Avir at Grand Saline

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 68.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.17 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #1).The facility did not prevent Resident #1, who was wearing a Wanderguard bracelet, from leaving the facility unsupervised on 09/07/2025. Resident #1 was found at the intersection of the county road the facility resided on and a state farm to market road approximately 1.3 miles from the facility. The facility was not aware the resident was missing for approximately 1 hour. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 09/07/2025 and ended on 09/09/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.This failure could place residents at risk of potential accidents, injuries, harm, or death. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet on 10/27/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: schizoaffective disorder (a mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report to state agency emergency situations that pose a threat to resident health and safety immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for environmental safety.The facility failed to report an emergency situation involving a suspected gas leak/propane odor and fire department intervention to the State Agency within 24 hours of occurrence or discovery on 06/01/26. The fire department responded to the facility, investigated the reported propane odor, and shut off the propane supply to the oven.This failure could affect the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors due to exposure to a hazardous environmental condition within the facility.Record review of the local fire department's Public Disclosure Report dated 06/01/26 documented a response to a reported propane odor in the kitchen. Fire personnel assessed the area using a carbon monoxide monitor and detected no traces of CO. The report noted a faint propane odor associated with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and safety.-The facility failed to ensure the required cooking and holding temperatures were known and followed.-The facility failed to ensure food temperatures were consistently monitored and documented for March 2026.-The facility failed to ensure the DM provided oversight and verification of food safety practices.These failures could affect the residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included:Record review of March 2026 food temperature logs revealed the following:Review of available logs dated 03/02/2026, 03/03/2026, 03/04/2026, 03/05/2026, 03/09/2026, 03/10/2026, 03/11/2026, and 03/12/2026 showed the facility failed to document final internal cooking temperatures for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 facility kitchens.The facility failed to ensure the reach-in stainless steel freezers and coolers were free from food debris, dried liquid splatters and fingerprints.The facility failed to ensure the bulk bins for sugar, flour and cornmeal were kept clean.The facility failed to ensure the outside of the milk box was clean.The facility failed to ensure the areas above the ovens on the stove were kept clean.The facility failed to ensure the vent hood above the deep fryer was kept clean.These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness.Findings included:During observations and interviews on 02/02/2026 of the kitchen the following was noted:*at 10:00 AM the 2-door stainless steel freezer in the pantry. The indented areas under the handle pulls are filled with food debris, the stainless steel doors had fingerprints and there were splatters on the front vents and door sills, the bottom shelf…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 10 residents (Residents #64, #9, #20, and #47) reviewed for resident assessments. 1.The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening dated 9/15/25 for Resident #64. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (Delusional Disorder) was present on 3/22/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening dated 9/11/25 for Resident #9. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (Delusional Disorder) was present at the time.3. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #20. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) was present upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents 1 of 2 units (secure unit) reviewed for quality of life, in that: The facility failed to ensure there were organized activities available to secured unit residents on 02/02/26.The facility failed to ensure the activities calendar was initially posted for February, 2026, and once it was posted, was followed. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, behaviors, isolation, and lack of stimulation. Findings included: During an interview on 02/02/26 at 11:45AM, the family member of a resident in the secure unit, Family Member M, said the only time she saw activities conducted in the secured unit was when occupational therapy or hospice would come in and do some kind of activity. During an observation on 02/02/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 medication carts (Cart Hall 2 and Cart Halls 1 & 3) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the nursing staff responsible for the safekeeping of narcotics performed and documented change of shift narcotic counts on multiple shifts and days for Medication Cart Hall 2 and Cart Halls 1 & 3. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of medications and possible drug diversion.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 02/03/2026 at 09:01 AM, MA-B was noted standing at Medication Cart Hall 2. The top drawer of the cart was open and a key ring with keys on it was noted lying on top of the cart. When asked if MA-B was available for observation of medication administration, MA-B said she was not the medication aide for the residents. MA-B said she was the staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative when there was a decision to transfer the resident from the facility to the hospital resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #95) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to notify Resident #95's representative when he was sent to the hospital emergency room for a change in condition.This failure could result in the family or guardian not being aware of conditions that may require them to make medical decisions.Findings included:Record review of a facility face sheet dated 5/15/25 indicated Resident #95 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Parkinsonism, striatonigral degeneration (a rare, rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorder causing rigidity, slow movement, tremors, blood pressure drops and lack of muscle control and coordination causing awkward or clumsy movements), dementia without behavioral disturbance, mood disorder, vascular dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0680 — isolated
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for quality of life. The facility did not have a qualified Activities Professional to direct their activities program. This deficient practice could affect any resident and could result in residents not receiving activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident. Findings were: Record review on 02/3/2026 at 10:30 AM, of an audit of the facility's Administrative and other licensed professional staff's credentials revealed the current Activity Director was not certified. Also, during an audit of the staffing roster, there was no one listed as the official activity director In an interview on 02/03/2026 at 12:00 PM, the HR Coordinator said the facility's Activity Director was not certified In an interview on 02/03/2026 at 12:38 PM, the AD said she had been hired as the medication Aide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for infection control and prevention. The facility failed to ensure CNA G and CNA H donned (put on) appropriate PPE (a gown) prior to preparing Resident #2 for a transfer using a Hoyer lift and adjusting his urinary catheter drainage collection bag. This failure could place residents under their care at risk for the transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 02/02/2026 indicated Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] after a hospital stay. He had diagnoses which included heart disease, chronic kidney failure, influenza A, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-29 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's and Resident #4's baseline care plans were implemented and made available to nursing staff within 48 hours of admission. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's baseline care plan included instructions to address the principal diagnosis of COPD. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's baseline care plan included instructions to address identified risks for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. These failures could affect newly admitted residents and place them at risk of receiving inadequate care and services and not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to ensure their immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,410 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,410 — penalty dated 2025-10-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $719K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX