Avir At Gonzales
3428 Moulton Rd, Gonzales, TX 78629 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (830) 672-2867 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.0% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.56 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.14 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.56 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 42.0 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.65 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.52 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.80 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current nurse staffing data for 1 of 1 facility, in that: The nurse staffing data upon entrance on 6/16/26 was dated 6/9/26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk by not providing adequate staffing information for the residents, staff, and visitors to ensure that resident care needs are met. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current nurse staffing data for 1 of 1 facility, in that: The nurse staffing data upon entrance on 6/16/26 was dated 6/9/26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care by not providing adequate staffing information for the residents, staff, and visitors to ensure that resident care needs are met. Findings included: Observation on 6/16/26 at 11:04 am, revealed a posting detailing nurse staffing information for 6/16/26 was not available in the facility lobby. Further observation revealed that the Daily Nurse Staffing Report was dated 6/9/26. During an interview on 6/16/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) reviewed for dental services. The facility did not ensure Resident #1's physician was contacted for an order to withhold blood thinners prior to dental extractions on 5/19/26. The facility did not ensure Resident #4's physician was contacted for an order to withhold blood thinners prior to dental extractions on 5/19/26. This failure could place residents at risk of bleeding and diminished quality of life.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 6/16/26, revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Cerebral Infarction (stroke - disrupted blood flow to the brain). Record review of Resident #1's Dental Treatment Note, dated 5/19/26, revealed: .tooth #4,28,29 extracted. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with assistance with the bathroom for more than 40 minutes following his second verbal request to CNA A on 1/02/2026. This failure could affect and diminish the resident's quality of life by potentially placing the resident at risk of infections, skin breakdown and/or it can make the resident feel neglected affecting their mental health and overall psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 1/03/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (also known as an ischemic stroke, occurs when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked, cutting off oxygen supply to brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage of eight (8) hrs daily and a full time DON for eight days (11/1/25, 11/2/25,11/6/25,11/9/25,11/12/25, 11/13/25,11/17/25, and 11/18/25) in November 2025 for 1 of 1 facility. The facility failed to ensure RN 8 hour daily coverage and a full time DON in the facility for eight days in November 2025. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of not having their care needs assessed by a licensed RN on a daily basis.The findings included: Record review of the facility's daily nursing staffing for the time period of 10/31/25 through 11/24/25 revealed there were eight days in the month of November 2025 in which there was not an RN or DON working at the facility during the 24 hour time period for the following days (11/1/25,11/2/25,11/6/25, 11/9/25, 11/12/25,11/13/25, 11/17/25, and 11/18/25). During an interview on 11/26/25 at 9:00 a.m. with the Corporate RN-A she advised that she had visited the facility as much as possible since the DON position became vacant in order to provide the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate communication system to allow residents to call for staff assistance for 3 of 9 rooms (Rooms# 108,109, and 206) reviewed on the three resident hallways for an operating call light system. The facility failed to ensure Resident rooms # 108, 109, and 206 had a fully functional call light notification system. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of not being able to call for staff assistance to meet care needs.The findings included: Record review of the facility floor plan revealed there were three resident hallways (hallway #'s 100, 200, and 300). Record review of the facility's maintenance repair log from 01/25 through 10/25 revealed maintenance repairs on all of the three resident hallways included call light notification repairs which had been completed. Observation rounds on 11/25/25 from 2:55 p.m. through 3:15 p.m with the Maintenance Director and Activity Director., revealed that the room dome…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, for 3of 8 residents (Residents #1, #6, and #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a care plan accessible in his current active record. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's diagnoses of anxiety and depression, including a past history of self-harm, were focus areas on the resident's comprehensive care plan. 3. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan to reflect Resident #3's surgical removal of his kidneys. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for having their medical, nursing and psychosocial needs not being met and staff who provide direct care to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to use the services of an RN as required for 13 days during the period between 3/1/2025 through 7/20/2025. This could result in residents not receiving the needed care and services to meet their needs and could result in illness, a decline in health, and in quality of care.The findings were: Review of the facility's RN hours revealed there were no RN coverage hours on the following dates: 4/13/2025; 4/26/2025; 5/10/2025; 5/11/2025; 5/24/2025; 5/25/2025; 6/15/2025; 6/21/2025; 6/28/2025; 6/29/2025; 7/4/2025; 7/5/2025; 7/6/2025. During an interview on 07/24/2025 at 3:17 p.m., the Administrator reviewed the time sheets for RN hours and confirmed there was no RN coverage on the listed dates. The Administrator stated they didn't have enough RNs to cover all the weekend slots, and stated it was very tough hiring enough RNs in rural settings. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 12% based on 3 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 2 (Residents #1 and #11) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors, in that: 1. Medication aide-B (MA-B) administered Resident #11 his medication Omeprazole (a medication used to reduce the amount of acid produced by the stomach and recommended to be taken on a empty stomach before a meal) late by 1 hour and 48 minutes. 2. MA-B administered Resident #1's Refresh Optive Mega-3 eyedrops (a medication to relieve eye dryness), late by 4.5 hours. 3. MA-B administered Resident #1's Refresh Optive Mega-3 eyedrops, one drop to each eye on 07/24/2025 at 12:28 p.m., but the physician order indicated REFRESH OPTIVE ADVANCED DROPS Instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day related to LEGAL BLINDNESS. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the alternative or option preferred for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #6) whose records were reviewed for informed consent. The facility failed to ensure psychoactive medication consents for Resident #6 were signed and dated by her POA (Power of Attorney) for the use of: Seroquel (antipsychotic medication); Buspar (anti-anxiety); Zoloft (anti-depressant); Trazodone (anti-depressant); and Depakote (anti-convulsant also used to treat mood disorder) This failure could place residents at risk for receiving psychoactive medications without consent and knowledge of side effects.The findings were: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record dated 07/23/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Psychotic Disorder with delusions due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility did not refer Resident #6 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she was admitted with diagnoses including: Psychotic Disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (mental disorder which consists of a belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence to the contrary); Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities); and Anxiety Disorder (condition with intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated and receiving needed PASRR services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record dated 07/23/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old woman admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility, were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 (Hall 300 Nurse's medication cart) of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure one controlled medication Morphine Sulfate 20mg/5ml oral suspension for Resident #8 was removed from the medication cart when it had expired on 12/28/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's admission Record dated 07/22/2025 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old woman admitted [DATE] with re-admission on [DATE] and with diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease that blocks air flow and makes it difficult to breathe). Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #4 and #15) reviewed for personal food policy, in that: 1.Resident # 4's personal refrigerator located in her room revealed food item of a glass jar of Picante Sauce which had been opened with a Best Use By Date of February 9,2025. There was no label or date of when the jar had been opened. 2.Resident # 15's personal refrigerator located in his room revealed food item of a Styrofoam cup covered with clear plastic wrap with white liquid inside it. There was no label or date identifying the name or date. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which might be spoiled. The findings included:Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 07/24/2025, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's application of TED hose was accurately documented on his Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 23 of 23 daily entries in July 2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccessible and inaccurate clinical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man admitted [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Legal Blindness (visual acuity of 20/200 meaning a person an see at 20 feet what a person with normal vision can see at 200 feet), Borderline Intellectual Functioning (cognitive abilities that are below average, but not enough to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #4 and #24) reviewed for infection control: 1.The facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures when LVN-A place Resident #4's open left heel wound directly onto the Resident's bedspread to during wound care treatment. 2.The facility failed to ensure MA-B sanitized the blood pressure cuff per facility protocol before and after checking Resident #24's blood pressure. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #4's admission Record dated 07/25/2025 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Venous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #1) whose assessment records were reviewed. The facility failed when nursing staff did not code on Section GG of MDS Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] that Resident #1 had functional limitation in range of motion to her upper extremity. This deficient practice could affect residents and contribute to residents not receiving care and services as needed. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed 04/29/25, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]/24 with a primary diagnoses of myopathy (a disease of the muscle in which muscle fibers do not function properly), Rheumatoid Arthritis (an autoimmune disorder where the immune system attacks to joints, causing inflammation, pain and potential joint damage), Osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease characterized by the breakdown of joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of 8 residents (Residents # 2, #3 and #7) reviewed for respiratory therapy. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a physician order, was care planned or had an oxygen safety sign on the resident's room door. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a physician order, was care plan or had an oxygen safety sign on the resident's room door. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had a care plan or oxygen safety sign on the door. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support which could result in a decline in health. Findings include: 1) Record review of Resident #2's, undated, face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #6) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of resident needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had access to his call light which was draped over his nightstand outside of the resident's reach. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had access to her call light which was wrapped around the call light plug on the wall, behind Resident #6 and outside of her reach. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings include: 1) Record review of Resident #2's, undated, face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and #4) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #1's enhanced barrier precautions which required staff to utilize gowns and gloves when direct care was provided. 2. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #4's enhanced barrier precautions which required staff to utilize gowns and gloves when providing direct care. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of an infection. The findings include: 1) Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-07 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the residents' right to receive mail, for 1 of 1 facility review for residents' right to receive mail, in that: Facility staff did not distribute mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: During a confidential group meeting on 06/05/2024 at 11:00 AM, members of the resident group stated they did not receive mail on Saturdays, they did not understand why it was not distributed on Saturdays, and stated they felt this practice was disrespectful. During an interview on 06/07/2024 at 11:22 AM with the BOM she stated she was the only one who distributed mail to the residents and did so Monday through Friday. Mail that came in on Saturdays remained in the mailbox until Monday. This had been the practice at the facility since she was hired in 2018. Department heads rotated serving as the manager on duty every weekend, but did not distribute the mail even though they had access to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to use the services of an RN as required, for 10 days, during the period between 3/1/2024 through 5/31/2024. This could result in resident's not receiving the needed care and services to meet their needs and could result in illness, a decline in health, and in quality of care. The findings were: Review of the facility's RN hours record revealed there were no RN coverage hours on 3/9/2024, 3/10/2024, 3/31/2024, 4/6/2024, 4/7/2024, 4/20/2024, 5/4/2024, 5/5/2024, 5/18/2024 and, 5/19/2024. All of these dates are on weekends. During an interview with the DON, on 6/6/2024 at 3:27 p.m., the DON stated the facility had two RN's, one full-time and one part-time, who worked different shifts, and confirmed there was no RN coverage on 3/9/2024, 3/10/2024, 3/31/2024, 4/6/2024, 4/7/2024, 4/20/2024, 5/4/2024, 5/5/2024, 5/18/2024 and, 5/19/2024. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10% based on 3 errors out of 30 opportunities, which involved 3 of 4 residents (Resident #3, Resident #22 and Resident #9) reviewed for medication errors. 1. Medication Aide D failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #3 by administering hydrocodone (a treatment for Pain) )1 hour and 20 minutes after the scheduled time. 2. Medication Aide D failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #22 by administering Duloxetine (a treatment for Depression and Nerve Pain) 1 hour and 42 minutes after the scheduled time. 3. Medication Aide D failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #9 by administering Metoprolol (a treatment for High blood pressure and Heart failure) 1 hour and 55 minutes after the scheduled time. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There was a bag of shredded cheese past its use-by date in the reach-in cooler. 2. There were cleaning supplies in the dry storage room. 3. There was a bag of breadcrumbs that was opened, unsealed, without a label and use-by date in the dry storage room. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 06/04/2024 at 10:10 AM revealed there was a 5-lb. bag of shredded Cheddar cheese on a shelf in the reach-in cooler. The cheese was in its original package and placed in a clear, gallon-sized, zipper-sealed bag. There was approximately ¾ lb. of cheese remaining in the bag. A small white sticker on the bag read, 5-7. During an interview on on 06/04/2024 at 10:12 AM with the DM she stated the numbers on the sticker meant the bag of cheese had been opened on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 of 6 residents (Residents #5, #9, #10 and, #32) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. Medication Aide D did not sanitize the Blood pressure cuff between Residents. 2. CNA B did not use the proper technique to sanitize her hands while providing incontinent care for Resident #10. 3. LVN E touched Resident #32's bed table and did not sanitize her hands prior to providing care. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 06/06/2024, revealed an admission date of 06/18/2019 and, a readmission date of 02/07/2024 with diagnoses which included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #9) of 14 residents reviewed for advance directives, in that: Resident #9 was unable to make her wishes of being full code known and, her OOH-DNR was executed by her family member without her consent or knowledge. This deficient practice put residents at risk of not having their rights honored when they stop breathing and there is no pulse. The findings were: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 06/06/2024, revealed an admission date of 07/06/2019 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Senile degeneration of brain (loss of intellectual ability associated with old age), chronic venous hypertension (abnormalities in the capillaries within the leg tissues allowing fluid, proteins and blood cells to leak into the tissues) and muscle wasting and atrophy (a decrease in muscle size and loss of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 2 of 6 resident (Residents #10 and #25) reviewed for privacy, in that: 1. CNA A and CNA B did not close completely Resident #10's privacy curtain while providing incontinent care. 2. LVN C left her computer screen open showing Resident #25's protected information while administering medications. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy. The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 06/06/2024, revealed an admission date of 03/02/2015 and, a readmission date of 02/07/2019, with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Hypothyroidism (under active thyroid), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood), Hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body), Hyperlipidemia(Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Hypertension (High blood pressure). Record review of Resident #10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident for 1 of 14 residents (Resident #39) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #39's care plan correctly noted the resident's exit seeking behavior in his care plan. This deficient practice could lead to improper identification of residents with elopement tendencies resulting in potential harm. The findings were: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 05/20/2023 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar), cognitive communication deficit (a problem with one or more cognitive skills involved in communication, such as attention, memory, or reasoning), dementia with psychotic disturbance (a decline in cognitive functioning, which includes thinking, remembering,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide Resident #9 with access to podiatry care. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of discomfort, poor foot hygiene, and a decline in residents' physical condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 06/06/2024, revealed an admission date of 07/06/2019 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Senile degeneration of brain (loss of intellectual ability associated with old age), chronic venous hypertension (abnormalities in the capillaries within the leg tissues allowing fluid, proteins and blood cells to leak into the tissues), coagulation deficit (problems with the ability to form clots) and muscle wasting and atrophy (a decrease in muscle size and loss of muscle tissue). Record review of Resident #9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 3 halls (Hall 300) observed for accidents and hazards, in that: The facility failed to ensure potential hazards were locked up in Hall 300 This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to an unsafe environment. The findings were: Observation on 06/06/2024 at 12:25 p.m. on Hall 300 revealed a container of Sani-Cloth, purple top (a germicidal wipe) on the 300 hall medication cart, on the left side of the cart. The container had physical and chemical hazard and precautionary statements., such as causes substantial but temporary eye damage. Call poison center or doctor for treatment advice. Further observation revealed several unnamed residents were seen in the hall. During an interview on 06/06/2024 at 12:30 p.m. with LVN E, she confirmed the container of Sani-Cloth was in the open and it contained wipes. She also confirmed there were multiple residents with dementia able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 3 medication carts (Hall 300 Medication Cart) reviewed for storage, in that: During medications administration, LVN C left Hall 300 Medication cart unlocked on 1 occasion. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed mediations. The findings were: Observation on 06/06/2024 at 11:16 a.m revealed LVN C was administering medications to residents. LVN C was checking Resident #5's blood sugar and going in his rooms. On one occasion the medication cart was left unlocked and out of sight of LVN C. Inside the unlocked cart were blister packs, bottles, and vials of medications for the residents. During an interview with LVN C on 06/06/2024 at 11:18 a.m., LVN C confirmed the medication cart was left unlocked while she was doing a blood sugar check in the resident's room. LVN C confirmed she knew she had to keep the cart locked and had forgotten.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility did not have Resident #42's most recent Physician Certification of Terminal Illness. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 10/11/2023 with diagnoses including: unspecified injury of right vertebral artery (can lead to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 16 residents (Residents #15, #35, and #43) reviewed for ADL's. 1. Resident #15 did not receive his scheduled showers. 2. Resident #35 did not receive her scheduled showers. 3. Resident #43 did not receive his scheduled showers. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care they require to maintain their highest practical well-being, and could result in low self-esteem, anxiety, embarrassment, and a decline in their quality of life. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: age-related cognitive decline, rhabdomyolysis, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of Resident #15's comprehensive MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care to include but not limited to assessing, evaluating, planning, and implementing resident care plans and responding to resident's needs for 1 of 5 facility nurses (GVN) evaluated for licensed nurses. The facility failed to ensure the GVN (Graduate Vocational Nurse) did not continue to work as a GVN after her permit to practice was expired from [DATE] to [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services to meet their needs by qualified, competent nurses. The findings were: Review of staff qualifications and training revealed the GVN was hired on [DATE]. Review of an email report from the Texas BON on [DATE] at 9:58 pm indicated the GVN was issued a graduate permit (pre-exam) for a LVN permit to practice on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week and failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full-time basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for nursing services. 1. The facility failed to designate a full time DON from 4/4/23 to 4/21/23. 2. The facility failed to use the services of an RN as required for 9 days. This could result in resident's not receiving the needed care and services to meet their needs and could result in illness, a decline in health, and in quality of care. The findings were: 1. Review of the facility's staff list revealed no DON was listed for the facility. Review of staffing records revealed the DON's last day at the facility was 4/4/23. In an interview on 4/18/23 at 2:30pm, the ADON stated the facility had two RN's that worked different shifts and the facility was utilizing them when an RN was needed. In an interview on 4/21/23 at 1:27pm the Administrator stated the DON's last day was 4/4/23 and a new DON had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote the residents' right to a dignified existence for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for dignity, in that: Resident #15's wheelchair was soiled and in disrepair. This deficient practice could lead to diminished self-esteem and quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: age-related cognitive decline, rhabdomyolysis, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of Resident #15's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 04/04/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 04 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #15's care plan, revised 04/20/2023, revealed a problem, Category: Pain. Resident is at risk for alteration in comfort and or pain R/T [related to]: chronic pain and an approach, Encourage mobility, physical activity as tolerated. Invite to activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #35) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #35's MDS assessment correctly noted the resident's lack of natural teeth, tooth fragments, and/or dentures. This deficient practice could lead to diminished quality of life or an inability to eat regular texture foods. The findings were: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #35's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 02/13/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed Section L: Oral Dental, Box B: No natural teeth or tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #35) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #35's MDS assessment correctly noted the resident's lack of natural teeth, tooth fragments, and/or dentures. This deficient practice could lead to diminished quality of life due to an inability to eat regular texture foods. The findings were: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #35's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 02/13/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed Section L: Oral Dental, Box B: No natural teeth or tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #35) whose assessments were reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #35's care plan correctly noted the resident's lack of natural teeth, tooth fragments, and/or dentures. This deficient practice could lead to diminished quality of life due to an inability to eat regular texture foods. The findings were: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #35's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 02/13/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed Section L: Oral Dental, Box B: No natural teeth or tooth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure drugs and biologicals were secured properly in 1 of 2 nurses' stations (Station 1) observed, in that: Three unsecured medications were found inside Resident #35's clinical record binder at nursing station #1. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for harm due to ingesting medications not prescribed to them, and possible drug diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #35's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident was dependent upon staff for assistance with activities of daily living. Record review of Resident #35's physician orders as of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchen, in that: 1. Individual packets of whipped spread were not refrigerated and not placed in an ice bath during preparation for the breakfast meal. 2. The top and sides of the dish sanitizing unit were soiled with a substance resembling sand. These deficient practices could lead to diminished quality of life due to foodborne illness. The findings were: Observation on 04/20/2023 at 7:24 a.m. revealed individual packets of whipped spread had been removed from the refrigerator and placed on a serving cart in preparation for the morning meal service. Further observation revealed the packets of whipped spread had not been placed in an ice bath. During an interview with Dietary Aide A on 04/20/2023 at 7:25 a.m., Dietary Aide A confirmed that this was the usual procedure, and that packets of whipped spread or butter were not placed in an ice bath routinely. During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility did not have Resident #33's most recent hospice Plan of Care, Hospice Consent and Election Form, and Physician Certification of Terminal Illness. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #33's facesheet, dated 04/21/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 public restroom on the 300 Hall, in that: The public restroom utilized by residents, staff, and visitors on the facility's 300 Hall had a sink which was loosely affixed to the wall, a toilet with stained and missing caulking and loosely affixed to the floor, dark gray and black stains in the toilet, and a stained washcloth on the floor. This deficient practice could lead to residents living in, staff working in, and residents visiting in an environment that is not safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable. The findings were: Observation on 04/18/2023 at 12:19 p.m., revealed the public restroom utilized by residents, staff, and visitors on the facility's 300 Hall had a sink which was loosely affixed to the wall, a toilet with stained and missing caulking and loosely affixed to the floor, dark gray and black stains in the toilet, and a stained washcloth on the floor. During an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GONZALES HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2025 |
| 3428 MOULTON ROAD PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| ANZALDUA, BRANDON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/01/2023 |
| CLAY, JULI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/06/2015 |
| 3428 MOULTON ROAD OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WALKER, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/21/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/21/2025 |
| MCCORD, JAMIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.