Greene Acres Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 81.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to maintain the functionality of essential equipment for one of two water heaters.The findings include:A resident interview was conducted with Resident #5 (R5) on 6/15/2026 at 12:48 PM. During this interview R5 stated that the water is not always hot. R5 stated that the water heater occasionally trips out and that the receptionist's husband has to be called to reset the water heater for hot water to be returned. R5 stated they were unsure of the duration this has been occurring, but it had been going on for a while. During this interview, the hot water was run in R5's room and was observed to be hot.An interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director on 6/16/2026 at 11:00 AM. The maintenance director stated that the water heater had been cleaned in early 2024. He stated that the water heater would frequently go into lockout and need to be manually reset. He stated that after cleaning the water heater…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-10-27 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to inspect a bed frame and mattress for one of twenty residents in the survey sample (Resident #43) and failed to implement a facility-wide program for inspecting bed frames, mattresses and bed rails for possible entrapment risks and bed/mattress compatibility for sixty-nine of sixty-nine beds currently in use by residents. The findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, anxiety, dementia with behaviors, atrial fibrillation, mood disorder, deep tissue damage of right heel and depression. The MDS (minimum data set - cms assessment tool) dated 9/5/22 assessed Resident #43 with short and long-term memory problems and moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #43's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 8/31/22 for an air mattress to the bed for pressure ulcer treatment/prevention. On 10/26/22 at 10:21 a.m., accompanied by the licensed practical nurse unit manager (LPN #1), Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for two (Resident # 64 & #43) of twenty residents in the survey sample. Resident #64 was administered artificial tears solution instead of the physician ordered medicated eye drops (Refresh Optive solution). The medical devices (protective booties) were not applied to Resident #43's feet, as ordered by the physician. The findings include: 1. Facility staff failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, hypertension, dry eyes, anxiety and seizures. The MDS (minimum data set - cms assessment tool) dated 10/6/22 assessed Resident #64 as being cognitively intact for daily decision making. A medication pass observation was conducted on 10/26/22 at 7:54 a.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3, administering medications to Resident #64. Among the medications administered was artificial tears labled 0.2%-0.2%-1% (glycerin-hypromellose-PEG 400), of which two drops…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly place a catheter drainage bag below the bladder for one of 20 residents in the survey sample. Resident #31's catheter drainage bag was observed improperly positioned above the bladder level during the survey. The findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, contractures of the right hand, left and right knee, depression, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, sacral pressure wound, and multiple sclerosis. The most recent MDS (minimum data set -cms assessment tool) dated 8/24/22 was a Quarterly, which assessed Resident #31 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognitively intact for daily decision making. Under Section H - Bladder and Bowel, the MDS assessed Resident #31 as having a catheter and a colostomy. Resident #31's clinical record was reviewed, which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-03-04 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a Level I PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) was completed upon admission for two of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25 and Resident #29. Findings include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current readmission was on 01/18/21. Diagnoses for Resident #25 included, but were not limited to: arthritis, colitis, high blood pressure, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident as having short and long term memory impairment with modified independence in daily decision making skills. In Section A1500. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, it was documented that the resident had a serious mental illness. In Section A1510. Level II Preadmission Screening, it was documented that the resident had a serious mental illness and an intellectual disability. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-03-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a functioning call light system for two of 19 residents in the survey sample, Residents #12 and #35. The call light system for Residents #12 and #35 had been out of service for approximately three weeks. The findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, dysphagia, flaccid left-side hemiplegia, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, cerebral infarction and diabetes. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #35 as cognitively intact. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, history of transient ischemic attack, cerebral infarction, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and dementia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #12 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 3/2/21 at 2:28 p.m., Resident #35 was interviewed about quality of care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure assistive devices were in good repair for one of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #7. Resident #7's wheelchair arm pad was ripped and had jagged edges. The Findings Include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #4 included: paraplegia, urine retention with catheter, contractors, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/19/20. Resident #7 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. On 03/02/21 at 11:17 AM, Resident #7 was interviewed. During the interview Resident #7's wheelchair armrest was observed torn with jagged edges. Resident #7 was asked if that bothered him or irritated his skin. Resident #7 stated that it does scratch his forearm some but has not caused any abrasions. Resident #7 then lifted his right arm which didn't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate MDS regarding PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) status for one of 19 residents in the survey, Resident #25. Findings include: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most current readmission was on 01/18/21. Diagnoses for Resident #25 included, but were not limited to: arthritis, colitis, high blood pressure, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident as having short and long term memory impairment with modified independence in daily decision making skills. In Section A1500. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, it was documented, YES that the resident had a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability and to continue to Section A1510. for the Level II PASRR. In Section A1510. Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Condition, it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a medication pass and pour observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed during medication administration for two of 19 residents, Resident #31 and Resident #25. Findings include: 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility originally on 11/19/15, with the most current readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #31 included, but were not limited to: depression, dysphagia, and epilepsy (seizure disorder), mild cognitive impairment, and pain. The most current full MDS was an annual assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 15, indicating the resident was intact for daily decision making skills. On 03/03/21 at 8:00 AM, RN (registered nurse) #2 prepared medications for Resident #31. RN #2 had gloves on and began pulling medications to be administered. RN #2 opened a bottle of baby aspirin and poured one tablet out into her gloved hand and put it into the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one of 19 Residents, Resident #7. The Findings Include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #4 included: Paraplegia, urine retention with catheter, contractures, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/19/20. Resident #7 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. On 03/02/21 at 11:17 AM, Resident #7 was interviewed. During the interview Resident #7 stated that he had not had a shower in a week, and felt that he had to beg to get one. Resident #7 stated that there used to be a shower team at the facility, but now the facility has done away with the shower team. Resident #7 was observed with unkept hair and unkept facial hair. Review of Resident #7's bath documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $477K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA