Avir at Mansfield
1402 E. Broad St., Mansfield, TX 76063 · For profit - Corporation · 127 certified beds · (979) 639-1515 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.4% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 8.5–19.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 69.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.81 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident # 67) of 18 residents reviewed for smoking. CNA D failed to comply with the facility's smoking policy, when she failed to provide continuous direct supervision to residents during their smoke break, which resulted in Resident #67's hair and scalp being burned. Another resident had to pat out the burning hair, and Resident #67 sustained a superficial burn (affecting the top layer of skin) to her scalp. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified to have existed from 01/18/23 through 01/25/23. The IJ was determined to be at past noncompliance as the facility had implemented actions that corrected the noncompliance prior to the beginning of the survey. This failure placed residents at risk of harm and/or serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident or family group, if one exists, with private space; and take reasonable steps, with the approval of the group, to make residents and family members aware of upcoming meetings in a timely manner for 1 of 1 reviewed for resident council meeting. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns [NAME] to lack of privacy. Findings included: Interview on 06/03/2025 at 1:00 PM with Activity Director revealed monthly resident council meetings were held in the facility's dining room because of space needed to accommodate the residents. She stated meetings should be conducted in a private area to allow the residents to express their concerns freely and openly. Observation and interview on 06/04/2025 at 10:00 AM during a confidential resident group meeting with 13 residents revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and functional environment for 3 of 14 rooms (Residents #5, Resident #36, Resident #1, and Resident #14) reviewed for a sanitary, functional, and homelike environment, as evidenced by: 1. Resident #5's room had an unrepaired wall and noticeably hanging loose paint particles by the head of his bed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36, Resident #1 and Resident #14's restroom flooring and tiles were repaired, and faucets had both hot and cold running water in the sink. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #14's room did not have a strong urine odor. These failures could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life. 1. Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5 face sheet dated 06/05/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting the left side (Partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident (#31) removed oxygen tubing and tank before entering smoking area and smokers extinguish cigarette in designated areas. Staff failed to ensure smoking residents extinguished cigarettes in a safe manner. Staff failed to remove Resident #31's oxygen tubing and tank before entering smoking area. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for burns and injuries. Findings included: 1.Review of current, undated admission Record for Resident #31 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female, re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, encounter for adjustment and management of vascular access device, acute bronchitis and nicotine dependence, cigarettes. Review of Resident #31's Care Plan dated 04/15/2025 revealed the following focus areas: *Problem; Non-compliant with smoking policy r/t hiding leftover…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 resident (Resident #23) of 24 residents reviewed for resident rights, as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's right to participate in walking activities were consistent with his interest and choices about aspects of his life in the facility that are significant to the resident. This failure could place residents at risk of limiting the resident's opportunity to exercise their autonomy regarding those things that are important, including interests and preferences. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 06/04/2025, reflected that the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with primary diagnosis of other epilepsy, not intractable, with status epilepticus, and other diagnoses of hemiplegia (affecting right dominant side), generalized anxiety disorder, cognitive communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who is responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident The designated interdisciplinary team member is responsible for the following: ii) Communicating with hospice representatives and other healthcare providers participating in the provision of care for the terminal illness, related conditions, and other conditions, to ensure quality of care for the patient and family. (iii) Ensuring that the LTC facility communicates with the hospice medical director, the patient's attending physician, and other practitioners participating in the provision of care to the patient as needed to coordinate the hospice care with the medical care provided by other physicians for two (resident #22 and Resident #44) of four residents reviewed for hospice services. 1.The facility did not designate a member of the facility to obtain Resident #22's current hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received their prescribed diet special instructions finger foods for the lunch meal on 04/09/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of independence and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to the brain) affecting left dominant side. Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to ensure there were PRN wound care orders for Resident #1's Stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer per professional standards of care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's dressing was replaced when it became dislodged, allowing the wound to become contaminated with feces. This failure could place residents at risk of developing infections to wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacrum. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected his BIMS score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 6 (Resident's #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, and #12) of 8 residents reviewed for environment sanitation and safety. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's portable toilet was emptied after use and soiled briefs and wipes were discarded after completing incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure trash was discarded from the adjoined restroom for Resident's #8, #9, #10, and #11 to a biohazard waste location upon incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure hardware from a dis-assembled nightstand draw (exposing loose boards, screws, and metal frame) was removed from Resident's #12's environment. This deficient practice could result infections due to unsanitary environment, injuries, and/or accidents while propelling and ambulating independently in the facility. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 08/16/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the food preparation tables were clean, food was covered and all utensils were removed during meal prep, the lid was on the kitchen trashcan near food prep table and fish, fish was properly thawed, and dry storage containers were cleaned and free of dried food particles. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings Included: In an observation of the facility's only kitchen on 08/16/24 beginning at 11:30 AM revealed: 1) 1- Large stainless-steel pan of apple cobbler on the prep table uncovered. 2) 1-Large stainless-steel pan of apple cobbler on the prep table uncovered and serving spoon inside the container. 3) 1-8 oz. carton of thickener under the prep table with the cap removed and lying on the bottom shelf. 4) 3-5-gallon clear dry unclean containers under a prep table (dried red, white,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1 and #7) of 3 resident reviewed for respiratory therapy. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's NC was stored in a clean bag and dated (bag was spotted with liquid white and brown substance). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen concentrator filter was clean and free of dust, crumbs, and white particles, and the humidifier water bottle was not dated. These failures could lead to respiratory infections, poor air quality, and not having their respiratory requirements met. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/16/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 09/28/22 and a re-admission date of 08/15/24. The resident's diagnoses included metabolic Encephalopathy (disease of the brain) COPD, emphysema (chronic lung disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for1 of 1 laundry room and 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 13) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to handle, store, and process linens and residents clothing to prevent the spread of infection by not preventing cross contamination of staff belongings and resident personal clothing when staff placed their purses, in the same laundry cart with residents personal clothing. The facility failed to have in place a barrier between the clean and dirty areas of the laundry room to prevent the spread of infection. The facility failed to implement appropriate measures for sorting and folding resident laundry on a table that was free of staff personal keys and water cups to prevent cross contamination. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed in consultation with the resident and the resident's representative for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #20, Resident #24, Resident #42, Resident #167) reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20, Resident#24, Resident #42, and Resident 167, and/or the resident's representative were invited to participate in the comprehensive care plan meeting per resident rights guidelines that residents have the right to participate in their planning of care. This failure affected 4 residents and placed 62 residents at risk for a loss of independence, psychosocial well-being, and the opportunity for them to participate in their planning of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet dated 04/25/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with an initial admission to facility on 02/01/2013. Her diagnoses included Aphasia following unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a clean and functional environment for six (Residents #34, #54, #16, #59, #36, and #7) out of 24 residents reviewed for a sanitary, functional, and homelike environment, as evidenced by: 1. Resident #34's room had grimy, stained, dusty floors, a badly scraped chest with missing wood veneer and handle, and grimy, stained floor, and a bent privacy curtain runner. The bathroom, which was shared with Resident #54 in the room next-door had a non-working sink and toilet, and a damaged and badly repaired wall in the bathroom. The bathroom floor was also grimy, stained, and was repaired with noticeably mismatched tiles. Resident #34's door would not close completely, due to the placement of a bed next to the door. 2. Resident #16''s room had gnats, and the unmade bed was saturated with urine. 3. Resident #59's room had a cracked, flaking, translucent film over part of the window, and damaged windowsill and wall below the window. 4. Resident #36's room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food that was palatable and attractive for two of two meals (lunch meals on 04/23/24 and 04/25/24) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to deliver food with an appetizing taste for the lunch meals on 04/23/24 and 04/25/24. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of poor intake of nutrition, weight loss, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An interview on 04/23/24 at 10:53 AM with Resident #34 revealed she thought the food had gone downhill in quality since the new DM started, about a month and a half ago, and it was terrible. She also felt the current dietary manager was not very nice and was not accommodating. She told the state surveyor if there was any doubt about the food, to ask the other residents, because everyone hates it. She said they talked about food at every resident council meeting, and everyone she knew was unhappy with it. In an anonymous group interview on 04/24/24 at 1:00 PM six of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in their only 1 of 1 kitchen. The grease in the deep fryer was dirty with blackened grease and food particles around edges. The stove surface under the metal grates had a build-up of blackened food debris. This failure could place 62 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 04/24/2024 at 9:10 am, the edge of the deep fryer had a thick build-up of brown and black grease with food particles around the inside edges. There was grease that had run off the edges and down the sides of the deep fryer. Deep fryer was stationed beside the stove in the kitchen. Stove had been used to cook breakfast and the staff were in the process of cleaning the stove. During an interview on 04/24/2024 at 9:10 am, the dietary manager acknowledged the deep fryer had old grease in it. The DM revealed the deep fryer was cleaned one time a month. The used grease was used to fry foods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for three hallways (front hall (Administrative offices and kitchen hallway), hall 16-39, and hall 40-54) of four halls reviewed for physical environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free from pervasive urine odors and dirt and grime (most notably around doorways) on hallway floors. These failures could affect all residents, resulting infections, and low feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Observation on 04/23/24 at 8:35 AM revealed when the state surveyors initially entered the building, the smell of urine was very strong upon entering the facility through the front door. Observation beginning on 04/23/24 at 9:20 AM, at the start of the initial tour of the facility, and throughout the survey period (through 04/25/24 at approximately 4:30 PM), observations were made by all state surveyors noting urine odors in the halls, with the odor being strongest in the halls near rooms 40-58 and 12-24 but could be smelled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for one (Resident #44) of 24 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's call light was within reach of the resident. This failure could place the residents at risk of falling, injury, and feelings of low self-worth due to not being able to call for help. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 04/25/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included cerebral palsy (a condition affecting motor control), other lack of coordination, and severe intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/27/24, revealed he had unclear speech, was sometimes understood by others, and sometimes understood others. He had a BIMS score of seven,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #34) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to create a care plan addressing Resident #34's PTSD and colostomy. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 04/25/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of paraplegia (lower body paralysis), colostomy, pressure ulcers, mood disorder, bi-polar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, anti-social personality disorder, and seizures. Review of Resident #34's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed she could understand others, and be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a centralized staff work area, for two of two nursing stations reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure the call system was working properly for the nursing stations in zone 1 and zone 2. On two hallways, causing the call system to sound when no call light was on, and no light for call buttons appearing on the panel. In addition, the call light of one resident (Resident #34, near station #2) would not turn off properly when used. This failure could cause residents who relied on the call light system to have a delayed response or no way to contact staff to meet their needs. Findings included: An observation on 04/23/24 at 11:08 AM revealed Resident #34's call light would shut off. Multiple staff were observed to go in and out of the room, heard to be trying to figure out how to turn off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, staff, and the public on 2 of 4 halls (Zones 4 and 6), Four bedrooms (Rooms#11, #13, #18, and #35) and the 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for environmental conditions. 1. The facility failed to ensure ceiling tiles in its Zone 4, 6, and dining room were free of brown dried substances. 2. The facility failed to ensure the air condition vent covers in Rooms #11, #13, #18, and #35 were free of damage and debris. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. The findings included: Observation on 03/05/24 from 2:05 p.m. to 2:20 p.m., revealed the following: - Occupied Rooms #11, #13, #18, and #35's air conditioner vent covers were observed to be damaged and covered in black, green and white substances. - three ceiling tiles in the facility's Zone 6 had dried brown rings on them - two ceiling tiles near the station 2 nurses' station had dried brown rings on them - three ceiling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the walk-in cooler were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure leftover food was discarded prior to the use by date. 3. The facility failed to ensure cooler temperatures were monitored and recorded since 02/12/24. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observations on 03/05/24 at 11:05 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager, of the facility's walk in cooler revealed the following: - The temperature log near the door of the facility's cooler had the last recorded temperature dated 02/12/24. - a Ziploc bag of prepared meat, labeled taco meat and dated 02/24/24. - a covered bowl of fruit that was not labeled or dated In an interview on 03/05/24 at 11:11 a.m., [NAME] A stated he did not realize the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails and enabler bars with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for three (Residents #1, #3, #4) of 3 resident rooms observed and reviewed for bed rails/enabler bars. The facility failed to have consents signed for the quarter bed rails/enabler bars for Residents #1, #3, and #4. This failure could affect residents who used bed rails/enabler bars at risk of the resident/responsible party not being aware of the risk. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/11/2024 revealed resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and current admit on 01/09/2024 with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (high levels of carbon dioxide in the blood), Unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (unknown complication or condition that results from a pre-existing ischemic stroke; a result of disrupted blood flow to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident resided and received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for call lights. Staff failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's, call buttons were within reach. This failure could affect 2 residents who resided on Station 1 at risk for decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/11/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on 01/09/2024 with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (May occur either acutely, insidiously, or acutely upon chronic carbon dioxide retention); Unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (Residual effects or conditions produced after the acute phase of an illness or injury has ended); Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of four residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care to Resident #1 who was observed on 08/31/23 wearing a saturated incontinent brief and laying on a bedsheet stained with a large dried brown ring. 2. The facility failed to provide timely incontinent care to Resident #2 who was observed on 08/31/23 wearing a saturated incontinent brief and laying on a draw sheet that covered a bedsheet stained with a large dried brown ring. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, decreased self-esteem, lack of dignity and risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders, dated 08/2023, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior and failed to provide clean bed linens that were in good conditions for 7 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7) of 7 residents reviewed for safe environment. The facility failed to maintain a clean environment for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth, and possible infections. Findings included: Observation on 08/16/23 at 9:40 AM of Resident #2's room revealed her floor had the paper wrapped for silverware lying in the middle of the room, her bathroom had a dead cricket on the floor and the toilet contained urine that had not been flushed. Interview on 08/16/23 at 9:40 AM with Resident #2 revealed the wrapper had been on the floor since the previous afternoon. She stated she had her urinary catheter removed this morning; she can now use a bedside commode. Resident stated she never used her bathroom because it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for hygiene. The facility failed to maintain Resident #1's fingernails and prevent them from digging into the palm of her hand. This failure placed the resident at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, emphysema (lung disease), high blood pressure, stroke, and heart failure. Review of Resident #1's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed her BIMS score was calculated at 15, indicating intact cognition. Her Functional Status revealed she required extensive assistance with all of her ADLs. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 07/14/23, revealed she was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 6 sharps boxes reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to maintain a sharps container in the shower room of 2nd Hall and prevent it from being over filled. This failure placed residents at risk of being exposed to used sharps and potential bloodborne pathogens. Findings included: Observation on 08/16/23 at 9:15 AM of the shower room for 2nd Hall revealed the sharps container, used to dispose of sharp medical instruments, was past the fill line and had one razor protruding out of the opening. Interview on 08/16/23 at 11:47 AM with LVN B revealed the nurses were responsible for monitoring the sharps boxes and changing them out when needed. He stated the nurses rarely went into the shower rooms so they relied on the CNAs to tell them when a sharps box in the shower rooms needed to be changed. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Committee policy revealed it did not address sharps boxes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three shared restrooms and 1 of 3 shower rooms checked for hot water temperature in the [NAME] side of the facility. The facility failed to provide hot water for the [NAME] side of the facility restrooms and shower room. This failure could affect residents who take showers on the [NAME] side of the facility by placing them at risk for uncomfortable environment, low self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation during facility initial tour on 02/21/23 between the times of 10:45 AM - 11:50 AM of shared restrooms for room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and #11, Rooms #13 and #15 revealed the restroom sink water upon touch did not get warm or hot. Interview during a confidential group meeting on 02/22/23 at 2:30 PM, five out of ten residents revealed the facility had been without hot water in Station 2 (West side) shower room. Residents stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food prepared by methods, which conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for one (lunch meal) of one meal services reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager prepared the pureed lunch meal in a manner to conserve nutrition, flavor, and palatability on 02/22/23. Tap water was used to obtain an appropriate consistency. The failure could place residents, who were on a pureed diet, at risk for a decrease in nutritive status, loss of appetite, decreased intake and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: Observation of the Dietary Manager preparing pureed lunches on 02/22/23 at 11:16 AM revealed he used tap water to thin and smooth out green vegetables, pork tips, and white rice. All food items appeared to be slightly too thin and did not have a pudding-like consistency. Interview on 02/22/23 at 11:25 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed that all kitchen staff, including himself, knew to follow a recipe when preparing pureed foods; however, he had not gotten a chance to update the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. -The Facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and thawed in accordance with professional standards. These failures could place all residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: An observation on 02/21/23 at 9:45 AM revealed the following: In refrigerator: -Raw ground beef thawing on a top shelf, above cooked/prepared foods. -Large metal pan of Jell-O uncovered. -Uncooked French fries, outside of original package, in plastic bag, unlabeled and undated. -Gravy in a metal pan, undated and unlabeled. -Meat patties in a metal pan, undated and unlabeled. -Cooked rice in a metal pan, undated and unlabeled. -Cooked beans in a metal pan, undated and unlabeled. Interview on 02/21/23 at 9:58 AM with [NAME] I revealed he had worked at the facility since July 2022. He stated he had been trained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for tube feeding. LVN A failed to flush Resident #24's g-tube prior to initiating a bolus feeding (feeding method using a syringe to deliver formula through feeding tube). LVN A failed to follow physician orders regarding Resident #24's bolus feeding by adding water to the formula. This deficient practice could place residents who require enteral feedings at risk for weight loss, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and hospitalizations. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's Face Sheet, dated 02/23/23, revealed Resident #24 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of gastrostomy status (surgical opening into the stomach), gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #44) of two residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 had an order prescribed by a physician to receive oxygen. Resident #44 was receiving oxygen without any physician orders from 02/02/23 - 02/23/23. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and ineffective treatment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 02/23/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 08/04/22 and re-admission date of 12/26/22. The resident's diagnoses included: acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (build-up of carbon dioxide in bloodstream), obesity, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Record review of Resident #44's MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #41) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. LVN C failed to follow the facility policy for flushing Resident #41's gastrostomy tube with 15 mL (or prescribed amount) of water before, between, and after medications, when she administered Aspirin 81 mg, Vitamin D 25 mg, Omega 3 capsule, Thiamin Vitamin B-1, FeSo4 (ferrous sulphate) 10 ml, and Keppra 2.5 ml to the resident. These failures could put residents who received medications via gastrostomy tube at risk for overload and aspiration. Findings included: Review of Resident #41's MDS (a standardized tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated 01/17/23, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for two (Station 1 front medication cart and Station 1 back medication cart) of four medication carts reviewed for labeling and storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure insulin vials were dated after they were opened. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired insulins were removed from the cart. The failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were ineffective due to not labeling with opening dates and removing the expired medications. Findings included: Observation on 02/22/23 at 12:15 PM of the Station 1 front Medication Cart with LVN B revealed two insulin pens, Insulin Aspart and 1 lispro were opened, partially used, with the open date of 01/13/23 and 01/20/23. Interview on 02/22/23 at 12:25 PM with LVN B, who was the Station 1 front Charge Nurse, revealed she knew insulin pens and vials for short acting were good for only 28 days. She stated she knew it was her and all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/10/2021 |
| HOOPER, GRADY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| 1402 E. BROAD ST OPCO,LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2026 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2026 |
| 1402 E BROAD STREET PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2025 |
| ACOSTA, MELCHOR | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2021 |
| MILLER, KISSY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/08/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675792. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.