No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Diversicare Of Haysville

215 N Lamar Avenue, Haysville, KS 67060 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (316) 524-3211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$38,327 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,327 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7107 S Meridian St · (316) 858-8580 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
145 N Main St · (316) 524-4234 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
201 N Main St · (316) 529-8600 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 S Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.7%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.4%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%73.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%22.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.141.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.662.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.2%CMS range 40.5–60.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.5–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.4–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.78
RN hours/ resident / day
0.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
55.2%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.88 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-12)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately identify risks and provide interventions and adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for Resident (R) 1. On 05/16/2026, staff assessed R1's elopement risk during a Health Status Evaluation and inaccurately assessed R1 with the inability to leave the facility unattended therefore no risk was identified. On 05/28/2026 at around 01:50 PM, residents alerted Licensed Nurse (LN) G that R1 was outside on the East side of the building. LN G brought R1 back inside and assisted R1 into dry clothes. The facility was on [NAME] roads with posted speeds up to 35 miles per hour. The area also included other hazards such as a leaning fence with loose boards and nails on the ground. There was densely wooded tree line to the south and west of the facility. The weather at the time was approximately 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F.) with winds up to 15 miles per hour; it was raining at the time. The facility's failure to accurately identify risks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 88 residents with 13 selected for review including two residents reviewed for sexual abuse, Resident (R)4 and R5. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse on 09/26/23 at approximately 07:00 PM when Dietary Staff (DS) BB failed to immediately separate R4 away from R5, after DS BB saw R4 lift R5's dress. After witnessing the incident, DS BB went into the kitchen and told DS CC, which left R4 and R5 unsupervised, as no other staff were in the dining room at that time. DS CC stated when she walked out of the kitchen, she saw R4 had R5's dress pulled up with one hand and R4's other hand was on R5's thigh, and R5 seemed flustered and irritated. DS CC went to get the nurse on R5's hall, which again left R4 and R5 unsupervised. DS CC told CNA M that R4 had R5's dress pulled up exposing her, and his hand was on her thigh. CNA M stated when she entered the dining room, R4 was facing R5 with his arm up her dress and CNA M could not see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-05-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents, with 18 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nutritional interventions for Resident (R)3, to maintain her body weight, and prevent a significant weight loss of 6.85% (percent) in less than one month. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (chronic inflammation of the bowel). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required supervision with setup help for eating. Her height was 63 inches and she weighed 166 pounds (lbs.), with no or unknown weight loss or weight gain. The Nutritional Status Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/18/23, documented to refer to the dietary notes. The Care Plan, dated 04/12/23, lacked staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9 remained free from misappropriation when facility staff diverted 187 hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and/or Percocet (potent semi-synthetic opioid analgesics and antitussive used to treat severe pain) between 02/01/2025 to 10/30/2025. Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following: 1. The EMR for R1 documented diagnoses of central cord syndrome (an incomplete spinal cord injury characterized by disproportionately more weakness in the arms and hands than in the legs), sprain of ligaments of cervical spine, spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), fusion of spine, and chronic pain. R1's EMR had a Physician Order dated 08/21/2025 for Hydrocodone, 5 milligrams (MG) 1.5 tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for severe pain, with a stop date of 09/08/2025. R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August and September 2025 documented that pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate reconciliation of controlled medications (substances that have an accepted medical use, and have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) was completed. Findings included:- A facility reported incident, dated 10/27/2025, documented that one narcotic sheet was missing from the hall five medication cart. The facility then performed a medication audit that covered 02/01/2025 through 10/30/2025. The facility discovered that from 08/22/2025 to 10/27/2025 a total of 187 opioid tablets was missing from the hall five medication cart. The facility immediately implemented corrective actions that included the empty card and control sheet would remain on the cart until medical records or a designee removed them, and all licensed nurses (LN) and certified medication aides (CMA) were re-educated on documentation of recording correctly on the medication log. On 06/16/2026 at 11:30 AM, a review of the June 2026 Controlled Substance Shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 84 residents which included four residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that included Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and failed to implement adequate infection control and hand hygiene measures during wound care for one resident in the facility, Resident (R) 1. