Avir at Orem

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (CR #1) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure CR #1 received hemodialysis since she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. CR #1 missed dialysis on Saturday 2/10/24 and Tuesday 2/13/24. CR #1 was sent to the hospital on 2/14/24 with signs of altered mental status, increased confusion, and lethargy. The facility failed to document monitoring of CR #1's dialysis port (access site used when blood is transported from the body for cleaning) The facility failed to obtain a signed contract with CR #1's dialysis center. An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 2/16/24 at 12:26 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 2/17/24 at 12:43 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit accurate, encoded, complete MDS assessments to the CMS system within 13 days for 4 of 18 residents records reviewed for MDS transmission (Residents # 2, 6, 13). -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's, annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was transmitted within 14 days -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's, annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was transmitted within 14 days -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #13's, annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was transmitted within 14 days These failures put residents at risk of not having their assessments completed timely which could result in denial of services or denial of payment for services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/02/26 revealed Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included the End stage renal diseases (Organs lose ability to filter waste), type 2 diabetes body inability to process glucose),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in that - The facility failed to ensure that the vVent hood above the stove was free of grease build up. The facility failed to ensure that frozen meat was properly thaw under running These failures placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and accident. Findings included: Kitchen observation, and interview with the Dietary Manager on 06/02/26 at 8:30am, revealed Dietary Aide K washing her hands in one side of 2 compartment sink and on the other side were 2-10lbs of frozen grand ground beef was in a pan of standing water. During an interview theThe Dietary Manager said the staff was supposed to wash her hands in one of the handing washing sink in the kitchen and not in the food preparation sink. She said all frozen food was are supposed to be thawed in a bowl under running water to prevent bacteria growth. Observation of the vent hood above the stove and interview with the Dietary Manager, revealed the vent hood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed did not implement policies and procedures to ensure the resident's medical record includes documentation of receiving or refusal of influenza or pneumococcal immunization for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident#2, Resident #3, Resident #11, Resident #60, and Resident #84). The facility failed to implement their influenza and pneumococcal immunization policies to document evidence in the electronic medical record the offering or the refusal of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization status for Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #11. The facility failed to implement their pneumococcal immunization policy to document evidence in the electronic medical record the offering or the refusal of the pneumococcal immunization status for Resident #60 and Resident #84. The failures could place residents at risk of contracting viral illness, influenza or pneumococcal disease, or of not being informed of the benefits and risk which could cause…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement policy and procedures to ensure residents were offered, received, or refused the Covid-19 immunization, for 5 of 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #11, Resident #60 and Resident #84) who were reviewed for immunization compliance. The facility failed to develop a Covid-19 immunization policy that addressed the documentation in Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #11, Resident #60 and Resident #84's electronic medical records for having received or not receiving the Covid-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of not being informed of complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6/4/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unspecified cerebral infarction(a condition where a blood clot blocks a blood vessel in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and timetable to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident # 105). --Resident # 105 did not have a care plan for ADLs. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs identified and addressed. Reord review of Resident # 105's admission record revealed admission date 10/4/24 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), chronic kidney disease (inability of kidneys to filter waste from the body), heart disease (condition affecting heart structure, function, vessels), heart failure (inability of heart muscle to pump blood), Diabetes (imbalance of glucose in the blood), embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for mental illness, disability, or developmental disability.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, who had a positive PL1, had a PL2 completed.This failure could place residents at risk of mental health needs not being met. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 5/6/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility originally on 11/18/2020 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Cerebral infarction (the most common type of stroke; occurs when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked, cutting off oxygen supply to brain tissue), ESRD (a condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Metoprolol (a blood pressure (BP) medication given to lower high blood pressure) was administered six times in March 2025 to Resident #51 as ordered on 02/26/2025 by the physician and Resident #51 was administered Metoprolol 12.5 mg outside of physician set parameter of the residents SBP (the top BP number) less than 100 hold. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving desired therapeutic outcomes, increased side effects, or a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #51's admission face sheet, undated, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Atrial Fibrillation (irregular often rapid heart rate resulted in poor blood flow), Hypertension (high blood pressure),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA C followed proper infection control, glove changes and hand hygiene for Resident #40 during incontinent care. CNA C failed to use a clean wipe, change gloves and perform hand hygiene during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of infection or a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of Resident #40's admission face sheet undated revealed a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #40 was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #40's diagnoses included: hemiplegia /hemiparesis ( muscles weakness or partial paralysis to one side of the body),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the event, if the events result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events do not result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. CNA A failed to immediately notify the Administrator on 09/03/24 Resident #1 had bruising on the right arm of unknown origin. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings Included: Record review of admission record dated 02/27/25 revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified visual loss, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living for one of five residents (Resident #2) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide Resident #2, who required extensive assistance, with timely incontinence care on 02/25/25 from 6:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, urinary tract infections and loss of dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 02/27/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 07/22/22. Resident #2 diagnoses included Paraplegia (paralysis that affects all or part of the trunk, legs, and pelvic organs), Flaccid Hemiplegia affection left nondominant side (loss of muscle tone on one side of the body), need for assistance with personal care, and muscle wasting and atrophy (causes muscles to lose mass and strength). Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,418 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $34,418 — penalty dated 2024-02-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX