No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Commerce

2901 Sterling Hart Dr, Commerce, TX 75428 · Government - Federal · 116 certified beds · (903) 886-2510 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 886-2510 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1504 Lee Street, Henderson Hall, Commerce, TX 75428 · (903) 886-5853 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1603 Culver Street · (903) 886-2867 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1603 Culver St · (903) 886-3252 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Commerce Ball Fields · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.6%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication6.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.672.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.032.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.77U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.43hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.77 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.6%CMS range 22.8–52.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.0–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 4.5–15.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.151.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
69.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 40.5 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 76 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for care plan.The facility failed to implement the intervention to keep glasses clean for Residents #1 and Resident #3. The facility to develop a care plan with interventions for Resident #2's eyeglasses to ensure they stay clean. This failure could place residents at risk of falls and decrease quality of life. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/28/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), malnutrition (a deficiency or imbalance of nutrients that affect the body's health and development), lumbar radiculopathy (a condition in which a nerve root in the lower back becomes compressed or irritated causing pain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hyperlipidemia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis or have a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services.The facility did not have 8 hours of RN coverage for 17 of 121 days (10/10/25, 10/11/25, 10/12/25, 10/16/25, 10/17/25, 10/18/25, 10/19/25, 11/15/25, 12/01/25, 12/14/25, 12/21/25, 12/25/25, 01/18/26, 01/24/26, 01/27/26, 01/28/26 and 02/06/26).The facility did not have a designated DON to work full time of at least 40 hours a week from 01/20/26 till current (02/12/26).This deficient practice could place 49 residents at risk of not receiving adequate care by not having staff available with the ability to perform assessments as needed. Findings included: Record review of the facility RN timesheets revealed there were no RN hours for 10/10/25 10/11/25, 10/12/25, 10/16/25, 10/17/25, 10/18/25, 10/19/25, 11/15/25, 12/1/25, 12/14/25, 12/21/25, 12/25/25, and 1/24/26. Record review of the facility RN timesheets revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #17, #12, and #16) reviewed for PASRR. 1. The facility failed to provide documentation of Residents #17 and #16's habilitation coordination as requested in the PCSP Form. 2. The facility failed to provide documentation of Resident #12's independent living skills services as requested in the PCSP Form.These failures could cause residents with mental health disorders and psychiatric conditions to have a delay in services or not receive specialized services or equipment that may be needed.Findings included: Resident #17 1. Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (lifelong neurological disorders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23 and Resident #35) reviewed for food safety. 1.The facility failed to ensure they had pasteurized eggs in the refrigerator. 2.The facility failed to ensure the Maintenance Supervisor wore a hairnet and beard guard while in the kitchen on 02-09-26. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included:1. During observations with Dietary Manager on 02/09/25 beginning at 9:39 am, the following observation was made in the kitchen Refrigerator (1 of 2): 1 box of 80 unpasteurized eggs.During an observation and interview on 02/10/26 at 10:00 a.m., the Dietary Manager said she did not know the eggs were unpasteurized until state surveyor intervention. The Dietary Manager said two residents received fried eggs, Resident #23 and Resident #35. She said sometimes their eggs would be soft fried (characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish policies regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 smoking area reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to provide a metal container with a self-closing cover device. 2. The facility did not ensure smoked cigarettes were extinguished in a fire-retardant receptacle. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe smoking and injury.Findings Included:During an observation on 02/10/26 at 6:01 p.m., a group smoke break of five residents smoking revealed cigarette butts on the ground outside in the smoking area, trash in the red noncombustible cigarette butt receptacle can, and the self-closing ashtray was malfunctioning. During the observation cigarettes were put on top of the self-closing ashtray with other old cigarette butts. During an interview on 02/10/26 at 6:15 PM, the Director of Dietary Services stated she was responsible for the 6:00 p.m. smoke break. The Director of Dietary Services stated there should not be trash in the red receptacle where cigarette…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 18 (Resident #40) residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #40 was provided with his scheduled bath/showers. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's fingernails were trimmed and free from a black colored substance routinely. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.Findings included:Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery (when a blood clot forms in one part of the body and then travels through the blood to the brain, where it blocks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents hazards.The facility did not ensure acetone was not stored on Resident #3's dresser on 02/10/26. This failure could place residents at risk for injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic systolic heart failure (occurred when the left ventricle weakens and cannot pump blood effectively, causing blood to back up in the body). Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/18/26, reflected Resident #3 made herself understood and understood others. Resident #3's BIMS score was 15, which reflected her cognition was intact. Resident #3 required set-up or clean up assistance with personal hygiene. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #23) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's foley catheter (tube inserted into bladder) was secured on 02/10/26, 02/11/26, and 02/12/26. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack bladder control due to brain, spinal cord or nerve problems). Record review of Resident #23's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected Resident #23 made herself understood and understood others. Resident #23 had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goal and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to have Resident #40's oxygen sign outside the door on 02/09/26, 02/10/26, 02/11/26, and 02/12/26. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections including pneumonia, shortness of breath and even death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Asthma (condition that causes airways to swell, narrow and fill with mucus), and wheezing (whistling sound made when air flows through narrowed airways in the lungs). Record review of Resident #40's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that accommodated the residents' preferences for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for preferences. The facility did not honor Resident #16's preference for no lima beans on 02/09/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a decrease in residents' choices and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, indicated a 54 -year-old female, admitted [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes, high blood pressure, and cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture). Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/26/26, indicated Resident #16 understood and was understood by others. Her BIMS score was 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated she was independent in eating and oral hygiene. Record review of Resident #16 's physician orders, dated 11/05/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not ensure Resident #14's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 02/12/26, reflected Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Alzheimer's (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA H followed EBP and put on gown and gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #6 on 02/11/26. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings Included:Record review of face sheet, dated 02/11/26, indicated Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset (progressive memory loss and cognitive decline), benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (enlargement of the prostate gland) and chronic kidney disease stage 3A (moderate kidney damage and moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 12 resident rooms (Resident #16) reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's windowsill was in good repair without exposed and splintered wood. This failure could place residents at risk for further deterioration, uncomfortable temperatures, the inability to properly clean, and possible pest infestation.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 02/10/2026, at 5:30 p.m., Resident #16's room windowsill had a visible hole and separated wood along the lower interior portion beneath the window. The opening measured approximately 10-12 inches in length and approximately 1-2 inches in width. The area contained cracked, splintered, and deteriorated wood with exposed inner material. The damaged section of the windowsill was located at resident height and was accessible to the resident. The surface was not smooth, intact, or cleanable. The windowsill had no protective covering, or repair was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient number of nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for care and services. The facility failed to provide sufficient CNAs according to the facility assessment on 02/01/2025, 02/04/2025, 02/05/2025, 02/06/2025, 02/07/2025, 02/08/2025, 03/01/2025, 03/07/2025, 03/10/2025, 03/12/2025, 03/25/2025, 03/29/2025, 04/01/2025. This failure placed residents at risk of inadequate supervision, an unsafe environment, falls, serious harm and injury, exacerbations of disease processes, abuse, and death. Findings included: During an interview Anonymous Staff Member #1 said they had been working short staffed for a while, but it was getting better. Anonymous Staff Member #1 said there were multiple nights where there was one CNA for the whole building. Anonymous Staff Member #1 said they worked as a team to care for the residents. Anonymous Staff Member #1 said they provided care to the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated respectfully when CNA B spoke to Resident #1 in a loud manner and patted her hand on 04/14/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment, feelings of worthlessness, decreased self-worth, loss of dignity, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/08/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinsonism (condition that impacts movement and causes muscle stiffness, slow movement, speech impairment, tremors, slowed reaction time, frequent falls), anxiety disorder (mental illness defined by feelings of uneasiness, worry and fear), and major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medication carts (South Hall Nurse Medication Cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure LVN C secured the South Hall Nurse Medication Cart, when it was not in use on 05/07/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 05/07/2025 starting at 1:22 PM, there was an unlocked medication cart next to the nurse's station. The housekeeper was cleaning and moved the unlocked medication cart to the opposite side of the hallway. The nurse was not observed near the medication cart or in the hallway. The housekeeper said she thought the nurse, LVN C, was at break. During an interview on 05/07/2025 at 1:27 PM, LVN C said she was on break, and the medication cart was hers. LVN C said she guessed she got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident's #1 and #9) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's psychotropic consent for trazadone (antidepressant), Xanax (antianxiety), lorazepam (antianxiety), and sertraline (antidepressant) reflected the clinical indication for use, the benefits of the medication, and the statement of consent. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's psychotropic consent form for Zyprexa (antipsychotic) reflected the resident or resident representative's signature for consent. These failures could place residents at risk for treatment or services provided without their informed consent. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promptly resolve grievances for 3 out of 24 residents (Resident's #42, #44, #47) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure Resident's #42, #44, and #47 grievances concerning coffee temperature were addressed. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and feelings of neglect. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/07/24, reflected Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs resulting in limited air flow into and out of the lungs). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/16/24, reflected Resident #42 had clear speech and usually understood others. The MDS reflected Resident #42 was usually able to understand others. The MDS reflected Resident #42 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis (treatment that filters water and waste from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do so) received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #49) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure all pre and post-dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #49. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving adequate care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet, dated 11/06/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fluid overload (which happens when there is too much fluid in your body. It can raise blood pressure, cause swelling, and impact organ function), End-Stage Renal Disease also known as ESRD (a permanent condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 1 storage area reviewed for expired and discontinued medications. The facility failed to keep a record of receipt of controlled medications awaiting disposition to allow accurate and periodic reconciliation. