No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Nassawadox Rehabilitation And Nursing

9468 Hospital Road, Nassawadox, VA 23413 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (757) 442-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)5 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0570)
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 4 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
9536 Hospital Ave · (757) 442-6417 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens3.9 mi
4053 Lankford Hwy · (757) 442-8542 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion3.8 mi
4092 Lankford Hwy · (757) 442-6803 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Silas Ct · (757) 442-4121 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.1%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.5%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.9%94.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%14.2%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine32.8%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.4%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.381.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.401.481.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.9%CMS range 34.5–58.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.1–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.2–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
32.6%
Total nursing turnover
46.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 118.3 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

29
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2022-05-20)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2019-08-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 4 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · H2022-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to ensure the necessary treatment to prevent the development of a sacral pressure ulcer that was initially identified at an advanced stage (unstageable with 100% necrotic/dead tissue) resulting in harm for Resident #339. Resident #339 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, unspecified vascular dementia. Resident #339 clinical record review revealed a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sores Risk Assessment as being completed on 11/19/21 as being at RISK. On 11/25/21 a clinical record review revealed a second Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sores Risk assessment was completed as being at Moderate risk. The admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/23/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 14 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #339 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. The facility staff failed to assure Resident #79's bilateral pressure reducing boots were in place at all times. Resident #79 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident diagnoses included; pressure injuries related to a fall at home and remaining down for an unknown period of time, dementia, high blood pressure and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/25/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #79's cognitive abilities for daily decision making was intact. Resident #79 Physician's Order Summary included an order dated 4/21/22, for bilateral heel float boots at all times. May remove for activities of daily living (ADL) care, every shift. A nurse's note dated 4/24/22 at 6:06 p.m., read; the resident remains very confused. His vital signs are normal and he continues to take off the padded heel support boots and throw his legs off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility staff failed to notify the physician or the wound Nurse Practitioner of a deteriorating stage II pressure ulcer prior to advancing to an unstageable pressure ulcer for 1 out of 55 residents (Resident #291) in the survey sample. The finding included: Resident #291 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #291 included but are not limited to Parkinson disease and muscle weakness. Resident #291's admission Assessment (14-day) with an ARD of 03/19/22 coded Resident #291 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 99 indicating short and long term memory problems and severe cognitive impairment - never/rarely made decisions. Resident #291 was coded total dependence of two with toilet use, bed mobility and bathing, total dependence of one with dressing, personal hygiene and eating and for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Resident #291 was coded as having no mood, rejection of care or behavioral problems. Resident #291's person-centered care plan initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information gleamed during a complaint investigation, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services for 3 of 55 residents (Resident #189) in the survey sample. For resident #189, the facility staff failed to recognize, assess and provide the necessary care and services after the resident experienced a significant change in condition presenting as shortness of breath because of low oxygen saturation 87 percent on room air. At the hospital the resident was diagnosed with acute respiratory failure, severe sepsis, a urinary tract infection and severe dehydration evidenced by a blood pressure reading of 80/50, only 30 milliliter of dark urine when catheterized and dry tongue and mucous membranes and peeling lips. Resident #189's lab values were critical upon arrival to the hospital; they included a glucose of 515 mg/dl, BUN 120 mg/dl, creatinine 6.47 mg/dl and lactic acid 2.6 mmol/L, which required hospitalization and constituted harm. For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-20 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received emergency dental services promptly after referrals were made adequately while experiencing the acute dental problem for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #190), with dental concerns in the survey sample. The STAT (now) dental appointment ordered 3/1/22, was scheduled on behalf of Resident #190 on 3/10/22, with a local general practice dentistry office for 3/23/22, which was 22 days after the STAT order. Prior to 3/10/22, the facility's staff was unable to provide evidence of attempting to obtain a dental appointment for Resident #190 and there was no evidence in the resident's clinical record or elsewhere of what extenuating circumstances led to the delay in obtaining the STAT ordered dental appointment. constituting harm for Resident #190. The findings included: Resident #190 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on information from the family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to deposit monthly personal needs allowance funds in the account for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease Unspecified and Unspecified Dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/24/2023 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). He was coded to have short and long-term memory problems. An interview was conducted with the Resident Representative/Family Member #1 on 09/06/23 at approximately 11:10 AM. She stated that the facility has been withholding monies from Resident #1's personal account because he should be getting a $40 monthly allowance. An interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-07 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on information from a family interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure resident and other funds were not commingled with facility funds for six (6) of 6 reviewed resident accounts (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6), in the survey sample. The findings included: All six (6) resident statements of accounts were reviewed and noted to be commingled with other accounts such as care costs and direct deposits. The $40 personal allowances were not listed in the description on the resident's ledger. 1. Resident #1- On 9/6/23 at 11:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with Family Member #1 (FM #1). She said that she was going through financial hardship because the facility was keeping all her husband's money including her spousal support and the resident's $40 allowance. She stated, I have a (name of legal service) helping me to get my money. The administration and business office staff wouldn't talk to me when I called. They became his Rep., Payee in October (2022). She also said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to make sleeping accommodations for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #84), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #84 was originally admitted to the facility 4/27/22 and discharged from the facility 5/10/22. The current diagnoses included; sepsis, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atrial flutter and heart failure, skin tear to the left lower leg/cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/2/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #84's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bathing, extensive assistance of two people with bed mobility and transfers, eating, and bathing, limited assistance of one person with dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting supervision after set-up with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint investigation, observations and record reviews the facility staff failed to provide reasonable access to the facility by an outside entity which provided services to 4 residents (Residents #31, #39, #69 and #77) and failed to have written policies and procedures regarding visitation rights of residents receiving outside services in survey sample of 55 residents. The findings included: Four residents (Resident#31, #39, #69 and #77) received Brain Injury Services from an outside entity. The facility staff failed to provide reasonable access to the facility by an outside entity which provided services for 4 residents and failed to have written policies and procedures regarding visitation rights of residents receiving outside services. Four residents (Resident#31, #39, #69 and #77) received Brain Injury Services. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #31 included: Traumatic Hemorrhage of Cerebrum with loss of consciousness and obsessive compulsive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 3 out of 55 residents (Resident #74, 85, 30) were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive and 1 out of 55 residents (Resident #79) in the survey sample have collaborating documentation of code status throughout the clinical record. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #74 and or their Representative was given the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. Resident #74 was admitted to the nursing facility on 04/15/22. Diagnosis for Resident #74 included but not limited to cancer of the larynx (voice box). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) an admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/20/22 coded the resident with a 10 of a total possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #74's person-centered care plan with a created date of 04/19/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 3 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #78, Resident #79 and Resident #190. For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to ensure the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was accurately coded at section N0300 and section N0350. For Resident #79, the facility staff failed to ensure the admission MDS was accurately coded at section E0800. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to ensure the Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] was accurately coded at section L0200. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #78's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] was accurately coded under section N0300 and section N0350. Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include but not limited to Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #78's most recent Minimum Data Set(MDS) was a Quarterly assessment with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to adequately identify, keep systems functioning properly and implement necessary action plans to assure the provisions of quality care for the residents using the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) committee to identify quality deficiencies in the areas of Pressure Sores F-686 and Dental Services F-791 and the facility staff failed to conduct quarterly QA&A meetings. The findings included: On 5/19/22 at approximately 2:50 p.m., the QA&A interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated there was no evidence that QA&A meetings were conducted prior to her employment with the facility. The Administrator stated she accepted the position January 2022 and conducted the October, November and December QA&A committee meeting April 2022 and the January, February and March QA&A committee meeting May 2022. Review of the documentation for the April and May QA&A committee meetings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to provide two residents quarterly statements for 2 of 55 residents (Resident #24 and Resident #60), in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. Resident #24 was originally admitted to the facility 7/18/19 from the community. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/19/2022 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #24s cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as independent set-up help only with bed mobility, transfers and toilet use. Requiring supervision set-up help with dressing, eating, personal hygiene and bathing. On 05/11/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to purchase a current surety bond. The findings included: On 5/12/22 at approximately 6:40 PM., received document from Business Office Manager (BOM) concerning Surety Bond. It reads as follows: The Facility has a Surety Bond for (Amount listed) expires 11/03/23. Amount of residents with personal accounts: 57 residents with funds. 12 residents with 0 (zero) balance. Total (amount listed). Received a notarized Surety Bond Certificate from the BOM. The listing the bond number for (Operator identification and former name of the facility). As Principal in the penalty amount not to exceed (amount listed). Date 11/03/2020. Currently the facility is under a new name: (listed new name as of December 2021). On 05/20/2022 at approximately 3:45 p.m., the above findings were shared with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Corporate Consultant. An opportunity was offered to the facility's staff to present additional information but no additional information was provided.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure Comprehensive Care Plan Goals were sent upon transfer to the hospital for 2 out of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #47 and Resident #58. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Comprehensive Care Plan Goals were sent upon transfer to the hospital on 5/4/22 and 5/7/22 for Resident #47. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Anoxic Brain Damage, Bipolar Disorder and Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #47's most recent Minimum Data Set(MDS) was a Significant Change assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/15/22. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as a 15 out of a possible 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #47's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: .5/4/2022 08:13 a.m. Nursing Progress Note:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of 3 hospital discharges and 1 hospital transfer for 3 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #58, Resident #70 and Resident #36. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #58's hospital transfer on 4/3/22. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder and Dementia. Resident #58's most recent Minimum Data Set(MDS) was a Quarterly/Medicare 5 Day assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/12/22. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as a 15 out of a possible 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #58's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: .4/3/2022 20:01(8:01 p.m.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a family interview, staff interview, and review of the clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address rejection of care for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #48) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #48 was originally admitted to the facility 12/30/21 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; metastatic squamous cell carcinoma and encephalopathy. The significant change annual quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/2/2022 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #48's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. A review of the Wound Care Nurse Practitioner's (WCNP) progress notes dated 5/3/22, 5/10/22 and 5/17/22 revealed wound care had been consulted for an ustageable pressure ulcer to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to invite 2 of 55 residents, (Resident #75 and #60) in the survey sample to attend their person centered care plan meeting. The findings included: 1. Resident #75 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #75 included but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS), a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/22 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating no cognitive impairment. An interview was conducted with Resident #75 on 05/11/22 at approximately 4:49 p.m., who stated I do not recall ever being invited to attend a care plan meeting nor did I receive a letter to attend. On 05/12/22, an interview was conducted with the Social Worker (SW) at approximately 4:52 p.m., who stated, Resident #75 should have had her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide 1 of 55 residents (Resident #84) in the survey sample with as much information as possible to encourage a smooth transition from the facility to his private home after voicing a desire to be discharged . The findings included: Resident #84 was originally admitted to the facility 4/27/22 and discharged from the facility 5/10/22. The current diagnoses included; sepsis, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atrial flutter and heart failure, skin tear to the left lower leg/cellulitis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/2/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #84's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that 4 of 55 residents (Resident #85, #66, #13, and #69) in the survey sample who were unable to carry out grooming activities of daily living (ADL) were provided showers and nail care. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #85 who was unable to carry out activities of daily living was offered and received a scheduled twice-weekly shower to maintain good personal hygiene during the last 4 months and failed to ensure that fingernail care was provided. Resident #85 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to included but not limited to Contractures of both knees and lower legs, Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease. Resident #85's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a Significant Change Assessment with an Assessment Reference (ARD) of 4/28/22. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide necessary toenail care for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #13, a totally dependent resident for activities of daily living), in the survey sample. The findings include: Resident #13 was originally admitted to the facility 2/20/2014, was discharged to an acute care hospital 11/17/21 and returned 11/19/21. The current diagnoses; traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/13/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #13's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with personal hygiene and bathing. On 5/18/22 at approximately 12:50 p.m., Resident #13 was observed in bed. His hair was long and stringy and his toe nails were approximately 2.5 inches beyond the tip of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident didn't experience a reduction in range of motion of bilateral knees and failed to provide necessary services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #190), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #190 was originally admitted to the facility 2/23/2017 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Alzheimer's dementia, diabetes and a left jaw swelling. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/7/22 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems and severely impaired daily decision making abilities. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring total care of one person with bed mobility, transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility staff failed to assure dietary recommendations made by the Registered Dietitian (RD) were implemented for 1 out of 55 resident (Resident #291) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #291's admission Assessment (14-day) with an ARD of 03/19/22 coded Resident #291 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 99 indicating short and long term memory problems and with severe cognitive impairment - never/rarely made decisions. Resident #291 was coded total dependence of two with toilet use, bed mobility and bathing, total dependence of one with dressing, personal hygiene and eating and for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Resident #291 was coded as having no mood, rejection of care or behavioral problems. Resident #291's admission Assessment (14-day) with an ARD of 03/19/22 under section (K) Swallowing/Nutritional Status coded the resident for loss of liquids from mouth when eating or drinking while holding food in mouth/cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals. Resident #291 weight at 132 pounds. The MDS was not coded for weight loss. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide 1 of 55 residents (Resident #288) in the survey sample with respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #288's had an oxygen order prior to administering oxygen. Resident #288 was originally admitted to the nursing facility on 09/19/19. Resident #288's diagnosis included but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident #288's Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/14/22 coded the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 12 of a possible 15 with moderate impairment for daily decision-making. In section G (Physical functioning) the MDS coded Resident #288 requiring total dependence of two with transfer, total dependent of one with dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility and supervision with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to have a pharmaceutical system which assured timely receiving and accurate dispensing and destruction of medications for 2 of 55 residents (Resident #13 and 14), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to procure the anticonvulsive medication, Vimpat timely to prevent Resident #13 from missing dosages. and to ensure the medication is administered as ordered by the Practitioner. Resident #13 was originally admitted to the facility 2/20/2014, was discharged to an acute care hospital 11/17/21 and returned 11/19/21. The current diagnoses; traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/13/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #13's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section I (Active Diagnosis) the resident was coded at I5400 for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to assure the Licensed Pharmacist recommendation were reviewed and responded to by the Physician and/or Practitioner for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #37), in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to assure Resident #37's gradual dose reduction recommendation offered by the licensed pharmacist were acted upon by the Physician and/or Practitioner. Resident #37 was originally admitted to the facility 5/14/2021 resident had never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; dementia and Schizophrenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/9/22 coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired for daily decision making. A review of the Physician's Order Summary (POS) revealed an order dated 7/22/21 for Fluvoxamine Maleate ER…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the medication pass and pour observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and resident interview, the facility staff failed to ensure they were free of medication errors rates of five percent (%) or greater. During the medication passes totaling 25 observed opportunities for errors, two medication errors were made which resulted in a medication rate of 8%. The residents involved in the medications errors were Resident #55 and #28. The findings include: 1. Resident #55 was originally admitted to the facility 5/29/21 and had never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; dry eye syndrome. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/6/2022, coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #55's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 5/10/22 at 4:48 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 pulled one oral medication and looked through the medication cart for Resident #55's Artificial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assure a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 55 resident (Resident #13), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #13 was originally admitted to the facility 2/20/14, was discharged to an acute care hospital 11/17/21 and returned 11/19/21. The current diagnoses; traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a seizure disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/13/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #13's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In section I (Active Diagnosis) the resident was coded at I5400 for a seizure disorder or epilepsy. The Physician's Order Summary (POS) revealed an order dated 11/19/2021 for Vimpat Tablet 200 milligrams, Give 1 tablet by two times a day for seizures. On 5/18/22 at approximately 11:15 a.m., a review of controlled medications was conducted for Resident #13.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and a review of facility documents the facility's staff failed to ensure accurate documentation in one of 55 resident (Resident #66), clinical records. The findings included: Resident #66 was originally admitted to the facility 10/16/15 from an acute care facility and discharged on 4/11/22 to an acute care facility and returned to the Long Term Care Facility on 4/13/22. The current diagnoses included; Pneumonia and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/18/2022 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #66 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. In sectionG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility and dressing. Requiring total dependence of one person with toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. Requires set-up help only with eating. The care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to assure the Hospice Agency provided the facility staff with the coordinated plan of care to identify which services the Hospice Agency would provide, when the services would be provided, the communication process, and when or why the nursing facility staff should notify the Hospice Agency for 1 of 1 resident receiving Hospice services (Resident #36). The findings included: Resident #36 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital return anticipated on 2/3/2022. The resident's diagnosis included cirrhosis of the liver with ascites and a right inguinal hernia. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/21/22 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #36's cognitive abilities for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, review of facility documents and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility's staff failed to provide and or coordinate services for 1 of 55 residents (Resident #338, a closed record resident) a requested COVID-19 vaccine. The findings included: Resident #338 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay and expired in the facility on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; COVID19. The quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as not having the ability to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The staff interview was coded for long and short term memory problems as well as severely impaired for daily decision making. In sectionG(Physical functioning) the resident was coded as requiring limited assistance of one person with bed mobility, walking in the room and walking in the corridor. Requiring extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-08 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to send the comprehensive care plan goals upon transfer to the hospital for 3 of 56 residents in the survey sample (Residents #101, #61, and #128). The findings included: 1. Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Functional Quadriplegia and End Stage Renal Disease. Resident #101's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a Quarterly with an Assessment Date (ARD) of 6/20/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a 15 out of a possible 15 which indicated that Resident #101 is cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #101's Detail Discharge Report was review and is documented in part, as follows: 1/18/19 Discharge to Hospital. 3/25/19 Discharge to Hospital. 5/7/19 Discharge to Hospital. 7/18/19 Discharge to Hospital. 7/21/19 Discharge to Hospital. 7/26/19 Discharge to Hospital. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #129 was originally admitted to the facility for skilled services on 7/5/19 following a fall at home resulting in a left hip fracture and then readmitted on [DATE] after a hospitalization with diagnosis of Foley related sepsis Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), other diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (a dysfunction of the bladder) and dementia. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a 14 day with an assessment reference date of 7/19/19 coded the resident as having long and short term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The clinical record face sheet evidenced the resident was not his own responsible party. The resident representative was listed as a son. The resident was sent out to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital for a change in condition on 7/28/19. The resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the clinical record that the written notice which describes the bed-hold policy was provided to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to revise the care plan for three of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #80, #134, and #121. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to revise the care plan when it was determined her left pinky blister was caused from trauma rather than a burn on 7/2/19; and failed to revise the care plan when the blister had healed on 7/11/19. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, convulsions, and Schizophrenia. Resident #80's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/2/19. Resident #80 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #80's clinical record revealed that Resident #80 obtained a blister on 6/30/19. The following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs, Resident #121. The facility staff failed to implement non-pharmacological approaches prior to administration of the anti-anxiety drug Ativan and failed to obtain a stop date for as needed (PRN) Ativan. The findings include: Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, recurrent with severe psychiatric symptoms. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment reference date of 7/10/19 coded the resident as having long and short term memory deficits and severely impaired daily decision making skills. Under behaviors the resident was assessed as not exhibiting any physical or verbal behaviors or potential indicators for psychosis. And that the resident was not exhibiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner in the facility kitchen. The findings included: On 8/4/19 at 12:40 p.m., observation of the facility kitchen was conducted. On 8/4/19 at 1:10 p.m., an open container of ham was found in the reach-in refrigerator. The open date labeled on the container of ham documented 7/22/19. A second date on the container of ham documented 7/26/19. On 8/4/19 at 1:10 p.m., a pitcher that was half way full of tomato juice was also observed in the reach in refrigerator. 7/27/19 was the date labeled on the pitcher. On 8/4/19 at 1:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #7, the cook. When asked about the second date labeled on the ham, OSM #7 stated that the 7/26/19 date was the use by date and that the ham should have been thrown away. OSM #7 then stated that the ham was either old or staff labeled the wrong dates on the container. OSM #7 then threw the container away. When asked about the tomato juice, OSM #7 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain the facility dumpster in a manner to prevent pests for one of two facility dumpsters. The findings included: On 8/4/19 at 1:15 p.m., observation of the facility dumpster was conducted with OSM #7, the cook. One of two facility dumpsters had the doors open to the front and back of the dumpster. The dumpster was over full with trash. When asked who was responsible for maintaining the facility dumpster; ensuring it was shut and free from surrounding debris, OSM #7 stated that everyone (all staff) should make sure the dumpsters are shut and the surrounding area was clean, but that it was ultimately dietary's responsibility. When asked why the dumpster should be shut, OSM #7 stated to prevent pests from getting into the trash especially the feral cats that have been spotted in the area. OSM #7 confirmed that the dumpster was not shut. On 8/8/19 at 3:18 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the Administrator, and ASM #2, the ADON (Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide draping to prevent exposure of body parts and maintain dignity during the provision of care for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #124. The findings include: Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, stroke and diabetes. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) an annual with an assessment reference date of 7/1/19 assessed the resident as having long and short term memory deficits. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and was dependent for transfers. Under section M. Skin Conditions the resident was coded as having a stage IV pressure injury (defined in the MDS as-full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough, eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed). On 8/7/19 at 12:33 p.m., an observation of the sacral dressing change was conducted. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure medical equipment was maintained in good repair for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #78. Resident #78's mobility chair was observed to have areas that were ripped, torn and a piece of the foam arm rest was missing. The findings include: Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, seizures, traumatic brain injury, and spastic hemiplegia (Spastic hemiplegia is a neuromuscular condition of spasticity that results in the muscles on one side of the body being in a constant state of contraction) affecting the right side. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment reference date of 6/11/19 coded the resident as scoring a 12 out of a 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status), indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse policy to include conducting a reference screening for one (1) prospective employee out of 25 records reviewed. Review of personnel records obtained from facility revealed that no verification of reference screenings was conducted for a current employee, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #9. The findings included: On 8/8/2019 at approximately 1:20 p.m., the Human Resource (HR) Director was asked to provide evidence of reference screenings for CNA #9. The HR Director stated, I don't have one for her and I was not working here then. Facility policy on Abuse Prevention Program documented in part, the following: .2. Conduct employee background checks and will not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has: a. Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; b. Have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that a Quarterly Review Assessment was submitted no less than once every three months for 3 of 56 residents in the survey sample, (Residents #2, #3 and #4). The findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to Type II Diabetes Mellitus and Cerebrovascular Disease. Upon completing the Resident Assessment Task is was noted that Resident #2 was triggered for a Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) that was greater than 120 days late. Resident #2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a Quarterly with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/25/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was a 10 out of a possible 15 indicating that Resident #2 was moderately cognitively impaired but capable of some daily decision making. Under Section Z Assessment Administration: Signature of RN (Registered Nurse) Assessment Coordinator Verifying Assessment Completion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure an MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool) was accurate for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #121. Section E. Behaviors was not accurate for the quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date of 7/10/19. The findings include: Resident #121 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, recurrent with severe psychiatric symptoms. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment reference date of 7/10/19 coded the resident as having long and short term memory deficits and severely impaired daily decision making skills. Under behaviors Section E. 0200 A. the resident was coded as not exhibiting any physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing). Resident #121 required extensive assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to implement the physician's recommendations for treatment to a non-intact blister; failed to document when the non-intact blister had healed in the clinical record; and continued to treat the non-intact blister when it was already healed for one of 56 resident in the survey sample, Resident #80. The findings included: Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Parkinson's disease, convulsions, and Schizophrenia. Resident #80's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/2/19. Resident #80 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) exam. Review of Resident #80's clinical record revealed that Resident #80 obtained a blister on 6/30/19. The following nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and treatment to prevent and promote healing of a pressure injury for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #124. The findings include: Resident #124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, stroke and diabetes. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) an annual with an assessment reference date of 7/1/19 assessed the resident as having long and short term memory deficits. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and dependent for transfers. Under section M. Skin Conditions the resident was coded as at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and having a stage IV pressure injury (defined in the MDS as a full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough, eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed). On 8/7/19 at 12:33 p.m., an observation of the sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide a physician ordered safety device (a lidded cup) to promote safety for 1 of 56 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8. The findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to, legal blindness and history of major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. The current MDS (Minimum Data Set) a quarterly with an assessment reference date of 7/8/19 coded the resident as scoring a 6 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident was coded as requiring limited assistance with one person physical assist with eating, and transfers, and extensive assistance with one person physical assist with bed mobility, personal hygiene and dressing. The resident had limited range of motion to both upper and lower extremities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure one of 56 residents (Resident #128) in the survey sample was free from unnecessary medication; specifically excess units of insulin. The findings included: Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. The resident was on hospice care as of 8/4/2019. The latest diagnoses included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and pseudocyst of pancreas, and morbid obesity. Resident #128's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a 14 day scheduled assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/9/19. Resident #128 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) exam. A review of Resident #128's comprehensive care plan dated 8/1/2019 revealed, in part, the following documentation: Problem / Need. Risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure one of 56 residents was free from a significant medication error, Resident #128. The findings included: Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. The Resident was placed on hospice care as of 8/4/2019. The diagnoses included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, pseudocyst of pancreas, and morbid obesity. Resident #128's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a 14 day scheduled assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/9/19. Resident #128 was coded as being intact in cognitive function scoring 15 out of possible 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) exam. A review of Resident #128's comprehensive care plan dated 8/1/2019 revealed, in part, the following documentation: Problem / Need. Risk for hyper/hypoglycemia (high/low blood sugar) r/t (related to)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention for 2 of 56 residents in the survey sample. For Resident #12 the facility staff failed to perform wound care in a manner to prevent infection; and for Resident #129 the facility staff failed to maintain Foley catheter tubing and bag in a manner in accordance with infection control standards and practices. The findings included: 1. Resident #12 was originally admitted to the facility 08/19/10 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #12's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus without complications and Essential Hypertension. The Quarterly Revision Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/16/19 coded the resident as having short term and long term memory problems. In section G (Physical functioning) the resident was coded as needing limited physical assistance bed mobility, limited assistance with transfers, supervision with locomotion, limited assistance with dressing, limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0157 — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff and family interview and facility policy review, the facility staff failed to inform Resident Representatives of a change in condition for 1 out of 29 residents (Resident #3) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to inform Resident #3's Resident Representative of a change in condition. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the nursing facility on 8/1/11 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, Type II diabetes mellitus, metabolic encephalopathy, dementia and dysphagia (swallowing problems). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly dated 8/25/17 and coded the resident with short and long term memory problems and severely impaired in the skills necessary for daily decision making. Resident #3 was totally dependent on two staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). The resident was assessed with swallowing problems and on a mechanically altered diet. The person centered care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0280 — isolated
    Allow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to update a care plan give a resident the opportunity to participate in her care plan meeting for 2 of 29 residents (Resident #2 and #14) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #2's comprehensive care plan to include a fall that occurred on 09/04/17 and 09/14/17. 2. The facility staff failed to give Resident #14 the opportunity to participate in her care plan meeting. The findings included: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the nursing facility on 03/05/12. Diagnosis for Resident #2 included but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbances (1). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) a significant change assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/13/17 coded the resident with short and long term memory problems and with severe cognitive impairment - never/rarely made decisions. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #2 with total dependence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0309 — isolated
    Provide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview staff interviews, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for 1 out 29 Residents in the survey sample, (Resident #22). The facility staff failed to follow the physician orders for the administration of Zofran and MS Contin for (Resident #22). Resident #22 was originally admitted to the facility 09/08/16. Diagnosis included but not limited to Cancer, (1) and anemia (2). The current Minimum Data Set (MDS) an admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/16 coded the resident with a 15 out of a possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating no cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded Resident #22 requiring total dependence of one with dressing, hygiene, bathing and toilet use, extensive assistance of one with bed mobility and limited assistance of one with eating for Activities of Daily Living care. Resident #22's comprehensive care plan documented resident with a stage IV breast cancer - Resident #22 is at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0314 — isolated
    Give residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review the facility staff failed to follow wound care standard procedures to prevent the potential complications for two Residents (Resident #8 and Resident #11) in the survey sample size of 29. 1. The faciliy staff failed to ensure potential complications were avoided during wound care for Resident #8. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure potential complications were avoided during wound care for Resident #11. The findings included: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #11 included but are not limited to Cerebrovascular Accident* (1), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia* (2), and Krauosis Vulvae* (3). Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/18/17 coded Resident #11 with short and long term memory problems with moderate memory impairment. During an observation on 11/8/17 at approximately 9:45 a.m., of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0323 — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure safety measures to prevent a potential accident of cutting a Resident's skin, were utilized when cutting off a soiled dressing using pointed tipped scissors and not bandage scissors for 1 Resident, (Resident #11) in the survey sample size of 29. The findings included: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #11 included but are not limited to Cerebrovascular Accident* (1), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia* (2), and Krauosis Vulvae* (3). Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/18/17 coded Resident #11 with short and long term memory problems with moderate memory impairment. During an observation on 11/8/17 at approximately 9:45 a.m., of Resident #11's wound care for an Unavoidable Atypical Unstageable Facility Acquired on 7/24/17, Pressure Ulcer* (4). Resident #11 was lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2017-11-09 · tag F0441 — isolated
    Have a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and revised of the facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain an infection control program to provide a safe, sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmissions of disease and infection for 2 of 29 residents (Resident #8 and 11) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene during a sacral wound care dressing change for Resident #8. 2. The facility staff failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene during a right ankle care dressing change for Resident #11. The findings included: 1. Resident #8 was admitted originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis for Resident #8 included but are not limited to Type 2 Diabetes (1), and a stage IV (2) sacral wound pressure ulcer (3). Resident #8 Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/27/17 coded the resident with a 09 of a total possible score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.5+1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VA SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/31/2024
JJ UNITED TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/31/2024
TAYLOR, TENILLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2022
SHAPIRO, AKIVAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2022

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$795K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 10%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $795K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$292per resident / day
operating cost
$8,891per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$305per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495277. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next