Avir At Monahans
1200 W 15th St, Monahans, TX 79756 · Government - Hospital district · 92 certified beds · (432) 943-2741 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.10 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.4–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.47 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 53.4 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.74 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.60 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #10) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure the hypertensive medication orders included adequate indications for its use to include parameters to administer or hold medications for Resident #2, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #10. This failure could place the residents at risk of inadequate care and services. Findings included :Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet reviewed on 5/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date of 01/21/2026. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: acute respiratory failure (not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), major depressive disorder (consistent sadness), history of leukemia (cancer of the body's blood forming tissues), lack of coordination, and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure the staff developed the comprehensive care plan goals and interventions from the comprehensive assessment for Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #1 and Resident #2 described the resident's goals for admission and desired outcomes.The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 described the resident's preference and potential for future discharge. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for Resident #2 documented a desire to return to the community was assessed. This failure could place the residents at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all services, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, being provided meet professional standards for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was diagnosed by a practitioner using evidence-based criteria that meet professional standards of quality and lacked supporting documentation (comprehensive assessment) in the resident's medical record for a schizoaffective disorder diagnosis. This failure could place the residents at risk of not meeting their mental health needs. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reviewed on 5/10/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date of 5/8/2025. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder (both schizophrenia and mood disorders that affect the perception of reality with hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thoughts or speech), Osteoporosis (loss of bone),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that all services, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, being provided or arranged by the facility met professional standards for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was diagnosed by a practitioner using evidence-based criteria that met professional standards of quality and lacked supporting documentation in the resident's medical record for schizoaffective disorder diagnosis. This failure could place residents at risk of physical and psychosocial harm by not following the clinical standards of practice.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet undated, accessed on 02/8/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis on right side after a stroke), Schizoaffective Disorder (condition combining schizophrenia such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored, labeled and dated.The facility failed to dispose of spoiled food items properly.The facility failed to prevent possible cross contamination.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used hair restraints properly. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings included:Observation on 7/27/2025 at approximately 9:42 AM revealed [NAME] E touching the lid of a trash can to place paper towels in it after washing hands.Observation on 7/27/2025 at approximately 9:45 AM revealed a box with 5 bags of corn tortillas received 8/13/2024 did not have a use by date (UBD). The tortillas at the bottom of each bag were hard. Observation on 7/27/2025 at approximately 9:45 AM revealed 2 bags of crispy rice cereal removed from the original packaging, without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #5, #6, and #33) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had a care plan for Activities of Daily Living, Incontinence, Insulin, Psychotropic Medication, or Hospitalization. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had a care plan for Activities of Daily Living, Psychotropic Medications, Opiate Medications, and Hospice Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had a care plan for Activities, Psychotropic Medications, and Diuretic Use. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs.The findings included the following: Resident #5 1. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for and 1 of 3 medication carts (Hall 100 and 200 nurse medication cart) and 1 out of 1 med room reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the nurses cart #1 for 100 and 200 halls did not contain insulin, that were opened and not labeled with the open date. The medication room had an open vial of tuberculosis (a bacterial infection that affects the lungs and can spread to other organs) solution that was not labeled with an open date. Findings included:Observation on 07/28/25 at 4:30 PM revealed the nurse's medication cart #1 for 100 and 200 halls had the following opened medications with no open date labeled:1. Humalog insulin vials (Insulin is an essential hormone that helps the body turn food into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 staff (Medication Aide C) reviewed for infection control in that: -Medication Aide C did not sanitize or wash her hands before handling medication or in between administering medications to different residents. This failure could place residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: During an observation on 07/28/25 at 12:06 PM revealed Medication Aide C came out of a resident's room and proceeded to pour more medications without washing or sanitizing hands. Medication Aide C continued to not sanitize her hands in between the 12 residents she administered the med pass. During an interview on 07/28/25 at 12:07 PM, with Medication Aide C, she said she knew she was forgetting something. Medication Aide C said the facility policy and procedure was that all staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices was provided for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #26 and #52).The facility failed to ensure staff locked the breaks of the mechanical lift (device used to assist in lifting a resident) during transfer for Resident #26.The facility failed to ensure staff completed gait belt transfer correctly for Resident #52. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents in the building who required extensive assistance with proper transfers. The findings included: Resident #26Review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis, osteoporosis (bone thinning due to loss of calcium) without fracture, and contractures.Resident #26's Brief Mental Status was scored at 13 of 15 (indicating she was cognitively intact).Resident #26 had range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator door adequately closed and sealed in the kitchen on 07/27/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses and potential for injury to residents and staff. Findings included:During an observation and interview on 07/27/2025 at 9:42 AM, 1 of 3 refrigerators observed in the kitchen revealed the door did not latch or seal. The refrigerator door stayed slightly open. [NAME] G said the door must be lifted and closed at the same time. [NAME] G demonstrated closing the door. [NAME] G said dietary staff were aware of the broken door and how to close it. During an interview with [NAME] E on 07/29/2025 at 3:40 PM, [NAME] E said the refrigerator door had been broken more than one year. [NAME] E said she thought the Dietary Manager (DM) reported it to the Administrator. [NAME] E said if the refrigerator was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident , consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment which were to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #3's physical altercation with Resident #4 on 07/10/24. 2. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #4's incident on 07/10/24 with Resident #3 in which Resident #3 physical hit Resident #4. 3. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #5's physical altercation with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 washing machine and 1 of 4 resident wheelchair brakes reviewed for essential equipment. 1. The facility did not provide necessary repairs for 1 industrial washing machines. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair brakes were not broken These failures could place residents at risk of not having clean clothes to wear and place residents at risk of function mobility and injuries. Findings include: Observation and interview on 02/24/25 at 8:40 AM with Resident #1 revealed the right wheelchair brake would not disengage, and the handle was observed loose. Resident #1 was observed trying to move his wheelchair with his right arm/hand and moving slowly and veins in his arm could be seen popping out of his right arm/hand. Resident #1 did not have any legs as they were amputated. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 2:31 PM Resident #1 stated he told RN on 02/23/25 in the evening that his wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 2 of 2 (Broken blinds), 2 warped tiles, 3 holes in the walls, 1 exit door missing sweep of 4 exit doors, and 1 of 1 maintenance log reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the blinds were not broken. 2. The facility failed to ensure floor tiles were not warped. 3. The facility failed to ensure there were not holes in hallway 3 and a hole in the hall leading to the back smoking patio/laundry room. 4. The facility failed to ensure the hallway 1 Exit door was not missing a sweep and created a seal on the mid-top side of the door to not expose the outside elements. 5. The facility staff failed to input broken items into the maintenance work order log. These failures could residents at risk of living, working and visiting in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: Observation on 02/24/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible and includes ensuring that the resident could receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximized resident independence and did not pose a safety risk for 1 of 4 hallways (hall 100) and 1(Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for clean homelike environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Hallway 1 did not smell of urine. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not have a dirty bed linens. These failures could place residents at risk of residing in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/24/25 at 8:14 AM, with the Administrator, revealed her coming down hallway 1 to get state agency. Walking down the hallway smelled of urine. During an interview on 02/25/25 at 4:50 PM, with the Administrator, she stated the day the state survey agency was in hallway 1 and went to get him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's quarterly MDS, dated 01/2025, accurately reflected the residents' behaviors. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/25/25, revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #3's hospital history and physical, dated 07/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses which included Wernicke-Korsakoff disorder (a life-threatening brain disorder caused by a severe deficiency of thiamine, or vitamin B1), Dementia, and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #3's MDS, dated 01/2025, revealed a moderate cognitive impairment BIMS score of 12 to recall and or make daily decisions. Behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 (Resident #3) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to record Tramadol-50 mg Schedule IV tablet was given to Resident #3 at 7:30 AM per physician orders in the narcotic logbook. This failure could place residents at risk for being over mediated which could result in medical complications and drug diversion. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 02/25/25, revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's hospital history and physical, dated 07/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses which included Wernicke-Korsakoff disorder (a life-threatening brain disorder caused by a severe deficiency of thiamine, or vitamin B1), Dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three of eight residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for infection control. 1. MA A touched Resident #3's pills with her bare hands during medication administration. 2. LVN B failed to prevent cross contamination between Residents #1 and #2 by brining in uncleaned diabetic supplies from one room to another. These failures could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included: Review of Resident #3's CCD dated 11/01/23, revealed a 90- year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation (heart does not beat with a regular beat all the time) and acute respiratory failure (person cannot get enough oxygen). Review of Resident #3's MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for the residents on the 300 Hall reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure resident's room hand sinks maintained functioning hot water. This failure could place residents at risk for living in an uncomfortable, and unhomelike environment which could cause a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Observations on 06/11/2024 through 06/13/2024revealed the hand sinks in the rooms on hall 300 had no hot water. The hot water did not turn on at all. Interview on 06/12/24 at 01:33 PM with the Administrator revealed that Hall 300 did not have hot water for approximately 2 months due to a broken pipe. The Administrator stated the residents in hall 300 used the showers on Hall 200 and 400 which had hot water. The Administrator stated she had gotten several quotes and was waiting for approval from corporate. The Administrator stated she had received approval that morning, 06/12/24, to have the hot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 16 days in Quarter 2 2024 reviewed for Licensed Nursing coverage from January 2024, February 2024 reviewed for nursing services. The facility did not have the required 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage during the month of January 2024 (11 days) and February 2024 (5 days). This failure could place residents at risk for not having their nursing care and medical needs met. Findings included: Review of PBJ [Payroll Based Journal] Staffing Data Report, with a run date of 06/06/2024 revealed Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day was triggered for the fiscal year Quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31). The infraction dates were 01/01 (MO); 01/02 (TU); 01/03 (WE); 01/04 (TH); 01/05 (FR); 01/08 (MO); 01/16 (TU); 01/17 (WE); 01/18 (TH); 01/24 (WE); 01/25 (TH); 02/02 (FR); 02/08 (TH); 02/16 (FR); 02/21 (WE); 02/22 (TH). Record review of the January 2024 schedule/time sheets indicated no 24-hour licensed nursing coverage for any of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Residents #4 and #17) of 12 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: The facility failed to ensure CNAs A and B washed or sanitized their hands prior to putting on gloves and change their gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care while assisting Resident #4. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed her gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care while assisting Resident # 17 This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding include: RESIDENT #4 Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 06/11/2024 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 1 of 1 medication rooms inspected for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the medication room did not have an expired vial of Tuberculin (TB) medication in the refrigerator. (TB formula is used to test people for tuberculosis). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. The findings were: During an observation on 06/12/24 at 09:29 AM, the medication room was inspected with CMA D present. Inside the refrigerator was a 1 ml vial of TB formula with an open date of 04/29/24. The TB formula box indicated Discard opened product after 30 days. CMA D said she did not administer TB tests, so she was not aware of the expired formula. During an interview on 06/12/24 at 09:39 AM, the DON said the TB formula was supposed to be dated when opened and discarded or returned to pharmacy when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for one (Treatment Cart) of 3 medication carts reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to ensure the treatment cart was not left unlocked and unsupervised. This failure could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. The findings included: During an observation on 06/11/24 at 09:38 AM, the treatment cart was seen unlocked and unattended. Inside the cart were several types of medications such as antifungal creams, triple antibiotic ointments, scissors, nail clippers and several other medicated bandages. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 10:15 AM, the DON was made aware of the observation of the unlocked treatment cart. The DON said the cart was supposed to be locked when unattended. The DON said if the cart was left opened some of the residents could get into the cart. The DON said she was not sure who left it open and proceeded to lock it. The DON said it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-27 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of room change was received, including the reason the room was changed, for 2 (Residents #7 and #15) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of room change. -The facility failed to provide Resident #7 and/or their RP a written notice of a room change before the resident was moved. -The facility failed to provide Resident #15 and/or their RP a written notice of a room change before the resident was moved. This failure could place all residents at risk for being displaced without notice and/or reason and decrease quality of life being in a new environment. Findings Included: Resident #7: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 12/27/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area) and corticobasal degeneration (rare condition that can cause gradually worsening problems with movement, speech,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #15) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's bedroom entrance door and door to the restroom were not partially blocked by a dresser. This failure could place the resident at risk of decreased quality of life due to the lack of a well-maintained environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 12/27/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who as admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of lumbar vertebra, rheumatoid arthritis (chronic progressive disease causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility, especially in the fingers, wrists, feet, and ankles), and osteoporosis (bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the structure and strength of bone changes). Record review of Resident #15's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0729 — isolatedVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it received registry verification for 1 (CNA K) of 5 employees reviewed for registry verification prior to allowing an applicant to serve as a nurse aide in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA K had a current nurse aide certification while employed at the facility while actively providing care for residents. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving care from someone unqualified to provide care. Findings included: Review of a staff roster dated 12/20/2023 reflected CNA K had a hire date of 3/31/2023. During an interview and record review on 12/22/2023 at 10:45 a.m., the BOM reviewed CNA K's employee file which revealed CNA K's certification expired 11/08/2023, and she had worked since the expiration dated. The BOM said she was unaware that the certification was expired and did not know why CNA K had not renewed her certification. The BOM said the facility did not have a system to track the expiration dates and it was the responsibility of the department head to ensure certifications were up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for infection control practices in that: CNA A failed to perform proper hand hygiene and glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/04/21, revealed a 70- year- old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, contracture of muscle, hemiplegia (partial or total paralysis) and hemiparesis (slight weakness) dementia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 required extensive assistance with most activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. This places residents at risk of receiving outdated foods. The findings included: Observation of the dry storage on 4/18/23 at 8:15 AM revealed the following: - 1, 1-lb bag jet puffed mini marshmallows expired 1/17/23 - 6 white plastic bags with very small labels that read banana cake mix, no expiration date - 4, 1-gallon containers of Golden Italian dressing with packaged date of 11/19/19, no expiration date - 2, 1-gallon containers of Orange French dressing with packaged date of 12/20/18, no expiration date - 1, 5-lb container of Lite Chili Powder with expiration date of 9/9/16 - 1, 1-gallon container of dill relish with packaged date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 7 of 15 residents (Residents #13, #15, #16, #21, #26, #30, and #142) reviewed for care plans in that: 1. Resident #13 did not have a care plan to address cognitive ability or delirium, psychosocial well-being/ mood state, behavioral symptoms including the use of a wander guard, falls, nutritional status, or medication use including antidepressant, anticoagulant or diuretic use), diagnosis of seizures, anxiety, or stroke. 2. Resident #15 did not have a care plan for pain/neuropathy, presence of a pacemaker, intermittent explosive disorder, or wheelchair use. 3. Resident #16 did not have a care plan for dementia care, diabetic monitoring, limited vision, psychoactive medication use or blood thinner use. 4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 4 (Resident #3 and #142) residents reviewed for respiratory care was provided care consistent with professional standards of practice in that: Resident # 3's water bottle, oxygen tubing and plastic bag was not changed, labeled and dated according to policy. Resident #142's water bottle, oxygen tubing and plastic bag was not changed, labeled and dated according to policy. This deficient practice could affect residents who received oxygen treatments and result in respiratory infection. Record review of Record review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed admission date of 11/10/22 with diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes Mellitus. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 05/11/2023 failed to mention use of oxygen. Record review of Resident #3's medication profile dated 11/10/22 revealed an order for oxygen via nasal cannula continuously on 3 liters to keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication error rates of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.14 %, based on 2 errors out of 28 opportunities, which involved 2 of 8 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #25) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 and Resident #25 received prescribed Senna-Docusate 8.6/50 mg (stimulant laxative/stool softener combination medication) verses administered Senna 8.6mg (stimulant laxative only). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet indicated an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included Huntington's Disease (a condition that stops parts of the brain working properly over time), and constipation (having fewer than 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to wash her hands before or after incontinent care and did not change her gloves during incontinent care for Resident #19. This failure could place incontinent residents at risk for transmission of diseases and organisms. The findings included: Review of Resident #19's Resident Face Sheet dated 4/18/23 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Huntington's Disease (a condition that stops parts of the brain working properly over time. It gets gradually worse over time), Gastrostomy (feeding tube) status, pain, muscle spasms, aphasia (could not speak), contractures, stroke, lung cancer, dementia, repeated falls, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #19's Significant Change MDS, dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-12-27 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 (12/20/2023) of 4 days reviewed for nurse staffing information. The facility failed to post the required staffing information for 12/20/2023. This failure could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. Finding include: During observation on 12/20/2023 at 1:00 p.m., of the public access area nursing station located outside of the DON office, revealed a daily sheet posting information which included facility name, census, total hours for RNs, LVNs, CNAs, MAs, and shift times that was dated 12/18/2023. During observation on 12/20/2023 at 2:45 p.m., of the public access area nursing station located outside of the DON office, revealed a daily sheet posting information which included facility name, census, total hours for RNs, LVNs, CNAs, MAs, and shift times that was dated 12/18/2023. During an interview on 12/27/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11490 GATEWAY NORTH BOULEVARD PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| BOWERMAN, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/01/2009 |
| 1200 W 15TH STREET OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2025 |
| MALLIK, SUBODH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/17/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/17/2025 |
| GARCIA, CATARINA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675522. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.