Avir at El Paso
7441 Paseo Del Norte, El Paso, TX 79911 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (915) 842-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (93) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $192,681 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.7% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.6% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.2%CMS range 27.5–43.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.1–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 58.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 6.3–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 111.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
93 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Residents #1) of 8 resident reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for Resident #1 when, on 8/3/25, Receptionist A allowed him to leave the building without confirming with staff whether he could be outside independently or verifying if he was a visitor. Resident #1 made it across the border to another state and then to the port of entry to another country. Resident #1 required hospital treatment for dehydration. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 8/3/25 and ended 8/4/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures placed residents at risk of injuries, hospitalization, and death.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 8/13/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards of quality for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for care, in that: The facility failed to provide care that included but not limited to assessing, evaluating, and responding to residents needs for Resident #1. On 08/10/24, LVN D did not conduct a thorough assessment of Resident #1 when informed by CNA C that Resident #1's family informed her the resident had stopped talking while eating and spit out a piece of meat. LVN D did not have her stethoscope to check lung sounds. LVN D, when the family requested 911 be called, responded that they (the family) could call 911 if they wanted. LVN D did not go back to re-assess Resident #1 to determine if the resident needed the Heimlich maneuver, or stay with the resident to observe her eating to determine if there was a problem with her eating or swallowing. The family contacted 911, and EMS took Resident #1 to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for change in condition. On 08/10/24 around 2PM, CNA B failed to report to LVN D that CNA B observed Resident #1 had blue lips and difficulty breathing. CNA B failed to report Resident #1's change in condition to LVN D so that LVN D could reassess Resident #1. LVN D, when notified by the family that they were requesting 911 called responded that they (the family) could call 911 if they wanted. LVN D failed to re-assess Resident #1 by not checking her lung sounds, attempting the Heimlich maneuver, and staying with the Resident #1 to determine if she was choking, aspirating, or developing difficulty with chewing or swallowing. The Family contacted 911 and EMS arrived and transferred Resident #1 to the hospital. Resident #1 was intubated at the local hospital, and expired on 08/11/24. An IJ (immediate jeopardy) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to place Resident #1's bed low to the ground and place the fall mat next to the bed while Resident #1 was in bed. This led to Resident #1 on 06/22/24 having her left arm/hand caught in between the grab bars (enablers) and the mattress, her right back shoulder hit the tray table, her right arm hit the trash can, and her rear hit the ground while her legs slid underneath the bed. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/26/24 at 4:24 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/27/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of no actual harm and a severity level of isolated because the facility was continuing to monitor its plan of removal for effectiveness. This failure could place residents who are at risk for falls, injury, or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for base line care plans.The facility failed to develop Resident #1's baseline care plan within 48 hours of re-admission on [DATE].This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increasing resident safety and safeguarding against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission.Finding included:Record review of Resident #1's face-sheet dated 06/09/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with admission date 06/02/26 and initial admission date 05/23/26.Record review of Resident #1's history and physical dated 04/06/26 revealed a medical history of the following: Traumatic Brain Injury severe with IPH…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for records.-The facility failed to ensure RN C documented attempts to contact the family of Resident #2 after their fall on 05/26/26.-RN C inaccurately documented she notified the family of Resident #2 after their fall on 05/26/26 at 7AM.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having accurate documentation.Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's face-sheet dated 06/09/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old female resident with admission date 08/26/24, and initial admission date 05/09/24.Record review of Resident #2's history and physical dated 06/03/26 revealed the following medical history: Dementia (syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident resided and received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #56, #65, #96, and #109) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure resident call light was within reach for Resident #56, #65, #96, and #109 on 05/04/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of having their needs unmet when they were unable to contact staff.1. Record review of Resident #56's face-sheet, dated 05/06/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #56's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/20/2026, revealed a BIMS score of 0, meaning severe cognitive impairment. Under Section GG- Functional Abilities, the resident was dependent on staff for assistance for eating, hygiene, showering, dressing, transfers, and repositioning. Under Section H- Bladder and Bowel, the resident was coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 6 of 24 residents (Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #54, Resident #65, Resident #128, Resident #129) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's, Resident #15's, Resident #65's, nails were trimmed, cleaned, and filed on 05/04/2026.The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's, Resident #128's, and Resident #129's nails were trimmed and filed on 05/04/2026.The facility failed to ensure Resident #111's toenails were trimmed and filed on 05/04/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.1.Record review of Resident #13's face-sheet, dated 05/06/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure biologicals were stored in locked compartments and accessed by authorized personnel for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #74, and Resident #89) of 24 residents reviewed for medication storage.The facility failed to dispose of a dixie cup on 05/04/2026 by leaving a dixie cup with Zinc Oxide pomade (skin ointment) at Resident #3's, Resident #74's, and Resident #89's bedside, exposed and within reach of other residents.The facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when unattended.This failure could place residents at risk of access to medications not approved for administration by their physician. Findings included: 3. Record review of Resident #89's face sheet dated 05/04/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] and 02/22/2026. Record review of Resident #89's Annual History and Physical, dated 07/08/2025, revealed the resident had diagnoses which included Non-Alzheimer's dementia (a decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation and food storage. -The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to ensure employee sodas were not stored in the walk-in refrigerator.-The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to ensure a turkey in the walk-in freezer was labeled with a receive and use by date.-The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to ensure Dietary Aide E and Dietary Aide M did not grabbed drinking cups from the opening with barehand 13 times.-The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to ensure [NAME] J did not grabbed 5 bowls with bare hands by the interior portion of the bowl.-The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to ensure Dietary Aide L stored approximately 75 peanut butter and jelly halved sandwiches in the dry storage area after completion for approximately 30 minutes. This failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: During initial kitchen tour observation and interview on 05/04/2026 at 8:35 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters (Dumpster #1 and #2) reviewed for garbage disposal . -The facility failed to ensure the dumpster #1 and #2 was closed on 05/04/2026.-The facility failed to properly dispose/save 2 bed frames (1 nonrepairable), air conditioning unit, and lamp post light housing that was left outside the facility laundry room on 05/04/2026 thru 05/06/2026.- The facility failed to ensure dumpster #1 and was closed on 05/05/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of infestation of rodents and insects.Findings included:During initial kitchen tour on 05/04/2026 at 9:00 AM with the Dietary Director, it was observed dumpster #1 and #2 were left open by the dumpster access doors on both sides. At 9:03 AM, 2 bed frames, an air conditioning unit, and lamp post light housing was observed in a patio area outside the facility laundry room. A follow-up observation on 05/05/2026 at 1:35 PM revealed that the inoperable equipment outside the facility laundry room was still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident # 1 and Resident #39) of 8 resident's reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's nasal canula was properly stored while oxygen was not in use.The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to properly monitor and store Resident #1's dentures and did not placed them in a denture cup, and they were left exposed in a see through plastic clear cup without a lid on it. These failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination resulting in acquired infection or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet revealed the resident's original admission date was 06/24/2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's room was equipped to assure full privacy for each resident by providing ceiling suspended curtain that extended around the bed for 1 of 5 (Resident #75) residents reviewed for privacy. -The facility failed on 05/04/2026 to 05/06/2026 to provide a privacy curtain to Resident #75 in a shared room. This failure placed the resident at risk for not having privacy to his side of the room, experiencing embarrassment, and a decreased sense of self-esteem. Findings included: Resident #75 Record review of Resident #75's admission sheet dated 05/06/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date on 05/14/2024. Record review of Resident #75's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] revealed under Section C (Cognitive patterns) revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 3 with the significance being the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Under Section GG (Functional Abilities) the resident was coded for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff providing services for 2 of 7 employees (CNA A and Dietary Aide E) reviewed for training completions. -The facility failed to ensure CNA A received annual training for 6 training subjects reviewed on 05/06/2026.-The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide E received annual training for 4 training subjects reviewed on 05/06/2026. This failure places residents at risk to receive services or care from a staff member who was not informed on procedures.Findings included: Record review on 05/06/2026 at 1:07 PM, HR Coordinator provided a completed document of 7 employees sampled for personnel files review. The document revealed that CNA A had a hire date of December 2024 and was missing the following trainings: communication, infection control, compliance and ethics, HIV, restraint reduction, and prevention of falls. Dietary Aide E had a hire date of December 2023 and was missing the following trainings: communication, infection control, HIV, and restraint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 79 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for fall assessment after an unwitnessed fall. The facility failed to ensure LVN P appropriately assessed Resident #1 following an unwitnessed fall on 03/14/2026. This failure could affect others by placing them at risk for complications related to untreated injuries.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/21/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included fracture of left pubis (crack or break in the hip bone area), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, fracture of acetabulum (break in the hip socket), pain in left hip, muscle wasting (loss of muscle tissue), attention and concentration deficit (neurodevelopment issue where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services and 3 of 4 medication carts (Halls 100, 200, and 300) reviewed for medications.- The facility failed to ensure timely acquisition of Resident #2's Lyricand was not administered per physician's orders.- The facility failed to ensure timely acquisition of Resident #3's Pregabalin and was not administered per physician's orders.- The facility failed to ensure timely acquisition of Resident #4's Tramadol and was not administered per physician's orders.-The facility failed to ensure licensed staff signed off on the Controlled Drugs-Count Records after verifying all controlled substances in the medication cart were accounted for with the on-coming nurse at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that incidents and investigations were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 6 (Resident #1 and #2) residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness of records. 1. The facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation and investigation for an allegation of misappropriation and exploitation for Resident # 1. 2. The facility failed to complete an incident report or accurately document progress notes, when Resident # 2 exited the facility. These deficient practices could put residents at risk of not receiving needed services such as monitoring or supervision, and incident investigations. Findings included: Resident # 1 Record Review of the admission record dated 6/30/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 11/27/24 and a readmission date of 12/18/24.Record Review of the Initial Evaluation dated 11/27/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis of type two diabetes, coronary artery disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to maintain a system to prevent Resident #1's personal money from being taken by a staff member.Findings included:Record Review of the admission record dated 6/30/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 11/27/24 and a readmission date of 12/18/24. Record Review of Resident # 1's admission MDS record dated 11/27/24 revealed a BIMS score of 2 reflecting severe cognitive impairment. MDS revealed Resident #1 had short-term memory problems and was moderately impaired to make decisions regarding tasks of daily life. It described the resident as lethargic (a state of extreme tiredness, sluggishness, and lack of energy or enthusiasm. It implies a noticeable decrease in physical and mental activity). MDS indicated Resident #2 had anxiety disorder and depression.Record Review of Resident # 1's Care Plan initiated on 11/29/24 revealed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of depression and at risk of fluctuating moods with little interest or pleasure in doing things with decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to provide supervision when Resident #2 exited the facility on 6/23/25 and propelled herself in her wheelchair down towards the sidewalk exiting the parking lot of the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of a fall, weather exposure, or being run over by a moving vehicle, which could result in injuries. Scope and Severity D Findings include:Record Review of Resident #2's admission record dated 6/26/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 4/22/25.Record Review of Resident #2's History and Physical dated 4/24/25 revealed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (An irregular and often rapid heart rate that can lead to symptoms like palpitations, shortness of breath, and fatigue), hypothyroidism (A condition in which the thyroid gland doesn't produce enough crucial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and LVN B communicate to the physician the need to administer medications while pending G-Tube placement result from KUB. This failure could place residents at risk of unmet medical needs and a decreased in quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's hospital transfer form not dated revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of: Attention and concentration deficit (Difficulty staying focused or paying attention, which can affect daily tasks and communication); Cognitive communication deficit (Problems with thinking and using language, such as trouble understanding, speaking, or remembering words); Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure labratory services were provided to meet the needs of the resident in accordance with professional standards of practice, and for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for labratory service. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed up with diagnostic lab for Resident #1's stat KUB order. This failure could place residents at risk of delayed treatment, unmet medical needs, and a decreased in quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's hospital transfer form not dated revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of: Attention and concentration deficit (Difficulty staying focused or paying attention, which can affect daily tasks and communication); Cognitive communication deficit (Problems with thinking and using language, such as trouble understanding, speaking, or remembering words); Unspecified dementia (general decline in memory and thinking skills, often due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs for 2 (Residents #1 and 2) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and 2's diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) was addressed on their care plan. This failure could place resident at risk for not having their individual needs met in a timely manner injury, and a decline in physical well-being. Findings included. Review of Resident #1 face sheet, dated 04/10/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 01/07/2022 and a readmission date of 01/01/2025 to the facility with a diagnosis of dysphagia oropharyngeal phase(difficulty moving food and liquids from back of the mouth to esophagus). Review of Resident #1's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 had moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 3 (Residents #5, #16 and #26 ) of 9 residents reviewed for dignity. Resident #16 did not have a privacy bag on his catheter bag. Resident# 5 and Resident# 26 had their names written on their clothes with black marker across their chest. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life. Findings included: Resident #5 Record Review of Resident # 5's admission Record dated 3/6/25 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission of 8/1/23 and a readmission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included attention and concentration deficit, depression, unspecified dementia, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit and depressive episodes. Record Review of Resident # 5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences involving the call light for of 5 residents of 18 (Resident #76 #91, #278, #284, #286) in that: - Resident #76 had no access to his call light which was hanging behind his bed and in between the foot of his bed. - Resident #91 had no access to his call light which was lying on the floor at the foot of his bed. - Resident #278 did not have access to his call light which was lying on the floor next to his bed. - Resident #284 had no access to his call light which was lying on the floor. -Resident #286 did not have access to his call light which was hanging on the resident's bed frame. This deficient practice could affect the residents in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Resident #76 Record Review of Resident #76's admission Record dated 3/3/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 9/25/23. His…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 3 (Resident #28, Resident #57, and Resident #284) of 16 residents reviewed for foot care. -The facility's CNA's and licensed nurses failed to provide foot care for Resident #28, Resident #57, and Resident #284. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for poor foot health, decreased personal hygiene, and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Resident #28 Record review of Resident #28's admission Record dated 03/05/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 09/25/2021 and a readmission date of 04/08/2024. His diagnoses included: cerebral infraction unspecified, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food sanitation and storage, in that: -The facility failed to ensure gallon of liquid in the refrigerator was properly closed. -The facility failed to ensure tub of chocolate icing was free from dried drippings around lid. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 03/03/25 at 9:04 a.m. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a tub of chocolate icing with dried dripping around lid and a gallon of red liquid not properly closed. During an interview on 03/06/25 at 3:30 p.m. with the kitchen cook, revealed she was trained to keep all containers clean after each use and properly sealed. She stated she was trained to clean the container with a damp cloth and sanitizer. She stated staff were supposed to make sure all containers and gallons were closed properly after each use. It was the responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. - The facility failed to ensure Residents # 13, 16 and 82's indwelling catheter tubing was not on the floor. - The facility failed to keep linen cart covers in the laundry room free of tears. These failures could affect the residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings included: Resident # 13 Record Review of Resident #13's admission Record dated 3/3/25 revealed an 82-year-female with an initial admission date of 5/18/23 and a readmission date of 1/13/24. Her diagnosis included chronic kidney disease stage four severe and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (occurs when the nerves that control the bladder and its related muscles don't function properly). Record Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 of the facility's laundry department and 1 tankless water heater reviewed for patient care equipment in safe operating condition. -The facility failed to maintain dryer in operation condition. -The facility failed to ensure the residents for hallway 200 of the facility had hot water in their showers and bathrooms. These failures could place residents at risk for harm by the facility's inability to provide clean sanitary linens and could place residents at risk for poor hygiene and health. Findings include: 1.During an observation on 03/05/25 at 09:05 AM, the facility's laundry department revealed 1 commercial was not operational. During an interview on 03/05/2025 at 09:07AM, laundry Aide stated dryers and washer had been inoperable for about 3 weeks. Laundry Aide stated she was able to provide clean linens for the facility's residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable in that: -The facility failed to keep liquid medication bottle free from dried drippings in medication cart for 100 hall. This finding can lead to spills which obscure the label or cause the medication to be contaminated and affect the 26 residents that reside in 100 hall. Findings included Observation on 03/05/2025 at 11:30 AM of liquid medication bottle in medication cart for 100 Hall revealed red dried debris on opening of bottle. In an interview with ADON on 03/06/2025 at 01:56 PM revealed the medication aides and nurses are responsible for medication carts. She stated LVN F was also responsible for monitoring the facility's medication carts. ADON stated risks of oral medication bottles with debris around the opening include possible infection control issues as the debris…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 dumpster reviewed for food safety requirements. -Dumpster had trash on the ground outside and around the dumpster. -Dumpster was left open and with food substance running down the side of it. This failure could result in providing harborage and breeding areas for insects, rodents and other pests which could infest the facility placing the residents at risk of illnesses, and living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: Observation on 03/06/2025 at 11:20 AM revealed dumpster to be open, with food left outside on the ground and an orange, brown food substance dripping down the side of it. Interview on 03/06/2025 at 12:34 p.m. with the ADON/ infection control nurse, revealed she was aware when throwing trash away staff tied up trash bags and disposes of them in dumpster. She stated the risk of leaving the dumpster open with food laying on ground outside of the dumpster would be breeding ground for bacteria, staff could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #9, and Resident #10) of 10 resident reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment, in that: Resident #5's quarterly MDS did not accurately reflect the residents' oxygen therapy in the quarterly MDS assessment. Resident #9's quarterly MDS did not accurately reflect the residents' oxygen therapy in the in the quarterly MDS assessment. Resident #10's quarterly MDS did not accurately reflect the residents' oxygen therapy in the in the quarterly MDS assessment. This failure could affect residents at the facility who had been assessed for oxygen therapy use and could contribute to inadequate care. Findings included: Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 11/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Resident #5's profile picture had Resident #5 wearing his nasal cannula. Record review of Resident #5's facility history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #7) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #4's history of oxygen therapy. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #7's history of oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 11/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 5 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #9, and Resident #10) of 10 residents observed for oxygen management and 6 (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 15 rooms observed for oxygen sign postings, and 1 (Resident#5) of 5 residents reviewed for oxygen orders. Resident #3's oxygen tank was empty behind his wheelchair. Resident #4's oxygen tank behind her wheelchair in her room was empty. Resident #5's oxygen tank was on empty behind his wheelchair while he was in the dining area. Resident #9's oxygen tank was empty behind her wheelchair she was in the dining area. Resident #10's oxygen tank was empty behind her wheelchair in her room. Residents on oxygen in Rooms 207, 211, 215, 302, 303, 315, 316, did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) of 10 residents and 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 6 rooms reviewed for infection control. 1. Resident #3's nasal cannula was not stored in a zip lock bag and or baggy. 2. Resident #4's nasal cannula was not stored in a zip lock bag and or baggy. 3. Resident #5's nasal cannula was not stored in a zip lock bag and or baggy. room [ROOM NUMBER] in the restroom was a nasal cannula that was hanging in the shower area and not in zip lock bag and or baggy. These failures could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 11/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately notify and consult with the resident's physician and resident's representative when a significant change in a resident physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that was a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to immediately inform the NP/MD and the family (RP/POA) on 09/24/24 of Resident #2's change in condition addressing her fall on 09/24/24. This failure could place residents at risk of serious decrease in health related to delayed treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/05/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #2's facility history and physical dated 11/03/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Dementia and falls. Record review of Resident #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for one (Resident #10) of 3 residents reviewed for compliance with PASRR regulations. -The facility failed to submit and coordinate Resident #10's PASRR assessment and screening in the LTC Online Portal -The facility failed to refer Resident #10 for a PASRR evaluation based on mental disorder diagnoses including [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome (genetic disorder that causes obesity, intellectual disability, and shortness in height). This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #10's admission Record dated 08/14/2024, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture due to abnormal brain development, often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #10) of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: -The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #10's diagnosis of [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #10's admission Record dated 08/14/2024, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 (Residents #1, and #2) of 4 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #1, and #2 's call lights were within their reach. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:31 PM revealed, Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Review of the Hospital History & Physical dated 06/23/24 for Resident #1 revealed, Chief Complaint: Right Hip Fracture. [AGE] year-old-female with PMH (past medical history) of DM II (insulin dependent), recurrent UTI, dementia, hypertension was brought to our hospital due to fall. Patient had an accidental mechanical fall 2 days ago from her bed, when she rolled from her bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-27 · tag F0573 — patternLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow the resident to obtain a copy of the records upon request and upon two working days advance notice to the facility for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #5) whose records were reviewed in that: -The facility failed to provide Resident #5's legal representative copies of medical records after a request was submitted to the facility. - The facility failed to provide Resident #2's family member a copy of the EKG report. This failure could place residents at risk of violation of their rights by not receiving copies of their medical records. The findings were: Resident #5 Closed Record Review of admission Record dated 07/10/24 at 9:44 AM, for Resident #5 revealed an original admission date of 03/09/23. Responsible Party was listed as family member. Resident was transferred to the hospital via EMS on 04/28/24. Review of the Medical Visit dated 03/18/23 for Resident #5 revealed Reason for visit: Initial Visit. [AGE] year-old-female, transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for two (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of six residents reviewed for physician notification. -The facility failed to immediately consult with physician and/or Nurse Practitioner when the facility did not have 7 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics on hand to administer to Resident #2 according to physician's orders. -The facility failed to immediately consult with physician and/or Nurse Practitioner when the facility did not have 8 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics on hand to administer to Resident #3 according to physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk of delayed medical treatment. Findings include: Resident #2 Review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:30 PM revealed, Resident #2 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Review of the Annual History & Physical dated 08/01/23 for Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1, and Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's MDS accurately reflected resident had an Enteral Feeding. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident's #3's MDS accurately reflected resident had an infection to right knee. These failures could put residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services to prevent falls and injuries related to inaccurate MDS assessment. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:31 PM revealed, Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Record review of the Hospital History & Physical dated 06/23/24 for Resident #1 revealed, Chief Complaint: Right Hip Fracture. [AGE] year-old-female with PMH (past medical history) of DM II (insulin dependent), recurrent UTI, dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related conditions received care and services to meet the needs of the residents for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #6) 2 residents reviewed for PASRR services. -The facility failed to provide Specialized Services to Resident #4 as agreed to during the interdisciplinary meeting. -The facility failed to ensure that all PSCR benefits were being provided to Resident #6. The failures could affect residents who are PASRR positive by placing them at risk of not receiving needed PASRR services which could lead to a decline in health and well-being. Findings included: Resident #4 Review of the admission Record dated 07/09/24 for Resident #4 revealed original admission date 12/28/23; re-admission date 01/23/24. Review of a Medical Visit dated 01/02/24 for Resident #4 revealed, [AGE] year-old-female status post fracture right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 after she sustained a fall on 06/22/24 that addressed the resident's skin tear and fracture to her left wrist. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:31 PM revealed, Resident #2 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Review of the Hospital History & Physical dated 06/23/24 for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident observed for oxygen management. Resident #1 was on oxygen without a physician's order. This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health; and place them at risk of an unsafe environment which could lead to accidents and injuries. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:31 PM revealed, Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Record review of the Hospital History & Physical dated 06/23/24 for Resident #1 revealed, Chief Complaint: Right Hip Fracture. [AGE] year-old-female with PMH (past medical history) of DM II (insulin dependent), recurrent UTI, dementia, hypertension. Record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 6 reviewed for medication administration in that: -The facility failed to immediately consult with physician and/or Nurse Practitioner when the facility did not have 7 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics on hand to administer to Resident #2 according to physician's orders. -The facility failed to immediately consult with physician and/or Nurse Practitioner when the facility did not have 8 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics on hand to administer to Resident #3 according to physician's orders. This failure put residents at risk of delayed medical treatment. Findings include: Resident #2 Review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 revealed, Resident #2 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents, for 1 of 6 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for laboratory orders. -The facility failed to ensure that labs were done on a timely basis and lab results were promptly received to prevent delay in medical treatment for and for 8 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics on hand to administer to Resident #3 according to physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk for untreated medical conditions and diminished quality of care. Findings included: Resident #3 Closed Record review of the admission Record dated 07/09/24 for Resident #3 revealed, original admission date: 06/06/24. Resident discharged home on [DATE] with Home Health Services. Review of the Initial Medical Visit dated 06/10/24 for Resident #3 revealed, [AGE] year-old-female discharge from the hospital where she was treated for right knee septic arthritis (is a painful infection in a joint that can come from germs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 6 (Resident #1, and Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy and completeness of medical records. -The facility failed to document notification of change of condition for Resident #2 on 07/03/24. -The facility failed to ensure SBAR INTERACT Communication Form for Resident #1 did not have blanks in the documentation. -The facility failed to document in Event Report for Resident #1 injuries and mental status at time of incident on 06/22/24. -The facility failed to document an order for use of grab bars for Resident #1. -The facility failed to document for Resident #1 the type of pain and pain medication that was administered. -The facility failed to ensure Pain Evaluation dated 06/26/24 for Resident #1, was signed and dated. -The facility failed to ensure the Pain Evaluation dated 07/12/24 for Resident #1 did not have blanks in the documentation. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances to include all written grievance decisions include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed, any corrective action or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date when the decision was issued for 1 of 6 (Resident #3 ) reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to ensure prompt resolution when Resident #3 was not administered 8 doses of the prescribed IV antibiotics according to physician's orders. These failures could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: Resident #3 Closed Record review of the admission Record dated 07/09/24 for Resident #3 revealed, original admission date: 06/06/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be treated with dignity and respect, to include the right to be free from physical restraints for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to have medical symptoms for Resident #1 that warranted use of physical restraint; failed to have an order for use of Grab Bars on the bed; and failed to conduct on-going evaluation for use of restraint. Resident #1 sustained a fall on 06/22/24, left arm was caught between the mattress and the grab bar resulting in a left wrist fracture and contusion to right hip. This failure could place residents with restraints at risk of restricted movement, entrapment, decline in ADLs function, and psychological distress. The findings included: Review of the admission Record dated 07/08/24 at 5:31 PM revealed, Resident #1 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Review of the Hospital History & Physical dated 06/23/24 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 12 employees (the Administrator) reviewed for criminal background checks. The facility failed to run the Administrator's criminal background check prior to him starting his duties on 05/13/24. This failure could place residents at risk of potential abuse. Findings included: Interview and record review on 07/12/24 at 5:08 PM with the Administrator revealed his start date was 05/13/24. The Administrator informed surveyor facility did not have any documentation in his personal file that Criminal Check, Employee Misconduct Check and Nurse Aide Registry Check had been completed prior employment or on this first day of work. The Administrator reported that he had terminated the HR manager on 07/11/24 and would send him a text message to see if he would respond back to check if he had completed his criminal check prior to and/or on first day of employment. The Administrator stated, I have checked my personnel file several times and the HR Manager's office and did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-27 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from an enabler (bed rail) prior to installation or review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for enablers (bed rails/grab bars). On 06/22/24, Resident #1 fell out of bed at 12:31:04 AM - Resident #1 was noted to have an enabler (bed rail/grab bar) connected to the upper area of her bed. Resident #1's Enabler assessment dated [DATE], revealed, that it was incomplete. The digital form was not signed nor was there any input in the questions such as, Was there a risk to the resident if enablers are used? (all left blank). This failure could place residents who have grab bars (enablers) at risk of having inappropriate or unnecessary enablers in place, increasing their risk of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 07/08/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 5 (Resident # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) of 7 residents reviewed for wound treatment of wounds, 1. Resident #1 did not receive physician-ordered wound treatment on 6 occasions: for physician's order 04/09/2024 provision of care was not documented on 04/21/2024; for physician's order 04/09/2024 through 04/24/2024 provision of care was not documented on 04/14/2024, 04/20/2024, 04/21/2024, 04/24/2024; for physician's order dated 04/09/2024 through 04/19/2024 for provision of care was not documented on 04/19/2024. 2. Resident #2 did not receive physician-ordered wound treatment on 16 occasions: for physician's order dated 3/4/24 to 3/11/24 provision of care was not documented on 03/10/2024 or 03/11/1024: for physician's order dated 03/12/2024 to 4/8/2024 provision of care was not documented on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one of four medication carts (Medication Cart 100 Hall) and four Treatment Carts (Treatment Carts in 300 hall, facility rotunda, 200 hall, 100 hall) of five Treatment carts observed for being locked when staff were absent from the area. On 05/04/2024 the 300 hall Treatment cart was unlocked and unattended. On 05/04/2024 Rotunda Treatment Cart was unlocked and unattended. On 05/04/2024 The 200 Hall Treatment Cart was unlocked and unattended. On 05/04/2024 The 100 Hall Medication Cart was unlocked and unattended. On 05/04/2024 The 100 Hall Treatment Cart was unlocked and unattended. This failure put residents at risk of unauthorized and unsupervised access to medications and medical equipment. Findings included: Observation on 05/04/2024 at 12:03 PM in the 300 hall revealed a cart labeled Treatment. A lock for a key was observed to be protruding from the front of the cart. No staff were observed at or near the cart. Opening the top drawer of the cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility maintained medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for four (Residents #1, #3, #4 and #6) of seven residents reviewed for documentation of provision of assistance with bathing. The CNAs software for documentation of bathing assistance was incorrectly set up at admission/readmission for Residents #1, #3, #4 and #6 so there was no documentation showing bathing assistance had been provided. This failure put residents at risk of diminished self-image, poor self-hygiene, and impaired skin integrity as a result of undetected lapses in the provision of assistance with bathing. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/06/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's physician's admission note dated 04/08/2024 revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that it employed a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one social worker positions reviewed. The facility, which was licensed for 124 beds, failed to employ qualified social worker on a full-time basis since on 02/29/2024 This failure put facility residents at risk of not having their psychosocial or discharge planning needs met. Findings included: Record review of the facility census dated 05/07/2024 revealed that the facility had 124 beds. In an interview on 05/06/2024 at 1:44 PM the ADON revealed that the facility did not have a full-time social worker and that the person who currently occupied the social work office [Social Work Trainee] was not licensed. In an interview on 05/06/2024 at 2:38 PM the Social Work Trainee revealed that she had worked at the facility for about two months. She said she was working on completing her Bachelor of Social Work degree and was not yet licensed as a social worker. She said she was responsible for assessments of residents at admission and was helping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to complete Resident #1's baseline care plan until 04/09/2024 although he was admitted on [DATE]. This failure could put residents at risk of not having their care needs met. Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/06/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's physician's admission note dated 04/08/2024 revealed that resident had a history of diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure) and paraplegia (lower body paralysis). He had been in the hospital for surgeries for his right knee and for an infected pressure wound (injury to the skin from extended pressure) on the sacral area (tail bone). Record review of Resident #1's baseline care plan dated 04/09/2024 revealed he had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals and ensured that the discharge needs of each resident are identified and result in the development of a discharge plan for each resident for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for development of a discharge plan. The facility failed to develop a discharge plan for Resident #1 who was admitted on [DATE] until the day before he was discharged on 05/07/2024. This failure increased resident's risks for not having their care needs addressed after discharge. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/06/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's physician's admission note dated 04/08/2024 revealed that resident had a history of diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure) and paraplegia (lower body paralysis). He had been in the hospital for surgeries for his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #4 and #7) of seven reviewed for infection prevention and control. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #4's catheter tubing and catheter drainage bag was not touching the floor on 5/4/2024. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7's catheter tubing and catheter drainage bag was not touching the floor on 5/6/2024. This failure put residents at increased risk of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/07/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's Medical Visit doctor's note dated 04/25/2024 revealed he had a medical history that included a urinary tract infection, encephalopathy (disturbance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: - The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 that addressed antiplatelet platelet medication, feeding tube, restlessness when in bed, anti-anxiety medication, hematoma to right side of head, UTI, and pneumonia. - The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 that addressed restlessness while in bed and orders for anti-anxiety, hematoma to the right side of forehead, behaviors and risk for bruising r/t use of ASA 81 mg. -The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for neurological checks. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had neurological checks done after she was found with a hematoma (a pool of mostly clotted blood that forms in an organ, tissue, or body space) to right side of forehead on 04/17/23 on the morning shift. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had neurological checks done after she was found with a hematoma on the forehead on 04/05/23 on the morning shift. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had had neurological checks done after he was found on the floor on 02/03/24 and could not say what had happened and if he had hit his head. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of changes in condition due to not conducting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for physician notification. The physician/FNP were not notified that Resident #1 was restless on 04/16/24 on the night shift and was found with her face on the air mattress pump on the foot of the bed. This failure put residents at risk of delayed medical treatment. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 04/18/24 revealed Initial admit date : [DATE]. admission Date: 02/11/2024. admitted from the hospital. Review of Resident #1's History & Physical dated 01/23/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and anemia. The resident was cognitively impaired; alert and oriented x 0 (resident was not oriented to person, place, or time). Review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and to investigate any such allegations for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for implementation of written abuse, neglect, and exploitation policies: The facility failed to follow the facility policy on reporting allegations of all alleged violations to the Administrator, State agency and other officials in accordance with state law on and to investigate any such allegations on; -04/17/24 when Resident # 1 was found with a hematoma to right side of forehead of unknown origin. -04/05/24 when Resident # 2 was found with a hematoma to ghe forehead of unknown origin. This failure could place all residents at the facility at risk for abuse. Findings included: Review of facility's undated policy & procedure on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation provided by Administrator on 04/18/24 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations which involved abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 Residents (Residents #1, and #2) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff reported to the Administrator and or the state agency on 04/17/24 when Resident #1 was found with a hematoma (a pool of mostly clotted blood that forms in an organ, tissue, or body space) to the right side of her forehead and the cause of injury was unknown. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff reported to the Administrator and or the state agency on 04/05/24 when Resident #2 was found with a hematoma to her forehead and the cause of injury was unknown. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 4 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and injuries of unknown origin. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's and Resident #2's injuries of unknow origin were thoroughly investigated. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 04/18/24 revealed Initial admit date : [DATE]. admission Date: 02/11/2024. admitted from the hospital. Review of Resident #1's History & Physical dated 01/23/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and anemia. The resident was cognitively impaired; alert and oriented x 0 (resident was not oriented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Residents #1, and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's MDS accurately reflected resident's behaviors that put her at risk for falls. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident's #3's MDS accurately reflected resident had a history fo falls and use of anti-anxiety medication. These failures could put residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services to prevent falls and injuries related to inaccurate MDS assessment. Findings included: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 04/18/24 revealed Initial admit date : [DATE]. admission Date: 02/11/2024. admitted from the hospital. Review of Resident #1's History & Physical dated 01/23/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #6) of nine residents reviewed for accuracy of resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's MDS admission assessment accurately reflected the resident's history of falls. This failure put residents at increased risk of falling as a result of staff not being aware of their history of falling. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 3/26/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had admitting principal diagnoses of syncope and collapse (passing out and falling). Other diagnoses included muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, and difficulty in walking, Closed record review of Resident #6's hospital History and Physical dated 01/31/2024 revealed he had falling while in the hospital and had a history of his legs giving out. The hospital assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #9) of nine residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that an unlicensed staff member did not put a bandage on Resident #9's left forearm without prior assessment by a nurse or a physician's order. This failure could put residents at risk of unassessed wounds, undocumented treatment and undiagnosed infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 03/26/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #9's history and physical effective date 12/27/2023 for readmission of 02/03/2024 revealed he had diagnoses including diabetes, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). No problems with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 (Residents #3) of 4 residents reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #3's call light was within reach. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/07/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3 's most recent facility history and physical in the facility system dated 10/29/23, revealed, an [AGE] year-old diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease (condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), Dementia (loss of memory), Renal Cancer (a disease in which malignant (cancer) cells…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately notify and consult with the resident's physician when a significant change in a resident physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that was a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to immediately inform NP/MD on 02/12/24 of Resident #7's change in condition addressing her antibiotics that the facility did not have on hand and had to wait two days before the facility could administer her antibiotics. This failure could place residents at risk of serious decrease in health related to delayed treatment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 02/20/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7 's local hospital history and physical dated 02/05/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Dementia (loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for folowing physician orders. Resident #3 was not given wound care as prescribed by physician orders. This failure could affect others by placing them at risk of potential medical complications related to changes in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/07/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's most recent facility history and physical in the facility system dated 10/29/23, revealed, an [AGE] year-old diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease (condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), Dementia (loss of memory), Renal Cancer (a disease in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent worsening of pressure injuries for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide and assess care for Resident #3's facility acquired pressure ulcers to the left elbow in which the same Q-tip was used for two wounds in cross contaimation and to the right outer heel with pulling off the dressing without soaking to the dressing to prevent injury to Resident #3. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for worsening pressure injuries, pain, and a decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/07/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's most recent facility history and physical in the facility system dated 10/29/23, revealed, an [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #7) of 4 reviewed for medication administration in that: Resident #7 was not given her antibiotics according to physician's orders four times a day every day for 02/13/24, 02/14/24, and on 02/18/24, two doses at 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM . This deficient practice could result in a decline in health due to incorrect medication administration and inaccurate count of controlled medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 02/20/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7 's local hospital history and physical dated 02/05/24, revealed, an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Dementia (loss of memory) and Rheumatoid arthritis was a chronic (long-lasting) autoimmune disease that mostly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. The Assistant Wound Care Nurse failed to ensure Resident #3's treatment administration record accurately documented treatment for the Resident #3's wound care according to physician's orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/07/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 10/27/23 , revealed, was on hemo-dialysis due to renal failure. Check and change dressing daily at access site. Monitor/document for peripheral edema, bleeding. At risk for pressure ulcers. Monitor skin for changes of redness, circulatory problem, breakdown and report to medical doctor and representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control in that: Wound Care Nurse used the same Q-tip dipped in Med-honey to apply to two different pressure ulcers on Resident #3. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings Resident #3 Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/07/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3 's most recent facility history and physical in the facility system dated 10/29/23, revealed, an [AGE] year-old diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease (condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Resident #15, Resident #23, and Resident #54) of 28 residents reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #15 that reflected the physician ' s order for continuous tube feeding. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #23 that reflected the resident ' s diagnosis of dysphagia. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #54 that addressed the resident ' s renal dialysis, or his behaviors related to bowel movements. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 2 (Resident #27 and Resident #20) of 2 residents reviewed for Midline/PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #27's and Resident #20's midline dressing was changed according to doctor's order. This failure placed residents at risk of developing an infection. Findings included: Resdient #27 Record review of Consolidated Physician Orders dated 01/10/2024 indicated Resident #27, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses which included essential (primary) hypertension, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Record review of the MDS with a completed date of 09/07/2023 indicated Resident #27's cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of one (Resident #105) of five residents reviewed for accurate administering of drugs. The facility failed to obtain physician-ordered medication for sleep apnea (Modafinil) for Resident #105 from admission until 01/11/2024. This failure placed residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes and a decline in health due to not receiving medication for sleep apnea as ordered. Findings included: Record review of Resident #105 ' s face sheet dated 01/10/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #105 ' s History and Physical dated 11/07/2023 revealed he had diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), chronic hypoxic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the blood) and morbid obesity. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 (Resident #24) of 6 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #24 did not receive antipsychotics (Seroquel/quetiapine and Risperdal/risperidone) that were not necessary to treat a specific condition. These failures could put residents at risk of side effects from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24 ' s face sheet dated 01/10/2024 revealed she was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #24 ' s hospital Physician ' s Report dated 12/08/2023 revealed that the resident had medical history including dementia and was taking 25 MG of Quetiapine at bedtime. While at the hospital she was diagnosed with delirium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for two (lunch) of two meals reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the mechanical soft lunch meals were prepared to the desired consistency. This placed residents who received mechanical soft meals from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, poor intake, choking, and aspiration. The findings included: Review of Resident #23's admission Record, dated 01/11/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 02/17/21 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke caused by disrupted blood supply and restricted oxygen supply in the brain), facial weakness following cerebral infarction, and dysphagia - oropharyngeal phase (difficulty initiating swallowing). Review of Resident #23's Speech Therapy Plan of Care, dated 02/18/21, revealed a current level of function of patient presents with marked left sided labial weakness, evident in retraction (meaning a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide snacks at times outside of the scheduled meal service times and consistent with the plan of care for 1 of 39 residents reviewed for bedtime snacks. (Resident #27) The facility did not provide Resident #27 with a bedtime snack. The facility failure could place residents who received ordered bedtime snacks at risk of low blood sugar, experiencing hunger in the evening hours, weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Consolidated Physician Orders dated 01/10/2024 indicated Resident #27, admitted [DATE], was [AGE] years old with diagnoses which included essential (primary) hypertension, chronic kidney disease, morbid obesity, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications. Review of the most recent MDS signed date of 09/07/2023 indicated Resident #27' ' s cognition was intact. The resident had clear speech, was understood, and could usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 5 of 6 unidentified residents observed during glucose checks , 1 (yellow bin) of 2 yellow bins, and 1 (laundry cart cover) of 1 laundry cart reviewed for infection control in that: 1. Failed to disinfect the glucometer between residents. 2. 1 yellow bin had its lid off exposing the linen. 3. 1 laundry cover had holes and was coming apart. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings include: An observation on 01/09/24 at 11:30 PM, LVN K checked five resident's blood glucose without cleaning or disinfecting the glucometer between each resident. Observed LVN K after each glucose check to gather the testing used strip, used alcohol wipe, used lancet in her palm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 (Residents #98, #101, and #431) of 10 residents reviewed for call light button placement. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #98, #101, and #431 ' s call lights were within their reach. This failure put residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Resident #98 Record review of Resident #98 ' s admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). He had no symptomatic behaviors. He had impaired range of motion in both arms. He required substantial assistance from one person to use the toilet and to bathe. He had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. He had no history of falls. In an observation and interview on 01/09/2024 at 11:26 AM, Resident #98 revealed staff were slow to respond to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged abuse violations are throroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #18) of 23 residents reviewed for employee treatment of residents. The facility failed to interview CNA P who had provided services to Resident #18 at the time abuse was alleged. This failure could put residents at increased risk of abuse or neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #18 ' s face sheet dated 01/02/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #18 ' s annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 10 (Moderate cognitive impairment. He had no symptoms of delirium or psychosis. He rejected evaluation or care 4 to 6 of the days during the 7-say look-back period. He used a wheelchair and was dependent on staff members to feed him, provide oral care, for toileting and bathing, to dress and for personal hygiene. He was dependent on staff to move around in bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours (about 2 days) of a resident's admission for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #57 and Resident #428) reviewed for baseline care plan. Resident #57 did not have a baseline care plan that addressed her focus areas of needed care. Resident #428 baseline care plan address her focused area of diabetes care. This failure could have placed newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving the care and services and continuity of care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet dated 01/10/24 revealed admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #57's facility physical and history dated 12/14/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pnecessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #20 . This deficient practice placed residents at risk of poor foot hygiene and decline in residents' physical condition. Findings include: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 01/10/24 revealed admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Alzheimer's Disease. Record review of Resident #20's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed an independent cognition to be able to make daily decisions BIMS (an assessment used to monitor cognition) score of 15. Resident #20 was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer disease. Record review of Resident #20's care plan dated 01/09/24 revealed risk of infections due to history of diabetes mellitus. Podiatrists consult as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical conditions and if necessary, assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person, and arranging for transportation to and from such appointments for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #431) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide access to a podiatrist for Resident #431. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of poor foot hygiene and decline in residents' physical condition. Findings include: Record review of Resident #431's face sheet dated 01/1/24 revealed admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #431's facility history and physical dated 12/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral vascular disease (the reduced circulation of blood to a body part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 7 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and security. Medication Cart #1. Facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was secured when it was left unattended. These failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. Findings included: Observation on 01/09/24 at 12:50 PM of Medication Cart #1 unlocked and unattended with no staff present from 12:50 -12:52. LVN K locked cart after receiving medication from cart for a resident. There were no residents present near the medication cart during this time. Observation on 01/10/24 at 03:30 PM, Medication Cart #1 at end of hall 100 to be unlocked with no staff present. Medication cart #1 remained unlocked from 3:30 pm until 3:58 pm, 1 resident rolled past cart to her room. LVN L placed gloves into top of cart then locked cart. Interview on 01/10/24 at 04:02 PM, LVN L stated there is one set of keys per hall with three of the four halls having two medication carts.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to safeguard medical records against loss, destruction, or unauthorized use for 1 (medical records black box) of 1 reviewed for medical records. The facility medical records black box had resident information coming out of its slit opening exposing resident information to the public. This failure could place residents at risk of having their personal information exposed to everyone. Findings include: Observation and interview on 01/09/24 at 12:50 PM with the ADON C. The medical records black was hanging off the wall next to the door of the medical records office. Residents paper works were sticking out of the slit of the medical records black box underneath the slit was a posting sign stating in big red bold letters, - If full do not continue to shove papers inside!! The ADON C stated having resident papers sticking out of the medical records black box was inappropriate. ADON C stated the medical records black box contained resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed an adequately equipped system allowed residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system for 1 (Resident #227) of 10 residents reviewed for call light button placement. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #227 ' s call light was functioning properly. This failure put residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #227 ' s face sheet dated 01/12/2024 revealed she was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #227 ' s admission Note dated 01/02/2023 revealed she had diagnoses including dementia, left hip surgery, urinary tract infection. She had memory deficits and was on fall precautions, Record review of Resident #227 ' s baseline care plan dated 01/10/2024 revealed she needed extensive assistance from one person to bathe, for toileting and for walking. She required limited assistance from one person to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for professional standards for food service safety. -1 bag of fish fillets found in freezer opened to air and outside of its original package without a label of its contents. -1 bag of garlic bread found in freezer removed from the original package that was without a label of its contents. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation and interview on 11/29/2023 at 11:10 a.m., of the walk-in freezer revealed a bag of 14 fillets opened to air and without a label of its contents. The Dietary Manager (DM) identified the fillets to be fish fillets. The DM said the bag should have been labeled with contents and sealed. Observation and interview on 11/29/2023 at 11:10 a.m., of walk-in freezer revealed a clear bag of garlic bread out of its original package and not labeled. The DM said the garlic bread should have been labeled when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an MDS assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate assessments in that: -The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #1's active diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and oxygen therapy on the Quarterly MDS assessment. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive MDS assessments and could cause residents not to receive correct care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/01/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female, with admission date of 03/22/2022. The resident had diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, muscle wasting, anemia, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, retention of urine, and adult failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #1's History and Physical dated 04/04/2023, reflected the History of Present Illness indicated in part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #8) reviewed for respiratory care in that: -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #8's humidifier for her oxygen concentrator had water. This deficient practice could affect residents who received oxygen therapy and could result in residents receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and could result in a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/06/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No diagnosis noted on the face sheet. Record review of Resident #8's initial MDS (in progress) dated 09/06/2023, Section C. revealed Resident #8 BIMS score of 0 indicating the resident was severely impaired cognitively. Section G. revealed Resident #8 required extensive assistance with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for infection control, in that, -The facility failed to ensure that staff sanitized a nasal cannula that was observed on the floor before placing the nasal cannula back on the resident. -The facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene and don gloves when in contact with Resident #8's oxygen equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents in the facility by placing them at risk of contracting, spreading and/or exposing them to pathogens that could lead to the spread of communicable diseases. The findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/06/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$192,681 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $16,153 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
- $155,988 — penalty dated 2024-11-08
- $20,540 — penalty dated 2024-07-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7441 PASEO DEL NORTE PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/15/2024 |
| 7441 PASEO DEL NORTE OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2025 |
| SQUARE, JAIME | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/24/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/24/2025 |
| WELCH, KENNETH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.