Diversicare Of Sedgwick

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 51.1 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The sample included 15 residents, which included three residents selected for closed record review. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and service needed to manage symptoms when staff failed to promptly identify and react to a change in condition for Resident (R) 29, who had diabetes mellitus. On 05/04/25 R29 refused all his morning medication including his diabetic medications; R29's blood glucose was 388 milligrams (mg) per deciliter (dL) at 05:45 AM that morning. Staff did not notify R29's physician of the medication refusal or the abnormally high blood glucose level. On the evening of 05/04/25, R29 refused all his medications again and had a blood glucose of 513 mg/dL at 09:00 PM but staff did not notify the provider of the dangerously high blood glucose or the medication refusals. On the morning of 05/05/25, staff entered an order for a one-time dose of Humalog (fast-acting insulin) at 06:13 AM but the insulin was not administered as R29 was unresponsive and sent by ambulance to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 39 residents, with five residents reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to order and provide four days (11/01/21-11/04/21) of continued intravenous antibiotic treatment as ordered for Resident (R)7, who was continuing post-surgical recovery for osteomyelitis and gangrene (death of body tissue due to a lack of blood flow or a serious bacterial infection) treatment to his left foot. On 11/01/21 R7's Infectious Disease Provider prescribed Zosyn (antibiotic) intravenously (IV, through the vein) three times a day for an additional two weeks. The interruption in the IV antibiotic treatment for R7 resulted in worsening of wound and the potential for regrowth of the infection, osteomyelitis, and gangrene. Furthermore the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and care, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for Resident (R) 4, who had multiple wounds. Findings included: - Review of R7's diagnoses from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 48 residents. The sample included six residents with one resident reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) contained physician documentation of the rationale for the involuntary immediate discharge. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights and inappropriate discharge. Findings included: - R1's EHR documented diagnoses that included Huntington's disease (a rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration, a disabling central nervous system movement disorder), anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), history of suicidal behavior and major depressive disorder (MDD - a major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness).R1's Census log documented Discharge Paid dated 06/26/25, and Stop [NAME] dated 06/27/25.R1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Five Ceritifed Nurse Aide (CNA) were reviewed with three reviewed for annual performance evaluations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for two of the three CNA staff that were employed for a year or more. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - Per review of employee records, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) M was hired on 02/12/21. CMA M's annual Performance Evaluation, dated 02/13/25, was not completed with the employee's signature indicating it had been reviewed with the staff member. CMA N's employee records noted she was hired 05/08/20. CMA N's most recent Performance Evaluation, was completed on 02/27/24. On 05/14/25 at 09:21 AM, Administrative Nurse C verified the above findings and confirmed that direct care staff should receive an annual evaluation to include identified weaknesses and actions to address weaknesses to ensure the residents receive adequate care. The facility did not provide a policy related to annual performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment in all areas of the facility including the laundry area. This deficient practice created the risk for contaminated laundry and fires. Findings included: - During an observation on 05/13/25 at 09:30 AM, the fluorescent light fixtures above the washers and the dryers had no covers over the bulbs. There were several light fixtures that had exposed rust on the metal housings. During an observation on 05/13/25 at 09:35 AM, the ceilings above the washers and dryers had cracked and peeling paint. During an observation on 05/13/25 at 09:40 AM, it was observed that there was an open grate drain with standing water that the washing machines drained into in front of the washing machines. During an observation on 05/13/25 at 09:45 AM, the washing machine detergent hoses were fed through an open hole in the wall with an exposed dry wall just below a vent covered in lint and dust. During an observation on 05/13/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observation, the facility failed to implement professional standards of care related to infection control practices during direct care and laundry services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infections. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state (state of wakefulness accompanied by a complete lack of cognitive function), tracheostomy (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted), and Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). The 03/07/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R21 was in a vegetative state. R21 was dependent on staff for her care. The MDS noted R21 required a tracheostomy and supplemental oxygen. The MDS recorded R21 had a feeding tube and received her nutrition from it. It documented R21 had had a Foley catheter. The 03/07/25 Feeding Tube CAA triggered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 21, a resident in a persistent vegetative state (state of wakefulness accompanied by a complete lack of cognitive function) received adequate restorative care, including the application of splints, to minimize further decline. This deficient practice placed R21 at risk for increased pain and contractures (abnormal fixation of joints or muscles). Findings included: - A review of R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state. The 03/07/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R21 was in a vegetative state; R21 was dependent on staff for her care. The MDS noted R21 received no range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) exercise during the assessment period. The 03/07/25 Care Area Assessment (CAA) did not trigger for R21 for ADLs. R21's Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one reviewed for enteral nutrition (provision of nutrients through the gastrointestinal tract when the resident cannot ingest, chew, or swallow food). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 21, a resident fed by enteral means, received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding when staff failed to monitor R21's weight routinely and/or as ordered. This placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss and malnutrition. Findings included: - A review of R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state (state of wakefulness accompanied by a complete lack of cognitive function). The 03/07/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R21 was in a vegetative state; R21 was dependent on staff for her care. The MDS noted R21 weighed 145 pounds and she had no weight loss or gain since the last MDS. The MDS recorded R21 had a feeding tube and received her nutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents. There were 15 residents in the sample, with one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to care that were both clinically appropriate and person-centered for Resident(R) 12, who had a history of personal trauma and substance abuse. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life and re-traumatization. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress). The Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - Review of the Facility Assessment, updated 04/28/23, documented the facility would base the staffing plan on resident population and the needs of residents' care and support. The facility would require three to four licensed nurses (LN) providing direct resident care and seven to 12 Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) and/or Certified Medication Aides (CMA), every day, depending on the census and acuity (the level of care a resident requires) of the residents. Review of the facility's daily staff postings, from 06/01/23 through 07/16/23, revealed the facility staffed the nursing department with one to three LNs and four to seven CNA/CMAs per day. On 07/17/23 at 11:07 AM, R 22 stated the evening and night shift did not have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete annual competency performance reviews at least once every 12 months for five of the five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) and Certified Medication Aides (CMA) reviewed, CNA N, CNA NN, CNA OO and CMA T and CMA S, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of five employee personnel files, revealed employment by the facility for greater than one year, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S, hired 03/14/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. 2. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N, hired 12/18/14, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. 3. CNA NN, hired 05/24/17, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. 4. CNA OO, hired 06/27/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. 5. CMA T, hired 05/17/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. On 07/19/23 at 02:30 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, serve food to the residents in a sanitary [NAME] to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, regarding the failure of wearing hairnets, dirty reach-in freezers, and reach-in refrigerators and six plastic drawers which contained cooking utensils. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 07/17/23 at 11:12 AM revealed the following areas of concern: 1. Former dietary staff CC entered the kitchen and stood next to a food preparation table where staff were preparing food, on 07/17/23 at 11:18 AM. Former dietary staff CC did not wear a hairnet while she was in the kitchen where staff were preparing food for the residents. 2. The bottom of two reach-in refrigerators had a heavy build-up of food debris on the bottom shelf as well as a heavy build-up of food debris in the rubber door gasket seal around the reach-in doors. 3. The bottom of two reach-in freezers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,586 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $33,586 — penalty dated 2025-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $591K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS