Avir at Pecos
1819 Memorial Drive, Pecos, TX 79772 · For profit - Corporation · 89 certified beds · (432) 447-2183 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.06 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 7.5–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 4.9–17.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 3 days of 30 days reviewed for nursing services.The facility failed to have a registered nurse working on [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE].This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving advanced nursing skill of a registered nurse.The findings included:Record review of the Nursing Facility's Daily Staffing dated [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], revealed there was no RN assigned during those shifts.In an interview on [DATE] at 05:49 PM with the DON, she stated there were potential risks to residents not having an RN to provide services at least 8 hours a day, every day. The DON stated the potential risks to residents included the example of LVN's unable to call time of death, only an RN could, and if a resident was DNR (Do not Resuscitate), the LVN would still have to perform CPR.In an interview on [DATE] at 7:00 PM with the Administrator, he stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dignity.-The facility failed to maintain a working air conditioner in the facility van impeding the residents from being able to be taken out into the comunity to do activities. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life and compromise residents' dignity. Findings included:In a confidential group interview 4 of 6 residents voiced that they were not able to be taken into the community to do activities due to the air conditioner in the van not working. They stated that it had been about 6 months that it had been broken. They stated that it would be nice to be able to go out to the store or to do activities in the community.In an interview on 5/14/2026 at 3:24 PM with the Maintenance Director he stated that the air conditioner in the van had not been working for a year now. He stated that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to post in a location available for all residents, contact information including telephone numbers of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman program for the facility's postings for 53 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility's single Ombudsman Program sign was posted on a posterboard on a sticker with small print in the hallway that led to the 200 hall and was not viewable to residents. This failure could place residents at risk of not having access to signs informing them of their rights and resident advocacy groups.The findings include: Observation on 05/12/2026 at 3:00 PM revealed, the ombudsman contact information was posted on the wall leading into the 200 hallway, the contact information was small print on a white sticker. In a confidential interview, 4 of 6 residents did not know how to contact their ombudsman and did not know where they could find her information in the facility. An interview on 05/14/26 at 5:38 PM with the DON, she stated that postings had to be in a visible area where residents and family members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, for 2 of 4 halls observed for environment.The facility failed to ensure the shower room in the 300 hall was clean and free from black particles on the floor of the shower. The facility failed to ensure that the shower room in the memory care unit was free from exposed piping under the sink.The facility failed to ensure that four resident rooms were free from exposed piping under the sink.The facility failed to ensure that one resident room did not have a closet door off its hinge.This failure could place residents, who resided on the 300 and memory care unit, at risk for injury due to exposed piping and missing tiles and decrease in quality of life.Finding included:Resident #5 Record review of Resident # 5's admission record dated 05/13/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 05/05/21 and a readmission date of 12/29/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at S483.10(c)(2) and S483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #4, Resident#37 and #49)The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan included ADLs.The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's care plan addressed smoking,The facility failed to ensure Resident # 37's care plan addressed oxygen use This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for unmet care needs. Record review of Resident #37's admission Record dated 05/12/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with admission date 04/22/2026. Record review of Resident #37's history and physical dated 05/12/2026 revealed a medical history of the following: Acute Respiratory Failure with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 2 shower rooms reviewed for accidents.-The facility failed to properly store/dispose razors in the community shower room in the 300-hallway on 5/12/26.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents.Findings included:300 hallway community showerAn observation on 5/12/2026 at 10:28AM revealed a white plastic trash bag tied closed containing multiple disposable razors sitting on top of a container mounted on the wall in the 300 hallway community shower room. In an interview on 05/14/2026 at 8:30 AM with CNA B, she stated aides or the nursing staff were responsible for disposing razors in the sharps containers which were in the shower. CNA B stated the CNAs, and the aides were trained to notify the floor nurse if the sharps containers were filled or closed to be filled so they could be replaced. CNA B stated the potential risk of having exposed razors that were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 3 (Resident #23, #27, #33) of 3 residents reviewed for access to hydration. The facility failed to ensure staff provided access to hydration and provide fresh water and ice at bedside for Residents (#23, #27, and #33) .This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being dehydrated.Findings include:Resident # 23Record review of Resident # 23's admission record dated 05/13/26 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 09/01/25 and a readmission date of 10/06/25. Record review of Resident #23's diagnosis list dated 05/13/26 revealed a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbance (cognitive decline severe enough to impact daily functioning but exact cause cannot be definitively diagnosed). Record review of Resident # 23's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 03 indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (Residents #37, Resident #39 and #49) of 6 residents observed for oxygen management. The facility failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) in use signage was posted on the doorways of Resident #37, Resident #39 and Resident #49 to ensure smoking was prohibited. This failure could place residents at risk of This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health and at risk of fire hazards by not posting oxygen signs outside the residents' rooms. Resident #37Record review of Resident #37's admission Record dated 05/12/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with admission date 04/22/2026. Record review of Resident #37's history and physical dated 05/12/2026 revealed a medical history of the following: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 medication carts (200-hall) viewed for pharmacy services.-The facility failed to maintain a locked medication cart in the 200-hallway on 5/12/26.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents.Findings included:An observation on 05/12/2026 at 8:36 AM of an unlocked medication cart on the 200-hall There were no residents or staff observed in the hall.In an interview on 05/14/26 at 09:05 AM LVN C stated the Nurse or the Medication Aide administering medications at the time were responsible for making sure their Medication Cart was locked when left unattended. LVN C stated the potential risks of leaving medication carts unlocked include HIPAA or privacy violations. LVN C also stated other potential risk of leaving a medication cart unlocked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen.-The facility failed to label food items in the refrigerator and in the freezer on 5/12/2026 -The facility failed to keep containers of food in the refrigerator free of dried drippings on 5/12/2026-The facility failed to keep lids of containers free of dust in the dried food storage area on 05/12/2026-The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff used hair nets properly on 05/13/26 and 05/14/26-The facility failed to keep overflowing garbage in a container away from clean dishes on 05/12/2026 These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses from cross-contaminated food and beverages. Findings included: In an observation on 5/12/2026 at 8:32 AM a container of soy sauce located in the refrigerator had an unknown yellow jelly substance smeared on the container. In an observation on 5/12/2026 at 8:33AM a container of ranch dressing and a container of salad dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) plan that described the process for conducting quality assessment and assurance activities, including the process on how the committee would identify and correct quality deficiencies. The facility failed to have documentation and evidence of its QAPI plan being ongoing and comprehensive.This failure could affect all residents and result in quality deficiencies not being recognized and corrected.Findings included: Record review of the Nursing Facility's QAPI plan, the Nursing Facility's meeting template documents for 02/2026, 03/2026, and 04/2026, revealed the areas documented: Goal, Interventions, and Progress, were blank. The PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) for the mentioned 3 months had the same handwritten notes that read, past LSC (Life Safety Code) and Annual Surveys from 03/25/25-03/28/25, all deficiencies were identified with no current issues. The PIP also included ANE in-services were completed for the months mentioned.In an interview and observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and program, in which data was to be gathered and analyzed, and plans of action were to be developed, implemented, and evaluated to address adverse events related to potential deficient practice for 1 of 1 QAPI programs reviewed.The facility failed to conduct at least one performance improvement project (PIP) annually that focused on high risk or problem prone areas identified by the facility, through data collection and analysis.This failure could place residents of the facility at risk of the facility not developing, monitoring and implementing corrective actions for identified areas of improvement.Findings included: Record review of the Nursing Facility's QAPI plan, the Nursing Facility's meeting template documents for 02/2026, 03/2026, and 04/2026, revealed the areas documented: Goal, Interventions, and Progress, were blank. The PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) for the mentioned 3 months had the same handwritten notes that read, past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source, immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents #7, #44)The facility investigated but failed to report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #7 had an unwitnessed fall on 05/02/2026 that resulted in a laceration on the left side of the resident's forehead, and left wrist.The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #44 sustained an unwitnessed bruise to right eye and a laceration to forehead and was unable to state how the injury occurred on 05/09/2026.The facility failed to report when a pipe burst, and the sprinkler system malfunctioned on 01/27/2026. These failures could place residents who require assistance with mobility at risk for non-reported serious bodily injury. Resident #44 Record review of Resident # 44's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to show evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and failed to report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #7 and #44) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin.The facility investigated but failed to report to the State Survey Agency when Resident #7 had an unwitnessed fall on 05/02/2026 that resulted in a laceration on the left side of the resident's forehead, and left wrist. The facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for Resident #44 resulting in bruising around the right eye and a laceration above the right eyebrow on 05/09/2026. These failures could place residents in the facility with dementia at risk of not receiving timely investigations and reporting of injuries of unknown origin. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 7 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for base line care plans.The facility failed to develop Resident #4's baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission.This failure placed newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff, increase resident safety and safeguard against adverse events that are most likely to occur right after admission.Finding included:Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/13/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date 04/24/2026.Record review of Resident #4's Physician progress note dated 05/04/2026 revealed a past medical history of the following: Wound to the right fingers, Peripheral Vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene, for 1 Resident of 7 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for activities of daily living.The facility failed to provide Resident #4 with nail care on 05/12/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for embarrassment, injury, and infections.The findings included:Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/13/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date 04/24/2026.Record review of Resident #4's Physician progress note dated 05/04/2026 revealed a past medical history of the following: Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition that develops when the arteries that supply oxygen-rich blood to the internal organs, arms, and legs become completely or partially blocked).Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 2 resident 12 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #49) reviewed for foot care.The facility staff CNAs and licensed nurses failed to provide foot care for Resident #7 and Resident # 49 on 05/12/2026This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for poor foot health, decreased personal hygiene, and a decline in their quality of life.Findings included:Resident #7Record review of Resident #7's face sheet revealed resident was [AGE] year-old male with initial admission date 11/21/24 and re-admission date 10/10/25.Record review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 0, indicating Resident #7 was severely cognitively impaired. Under Section GG- Functional Abilities, it was noted Resident #7 was completely dependent with his personal hygiene, meaning the helper does all the effort to complete the task while the resident does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 shower rooms reviewed for infection control. -The facility failed to ensure plastic urinal that was hanging in the community shower room/ bathroom in the 300 hall was not full of urine. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.Finding included: In an observation on 5/12/2026 at 10:27AM of community bathroom in the 300 hallway revealed a plastic urinal hanging from the grab bar next to the toilet, it contained yellow tinged urine. In an interview on 5/13/2026 at 10:17 AM with CNA A, she stated that urinals were emptied and rinsed out after each use and should not be left in the shower room. She stated that that it was the responsibility of the CNAs to ensure this was being done. She stated that the risk would be that residents might use the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide training to their staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; and procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or the misappropriation of resident property, for 1 of 8 staff (DON) reviewed for abuse, neglect exploitation training. The facility failed to ensure the DON had completed their mandatory abuse annual training.This failure could place residents at risk of being cared for by untrained staff.findings included:Record review of the DONs Personnel file revealed the DON did not have current Abuse trainings completed.Record review of Personnel documents on 05/14/2026 at 11:00 AM with Human Resources revealed the DON's hire date 11/23/2009.In an interview with Human Resources on 05/14/2026 at 11:00 AM, she stated Nursing Management was responsible for making sure nursing staff was up to date with their trainings.In an interview on 05/14/2026 at 5:40 PM with the DON, she stated all staff were responsible for their own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the mandatory training on standards, policies, and procedures for an infection prevention and control program for 1 of 8 staff (the DON) reviewed for training, in that:The facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control training was provided to the DON.This failure could place residents at risk of illness due to lack of staff training. Findings included:In an interview and Record review of Personnel files with Human Resources on 05/14/2026 at 11:00 AM, it was revealed the DON did not have current Enhanced Barrier training completed. She stated Nursing Management was responsible for making sure nursing staff was up to date with their trainings.In an interview on 05/14/2026 at 5:40 PM with the DON, she stated all staff were responsible for their own trainings. The DON stated all staff were aware of the importance of being kept up to date with trainings. She stated she was responsible as the DON for nursing staff and self. The DON stated the potential risk of the Nursing Facility staff not having their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences, including ensuring the call light was within reach to request assistance, for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident# 1 had the call light within reach.This failure placed Resident #1 at risk for unmet needs, delayed assistance, increased fall risk, and potential injury.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/06/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE].Record review of Resident #1's History and Physical dated 02/27/2025 revealed an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with severe cognitive impairment (serious problems with memory and thinking), metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by illness or chemical imbalance), subclinical hypothyroidism (mild underactive thyroid), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 water dispenser reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure:A. The water dispenser that was used for the residents was clean and not soiled. B. The floors in the area where the water dispenser was housed were free of dirt.C. The floor tiles in the area where the water dispenser was housed were free of cracks. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: In an observation on 12/9/25 at 11:18 am, revealed a locked closet area off of the dining room with a water dispenser that was used for the residents. The water dispenser was soiled with dirt and dust on the top and sides of the unit. The interior portion of the water dispenser was soiled with dust and white spots. The base had standing water. There was a cup 1/2 filled with water sitting on top of the dispenser. The floors had dirt covering them and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner that was not open to the air. 3. The facility failed to remove potatoes in the dry storage when they were beginning to show signs of rot. 4. The facility failed to ensure expired food items were discarded by the expiration date. 5. The facility failed to maintain cleanliness in the kitchen. The dry storage had food particles on the floor, drawers had crumbs and a gritty substance in the bottom, the refrigerator had dried sticky substances on the bottom shelf, the floor in the dishwashing area had trash and debris in a corner and the juice spout had a sticky, reddish-brown substance build up on it. These failures could place residents who received prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical and electrical quipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The spray nozzle above the rinsing sink in the dishwashing room leaked, and the oven did not work. These failures could place residents who received prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness or undercooked food. The findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 3/25/25 from 10:00 am to 11:00 am in the dishwashing room, the spray nozzle above the rinsing sink had a steady flow of water coming out and flowing into the sink while in the off position. In an interview on 03/25/25 at 11:00 a.m., the Chef stated the oven is not working and the spray nozzle in the dishwashing room has leaked for several months. The Chef stated the ADM is aware of both. In an interview on 3/27/25 at 6:12 p.m., the ADM stated the request for the oven to be repaired was approved, now waiting for the service company. The ADM said the spray nozzle in the dishwashing area had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 was free of abuse on 03/20/25 when Resident #8 was hit on the arm and shoulder by CNA C. This failure was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The non-compliance began on 03/20/25 and ended on 03/21/25. The noncompliance was corrected by the facility before the survey began on 03/25/25. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The findings included: Review of Resident #8's face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a most recent admission date of 01/06/2025. He had diagnoses which included moderate dementia with behavioral disturbances, schizoaffective disorder, severe manic bipolar disorder with psychotic features, generalized anxiety disorder, intermittent explosive,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who receive medication or feeding through a gastrostomy tube receive the appropriate treatment to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 44) reviewed for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube ( A PEG is a tube that is inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach and used to administer nutrition). The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not lower the head of Resident #44's bed flat while the PEG tube feeding pump was still infusing the formula, during personal care. This failure could place residents of aspiration. The findings: Record review of Resident #44's electronic face sheet dated 03/27/2025 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, muscle weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #44's care plan revised 03/26/25 indicated in part: Problem: Dependent on tube feeding for nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN), for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 3 months (October 2024, November 2024, December 2024) reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to ensure RN coverage on 10/12/2024 and 10/26/2024. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff. Findings include: Record review on 03/26/25 at 4:05 pm of the Payroll Based Journal report (nurse staffing and non-nurse staffing datasets provide information submitted by nursing homes including rehabilitation services on a quarterly basis), run date of 3/21/25, for Fiscal Year 2025 Quarter 1 (October 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024) revealed no evidence of RN coverage on 10/12/24, 10/26/24, 11/9/24, and 12/21/24. Review of nurse staffing schedules for October 2024, November 2024, and December 2024 on 03/26/25 at 4:45 pm revealed no RN coverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #44) of two residents reviewed for incontinent care in that; CNA A failed to wash or sanitize her hands between glove changes while assisting Resident #44. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included: Record review of Resident #44's electronic face sheet dated 03/27/2025 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, muscle weakness and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #44's care plan revised 03/26/25 indicated in part: Problem: Resident is incontinent of bladder and bowel resident cognition is: unable to recall daily forgetfulness. GOAL: resident will be maintained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance devices was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #1). The facility failed to assess Resident #1 for safe transfer practices as she was non-weight bearing. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents in the building who required extensive assistance which could result in residents having pain, falls or injuries. The findings included: Review of Resident #1's Resident Face Sheet, dated 10/24/24, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, arthritis, dementia, muscle weakness, and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 8/12/24, revealed: She had a mental status score of 9 of 15 (indicating moderate cognitive impairment) She was dependent on staff for transfers from bed to chair. Review of current MDS did not indicate how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that: 1.The facility failed to label and date food items. 2.The facility failed to discard expired food items. These deficient practices could place residents who received prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings include: Observation on 02/20/2024 at 11:30 AM of the refrigerator revealed: Red gelatin dated 2/11/24, shelf life 3 days. Peanut butter and jelly mixture dated 2/16/24, shelf life 3 days. 5 pounds of ground beef in plastic zip lock bag, unlabeled, undated, no use by date. 20 corn tortillas in asealed bag unlabeled, undated no use-by date. 20 flour tortillas in a sealed bag unlabeled, undated, no use-by date. Observation on 02/20/2024 at 11:45 AM of dry pantry revealed: 10 oz sprinkles unlabeled undated, no use-by date. 16 fluid oz bottle of red food coloring expired 10/02/2020. 1 gallon of Karo Syrup expired 02/12/2022. 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #21, Resident # 35) reviewed for resident rights . The facility failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #21 prior to administering Zoloft, an antidepressant used to treat depression. The facility failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #35 prior to administering Paxil, an antidepressant used to treat depression. The facility also failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the benefits,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, for 14 of 92 days in July 2023 - September 2023 The facility had no Registered Nurse coverage on dates 07/15/2023, 07/16/2023, 07/22/2023,07/29/2023, 08/12/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/20/2023, 08/26/2023, 08/27/2023, 09/03/2023, 09/16/2023, 09/17/2023, 09/24/2023, 09/30/2023. This failure could affect all residents and put them at risk of their care not being overseen properly. The findings were: Record Review of the facility's time sheets from July 01, 2023- September 30, 2023 - on 02/22/2024 at 01:00 PM revealed there was no Registered Nurse coverage on 07/15/2023, 07/16/2023, 07/22/2023,07/29/2023, 08/12/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/20/2023, 08/26/2023, 08/27/2023, 09/03/2023, 09/16/2023, 09/17/2023, 09/24/2023, 09/30/2023. During an interview on 02/22/2024 at 01:21 PM with the Director of Nurses confirmed there was no RN coverage for the date listed above. The DON stated the facility has been trying to hire new RNs by having competitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 1 of 1 medication rooms inspected for medication storage. The medication rooms had an expired Tuberculin (TB) vial medication in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. The findings were: During an observation and interview on 02/20/24 at 03:12 PM the medication room was inspected with LVN C present. There was a small refrigerator that contained several medications to include an open box that contained a 5ml vial that contained Tuberculin. The date on the box indicated it was opened on 12/22/23. The box indicated Discard opened product after 30 days. LVN C said she was an agency nurse and was not sure who was responsible for making sure expired medications were removed from the medication room. LVN C said she had not noticed the TB medication had expired. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 4 medication carts ( Hall 100 nurse medication cart) reviewed for medication storage and failed to ensure all controlled drugs and biologicals were stored in separately locked and permanently affixed compartments for 1 of 1 medication storage compartments reviewed for labeling/storage of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure the hall 100 nurse medication cart did not contain expired insulin pens and had open dates after they were put into use. The facility failed to ensure stored discontinued controlled medications and biologicals were separately locked and in a permanently affixed compartment kept in the DON's office. This failure failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to wash hands or use hand sanitizer between glove changes during incontinent care while assisting Resident #43. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding include: Record review of Record review of Resident #43's face sheet revealed admission date of 09/07/23 with diagnoses of hemiplegia of right side (one-sided paralysis), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (condition where pancreas does not produce enough insulin), cerebrovascular disease (blood flow to brain is affected), He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #43's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: BIMS 09 -moderately impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for 2 of 15 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for infection control. Three facility staff (MT, HA A, and HSKG) failed to follow the facility's infection prevention protocol for COVID-19 by failing to wear appropriate PPE. MT entered the hot zone with N95 mask and no other PPE. HA A did not wear appropriate PPE for the warm unit. HSKG did not wear appropriate PPE going into hot zone and shower room. Shower room was not sanitized after Resident #1, who was on isolation for exposure to COVID-19. This failure has the potential to affect residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections, particularly COVID-19. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 1/26/24, revealed a female resident with an admission date of 12/10/20 and diagnosis that included dementia, anxiety, and type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to consult with the physician when the resident experienced a change in condition for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #3) reviewed for a notification of a change of condition, in that: Resident #3 was known to be covid-19 negative but roomed with Resident #4 who was known to be covid-19 positive. Facility failed to report to Physician that his patient Resident #3 was being roomed with a covid positive Resident #4. This deficient practice could place residents at risks of not having the physician contacted when they have a change of condition, and it could result in delay of medical treatment and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 1/26/24, revealed a male resident with an admission date of 3/17/23 and diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle wasting, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Record Review of the facility's covid-19 testing log dated 1/25/24 indicated Resident #3 was tested for covid on 1/21/24, 1/24/24, and 1/25/24 which all resulted as negative. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUADALUPE COUNTY HOSPITAL BOARD | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/01/2025 |
| 1819 MEMORIAL DRIVE PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| GANN, KODY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| 1819 MEMORIAL DRIVE OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| CERNA, ORVILLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2025 |
| CANO, NICOLAS | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675881. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.