Avir at Temple West

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from psychosocial abuse and neglect for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure staff were not willfully abusing and neglecting Resident #1 as they did not assist her out of bed at a reasonable time which caused her to miss breakfast and lunch and remain in a soiled brief for long periods of time on a regular basis (no specific time frame), causing her to feel hungry and neglected. Resident #1 was consistently neglected and left in her bed for most of the day. An IJ was identified on 04/30/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:19 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/01/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, trauma,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for administration. The facility Administrator failed to ensure staff were not willfully abusing and neglecting Resident #1 as they did not assist her out of bed at a reasonable time which caused her to miss breakfast and lunch on a regular basis (no specific time frame). She was consistently neglected and left in her bed for most of the day. An IJ was identified on 04/30/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:19 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/01/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, injury,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation.The facility failed to ensure hair restraints were used by all Kitchen staff when entering the kitchen.The facility failed to ensure foods were properly distributed with professional standards for food service safety.This failure could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include:Observation of the facility kitchen on 12/16/25 at 9:14 AM, revealed the DM was not wearing a hair restraint while testing the dishwasher temperature. Observation of the facility kitchen on 12/17/2025at 1:35 PM, revealed the DM was not wearing a hair restraint while in the kitchen, obtaining policy and logbooks.Interview on 12/17/2025 at 8:07 AM the DM stated her expectation was employees follow the company wide sanitation policy. She stated if hair restraints were not worn, hair could contaminate the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency (HHSC), but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an incident of alleged abuse/neglect for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for harm to include physical abuse, a diminished quality of life, and psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 's face sheet, dated 4/15/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (occurs when the lungs fail to adequately remove carbon dioxide from the blood), Congestive Heart Failure (a condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to schedule an order to apply TED hose (stockings that prevent blood clots and swelling) to Resident #1's lower extremities while he was at the facility from 09/14/24 - 09/20/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/20/24. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included end-stage renal disease, type II diabetes , morbid obesity, gout (inflammatory arthritis), thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot inside a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 (Resident # 5, Resident # 25, and Resident # 39) of 13 resident reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5 and # 25's bedroom had no foul odors, the restroom floor did not have bags of soiled briefs in the corner by the toilet, and pair of pants with a soiled brief on the restroom floor. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 25's over bed table was clean and free from food and beverage debris. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5 and # 25's restroom baseboard was secured to wall and not a fall hazard. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5 and # 39's bed sheets were clean. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of infection and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 5's admission Face sheet dated 9/16/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of eight residents (Resident # 5, Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #20) reviewed quality of life. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's facial hair was removed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 6's, Resident # 7's and Resident #20's nails were cleaned and trimmed. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 5's Face Sheet dated,09/16/2024, reflected a 73 -year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications (a chronic condition that occurs when the body does not produce enough insulin), unspecified dementia without behaviors ( dementia- a general term for a range of brain conditions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices (covering waste receptacles, sanitizing the thermometer prior to use, cleaning the ice machine, cleaning the juice gun nozzle, cleaning utensil storage drawers, cleaning of ice scoop bin) were occurring in the kitchen. 2. The facility failed to ensure temperature logs were being completed. 3. The facility failed to ensure cleaning logs were being completed. 4. The facility failed to ensure all items were covered and stored properly. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 9/15/24 at 9:08 am of the facility kitchen reflected 55-gallon trash can in kitchen prep area without lid. Observation of utensil storage drawers with food debris and tiny bits of paper on bottom surface of drawer and lip of drawer where clean utensils were stored.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility was free of pests and rodents for the facility's only kitchen and dining room reviewed for physical environment. 1.The facility did not ensure the facility was free of flies and crickets in the kitchen. 2. The facility did not ensure the facility was free of flies in the dining room This failure could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Observation and resident interviews on 9/15/24 at 11:38 am of the dining room revealed flies throughout dining room in windowsills (20 counted), on resident tables, landing on resident plates of food. Resident # 5 said the flies were always terrible in the dining room. Residents were observed covering their drinks with paper towels to keep flies out. Resident # 13 said he brings his own personal fly swatter to the dining room with him because of the flies. Resident # 26 was observed swatting at flies with an assistive eating built up spoon as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to care for residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 4 residents (resident #17) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 was not given showers late at night since that was not his preference. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life. The findings include: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet revealed Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 01/10/2024 into the facility. Resident #17 has a primary diagnosis of bacterial infection (infection inside the body created by bacteria), resistance to carbapenem (when germs are not healed by antibiotics), acute respiratory failure (not enough oxygen or too much carbon dioxide in your body), and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). Record review of Resident #17's MDS assessment revealed a BIMS score of 15 which noted the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screenings were completed correctly and residents with a mental illness were provided with a PASSAR Level II assessment for 2 (Resident #33 and Resident # 32) of 8 residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. 1. Resident #33 did not have a new PASARR Level I although diagnosis of mental illness was diagnosed after the admission date. 2. Resident # 32 did not have a PASARR Level I completed correctly although diagnosis of mental illness was diagnosed upon admission. These failures could place all residents who had a mental illness or intellectual or developmental disability at risk for not receiving needed assessment, care, and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #33's Face sheet, dated 09/17/2024, reflected at [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain and maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents ( Resident #7) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plans for Resident #7 included ADLs. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate physical care. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 7's Face Sheet dated, 09/16/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of polyosteoarthritis, unspecified (five or more joints in the body have arthritis at the same time), anxiety disorder ( a condition in which a person had excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$7,257 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $7,257 — penalty dated 2025-05-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIR HEALTH GROUP — 116 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX