Avir at Snyder

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 44.6 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. CNA A failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #1 in the shower resulting in Resident #1 falling and fracturing her hip and ankle. Resident #1 had to be hospitalized and required surgical intervention. On 11/03/23 at 7:15 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 11/04/23 at 12:04 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk of harm and/or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/03/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old-female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure training and competency skills demonstrations for contracted certified nurse aides who provided activities of daily living services to residents for five of five contracted certified nurse aides (CNA G, CNA H, CNA K, CNA T, and CNA U) competency skills. 1. The facility failed to ensure contacted agency staff CNA G, CNA H, CNA K, CNA T, and CNA U received proper training. 2. CNA K failed to properly assist Resident 1 in the shower resulting in a fall where Resident 1 fractured her hip and required hip surgery. On 11/03/23 at 7:15 PM, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 11/04/23 at 12:04 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. The facility failed to train all contracted certified nurses aides showing they were capable of caring for residents.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 4 of 6 resident bathrooms (Rooms 10 , 22, 24, and 45) and 2 of 6 resident bedrooms in that: The bed/wall protector board (bumper board) in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose and not fastened to the wall.The shelf in the bathroom of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was not secured on the left side of the shelf, causing it to lean into the adjacent wall.The toilet tank lid in the bathroom in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] did not fit the toilet tank, which left an open space on both ends and exposed the water in the tank.Baseboard strips in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were not secured.Baseboard strips in the bathroom of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were not secured.The toilet in the bathroom of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose and could be moved 2-3 inches from left to right.The towel bar in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was not secured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 7 (1/5, 1/6, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, 1/24, and 1/25/2026) of 30 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight hours a day for 1/5, 1/6, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, 1/24, and 1/25/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care. Findings included: Record review of daily timecards dated 12/27/25 to 01/27/26 for RN A, RN B, and RN C revealed no RN hours for 1/5, 1/6, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, and 1/24/2026. Record review of daily timecards dated 12/27/25 to 01/27/26 for RN B revealed 5.40 hours for 01/25/26. Record review of the previous DON's hours undated revealed no RN hours for 1/5, 1/6, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, and 1/24/2026. During an interview on 01/30/26 at 11:00 a.m. with ADM, she stated there was no RN coverage for 1/5, 1/6, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, and 1/24/2026. She stated on 1/25/2026 there was 5.40 hours of RN coverage.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility failed to protect and promote the rights of 10 of 14 residents in that: The facility failed to ensure staff were not on their personal cell phones while providing care, which included peri-care to residents. This could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth.Findings include: During an interview with confidential residents at an undisclosed date and time ten confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs while performing care made them feel ignored, not a priority, embarrassed, concerned the CNA could make a mistake due to distraction by the cell phone conversation, and, most of all, their privacy was violated. During an interview ten confidential residents stated the use of cell phones by CNAs occurred on every shift. Confidential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to residents and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 10 of 14 confidential residents. The facility failed to ensure 10 of 14 confidential residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure, were provided information who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place the residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. In Interviews and Record Review during an undisclosed date and time, 10 of 10 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a Grievance anonymously, the Grievance procedure had never been discussed in Resident Council, and they had not observed a posting of the Grievance procedure in prominent locations. Residents stated they did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed on 01/28/26 to seal food stored in the dry storage and date food stored in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: The following observation was made on 01/28/26 at 01:10 p.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen:Bag of garlic with no date in the refrigerator. Dry Storage:Bag of pecans in zip lock bag not sealed.Bag of instant milk not sealed.Bag of Fast and Fancy Mousse mix in zip lock bag not sealed. During an interview on 01/29/26 at 06:00 p.m., [NAME] A stated all food in the refrigerator should be dated. She stated it was everyone's responsibility to seal, label and date food stored in the refrigerator and dry storage. She stated she received training on how to properly store food in the refrigerator and dry storage. She stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #15, Resident #19 and Resident #42) reviewed for infection control. CNA E did not change gloves between groin area and buttocks area when providing incontinence care to Resident #42. CNA F did not perform hand hygiene between all glove changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #15. CNA G did not perform hand hygiene or gloves changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #19. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of the admission record for Resident #15, dated 01/30/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #35) of 14 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to consistently supervise Residents #3 and #35 while smoking and failed to ensure the need for safety restrictions due to the absence of smoking assessments. These failures had the potential to result in resident harm, including burns or other smoking-related injuries.:A record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 1/30/26 revealed that Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia (decline in memory, thinking, and behavior), need for assistance with personal care, muscle wasting (reduction in muscle strength), and difficulty with walking. A record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed: Section C (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 2 of 2 meals reviewed for palatability. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 1 of 3 food forms served (puree) at 2 of 2 meals observed (01/28/26 dinner and 01/29/26 lunch). This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. Findings included: During an observation on 01/28/26 at 04:45 p.m., observed [NAME] A prepared a puree meal. Observation revealed pureed pork ribs with pea size chunks. Surveyor tasted puree pork ribs with pea size chunks that had to be chewed. Observation revealed puree whole butter corn with corn husks. Surveyor tasted puree butter corn that had corn hulls that had to be chewed. Observation revealed puree chili beans were runny. During an observation of a puree test tray on 01/29/26 at 01:14 p.m., observed puree ground pork and greens that had visible small pea size chunks. Surveyor tasted pureed pork and greens and both had small pea size chunks that had to be chewed. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one kitchen. A. Resident #7, #18, #53, #159 voiced concerned of cold food, flavor and/or texture. B. Six of the 12 foods sampled on the meal tray were cold. C. Two of the 12 foods sampled on the meal were salty. D. One of the 12 foods sampled on the meal tray was tough. These failures could affect the forms of food provided in the facility (regular, mechanical chopped and pureed) and could result in a decline in residents' consumption of food and residents to have unwanted weight loss. The findings include: On 10/13/24 during initial tour of facility, three residents (#7, #53, #159) voiced concerns of the food. During the initial tour process on 10/13/24 between 10:55 AM and 11:30 AM, 2 confidential interviews with residents revealed the following comments regarding the food at the facility, The food is not good and is cold at times.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to ensure foods were covered, labelled & dated. 2) The facility failed to protect foods from potential contamination. 3) The facility failed to ensure foods were stored under sanitary conditions. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne diseases. The findings included: - The following observation was made during a kitchen tour on 10/13/24 that began at 10:49 AM and concluded at 12:07 PM: - Dirty unknown black particles around the sink. - Dirty and sticky front doors of 2 freezers and 1 refrigerator. - Undated, uncovered, and unlabeled Sandwich inside the refrigerator. - Undated, uncovered, and unlabeled small donut shaped item on a tray inside the refrigerator - Undated, uncovered, and unlabeled round shape vegetable inside the refrigerator - Undated Swiss cheese inside the refrigerator. - Undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,631 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $15,631 — penalty dated 2023-11-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-02 for 17 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX