Avir at Heritage
5437 Eisenhauer Road, San Antonio, TX 78218 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (210) 646-9576 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.2% | 14.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.1% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.57 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 29.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 33.8–59.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.5–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 29.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 27.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 25.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.0–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 93.6 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.16 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systemically organized medical records for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accurate records. 1. The facility failed to document wound care treatments for Resident #1 for two days - 05/22/2026 and 05/23/2026. 2. The facility failed to document wound care treatments for Resident #2 for one day - 05/31/2026. These failures placed residents at risk for untreated or unmanaged wound care by inaccurate and missing records documentation. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face-sheet revealed the resident an 86year-old, Female; with an admission date to the facility of 05/21/2026. Record review of Resident #1's Orders for May 2026 revealed diagnoses which included: muscle weakness (A lack of muscle strength), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (A Neuro Developmental disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #2 that included the resident's NPO status. This failure could result in residents not receiving proper care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 11/26/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included cerebral infarction (interruption of blood flow to the brain causing tissue damage), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy status (a surgical opening in the abdomen to allow the intake of food and medications). Record review of a significant change MDS submitted on 11/17/2025 for Resident #2, reflected the BIMS score was not assessed due to the resident's cognitive status.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff implemented EBP when providing care for Resident #2. This failure could lead to infection or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 11/26/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included gastrostomy status (a surgical opening in the abdomen to allow the intake of food and medications) and presence of urogenital implants (a catheter to allow the drainage of urine). Record review of a significant change MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #2, reflected the BIMS score was not assessed due to the resident's cognitive status. Section H0100 of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 1 of 4 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environmental concerns in that: The facility failed to repair a bathroom door, repair a broken toilet, and secure a sprinkler system access panel in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe. The findings included: Observation on 9/16/25 at 3:15pm with the Administrator and Maintenance Director revealed the following:a. There was a penetration (hole) which measured approximately 3 inches by 2 inches on the bathroom door in room [ROOM NUMBER].b. There was water running in the toilet which would also not flush in room [ROOM NUMBER].c. There was a sprinkler system access panel which measured approximately 1.5 ft by 1.5 ft on the bathroom wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 3 of 6 Residents (Resident #23, # 43, and #51) whose records were reviewed for care plan revision/timing, in that: The care plans of Residents #23, #43, and #51 were not updated to reflect thickened liquids. Thisdeficient practices could affect any resident and contribute to Residents not receiving the care and services they need. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 4/24/2025, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of gout (a form of inflammatory arthritis characterized by recurrent attacks of pain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and paraplegia ( is a form of paralysis that primarily affects the lower half of the body). Record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #23's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: 1. There were crumbs and paper food wrapping in the fryer. 2. There were sand-like particles on top of the dish washing machine. 3. Three packages of corn beef and a box of potatoes were undated in the refrigerator. 4. A box of corn dogs was unsealed and undated in the refrigerator. 5. A box of hamburger patties were unsealed in the freezer. These deficient practices could place residents who consume meals and snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. Observation on 04/25/2025 at 11:16 a.m. revealed crumbs and paper food wrapping in the kitchen fryer. During an interview with the Dietary Manager on 04/25/2025 at 11:27 a.m., the Dietary Manager confirmed the presence of crumbs and paper food wrapping in the fryer and confirmed the wrapper could potentially contaminate fried food items. 2. Observation on 04/25/2025 at 11:17 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program for residents with newly evident or possible severe mental disorder for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #63) whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to refer Resident #63 for a Level I screen after being diagnosed with a mental disorder. This deficient practice could affect residents with a mental diagnosis and can result in residents not receiving services as identified by PASARR. The findings were: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #63, dated 4/23/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: bipolar disorder (a mental illness that brings severe high and low moods and changes in sleep, energy, thinking, and behavior), schizoaffective disorder (chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions and paranoia), and hypertension (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare puree food by methods that conserve nutritive value flavor and ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 meal (lunch) reviewed, in that: 1. The Spinach, Macaroni and Cheese and Bread were not pureed to a pudding or mashed potato consistency as required for food served to residents who received a pureed diet. 2. The facility failed to follow the Puree Bread recipe for 4/24/2025 lunch. This deficient practice could place residents who received pureed diets at-risk for poor intake, difficulty chewing, and/or choking. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/25/2025 at 11:15 a.m. Dietary [NAME] C prepared the Pureed Bread by adding chicken broth to the bread by pouring out a pitcher with no measuring device and stirred until Dietary [NAME] C felt it looked like the correct consistency . The thickener was poured out of a container with no measuring device. She turned the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. While providing incontinent care for Resident #85, CNA A did not change her gloves or wash her hands after touching the bed remote before starting to provide care. CNA B did not change her gloves or wash her hands after touching the privacy curtain before starting to provide care. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. These findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #85's face sheet, dated 04/24/2025, revealed an admission date of 12/20/2024, and a readmission date of 04/16/2025, with diagnoses which included: Schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood), Post-traumatic stress disorder ( mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN E followed infection control practices during wound care for Resident #1 on (3) occasions on 4/3/25. This deficient practice may affect residents who require wound care treatments and could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, affecting all four limbs), Morbid Obesity (disorder that involves having too much body fat), Type 2 diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Neurogenic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with profession standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. 1. The facility failed to provide wound care treatments/dressing change to Resident #1' left ischium according to professional standards; in that LVN E did not clean the wound prior to applying clean dressing and did not secure the clean dressing once applied on 4/3/25. 2. The facility failed to provide wound care treatments/dressing change to Resident #1's right glute according to physician order on 4/3/25; in that LVN E applied a wet-to-dry dressing to Resident #1's glute when the order stated to apply hydrofera blue dressing. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for worsening wounds and/or infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's treatments were documented per facility policy on (2) occasions on 4/3/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, affecting all four limbs), Morbid Obesity (disorder that involves having too much body fat), Type 2 diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Neurogenic Bowel (lack bowel control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 1/31/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's responsible party was informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose alternative options is he or she preferred for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for the right to be informed and make treatment decisions. The facility failed to notify Resident #3's responsible party on 09/20/2024, prior to Resident #3 being referred to a Wound Care Physician for an evaluation and received a wound debridement. This failure could affect residents and/or responsible parties by placing them at risk of not receiving treatments or being informed of treatment options. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility for hospice respite services on 09/18/2024 and discharged from the facility on 09/25/2024 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Atherosclerosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined an individual may self-administer drugs in a safe practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for administration of medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 has a specific written order to self-administer her own medications on 03/18/2025 as per the facility policy for a nasal spray and eye drops. This failure could affect residents who self-administer medications by placing them at risk of not receiving their physician ordered medication treatment to meet their individual needs. Findings included: During an observation, 03/18/2025 at 9:39 a.m., Resident #1 was observed with Refresh Tears eye drops and Fluticasone Propionate (nasal spray) on Resident #1's bed side table. The Fluticasone Propionate had a pharmacy label and was prescribed to Resident #1. Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration of medications for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. MA A failed to administer Resident #1's medications and failed to observe Resident #1 take her medications on 03/18/2025. This failure could affect residents who receive medications from MAA by placing them at risk for medication errors and receiving less than therapeutic benefits from medications. Findings included: During an observation, 03/18/2025 at 9:39 a.m., Resident #1 was observed with a medication cup on her bedside table that contained 7 medications. The medications were Midodrine 10mg (prescribed for hypertension- the level of pressure of blood pushing against the heart arteries), Multivitamin (prescribed as a supplement), Tylenol 325mg (prescribed for general pain), Ferrous Sulfate 325mg (prescribed for anemia-reduced red blood cells), Docusate Sodium 100mg (prescribed for constipation), Vitamin C 500 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care with the Hospice agency, specific to each patient, for 1 Resident (R#3) of 6 residents reviewed for hospice services. Resident #3 was evaluated by a Wound Care Physician on 09/20/2024 and had a surgical wound debridement without hospice being notified of the evaluation and treatment. This failure could affect residents who received Hospice services by placing them at risk for services and treatments not being coordinated. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed Resident #3 was an [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility for hospice respite services on 09/18/2024 and discharged from the facility on 09/25/2024 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Atherosclerosis (a buildup of plaque in the blood vessels of the brain), Dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions) and Depression (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A wore a gown and gloves when feeding Resident #1 who had been identified as requiring contact isolation. 2. CNA D touched new and clean brief with his old and dirty gloves after cleaning Resident #2's bowel movement when CNA D provided incontinence care to Resident #2 on 02/13/2025. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 2/12/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (a condition characterized by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to follow up on a medication order resulting in the medication not being available for 10 days 02/13/2024-02/22/2024 and did not supply the medication out of the emergency kit for Resident #71. This failure could result in discomfort and pain, diminishing the resident's well-being and quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #71's admission record dated 2/14/2024 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old man readmitted to the facility on [DATE] (initial admission date 04/15/2023) with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes, below the knee amputation of the right leg, and hypertension . Record review of Resident #71's physician orders revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that was served at a safe and appetizing temperature for 6 (Resident # 4, #8, #15, #19, #44, and #80) of 21 Residents reviewed for palatable food in that: Residents #4, #8, #15, #19, #44, and #80 reported receiving cold food at mealtimes. This failure could place residents at risk of not being satisfied with their food or encouraged to increase their personal food intake with an outcome of weight loss and a diminshed quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 2/23/24, revealed the resident was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease with hemiplegia (a condition of impaired blood flow to the brain with body paralysis), major depressive disorder( a condition of persistent low mood), and hypertension( a condition of elevated blood pressure). Record review of Resident # 4's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 7 (Nurse cart 100) medication carts reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to ensure staff locked the nurse 100 hall medication cart when it was left unattended. This failure could result in harm due to unauthorized access to medications, misappropriation, and drug diversion. The findings were: In an observation and interview on 2/22/24 at 2:10 p.m. the nurse medication cart 100 was against the wall across from the nursing station and around the corner to the entrance to 100 hall. The cart was unlocked, the computer was open, and the sleep screen was up. There was a password list on a piece of paper taped next to the keyboard. All drawers to the cart were unlocked and able to be opened by the state surveyor. Over the counter medications and resident prescription medication cards were visible. The narcotic box was locked. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices , maintain medical records on each resident that accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: LVN A signed the Narcotic sheet for Resident #1 and had not initialed MAR (medication administration record), indicating inaccurate documentation. This deficient practice could result in misinformation about the professional care provided. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/1/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on 12//30/22 with diagnoses that included: [Left hemiplegia] paralysis of limbs on the left side of the body, [Schizoaffective disorder] a mental health problem where you experience psychosis as well as mood symptoms, and [ Anxiety] a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 7/14/23, revealed, focus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature, and prepared by methods which conserved the nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 of 1 meal (Lunch 01/12/2023) reviewed for food palatability and temperature, in that: 1. Resident #57 complained the food was not good and the meats were tough. 2. Resident #65 complained the food was not appetizing and often did not have flavor. These failures can place residents at risk for possible weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. The findings include: During an observation and taste test, with all survey team, of test tray on 01/12/2023 at 12:20 p.m., revealed items served: French onion pork chop, red potatoes, green beans, wheat bread and frosted (chocolate) cake. The topping to the French onion pork chop tasted like granulated Parmesan cheese and appeared that a bunch of Parmesan was clumped together as a pile. The flavor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (Main Kitchen), in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure an opened jar of cherries and an opened jar of sweet relish in the reach-in refrigerator were labeled with an opened date and or a used by date. 2. The facility failed to ensure an opened container of vanilla flavor, opened cooking [NAME], opened dry basil, opened apple cider vinegar, opened pancake syrup and 2 unopened jars of sweet relish in the dry storage area were labeled with an opened date, a used by date and/or received date or items were discarded due to being passed their usable dates. This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings were: 1. During an observation with the DM, in the reach-in refrigerator, on 01/10/2023 at 9:54 am., revealed an opened jar of cherries (received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOHDNR) was completely signed 08/10/2022 at the bottom of the form. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for residents' rights not being honored. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 01/12/2023, revealed re-admission date of 09/07/2020, originally 12/13/20007, with diagnoses that included: dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, insomnia, and other chronic pain. Further record review revealed resident noted as a DNR*COVID Vaccine-Up-to-Date* under the Advance Directive section. Record review of Resident #3's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary comfortable interior for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #2) whose equipment was observed for cleanliness. Maintenance and nursing staff failed to clean Resident #2's wheelchair. Resident #2's wheelchair had built up residue underneath the cushion on his wheelchair, on the frame and on the spokes of the wheels. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of unsanitary equipment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 1/13/23, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (mental deterioration due to general degeneration of the brain), Multiple Sclerosis (chronic, progressive damage to parts of the nerve cells in the brain) and Parkinson's Disease (progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to conduct an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 2 of 8 Residents (Resident #62 & Resident #18) whose records were reviewed for comprehensive assessments, in that: 1. MDS staff did not code on Resident #62's quarterly MDS that he had psoriasis on his upper and lower extremities. 2. MDS staff did not code on Resident #18's quarterly MDS that he had significant weight loss. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services as needed. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 1/13/23 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure (kidneys are unable to filter waste from your blood), Cognitive Communication Deficit (impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) and Psoriasis (skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #62) reviewed for ADL care, in that: Nursing staff failed to provide daily oral care, nail care as needed and to shower Resident #62 according to his shower schedule. These deficient practices could affect residents and could contribute to overall poor hygiene. The findings were: Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 1/13/23 revealed he was admitted to the facility o 1/22/22 with diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure (kidneys are unable to filter waste from your blood), Cognitive Communication Deficit (impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) and Psoriasis (skin disease). Record review of Resident #62's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure residents proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #62) reviewed for foot care, in that: Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #62 was on the list for podiatry care. As a result Resident #62 did not receive podiatry care at least 5 months. This deficient practice could affect residents and could contribute to overall poor foot hygiene and a decline in residents physical condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 1/13/23 revealed he was admitted to the facility o 1/22/22 with diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure (kidneys are unable to filter waste from your blood), Cognitive Communication Deficit (impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) and Psoriasis (skin disease). Record review of Resident #62's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #18) whose records were reviewed for Dialysis services, in that: Resident #18 did not receive Dialysis on 1/10/23 and nursing staff was not checking Resident #18's shut site as ordered per facility policy. These deficient practices could affect residents and result in a decline in physical health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet, dated 1/13/23, revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified Protein and Calorie Malnutrition, End Stage Renal Disease (gradual loss of kidney function) and Deficiency of Other Vitamins. Further review revealed he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #18's reentry MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain routine dental care for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #62) whose records were reviewed for dental care, in that: Resident #62 was not provided or referred for routine dental care This deficient practice could affect residents and contribute to a decline in resident's oral health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 1/13/23 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Acute Kidney Failure (kidneys are unable to filter waste from your blood), Cognitive Communication Deficit (impairment in organization/ thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) and Psoriasis (skin disease). Record review of Resident #62's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired and he did not have any teeth or had teeth fragments. Record review of Resident #62's Care Plan, dated 12/16/22, revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-23 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility and failed to post notice of the availability of such reports in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public for 1 of 1 facilities, for 2 of 4 days during survey. The facility did not have a sign posted indicating where the survey results were and did not have the survey results available and accessible to residents and visitors on 2/20/24 and 2/21/24. This failure resulted in residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents being unable to access prior survey results. The findings were: In an observation on 2/20/24 at 9:10 a.m. there were no signs indicating where the survey results were and no survey results were observed in the entrance, or common area lobby. In an observation on 2/20/24 at 11:45 a.m. at the nurse's station and entrance to the dining area, there were no signs indicating where the survey results were, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 11/01/2023 |
| 5437 EISENHAUSER RD OPCO, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/12/2026 |
| FREUND, NOCHUM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2025 |
| TRAVITSKY, AARON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/01/2025 |
| DAGAN, AMITAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/13/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/13/2026 |
| GOLDBERGER, FAIGY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/06/2026 |
| 5437 EISENHAUER RD PROPERTY OWNER, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| ANA TX HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2025 |
| ZARATE, RUDOLFO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675858. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.