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 09:54 AM, the following medications were observed in a basket located inside the controlled medication closet located inside the DONs office, and were awaiting to be disposed: *Ativan/Benadryl 1mg/25mg/ml gel- 25 mls RX# 363926/001 *Hydrocodone-apap 5-325mg tablet (label 1 of 3)- 8 tablets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility did not ensure an 8 oz scoop size was used to serve the chicken alfredo during the lunch meal on 11/05/24. This failure could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: Record review of the facility dietary spreadsheet dated 06/04/24, indicated an 8 oz scoop size should be used to serve chicken alfredo. During an observation on 11/05/24 at 11:52 AM, a 6 oz scoop was being used to serve chicken alfredo. Approximately 10 resident trays had already been served and delivered. During an observation and interview on 11/05/24 at 11:56 AM, the Dietary Manager said the size of the scoop that was needed was documented on the dietary spreadsheet. The Dietary Manager said she posted the colors of each scoop size on the window in front of the serving table. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 19 residents (Resident's #22, #42, #44, and #47) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #22, #42, #44, and #47 who complained the food was served cold, was bland, and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: During an interview on 11/04/24 at 11:28 AM, Resident #42 stated the food was cold and did not have flavor. During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:02 PM, Resident #22 said she wished the facility had better food. Resident #22 said the food was bland. During an interview on 11/04/24 at 12:06 PM, Resident #47 stated she did not like the food. Resident #47 stated the vegetables were musty and very bland. Resident #47 said the food was cold when she received it. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to effectively maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including hand hygiene for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #48, Resident #44 and Resident#3) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN H changed gloves or performed hand hygiene while providing wound care for Resident #48's coccyx area. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA F did not wear Personal protective equipment and gloves in the hallway after assisting Resident #44 with his breakfast tray who was in contact isolation. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN B performed hand hygiene when she removed her gloves after she obtained Resident #3's blood sugar on 11/05/24 These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: 1.Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policy regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 smoking area. The facility failed to ensure flammable paper products (empty cigarette box, piece of a paper towel, blue sticky note, and a sonic cup) were not discarded in the red metal trash can designed for the disposing of cigarette butts. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm and lead to an unsafe smoking environment. Findings Included: During an observation on 11/5/24 at 8:24 a.m., 4 residents were outside in the smoking area smoking with staff present. There was a red smoking can with cigarette butts, an empty cigarette box, piece of a paper towel, blue sticky note, and a sonic cup. During an interview on 11/7/24 at 10:34 a.m., the HR Coordinator stated whoever take the residents out to smoke should check the red smoking can for trash. The HR Coordinator stated the red can should not have any trash inside, only ashes and butts. The HR Coordinator stated it was important to ensure trash was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to formulate an advanced directive was provided for 2 of 19 residents (Residents #40 and #44) reviewed for advanced directives. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #40's OOH-DNR included the physician signature and licensed number. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #44's full code status was discontinued after Resident #44 signed a DNR. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #40 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #40's physician order report, dated [DATE]-[DATE], indicated an active physician's order for code status: DNR with an order date [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility did not ensure Resident #42 was able to easily use the door to her room. This failure could place residents at risk for unmet needs and decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/07/24, reflected Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic pain, difficult in walking, muscle weakness, unsteadiness of feet, and lack of coordination. Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/16/24, reflected Resident #42 had clear speech and usually understood others. The MDS reflected Resident #42 was usually able to understand others. The MDS reflected Resident #42 had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected Resident #12 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and service of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for indwelling catheter. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's indwelling catheter securement device was in place. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's indwelling catheter drainage bag was kept from touching and resting on the floor. These failures could affect residents with an indwelling urinary catheter and place them at risk of at risk for urethral tears, discomfort, infection, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/07/24 indicated Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that occurs when urine flow is obstructed, either structurally or functionally),. Record review of a significant change in condition MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #30 rarely made himself understood and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 2 of 5 residents (Resident's #15 and Resident #11) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's oxygen was placed on 2 liters per nasal cannula as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to change oxygen tubing weekly on Sunday nights for Resident #11 and Resident #15. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. Finding included: 1.Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 11/06/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease also known as COPD, (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 49) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #49 had a trauma screening upon admission that identified possible triggers when Resident 49 had a history of trauma. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/07/24 indicated Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, Obstructive uropathy (a urinary tract disorder that occurs when urine flow is obstructed, by either structurally, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 24.24%, based on 8 errors out of 33 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #25) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 medications were administered during the scheduled time on 11/04/24. The facility failed to ensure LVN appropriately dosed Resident #25's MiraLAX on 11/05/24. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 11/06/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 medications were administered during the scheduled time of 6:00 AM and 10:00 AM on 11/04/24 which resulted in medications being administered 1 hour and 36 minutes late after the 1-hour grace period. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 4's medications were administered during the scheduled time of 6:00 AM and 10:00 AM on 11/05/24 which resulted in medications being administered 4 hour and 55 minutes late after the 1-hour grace period. These failures could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 11/06/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel, and labeled and dated correctly for 1 of 4 medication carts (south nurse's treatment cart) and 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3) observed for medication storage. 1. The facility did not ensure the south side nurse's treatment cart was secured and unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel on 11/05/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's insulin lispro pen was properly secured when LVN B left it on top of the nurse's treatment cart on 11/05/24. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 wound care supplies was properly safe and secured. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed and a drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 11/06/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not ensure Resident #1's updated plan of care and most recent medication list from the hospice were a part of their current medical records in the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/07/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 3 doors reviewed for a safe environment. The facility failed to ensure the wander guard system operated correctly on the north side door when the Maintenance Supervisor tested the door on 11/07/24. This failure could place residents at risk of elopement, injury, or harm. Findings included: During an observation on 11/07/24 at 9:54 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor checked the wander guard door on the north side hall and the alarm did not activate. He then checked the other 2 wander guard doors, and they were functioning properly. During an observation on 11/07/24 at 10:08 a.m., LVN D checked 2 different residents' wander guards using their handheld system and they both worked properly. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 10:13 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor said he checked the door for functionality last week (unknown day). He said the doors were functioning properly during the inspection. He said he checked the doors weekly as part of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility failed to prepare an adequate amount of food for the lunch meal on 10/29/24. This failure could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/29/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included liver cancer, cerebral vascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain, congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), and anemia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 6 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's physician of a weight loss of 9.8 lbs. in 8 days. These failures could result in residents with weight loss not receiving treatments, supplements, or nutrition needed to maintain acceptable and desired weight and nutritional needs for healing. Findings Include: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the sacral region (area located below the lumbar spine and above the tailbone),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician ordersto help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections were maintained for the facility for 1 of 2 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for parenteral fluids. The facility did not ensure Resident #1's central line (a tube that is inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, groin, or arm to give fluids, blood, medications, or to do medical tests quickly) dressing was changed every seven days per the physician's order. This failure could place residents at risk for central line associated bloodstream infections. Findings Included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 1/18/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. Expired food was not disposed of. 2. Food was not labeled or dated. 3. Kitchen equipment was not kept free of carbon buildup. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: During an observation on 10/09/23 at 9:00 a.m., a cast iron skillet was on the stove that was used to cook breakfast. The cast iron skillet was observed with a thick layer of carbon buildup. The cast iron stove top had a thick layer of carbon buildup. Inside the refrigerator it was observed that a tub of cottage cheese was out of date, 10/04/2023. It was observed 8 bags of hotdog buns without dates or labels and no expiration date was printed on bag. It was observed that a loaf of bread was opened and laying on a serving table with no date or label and no expiration date printed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not ensure Resident #33's quarterly MDS identified a medication as an anti-platelet instead of an anticoagulant. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet, dated 10/11/23, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain). Record review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/20/23, indicated in Section N0410 Medications Received item E. Anticoagulant was marked as having been given for the last 7 days. The instructions for this section read, Indicate the number of DAYS the resident received the following medications by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for respiratory care and services. (Resident #142) The facility failed to administer oxygen at 3 liters via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #142. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #142's face sheet dated 10/10/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #142's diagnoses included pneumonia (infection of the air sacs in one or both lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), and malignant neoplasm of mandible (jaw cancer). Record review of Resident #142's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for one of one medication room reviewed for medications storage (North Side Medication Room). The facility failed to remove an expired medication from the North Side Medication Room. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications. Findings included: During an observation on 10/11/23 at 09:47 AM, this surveyor reviewed the North Side Medication Room with RN A. A 2mL vial of Lidocaine HCL injection 1% (a medication used to alleviate pain and discomfort by numbing the targeted area of the body) was found with an expiration date of September 2013. During an interview on 01/11/23 at 09:55 AM, RN A said the expired lidocaine vial should not have been in the medication room. She said it was missed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the use of psychotropic medications was documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs (Resident #30). The facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #30's side effects regarding her antidepressant medication. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 10/10/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #30's diagnoses included depression, anxiety, congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #30's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NOCONA HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/10/2021
MEEKINS, GREGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/10/2021
2901 STERLING HART DR OPCO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2026
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/11/2026
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2026
2901 STERLING HART DR PROPERTY OWNER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
CORRERA, KRISTYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2024
SELVAGGI, RICHARDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 9%Other / private 16%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,170per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$248per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675788. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next