annual survey results were in the lobby for viewing. No survey results were observed in the lobby, common area, or on the nurses station desk. During an observation and interview on 7/7/24 at 12:30 p.m. No survey results were observed in the lobby, common area, or on the nurses station desk. The HRC stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-10 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift for 4 of 8 days (7/4/24, 7/5/24, 7/6/24, and 7/7/24) prior to and during the survey period, reviewed for nursing services. The daily staff posting was not posted on 7/4/24, 7/5/24, 7/6/24, and 7/7/24. (4 days) This failure could result in residents and visitors being unaware of facility staffing levels. The findings were: During an observation on 7/7/24 at 8:53 a.m. 07/07/24 the daily staffing was posted on wall to left of nursing station in a clear plastic holder and was dated 7/3/24, the sheet behind that was dated 7/4/24. There were no other daily staffing sheets observed. During an observation on 7/7/24 at 10:50 a.m. the daily staffing was posted on wall to left of nursing station in a clear plastic holder and was dated 7/3/24, the sheet behind that was dated 7/4/24 and had not been updated. In an interview on 7/7/24 at 8:58 a.m. LVN B stated she was not sure who was responsible for posting the daily staffing but thought it was the DON and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.3 | +2.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 1.8 | +2.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/10/2021 |
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| 615 FALTIN ST OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2026 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| 615 FALTIN ST PROPERTY OWNER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| FOLEY, HEATHER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2023 |
| GIVENS, LAURA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675871. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.