No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avir at Sherman

1000 Sara Swamy Drive, Sherman, TX 75090 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 132 certified beds · (903) 891-1730 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 891-1730 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2023
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (87%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1001 E Sara Swamy Dr · (903) 892-1999 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
809 E Gallagher Dr · (903) 893-1700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.5 mi
3201 US-75 N · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1599 N Harrison Ave · (903) 892-7313 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.4%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.7%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.4%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.832.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.612.061.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.6%CMS range 34.9–61.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.8–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.15
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
87.1%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 76.8 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.15 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from a PASRR evaluation report into a resident assessment, care planning, and transition of care for one (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate PASRR Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) request form for OT and PT was submitted into the Texas Medicaid & Healthcare Partnership (TMHP) portal within 20 business days after the date of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting to facilitate services for Resident #1 as agreed upon in the meeting. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services that would enhance their highest level of functioning.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included intellectual disabilities (a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significantly below average cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #1. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection.Findings include: A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/30/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included seizure disorder or epilepsy (A seizure is a single, temporary disruption of brain electrical activity, while epilepsy is a chronic neurological condition characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and depression (a serious, common mood disorder causing persistent sadness, loss of interest, and physical/cognitive symptoms that disrupt daily life for at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for six of six residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6) observed during medication pass. 1. The Facility failed to ensure MA A followed the facility's policy on administering medications for Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 by prefilling the resident's morning medication prior to the administration time on 02/18/26. 2. The Facility failed to ensure MA B followed the facility policy on administering controlled medications for Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6 by prefilling the resident's medication prior to the administration time on 02/18/26. This failure could affect residents who received medications by placing them at risk for medication errors and/or receiving another resident's medication.Findings Included: 1. An observation, record review and interview on 02/18/26 at 8:15 a.m. revealed 400 MA A on hall preparing to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure completion of a discharge summary including a recapitulation of the resident's stay, and final status at discharge for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge summary. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not having complete records after permanent discharge from the facility and disruption in the continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/03/26, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 01/02/26 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), metabolic encephalopathy (disease affecting the brain leading to impaired brain function), unspecified protein calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake or absorption of protein and energy). Record review of Resident #1's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident's physician, when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to promptly notify Resident #1's physician when a change in condition was discovered for Resident #1. The physician was not made aware of the change in mental status that occurred on 11/27/2025. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation at the request of the responsible party. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physicians informed when there was a change in condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan, reviewed 12/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the Preadmission Screening and Resident Record review (PASRR) Level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility failed to submit the Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) form request by the specific deadline for Resident #2 for therapy services. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving or benefiting from specialized therapy and equipment services they may require. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 9/17/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy (neurological disorders that affect movement, posture, and muscle coordination, primarily caused by damage to the developing brain), Speech and Language deficit, Muscle Weakness (Muscle weakness refers to a decrease in the strength of your muscles, making it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for two of five shower rooms (shower rooms on 100 and 200 halls), 4 of 4 linen storage areas (3 blue carts (100, 200, and 300 halls) and 1 linens closet) reviewed for environment and 16 of 18 residents (Resident #14, Resident #19, Resident #58, and Resident #65) and 12 confidential residents reviewed for clean linens which included towels, and sheets. 1. The facility failed to ensure the shower rooms were cleaned throughout the day, kept orderly, and maintained in a sanitary and comfortable condition for resident use. 2. The facility failed to ensure there were clean washcloths for Residents #19, #58, and #65 on 06/04/25 and 06/05/25 for bathing. 3. The facility failed to provide clean bed linens for Resident #14's bed on 6/3/25 and 6/4/25. The failures could place residents at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Residents #227, #46, #32) of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to create a care plan that reflected Resident #227's preference for only female staff to provide her personal care. 2. The facility failed to create a care plan that reflected Resident #46's preference for only female staff except for CNA T (a male CNA) to care for her. 3. The facility failed to create a care plan that reflected Resident #32's highly impaired hearing, vision, and aphasia. These failures place residents at risk of not receiving care and services related to their identified needs to maintain or reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings Include: 1.Review of Resident #227 admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.89 %, based on 3 errors of 38 opportunities, which involved two of five residents (Residents #19 and #26) and two of five staff (MA C and MA D) reviewed for medication errors, in that: 1. MA C administered Vitamin B-12 1000 mcg instead of Vitamin B-12 100 mcg and failed to administer duloxetine 60 mg to Resident #19's on 06/04/25 as ordered by the physician. 2. MA D failed to administer Resident #26's folic acid 1 mg on 06/04/25 as ordered by the physician. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings include: 1. A record review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/04/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 07/19/22. She had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable for one meal (Lunch 6/3/25) observed for 3 out of 18 residents (Resident #227, Resident #56 and Resident #177) for food palatability and food form. The facility failed to provide palatable lunch meal on 6/3/25 for 3 residents. This failure could place residents at risk of decline in nutrition status, loss of appetite, and decreased intake placing them at risk for unplanned weight loss. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #227 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/13/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 5/6/25. Resident #227 had no impairment to her cognition and had a BIMS score of 15. Resident was to have a therapeutic diet while a resident at the facility. She had the following diagnoses: Diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), Malnutrition, Anemia (a condition marked by a deficiency of red blood cells or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility freezer were dated or labeled. 2. The facility failed to ensure during lunch service kitchen staff used proper hand hygiene while serving residents' trays on 6/3/25. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food contamination. Findings Include: Observation of freezer in the kitchen and interview with Dietary Manager on 06/03/25 beginning at 9:16 am: -clear opened to the air plastic bag with about 25 corn dogs, in an unsecured box labeled corn dogs. Dietary Manager stated the bag should be closed and proceeded to close it by making a knot on top. -clear opened to the air, plastic bag with about 30 1.5-inch circular disc inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (Resident #70, Resident #66, Resident #19, and Resident #61) of seven residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A used the required PPE for Resident #70, who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to her venous access device, while administering resident IV antibiotics on 06/04/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and LVN B decontaminate the glucometers which were used to obtain a fingerstick blood sugar on Resident's #70 and Resident # 66 when they failed to allow the glucometer that was sanitized with a germicidal wipe to air dry before returning the glucometer to the medication cart and laying it on top other supplies inside the medication cart. 3. The Facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet when ordered by the physician to maintain adequate nutritional status, to the extent possible to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #227) reviewed for nutrition: The facility did not ensure Resident #227's diet was consistent with physician's order on 5/8/25 for Diabetic Diet. This failure could place the resident at risk for weight loss and further decline in health. Findings included: Review of Resident #227 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/13/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 5/6/25. Resident #227 had no impairment to her cognition and had a BIMS score of 15. The resident was to have a therapeutic diet while a resident at the facility. She had the following diagnoses: Diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), Malnutrition, Anemia (a condition marked by a deficiency of red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one (Residents #177) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility nursing staff failed to document and assess Resident #177's returning vital signs, access site, and mental status after Resident #177 returned from dialysis treatment on 05/27/25, 05/31/25, and 06/03/25. This failure places residents in the facility who received dialysis at risk of not receiving proper care and coordination of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #177's Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of anemia (low iron), kidney disease, heart failure, and diabetes (high blood sugar) with a BIMS score of 15 (intact cognition). Resident #177 required dialysis services. Record review of Resident #177's care plan, dated 06/03/25 reflected The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one of two (Resident #43) reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43 received his ongoing psychiatric services. Resident #43's last psychiatric appointment provided was on 01/29/25. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving behavioral health services and a decline in quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #43 quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 12/01/19. Resident #43 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. There were no behaviors, signs of delusions or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring and administering of all medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of five residents (Resident #70) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed the manufacturer's instructions to prime (means removing the air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the pen is working correctly) the Humalog pen (Insulin Lispro) (Hormone) prior to dialing in required amount of Insulin to be administered to Resident #70. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving full dosage of medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #70's, Face sheet, dated 06/05/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with a readmission date of 05/08/25. Resident #70 had a diagnosis which included Type 2 diabetes (condition where the body cannot control blood sugar and use it for energy)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were only accessible by authorized personnel, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #71 did not have a medication named BioFreeze (a topical analgesic) at Resident #71's bedside table on 06/03/25. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to medications, resulting in harm, misuse of medication, drug diversions, and adverse reactions to medications due to improper storage. Findings included: Record review of Resident #71's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (loss of cognition), and cervical disc myelopathy disorder (compressed spinal cord in the neck), with a BIMS score of 14 (intact cognition). Record review of Resident #71's care plan revealed no indication regarding her ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident#3) of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's nails were cleaned and trimmed on 04/16/2025. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet dated, 04/16/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of myocardial infarction (heart attack), contracture ( the abnormal shortening of muscles, tendon, skin or ligaments leading to a fixed tightening that restricts normal movement), of left hand and left shoulder, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #3's MDS assessment 04/02/25, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #1 and #2 on 04/16/2025. This failure could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 1/1/2025, reflected Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included coronary artery disease (Damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessel), Hypertension, and Diabetes. Resident #1 had a BIMS of 12 which indicated Resident #1 cognition was moderately impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #13, Resident #40) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #13 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed. 2- Resident #40 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1- Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE]/2023 reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old female with initial admission date to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included coronary artery disease (chronic condition of plaque buildup in heart), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (heart doesn't pump enough blood for body needs), Renal insufficiency (poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen: 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility refrigerator, freezer and dry storage were covered and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A used appropriate hair restraint in the kitchen. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed, and food contamination. Findings included: Observation in facility's walk-in refrigerator on 05/21/24 at 9:31 AM revealed a packet of hot dog did not had an expiration date on them. Observation in facility's dry storage on 5/21/24 at 9:36 AM revealed a packet of tortilla in plastic bag did not had used-by date and a packet of cornflakes that was left open without an use-by date marked on it. Observation in facility's freezer on 5/21/24 at 9:32 AM revealed a packet of bread did not had an expiration date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 (200 hall nurses' medication cart) of 3 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall medication cart had: 1- 1 insulin pen for Resident #175 with an expired opened date. 2- 1 insulin pen for Resident #17 with an expired opened date. These failures could affect residents resulting in diminished effectiveness, and not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medications. The findings include: 1- Record review of Resident #175's Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia (too many lipids and fats in the blood). She had a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of five residents (Resident #24) observed for infection control. Facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident # 24. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: A record review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/30/2024, reflected Resident #24 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, need for assistance with personal care, and dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain). Resident #24 had a BIMS of 07 which indicated Resident #24's cognition was severely impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good personally hygiene for 4 out of 5 residents (#1, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care every two hours or as needed for Resident #1 on 4/22/24. The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care on a regular basis for residents #1, #3, #4, and #5. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, and loss of dignity. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Blindness of right eye category 3, blindness of left eye category 5, ankylosing spondylitis (autoimmune disease that includes pain and stiffness in the spine and may affect other joints), atrophic disorder of skin (a reduction in epidermal and dermal thickness of skin), mild…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of the discharge with the reasons for the discharge in writing, send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and failed to record the reasons for the discharge in the resident's medical record for 1 (Residents #1) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements. 1. The facility failed to initiate a 30-day discharge notice to Resident #1 and ombudsman on 08/28/23 when facility made decision based on inability to meet resident's needs not to readmit Resident #1 to the facility from the hospital. 2. The facility failed to have written documentation of facility's decision to not readmit Resident #1 from the hospital in resident's medical record. This failure could result in residents being discharged without appropriate reasons and documentation communicated to help with the transition of care. Findings included: Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge requirements. The facility failed to establish and follow a policy to address Resident #1's request to return to the facility after a hospitalization when facility initiated discharge on [DATE]. This failure could result in residents being discharged without appropriate reasons and documentation communicated to help with the transition of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet printed 09/20/23 reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cirrhosis of liver (permanent scarring that damages liver), diabetes, arthritis, uropathy (blockage in urinary tract), and kidney failure. Resident #1 was his own responsible party and had been discharged from the facility. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, for 2 of 2 residents who were involved in reportable incidents where there was an abuse or neglect allegation (Resident #47, and #56). The facility did not implement their abuse/neglect policy related to reporting and investigating allegations within time frames required by federal requirements when 2 residents were involved in altercations with other residents (Residents #47 and #56). This failure could place residents in the facility at risk for abuse and neglect. The findings included: Resident #47 Review of an undated face sheet revealed that Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, high cholesterol, left-sided paralysis, contracture of left hand and shoulder, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, vascular dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made for 2 of 2 residents who were involved in reportable incidents where there was an abuse or neglect allegation (Residents #47, and #56). The facility failed to timely report an allegation of resident abuse after the allegation was made to the administrator. This failure could affect all residents by placing them at risk of abuse if the reportable allegations are not reported timely after they are discovered. The findings included: Resident #47 Review of an undated face sheet revealed that Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, high cholesterol, left-sided paralysis, contracture of left hand and shoulder, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, vascular dementia (reduced blood flow to brain causing impaired memory and thinking), major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated, and failed to report the results of all investigations to HHSC within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 2 residents who were involved in reportable incidents where there was an abuse or neglect allegation Residents #47, and #56). The facility failed to properly investigate allegations of abuse or neglect for Residents #47, and #56. This failure could place residents at risk of allegations not being investigated. The findings included: Resident #47 Review of an undated face sheet revealed that Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, high cholesterol, left-sided paralysis, contracture of left hand and shoulder, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, vascular dementia (reduced blood flow to brain causing impaired memory and thinking), major depressive disorder, non-pressure ulcers of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (Residents #26, #44 and #52) of 24 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's contractures (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff) in her legs and preference to stay in bed were care planned for Resident #26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's lower extremities impairment was care planned for Resident #44. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's right side limited range of motion was care planned for Resident #52. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #13, Resident #45, Resident #54) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #13 had his fingernails trimmed. 2- Resident #45 had his fingernails trimmed and cleaned. 3- Resident #54 had his fingernails cleaned This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1- Review of Resident #13's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), muscle weakness, and lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5% for t of six Residents (Resident #60 and #62) reviewed for medication administration errors. Facility failed to ensure the medications were administered per the physician orders for Resident #60 and #62. 28 medications were administered, two of the medications administered were late. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: A record review of Resident #60's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including elevated blood pressure, muscle weakness, and dementia. Resident #60 had a BIMS of 12 which indicated Resident #60 was cognitively moderately impaired. A record review of Resident #60's physician's orders dated 3/29/23 revealed Resident #60 was to receive metoprolol tartrate tablet; 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, administering, and securing of medications for 1 medication carts (300 hall medication aide cart) of 2 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services in that: The facility failed to ensure medications in unsecure containers were immediately removed from stock. These failures could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings Included: An observation on 03/28/2023 at 11:45 AM of the Medication Aide Cart Hall 300 revealed the blister pack for Resident #12's clorazepate 15 mg tablet (controlled medication used for anxiety) had 1 blister seal broken and the pill was still inside the broken blister and taped over. In an observation and interview on 03/28/23 at 11:45 AM, MA C stated she was unaware when the blister pack seal was broken, and she was not aware of who might have damaged the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of five residents (Resident #17) observed for infection control. Facility failed to ensure CNA E perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident # 17. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection. Findings include: A record review of Resident #17's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including elevated blood pressure, dementia, and depression. Resident #17 had a BIMS of 14 which indicated Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Resident #17 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 03/29/23 at 9:58 AM revealed CNA E providing incontinent care to Resident #17. CNA E was observed completing hand hygiene before care, then she informed the resident she was providing incontinent care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
The other 115 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avir At BanderaBandera, TX 1 of 5Avir At Cowhorn CreekTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir At DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5Avir At LindaleLindale, TX 1 of 5Avir At StephenvilleStephenville, TX 1 of 5Avir at AdamsTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at Arbor TerraceSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeaumontBeaumont, TX 1 of 5Avir at BeltonBelton, TX 1 of 5Avir at BoerneBoerne, TX 1 of 5Avir at BradburnGrand Saline, TX 1 of 5Avir at CaldwellCaldwell, TX 1 of 5Avir at Camp WoodCamp Wood, TX 1 of 5Avir at Citizens TrailTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at ConverseConverse, TX 1 of 5Avir at GainesvilleGainesville, TX 1 of 5Avir at GarlandGarland, TX 1 of 5Avir at GiddingsGiddings, TX 1 of 5Avir at Heritage OaksLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at HillsboroHillsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at HoustonHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at Johnson CityJohnson City, TX 1 of 5Avir at KennedaleKennedale, TX 1 of 5Avir at KerrvilleKerrville, TX 1 of 5Avir at LongviewLongview, TX 1 of 5Avir at LubbockLubbock, TX 1 of 5Avir at Meadow CreekSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at MineolaMineola, TX 1 of 5Avir at New BraunfelsNew Braunfels, TX 1 of 5Avir at PatriotEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at PortlandPortland, TX 1 of 5Avir at Rose TrailTyler, TX 1 of 5Avir at San AngeloSan Angelo, TX 1 of 5Avir at SeguinSeguin, TX 1 of 5Avir at TexarkanaTexarkana, TX 1 of 5Avir at Tierra EsteEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Avir at Veterans MemorialHouston, TX 1 of 5Avir at WestonTemple, TX 1 of 5Avir at WinnsboroWinnsboro, TX 1 of 5Avir at WoodlandsEastland, TX

Showing 40 of 115; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2017
CASTANEDA, EDMUNDOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2022
CERISE, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/24/2014
1000 E SARA SWAMY DR OPCO, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
HYDARI, RAKHSHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/11/2025
1000 E SARA SWAMY DR PROPERTY OWNER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER NNN GROUP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
PETTY, ANDREWIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 10%Other / private 24%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$244per resident / day
operating cost
$7,426per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$230per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next