Avir at Kingsland

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 11.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 72.0 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.78 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 nurses (LVN A) reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to ensure LVN A assessed and performed necessary interventions to stop Resident #1 from bleeding from skin tears on 09/13/25.This failure could place residents with wounds at risk for bleeding related complications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/08/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included shortness of breath, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, chronic pain, hypertension and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that a BIMS interview could not be conducted as she rarely/never understood the interview questions. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 06/08/25 revealed Resident #1 had potential for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 10 of (10/05/25, 10/15/25, 10/18/25, 10/19/25, 10/23/25, 11/01/25, 11/06/25, 11/16/25, 12/27/25 and 12/28/25) of 15 days reviewed for RN coverage.The facility failed to ensure they had an RN coverage for the facility on 10/05/25, 10/15/25, 10/18/25, 10/19/25, 10/23/25, 11/01/25, 11/06/25, 11/16/25, 12/27/25 and 12/28/25.This failure could place residents at risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, care and treatment. Findings included:Review of daily HR total employee hours report (lists total clocked in hours worked daily by staff across all departments) provided by the ADM for the following dates: 10/05/25, 10/15/25, 10/18/25, 10/19/25, 10/23/25, 11/01/25, 11/06/25, 11/16/25, 12/27/25 and 12/28/25 reflected zero RN hours were registered as worked. During an interview on 05/28/26 at 01:24 PM with the DON, she stated she was not the DON during the infraction dates found with no RN coverage and could not speak as to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided and received food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for palatable food. 1. The facility failed to provide meal services in a manner to ensure palatable food served was appetizing to residents.2. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Residents #7, #13, and #28.These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings include:During an interview on 5/26/26 at 8:30 a.m., Resident #7 said the food at the facility was not good. She stated that she rarely eats the food in the facility because it isn't good. She stated that she had to get the backup meal, which is mainly salads. She stated that she has reported the food being a problem. During an interview on 5/26/26 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #13 said the food at the facility was not good. She stated that he rarely ate the food in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1.The facility failed to label and date food correctly. 2.The facility failed to staff properly sanitized their hands while passing out trays during food service on 5-26-2026. 3.The facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen, 4.The facility sanitizes the thermometer while taking the temperatures of food. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included:An observation on 05/26/2026 at 6:48 AM of Refrigerator #1 revealed the following: Juice in a single serve cup was not labeled with the name or date on the tray. Jello in a clear container that was dated 5-25 with no use by date. Ketchup with an open date of 4-20 and no use by date. Cheese in a zip lock bag with no open date and no use by date. Pudding in a single serve container on a tray that was not dated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services.1.The facility failed to obtain a current active consent regarding the risks and benefits of the medications prior to administration of the medication from Resident #2's family representative for the use of Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic) used for agitation/anxiety related to dementia, Depakote ER (extended release) antiepileptic/ antimanic, Buspirone (anti-anxiety), Paroxetine (antidepressant), and donepezil (used for dementia) and failed to have an active diagnosis of anxiety and depression to correspond with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 24 resident (Resident #50 reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure the HK knocked on Resident #50's door when entering their room on 5-26-2026. These failures could place residents at risk of poor self-esteem, and not a home-like environment. Findings include:Record review of Resident #50's face sheet revealed that Resident #50 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #50 had diagnoses that included: Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure (oxygenate the blood), Type 2 Diabetes (body cannot properly use or make enough insulin), Psychotic Disturbance, and Mood Disturbance (mental health disruptions that cause a person to lose touch with reality)Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs without indications for its use for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1) reviewed for the right to be free from chemical restraints.1.The facility failed to obtain a current active consent from Resident #2's family representative for the use of Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic) used for agitation/anxiety related to dementia, Depakote ER (extended release) antiepileptic/ antimanic, Buspirone (anti-anxiety), Paroxetine (antidepressant), and donepezil (used for dementia) and failed to have an active diagnosis of anxiety and depression to correspond with medications prescribed from November 2025 through May 2026.2.The facility failed to have a consent on file for the administration of Quetiapine Fumarate and failed to have a corresponding diagnosis of insomnia or depression for Resident #1. These deficient practices could affect residents who received medications for mood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not experience physical abuse when Resident #1 struck Resident #2 with a cane, resulting in an abrasion on the head on 4/20/26. Findings Included:Resident #1Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia (a function cognitive decline in memory), alcoholic fibrosis and sclerosis of the liver (scaring of the liver tissue), chronic pain, cataracts (a clouding of the lens on the eye affecting vision), and constipation. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS reflected no physical behavior. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 10/14/25 reflected moderately impaired decision-making…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident /Resident Representative had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's family when he had a fall on 01/17/2026 during the night shift. This failure could place the residents at risk of not being informed of their health status, in order to make informed decisions regarding their care. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed 01/27/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with the following dx. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with other diabetic kidney complications (a chronic autoimmune condition where the pancreas produces little to no insulin, causing high blood glucose (sugar) levels.), Sepsis, unspecified organism,( a life-threatening, emergency response to infection where the immune system damages the body's own tissues and organs) nontraumatic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet the preferences and goals of each resident and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to include in Resident #1's care plan that he had Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and needed insulin for blood glucose management. The facility failed to update Resident #1's care plan after a fall on 01/10/2026 and was sent to the ER for further evaluation and diagnosed with Right sided zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture (often high-impact facial injury involving the cheekbone (zygoma) and its articulations with surrounding bones, causing significant facial asymmetry, flattening, swelling, and numbness.) These deficient practices placed residents at risk for not receiving care and services. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed 01/27/2026 reflected a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to give each resident a special diet to help when there was a nutritional problem for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diet. The facility failed to administer therapeutic diet for Resident #1 from 12/27/2025 through 12/31/2025 as was recommended by the hospital upon discharge. The failure place residents at risk for aspiration, choking and hospitalization.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed 01/27/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with the following dx. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus with other diabetic kidney complications (a chronic autoimmune condition where the pancreas produces little to no insulin, causing high blood glucose (sugar) levels.), Sepsis, unspecified organism,( a life-threatening, emergency response to infection where the immune system damages the body's own tissues and organs) nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (is a life-threatening, often fatal emergency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX