No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Epic Nursing & Rehabilitation

3210 W Hwy 22, Corsicana, TX 75110 · For profit - Corporation · 119 certified beds · (903) 872-4880 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$31,686 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607, F0609) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,686 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3124 W State Highway 22 · (903) 872-8344 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Aldi1.0 mi
3623 W State Highway 31 · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N 45th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.6%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.8%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.1%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.8%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.462.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.572.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.61U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.33hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.7%CMS range 24.0–53.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.0–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified41.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.401.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 64.6 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.89 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.99 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #4) of seven reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to:1) Ensure Resident #1 did not engage in sexual activity with Resident #2 on 9/24/2025.2) Ensure Resident #2 did not engage in inappropriate behavior on 9/18/2025, 9/19/2025 and 9/24/2025.3) Ensure CNA D did not grab Resident #4's wrist forcefully and shake her arm in the presence of therapy staff on 9/3/2025. On 9/26/2025 at 6:40 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/3/2025, the facility remained at a level of actual no actual harm at a scope of pattern that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and psychosocial harm.Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #4) of seven reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to:1) Ensure Resident #1 did not engage in sexual activity with Resident #2 on 9/24/2025.2) Ensure Resident #2 did not engage in inappropriate behavior on 9/18/2025, 9/19/2025 and 9/24/2025.3) Ensure CNA D did not grab Resident #4's wrist forcefully and shake her arm in the presence of therapy staff on 9/3/2025. On 9/26/2025 at 6:40 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 10/3/2025, the facility remained at a level of actual no actual harm at a scope of pattern that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and psychosocial harm. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse to the Administrator for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5) reviewed for Abuse and Neglect.[KS1] [LP2] The facility staff failed to immediately report abuse and neglect to the Administrator when: 1) Resident #1 was observed engaging in sexual activity with Resident #2 on 9/24/2025.2) Resident #2 was observed engaging in inappropriate behavior with Resident #1 on 9/18/2025 and 9/24/2025.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 9/29/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/29/2025 at 2:00 pm. While the IJ was removed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents and hazards.The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 did not elope from the facility on 09/10/25. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past noncompliance). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 09/10/25 and ended on 09/15/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for falls, injuries, and hospitalization.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 did not elope from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not elope from the facility on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not elope from the facility [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) existed from [DATE] - [DATE]. The IJ was determined to be at past noncompliance as the facility had implemented actions that corrected the deficient practice prior to the beginning of the investigation. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for falls, injuries, dehydration, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission recorded dated [DATE] documented a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses included: unspecified dementia (loss of memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening condition of clinical complications for one of eight residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's FM was notified when he hit another resident on 6/25/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of life and risk of not having their responsible party represent them in medical and care decisions.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/26/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: Epilepsy (seizure disorder), Dementia (decline in mental ability), high blood pressure, anxiety disorder, and major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and other officials including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State and law through established procedures for one of eight (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Nursing facility staff failed to report to the Administrator that Resident #1 was observed hitting another resident on 6/25/2026 at 1:30 pm. This failure could place residents at risk of not being protected from abuse, neglect, or exploitation.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 6/26/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #8, Resident #66, and Resident #70) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #8, Resident #66, and Resident #70 did not have long, and dirty fingernails.This failure could place residents at risk of skin tears, infection, and embarrassment.1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 05/26/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dysphagia (trouble swallowing), muscle wasting, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, pain, vomiting, hypertension (high blood pressure), and localized edema (swelling). Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/19/2026, reflected a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive response.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure CK B wore a hair net on his beard.2. The facility failed to ensure CK B washed his hands when changing tasks.3. The facility failed to ensure DA A washed hands when changing tasks. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for food borne illness. During an observation on initial tour of the kitchen on 05/26/2026 at 9:11 a.m., it was revealed that CK B failed to use a hair net to cover facial hair while preparing puree food. During a kitchen observation on 05/26/2026 at 10:55 a.m., it was revealed that CK B failed to wash hands prior to pureeing ham. CK B failed to wash hands after returning to the food preparation area from loading the pureed ham food canister in the oven. It was observed that CK B failed to wash hands before preparing puree of turnip greens or upon completion of the puree preparation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it formulated, adopted, and enforced policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #15, Resident #35, and Resident #44) reviewed for smoking. 1. The facility failed to complete a smoking assessment for Resident #15. 2. The facility failed to complete a smoking assessment for Resident #35. 3. The facility failed to complete a smoking assessment for Resident#44. This failure placed all residents at risk for serious injury, harm, due to staff not knowing if the resident was safe or needed assistance to smoke.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 05/26/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had a diagnosis which included nicotine dependance (chronic addiction in which the brain adapts to regular nicotine exposure causing cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and difficulty quitting), lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #15, and Resident #67) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's annual MDS, dated [DATE], accurately reflected her smoking status. The facility failed to ensure Resident #67's admission MDS, dated [DATE], accurately reflected his smoking status. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate supervision due to an inaccurate assessment for smoking status.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 05/26/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #15 had a diagnosis which included nicotine dependance (chronic addiction in which the brain adapts to regular nicotine exposure causing cravings, withdrawal symptoms, and difficulty quitting), lack of coordination, hypokalemia (low potassium), bipolar (extreme mood swings), and dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for residents that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that meet professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 1 (Resident #44) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of Resident#44's re-admission date of 05/02/26. This failure could result in residents not receiving prescribed care while in the facility.Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot maintain adequate oxygen levels or remove carbon dioxide effectively, often requiring ongoing treatment and oxygen support), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to use services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week from 3/30/2026 to 5/7/2026 For one of one nursing facility reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to have RN coverage on 3/30/2026, 4/8/2026, 4/13/2026, 4/17/2026, 4/22/2026, 5/1/2026, 5/6/2026, and 5/7/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services from an RN, and decreased quality of life.During a record review on 5/8/2026 at 5:16 pm with the ADM present, of Daily timecard, period: 3/22/26 to 5/8/26, reflected no time entries for an RN for 3/30/2026, 4/8/2026, 4/13/2026, 4/17/2026, 4/22/2026, 5/1/2026, 5/6/2026, and 5/7/2026. During an interview on 5/8/2026 at 5:16 pm, ADM stated there were no entries on the Daily timecard report for RN coverage 3/30/2026, 4/8/2026, 4/13/2026, 4/17/2026, 4/22/2026, 5/1/2026, 5/6/2026, and 5/7/2026. During an interview on 5/8/2026 at 1:44 pm, the DON stated they have sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. She stated the facility has had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan after she was seen in bed with Resident #2 on 9/18/2025[KS1] [LP2] and after a sexual activity incident on 9/24/2025. The facility failed to update Resident #2's care plan after inappropriate behaviors were noted on 9/18/2025, 9/19/2025 and 9/24/2025.[KS3] [LP4] The facility failed to care plan interventions to routinely monitor Resident #3 when an initial elopement assessment was completed 06/03/24[KS5] [LP6] . This failure placed residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met, a delay in services, and not receiving adequate care to meet their needs.Findings included: Resident #1 Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative of the change] in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when she was found lying in bed with Resident #2 on 9/18/2025. This failure placed residents at risk of a decreased quality of life and risk of not having their responsible party represent them in medical and care decisions.Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 9/26/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including d[dementia (group of brain disorders that cause progressive cognitive decline), anemia (low blood iron level), insomnia (problems falling and staying asleep), hypokalemia (low blood levels of potassium), and acute respiratory failure. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment, dated 9/5/2025, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of property and exploitation for 1 of 6 (Resident #5) reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was free from exploitation when the BOM took Resident #5's net spend credit card and used the card for personal use. The BOM used Resident #5's credit card and withdrew funds totaling $3700. This failure could place residents at risk of financial hardships and a decrease in resident's quality of life.Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission record dated 10/02/25 documented a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 had diagnoses included major depressive disorder (sadness), cognitive communication deficit (inability to communicate effective), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/23/25, revealed the resident had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-03 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an initial comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of the resident's functional capacity within 14 days of admission for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed for Comprehensive Assessments being completed timely. The facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for Resident #2 within 14 days of admission. This failure placed newly admitted residents at risk of not having care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided to meet these needs.Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 9/26/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia (group of brain disorders that cause progressive cognitive decline), Parkinson's disease (progressive neurological disorder that affects movement, balance and coordination), hypotension (low blood pressure), anxiety disorder and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to use services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. The facility failed to have an RN at the facility on 8/11 to 8/15/2025, 8/18 to 8/22/2025, 8/25 to 8/28/2025, and 9/1/2025, 9/2/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care and services of an RN, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 9/3/2025 at 11:22 am of the Daily Nurse Staffing Report posting reflected zero scheduled RN hours. Further observation on the 9/3/2025 at 11:22 am of the Daily Nurse Staffing Report reflected zero schedule RN hours. During an interview on 9/3/2025 at 12:15 pm, the DON stated she was not aware that her RN hours could not be used to fulfill the RN staffing hours requirement. She stated she was not familiar with the average daily census requirement and thought her RN hours in addition to the weekend RNs that worked would cover all the required RN hours. The DON stated she was responsible for nurse staffing hours but was not aware her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which includes the accurate acquiring and administering of medications to meet the needs for 35 out of 72 residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that:The facility failed to provide morning medications for 35 out of 72 residents on 8/31/2025 resulting in 305 medication errors. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, could result in worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/4/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Cerebral Infarction (Stroke - brain attack), history of falling, Dementia (progressive cognitive disease), and Major Depressive Disorder (behavioral health disorder). Review of Resident #1's annual MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 14 suggesting no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #4) reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to ensure that bleach was not attainable for Resident #4 on 08/26/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents and hazards.Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 09/04/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4 has the following diagnoses: anxiety disorder (feelings of worry or fear are so intense and constant that they don't go away), unspecified dementia (loss of normal brain function that makes it hard to remember, think, speak, and do other everyday tasks), schizophrenia (brain disorder where a person has trouble telling what's real from what's not, leading to a disconnect from reality), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication that stem from a problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 5 halls reviewed for environment. The facility did not address moisture damage and discoloration in the ceiling on the hallway in the secure unit. This failure could place residents at risk of not living in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment.The findings included: During on observation on 09/03/2025 at 11:37am, the ceiling in the hallway in the secure unit had water stains and a black substance in the ceiling. During an interview with LVN C on 09/03/2025 at 11:40am, LVN C stated that the ceiling has been like that for a while. LVN C stated the water stains and black substance were cause by an air condition leak in the ceiling. LVN C stated that black substance appeared to be mold to her. LVN C stated a negative outcome would be respiratory issues from the mold. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 09/03/2025 at 11:45am, Maintenance Director stated that he was aware of the water stains in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 8 days of the 6-month review period, reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure the facility maintained the required RN coverage for 8 days between April - June 2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Review of CMS PBJ staffing reports reflected the facility triggered for no RN hours for FY Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30), revealed the facility did not have the required Registered Nurses coverage of at least 8 consecutive hours a day for the following dates: 04/07/24 no hours recorded. 05/04/24 no hours recorded. 05/05/24 no hours recorded. 05/18/24 no hours recorded. 05/19/24 no hours recorded. 06/01/24 no hours recorded. 06/15/24 no hours recorded. 06/16/24 no hours recorded. During an interview on 02/19/25, at 2:15 PM with the DON who stated when asked what does the facility do when there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the tray-serving area was cleaned on 02/18/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the opened packages of food in the dry goods pantry were sealed properly after opening on 02/18/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure the desert was covered until ready to serve on 02/19/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore the appropriate hair covering while food was being prepared in the main kitchen on 02/19/25. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings include: Observations on 02/18/25 from 10:40 AM to 11:37 AM in the facility's main kitchen revealed: The ice machine had dried white drip stains on the door of the machine. There were brownish and white stains and build up above the door, where the front panel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 (Resident #71) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71's handheld mouthpiece (device through which medication is inhaled) for his nebulizer (turns liquid medication into a mist) was properly stored when not in use on 02/19/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #71's Face Sheet, dated 02/19/2025, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #71 had diagnoses which included influenza (contagious respiratory infection) and acute (sudden onset) cough. Record review of Resident #71's Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eight residents (Resident #22 and Resident #38) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #22 on 02/12/2025. 2.The facility failed to ensure LVN B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing wound care to Resident #38 on 02/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #22's Face Sheet, dated 02/12/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on 08/05/2020. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included dementia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to document fluid intake for Residents #1 according to physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (occurs when the heart cannot pump enough blood and oxygen to the body), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty paying attention to a conversation, staying on topic, remembering information) essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure with no clear, identifiable cause), and Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the allegation was verified appropriate corrective action was taken for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect . The facility failed to report, on 02/01/2025, the results of an investigation of an allegation of Abuse and Neglect involving Resident #1 when she had an unwitnessed fall on 01/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse or neglect without appropriate corrective actions being taken. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/07/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for bathing. The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #1 and Resident #2 in compliance with their shower schedules. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in their sense of well-being and level of satisfaction with life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, disorientation, Encephalopathy (a change in brain function causing confusion and agitation that may leave temporary or permanent brain damage), muscle wasting and atrophy, and cerebral infarction (when blood flow to a part of the brain is obstructed). Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan reflected Resident #1's physician's order dated 11/15/2024 diet was regular, puree, and nectar thick liquids. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for receiving improper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet undated reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnosis was Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), and mild protein-calorie malnutrition (undernutrition characterized by poor growth). A record review of Resident #1's Initial MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent LVN A, on 07/28/24, from physically abusing Resident #1 when she hit Resident #1 in the right arm. These failures could place resident at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #1 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (type of paralysis that affects one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (an infection that affects part of the urinary tract, and muscle wasting and atrophy (when muscles waste away). Review of the Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #1 dated 05/21/24 reflected a BIMS score of 11 which indicated Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation and exploitation of property for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. (Resident #2) The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from misappropriation/exploitation by allowing CNA C to take money from Resident #2 for CNA C's own well-being and personal expenses, exact date unknown. This failure could place residents who resided in this facility at risk of misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paraplegia (a chronic condition that affects the lower half of the body, causing loss of muscle function and sensory or motor impairment), idiopathic scoliosis (a spinal condition that causes the spine to curve abnormally to the side, sometimes in the shape of an S or C) urinary tract infection (an infection that affects part of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported an allegation to the abuse coordinator when CNAA reported on 07/29/24 to DON that LVN A had hit Resident #1 in the arm on 07/28/24. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of abuse if the reportable allegations are not reported timely after they are discovered. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #1 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: Spastic hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (type of paralysis that affects one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (an infection that affects part of the urinary tract, and muscle wasting and atrophy (when muscles waste away). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected that Resident #1 had an active diagnosis of dementia. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/18/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer cell form in the tissues of the prostate), lack of coordination (difficulties in controlling and organizing movements), type 2 diabetes mellitus with proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema (advance stage where abnormal new blood vessels grow on the surface of the retina), Schizoaffective disorder (a mental health problem where you experience…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress, including his/her response to treatments and/or services, and changes in his/her condition for 1of 4 residents (Resident #1) review for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/18/2024 reflected his current diagnosis of dementia. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07-18-24 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer cell form in the tissues of the prostate), lack of coordination (difficulties in controlling and organizing movements), type 2 diabetes mellitus with proliferative diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was cleaned, groomed, and free from the strong odor or urine; Resident #2 was cleaned, groomed, and free from the strong odor or urine; and, Resident #3 had adequate staff to help stand and ambulate to the bathroom to use the toilet. This failure placed residents at the facility at risk of diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review or Resident #1's undated AR reflected a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (which was a condition of the body that disrupted how the body used sugar for fuel) and paraplegia, complete (which was symptom having affected the lower legs due to spinal cord injury or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that were present within that population when determining staffing requirements for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for staffing. The facility failed to schedule nursing staff for resident care based on an evaluation of pertinent information about the residents that may affect the services the facility must provide. This failure placed residents at the facility in risk of having their needs unmet. Findings included: Record review or Resident #1's undated AR reflected a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (which was a condition of the body that disrupted how the body used sugar for fuel) and paraplegia, complete (which was symptom having affected the lower legs due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for two (2) (WS#1 and WS#2) of seven (7) stationary computer workstations reviewed for resident privacy. The facility failed to ensure Computer Workstation #1 (nurses station) and Workstation #2 (100 hall) were not left open, unattended, and visible to resident medical records. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of exposure of their personal information to unauthorized individuals. Findings included: During an observation on 2/9/2024 at 10:52 am, workstation (WS) #1 at the nurses station was observed to be unattended with a resident face sheet visible. Further observation revealed a staff member came up to WS#1, put down her cup and walked away leaving screen remaining visible and unattended. At 10:56 am, the computer automatically locked the screen. There were two staff, one resident, one visitor, and two investigators in the vicinity of WS#1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 4 of 8 residents (Residents #12, #42, #45 and Resident #63) reviewed for accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 and Resident #42's call light buttons were located within each residents reach. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45 and Resident #63's call light pull strings, in their individual bathrooms, were free from entanglement and extended the maximum distance from the wall mount to the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of unmet physical needs and psychological anguish. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #12's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 14) reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's Annual MDS Assessment reflected the use of bed rails. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: A record review of Resident #14's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #14's diagnosis which include other seizures (uncontrolled burst of electrical activity between brain cells that cause temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements), abnormal posture (rigid body movements and chronic abnormal position of the body), muscle weakness (lack of strength in muscles), parkinsonism (disorder that affects the nervous system and parts of the body controlled by the nerves), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). A record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative and effort which includes referring all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon significant change in status assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #53) reviewed for PASARR. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening which indicated a diagnosis of mental illness on 03/22/2022. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #53's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #72) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for Resident #19 which included measurable objectives and timetables to meet and implement the residents medical nursing mental and psychological needs . The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for Resident #72 which included measurable objectives and timetables to meet and implement the residents medical nursing mental and psychological needs . This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferences, choices, and goals met during their stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that was not possible or the resident preferences indicated otherwise for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for nutrition status maintenance. The facility failed to measure and record Resident #4's body weight, as ordered by the resident's physician, for two consecutive months (November 2023 and December 2023.) This failure could place residents at risk of weight loss, weight gain, nutritional deficit, and adverse health consequences. Findings include: Record review of Resident #4's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses which included other Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Disease (which was a diagnosed medical classification influenced by a disease of how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, which include tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's nebulizer masks and tubing were covered. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #13's Care plan, dated 11/13/23, reflected Resident #13 was care planned for potential complication related to diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with an approach to administer Nebulizer treatments and / or inhalers as ordered. Monitor for effectiveness, side effects. Record review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] , reflected Resident #13 had a BIMS score of 05, which indicated severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to order Resident #28's Coreg (carvedilol) 3.125 mg, (for hypertension), in a timely manner. The failure could place residents at risk of medicinal adverse effects, decreased health status and being hospitalized . Findings include: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure (a condition that occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should); other psychoactive substance use; dehydration; hypertension (high blood pressure); and COPD (trouble breathing). Record review of Resident #28's Active Physicians Orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 6.45%, based on 2 errors out of 31 opportunities, which involved 2 of 4 residents (Residents #28 and Resident #47) observed during medication administration for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 received Coreg (carvedilol) 3.125 mg, (for hypertension) as ordered by the physician. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47 received Tramadol/Acetaminophen 37.5-325, 2 tablets (for chronic pain) as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes. Findings include: Record review of Resident #28's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure (a condition that occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should); other psychoactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Tag: 880 S/S= F Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 4 halls located within the facility. The facility failed to slow the spread of covid 19 by staff not wearing mask when in the facility while current covid 19 outbreak was occurring. The facility failed to ensure dirty soiled linens were properly discarded to the laundry. These failures could place residents at risk for covid 19 infection and communicable diseases. Findings included: A) In an observation on 8/12/23 at10:08 AM upon entry to the facility there were no postings on the front door or notification that the facility was having a covid 19 outbreak. No mask was available at the front door. No staff was observed wearing mask when entering the facility. Staff answered the door with no mask in place. Three nurses were sitting at nurses' station with no mask in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,686 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $22,859 — penalty dated 2025-10-03
  • $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2025
PRICE, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2025
3210 W HWY 22 OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2026
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025
3210 W HWY 22 PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
MALIK, BOBBYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
TAYLOR, ELIZABETHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+29.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 17%Other / private 4%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$209per resident / day
operating cost
$6,361per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676295. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next