Lake Mills Health Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 28.3 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.52 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.59 to 1.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 2 (R1 andR4) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a hospital discharge summary that included treatment for R1’s right ischium. This treatment was not picked up by the facility. On 5/14/25, the facility documented a stage 2 pressure injury (PI) to R1’s right buttock. Wound Physician-G’s treatment recommendation for the right buttock was not completed by the facility. On 5/27/25, the right buttock PI was noted to have declined, and Wound Physician-G changed the treatment orders. These orders were not picked up by the facility, and the facility did not develop a PI care plan for R1. The facility also failed to implement physician’s treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-03 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure 7 out of 8 staff members reviewed received behavioral health training to care for residents diagnosed with a mental, psychosocial, or other behavioral health conditions. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-Q, CNA-R, CNA-T, CNA-V, Registered Nurse (RN)-Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E, and Housekeeping-Z, did not receive behavioral health training.This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 29 residents residing at the facility that have the potential to experience behavioral health issues. Findings include:On 7/3/25, Surveyor randomly selected 8 facility staff members for review. Surveyor reviewed the employee records of CNA-Q, CNA-R, CNA-T, CNA-V, CNA-X, Registered Nurse (RN)-Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E, and Housekeeping-Z. The facility was unable to provide documentation that CNA-Q, CNA-R, CNA-T, CNA-V, Registered Nurse (RN)-Y, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E, and Housekeeping-Z, received the required behavioral health training within the year based on hire date.CNA-Q Date of Hire: 1/1/23 (did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider or a discharge summary that includes a recapitulation of the resident's stay to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for 2 (R2, R4) or 2 residents.* R2 has no documented discharge summary included recapitulation of R2's stay in the facility in R2's medical record. There was not documentation that R2 was explained or educated on medications, follow up appointments, self-catheterization or therapies that R2 was to receive after discharge home. * R1 had no discharge documentation, including a recapitulation of R1's stay, sent with R1 when R1 was discharged on 6/11 to an assisted living facility until R1 was already discharged from the facility and residing at the assisted living facility.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Transfer and discharge:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents with non pressure wounds received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed with a non-pressure wound.R1 was admitted with a right lower extremity wound on 5/14/25. On 5/21/25, R1's wound treatment was changed. The facility did not recognize the scheduled treatment, only the PRN (as needed) portion of the order was implemented. R1 was not provided with treatment to the right lower extremity wound from 5/21/25 to 5/27/25 when the wound was identified as being healed.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Pressure Injuries and Non Pressure Injuries and reviewed/revised 7/20/22 under policy documents: For those residents admitted with, or who subsequently developed a pressure injury or impaired skin integrity, they will receive care, treatment, and services that seek to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent further development of pressure injuries/impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure 1 (R23) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. R23 had a guided assist to the floor when being transferred with a gait belt and 1 staff member assist. R23 was assessed and the care plan documented R23 required a gait belt and 2 staff members assist with transfers. Findings include: The facility policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines revised on 7/18/2024 documents: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized plan of care to minimize the likelihood of falls or reduce the possibility/severity of injury. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. Suggested standard interventions may include: . c. Monitor for changes in resident's cognition, gait, ability to rise/sit, and balance. R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include transient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 2 (R7 and R23) of 6 residents reviewed. Registered Nurse Unit Manager (RN UM)-H and RN-G did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a treatment observation for R7. RN UM-H and RN-G were not aware of where PPE is kept for residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions. There was not an enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) sign on R23's door consistent with other residents identified as requiring EBP. Registered Nurse (RN)-I did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a treatment observation for R23. R23 has a stage 4 pressure injury to the left outer ankle requiring a dressing and did have light serous drainage on 3/25/2025. Findings include: The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution reviewed/revised on 8/8/2024 documents: It is the policy of this facility to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0882 — pattern
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility did not have a qualified Infection Preventionist who worked at least part time which had the potential to affect all 24 residents residing in the facility. *The Director of Nursing (DON)-B was serving as the facility's Infection Preventionist and did not have proper credentials. Findings include: On 02/08/24 08:53 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON (Director of Nursing)-B. DON-B informed Surveyor she had overseen infection control since August. Per DON-B, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A assists with Infection Control if the facility has a Covid outbreak. DON-B informed Surveyor she had not completed an infection control certification training program. Per DON-B she had started the CDC (Center for Disease Control) modules but had never completed them. DON-B stated she does plan on completing the training and taking the test. On 02/08/24 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A. NHA-A informed Surveyor he kept track of all the Covid testing and line lists during the facility's Covid outbreak in November. Per NHA-A, he is not Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure 1 (R11) of 5 residents were free from unnecessary medications. *R11 was prescribed Seroquel (Quetiapine) without adequate diagnoses, quantitative behavior monitoring and a lack of a timely Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMs) assessment. Findings include: Facility policy entitled, Psychotropic Medications, revised on 10/24/22 documented: Residents should not received psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrator by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication .The indications for use of any psychotropic drug will be documented in the medical record .Non-pharmacological interventions that have been attempted, and the target symptoms for monitoring shall be included in the documentation .Residents who receive an antipsychotic medication will have an AIMs test…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure 1 (R6) of 1 residents reviewed were free from significant medication errors. *R6 had an order for Apixaban that was transcribed incorrectly. As a result, R6 only received one dose of Apixaban instead of two from 10/31/23 to 11/27/23. Findings include: R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Hypertension and Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB) on Chronic Anticoagulation. Surveyor reviewed R6's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and noted the following active physician's order: Apixaban 2.5 mg (milligrams), one tablet twice a day, with a start date of 11/27/23. Surveyor noted the following discontinued physician's order in R6's EHR: Apixaban 2.5mg, one tablet at HS (hour of sleep). This order had a start date of 10/31/23 and a discontinued date of 11/27/23. Surveyor reviewed R6's progress notes and noted the following documentation: On 10/31/2023 a Pharmacy Review stated: Late Entry: (11/01/23)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and family interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R5 and R1) of 10 residents on the COVID-19 unit were allowed to receive visitors. R5 indicated the facility did not allow visitors on the COVID-19 unit during an outbreak in February of 2023. R1's family was not allowed to visit on the COVID-19 unit during an outbreak in February of 2023. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19: Visitation & Communal Activities/Dining policy, last revised on 10/4/22, indicated: This facility encourages residents to exercise their right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of another resident .The core principles of COVID-19 infection prevention will be adhered to and as follows: .d. Visitors should be informed about their potential to be exposed to COVID-19 infection in the facility. e. Hand hygiene, using an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure timely administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1 did not consistently receive R1's scheduled morphine (used to treat moderate to severe pain) timely. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 1/2023, indicated: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices .Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time .Unless otherwise specified by the Prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration schedule for the nursing center . On 10/9/23, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra (bone in spinal column). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/13/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$120,900 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $120,900 — penalty dated 2025-07-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE — 59 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $170K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI