Diversicare Of Meridian

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 97.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions regarding a sling type and size used during a mechanical lift transfer which resulted in Resident #1 falling from the lift and sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding around the brain) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Findings include:A record review of the Care Plan Report revealed Resident #1 had a Focus of I have a physical functioning deficit with transfers and require assistance of transferring with a Interventions including Hoyer Total lift Small (RED) Sling, initiated on 1/7/25.A review of the facility's Investigation Template, dated 4/22/26, revealed, .Incident Date: 4/18/26.Time: 7:00 PM.Description of the Allegation: Resident experienced a witnessed fall during transfer. Laceration to back of head. Resident was transferred to the hospital and returned within 24 hours at the same baseline as prior to the fall.Investigation Summary.She was identified as needing a full lift with sling to accommodate her body weight of 103 and body type.The center staff conducted a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and facility lift guidelines review, the facility failed to ensure the correct sling type and size were used during a mechanical lift transfer which resulted in Resident #1 falling from the lift and sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding around the brain) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents. Findings include:A review of the facility's Lift 4 Care - Safe 4 All Guidelines, dated 5/2024, revealed, Purpose: To provide team members guidance with assisting patients and residents to safely reposition or transfer. Guideline.7. In order to maintain patients' and residents' safety, patients and residents should be lifted or transferred by the lift and sling which is deemed appropriate after the lift evaluation is completed. There should be no interchanging of lifts and slings.A review of the facility's Investigation Template, dated 4/22/26, revealed, .Incident Date: 4/18/26.Time: 7:00 PM.Description of the Allegation: Resident experienced a witnessed fall during transfer. Laceration to back of head. Resident was transferred to the hospital and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-03-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure effective and timely pain management for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #5) with multiple cancer diagnoses, including lung, pancreatic, rectal, and glottic cancer and was admitted with physician orders for scheduled and as-needed (PRN) opioid analgesics but did not receive PRN pain medication for approximately twelve (12) hours following his admission, which resulted in unmanaged pain. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Pain Management, dated January 2021, revealed, .To provide guidelines for consistent evaluation, management and documentation of pain in order to provide maximum comfort and enhanced quality of life .Upon admission pain is evaluated .Findings are recorded in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) .Physician notification occurs as indicated for communication of findings and review of need for pharmacological options . A record review of the admission Record, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled. Resident #1.Findings include:A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation, Exploitation Policy, dated [DATE] revealed, .Purpose: To prohibit and prevent.misappropriation of resident property.Definitions.Misappropriation of Resident Property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings.without the residents consent.A record review of the facility's Investigation Template, dated [DATE], revealed that on [DATE], at approximately 7:57 AM, as the hospice nurse was providing postmortem care to Resident #1, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) # 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 entered the room and proceeded to take his personal belongings from his room. These items included drinks, toilet tissue, bed pads, a cup, and a blanket. A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food and maintain food quality in accordance with professional standards for food safety related to overly ripe produce and improperly stored foods and unlabeled items during one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Food Storage: Cold Foods revised 2/2023, revealed, .Procedures .2. All perishable foods will be maintained at a temperature of 41 degrees F or below . On 05/18/25 at 10:35 AM, during an observation and interview of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), refrigerator #3 revealed a plastic storage container containing 14 overly ripe cucumbers with white slimy rind, soft and pliable to the touch, and liquid formed at the bottom of the container. A further observation of the pantry revealed one (1) opened bottle of yellow mustard with the manufacturer's instructions Best if used by date of April 17, 2025; one (1) opened gallon-sized bottle of soy sauce with the manufacturer's instructions to Refrigerate after opening for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-21 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) reporting data review, the provider failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) (information of the staffing hours for the appropriate care of the residents) had been corrected before submitting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed. Findings include: Review of the provider's CASPER reporting data revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for one (1) of four (4) quarters: October 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024. Review of the facility's Monthly Schedule dated October, November, and December 2024 revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) worked as supervisor on October 26 and 27, November 3, and December 14 and 29, 2024. She worked on the floor as a nurse on November 5 and December 29, 2024. Review of the facility's Monthly Schedule dated October, November, and December 2025 revealed the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) worked as supervisor on October 6 and 19, November 3, 14, 16, and 17, and December 1 and 29,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review of resident council minutes, facility policy review, and interviews conducted during the Resident Council meeting, the facility failed to promptly resolve grievances related to condiments and call light response times for 12 of 12 Resident Council members. This failure has the potential to affect 87 residents. Cross Reference F725 Findings Include: A review of the facility's Resident Rights and Protections Under State and Federal Law dated 2022 indicates, You have the right to voice grievances and recommend changes . to representatives . and The nursing home must try to resolve the issue promptly. A review of the facility's Customer Concern (Grievance) Policy, effective date July 2018, indicates, Support residents' right to voice concerns . and ensure after receiving a concern, the center actively seeks a resolution ., and Customer concerns will have a prompt response . A record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated October 16, 2024, and November 20, 2024, confirmed residents raised concerns about the lack of condiments. On 05/18/25 at 12:30 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to discharge status (Resident #90) and an anticoagulant medication (Resident #14) for two (2) of 23 residents sampled. The scope/severity for F641 was increased to E because this tag was cited on the last annual recertification survey 1/25/24. This represents a pattern of deficiency. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, MDS and Care Plans, dated August 2019, revealed, .MDS will be developed and maintained per RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Guidelines. A record review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 Manual, dated October 2019, revealed, .Completion of the RAI . The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements . (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status . Resident #90: A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #90 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the care needs of residents during a shift change on three (3) of six (6) resident halls, as evidenced by the facility having one (1) Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) available during the transition from day shift to evening shift, while three nurses remained at the nurse's station, and five (5) resident call lights were observed activated for approximately 30 minutes without response. Cross Reference F565 Findings include: A review of the facility's Staffing Policy revealed it is the practice of (Proper Name of Facility) to assure that adequate staffing is maintained to provide the necessary care and services for each resident. Staff expectations are based on resident acuity and needs and may fluctuate based on the center population as identified in the facility assessment. The center conducts workforce management meetings daily to discuss open positions and call-ins as related to patient needs. The facility continues to actively recruit staff,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment in the resident rooms for three (3) of 32 rooms on the North Unit. Findings include: A review of the facility's Resident Rights & Quality of Life Policy, Policy#CC-20, effective March 13,2020 indicated: The patient or resident has the right to . receive services in a center environment that is safe, clean, and comfortable . On 05/19/25 at 10:43 AM, the State Agent (SA) observed exposed sheetrock surrounding the air conditioner in room N2. On 05/21/25 at 10:05 AM, during a room tour and interview with the Maintenance Supervisor, rooms N2, N4, and N8 were observed to have exposed wall areas near the door and air conditioner, chipped paint, and exposed metal on the bottom corner of walls. The Maintenance Supervisor stated that the damage in room N8 occurred while moving a bed and confirmed that all identified areas were in need of repair. Also, on 05/21/25, during an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor, the SA reviewed maintenance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for a resident no longer requiring the use of a lift for transfers for one (1) of 23 resident care plans reviewed (Resident #14). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, MDS and Care Plans, dated August 2019, revealed, .MDS will be developed and maintained per RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Guidelines. A review of the RAI 3.0 Operations Manual dated October 2019 revealed, .Planning for Care: Individualized care plans should address strengths and weakness .Individualized care plans should be based on an accurate assessment of the resident's self-performance and the amount and type of support being provided to the resident . A record review of Resident #14's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed a care plan with a revision date of 05/15/25 stated, .I have a physical functioning deficit with transfers and require assistance of 1 to two (2) staff as needed . with interventions listed as Hoyer Total Lift Large (Green) Sling and Invacare Total Lift Large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were respected as evidenced by staff members using their cell phones in the resident's rooms for two (2) of 34 sampled residents. Residents #30, 32, 35 and 61. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident's Rights and Quality of Life, with an effective date of 5/1/2012, revealed Policy Statement .It is the policy .that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility . Review of the facility's policy, Personal Cell Phone and Portable Electronic Device Usage Policy, with an effective date of 7/1/2014, revealed Purpose .we require that our employee follow the guidelines listed below for the safety of the residents, patients, our associates, and others . Policy .Usage in Work Areas During Work Time .Personal cell phones and/or portable electronic devices may not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for ordered medication for one (1) of 21 MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #63 Findings Include: Record review of facility policy titled, RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Process Guideline , dated September 2020, revealed, Guideline Statement: The purpose of this guideline is to provide guidance and instruction on how to complete the RAI process. The RAI process consists of three components: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Version 3.0, The Care Area Assessment (CAA) process, and the RAI utilization guideline .Process .The center will determine how the process is completed ensuring that the process includes direct observation and communication with the residents and direct care staff . Record review of Resident #63's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,798 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,520 — penalty dated 2026-05-05
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-03-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $598K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS