Diversicare Of Brookhaven

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 51.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from verbal, mental, and physical abuse for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 verbally and physically abused Resident #2 during incontinence care on 5/21/25 by striking the resident's legs, scolding him, and failing to provide care in a safe, supportive, and respectful manner, resulting in the resident experiencing fear, shame, emotional distress, and feelings of helplessness. Additionally, CNA #1 verbally and mentally abused Resident #3 on 5/21/25 by scolding and berating the resident for incontinence, causing the resident to feel humiliated, ashamed, and fearful that the behavior would recur. Findings Included: Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, dated January 2019, revealed, .Purpose: To prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect .Definitions: Abuse: The willful infliction of .intimidation .with resulting physical harm, pain or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen (02) before administrating for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for oxygen. Resident #27Findings include:A record review of the facility's Oxygen Guideline policy with an update of 8/1/24, revealed medical oxygen is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as a drug and therefore it is provided in accordance with a healthcare provider's order and in accordance with acceptable standards of practice .On 01/05/2026 at11:32 AM, in an observation of Resident #27 in bed eating lunch. Resident #27 has O2 flowing at 2 milliliters (ml).On 01/07/2026 at 8:20 AM, an observation of Resident #27 in bed oxygen flowing at 2ml.On 01/08/26 at 12:18 PM, in an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated they do not have standing orders. She stated we call the Nurse Practitioner (NP) for all orders. She confirmed oxygen is a medication and should not be given without physician order.Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food and maintain sanitary practices in accordance with professional standards for food safety related to foods not dated, staff touching the garbage can lid and then touching clean dishes, touching food that is ready to eat with hands, staff touching their face then touching the food thermometer, placing used water pitchers back on the shelf with clean dishes during two (2) of (2) kitchen observations.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Handwashing Procedure for Dining Services, undated, revealed .situations that require hand hygiene.After handling soiled equipment or utensils.After.touching your.face.A review of the facility's policy, Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 2/2023 revealed, .Procedures.5. All foods will be stored.labeled and dated.On 01/05/2026 at 10:08 AM, observation during an initial tour of the kitchen revealed Refrigerator #2 contained one (1) cup of what the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed to be thickened milk with no label or date. The DM acknowledged the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and for the use of oxygen (O2) therapy for two (2) of 20 care plans reviewed. Resident #2 and Resident #27.Findings include:A record review of the facility policy Care Plan with an effective date of October 2021 revealed Care plans will be developed for all patients and residents based upon the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual guidelines .On 1/6/25 at 1:30 PM, in an interview Resident #2 stated she was in the Army for 34 years. She stated she fought in a war and that triggered her PTSD. She was very vague and would not talk much about it. She was talkative about other things. No behavior noted during interview.On 01/07/2026 at 2:40 PM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1 stated residents have schizophrenia and get confused at times. She stated she is aware of PTSD and that should be on the care plan. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide activities and invitations to activities to meet the residents' psychosocial needs for one (1) of 17 residents sampled. Resident # 19 Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights and Quality of Life Policy, with an effective date of March 13, 2020, revealed, .A patient or resident has a right.To receive services in a center environment that is.comfortable with adequate space for activities.A review of the facility's Recreation Services Assessment dated 12/29/25 revealed the resident listed several activities that he would enjoy including Bingo.During an interview on 1/05/2026 at 11:15 AM, Resident #19 revealed he was new to the facility. The resident stated he was not interested in group activities but would like to participate in one-on-one activities. The Resident stated he has not been offered any opportunities for activities since moving into the facility.On 01/06/2026 at 9:40 AM, during an observation the Activities Supervisor (AS) walked from room to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during medication administration for one (1) of three (3) residents observed for medication pass (Resident #52).Findings include:Record review of the facility policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with an effective date of 11/1/2017 revealed .2. All team members shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures.8. Single use disposable gloves should be used.b. When anticipating contact with blood or body fluids; and C. When in contact with a resident, or the equipment or environment of a resident, who is on contact precautions .On 01/07/2026 at 8:10 AM, an observation of medication administration for Resident #52 was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. During this time, the nurse was observed administering a nasal spray, an inhaler, and a lidocaine patch. LPN #1 entered the resident's room and placed the medications on the bedside table without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect ongoing behavioral concerns and physical aggression for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings Include:A policy review of the facility's Care Plan policy dated 10/21 revealed culturally component goals and interventions for mood, behaviors, history of trauma, cognitive concerns. should be added to the comprehensive care plan .On 11/24/25 at 11:29 AM, in a phone interview, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 stated Resident #1 had been physically abusive toward her on multiple occasions, including hitting, kicking, and grabbing her. She reported the behavior to the Nursing Home Administrator and was moved off the resident's hall.On 11/24/25 at 12:18 PM, Resident #1 was observed calm in bed, oriented to two domains, intermittently providing appropriate responses.On 11/24/25 at 12:30 PM, CNA #2 stated she had witnessed Resident #1 become aggressive with CNAs.On 11/24/25 at 12:53 PM, Resident #3, the roommate of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinent supplies and services for one (1) resident with indwelling urinary catheter (Resident #4) and for three (3) incontinent residents out of six (6) sampled incontinent residents, Residents #1, #2 and #3. Findings include:Policy review of the facility policy titled Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance, undated, revealed the policy revealed, .Do not rest the bag on the floor .Empty the collecting bag regularly, as a standard of practice at least every shift The policy did not address necessity of physician's order for indwelling catheters. Record review of the Incontinence Care Statement dated 10/27/25 signed by the facility Administrator revealed the facility provides incontinence care and follows the audit tool; the document did not address incontinence supplies. Record review of the Peri Care Audit Tool, undated revealed, If Foley catheter present .maintains drainage. Resident #1, #2 and #3 Incontinence suppliesOn 10/20/25 at 9:10 AM the facility Ombudsman…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility staff failed to handle and transport linens in accordance with accepted standards in order to provide hygienically clean linens and prevent the spread of infection for one (1) of five (5) observations and failed to follow appropriate infection control practice for management of drainage system associated with indwelling catheter within accepted standards of practice for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #4.Record review of Facility History revealed the facility was cited 6/04/25 at level D for F880 for infection control due to improper handling of clean linen, therefore the scope and severity was increased to E.Findings include:Policy review of the facility policy titled, DESCRIPTION OF STEPS IN THE LAUNDRY PROCESS, Revision Date 10/25/16, revealed the policy stated, Soiled Linen containers or barrels should be on each Nursing unit stored in a soiled area so that nursing can deposit soled linen.it is very important to properly transport and store soiled linens to prevent the spread of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the right of the residents to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs to achieve independent functioning, dignity and well-being that reflect the resident's needs, specifically to call system within reach for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents, Resident #1 and Resident #4. Findings included: Policy review of the facility policy titled, Nurse Call System Effective Date 9/01/14, revealed the policy revealed, 2. Each cord needs to be visible and reachable by the resident to which it operates for . Resident #1On 10/20/25 at 1:25 PM during observation and interview with Resident #1 in his room revealed the call light for Resident #1 was attached to the transfer bar on the right side of the resident's bed by a clamp and not within the reach of the resident seated in his wheelchair on the left side of the bed. Resident #1 stated that he was not able to reach the call light.Record review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that protected the dignity and privacy of residents for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4). Specifically, the facility failed to maintain privacy during incontinence care for Resident #1 when staff provided care with the window curtain open, exposing the resident's perineal area; failed to provide a catheter bag cover for Resident #2 to maintain dignity; and failed to assist Resident #4 with meals in a respectful manner by standing over the resident while providing feeding assistance, rather than sitting at the resident's side. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights and Quality of Life, dated 3/13/20 revealed, .It is the policy of .that all residents and patients have the right to a dignified existence . A record review of the facility's Peri (Perineal) Care Audit Tool, undated, revealed Action including Staff must .provide privacy (door, window, room divider curtain .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-06-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $364K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS