No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir At Jefferson

1307 Martin Luther King Dr, Jefferson, TX 75657 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (903) 665-3951 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 665-3951 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$16,498 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,498 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
219 N Polk St · (903) 665-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
109 W Lafayette St · (903) 665-2521 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
404 E Broadway St
Park
500 E Broadway St · (903) 319-5312 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1008 N Alley St · (903) 665-2387

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.8%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.2%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.4%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.8%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.492.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.992.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.1%CMS range 30.7–55.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.7–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.9–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
58.8%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 85.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-03)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, pain management services for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain. (Resident #1) Resident #1 complained of pain in her heel prior to wound care. She complained of pain during the wound care treatment and at no time was the wound care held or pain medications offered. Review of Resident #1's physician orders indicated she did not have any PRN pain medications ordered. This failure caused the resident to experience pain during wound care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/23/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses was diabetes, muscle wasting and difficulty walking. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #1 did not have pressure injuries when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility has failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair brakes were functioning correctly to prevent a fall in her bathroom which resulted in a fracture. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accidents and hazards. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/19/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness, history of falling, age-related cognitive decline (experience of worsening or more frequent confusion or memory loss), age related osteoporosis (is a bone disease that develops when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative and physician when there were changes in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for notification of changes.The facility failed to notify MD E of Resident #2 refusing meals and eating poorly during the month of 2/2026.The facility failed to notify MD E of Resident #2 being combative and refusing medications on 2/15/26.The facility failed to notify Resident #2's RP of his poor oral intake and refusing to eat the month of 2/2026.The facility failed to notify Resident #2's RP of him being combative and refusing his medications on 2/15/26.These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate and timely interventions and a decline in condition. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 2/20/26 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] initially and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans.1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and implemented for Resident #1's allergies, discharge plans, code status, cognitive status, incontinence status, activities, pain management, diet, ADL assistance required, risk for falls, risk for pressure ulcers, risk for bleeding, preferences, disease processes: hypertension, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, nutritional deficiency, heart disease, or polyneuropathy, and medications: antianxiety, opioid, antiplatelet, anticonvulsant, diuretics and antidepressant.2. The facility failed to update Resident #2's ADL care plan to show he was dependent on staff for eating.3. The facility failed to implement Resident #2's order of: may have health shake if resident consumes less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility did not ensure: 1. Meat was thawing in the appropriate container and sink under constant flow of cool, running water during the initial tour on 02/26/2024.2. A container which held a thick pink liquid was labeled and dated. 3. A box of frozen biscuits, a box of frozen corn, a plastic bag of cheese, and a plastic bag of chicken nuggets were sealed appropriately in the refrigerator. 4. The potato freezer was free of rust on the bottom shelf inside the freezer. 5. The juice tubing was kept off the ground. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and food-borne illness. The findings included: During an initial tour observation in the kitchen on 12/01/25 beginning at 8:05 AM, revealed the following:1. There was an open box of frozen biscuits and frozen corn in the vegetable freezer.2. There was a container which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 12 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #60) The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of Resident #60 by standing over the resident while feeding her, being on a personal cell phone while feeding the resident and not speaking to the resident during the meal. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased self-esteem, decreased privacy and decreased quality of life.Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #60 was ana [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of major depressive disorder (depressed mood for at least two weeks or more, and a loss of interest or pleasure in everyday activities), protein calorie malnutrition (nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 dining room and 3 of 22 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #18, Resident #40, and Resident #57) 1. The facility failed to repair wall damage in the rooms of Resident #18, Resident #40, and Resident #57 in a timely manner. 2. The facility failed to repair peeling wallpaper above the bed of Resident #40. 3. The facility failed to repair a leaking skylight, clean two vents, and missing texture in the ceiling of the dining room. These failures could place residents at risk of an uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. During an observation on 12/01/25 at 12:16 p.m., it was raining heavily outside. There was water dripping into a bucket sitting on a table from a skylight in the dining room. There was a puddle of water under the table approximately 8 inches by 11 inches. There was a discolored area around the drip. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for ADL care (Residents #3). The facility did not bathe Resident #3 from 11/19/2025 to 12/02/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs, feelings of poor self-esteem, and lack of dignity and health.Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was a 77- year-old-male, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diabetes type II (a chronic condition where the body doesn't use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels, atrial fibrillation (common type of irregular and often rapid heart rhythm where the upper chambers of the heart quiver instead of beating effectively), and insomnia (common type of irregular and often rapid heart rhythm where the upper chambers of the heart quiver instead of beating effectively). Record review of an admission MDS assessment, dated 09/24/2025, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive for 3 of 5 residents (Resident's #3, #16, and #75) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive to Resident #3, #16, and #75 who complained the food was served cool and bland. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was an 77- year-old-male, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diabetes type II (a chronic condition where the body doesn't use insulin properly, leading to high blood sugar levels, atrial fibrillation (common type of irregular and often rapid heart rhythm where the upper chambers of the heart quiver instead of beating effectively), and insomnia (common type of irregular and often rapid heart rhythm where the upper chambers of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for medical records. (Resident #52.) 1. The facility did not ensure resident records were free from unauthorized use due to staff not having their own individual login for the (EHR). 2. The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation was entered for Resident #52 related to her diabetes management and wound care. These failures could place residents at risk for inaccuracy of clinical records and the decrease continuity of resident care. Findings included:Record review of Resident #52 face sheet date 12/01/2025 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with the primary diagnosis of Acute embolism and thrombosis of popliteal vein (blood clot forms in the popliteal veins located behind the knees, blocking blood flow), being treated postoperatively. Resident #52 has a medical history including type 2 diabetes mellites (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #81 and Resident #83) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the LVN L followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (interventions to prevent spread of infection in high-risk residents) policy of wearing a gown during Resident #81's catheter assessment on 12/1/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ADON followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy of wearing a gown and gloves during an observation of Resident #81's catheter bag on 12/2/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA J followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy of wearing a gown during Resident #83's catheter care on 12/2/2025.These failures could place residents at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the option he or she prefers for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident #11) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had a signed psychotropic consent form for Haldol and Zyprexa (antipsychotic medications). 2. The facility did not ensure the need for, and benefits of, the proposed treatment with antipsychotic or neuroleptic medication was filled out on the HHSC Form 1012 Consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic Medication.These failures could place residents at risk for treatment or services provided without their informed consent Record review of an undated face sheet dated revealed Resident #11 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophreniform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. (Resident #8) The facility failed to accurately document restraint usage for Resident #8. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services. Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #8 was a 100- year-old- female, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), anemia (a condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function). Record review of a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], for Resident #8 revealed a BIMS of 05, which indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #8 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission. This failure could affect residents by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 12/03/25, reflected Resident #55 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of extradural and subdural abscess (buildup of pus from an infection located in the brain), acute on chronic heart failure (chronic, progressive disease in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to oxygenate the body), and COPD (chronic lung condition in which the lungs are damaged). Record review of the admission MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had a urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care. (Resident #81).The facility failed to ensure Resident # 81's securement device was in place to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site on 12/1/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services needed to address catheter care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #81's face sheet dated 12/2/2025 indicated Resident #81 was a [AGE] year-old, male and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a medical condition characterized by the interruption of blood supply to the brain), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with other forms of angina pectoris (characterized by the buildup of plaque in the coronary arteries, leading to narrowed or blocked arteries which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the PICC line site was maintained consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for central venous lines (a thin, flexible tube that's inserted into a large vein to provide access to the circulatory system). The facility failed to change a PICC line (a type of central venous line) dressing, consistent with physician's orders for Resident #83. This failure could place residents at risk of a systemic infection that could lead to serious illness and/or death. Record review of a face sheet dated 12/02/25 revealed Resident #83 was a [AGE] year-old male and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis due to Escherichia Coli (a life-threatening condition caused by the body's extreme response to an E. coli (a type of bacteria) infection), muscle wasting, and lack of coordination. Record review of a progress note dated 11/21/25 at 10:11 p.m. indicated Resident #83 had returned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 22 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #10) The facility failed to properly store Resident #10's oxygen mask while not in use by the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory complications or respiratory infection. 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 12/04/25 indicated Resident #10 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (a life-threatening condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or remove enough carbon dioxide from the blood), tracheostomy status (an opening in the neck to the windpipe, or trachea, through which a tube is inserted to provide an airway), and history of cardiac arrest (is when the heart suddenly stops beating effectively due to electrical problems, cutting off blood flow to the body ). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and reviews, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for (DRR) Drug Regimen Review. The facility failed to complete a psychotropic consent form for Resident #11 after the pharmacist recommended the form was needed on 11/10/2025 for Haldol (antipsychotic mediation) and Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication). This failure could place residents at risk residents of not having a drug regiment that is appropriate for their needs.Record review of an undated face sheet dated revealed Resident #11 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophreniform disorder (a psychotic disorder characterized by symptoms similar to schizophrenia, such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized speech, but its duration is shorter, lasting from one to six months) psychotic disorder (a severe mental health condition characterized by a loss of contact with reality, resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: 1. Dietary Manager not properly securing facial hair. 2. Particles on top of dishwasher. 3. Grease buildup on the left side of gas stove and grease [NAME]. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. During an observation on 9/16/2024 at 8:55 AM, the dietary manager was not wearing proper facial covering upon entry into the kitchen. During an observation on 9/17/2024 at 8:19 AM, the dietary manager was not wearing facial covering. During an observation and interview on 9/18/2024 at 9:50 AM, Dietary Aide A said everyone should be wearing hair covering while entering the kitchen. She said males should have their facial hair covered and no hair should be sticking out of the hair net.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #8, Resident #48, and Resident #190) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to change the oxygen tubing for Resident #8. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's nasal cannula humidification bottle (aids in preventing a patient's airways from becoming dry) had water in it. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q performed Resident #190's tracheostomy care using aseptic technique per the facility's policy. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q performed Resident #190's tracheostomy care and cleaning per the facility's policy. 5. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q used the prescribed solution to clean Resident #190's tracheostomy site. These failures could place residents at risk for of respiratory infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 of 24 residents (Resident #7, Resident #17, and Resident #50) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7, Resident #17, and Resident #50's call button was within reach while in bed. These failures could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 4/19/24 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Pneumonia (a lung infection that causes the air sacs in the lungs to fill with fluid or pus, which can make breathing difficult and painful), Dementia (a group of conditions that cause a gradual decline in cognitive abilities, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and Hypertension (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that that all alleged violations involving a drug diversion were reported after the allegation was made to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 4 resident reviewed for drug diversion in that: The facility was made aware of a possible drug diversion on 07/12/2024. LVN M reported to the ADM receiving a bottle of hydromorphone from Hospice Nurse N that was tampered with upon receipt of the medication. This failure could result in allegations or instances of resident drug diversion not being reported or investigated by the state survey agency. Findings include: Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), COPD (A group of lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #2, Resident #36, and Resident #190). The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #36 within 48 hours of admission. The facility failed to provide Resident #2 and Resident #190's RP, a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 09/16/24 indicated Resident #36 was an 85-years-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 09/04/24 with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of left femur (is a break in the uppermost part of thighbone, next to the hip joint), Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 26 residents reviewed for care plans.(Resident #30 and Resident #43). 1. The care plan for Resident #30 failed to address his Stage IV sacral pressure ulcer. 2. The care plan for Resident #43 failed to address new interventions and updates for fall prevention. Theses failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the necessary care or having important care needs identified. Findings include: 1. Record review of an undated face sheet indicated Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of spinal stenosis (condition in which the spinal canal narrows and puts pressure on the nerve root) and dementia (a group of conditions that can cause gradual decline in cognitive abilities), and diabetes mellitus. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers based on the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #36 and Resident #187) whose record were reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 and Resident #187's pressure-relieving mattress (is designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) was on the correct settings. This failure could place residents at risk for developing and/or worsening of pressure ulcers Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 09/16/24 indicated Resident #36 was an [AGE] year-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 09/04/24 with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of left femur (is a break in the uppermost part of thighbone, next to the hip joint), Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) resistance (is an enzyme…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra (is a hollow tube that lets urine leave your body)). The facility failed to ensure LVN Q documented Resident #2 had red-tinged urine (a urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common causes of blood in your urine) in his indwelling catheter (drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body). The facility failed to ensure LVN Q reported to LVN M that Resident #2 had red-tinged urine in his indwelling catheter. The facility failed to ensure LVN Q reported to MD T Resident #2's red-tinged urine after Resident #2 had reported increased confusion and elevated white blood cell count. These failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of 1 of 7 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident #17) Facility staff left Resident #17's medications at the bedside. These deficient practices could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dosage and drug diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 1/4/24 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Systolic Heart Failure (occurs when the left ventricle of the heart is too weak to pump enough blood to the body), Hypertensive Herat Disease (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left atrium, and coronary arteries as a result of chronic blood pressure elevation), Old Myocardial Infarction (a previous heart attack that's detected by an electrocardiogram (ECG) as pathologic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #287) reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility failed to have an appropriate diagnosis or indication of use for Resident #287's Quetiapine (antipsychotic). These failures could put residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 9/17/2024 indicated Resident # 287 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) , atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #36) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36 Levothyroxine (is used to treat hypothyroidism, a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) and Pantoprazole (is used to treat heartburn and certain other conditions caused by too much acid in the stomach) were scheduled and administered for optimal therapeutic effect (is a consequence of the medical treatment of any kind, the results of which are judged to be desirable and beneficial). This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's face sheet dated 09/16/24 indicated Resident #36 was an 85-years-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and 09/04/24 with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (a condition where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly transferred in bed by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accident and hazards. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 07/30/24 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), and age-related osteoporosis (a condition that causes bone to become weak and brittle). Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was sometimes understood and sometimes understood others.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe sanitary and comfortable environment and to prevent the development of infections for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for infections. (Residents #1, #3, #4, and #5) The Treatment Nurse did not wash her hands while providing wound treatments for Residents #1, #3, #4, and #5. The treatment nurse did not change her gloves between dirty and clean wounds for Resident #1. The Treatment Nurse did not change gloves from one wound to the next wound during Resident #5's wound treatments. This negative finding had the potential to cause infections. Finding included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/23/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes, muscle wasting and difficulty walking. Record review of Resident #1's computerized physician order dated 4/23/24 indicated an order dated 4/19/24 to cleanse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 of 2 resident (Resident#1) reviewed safe, functional equipment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair brakes were functioning correctly. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries and falls. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/19/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness, history of falling, age-related cognitive decline (experience of worsening or more frequent confusion or memory loss), age related osteoporosis (is a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the quality or structure of bone changes) without current pathological fracture (a complete or partial break in a bone), muscle wasting and atrophy (shortening), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were properly labeled and dated. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: During an observation of the kitchen refrigerators on 08/14/23 at 09:05AM these items were found: *1 container of black-eyed peas marked with a date of 8-9 *1 container of brown gravy marked with a date of 8-9 *1 container of sausage marked with a date of 8-6 *1 container of bacon, not labelled with a name or date *1 container of celery marked with a date of 8-9 *1 container of mandarin oranges marked with a date of 8-9 During an interview on 08/14/23 at 9:10AM, the Dietary Manager said the dates on the food items in the fridge were the date they were prepared and placed in the refrigerator. She said most items were good for 3 days and then they throw them out. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care and provide the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan that included goals of the resident, summary of medications and dietary instructions, and services and treatments for 5 of 10 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (Resident #238, Resident #240, Resident #339, Resident #388, and Resident #389) 1.The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan with initial goals and the minimum healthcare information necessary to provide person-centered care for Resident #238, Resident #240, Resident #339, Resident #388, and Resident #389. 2.The facility failed to provide a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan to the resident and his representative. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity and care for them in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for resident rights in the memory care unit. (Resident #60) The facility failed to treat Residents #60 with respect and dignity when she had to wait 15 minutes to receive her lunch tray after the other resident at her table had already been served their meal and been eating in front of her. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increase anxiety. Findings included: Record review of Resident #60's face sheet dated 8/15/23 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #60 had diagnoses of dementia (forgetfulness), diabetes (elevated blood sugar), and heart failure. Record review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 call light was within reach. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had an alternative means to get assistance due to her visual impairment. The facility failed to collaborate with Resident #11 and Resident #11's responsible party to ensure her environment accommodated her visual impairment. These failures could place residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/14/23 indicated Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbance (is a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), Parkinson's disease (is a brain disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment 1 of 17 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #48) The facility failed to repair the wall mounted bathroom toilet paper dispenser of Resident #48. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe or uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet 08/14/23 indicated Resident #48 was an [AGE] year old female and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychotic disturbance (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), major depressive disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), hyperlipidemia (an elevated level of lipids - like cholesterol and triglycerides - in your blood), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #239, Resident #11, Resident #43) 1. The facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #239 by not having a fall mat at the bedside. 2. The facility failed to implement Resident #11's care plan to document behavioral monitoring for antidepressant (treats clinical depression), antipsychotic (manage psychosis (disconnect from reality)), and anti-anxiety (treats chronic anxiety) medications. 3. The facility failed to develop a care plan problem for Resident #43 to address behavioral monitoring for Aripiprazole (antipsychotic). These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services Findings include: 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 of 34 residents (Resident #239, Resident #25, Resident #11) reviewed for adequate supervision. 1.The facility failed to place Resident #239's fall mat next to her bed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11, and Resident #25 did not have fall hazards in their room. These failures could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment or death. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #239's admission Record indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), fracture of pelvis, protein calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #388, #82, and #63) reviewed for respiratory care and services. The facility failed to properly store Resident #388's respiratory equipment when not in use. The facility failed to date Resident #388's oxygen tubing and humidifier water bottle. The facility failed to change oxygen tubing every Friday, as ordered by the physician for Resident #82. The facility failed to label/date and properly store Resident #63's nasal cannula/humidifier and nebulizer mask. These failures could place residents at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #388's face sheet dated 8/14/23 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #240) The facility failed to develop a process to communicate, with the dialysis facility, Resident #240 received care and services. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/27/23 indicated Resident #240 was [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (is high blood pressure caused by damage to the kidneys), or end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids). Record review of the MDS revealed Resident #240 was admitted to the facility less than 21 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents #43 and Resident #240) The facility failed to keep in stock medications for Resident #43 and Resident #240. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/16/23 indicated Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (is characterized by predominantly positive symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions and hallucinations), major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (refers to symptoms that happen when a person is disconnected from reality), generalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to accommodate residents' food preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for preference. The facility failed to honor Resident #52's food dislikes. This failure could result in a decrease in resident choices, diminished interest in meals, and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/17/23 indicated Resident #52 was [AGE] year-old male and admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function). Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #52 was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #52 had minimal difficulty hearing, clear speech, and adequate vision with corrective lenses. The MDS indicated Resident #52 had a BIMS of 13 which indicated intact cognition and required supervision for eating. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident #45, Resident #68) The facility failed ensure blood was cleaned from the wall near the bed of Resident #45. The facility failed to ensure that personal protective equipment used in Resident #68's room was thrown away properly and that bloody soiled toilet paper was thrown away. Findings include: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 08/14/23 indicated Resident #45 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), anxiety, and high blood pressure. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was usually understood and usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,498 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,691 — penalty dated 2024-04-23
  • $7,807 — penalty dated 2023-09-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2018
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2018
1307 MARTIN LUTHER KING DR OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
BARBOLLA, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/20/2025
1307 MARTIN LUTHER KING DR PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
KALE, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 9%Other / private 18%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$248per resident / day
operating cost
$7,531per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$255per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next