Avir at Knox City

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 39.4 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to use an appropriate transfer for Resident #2 which resulted in a fall for Resident #2 and caused Resident #2's surgical wound from a below the right knee amputation to bleed. This failure could place residents at risk for harm and further injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male whose current admission date was on 2/4/2021, and a readmission to the facility on 4/7/24. Resident #2 had the following diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), muscle weakness, acquired absence of right leg below knee (partial amputation of the right leg), complete traumatic amputation at knee level, left lower leg, subsequent encounter (partial amputation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy in 1 of 3 common hallways reviewed for privacy in that: A list of residents that received incontinence care services was posted on the wall in a hallway at a nurse charting station which was visible to potential passersby. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information personal, or care instructions exposed to others and misuse of personal information. During an observation on 12/16/25 at 4:05 PM revealed a list of 14 residents names that received incontinence care services was posted on the wall in a hallway on the secured unit at the nurse charting station which was located across from the doorway of a dining room. During an interview on 12/18/25 at 11:30 AM, the ADON stated she posted the incontinence care list on the wall in the hallway at the charting station. She stated she posted it on the wall but did not think about how it affected resident's privacy when she did that. She stated she did not remember when she posted it there. She stated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the facility and failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 1 of 2 common dining rooms and 10 of 33 resident rooms (24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure residents that used common areas and rooms were clean, safe, and did not need repair. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unclean, uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a decline in resident psychosocial well-being. The findings included: During an observation on 12/16/25 at 11:42 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed, the vertical blinds in the bedroom window were missing 1 slat. During an observation on 12/16/25 at 12:14 PM room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed 2 broken and/or cracked planks on the flooring in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide information to residents and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 4 of 4 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 confidential residents were provided, per the facility policy through postings in prominent locations: the grievance procedure, access to grievance forms, information regarding who the facility grievance officer was with their contact information, and accommodations to file an anonymous grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Observation of prominent posting on 12/17/2025 at 9:44 AM revealed the facility did not have instructions regarding the grievance procedure with any of their prominent postings. Grievance forms were not readily available to residents in the facility, and there was no accommodation to submit grievance anonymously. During a confidential interview on 12/17/2025 at 10:00 AM with the resident council, 4 confidential residents stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly for 1 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart A) reviewed for medication storage. LVN B left Medication Cart A unlocked and unattended in the hallway by the nurse's station. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart A's medications were stored separately by route. These failures could place residents at risk for drug diversion and an increased risk for medication errors. The findings included: During an observation on 12/16/25 at 11:31 AM, Medication Cart A was observed unlocked and unattended in the hallway by the nurse's station. No staff members or residents were observed in the area around Medication Cart A.During an interview on 12/16/25 at 11:33 AM, LVN B stated she knew she was supposed to lock the medication cart when she walked away from it. LVN B stated she forgot to lock it when she went to check on a resident. LVN B stated a potential negative outcome to the residents was they could get into it [the medication cart]. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu met the nutritional needs of residents and was followed for the lunch meal on 12/16/25 reviewed for nutritional adequacy. The facility failed to: 1) Ensure lunch item served on 12/16/2025 reflected what was on the DM's menu. 2) Ensure residents on special diet (pureed bread) receive pureed bread for the 12/16/2025 lunch meal. These failures could affect all residents who ate food from the kitchen by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. The findings included: Review of the weekly menu week 3 Tuesday lunch revealed Beef goulash, Squash medley, tossed salad, Cornbread, Margarine, Dressing of choice, Fresh baked cookie and a Beverage. During an observation on 12/16/25 from 12:15 PM to 12:30 PM revealed a message written on a white board hanging on a wall in the secured unit dining room said that reflected, Lunch: goulash, green beans, bread slice, fruit. Three items of pureed food were observed to be included on four pureed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the freezers (4), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to protect foods from potential contamination. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.The findings included: The following observations were made during a kitchen tour on 12/16/25 that began at 11:01 AM and concluded at 11:38 AM: The facility failed to have vent hood located directly above the cooktop on the right side of the kitchen free from dust and cobwebs. Walk-in Freezer #1 revealed the following: What appeared to be chicken breasts, ground beef, and chicken wings in three different clear plastic bags with no label, no date on bag. Walk-in Freezer #2 revealed the following: What appeared to be sausage in a clear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0914 — pattern
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy in 10 of 33 resident rooms (24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35) reviewed for privacy in that: 1. Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], beds B, didn't have privacy curtains that were designed or equipped to allow for full visual privacy. 2. Resident rooms 24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35 had slats missing from the window vertical blinds, which allowed potential passersby to see inside the rooms. These failures could also cause residents to feel uncomfortable, disrespected, and possible exposure to anyone passing by. Findings included: During an observation on 12/16/25 at 11:42 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed, the vertical blinds on the bedroom window were missing 1 slat which left an opening of approximately 3 inches wide of the window from top to bottom to be uncovered when the blinds were closed. During an observation on 12/16/25 at 12:14 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the vertical blinds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #5 and Resident #6) reviewed for infection control.-CNA A did not perform hand hygiene after touching a trash can, before touching wipes, and did not perform hand hygiene between all glove changes when providing incontinence care to Resident #6.-LVN A did not perform hand hygiene between all glove changes when providing wound care to Resident #5. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. The findings include: Resident #6 Record review of the admission record for Resident #6, dated 12/18/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: atherosclerotic heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility was free of pests and rodents for the facility's only kitchen. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of flies in the kitchen. These findings could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life.The findings included: Record review of the facility's pest control binder 2025 pest control visited the facility bi-weekly to treat pests and insects. The kitchen was last treated for rats on 06/11/2025 and there was no mention of flies. Observation of the facility's kitchen on 12/16/2025 at 11:16 AM, revealed approximately four flies flying around DM as he prepared meal before lunch was served. The flies were observed landing on food preparation stations that were not in use, on top of the plate warming station and on cooking utensils. No fly trap tapes observed. In an interview on 12/18/2025 at 9:53 AM with the DM, he stated It is the maintenance personnel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 34 (4/1, 4/3, 4/6, 4/7, 4/8, 4/10, 4/11, 4/12, 4/13, 4/14, 4/20, 4/21, 4/27, 4/28, 5/7, 5/10, 5/11, 5/12, 5/24, 5/25, 5/28, 5/29, 5/30, 5/31, 6/1, 6/2, 6/7, 6/8, 6/14, 6/15, 6/21, 6/22, 6/25, and 6/29/2024) of 91 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours a day for 34 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Record review of the facility's employee survey roster dated 10/2/24 revealed there were no RNs employed at the facility. Record review of Schedule Sheet dated April 2024 revealed there was not an RN scheduled to work on (4/1, 4/3, 4/6, 4/7, 4/8, 4/10, 4/11, 4/12, 4/13, 4/14, 4/20, 4/21, 4/27, and 4/28/2024). Record review of Schedule Sheet dated May 2024 revealed there was not an RN scheduled to work on (5/7, 5/10, 5/11, 5/12, 5/24, 5/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $192K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX