Avir at Luling
501 W Austin St, Luling, TX 78648 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (830) 875-5628 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $35,559 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.08 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 47.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not leave the facility without supervision and/or staff knowledge as Resident #1 was returned to the facility by a community member on 04/03/2025. B) The facility failed to ensure staff were educated that Resident #2 was a high elopement risk and implement interventions. C) The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's bed was in a low position with a fall mat in place when he fell on [DATE] and sustained a left hip fracture. A & B) These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 04/16/2025. The IJ template was provided on 04/16/2025 at 4:43 PM. C) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 05/05/2025. The IJ template was provided on 05/05/2025 at 1:17 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not missing from the facility on 10/07/24 for an unknown amount of time until EMS contacted and notified them that he was approximately .9 miles away and had fallen and found on the railroad tracks. Approximately 500 feet from the facility was a busy highway with through traffic of commercial vehicles to include semi-trucks. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 10/10/24 at 2:47 PM and an IJ template was given. While the IJ was removed on 10/11/24 at 2:38 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for abuse. 1. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/12/2025.2. 2. The facility failed to implement interventions to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of ongoing abuse, injury and psychosocial harmBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for abuse. 1. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/12/2025. 2. 2. The facility failed to implement interventions to ensure Resident #1 was not physically abused by Resident #2 on 07/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of ongoing abuse, injury and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure four packs of sliced bread and one pack of hotdog bread located on the bread rack in the facility kitchen was not past the best by dates. 2. The facility failed to ensure the handwashing sink was clean. 3. The facility failed to ensure there was a clean and functional step-on trash near the handwashing sink. 4. The facility failed to ensure the silver cart to distribute residents' food down the hall was clean. 4. The facility failed to ensure the blue crate to store dishes in the kitchen was clean. 5. The facility failed to ensure the AC in the unit in the kitchen was clean. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination, food borne illnesses and decreased quality of life.Findings include:Observation on 02/04/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and provide maintenances services to maintain sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) reviewed for homelike environment and resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 had functioning toilets and sinks in the bathrooms of their resident rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unclean or unsanitary environment, decreased quality of life, or shame. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression (mood disorder, characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities) generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by chronic excessive and uncontrollable worry), and paraplegia (paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating condition. 1. The facility failed to ensure refrigerator #2 maintained a safe storage temperature and not allow food items to be improperly stored.2. The facility failed to ensure the inside kitchen freezer maintained a safe storage temperature and did not allow food items to thaw. These failures pose a risk to all residents of the facility who eat food from the kitchen as they are at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 9/23/2025 at 7:20 AM, Refrigerator #2 silver in color, temperature revealed to be at 52 degrees. Observation on 9/24/2025 at 12:45 PM, refrigerator #2 silver in color, temperature revealed to be at 58 degrees and second freezer in dry pantry room reflected 30 degrees. Interview conducted with DM at 1:17pm, surveyor advised DM the temperature on the freezer in the dry storage area was out of compliance that food was thawing. DM stated the electric breaker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four (Resident #6, Resident #14, Resident #31, and Resident #42) of eight residents reviewed for safe operating patient care equipment and for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating condition. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #6, Resident #14, Resident #31, and Resident #42 had a functioning toilet in their rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of unsanitary conditions, and these failures pose a risk to all residents of the facility who eat food from the kitchen as they are at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: A) Record review of Resident #6's Face sheet printed on 09/25/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction (temporary lack of blood flow to the brain), Type 2 Diabetes (disorder related to abnormal blood sugar levels), and bipolar disorder (mental illness that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 (Residents #51, Resident #38, and Resident #26 ) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure that Resident #51's central venous catheter (a temporary access placed into a large vein in the neck or chest) for dialysis care was addressed in the comprehensive care plan. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had a care plan that identified possible triggers when Resident #38 had a history of trauma. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #26's parole-issued ankle monitor was addressed in the comprehensive care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 36 of 90 days (third quarter 2025) reviewed in that: The facility failed to ensure they had a RN on duty daily for 36 days of the 90 days in the third quarter from 04/2025 through 06/2025.This deficient practice placed residents at risk of missing nursing assessments, resident supervision and skilled nursing treatment. Findings included:Review of the facility's RN staffing hours for the third quarter of 2025 reflected no RN hours for the following days: 04/06 (SU); 04/12 (SA); 04/13 (SU); 04/19 (SA); 04/20 (SU); 04/24 (TH); 04/25 (FR); 04/26 (SA); 04/27 (SU); 04/28 (MO); 04/29 (TU); 04/30 (WE), 05/03 (SA); 05/04 (SU); 05/07 (WE); 05/09 (FR); 05/10 (SA); 05/11 (SU); 05/13 (TU); 05/14 (WE); 05/17 (SA); 05/18 (SU); 05/21 (WE); 05/24 (SA); 05/25 (SU); 05/26 (MO); 05/27 (TU); 05/31 (SA), 06/01 (SU); 06/07 (SA); 06/08 (SU); 06/14 (SA); 06/15 (SU); 06/21 (SA); 06/22 (SU); 06/28 (SA); 06/29 (SU). In an interview on 09/24/2025 at 11:24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor for 5 pureed diets of 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A and DM refrained from adding an unmeasured amount of liquid to spaghetti and meatballs, and green bean pureed meals during lunch service on 9/23/2025. This failure could place residents who received a pureed diet at risk for diminished or altered nutritional status and potential weight loss Findings included: In an observation and interview conducted with Resident #3 on 9/23/2025, at 8:42 AM revealed Resident #3 was observed in his room drinking his coffee after completing his breakfast. Resident stated the food was pitiful. Observation on 9/23/2025, at 10:35 AM, revealed [NAME] A poured an unmeasured amount of milk into the spaghetti noodles without measuring. After mixing, the spaghetti was noted to be loose; [NAME] A then tore slices of bread and pureed them into the mixture. The DM walked over and subsequently added…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to label and date all food items located in refrigerators, freezers and in the dry food pantry area on 9/23/2025, 9/24/2025, and 9/25/2025. 2. The facility failed to discard expired food items located in the refrigerator and in the dry food pantry area. 3. The facility failed to ensure the trash containers were covered with lids on 9/23/2025, 9/24/2025, and 9/25/2025. 4. The facility failed to clean and sanitize its food storage areas, to include the freezers in the outside storage room on 9/23/2025, 9/24/2025, and 9/25/2025. These failures could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses.The findings included: Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/23/2025 beginning at 7:20 AM, revealed the following was observed: 2 trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's door was closed when provided personal care to provide respect and dignity. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable, embarrassed and decreased privacy.Findings included:Review of Resident 25's Face sheet dated 09/24/2025 reflected an admission date of 05/12/2025 with diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease with early onset (brain disease that affects memory, thinking), and unspecified dementia (cognitive decline).Review of Resident 25's MDS assessment, dated 08/18/2025, reflected Resident #25 had a BIMS score of 2 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment.Review of Resident 25's comprehensive care plan on 09/24/2025, reflected resident's ADL care will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility did not refer Resident #38 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when he received a new diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback and avoidance of similar situations) or during readmission to the facility on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated and receive needed PASRR services.Findings included:Record review of Resident #38's Face sheet printed on 09/24/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted on [DATE]. Initial admission date is listed as 04/10/2025. The most recent admission date is listed as 09/17/2025. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered, comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #43) of 6 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions. The facility failed to update Resident #43's care plan to reflect his current need for assistance with his indwelling catheter bag placement after self-transfers. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care, services, or treatments they need. Findings included: Review of Resident #43's Face Sheet reflected he was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses cerebral infarction (the pathological process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain) encephalopathy (A medical term used to describe a disease that affects brain structure or function. It causes altered mental state and confusion.) and retention of urine (inability to urinate). Review of Resident #43's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #43 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of two residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #43). The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's received care to prevent Urinary Tract Infections when they stored his catheter bag on the floor. These failures could place residents with foley catheters at risk for urinary tract infections and change of condition. Findings Included: Review of Resident #43's Face Sheet reflected he was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses cerebral infarction (the pathological process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain.) encephalopathy (A medical term used to describe a disease that affects brain structure or function. It causes altered mental state and confusion.) and retention of urine (inability to urinate). Review of Resident #43's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #38 had a history of trauma. This failure could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of Resident #38's Face sheet printed on 09/24/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted on [DATE]. Initial admission date is listed as 04/10/2025. The most recent admission date is listed as 09/17/2025. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #13 and Resident #25) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure:1. TN used clean, sanitized scissors during wound care for Resident #25 on 09/24/2025.2. LVN D performed hand hygiene prior to preparing an injection for Resident #13 on 09/24/2025. 3. LVN D wore proper gloves (PPE) while administering an injection for Resident #13 on 09/24/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure and/or possible transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's Face sheet printed on 09/24/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes (disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified for two (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's elopement risk and interventions were included on his care plan. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's fall interventions were included on his care plan. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their needs. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (type a stroke where brain tissue dies due to lack of blood and oxygen), muscle weakness, other lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet (difficulty with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 8 of (03/15/2025, 03/16/2025, 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, 03/30/2025, 04/11/2025, and 04/12/2025 ) 33 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure they had an RN charge nurse on 03/15/2025, 03/16/2025, 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, 03/30/2025, 04/11/2025, and 04/12/2025. This failure could place residents a risk of missed nursing assessments, interventions, care and treatment. Findings included: Review of daily sign-in schedule for March 15, 2025 through April 17, 2025, reflected zero hours work by an RN charge nurse on the following days: 03/15/2025, 03/16/2025, 03/22/2025, 03/23/2025, 03/29/2025, 03/30/2025, 04/11/2025, and 04/12/2025. During an interview on 04/17/2025 at 3:20 PM, the ADON reflected that between 03/15/2025 and 04/17/2025 there was not an RN that worked at the facility on the weekends. The ADON stated between that time, an agency RN worked on 04/05/2025 and the DON was at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for baseline care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's elopement risk and interventions were included on his baseline care plan. This failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their needs. Findings include: Review of Resident #1 face sheet reflected at [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 04/08/2025 with diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size and mass of skeletal muscle tissue leading to a loss of strength and function), difficulty in walking, unsteadiness on feet (difficulty with balance and coordination), other lack of coordination, and unspecified dementia (cognitive decline, impacting memory, thinking and problem-solving skills that are severe enough to impact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey Agency in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to report to the state agency when the facility was notified that CNA A requested and accepted money from Resident #1 on the weekend of 11/09/24 and 11/10/24. This failure could place residents at risk for further misappropriation. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], went out to another facility on 11/01/24, and was readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were reported immediately or no later than 24 hours for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Agency an incident where Resident #1 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge and was found approximately an hour later after he had fallen on railroad tracks approximately one mile from the facility on 10/07/24. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse or and neglect. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, history of falling, Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder that affects the nervous system and worsens over time, cerebral infarction (stroke), unsteadiness on feet, and muscle wasting and atrophy (wasting away). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: 1. The facility failed to store clean plastic cups in a manner that allowed for air circulation. 2. The facility failed to ensure the tabletop can opener blade and base were free of buildup of grime and debris. 3. The facility failed to ensure an opened 5-lb. bag of pancake mix was stored in a sealed bag or container in the dry storage room. 4. The facility failed to ensure the interior racks, walls and floor of the reach-in refrigerator were free of dirt and debris. 5. The facility failed to ensure the low-temperature dishwasher reached 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash cycle. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 09/03/2024 at 11:35 AM revealed two plastic trays of clear plastic drinking cups on the clean side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day , 7 days a week and employ a full time DON for 74 of 184 days reviewed in that: The facility failed to have an RN scheduled on 74 dates that were reviewed and has not had a fulltime DON since 7/31/24. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not the nursing services received by the residents properly supervised. Record review of the facility's RN staffing hours from the time period of 3/1/24 through 8/31/24 revealed that an RN was not working in the building for an 8 hour shift on the following dates: 3/2/24, 3/3/24, 3/10/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/21/24, 3/22/24, 3/24/24, 4/14/24, 4/21/24, 4/28/24, 4/29/24,4/30/24, 5/1/24, 5/4/24, 5/6/24, 5/7/24, 5/8/24, 5/13/24, 5/14/24, 5/15/24, 5/18/24, 5/19/24, 5/20/24, 5/21/24, 5/22/24, 5/26/24, 5/27/24, 5/28/24, 5/29/24, 6/1/24, 6/2/24, 6/3/24, 6/4/24, 6/5/24, 6/9/24, 6/14/24, 6/15/24, 6/16/24, 6/18/24, 6/19/24, 6/22/24, 6/23/24, 6/29/24, 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/13/24, 7/14/24, 7/19/24, 7/20/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental care for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #33) reviewed for dental services in that: The facility failed to assist Resident #33 in obtaining needed dental services following referral to an oral surgeon for tooth extraction after being diagnosed with abscessed tooth. These failures could lead to pain and infection of teeth and gums. The findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated, 09/06/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain); Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic kidney complication; and periapical abscess without sinus (a pocket of pus at the root of a tooth caused by an infection that doesn't involve the sinuses). Record review of Resident #33's annual MDS Assessment, dated 08/14/2024, reflected Resident #33 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for four of four residents (Residents #17, #20, #32 and #37) reviewed for food meeting residents' needs, in that: The DM did not puree the peach cobbler to a pudding or mashed potato consistency as required for Residents #17, #20, #32 and #37 who were ordered a pureed diet. This deficient practice could affect residents who received pureed meals from the kitchen by contributing to choking, poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings included: Record review on 09/05/2024 of the resident menu for 09/05/2024 for residents whose diet order was a pureed diet was: Pureed spaghetti with meat sauce, pureed sauteed peas with onions, pureed dinner roll, pureed peach cobbler, and a beverage. Record review on 09/05/2024 of the electronic health records of Residents #17, #20, #32 and #37 revealed four residents had the diet order: Regular diet, Pureed texture, and Thin liquids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #39 and #47) and 1 of 2 halls (South Hall) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. During a wound dressing change for Resident #39, LVN-F did not sanitize hands or change gloves in between removal of old dressing and cleansing and application of new dressing. 2. While providing incontinent care for Resident #47, CNA-E did not sanitize her hands in between glove changes when moving between soiled and clean incontinent pads, touched wipes dispenser with dirty gloves, and stored clean gloves in the front pocket of her scrubs where her cell phone was also stored. 3. The facility failed to ensure a shared shower and toilet area was clean and free from sources of infection. These deficient practices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to repair the overhead light in room#4 that had mold inside the cover, remove rust from an overhead pipe above a bed in room [ROOM NUMBER], clean a dirty chair cushion in room [ROOM NUMBER], repair a window sill in room [ROOM NUMBER] that was stripped of paint, remove the mold on the hallway ceiling outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], remove the dust/dirt from two hallway air conditioning vent, across from room [ROOM NUMBER], re-attach the covers for the 2 overhead lights in room [ROOM NUMBER], secure the overhead light to the ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER], replace the 3 ceiling panels in room [ROOM NUMBER], remove the mold from a side wall vent in room [ROOM NUMBER], remove the mold from a wall area above the door entrance in room [ROOM NUMBER], replace a broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident environment that was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for effective pest control in that: The facility failed to provide a resident environment that was free of pests and rodents as live roaches were observed in resident rooms and in the kitchen. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of remaining in an environment that was not free of pests and rodents. The findings included: 1. During an observation on 9/3/24 at 10:45 AM in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] a live roach was observed on the right wall after entrance to the room. During an interview with CNA A on 9/3/24 at 10:46 AM she revealed that she had also observed the live roach in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview with Resident #22 and Resident # 29 on 9/3/24 at 11:20 AM the residents stated that they had observed live roaches on their bedroom floor approximately 2 weeks ago. 2. During an observation on 09/05/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives, or treatment options and to choose the alternative or options he or she preferred, for 1 (Resident #6) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for antipsychotic medication Ziprasidone and antidepressant medications Zoloft and Trazodone prior to their administration to Resident #6. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their, or that of their responsible party's prior knowledge or consent, placing residents at risk of inability to make decisions regarding their plan of care and an increased risk for adverse reactions to the medications. Findings included: Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #3 and #33) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure that: 1. Resident #3's order for Xarelto (a medication used to treat/prevent blood clots) was reflected in the resident's current comprehensive care plan. 2. Resident #33's use of Sertraline (a medication used to treat depression, also known as Zoloft) was reflected in the resident's current comprehensive care plan. This deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to missed or inaccurate care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/06/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Epilepsy (a disorder that causes seizures), Hemiplegia (…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for hygiene, in that. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #34 received a shower and changed his stained shirt when his shower was scheduled on 09/04/2024. This deficient practice could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, and/or a diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 09/06/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 03/16/2023, and diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (serious condition that occurs when b rain tissue dies due to a lack of blood flow); Hemiplegia and hemiparesis (a condition that causes partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body)affecting left dominant side; Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 23 Residents (Resident #22) reviewed for accident hazards in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 was safe from hazards when there a small refrigerator (19x32 inches) placed on top of clothes drawer that was positioned near the head of the resident's bed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of remaining in an environment that was not free of accident hazards and being injured as a result of the hazard. The finding included: During an observation on 9/3/24 at 11:20am in Resident # 22's room revealed a personal resident refrigerator which measured approximately 19x32 inches which was placed on top of a 4 drawer clothes dresser which measured approximately 30x30 inches. The refrigerator was noted to be directly beside the head of the Resident # 22's bed. Record review of the face sheet dated 9/4/24 for Resident #22 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' pharmacist medication regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the resident's attending physician and documentation of what, if any, action has been taken to address them, for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #3 and #33) whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the Physician provided a clinical response to the consulting pharmacist's recommended changes which consisted of: 1. To ensure monitoring for side effects for Resident #3's Xarelto (a medication used to treat and prevent blood clots, commonly referred to as an anti-coagulant.); and 2. To clarify diagnosis for use of an anti-depressant, and for dose reduction consideration for that anti-depressant for Resident #33. This failure could place residents at risk for significant health status declines. The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 09/06/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not given a psychotropic drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 (Resident #33) of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, in that: Resident #33 was prescribed a psychotropic drug for depression without a documented diagnosis of depression in the clinical record. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated, 09/06/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain); Type 2 diabetes mellitus (long-term condition in which body has trouble controlling blood sugar) with other diabetic kidney complication; and Irritability and Anger. Record review of Resident #33's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week, for 22 of 93 day reviewed for registered nursing coverage, in that: The facility failed to ensure a registered nurse [RN] was present in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours per day and seven days per week on 22 separate occasions in the months of May 2023 - July 2023. This failure could place residents at risk of assessments, interventions, care and treatment requiring the advanced education, skills and judgement of an RN and leaving staff without supervisory coverage for coordination of events. The findings were: Review of PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, with a run date of 08/04/2023 revealed No RN Hours and Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day were triggered for the fiscal year Quarter 2 2023 (January 1 - March 31). Record review of RN time sheets, for the 3 months prior to survey (May to July 2023) revealed 22 days without a total of 8 hours RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property, in that: The facility failed to report on 3 separate occasions Resident #2 smoking or bringing marijuana into the facility. This failure could affect residents residing in the facility by placing them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure there was a foot operated, covered trash receptacle at the hand washing sink. 2. The facility failed to prevent an opened box of bacon in the main refrigerator past the use by date. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: Observation on 08/08/2023 at 11:15 a.m., revealed there was not a foot operated, covered trash receptacle at the hand washing sink. A small, uncovered trash can was beside the sink and was full of paper towels. An observation and interview with the DS on 08/10/2023 at 10:45 a.m. revealed a trash receptacle at the hand washing sink with a swing-top lid. When asked about a foot-operated, covered trash receptacle for the hand washing sink, the DS stated there should be one at that sink so clean hands didn't touch the swing top and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #6 and #9) reviewed for preferences, in that: 1. Resident #9's call light was unplugged. 2. Resident #6's call light was not within reach This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance at risk in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 8/10/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis that included: [Type 2 diabetes] is a long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly. [Morbid Obesity] A serious health condition resulting from an abnormally high body mass diagnosed with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m². [Schizophrenia] is a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally. Review of Resident #9's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menus were followed for 2 of 2 meals observed in that: 1. mashed potatoes were served instead of scalloped potatoes for the lunch meal on 08/09/2023 2. green beans were served instead of breaded okra for the dinner meal on 08/10/2023 This failure could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life. The findings were: 1. Record review of the facility's, Summer 2023 menu, Day 10, revealed meatloaf with tomato sauce, scalloped potatoes, green peas with sauteed onions and chocolate pudding were to be served with the lunch meal on 08/08/2023. The daily menu posted in the dining room revealed no indication for a substitute. An observation on 08/08/2023 at 12:03 p.m. revealed meatloaf with tomato sauce, mashed potatoes, green peas with sauteed onions and chocolate pudding had been served to the residents for the lunch meal. 2. Record review of the facility's, Summer 2023 menu, Day 12, revealed hamburger stew, breaded okra, cornbread and ice cream were to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account nonsmoking residents for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #16 and #27) reviewed for smoking, in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #16 and #27 did not have lighters in their possession. This failure could place residents at risk for smoking-related injuries and fires in the facility. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 08/11/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood), transient cerebral ischemic attack (mini-stroke, symptoms usually end in less than an hour), difficulty walking and other lack of coordination, dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$35,559 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $4,648 — penalty dated 2025-07-22
- $24,752 — penalty dated 2025-05-06
- $6,159 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUADALUPE COUNTY HOSPITAL BOARD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/03/2017 |
| 501 W AUSTIN STREET PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GANN, KODY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| 501 W AUSTIN STREET OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| BEARD, DONALD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676292. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.