No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Grapevine

1500 Autumn Drive, Grapevine, TX 76051 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 126 certified beds · (817) 488-8585 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$29,614 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $29,614 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1600 W Northwest Hwy Ste 100 · (817) 912-0442 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1115 W Northwest Hwy · (817) 481-5780 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Tom Thumb0.5 mi
302 S Park Blvd · (817) 481-5669 · Call to confirm hours
Park
299 Ball St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1224 Hilltop Dr · (817) 481-2978

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.3%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.3%88.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.5%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.682.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.172.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.2–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified78.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.2–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.27
RN hoursweekends
51.9%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 88.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-03-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provided basic life support, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for CPR. LVN A failed to initiate CPR when Resident #11 did not have a State recognized advance directive which meant the resident was a Full Code status, and he was found on the floor on the fall mat with his face noted to be reddish purple, weak pulse with no obvious respirations or breathing patterns noted. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:45 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility was continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had the right to be free from abuse when Resident #7 pushed her on 01/21/25, causing Resident #6 to fall which resulted in a pelvic fracture. An IJ was identified on 03/12/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:51 PM. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility was continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/27/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #6's significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a change in the resident's condition or a need to alter treatment for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for physician consultation. LVN A failed to consult with the physician for Resident #1 when the resident had a change of condition on 06/15/24. Resident #1 displayed signs and symptoms of pain when her left leg was touched on 06/15/24 at 7:45 PM. The physician was not notified the resident had a change of condition until the next morning 06/16/24 at approximately 6:00 AM and ordered x-rays, which reflected the resident had a left hip fracture, and she was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 0719/24. While the IJ was removed on 07/19/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. LVN A failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with timely treatment when the resident had a changed of condition on 06/15/24. Resident #1 displayed signs and symptoms of pain when her left leg was touched on 06/15/24 at 7:45 PM. The physician was not notified the resident had a change of condition until the next morning 06/16/24 at approximately 6:00 AM and ordered x-rays, which revealed the resident had a left hip fracture, and she was sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 0719/24. While the IJ was removed on 07/19/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 12 of 74 days (01/12/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 02/22/25, 02/23/25, 03/01/25, 03/02/25, 03/08/25, 03/09/25, 03/15/25, 03/16/25, and 05/18/25) reviewed during a look back period from 01/01/25 to 09/14/25 for weekend coverage. The facility failed to have RN coverage in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 01/12/25, 01/25/25, 01/26/25, 02/22/25, 02/23/25, 03/01/25, 03/02/25, 03/08/25, 03/09/25, 03/15/25, 03/16/25, and 05/18/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and improper care.Findings included:Record review of facility RN Coverage, period from 01/04/25 to 09/14/25, reflected the following: - Sunday 01/12/25 - No RN - Saturday 01/25/25 - Time in 18:00 (6:00 PM) - Out Time 23:00 (11:00 PM); Time in 23:30 (11:30 PM) - Out time 6:15 AM (01/26/25 Sunday). 5 hours and 30 minutes were worked on 01/25/25 Saturday. - Sunday 01/26/25 - Time in 18:00 (6:00 PM) -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater for two of three staff LVN B and MA E which resulted in a 17.95% medication error rate after 39 opportunities with 7 errors for three of five residents (Residents#4, #10 and #59) observed for medication pass. 1.The facility failed to ensure MA E administered the correct eye drop for Resident #59 at 07:46 AM. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA E administered Dextromethorphan-Guaifenesin Oral Tablet 20-400 MG (Dextromethorphan-Guaifenesin) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for cough for Resident #4 at 07:46 AM. 3. LVN B failed to follow the physician orders for flushing Resident #10's gastrostomy tube with 10 mL (or prescribed amount) of water between medications when he administered medication, failed to administer all the medications by gravity, and failed to check gastrostomy tube placement before medication administration at 08:46 AM. These failures could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (Nurses' medication cart for Hall 200) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the nurses' medication cart for 200 halls did not contain medications that were expired. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions. Findings included:Observation on 09/17/2025 11:49 AM, revealed the nurses' medication cart for 200 Hall with LVN K had the following medication that had expired. 1. 1 packet Midodrine 2.5mgs tablets with use by date of 07/23/25 2. 1 packet Ibuprofen 400mgs tablets with use by date of 09/05/25 3. 1 bottle of nitroglycerin 0.4mgs tablet with expiry date 07/20/25 4. 1 packet Meclizine 25mgs with use by 07/16/25 Interview on 09/17/2025 12:17 PM with LVN K revealed it was the responsibility for all nurses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 7 of 7 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy.Findings included:During a confidential resident group interview with seven residents on 09/17/25 at 1:45 PM, the facility arranged for the meeting to be held in an open dining room located next to the facility kitchen and main entrance hall. There were no doors that could be closed to ensure the residents' privacy during the meeting. There were no signs indicating a resident council meeting was being held. During the meeting, staff were observed walking through the main hall while the meeting was in progress and kitchen staff stepping out of the kitchen to grab the tray carts. The seven residents in attendance all reported that their monthly resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing weight loss for Resident #16. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met and not receiving necessary care and services.Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/26/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline), malnutrition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and review the care plan for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for comprehensive care plans timing and revision. The facility failed to revise and review Resident #10's care plan to include his physician orders to have a 70 ml water flush during his tube feedings. This failure could lead to the residents not receiving appropriate hydration intake. Findings included:Record review of Resident #10's MDS assessment reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #10's MDS assessment, dated 08/07/25, reflected Resident #10's BIMS score of 00 indicating resident was not able to complete the interview. Resident #10's MDS indicated he had parenteral/IV feeding and feeding tube while a resident of the facility. His diagnoses included paraplegia (inability to move or control the legs and lower body), contracture of muscle right and left lower leg (muscles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with subsection (a) of this section for the following activities of daily living, hygiene (grooming) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide Resident #67 assistance with nail care. Resident #67 nails were observed to be about half inch long with black debris under nails on both hands. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth and infection. Findings included:Record review of Resident #67's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/02/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted [DATE]. Resident #67 had cognition intact with a BIMS score of 99 (indicating he was not able to complete interview). Resident #67 was dependent on staff with shower/bathe self, and personal hygiene. Active diagnosis included Non- Alzheimer's Dementia (memory loss), bipolar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, based upon the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #52) reviewed for wounds. The facility failed to follow physician orders for the treatment of the surgical wound on Resident #52's left foot, to include failing to properly wrap the foot and ensure the nurses initialed and dated the dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to meet their needs. Findings included:Record review of Resident #52's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52 had a BIMS score of 14 indicating his cognition was intact. The assessment reflected Resident #52 had a surgical wound with treatments that included pressure reducing device for bed, turning/repositioning program,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for tube feeding management.The facility failed to label and date Resident #10's tube feeding formula and water bags to indicate when the feeding was started.This failure could place residents receiving tube feedings at risk of gastrointestinal disturbances (relating to the stomach and the intestines), and bacterial infection. Findings included:Record review of Resident #10's MDS quarterly assessment, dated 08/07/25, reflected Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #10's MDS assessment reflected Resident #10's BIMS score of 00 indicating resident was not able to complete the interview. Resident #10's MDS indicated he had parenteral/IV feeding and feeding tube while a resident of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #4 and #52) reviewed for infection control during medication administration. MA E failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Resident #4 and Resident #52. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart failure (a serious condition but not the same as a heart attack, where blood flow to the heart is suddenly blocked). He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's one and only kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the four steamtable compartments in the kitchen were clean and free of debris before food was placed in them.This failure could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination. Findings included:Observation on 07/09/25 at 9:10 AM of the facility's only kitchen revealed the four steamtable compartments had food and debris floating in them.Observation on 07/09/25 at 11:00 AM of the facility's only kitchen revealed the four steamtable compartments had food and debris floating in them. The steamtables had the following: the first one had a tray of sausage jambalaya; the second one had capri vegetables and fortified mashed potatoes; the third one had mechanical soft sausage jambalaya and brown gravy;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for 1 (the lunch meal on 07/09/25) of 1 meal reviewed for food and nutrition services.The facility did not serve the posted lunch menu of cornbread and seasoned okra. This failure could affect all residents in the facility, who eat from the kitchen, by placing them at risk of not knowing what was going to be served for that meal. Findings included:Observation on 07/09/25 at 10:15 AM of the menu posted in the dining room reflected for 07/09/25 the following: Sausage Jambalaya, Seasoned Okra, Cornbread, and a Brownie.Review of the facility's Week-At-A-Glance 2025 Week 3 for Wednesday reflected the following: Sausage Jambalaya, Seasoned Okra, Cornbread, Double Chocolate Brownie.Interview on 07/09/25 at 10:40 AM with Resident #1 revealed when he received his food, he was not sure what would be served because the menu did not match what was served to him often. Interview on 07/09/25 at 10:45 AM with Resident #2 revealed when she received her food, she was not sure what would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure MAs and nurses were following physician orders for administering Resident #1's Lidocaine Patch 4%, which was used for preventing pain, on 05/04/25. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/24/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (a condition where bone density and mass decrease significantly due to the natural aging process, increasing the risk of fractures). The resident's cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 5 of 40 residents (Residents #3, #5, #8, #9, and #10) and one unit reviewed for a clean environment. 1. The facility failed to keep the Memory Care Unit was free of offensive odors. 2. The facility failed to ensure Residents #3, #5, #8, #9, and #10 rooms were kept in a sanitary and comfortable manner. This failure could place the residents at risk of exposure to infectious material and decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Observation on 02/27/25 at 10:00 AM revealed upon entry to the Memory Care Unit there was a urine odor throughout the unit. Two housekeepers were cleaning rooms on the unit. Observation on 02/27/25 from 10:00 AM-10:30 AM Residents #3, #5, #8, #9, and #10 rooms had dead bugs, food particles, dirt, and debris at the head of the beds and between the bed and the wall. Observation on 02/27/25 at 10:30 AM a third housekeeper and the Housekeeping Supervisor joined the other two housekeepers in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #12's debit card when it was taken by CNA I. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The noncompliance began on 09/18/24 and ended on 09/18/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the abbreviated survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of property. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included diabetes, multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system), and anxiety disorder. The resident had a BIMS score of 14 which indicated her cognition was intact. Record review of the facility's Provider…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and misappropriation for 1 of 2 incidents (Resident #6) reviewed for reporting. 1. The facility failed to implement its policy by ensuring LVN Z and CNA V reported an incident of resident-to-resident abuse immediately to the Administrator, who was the Abuse Coordinator, on 01/21/25 when Resident #7 pushed Resident #6, causing her to fall and sustain a pelvic fracture. 2. The Administrator failed to investigate an incident of abuse when Resident #6 was pushed by Resident #7 on 01/21/25 and sustained a pelvic fracture. 3. The Administrator failed to report to HHSC when Resident #7 pushed Resident #6 causing Resident #6 to sustain a pelvic fracture. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of continued abuse. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Identifying Types of Abuse policy, revised September 2022, reflected: 1. Abuse of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were immediately report, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials including the State Survey Agency (HHSC) in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse. 1. LVN Z and CNA V failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident abuse immediately to the Administrator, who was the Abuse Coordinator, on 01/21/25 when Resident #7 pushed Resident #6, causing her to fall and sustain a pelvic fracture. 2. The Administrator failed to report to HHSC within 2 hours of Resident #6 being pushed by Resident #6 causing her to sustain a pelvic fracture. The failure could place residents at risk of serious harm or neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/27/25, reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse allegations. The Administrator failed to investigate an incident of abuse when Resident #6 was pushed by Resident #7 on 01/21/25 and sustained a pelvic fracture. This failure could place residents at risk of harm and injuries related to abuse and a delay in investigating. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 02/27/25, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #6's significant change in status MDS Assessment, dated 01/29/25, reflected she had a BIMS score of 06, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her MDS indicated she had delusions but no other behaviors. Her diagnoses included unspecified fracture of sacrum and depression. Record review of Resident #6's care plan, revised 01/22/25, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to equip rooms to assure full visual privacy for each resident for 4 of 20 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for privacy curtains. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4 had full visual privacy. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure while care was being provided. Findings included: Observation on 02/27/25 from 10:00 AM-10:30 AM of the Memory Care Unit revealed Resident #1's room had a privacy curtain that would not extend around the bed due to damage of the track. Residents #2, #3, and #4 had no privacy curtain at all. Residents were not in their rooms, staff kept residents in the dining area for observation. Residents were unable to give interviews. Interview on 02/27/25 at 12:27 AM with the Housekeeping Supervisor revealed her Floor Tech was responsible for changing out privacy curtains when they were soiled or damaged. If the track was damaged, then maintenance would have to fix the track. She stated the reason the curtains were needed was to provide each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 5 of 40 residents (Residents #3, #5, #8, #9, and #10) reviewed for effective pest control. The facility failed to ensure Residents #3, #5, #8, #9, and #10 rooms were free of pests. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to bugs and bug bites. Findings included: Observation on 02/27/25 from 10:00 AM-10:30 AM revealed Resident #5's bathroom had two live cockroaches. Residents # 3, #8, #9, and #10 had dead cockroaches and other bugs at the head of their beds between the bed and the wall. Record review of the facility's Pest Control log revealed cockroaches had been reported every month since May 2024. Pest control had treated for cockroaches every month. The last visit was on 02/20/25. Interview on 02/27/25 at 5:04 PM with the Director of Plant Operations revealed bugs in the facility was an on-going problem. He stated it was an older building with multiple means of entry for bugs. He stated their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 (Residents #22 and #47) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. RN D failed to maintain Resident #22 and #47's dignity and respect by standing between the residents while feeding both of them during lunch time on 08/27/24 at 12:17 PM . The failure could negatively affect the mental and psychological well-being of all residents who required the assistance of staff with eating. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 08/29/2024 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (most common type of dementia), lack of coordination, dysphasia (language disorder marked by deficiency in the generation of speech), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the service of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 5 of 30 days (05/25/2024, 05/26/2024, 06/01/2024, 06/08/2024, and 06/15/2024) reviewed during a look back period from 05/25/2024 to 08/25/2024 for weekend coverage. The facility failed to have RN coverage in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 05/25/2024, 05/26/2024, 06/01/2024, 06/08/2024, and 06/15/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their nursing and medical needs met and improper care. Findings included: Review of the facility's Time Detail Reports from 05/25/2024 to 08/25/2024 reflected the following: - RN C worked from 6:00 PM to 10:00 PM (4 total hours), clocked out for lunch, then resumed work from 10:30 PM to 12:00 AM (1.5 total hours) on 05/25/2024. RN E worked from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM, clocked out for lunch, then resumed work from 11:30 PM to 12:00 AM (.5 total hours) on 05/25/2024. RN D worked from 6:00 PM to 11:00 PM, clocked out for lunch, then resumed work from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 1 steamtable reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: Cook A placed food containers, of the lunch meal in a steamtable that contained contaminated tinted water and burnt food particles floating in it on 08/28/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 08/28/2024 at 10:58 AM of the kitchen's steamtable revealed six compartments total, but the first and sixth from the left were not being used and had no water in them. [NAME] A placed hamburger steaks and gravy in the second compartment from the left side that had a few inches of dark brown tinted water in it as well as burnt food particles floating in it. [NAME] A placed pinto beans, pureed pinto beans, and pureed cabbage in the third compartment from the left side that also had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #239) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #239's code status (advance directives) was accurate and consistent with all records at the facility and did not provide information to the resident related to her right to formulate an advance directive. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored. Findings included: Record review of Resident #239's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #239's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The resident's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (chronic disease of the central nervous system), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder) and hyperkalemia (high potassium). Record review of Resident #239's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every three months for 1 of 5 (Resident #80) residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility failed to complete Resident #80's Quarterly MDS Assessment within three months of their most recent comprehensive assessment. This failure could lead to residents not receiving care required for their individualized needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #80's admission Record dated 08/29/2024 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #80's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11. Her diagnoses included diabetes (a chronic disease that affects how the body uses insulin and glucose), hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights as set forth at 483.10(c) and 483.10(c)3, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of eight residents (Resident #239) for care plan revisions, in that: The facility failed to develop a care plan addressing Resident #239's elected code status or advance directive. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #239's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #239's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident's cognition was intact with a BIMS score of 15. The resident's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (chronic disease of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge was available for release to authorized persons and agencies, with consent of the resident or resident's representative for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary after Resident #87 left the facility and did not return. This failure could place residents at risk for a lack of continued care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #87's face sheet dated 08/29/2024 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He discharged from the facility on 08/08/2024 to his home. Record review of Resident #87's most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected he had diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings between emotional highs and lows) and alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (medication cabinet in the central supplies unit) and one refrigerator in the medication room for 100 and 200 halls reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired influenza vaccine, with an expiration date of 05/10/2024, in the Hall 100/200 Medication Room refrigerator and expired medications in the Central Supply medication cabinet were removed and destroyed on 08/28/2024 at 10:45 AM. The failure placed residents at risk of receiving medications that were ineffective due to having expired. Findings included: Observation on 08/29/2024 at 10:45 AM of the 100 and 200 Medication Room refrigerators with LVN K revealed 4 vials of the influenza vaccine lot 370677 with expiration date of 05/10/2024. Interview on 08/29/2024 at 10:55 AM, LVN K stated the night shift nurses were the ones who were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Residents #2) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. LVN L failed to put on a gown before entering Resident #2's room to administer a bolus feeding and medications to Resident #2, who was on enhanced barrier precautions. This failure placed residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08/29/2024 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected his diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy status (presence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices based on the comprehensive assessment of residents for three of six residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care for Residents #1, #2, and #3. The failure placed residents at risk of wound deterioration and infection. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's closed clinical record reflected a face sheet, dated 08/22/24, indicating the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified fracture of upper end of left humerus (the bone of the upper arm forming joints at the shoulder and the elbow), metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that occurs when a chemical imbalance in the blood affects the brain), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, administering for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services in that: LVN A failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of the medication lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) and hydrocodone (a pain medication) to Resident #1 on 09/04/23. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by their physician. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/02/23, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry) and primary osteoarthritis (a condition that causes several different symptoms that can impact your function and affect your ability to perform your daily activities). Review of Resident #1's Significant Change in Status MDS, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of five residents records reviewed for resident records, in that: LVN A failed to accurately document the administration of Resident #1's hydrocodone and lorazepam on 09/04/23 on the resident's MAR. This failure could affect the residents medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/02/23, reflected the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder (a group of mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry) and primary osteoarthritis (a condition that causes several different symptoms that can impact your function and affect your ability to perform your daily activities). Review of Resident #1's Significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for daily living for two residents (Resident #24 and Resident #5) of eighteen residents reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. Resident #24's and Resident #5's room had a foul odor, the floor was sticky with debris, and the toilet was covered in feces. The two residents shared a room. 2. There was a pervasive foul odor on the Memory Care Unit (300 Hall). These failures could place residents at risk of living with unclean, uncomfortable, un-homelike rooms and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia behavioral disturbance (loss of memory and thinking abilities), Type II diabetes, Parkinson's disease (nervous system disorder), anorexia (eating disorder), and atrial fibrillation (irregular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-22 · tag F0914 — pattern
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure total privacy for residents in 6 (Rooms 303 A bed, 304 B bed, 306 A bed, 307 A bed, 308 B bed and 309 A bed) of 19 rooms reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to provide curtains to ensure resident's privacy in Rooms 303 A bed, 304 B bed, 306 A bed, 307 A bed, 308 B bed and 309 A bed. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased self-worth by being exposed during resident care. Findings included: Observation and interview on 06/20/23 at 11:09 AM of room [ROOM NUMBER] (A bed) revealed the resident, who resided in this room, was sitting in her chair watching television. Further observation revealed there was not a privacy curtain available to surround the A bed, which was nearest the door. The resident stated she wished she had a privacy curtain in her room so she could have privacy when she wanted it. She stated she had been at the facility for a while and had never had a privacy curtain for her bed. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure the Stage 4 pressure ulcer on Resident #32's sacrum was covered with a dressing as ordered by the physician. This failure could affect the residents, who received pressure ulcer care, by placing them at risk for contamination of their wounds and causing unnecessary infections and worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings included: Record review of Resident #32's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, unstageable pressure ulcer on right hip (refers to an ulcer that has full thickness tissue loss but is either covered by extensive necrotic tissue or by an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (5%) or greater on 3 errors of 33 opportunities for errors leading to 9.09% medication error rates for one (LVN B) of two staff observed for medication pass. The facility failed to ensure LVN B administered all the crushed medication in the medication cups without leaving residue for Resident #2. These failures resulted in a 9.09% medication error rate and could put residents at risk who received medications via g-tube for not receiving the correct dose of medication and getting intended therapy. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included difficulty in swallowing, oropharyngeal phase (middle part of the throat), and gastrostomy status (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall made surgically). Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$29,614 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $14,917 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
  • $14,697 — penalty dated 2024-07-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BELLVILLE HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2025
1500 AUTUMN DRIVE PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER INCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2025
1500 AUTUMN DRIVE OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
HAIDER, MUNAWARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
DAVIS, LAURAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$106K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 3%Other / private 7%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $106K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,147per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675905. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next