Diversicare Of Oxford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 112.8 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs), review of the facility's investigative file and review of a facility policy titled, Elopement, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifiers (RI) #119, RI #88, RI #127, and RI #106 received supervision in a manner to ensure their whereabouts were known to the facility and the residents were in an environment free of accident hazards, failed to ensure its Wander Guard system alerted staff when RI #119 exited the facility, and failed to ensure RI #106 was supervised in a manner to prevent elopement after becoming agitated and stating he/she wanted to leave.The facility further failed to implement and follow fall precautions interventions for RI #60 a resident identified at risk for falls. Specifically: 1) On 01/26/2024 at 4:30 PM, (RI) #119 a resident with short term memory impairment was walking unsupervised on the side of a busy, high traffic intersection. RI #119 had a history of wandering behavior and was wearing a wander…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — widespread
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy titled Restorative Guidelines the facility failed to implement a functional maintenance program (FMP) following discharge from therapy for Resident Identifier (RI) #60 one of one residents who experienced multiple falls. This failure had the potential to contribute to decline in function and increased risk for further falls and had the potential to affect all residents requiring ongoing maintenance services due to the absence of a functional maintenance program. This deficient practices were cited as a result of the investigations of facility reported incident/complaint/report number 2800273.Findings Include:Cross-Reference F689 and F725A review of a facility policy titled RESTORATIVE GUIDELINE with an effective date of 2024 revealed,PURPOSE:Restorative services refer to nursing interventions that assist the resident in sustaining function and/or continue to progress toward functional goals.RESTORATIVE PROGRAM:A successful restorative program is dependent on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and the Center Assessment Tool the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs when the Registered Nurse (RN) #40 did not respond to a residents call light or notification of a fall, stating she did not have time because she was responsible for 50 residents. In addition, the facility did not have a restorative program to ensure residents maintained mobility and range of motion in place due to lack of staffing availability. These failures limited the facility's ability to provide timely care and services and had the potential to affect all residents who require nursing supervision and restorative services. This deficient practices were cited as a result of the investigations of facility reported incident/complaint/report number 2800273.Findings Include: The Center Assessment Tool update 3/9/2026 documented: .Other .When adjusting staffing for daily care needs, appropriate staff skill sets are reviewed to assure that licensed and no-licensed staff are always present, 24/7, including nights and weekends, with skills to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, reviews of residents' medical records, review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to protect the rights of residents to be free from abuse perpetrated by an employee of the facility and by other residents in the facility. Specifically: 1) On 08/05/2025 Resident Identifier (RI) #70 was physically abused by RI #106 and RI #126, when RI #106 and RI #126 struck RI #70 in the chest with their open hands. The facility failed to protect RI #70 from physical abuse. 2) On 11/19/2025 RI #102 was physically and verbally abused by a housekeeper, when the housekeeper hit RI #102 with her hand, on his/her back, and used profane language toward RI #102. The housekeeper yelled and cursed saying Don't ever do that shit again. to RI #102. The housekeeper reported the abuse to the Former Administration (FADM #8) who said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), the QAPI committee failed to identify all causal factors related to four elopements for Resident Identifiers (RI) #119, RI #88, RI #127 and RI #106 and to determine what corrective actions needed to be taken to prevent any further resident safety concerns.This deficient practice affected RI #119, RI #88, RI #127 and RI #106.These deficient practices were cited as a result of the investigations of facility reported incident/complaint/report numbers 447995, 447964, 2629802 and 2603429.Findings Include: Cross-Reference F689 and F725, A review of a facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, dated March 2025 revealed: Purpose The center develops, implements, and maintains an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focus on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the center provides. Definitions Adverse Event is an untoward, undesirable and usually…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and review of facility's policies titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, Medication Destruction, facility investigation files, and review of information from the Alabama Department of Public Health's (ADPH) Online Reporting System, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were secured from misappropriation and failed to identify, report, and investigate allegations in accordance with policies and regulatory requirements. The facility further failed to ensure proper medication destruction, failed to maintain accountability of discontinued medications, and failed to initiate timely reporting to the Alabama Department of Public Health.The deficient practice affected Resident Identifiers (RI) #12, #129, and #130 three of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property.Specifically:Former Licensed Practical Nurse (FLPN) #31 removed entire cards of residents' discontinued medications including Clonidine 0.1mg (milligrams), Prednisone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, and review of Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs), the facility failed to report an incident of physical abuse to the State Agency (SA) and an allegation of misappropriation to the SA within required timeframes. These failures had the potential to delay initiation of investigations and implementation of protective measures to ensure resident safety and protection.Specifically:1.) The facility failed to report an incident of physical abuse involving Resident Identifier (RI) #128 and RI #132 within two hours of the incident occurring. On 11/10/2025 around 11:35 AM RI # 132 entered the room of RI #128 and pinched him/her on the hand when RI #132 attempted to redirect RI #128 out of the room. The facility reported this allegation to the SA on 11/10/2025 at 5:12 PM. 2.) The facility further failed to report an allegation of misappropriation involving RI #12, RI #130 and RI #129 within 24 hours of the incident occurring. On 11/18/2025 at 5:00 PM the facility became…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record reviews and review of a facility policy titled Obtaining Patient/Resident Vital Signs, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 obtained and documented Resident Identifier (RI) #122's temperature on 03/01/2025, when RI #122 experienced a change in his/her condition. Failure to obtain and document RI #122's temperature, an indicator of infection, did not meet the standard of care for a resident experiencing change in his/her condition and placed RI #122 at risk for decline in condition, including worsening respiratory status and infection.This failure affected RI #122, one of one resident reviewed for change of condition during the survey.This deficient practice were cited as a result of the investigation of facility reported incident/complaint/report number 447989.Findings Include:An undated facility policy titled Obtaining Patient/Resident Vital Signs included the following: . Policy:Vital Signs will be obtained at a minimum . change of condition. in accordance with standards of practice. RI #122 was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2019-11-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2017 Food Code and review of the facility policy titled Waste Control, the facility failed to ensure the area around the outside dumpsters was free from discarded medical equipment, lumber and other debris on 11/24/2019. This had the potential to affect all 153 residents in the facility. Findings Include: The 2017 FDA Food Code included the following: . 5-501.15 Outside Receptacles. (B) Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE . shall be installed so that accumulation of debris and insect and rodent attraction and harborage are minimized and effective cleaning is facilitated around . the unit. 5-501.110 Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables. REFUSE . shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents. 5-501.115 Maintaining Refuse Areas and Enclosures. A storage area and enclosure for REFUSE . shall be maintained free of unnecessary items, as specified under . 6-501.114, Maintaining Premises, Unnecessary Items and Litter. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and review of a facility policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures Oral Inhalation Administration, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #50 was assessed to self-administer nebulizer treatments prior to the nurse leaving RI # 50 unattended during the administration. This affected RI #50, one of two residents observed receiving a nebulizer treatment. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures Oral Inhalation Administration, dated 06/15, revealed: . NEBULIZER- . L. Remain with the resident for the treatment unless the resident has been assessed and authorized to self administer. RI#50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Need for Assistance for Personal Care. RI #50's November 2019 Physician's Orders included an order for a nebulizer treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, and review of Resident Identifier (RI) #73's care plan for falls, the facility failed to ensure RI #73's care plan intervention was followed for use of a gait/transfer belt during transfer on 9/21/19. This affected one of 30 sampled residents for whom care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: RI #73 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Spinal Stenosis and Muscle Weakness. Review of RI #73's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 7/4/19, revealed RI #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated RI #73 had intact cognition for daily decision making and required extensive assistance of one person physical assistance for transfers. Review of RI #73's care plan with a Focus area for At risk for falls related to: . Use of medication, right sided weakness ., with a revision date of 10/14/19, revealed an intervention, with an initiation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$111,900 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $111,900 — penalty dated 2026-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $660K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AL