Diversicare Of Bessemer

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 140.6 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2021-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure two of 34 sampled residents (Resident Identifier (RI) #74 and RI #69) received nursing care and services in accordance with physician's orders and/or care plans. RI#74 had significant scaly, scabbed, psoriasis noted on the skin of his/her scalp, back, and legs/feet. The skin assessments did not accurately record the resident's skin condition and a medicated cream prescribed by the physician was not implemented. RI #69 had a recent history of a fecal impaction. The resident complained of severe constipation during the survey. Staff failed to monitor and document his/her bowel movements to ensure he/she was not constipated. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated admission Record, in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed RI#74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, mixed incontinence, hypertension, pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions for one of eight residents reviewed for range of motion impairment (Resident Identifier (RI) #74). RI #74) had contractures, including to his/her hands with callused areas observed from where his/her fingernails dug into his/her palms in the sample of 34. The contractures developed and/or worsened over the past year. No interventions had been or were currently in place to address the limitations in range of motion. Findings include: Review of the undated admission Record, in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed RI #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, pain, and weakness. The diagnosis of contractures was not documented. Review of the hospital History and Physical in the resident's chart, dated 06/27/19, revealed RI #74 was admitted to the hospital and was dependent in activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview; document review; the Rules of the Alabama State Board of Health, Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), Chapter 420-5-10, Nursing Facilities; and the facility's job description for Dining Services Director/Account Manager; the facility failed to ensure the full time Dietary Manager, Employee Identifier (EI) #11, met the definition of a Dietary Manager per the rules of the State of Alabama. This had the potential to affect 130 of 130 residents receiving meals from the facility kitchen. Findings Include: The Rules of the Alabama State Board of Health, ADPH, Chapter 420-5-10, Nursing Facilities, original rules effective 8/23/1996 and last amendments effective 7/30/2016 included the following: . 420-5-10-.01 Definitions. (1) Definitions - (a list of selected terms often used in connection with these rules): . (b) These Rules - Rules 420-5-10-.01 through 420-5-10-.11, Chapter 420-5-10, Nursing Facilities, Alabama Administrative Code. (l) Director of Food Services/Dietary Manager - . who is a full-time employee, and if not a qualified dietitian, is one who: (1) is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the Resident Council Meeting on 11/30/2022, and a test tray on 12/01/2022; the facility failed to ensure scrambled eggs were served warm, palatable, and appetizing in appearance. This had the potential to affect 130 of 130 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: A Resident Council Meeting was conducted on 11/30/2022 at 11:00 AM with fourteen residents attending. During this meeting, the residents attending complained that hot foods were being served cold and the food did not taste good. On 12/01/2022 at 6:40 AM, the steamtable was observed to be setup with breakfast food items. The plate warmer not turned on. Employee Identifier (EI) #13, a Dietary Aide, turned on the plate warmer twenty minutes before the start of trayline. At 6:50 AM, the food thermometer was calibrated to 32 degrees Fahrenheit in an ice water slush by Dietary staff. At 6:55 AM, the Scrambled Eggs were 174 degrees Fahrenheit on the steamtable. At 7:00 AM, the Breakfast trayline started. EI #13, a Dietary Aide, was at the starter position, EI #15, a Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, the facility's policy for Food Storage: Cold Foods, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the facility failed to ensure: 1.) the dishmachine drain did not extend down into the floor drain, thereby creating the potential for backflow; 2.) food in the Walk-in Cooler was not stored on shelves that were less than six inches from the floor and with accumulated debris on the floor beneath the shelves; and 3.) the surfaces of the dishmachine wall, the shelf beneath the dishtable, and the interior of two food delivery carts were clean. This had the potential to affect 130 of 130 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1.) The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and the FDA included the following: . 5-402.11 BackflowPrevention. (A) . a direct conection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or UTENSILS are placed. On 11/30/2022 at 9:10 AM, Employee Identifier (EI) #10, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and the 2017 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Public Health Service and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was not littered with unneeded or discarded equipment, which could provide harborage for vermin. This had the potential to affect 138 of 138 residents in the facility. Findings Include: The 2017 Food Code of the U.S. Public Health Service and FDA included the following: . 6-501.114 Maintaining Premises, Unnecessary Items and Litter. The PREMISES shall be free of: (A) Items that are unnecessary to the operation or maintenance of the establishment such as EQUIPMENT that is nonfunctional or no longer used; . On 11/30/2022 at 8:50 AM, the dumpster area was observed with Employee Identifier (EI) #10, the Registered Dietitian (RD). There were nine wooden pallets stacked up by the facility building across from dumpster area. A hospital-style bed frame and mattress were observed beside the garbage dumpsters. A wooden door was observed leaning against the retaining wall behind the dumpsters. EI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, a copy of Your Resident Rights and Protections Under State and Federal Law, and the facility's Position Description for Maintenance Supervisor, the facility failed to ensure the building was in good repair as evidenced by stained ceiling tiles, loose hand rails, a loose door knob, holes in walls under residents' sinks exposing pipes and adjoining rooms, hole in wall in hallway, broken window with a cut edge open to outside elements/torn window screen, missing sheetrock behind a resident's toilet, toilets leaking/not flushing properly, missing/scraped paint on walls, doors and base boards, detached pieces on residents' doors, black residue under air conditioning (AC) units, sinks and smoke detector, loose baseboards, holes in resident walls, and torn sheetrock under sinks. This affected 3 out of 4 floors of the facility. Findings Include: A review of an undated document titled, Your Resident Rights and Protections Under State and Federal Law, revealed, . A nursing home must care for you in a manner and environment that promotes the maintenance and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, observations, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) 120's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Annual Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/07/2022 was accurately coded to reflect RI #120 did not have an indwelling catheter. This deficient practice affected RI #120, one of twenty-six sampled resident's whose MDS's were reviewed. Findings Include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual, dated October 2019, revealed: . SECTION H: BLADDER AND BOWEL Intent: The intent of the items in this section is to gather information on the use of bowel and bladder appliances, the use of and response to urinary toileting programs, urinary and bowel continence, bowel training programs, and bowel patterns. Each resident who is incontinent or at risk of developing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Chapter 4, the facility failed to ensure: 1) a nutritional care plan was implemented for Resident Identifier (RI) #76; and 2) an at risk and actual pressure ulcer care plan was implemented for RI #74. RI #74 developed a pressure ulcer to the sacrum 07/20/2022, which has since healed, however; the facility did not implement an at risk or the actual pressure ulcer care plan. This deficient practice affected RI #74 and 76, two of twenty-six sampled resident's whose plans of care were reviewed. Findings include: A review of the RAI Manual Chapter 4 October 2019 revealed . Chapter 4 Care Area Assessment Process and Care Planning . 4.7 . The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident's unique characteristics, strengths and needs. Develops and implements a intradisciplinary care lan based on the assessment information gathered throughout the RAI process, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of the Unit Managers Duties and Responsibilities, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #65's nebulizer mask was dated and labeled; and the nebulizer mask was stored in a bag on three of five days of the survey. This deficient practice affected RI #65, one of one resident observed with nebulizer equipment at the bedside. Findings include: Review of an undated UNIT MANAGER DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, revealed the following: . MONDAY • check rooms for correct dates and storage of 02 and nebulizer tubing. These are changed out, bagged, and dated weekly on Sunday night by night shift . RI #65 was was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure and Dyspnea. A review of RI #65's November 2022 Order Summary Report (Physician Orders) revealed RI #65 had an order to receive Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5 -2.5 (3) MG…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and review of a facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, the facility to store controlled refrigerated Ativan/Lorazapam in a secured non removable box in the medication room. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals with a revision date of 7/21/2022, revealed . Procedure .3.1.1 Store all drugs and biolgicals in locked compartments including Schedule II-V medications in a separately, permanently affixed compartments . On 12/01/2022 at 9:05 AM, an observation was made of the medication room with Employee Identifier (EI) #17, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The refrigerator had a clear secured box on bottom shelf with nothing in the box, two vials of injectable Ativan belonging to a resident was not in any box only in plastic bag on the shelf and in the locked refrigerator. A green box was on the top shelf with a combination lock. EI #17 was asked what was in the green box; she said an oral Ativan and an injectable Ativan. EI…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, the facility's Customer Concern / Grievance Communication Form, the facility's Resident Council Meeting minutes, the facility's Food Preference policy, and the facility's former Daily Alternate List; the facility failed to provide Resident Identifier (RI) #65's long-standing request for Chef Salad at supper on Monday nights and Cottage Cheese with Fruit at supper on Wednesday nights, which she had received for years. This affected RI #65, one of 130 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Include: The facility's Food Preferences policy, dated May 2014, included the following: Policy Statement It is the center policy that individual food preferences are identified for all residents . food and fluid preferences will be entered into the resident profile in menu management software system. Resident Identifier (RI) #65 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was last readmitted on [DATE]. RI #65's diagnoses included Anxiety Disorder, Type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $803K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL