Avir at Fredericksburg
1117 S. Adams St., Fredericksburg, TX 78624 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (830) 997-4364 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,520 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (88%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.8% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 10.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.8% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 2.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.85 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 5.8–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.2–12.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.86 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.98 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 88% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors. - LVN A administered Resident #2's medications to Resident #1. Resident #1 had a change of condition (slow respirations and low oxygen saturation levels) and was sent to the hospital via 911 EMS where she was diagnosed and treated for opioid overdose.- LVN A did not administer Resident #2's daily 4:00 PM prescriptions. A past non-compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified at 1:50 p.m. on 5/27/2026. The immediacy began on 5/24/2026 and ended on 5/25/2026. While the immediacy was removed on 5/25/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not IJ due to the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure was identified as past noncompliance IJ as the facility had instituted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for reviewed for neglect for denture care and supervision at meals, in that: The facility failed to identify care or support for Resident #2's dentures. During 3 meals, on 02/20/2023 and 02/21/2023, Resident #2 choked on food and aspirated food. Resident #2 swallowed her lower dentures which became lodged in the back of her throat during the 2nd meal and was served the third meal in this condition. [Choking occurs when the airway is blocked by food, drink, or foreign objects. Aspiration occurs when food, drink, or foreign objects are breathed into the lungs (going down the wrong tube).] An IJ was identified on 03/24/2023. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 05:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 03/25/2023, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for two of six residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 medical records included provider, psychiatric referrals, and visits following physical aggression incidents.The facility failed to ensure Residet #1's and Resident #2 medical record included quarterly Interdisciplinary Team Meeting (IDT) with the PASARR Service Coordinator regarding their current mental status and service needs. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. The findings included:1.Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 06/25/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE].Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was completed in a timely manner and included pain he experienced, code status, ADL functional status, bladder/bowel incontinence, cognitive loss, skin risk, diet orders, or psychotropic drug use. This deficient practice could cause confusion for staff members responsible for providing direct care to the residents and place residents at risk of receiving improper care and services. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 12/04/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for freedom from physical and chemical restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was free from physical restraint when nursing staff physically restrained her for medication administration on 06/02/25, 06/04/25, and 06/17/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of unnecessary restriction of their freedom of movement (any change in place or position for the body or any part of the body that the person is physically able to control). The findings include: Record review of Resident #29's admission record reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #4, #5, #9, #15, and #134), and the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconcilitation for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of medications administered to Resident #134. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #4, #5, #9, and #15 received medications as ordered by the physician. 3. The facility failed to prevent the loss of 2 tablets of Resident #4's hydrocodone-acetaminophen, a narcotic pain medication. 4. The facility failed to discard expired insulin for Resident #15. These failures could lead to inaccurate administration of medications, ineffective therapeutic effects, and injury or illness. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #134's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dietary requirements. The DM did not have the appropriate certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failurecould place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. Record review of the staff roster revealed DM's hire date was 6/24/2024. In an interview on 6/17/2025 at 11:19 AM, the DM reported to the SSA that he was not currently certified as a food services manager. He stated he was enrolled in an educational program to obtain certification. He stated his prior professional experience helped him to prepare for his role as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure that residents had suitable, nourishing meals and snacks outside of scheduled meal service times for 1 of 1 facility reviewed. The facility failed to ensure residents were offered snacks at bedtimes. This failure could affect all residents who received meals served from the facility's only kitchen by placing residents at risk for, unplanned weight loss, and side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of the Mealtimes, undated, reflected: Dining Room: Breakfast 07:45 AM, Lunch 11:45 AM, and Supper 05:45 PM; Hall Trays: Breakfast 07:30 AM, Lunch 11:30 AM, and Supper 05:30 PM. Record review of the snack times, undated, reflected 09:30 AM, 02:30PM, and 07:00 PM. Confidential interviews during the Resident Meeting on 06/18/25 at 01:03 PM revealed the facility did not offer snacks at bedtime and they would like to be offered snacks at bedtime. Interview on 06/19/25 at 07:05 PM, the ADM revealed the facility did not have a nourishment room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to label the drink containers in the dining room, which were used by residents for hydration. 2. The facility failed to store raw protein food items below fully cooked foods in the freezer. 3. The facility failed to not store personal beverages in the food preparation area. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Interview and observation on 06/17/25 at 11:19 AM, the drink containers in the dining room were not labeled. The DM revealed the kitchen staff knew to date and label kitchen items, but he had to keep reminding them because they tended to forget. 2. Interview and observation on 06/17/25 at 11:19 AM, there were raw proteins (chicken and beef patties) stored in a freezer above biscuit dough. The DM revealed raw proteins should be stored below fully cooked items. 3. Interview and observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 staff members (CNA G and CNA I) reviewed for pre-employment TB screenings, 3 of 3 staff members (CNA G, CNA I, and LVN E) reviewed for pre-employment vaccinations, and 2 of 2 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #134) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. 1. The facility failed to screen staff members CNA G and CNA I for TB prior to hire, per CDC guidelines. 2. The facility failed to offer a vaccination for hepatitis B upon hire to staff members CNA G, CNA I, and LVN E per OSHA and CDC guidelines. 3. The facility failed to utilize proper PPE procedures during TBP for Resident #5 and Resident #134. These failures could result in the development and spread of infection or illness. Findings included: Record review of employee files revealed the following: a. CNA G: hire date of 4/21/2025 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed of, and participate in, their treatments, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for antipsychotic medication administration. Resident #29 was prescribed and received the antipsychotic medication Haldol for disorganized schizophrenia without evidence in her medical record of the state consent form 3713. The deficient practices could place residents at risk for side effects for which they did not consent. The findings included: Record review of Resident #29's admission record revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), anxiety disorder, psychosis (state of impaired reality), and restlessness and agitation. Record review of Resident #29's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/20/25, reflected Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 0 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility inaccurately assessed Resident #10 as not requiring a mechanical lift for transferring in the quarterly MDS submitted on 1/22/2025. This failure could lead to residents not receiving required care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's facesheet, printed 6/20/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle breakdown), other lack of coordination, and other reduced mobility. Record teview of the quarterly MDs submitted 4/24/2025 revealed a BIMS score of 06, indicating severely impaired cognition. Section GG of this MDS was not assessed. The prior quarterly MDS, submitted 1/22/2025, question GG0110 did not include mechanical lift in the assessment of prior device usage. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 16 residents (Residents #29) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop care plan interventions to include Resident #29 needing a therapeutic hold for medication administration. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services related to their identified needs to maintain or reach their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Record review of Resident #29's admission record revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received appropriate care and treatment for the indwelling catheter device placed after admission. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's foley catheter was secured appropriately. This failure could lead to infection or injury. Record review of Resident #5's facesheet, printed 6/17/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5 diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasic without lower urinary tract symptoms (enlargement of the prostate gland that can cause difficulty or the inability to urinate). Record review of the quarterly MDS, submitted 5/21/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 9, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for all nursing staff in 1 of 1 facilities where therapeutic holds were used. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were trained to therapeutically hold Resident #29 for medication administration. This failure could place residents at risk for harm due to staff who lack the appropriate skills and competencies to provide and minimize infections. The findings include: Record review of Resident #29's admission record reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), anxiety disorder, psychosis (state of impaired reality), and restlessness and agitation. Record review of Resident #29's admission MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have drugs and biologicals used in the facility labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (200-300 halls cart) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to label the expiration dates of opened/unrefrigerated insulin stored in the medication cart for Resident #2. This failure could lead to ineffective insulin therapy, hyperglycemia, and illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's facesheet, printed [DATE], revealed a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a relevant diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (the body's inability to self-regulate blood sugar leading to elevated levels). Review of the quarterly MDS, submitted [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #2's EMR contained the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed of, and participate in, their treatments, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for antipsychotic medication administration. Resident #29's June MAR did not reflect that RisperDAL Consta Intramuscular Suspension Reconstituted ER 50 MG was given on 06/04/25 and 06/17/25. The deficient practices could place residents at risk for side effects for which they did not consent. The findings included: Record review of Resident #29's admission record revealed Resident #29 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), anxiety disorder, psychosis (state of impaired reality), and restlessness and agitation. Record review of Resident #29's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/20/25, reflected Resident #29 had a BIMS score of 0 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It further reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 3 (Residents #11, #15, and #18) of 20 residents reviewed for dignity. 1. Resident #11's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:00 a.m. had the left armrest vinyl torn and sharp and appeared worn and damaged. 2. Resident #15's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:12 a.m., had both armrests vinyl torn and worn on the edges. 3. Resident #18's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:15 a.m. had both armrests vinyl torn and worn. The left side armrest was missing vinyl and foam and the baseboard was exposed. These deficient practices affect residents who rely on facility equipment for mobilization and could result in loss of self-esteem, dignity, and increased lack of self-worth. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's electronic face sheet dated 05/14/2024 reflected he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, for 7 of 20 residents (Residents #11, #15, #16, #19, #21, #22, and #29) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's incontinence was reflected in his care plan. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's pacemaker information was in his care plan. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's bowel incontinence was reflected in her care plan. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's did not have a care plan for handrails in bed. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's diagnoses, compression stockings, and diuretic were reflected in her care plan. 6. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 (residents #21, and #22) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident #21's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not revised after her quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 03/17/24 to reflect she had taken antianxiety medication. 2. Resident #22's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not revised or updated based on the facility policy to not use chair and bed alarms for prevention of fall, but the care plan reflected continually using chair and bed alarms. These deficient practices affect residents who receive assessments and could result in an inaccurate comprehensive person-centered care plan and missed care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's electronic face sheet dated 05/14/2024 reflected she was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Residents #6, #16, #26, and #134) of 20 residents reviewed for competent nursing care. 1. CNA G failed to spread and cleaned within Resident #6's labial folds after an incontinent episode. 2. CNA A applied barrier cream to Resident #16's open wounds. CNA A reapplied Resident #16's wound dressing that had fallen off into the soiled brief. 3. LVN D failed to follow facility procedure when she instilled eye drops for Residents #26. 4. LVN C crushed medications for Resident #134, that were noted to be Do Not Crush. These deficient practices affect residents who depend on nursing care and could place residents at risk for injury, infection, and harm. The findings included: 1. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Menus and nutritional adequacy. Menus must Meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines.; Be prepared in advance; Be followed for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. Food items were not in the kitchen, pasteurized eggs or shelled eggs, bananas, bread and onions. Resident #29 and #17 preferred fried eggs. Resident group stated they would prefer fried eggs (#17, #24, #13) and Resident #18 preferred hard-boiled eggs for chef salad . 2. Kitchen cook J served residents for breakfast 1 slice of bacon, instead to two slices. Resident #2, #4, #13, #24, #29 had 1 slice of bacon for breakfast. 3. The facility failed to post of the weekly at a glance menu. This could affect all residents that eat in the dining area and could result in residents not aware of what will be on menu for the week. This could affect all residents that eat from the kitchen and place them at risk of improper food handling. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides-Food that accommodates resident preferences for 5 of 16 (#13, #17, #18, #24 and #29) reviewed for preferences, in that: Residents #13, #17, #18, #24 and #29 were not served their preferences. No documentation of dietary assessment with preferences. This could affect all residents with food preferences and could result in a decrease in resident choices and diminished interest in meals. The Findings were: Interview on 5/14/2024 at 1:35 PM in a group meeting, Resident #13, #17, #24 and #29 stated they preferred fried eggs and Resident #18 preferred hard-boiled eggs for his chef salad. 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 5/16/2024 reflected she was admitted on [DATE], re-admitted on [DATE] she was [AGE] years old. Resident #13 Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMS score of 9/15 (moderate cognitive impairment). Record review of Resident #13's food preference assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, except when a nourishing snack was served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal spa: the failure to ensure residents were made aware of how to obtain a snack when desired for 4 of 9 residents (confidential residents in group) reviewed for frequency of meals. The facility failed to ensure residents were offered snacks at bedtimes as required due to mealtimes being more than 14 hours apart. This failure could affect all residents who received meals served from the facility's only kitchen by placing residents at risk for, unplanned weight loss, and side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the resident snack list, no date was provided by the DM. There were 27 residents that received morning and afternoon snacks. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed of properly for 1 of 1 facility, in that: The area near the facility's two dumpsters was on dirt and not concrete slab . This deficient practice could lead to an unsanitary environment and encourage the presence of pests. The findings were: Observation on 5/13/2024 at 10:02 AM., of the area near the facility's 2 dumpsters reflected there were on dirt and not concrete slab. Observation of a concrete slab big enough for 1 dumpster near the 2 dumpsters. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 10:03 AM with the DM stated the 2 dumpsters had been moved to a dirt ground due to only had room for 1 dumpster on a concrete slab. DM was not sure how long the 2 dumpsters were moved to the dirt. Interview on 5/16/2024 at 5:33 PM with ADM stated she was not aware of the 2 dumpsters in dirt, instead of a concrete slab. ADM stated no policy on dumpsters that required to be on concrete slab. Record review of FDZ Food code, 5-5 Refuse, Recyles, and Returnables section- 5-501.11 Outdoor Storage Surface. An outdoor storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (#16, #29 and #134) of 20 residents reviewed for infection control, in that:. 1. CNA A, and CNA E failed to follow EBP signage instructions for Resident #16 by not sanitizing hands prior to entering or reentering Resident #16's room, and CNA #16 put the dirty dressing back onto Resident #16's buttock wound after the dressing fell onto the dirty brief during incontinent care. RN F performed a dressing change for Resident #16 without wearing a gown. 2. The facility failed to have signage on Resident #29's room door to indicate he was on EBP. 3. Resident #134's nebulizer mask and oxygen tubing with nasal cannula was left unbagged when not in use. These deficient practices could affect residents and place them at risk for cross contamination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the maintenance of mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 3 (Residents #11, #15 and #18) of 20 residents reviewed for safe environment, in that:. 1. Resident #11's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:00 a.m. had the left armrest vinyl torn and sharp and appeared worn and damaged. 2. Resident #15's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:12 a.m., had both armrests vinyl torn and worn on the edges. 3. Resident #18's wheelchair on 05/14/2024 at 10:15 a.m. had both armrests vinyl torn and worn. The left side armrest was missing vinyl and foam and the baseboard was exposed. These deficient practices could affect residents who rely on facility equipment for mobilization and could result in skin tears or injuries. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's electronic face sheet dated (05/14/2024) reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: abnormalities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility assessments failed to accurately reflect the resident's status for 2 (Resident #14 and #21) of 20 residents reviewed for assessments. 1. Resident #14's significant change MDS assessment with an ARD of 02/08/2024 inaccurately reflected the resident had significant weight loss, but she did not have significant weight loss. 2. Resident #21's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 03/17/24 did not reflect she had a fall, and inaccurately reflected she was taking an antidepressant and diuretic. These deficient practices affect residents at the facility who require assistance with services and ADL's and could result in missed or inaccurate care. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident # 14's electronic face sheet dated 05/17/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side (paralysis of partial body function on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that when the facility anticipated discharge, a resident must have a discharge summary that included, but was not limited to, the following: A recapitulation of the resident's stay that included, but was not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results for 1 of 3 (#31) closed records. Resident #31's discharge summary was not signed by a physician. This could affect all discharge residents and could result in record errors. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 5/17/2024 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 2/27/2024. Record review of Resident #31's discharge MDS dated [DATE] reflected this was a planned discharge, to home/community and she was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #31's Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 went home with home health and no physician signature or date. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident choices for 1 (Resident #16) of 20 residents observed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain an order for barrier cream to be applied to Resident #16's buttocks and peri area after incontinent care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #16's electronic face sheet dated 05/15/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to general deterioration of brain), age related osteoporosis (deterioration in bone mass, increasing risk for fracture), contracture (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) of right and left shoulder, and psychosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for incontinent care. CNA G failed to spread and clean within Resident #6's labial folds after an incontinent episode. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 6's electronic face sheet dated 05/17/2024 reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: cerebral infarction (damage to tissues on the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that were severe), hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormone), neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain form nerve damage), and glaucomatous flecks (disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11.54%, based on 3 errors out of 26 opportunities which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #134) reviewed for medication administration and medication errors. LVN C crushed 3 medications, 2 capsules and 1 tablet that were on the Do Not Crush list during medication pass for Resident #134. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #134's electronic face sheet dated 05/15/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #134) were free of any significant medication errors whenobserved for medication pass. LVN C crushed 3 medications for Resident #134 that had Do Not Crush labeled on them during medication administration pass. This deficient practice affects residents with medications that are not recommended to be crushed and could result in physical harm or distress. The findings included: Record review of Resident #134's electronic face sheet dated 05/15/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, poisoning by cardiac-stimulant glycosides and drugs of similar action, congestive heart failure and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #134 was not at the facility long enough for an MDS assessment. Record review of Resident #134's baseline care plan dated 05/13/2024 reflected Resident admitted for skilled care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment required for 1 of 1 facility, in that: The Dietary Manager (DM) did not have the appropriate certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This deficient practice could place the residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. The findings included: Observation on 5/14/2024 at 9:50 AM in the kitchen with the DM revealed no pasteurized eggs or shelled eggs in refrigerator. Interview on 5/14/2024 at 3:55 PM the Dietary Manager (DM) stated he was not certified, and he was not trained as a kitchen manger. The DM stated he used to be a dietary aide and was promoted. (not sure of date).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 8 (#2) residents, in that: Resident #2 was served a puree meat, instead of mechanical soft. This could affect all resident with diet orders that were prescribed by a physician and could result in residents not served the correct diet texture. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 5/16/2024 reflected she was admitted on [DATE], age was 71. Her diagnoses included polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body) in disease, muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease.), feeding difficulties, cognitive communications deficit. Record review of Resident #2's consolidated physician orders for May 2024 reflected her diet, regular mechanical soft, ground meat and pureed fruits and vegetables, diagnoses Dysphagia. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed for infections. The facility failed to follow protocols when Resident #1 was diagnosed with Salmonella: a. There was not a physician's order or a sign on Resident #1's room to inform nursing staff and others he was on contact precautions for an infection. b. The ADM and DON did not contact the local state authority or HHSC to report Resident #1 was diagnosed with Salmonella. These deficient practices could affect any resident and contribute to the spread of infections. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/7/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm.) and Hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #2, #32, #28, and #7) reviewed for care plans in that: Residents #32 and #7 did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan in their resident file. Residents #2 and #28 did not have a comprehensive care plan that met a resident's medical needs. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs. The findings were: - Record review of Resident #32's face sheet dated 3/23/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include malignant neoplasm of brain (a fast-growing tumor in the brain), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a condition where acidic gastric fluid flows backward into the esophagus), and depression. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as DON on a full-time basis in that: - The facility had no full time Director of Nurses (DON) from October of 2022 through present [3/22/23]. This failure could place all residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services. The findings included: Record review of facility policy on Director of Nursing Services revealed that the Director is employed full-time at 40-hours per week. In an interview on 3/21/23 at 11:28 AM, the ADON stated there was no DON at the facility, and she believed the regional DON was the acting DON. In an interview on 3/21/23 at 3:20 PM, the Administrator stated the facility had no full time DON and the corporate regional RN's assisted with nursing services. In an interview on 3/24/23 at 1:10 PM the Regional DON stated the facility had no full-time designated DON. The regional DON stated she was not in the facility for 40 hours a week and occasionally was in the facility.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-26 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ or contract with a qualified social worker for a facility of 120 beds or less for 1 of 1 facility in that: The facility failed to ensure an employed or contracted social worker visited the facility as needed. This failure could place all residents at risk for not receiving necessary social services. The findings included: In an interview on 3/21/23 at 11:28 AM, the ADON stated that the facility did not have a social worker employed, and she was not aware of a contracted social worker. In an interview on 3/21/23 at 3:20 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a social worker employed or contracted to come to the facility. The administrator stated they do not have a specific policy on social workers or social services, and the facility follows federal and state regulations as policy. In an interview on 3/24/23 at 1:10 PM, the regional DON stated that the facility did not employ or contract a social worker on a full-time or part-time basis. The regional DON stated the facility follows the federal and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure proper food storage of dry goods and fresh produce. This failure could place all residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at increased risk of food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 3/21/23 at 11:09 AM revealed a 10-pound box labeled imitation bacon bits open, undated, in a dry storage area in the kitchen. Upon further investigation, box appeared open with bag full of red flakes approximately 3 cm in diameter, and the bag is open. Observation on 3/22/23 at 9:11 AM revealed a box labeled Idaho potatoes unlabeled and on the floor of a dry storage area in the kitchen. Fresh produce resembling potatoes observed through holes in box. In an interview on 3/25/23 at 10:20 AM, the FSM stated that boxes should be dated with either markers or stickers. She stated that the items in the box labeled imitation bacon bits should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-26 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff; individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement; and volunteers, consistent with their expected roles, for 1 of 1 Activities Director Care Plan Coordinator, reviewed for training as the care plan coordinator, in that: The facility failed to train the Activities Director in the assigned job as the care plan coordinator. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not having a complete and accurate care plan to support the residents needs and preferences. The finding included: A record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 03/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 02/27/2023, with diagnoses which included pneumonia due to inhalation of food and vomit [an infection of the lungs can be life-threatening to anyone, but particularly to infants, children, and people over 65], reduced mobility and the need for assistance with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 24 Residents (Resident #13) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin, in that: The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency when Resident #13 was discovered with a large bruise over her chest and around her back . Resident #13 could not state how she developed the bruise, and no one witnessed the development of the bruise. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not reporting, not investigating and providing for oversight of the investigation to reveal the possible source of the injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's assessment accurately reflected the resident's status, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for lack of assessment for dentures, in that: 1. Resident #2 was admitted and assessed without documenting her need for dentures after a hospitalization where Resident #2 was treated for having swallowed her dentures. This failure could have placed residents at risk for harm by unidentified dentures and lack of care and support for the dentures. The findings included: A record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 03/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 11/22/2022 and 02/27/2023, with diagnoses which included pneumonia due to inhalation of food and vomit [an infection of the lungs can be life-threatening to anyone, but particularly to infants, children, and people over 65], reduced mobility and the need for assistance with personal care. A record review of Resident #2's hospital discharge records, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-26 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, taking into consideration resident assessments, individual plans of care and the number, acuity and diagnosis of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment requirement, for 1 of 1 kitchen staff (Food Service Manager) reviewed for qualifications, in that: - The Dietary Manager did not have the appropriate license, certification, or qualifications to function as the food service supervisor. This failure could place all residents who consume food prepared from the kitchen at increased risk of food borne illness and not receiving adequate nutrition. The findings included: Record review of the certifications obtained by facility kitchen staff revealed that the FSM did not have the certification required for her current position. In an interview on 3/25/23 at 10:20 AM, the FSM revealed she does not have the certification required for her current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: LVN A failed to document an order for a urinalysis laboratory test ordered for Resident #30. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by inaccurate records. The findings included: A record review of Resident #30's Face Sheet, dated 03/22/2023, revealed an admission date of 01/06/2022, with diagnosis which included obstructive and reflux uropathy [a condition when the passage of urine from the kidneys to the exterior is blocked by an obstruction anywhere along the urinary tract]. A record review of Resident #30's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 was an [AGE] year-old female assessed with severe mental cognition impairment, as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 05 out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident for residents in 9 of 9 multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315, and 317). Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315, and 317 did not have the required 80 square feet per resident. These failures could affect the residents placed in these multiple occupancy rooms and place them at-risk by reducing their living space and posing problems in their activities of daily living. The findings were: Record review of Form 3740 Bed Classifications, completed by the Administrator on 06/18/2025, revealed rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315 and 317 were classified to have 3 resident beds in each room. Room size measurements in 2024 and 2023 of the rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315 and 317 were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (3-person room - 0 residents in room) 14.9 ft x 14.83 ft = 221.7 sq ft / 3 residents = 73.9 sq. ft/resident 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident for residents in 10 of 10 multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 210, 211, 315, and 317). Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 210, 211, 315, and 317 did not have the required 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could affect the residents placed in these multiple occupancy rooms and place them at-risk by reducing their living space and posing problems in their activities of daily living. The findings were: Record review of Form 3740 Bed Classifications, completed by the Administrator on 2/26/2020, revealed rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 210, 211, 315 and 317 were classified to have 3 resident beds in each room. Observation on 02/26/2020 from 11:00 AM to 11:17 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed the measurements of the rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 210, 211, 315 and 317 were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (3person room - 2 residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-03-26 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident for residents in 9 of 9 multiple occupancy resident rooms (Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315, and 317). Rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315, and 317 did not have the required 80 square feet per resident. These failures could affect the residents placed in these multiple occupancy rooms and place them at-risk by reducing their living space and posing problems in their activities of daily living. The findings were: Record review of Form 3740 Bed Classifications, completed by the Administrator on 2/26/2020, revealed rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315 and 317 were classified to have 3 resident beds in each room. Observation on 02/26/2020 from 11:00 AM to 11:17 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed the measurements of the rooms 109, 111, 112, 201, 204, 209, 211, 315 and 317 were as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (3 person room - 2 residents in room) 14.9 ft x 14.83 ft = 221.7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,520 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $23,520 — penalty dated 2026-05-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAL VERDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2020 |
| JURADO, JORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| 1117 S ADAMS STREET OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| KOTHMANN, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| 1117 S ADAMS STREET PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DENNIS, WANDA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675169. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.