Lampasas Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 28.3 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for two of two residents reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with post-surgery pain medication for more than 48 hours after admission, provide enteral feeding and hydration for more than 19 hours after admission, and provide colostomy/ileostomy (an opening in the abdomen for feces to leave the body) care to avoid fecal leakage, skin breakdown, and hospitalization.The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with the proper care and assessment to identify an injury of unknown origin that resulted in a large bruise across her chest and breasts.An IJ was identified on 11/18/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]. While the IJ was removed on 11/23/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 Resident reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure MA A notified LVN B on [DATE] when Resident #1's BP reading was 86/54 on [DATE], which is far from baseline. Resident #1 was sent to the ER on [DATE] and was diagnosed with Sepsis (a serious condition that occurs when the body has an extreme reaction to an infection leading to widespread inflammation and potential organ dysfunction.) and Hypotension (or low plod pressure is a condition where blood pressure is lower than 90/60 mm Hg. It can occur as a standalone condition or as a symptom of other health issues). Resident #1 died 2 days later while in the hospital. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 5:08 pm and an IJ template was given.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment dated [DATE] was updated to reflect all of Resident #1's current functional abilities. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate assessments and not receiving appropriate care according to their status.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's faces sheet dated 06/17/26 reflected an [AGE] year old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 04/15/26 and had diagnosis that included unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition (condition that occurs when the body does not receive enough protein and calories to maintain proper health), hypertensive urgency (severely elevated blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition characterized by insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for baseline care plans, in that: Resident #1 did not have a baseline care plan developed in 48 hours of his admission on [DATE]. This failure had the potential to cause residents to not be provided needed care to prevent injuries, feelings of helplessness and a diminished quality of life. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's faces sheet dated 06/17/26 reflected an [AGE] year old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission of 04/15/26 and had diagnosis that included unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition (condition that occurs when the body does not receive enough protein and calories to maintain proper health), hypertensive urgency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards.The facility failed on 04/13/2026 to ensure Resident #1 received 2 person assist when transferred, by use of mechanical lift, when CNA A was observed on AEM operating the mechanical lift alone. This failure could place residents at risk for falls, or skin tears.Findings include: Review of Resident #1's comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: non-traumatic brain dysfunction (brain injuries caused by internal factors rather than external physical trauma, leading to cognitive, physical, and emotional challenges), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients the body needs and the nutrients received), anxiety (temporary excessive worry or unease), depression (serious mood disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents or obtain them for 1 of 5 (R#1) residents reviewed for medication administration. MA A failed to accurately administer R#1's p.m. medications on 02/11/26. R#1 was observed with 4 medications on her face. This failure could place residents at risk of not accurately receiving their medications, which could result in a change in condition. Record review of R#1's admission record, dated 02/13/26, reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/11/26. She had medical diagnoses including displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg (a serious, unstable injury involving fractures of both the medial malleolus (inner ankle) and lateral malleolus (outer ankle/fibula), lack of coordination, need for assistance with personal care, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, epilepsy (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR Level I screenings.The facility failed to ensure the PASARR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, Resident #1 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder with an onset date of 09/17/2007.This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASARR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/22/2026, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an initial admit date of 07/23/2007. Pertinent diagnoses included: bipolar disorder, unspecified (a mental disorder characterized by periods of depression and periods of abnormally elevated mood that each last from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation.DC A failed to sanitize her hands in between tasks while preparing puree and taking temperatures. This failure could have placed residents at risk of foodborne illness.Findings included: Observation on 01/20/26, at 11:54 a.m., DC A failed to wash her hands after each transition to a new task, while preparing puree and taking the temperatures of food items placed in the hot tray. During an interview on 01/21/26 at 11:12 a.m., DS A stated she expects all staff in the kitchen to wear hair nets throughout their entire time in the kitchen. She said that all staff in the kitchen should always be practicing hand hygiene by properly washing their hands or changing gloves after each task or if touching an object such Example (the refrigerator, garbage can), DS A reported that staff should wash or replace gloves after each task pertaining to food. DS A reported that not practicing appropriate hand hygiene could result…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) observed for infection prevention.The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and used when CNA-A provided care for Resident #12.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection.Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 04/23/2024 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old man, with an initial admission date of 04/23/2024 with diagnoses which included: Heart Failure, unspecified, (heart failure but medical records lack detail about the specific type), Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (blockages or backward flow in the urinary system, where urine can't exit properly, backing up into the Kidneys and potentially causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #10) of 3 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to include Resident #10's tramadol pain medication in her care plan dated 11/20/25.This failure could lead to residents not receiving needed care and/or receiving improper care/treatment.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #10's admission revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, heart failure, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. A record review of Resident #10's MDS, completed on 12/22/25, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 resident out of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living care. The facility failed to provide nail care to Resident #1 as her nails were long, jagged, and sharp. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of a decline in their hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, a decreased level of satisfaction with life, and a decreased feeling of self-worth. Findings included: Review of the face sheet for Resident #1, dated 12/06/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of lower extremity (a condition that occurs when the valves in the leg veins are damaged, causing blood pressure to remain high in the veins) muscle wasting, and dyspnea (the uncomfortable feeling of not being able to breath well…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services in that: The facility failed to correctly label and date food, dispose of expired items within the expiration dates, and effectively store frozen items in sealed containers. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 10/29/2024 at 09:00 AM the following was observed: - Reach in freezer 1 contained two bags of frozen breaded chicken patties in a clear zip seal bag, and 1 bag of frozen pineapple slices all with an expiration date of 09/30/24. - Reach in freezer 2 contained a clear bag of frozen French fries, the bag was punctured and was observed to have a hole the size of a golf ball which exposed the contents to open air. - 1 clear container of corn flakes was observed with a label that had an open date and use by date of 10/08/24. In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,228 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $16,660 — penalty dated 2025-11-23
• $7,568 — penalty dated 2025-06-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $434K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX