No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Enchanted Rock

210 West Windcrest St, Fredericksburg, TX 78624 · Government - Hospital district · 120 certified beds · (830) 637-7885 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0607, F0610) — most recent May 20265 immediate-jeopardy citations$63,121 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0607, F0610) — most recent May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $63,121 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-19)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
204 W Windcrest St · (830) 997-4043 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
205 W Windcrest St · (830) 997-2163 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
H-E-B0.6 mi
407 S Adams St · (830) 997-9950 · Call to confirm hours
Park
412 S Lincoln St · (830) 997-4202 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.6%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.4%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.3%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.6%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.1%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission38.8%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.012.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.662.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 161 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 106% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.7%CMS range 51.0–63.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 7.3–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.44
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
78.9%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-02)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to prevent Resident #44 from going out a window without staff awareness. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of other resident elopements and harm the resident with injury or death. The findings include:Record review of Resident #44's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dementia, muscle weakness, cognitive communications deficit, partial legal blindness, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 of 26 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for accidents and hazards supervision, in that: 1. Resident #1 was found in in another town about an hour's drive from the facility. 2. Resident #2 was spotted going down looking (sic) at cars outside of the facility and had not been supervised the whole time she was outside of the facility. There were no assessments (to include skin assessments) done for Resident #2. 3. Resident #3 eloped and was found walking down the street. Resident #3 had a wander guard but nursing staff did not hear any door alarm with this exit. An IJ was identified on 01/16/25 at 04:45 PM, The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 05:45 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/19/25 at 01:06 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of a pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: The facility failed to implement their policy to report and investigate Resident #21's 11/21/23 fall with a serious injury, per [state agency] guideline. The Administrator, DON, and LVN D did not report Resident #21's fall with a fracture to the state agency. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/12/2024 at 07:14 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/13/2024 at 06:25 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. This deficiency could have placed resident at risk for harm by abuse, neglect, and or mistreatment, contributing to further serious injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet, dated 1/12/24, revealed an admission date of 11/11/23 with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on nterview and record review the facility failed to immediately investigate, protect the resident, and report allegations of neglect when: Resident #21 had an unwitnessed fall with a serious injury on 11/21/23, per [state agency] guideline. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/12/2024 at 07:14 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/13/2024 at 06:25 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility ' s need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. This deficiency could have placed resident at risk for harm by abuse, neglect, and or mistreatment, contributing to further serious injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet, dated 1/12/24, revealed an admission date of 11/11/23 with diagnoses which included fracture of .part of neck of left femur (thigh bone), lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities), muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of residents, the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for quality of care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 received appropriate assessments and interventions due to being at high risk for falls. The facility failed to develop Resident #21's care plan to address interventions for risk of falls. Resident #21 had a fall on 11/21/2023 which resulted in an emergency hospitalization for a hip fracture and was admitted to the facility without any interventions for Resident #21's high fall risk. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/12/2024 at 07:14 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/13/2024 at 06:25 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with actual harm that is not immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration of medications for 1 of 6 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident # 1) LVN B administered an incorrect dose of Xanax to Resident #1. This failure could place the 6 residents who received medications administered by LVN B at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6/22/2026 indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], and her diagnoses included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by poor blood flow), Alzheimer's disease (progressive brain disorder), anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent uncontrollable fear or worry) and osteoarthritis (cartilage wears down over time).Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/14/2026, showed a BIMS score of 3 which indicted severe cognitive impairment.Record review of the care plan indicated The resident is on hypnotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accuracy of records: Nursing staff failed to document medication administration in the MAR for Resident #1 on 05/10/2026. The failure could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place the residents at risk of errors in care and treatment.The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/13/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, subsequent encounter (break in the bone surrounding a hip implant). Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's order summary dated 05/13/2026 reflected the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident's rights that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and ensure the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #42, #22 and #4) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #42's verbal suicide discussion with her caregiver. 2. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #22's discharge plans. 3. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #4's discharge plans. These failures could place residents at risk of staff not being aware of resident care plans and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #52) reviewed for quality of care.1. Resident #27 was readmitted with a cervical collar (a neck brace, a medical device used to support, stabilize, and immobilize the neck and cervical spine after injury or surgery) and did not have orders to manage or maintain the cervical collar for 40 days.2. Resident #52 was admitted with a cervical collar and did not have orders to manage or maintain the cervical collar for 6 days.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care, harm, or injuries.The findings include:1. Record review of Resident #27's admission record dated 04/17/2026 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was discharge to the hospital on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered professional nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for registered nurse (RN) services. The facility failed to have an RN on 11 dates during the period reviewed 11/1/2025 through 4/15/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the services of an RN.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, except when waived, the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for registered nurse (RN) services. The facility failed to have an RN on 11 dates during the period reviewed from 11/1/2025 through 4/15/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the services of an RN. The findings include: A record review of the facility's RN timecards for the period dated 11/1/2025 through 4/15/2026 revealed 11 dates with no RN coverage. The review revealed the following dates without the services of an RN: 11/15/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours, if the events that caused the allegation did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency that Resident #44 went out a window without staff awareness. This deficient practice could place residents at risk by not reporting hazards and can affect residents' safety. The findings include:Record review of Resident #44's admission Record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment must have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to investigate that Resident #44 went out a window without staff awareness. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm and other resident elopements. The findings include:Record review of Resident #44's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dementia, muscle weakness, cognitive communications deficit, partial legal blindness, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #44's March 2026 consolidated orders and MAR was documented for visual checks on resident #44's wander guard every 2 hours start date of 5/7/2025. Record Review of Consolidated orders for April 2026 was documented every 2-hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for urinary retention (the inability to fully empty the bladder, resulting in urine being held back even when the bladder feels full. It can be a sudden, painful, and dangerous inability to urinate requiring emergency care or a long-term condition with difficulty urinating or a weak stream.) Resident #55 had a need for straight in / out urinary catheterization (a flexible tube designed to drain urine from the bladder, which is inserted and removed immediately after the bladder is empty) 4 times a day and LVN Z performed the procedure late by 1 1/2 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary retention, pain, and / or infection.Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that its Residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for significant medication errors. On 4/15/2026 LVN G administered Resident #22's insulin, via an injection pen, and did not follow the manufactures' administration instructions. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that its residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for significant medication errors. On 4/15/2026 LVN G administered Resident #22's insulin, via an injection pen, and did not follow the manufactures' administration instructions. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.Findings included: A record review of Resident #22's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure- Food safety requirements. The facility must store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 (1 kitchen) in that: The nourishment room, in hall 100, had 2 food items that were open and not dated. This could affect all residents that keep food in the nutrition room and could result in food borne illness The Findings:Observations on 4/15/2026 at 8:49 AM in the 100 hall nourishment room, in the refrigerator had a weenie wrap that was opened with no date. The 2nd food item in the refrigerator had a chicken express box that was opened, with no date. This contained 2 small containers of eaten mashed potatoes, and 1 piece of chicken that was eaten. During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 8:33 AM with the MDS nurse confirmed the weenie wrap that was open with no date and the chicken express box that was opened, with no date. Interview on 4/15/2026 4:47 PM with ADM stated the food was removed from the refrigerator. The ADM stated this could cause a food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for accurate records. LVN Z inaccurately documented care for Resident #55. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate records.Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for medical records. LVN Z inaccurately documented care for Resident #55. This failure could place residents at risk for their needs not being met accurately.Findings included: A record review of Resident #55's admission record, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #26 and #27) reviewed for infection prevention measures. RN BB assessed Residents #26's blood sugar with a glucometer (a portable device used to measure blood sugar levels; A drop of blood obtained via a lancing device is placed on the edge of the strip which was inserted into the meter) and did not disinfect the glucometer with an appropriate blood borne pathogen (germs or infectious agents and include viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites) disinfectant; and then proceeded to assess Resident #27's blood sugar with the same glucometer used for Resident #26. This failure could place residents at risk for blood borne pathogen infections.Based on observations, and record reviews, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1. #2 and #3) reviewed for infection control in that: The facility failed to ensure the Activity Director utilized hand hygiene during meal service between resident contact for Residents #1, #2 and #3. This deficient practice could affect all residents and place them at risk for infection. The findings were:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/08/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: moderate dementia with mood disturbance (a person with dementia who also experiences depression, anxiety and aggression), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neurological complication (diabetes that also affects the nervous system) and generalized muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) PASSAR services in that: The facility failed to submit a complete and accurate request for nursing facilityspecialized services in the LTC Online Portal within 20 business days after the date of IDT meeting.This failure could affect residents on PASARR services and could result in Resident not proving PASARR services.The findings: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 07/09/2025 documented he was admitted on [DATE], re-admitted on -2/04/2024 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, and Intellectual Disabilities. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented his BIMs score was 5/15 (severely impaired), mobilized with wheelchair and had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, and Intellectual Disabilities.Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a process which provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each Resident, for 2 of 6 residents (resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for procedures for accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs, in that: 1. The facility had Resident #1's controlled medications unsecured, 3 loose, 0.25mg pills of clonazepam stored in the ADON's desk drawer separated from the narcotic count sheet. 2. The facility had Resident #2's controlled medications unsecured, a bottle of liquid Dilauded, loose in a narcotic drawer separated from the narcotic count sheet. These failures could place residents at risk for safety from medication errors. The findings included: 1 a record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 7/8/2025, revealed an admission date of 8/17/2024 with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of a resident's admission, including initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, and social services for 3 of 8 (Resident #21, Resident #51 and Resident #207) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours from admission for Resident #21, Resident #51 and Resident #207. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 02/10/2025, revealed Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified cirrhosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #207) who were observed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for Resident #207. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of keeping them from calling for help as needed. The findings were: Record review of Resident #207's face sheet, dated 02/12/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: fracture of other parts of pelvis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, wedge compression fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, muscle weakness (generalized), unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. Record review of Resident #207's admission MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to formulate an advance directive and determine the choice to receive or not receive CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #46) whose records were reviewed for code status. The facility failed to obtain a DNR order and complete a care plan for Resident #46 after the completion of the Texas OOHDNR dated [DATE]. This deficient practice could affect any resident who requested a DNR code status and could result in staff providing CPR for a resident who did not wish to be resuscitated. The findings were: Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted on [DATE] wit diagnoses which included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right non-dominant side, nontraumatic acute subdural hemorrhage, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident in which Resident #2 alleged that CNA J told her that her butt was too big. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 2/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident with an initial admission date of 01/29/2018, with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (A disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves), and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/27/2024, reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were investigated for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident in which Resident #2 alleged that CNA J told her that her behind was too large. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 2/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident with an initial admission date of 01/29/2018, with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (A disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves), and major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/27/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS of 14, reflecting the resident had intact cognition. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capacity including the resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #44) reviewed for assessments. Resident #44's Quarterly MDS Assessment did not reflect his diagnosis of depression. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the care and services as needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 02/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Depression was not listed as a diagnosis on Resident #44's face sheet. Record review of Resident #44's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected under Section I - Active Diagnosis, subsection Psychiatric/Mood Disorder reflected that Resident #44 only had anxiety disorder and did not include depression. Record review of Resident #44's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, and services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #8 and #46) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's care plan reflected that the resident was a DNR. 2. Resident #8 was prescribed a thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthoses (TLSO) back brace, to be worn daily and it was not reflected in the care plan. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings were: 1 Record review of Resident #46's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: hemiplegia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #2, and #6) reviewed for significant medication errors. 1. On 2/10/2025 at 1:37 PM, LVN O administered Resident #2's Baclofen late by 32 minutes. 2. On 2/10/2025 LVN O administered Resident #6's: a. Hydrocodone at 12:10 PM; late by 3 hours and 10 minutes. b. Cipro at 12:10 PM; late by 2 hours and 10 minutes. c. Hydrocodone at 2:10 PM; late by 1 hour and 25 minutes These deficient practices placed residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications. The findings included: A record review of Resident #2's admission record revealed 9/22/2023 with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves. Multiple sclerosis can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms. It's also known as MS), stiffness of right, left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, which must include, at a minimum, standard and transmission-based precautions to be followed to prevent spread of infections, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #23) for infection control and prevention. On 2/12/2025, CNA L provided catheter care for Resident #23 without donning Enhanced Barrier Precautions Personal Protection Equipment (EBP PPE). This failure could place residents at risk for harm by cross-contamination. The findings included: A record review of Resident #23's admission record dated 2/12/2025 revealed an admission date of 2/4/2024 with diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (non-cancer tumors of the urinary tract), retention of urine, and obstructive and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including the right to refuse treatment for 16 of 26 residents (Residents #11-#26) reviewed for care plans, in that. Resident #11 through Resident #26 were at high risk for elopement after completing their respective Elopement Risk Assessment and their care plans were not updated to reflect this finding per facility policy and interviews. This failure could affect residents who have care areas not addressed by the care plans by not having their needs met and putting them at risk of not receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 2 (Resident #1 and #2) of 26 residents reviewed for reporting of alleged violations, in that: The facility failed to report to the state agency: 1. an elopement incident regarding Resident #1, after he had taken a car that did not belong to him from the nursing home parking lot and drove to a town over 60 miles away . 2. an incident involving a missing resident (Resident #2). This failure could place facility residents at risk of harm due to delays in reporting allegations of abuse and neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 01/15/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with admission date 08/31/24 and discharge date [DATE]. It reflected Resident #1 had diagnoses to include alcohol abuse with intoxication delirium (a mental state in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for falls. Nursing staff failed to ensure both brakes on Resident #1's wheelchair were locked while not in use and that Resident #1's call light was in place per Resident #1's Care Plan. These deficient practices could affect any resident at risk for falls and could contribute to a decline in resident's physical health. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, undated, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, unspecified lack of coordination and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 6/12/24, revealed her BIMS was 5 of 15 reflecting severe cognitive impairment; she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident could receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and did not pose a safety risk and received housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 3 of 48 residents (Resident #29, #58, and #36) and 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for a safe, clean, homelike environment, in that: 1.The facility failed to maintain Resident #36's room, a Resident with legal blindness, in a safe, clean, well - lit and, homelike environment. 2.The facility failed to ensure the 100 / 200-hall shower room had a functioning heater. 3. The facility failed to appropriately store an oxygen cylinder which was covered with towels in Resident 58's room. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58's room fan was free from dust for Resident #58, who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [a group of diseases that cause airflow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, in that: Resident #21's care plan did not address that the resident was at the high risk for falls. This deficient practice could result in a loss of quality of life due to residents receiving improper care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #21's admission record, dated 1/12/24, revealed an admission date of 11/11/23 with diagnoses which included fracture of .part of neck of left femur (thigh bone), lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities), muscle weakness, osteoporosis (bone strength weakens and is susceptible to fracture), arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints), and abnormalities with gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #21's MDS admission assessment, dated 11/14/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary 1 of 24 residents (Resident #16), reviewed for care plan revisions, in that: Resident #16 had healed pressure areas that were not being marked as resolved in her care plans. These failures could place residents at risk for lack of coordination of services. These findings were: Record review of Resident #16's admission Record, dated 01/13/24, revealed an admission date of 12/06/23 with diagnoses which included fracture of right lower leg and unspecified fall. Record review of Resident #16's MDS comprehensive assessment, dated 12/11/23, revealed Resident #16 had a BIMS score of 15/15, which indicated intact cognition. It also revealed that Resident #16 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. Resident #16 had no unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of Resident #16's care plan revealed Resident #16 had the following, initiated and revised 01/08/24: Problem: The resident has pressure injuries: DTI right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 12%, based on three errors out of 25 opportunities which involved 3 of 6 residents (Resident #53, #63, and #70) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication errors . 1. LVN J failed to administer Resident #53's 8:00 AM scheduled dose of intravenous (in the vein) cefazolin (an antibiotic - works by killing bacteria or preventing their growth). 2. Medication Aide CC failed to administer Resident #70's 7:00 AM metformin (a diabetes control medication) timely, according to physician orders and instead administered the medication at 9:10 AM. 3. Medication Aide CC failed to administer Resident #63's 7:00 AM omeprazole (a medication which decreases the amount of acid produced by the stomach) timely, according to physician orders and instead administered the medication at 9:00 AM. These deficient practices could place residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Residents are free of any significant medication errors, for 5 of 24 residents (Residents #7, #27, #43, #52 and #225) reviewed for significant medication errors, in that: 1. Medication Aide DD administered late medications to: a. Resident #7 was ordered Acetaminophen 325mg [pain reliever] and duloxetine 60mg [an antidepressant] to be administered twice a day with the first dose administered at 09:00 AM and was administered at 10:35 AM. b. Resident #27 was ordered pilocarpine ophthalmic solution [eye drops] and dorzolamide - timolol ophthalmic solution [eye drops] for glaucoma [a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye called the optic nerve] twice a day, anytime from 06:00 AM to 10:00 AM with the first dose administered at 11:05 AM. c. Resident #43 was ordered sacubitril - valsartan 24mg-26mg [used to treat patients whose heart cannot pump a normal amount of blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store and label Drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date, for 1 of 4 medication carts, reviewed for insulin injection pens. The facility failed to label Resident #15's insulin injection pen with the dates to identify when the insulin injection pen was taken out of refrigeration storage and the date to indicate when the insulin injection pen should be discarded. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by receiving ineffective insulin therapy. The findings included: A record review of Resident #15's admission record dated 01/12/2024 revealed an admission date of 02/24/2022 with diagnoses which included type 1 diabetes [a chronic condition in which the pancreas produces little or no insulin]. A record review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: The facility failed to ensure that sanitizing buckets were not near containers of food. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation, during the initial kitchen tour, on 01/09/24 starting at 09:38 AM, revealed there was 1 sanitizing bucket next to a tray of several plastic wrapped, clear plastic bowls of dry cereal, prepared 12/03/23. The exact number of bowls of dry cereal was unknown. The FNS director instructed FNS Dietary Aide Z to throw the dry cereal away because they were near the sanitizing bucket. During an interview on 01/11/24 at 09:03 AM, the FNS Director revealed that FNS Dietary Aide Z was sanitizing a cart after food service. The sanitizing bucket was being used by FNS Dietary Aide Z and she placed it on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, for 3 of 70 Residents (Resident #1 #41 and Resident #226) reviewed for the ability to call for staff, in that: The facility failed to provide Residents #1, #41 and #226 functioning nurse call light systems. This failure could place residents at risk for injury and diminished self-esteem, due to the inability to call for assistance. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/13/24, revealed the [AGE] year old resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease late onset (a common form of dementia that begins after age [AGE] with progressive memory loss), type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was an accident, and it had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 24 Residents (Resident #21) whose records were reviewed for accidents, in that: LVN D failed to notify Resident #21's physician when the resident had a fall on 11/21/23. This failure could contribute to residents not receiving the medical care and treatment needed and a decline in physical condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet, dated 1/12/24, revealed an admission date of 11/11/23 with diagnoses which included fracture of .part of neck of left femur (thigh bone), lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life and activities), muscle weakness, osteoporosis (bone strength weakens and is susceptible to fracture), arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to voice grievances to the facility or other agencies or entities that heard grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for grievances, in that; 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA X, LVN J, and ADON E initiated a grievance report on behalf of Resident #22 when the Resident reported a grievance to CNA X. This failure could place residents at risk by denying their right to make and have grievances heard and contributed to feelings of not being heard and unresolved issues. The findings included: A record review of Resident #22's admission record dated 01/12/2024 revealed an admission date of 09/21/2023 with diagnoses which included a non-ruptured cerebral aneurysm [a ballooning arising from a weakened area in the wall of a blood vessel in the brain]. A record review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: LVN D did not report Resident #21's fall immediately to the DON and the Administrator. The Administrator, DON, and LVN D did not report Resident #21's fall with a fracture to the state agency. This deficiency could have placed resident at risk for harm by abuse, neglect, and or mistreatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #21's Face Sheet, dated 1/12/24, revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for prevention of pressure ulcers, in that: The facility failed to follow physicians' orders for Resident #8's ordered pressure ulcer preventions. This failure could place residents at risk for pressure ulcer development. The findings included: A record review of Resident #8's admission record dated 01/11/2024 revealed an admission date of 09/06/2021 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment]. A record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was an 86-yr-old female admitted for long term care and assessed with a BIMS score of 0 out of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for respiratory care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #58's oxygen tank was stored and handled properly. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for danger, including decline in health. The findings included: A record review of Resident #58's admission record dated 01/10/2024, revealed an admission date of 12/13/2023 with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia [serious condition that causes fluid to build up in your lungs with low level of oxygen in your blood], asthma [condition in which your airways narrow and swell and may produce extra mucus, which can make breathing difficulty and trigger coughing], obstructive sleep apnea…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure standard and transmission-based precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infections to include hand hygiene procedures were followed by staff involved in direct resident contact, for 2 of 24 residents (Residents #53 and #38) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. LVN J did not perform hand hygiene in between, dirty to clean and in between glove changes while preparing and administering Resident #53's intravenous antibiotic medication. 2. CNA GG did not perform hand hygiene in between glove changes while performing suprapubic catheter care for Resident #38. These failures could place residents at risk for contracting and spreading infectious diseases. The findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months, or as required by State law, whichever is greater for 1 of 1 facility in that:The facility failed to post the Nursing Staff posting and have retention for 18 months. This failure could affect all residents and could result in resident not being aware of which staff were working for the day or not being aware of the census for the day.The Finding: Observation on 7/8/2025 at 10:00 AM while walking halls, there was no observation of the nurse staff posting posted. Observation on 7/9/2025 at 10:50 AM while walking halls, there was no observation of the nurse staff posting posted. Observation on 7/9/2025 at 5:00pm while walking halls, there was no observation of the nurse staff posting posted. Observation on 7/9/2025 at 5:01 PM revealed the Direct Care Daily Staffing, dated March 14, 2025, was sitting under the Receptionist counter. Interview on 7/9/2025 at 5:00pm with the ADM and Receptionist, responsible for posting the Nurse staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-01-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that recipes were followed for 2 of 2 pureed food side items for 1/11/24 lunch, in that: 1.The facility failed to ensure that the recipes for Cabbage Cooked Pureed Thick and Beans Baked (no bacon) Pureed Thick, were being followed. These failures could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record Review of the facility's Cabbage Cooked Pureed Thick recipe, dated 1/10/24, revealed that for 25 servings, the ingredients included: 3 Quart ½ Cup Cooked Cabbage, ½ Cup 2 Tablespoon Melted Margarine, and 3 ¼ cup Food Thickener. The directions included: step 3. Add a thickener. Process briefly until mixed, scraping sides of bowl. Record Review of the facility's Beans Baked (no bacon) Pureed Thick recipe, dated 1/10/24, revealed that for 25 servings, the ingredients included: 25 #8 scoop Beans Baked (no bacon), ½ Cup 2 Tablespoon Margarine, and 1 ¼ cup Hot Water, 1 ¼ Teaspoon Vegetable Base w/No Added MSG, and 3 1/3 Tablespoon Food Thickener.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$63,121 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $49,205 — penalty dated 2025-01-19
  • $13,916 — penalty dated 2024-01-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
APOLINAR, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/23/2015
210 WEST WINDCREST STREET OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
PADILLA, ADRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2025
HERREN, RICHARDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 17%Other / private 42%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,437per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$383per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455941. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next