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for wound infection and related complications. Findings Included: - During an observation on 05/20/25 at 11:20 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered R1's room to perform wound care. LN G performed hand hygiene and donned clean gloves but did not don a gown. LN G removed the old dressing from R1's leg wound. LN G then doffed the gloves, performed hand hygiene, and applied new gloves. LN G then cleansed R1's coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spine) wound with wound cleanser. LN G removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate skills and knowledge to safely handle, store, and administer resident medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for potential medication errors and side effects. Findings included: - A Complaint Investigation Witness Statement completed 01/28/25 revealed the facility was unable to locate Resident (R) 35's prescribed five-milligram oxycodone (controlled substance pain medication with a high potential for abuse and dependency) pill card. The report indicated the pill card contained 30 individually packed and numbered for use. The report indicated the facility received the medication pill card on 01/09/25 and was placed in the narcotic lock box. The report indicated the narcotic count was updated to include the new card. The report indicated the missing count sheet and pill card were identified as missing on 01/28/25. The report indicated the facility was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report), when the facility failed to submit accurate weekend staffing coverage hours. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing. Findings included: - A review of the facility's submitted PBJ data from 10/01/24 through 12/31/24 indicated the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter One 2025. On 03/12/25 at 10:00 AM, the facility's Resident Council reported staffing on the weekends consistently changed due to call-offs. The council indicated the weekend manager would come in to fill shifts and help fill in the gaps. A review of the facility's working schedule, time sheets/punches, and posted staffing hours indicated no gaps or loss of hours. An inspection of the working schedule revealed weekend call-offs documented with administrative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with five residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 9, R14, R27, and R130. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and quality of life. Findings Included: - On 03/10/24 at 09:10 AM, R9 (a severely cognitively impaired resident) was assisted by an unidentified staff member in her room. R9 sat on the side of her bed in her room. R9's bedside table was positioned in front of her with her breakfast. R9 had only underwear on her lower half. R9 fell asleep as she sat on the side of her bed with her head against the wall. Her leg and groin area were left exposed. On 03/10/25 at 10:17 AM, R14 (a severely cognitively impaired resident) sat in his bed with his door fully open. R14 only had a sheet covering his groin area as staff and other residents passed his room. On 03/11/25 at 09:08 AM, R27 (a severely cognitively impaired resident) sat in her Broda chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of medications, pressurized oxygen cylinders, and chemical agents from eleven cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to ensure Resident (R) 130's bed remained at a safe height per her care-planned interventions. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - On 03/10/25 at 07:04 AM, an initial walkthrough of the facility was completed: An inspection of the supplemental oxygen storage closet revealed that the entry door was unlocked. The closet contained 79 fully compressed oxygen cylinder tanks stored in floor racks. At 07:10 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H inspected the door and found it was unlocked because the manual latch was not turned on the handle. LN H stated that the closet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, five medication carts and three medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications in three of the five medication carts. The facility also failed to label medication in one of the five medication carts. This placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes or ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - During initial tour on 03/10/25 at 07:10 AM a medication cart on the 300 hallway was unlocked and unattended in the hallway. The unattended medication cart contained five opened, undated insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pens. On 03/10/25 at 07:59 AM on hall 300 a medication cart with scheduled medication, scheduled narcotics, nasal sprays, was left unlocked with the medication keys and narcotic keys left in the cart. On 03/10/25 at 09:20 AM a medication cart in the resident's quiet room was unlocked and unattended. The medication cart contained eye drops, skin creams, enemas and pain relieve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The facility identified seven residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and one person on contact precautions (safeguards designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms by direct or indirect contact). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure to Resident (R) 130's Foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) tubing was off the floor. The facility additionally failed to store R38 respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. The facility further failed to sanitize a shared Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) between residents and failed to ensure the clean linen was covered in a sanitary manner when going through residents' halls. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included Findings: - On 03/10/25 at 07:04 AM a walkthrough of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate self-administration of medication for Resident (R) 22. This deficient practice placed R22 at risk for unnecessary medication side effects and self-administration errors. Findings included: - R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of blindness in one eye, paraparesis (partial paralysis, usually affecting only the lower extremities), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R22 was dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with four reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 and R66 had the appropriate call light or other method to communicate their needs. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle weakness, need for assistance with care, intellectual disabilities (a significantly below-average score on a test of mental ability or intelligence and limitations in the ability to function in areas of daily life), and obesity (severely overweight). R3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/29/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample includes 21 residents, with five residents reviewed for resident funds. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide and or ensure resident funds accounts were accessible 24 hours a day seven days a week. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - On [DATE] at 10:13 AM, Resident Council members Resident (R) 19, R53, and R65 reported the only way residents could access their money in their trust accounts was through Administrative Staff B. They reported that they were only aware that money withdrawals occurred Monday through Friday from 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM during the day. She stated we set a time because residents would be in my office all day long. On [DATE] at 11:431AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated residents can get money on the weekends, she stated there was money in an envelope on the 300-hall cart. CMA R stated residents could ask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 35 was free from abuse when R35's medication was misappropriated from the facility medication cart. This placed the residents at risk for both physical and psychosocial negative outcomes. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Diagnosis tab recorded diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) of the left nondominant side, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten which indicated moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit a full investigation of a reportable occurrence for Resident (R) 35 to the appropriate state agency within twenty-four hours as required for misappropriation of R35's missing controlled substance. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse and /or neglect. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Diagnosis tab recorded diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) of the left nondominant side, Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with three sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 14 and R54 and their representative received written notification of transfer, as soon as practicable to R14 and R54 or their representative for their facility-initiated transfer. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R14 and R54. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure (a condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes mellitus (DM - when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with three sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to Resident (R) 14 and R54 or their representatives when they transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice had the risk of impaired ability for R14 and R54 to return to the facility and their previous rooms. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure (a condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), bipolar disorder (a major mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent weekend activities on Sundays to promote socialization. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendar for January, February, and March 2025 was completed. The Activity Calendar for January 2025 recorded each Sunday listed church services at 02:00 PM. The Activity Calendar for February 2025 recorded each Sunday listed church services at 2:00 PM, Sunday 02/02/25 at 06:30 PM listed resident movie night, 02/09/25 at 06:30 PM listed game night, 02/16/25 at 06:30 listed resident chooses game night, and 02/23/25 at 06:30 listed resident movie night. The Activities Calendar for March 2025 recorded each Sunday listed church services at 02:00 PM, Sunday 03/02/25 at 06:30 PM listed residents choose a game to play, on 03/09/25 at 06:30 PM card games, on 03/16/25 at 0:6:30 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents with one resident reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for daily weights to monitor for congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) for Resident (R) 2. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), CHF, and edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with one reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide dementia-related care services for Resident (R) 12 to promote the resident's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R12 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R12's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive-communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and need for assistance with personal cares. R12's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/14/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and addressed the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations for Resident (R) 61's as needed psychotropic medication (alters mood or thought). The facility also failed to ensure the CP identified and reported irregularities regarding lack of dosing instructions for Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel and the lack of monitoring antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications for R54. The facility also failed to ensure the CP identified and reported irregularities regarding lack of documentation of R14's oxygen saturation monitoring. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for adverse medication effects and unnecessary medications. Findings included: - R61's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 14's oxygen (O2) saturation was monitored and documented as physician ordered. The facility failed to ensure staff monitored and documented R54's pulse for her antiarrhythmic (medications used to treat abnormal heart rhythms) and R54's blood pressure for her beta blocker (a medication used to treat high blood pressure and other cardiac conditions). This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medication administration and related complications. Findings included: - R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), heart failure (a condition where the heart is unable to pump enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the as needed (PRN) psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication had a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with supporting physician documentation for Resident (R) 61's PRN psychotropic medications. This placed R61 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings included: - R61's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 81 residents. The sample included 21 residents, with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to offer or obtain informed declinations, consent, or a physician-documented contraindication for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial infections) pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 32. The facility also failed to administer PCV20 for R54 who had given consent. This placed these residents at increased risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from the pneumococcal disease. Findings included: - Review of R32's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration or physician-documented contraindication. Review of R54's clinical record revealed the PCV13 was administered on 11/15/20. The facility provided a signed consent for PCV20 dated 10/02/24. R54's clinical record lacked documentation PCV20 was administered. On 03/12/25 at 12:42 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 88 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in the resident rooms, shower rooms, and hallways, for all of the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 10/10/23 at 10:09 AM an environmental tour revealed the following concerns on the 400 Hallway: 1. The fire door has multiple areas of scraped paint, with the largest area approximately one foot in width. 2. A resident room with scraped paint along the doorways, a dark substance around the base of the toilet, scraped paint on several walls, brown splatters on a wall, a brown substance on the handrail above the wall with the same splatter opposite of the toilet, peeling paint above the sink caulking, a bent floor vent with rust spots, floor tile with approximately a three inch area missing, and a paint scrape below and left of the windowsill. 3. A resident bathroom with a large area of rust colored stain around the sink drain, paint scrapes on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 88 residents. The 13 residents sampled included eight residents reviewed for resident funds. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to safeguard cash in the facility safe located in the business office, for two of the eight residents reviewed resulting in theft of cash for R6 in the amount of $2,300 and for R7 in the amount of $4,000. The facility replaced the missing cash for these two residents but this practice left any other resident who placed cash or valuables in the facility safe at potential for loss. Findings included: - The facility investigation dated 10/09/23 revealed on 10/03/23 at approximately 02:00 PM, Administrative Staff B noted cash funds missing from the facility safe in the total amount of $6,300. Administrative Staff B then notified Consultant Staff HH, who arrived at the facility, completed a search of the safe, and confirmed the funds were missing. R6 and R7 had previously placed funds in the total amount of $6,300 in the safe. The staff notified the local law enforcement who arrived, took…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 88 residents with 13 selected for review, including five residents reviewed for personal funds accounts, Resident (R)9, R10, R11, R12, and R13. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notification to the five selected residents, who received Medicaid benefits, when the amount in their trust account reached $200.00 less than the SSI (Supplemental Security Income) resource limit (Limit is $2,000) to prevent loss of eligibility for Medicaid or SSI. Findings included: - The Midnight Census Report dated 10/08/23 revealed the Primary Payor source for R9 was Hospice Medicaid, and Primary Payor source was only Medicaid for R10, R11, R12, and R13. The Resident Statement Landscape for R9 revealed from 01/03/23 through 09/11/23 his account balance ranged from $7,891.90 to $11,231.60. The Resident Statement Landscape for R10 revealed from 07/28/23 through 09/06/23 her balance ranged from $3,781.57 to $5,605.85. The Resident Statement Landscape for R11 revealed from 01/03/23 through 09/06/23 his balance ranged from $6,207.80 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an environmental tour of the kitchen on 05/17/23 at 07:03 AM, with dietary staff N and O, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. There was a loose hose on the top of the ice machine. No staff member was aware of what the hose led to. 2. The juice machine had a build-up of sticky, dried juice on the nozzle. 3. The large, industrial can opener had a build-up of dried food on the tip. 4. The drain to the ice machine lacked a two-inch air gap to prevent backflow into the ice. 5. Thirteen cookie sheets contained a sticky, dried on substance over the cooking area of the pan. 6. The metal dish rack used to hold individual serving bowls, had rust in multiple areas of the rack. 7. The metal rack used to hold pots and pans had a sticky substance on multiple areas of the rack. 8. Four skillets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 87 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services for the kitchen floor to provide a safe, functional and sanitary environment. Findings included: - During an environmental tour of the kitchen on 05/17/23 at 07:03 AM, revealed the following concern: The kitchen floor had multiple cracked, broken tiles throughout the kitchen. On 05/17/23 at 07:03 AM, Dietary staff O confirmed the kitchen floor had multiple broken tiles. The facility lacked a policy for the upkeep of the kitchen floor. The facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services for the kitchen floor to provide a safe, functional and sanitary environment.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 87 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise care plans for four sampled residents including, interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R)73, behaviors for the use of an antipsychotic medication for R29, with instructions for the dialysis communication sheet for R72, and for Activities of Daily Living needs of R3. Findings included: - R73's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: chronic kidney disease, (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes), hip fracture (broken bone), Pelvic fracture, acute respiratory failure, (inability to breathe), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 87 residents with 26 residents residing one hall, and one bath house used to bathe those 26 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call light accessibility to these 26 residents when they received showers in this one shower room. The shower area lacked a cord on the two call lights located in the shower and the call light next to the toilet making them inaccessible to residents receiving showers and staff providing showers, in case of emergency. Findings included: - Tour of the facility on 05/15/23, revealed a shower room on one of the resident halls. Observation of the room for functional call lights, revealed the two call lights in the shower area lacked pull cords attached for residents or staff to use in case of an emergency. Additionally, the call light in the same room but next to the toilet also lacked a pull cord attached for residents or staff to use in case of an emergency. On 05/15/23 at 11:05 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) S stated that the call lights in the shower room should have pull…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat two residents with respect and dignity including Resident (R)3, by leaving the resident exposed to others in the hallway while she rested in bed and (R) 29, wearing soiled clothing. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's electronic medical record (EMR) included a diagnosis of weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and extensive assistance of one staff for dressing. The Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/18/23, documented the resident was alert with confusion and required extensive assistance of one to two staff for most daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 included in the sample including one reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Resident (R) 73 or his representative with hospital transfer. Findings included: - Review of R73 Minimum Data Set tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R73's Electronic Medical Record revealed it lacked evidence of written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalization transfer and bed hold to the resident or to her representative. On 05/16/23 at 07:20 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P performed AM care to the resident as she sat in her wheelchair. The sit to stand lift sat in the room and staff reported she just transferred the resident to her chair with just one staff herself. The resident was alert with no signs of distress or discomfort. On 05/17/23 at 8:40 AM, Administrative Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a individualized comprehensive care plan for one Resident (R)3, regarding the use of oxygen. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of respiratory failure (the inability of the lungs to perform their basic task of gas exchange, the transfer of oxygen from inhaled air into the blood and the transfer of carbon dioxide from the blood into exhaled air). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident used oxygen while a resident. The Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/18/23, documented the resident had a diagnosis of sleep apnea (sleep disorder characterized by periods without respirations). Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 86 residents with 18 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure planned and implemented interventions following a fall by one sampled resident (R) 73, to prevent further falls and potential injury. Findings included: - R73's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: chronic kidney disease, (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes), hip fracture (broken bone), Pelvic fracture, acute respiratory failure, (inability to breathe), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, was non-ambulatory, and required extensive assistance of one for dressing and toileting. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately administer oxygen to Resident (R)138 as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to properly store the nebulizer (a device for administering inhaled medications) and to correctly store distilled water used for oxygen humidification for R78. These deficient practices could lead to possible respiratory complications and/or infections. Findings included: - R78's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), acute sudden and chronic (persisting for a long period) respiratory failure (a condition in which respiratory function is inadequate to maintain the body's need for oxygen supply and/or carbon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dialysis. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate adequate communication between the dialysis center and the facility, for the one Resident (R)72, regarding a lack of regular dialysis communication sheets, with the facility. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)72's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She was independent with activities of daily living (ADL) and received dialysis (when a machine removes blood from your body, filters it through a dialyzer (artificial kidney) and returns the cleaned blood to your body). The Care Area Assessment, dated 09/27/22, lacked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 87 residents with 18 residents in the sample which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of the five sampled residents, including Resident (R) 8 and R18 were appropriately and timely monitored for side effects of extrapyramidal (abnormal involuntary body movements caused by medications) symptoms due to antipsychotic (a class of medication used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication use. Findings included: - R8's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition characterized primarily by symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations or delusions, and symptoms of a mood disorder, such as mania and depression), major depressive disorder (MDD - a serious mood disorder involving one or more episodes of intense psychological depression or loss of interest or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 87 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to honor Resident (R) 14's dietary food choices when the resident requested no pork be served and the facility continued to serve her pork. Findings included: - R14's signed physician orders dated 03/10/23, revealed hypertension (elevated blood pressure), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland) diabetes mellitus type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and the resident had no reported behavior issues. Review of the Care Plan dated 03/13/23, revealed it instructed the staff to serve the resident's diet as ordered. The Registered Dietician was to evaluate and make diet change recommendation as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - Resident (R) 78's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) acute (sudden) and chronic (persisting for a long period) and respiratory failure (a condition in which respiratory function is inadequate to maintain the body's need for oxygen supply and/or carbon dioxide removal while at rest). The 03/08/23 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident required limited or extensive assistance of one staff for most cares and received the use of oxygen (O2). The 04/29/23 quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition and the resident continued to receive oxygen. The 03/08/23 Care Area Assessment (CAA) lacked documentation related to the oxygen usage. R78's EHR Physician Orders included ipratropium-albuterol inhalation solution to be given three times per day for shortness of air but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 78 residents with 18 in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene when going from dirty to clean areas, during two observation of incontinence care for Resident (R) 44. Findings included: - Observation on 10/11/21 at 09:52 AM revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and CNA N prepared to change the R44's brief. CNA O and CNA N washed their hands and donned (put on) gloves. CNA N removed the residents wet brief, placed a clean brief under the resident, and then used wet wipes to provide peri-care to the resident. CNA N used the wet wipes to clean the front of the resident but did not clean between R44's legs or buttocks. CNA N fastened the adhesive tabs on R44's clean brief. CNA N wore the same gloves throughout the observation of R44's brief change and peri-care. Observation on 10/12/21 at 11:15 AM CNA P and CNA M donned gloves then moved the R44's bed. CNA M peeled the adhesive tabs back from R44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,327 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $24,930 — penalty dated 2025-04-15
  • $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-02 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Diversicare Of BessemerBessemer, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of MeridianMeridian, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of Oak RidgeOak Ridge, TN 1 of 5Diversicare Of OxfordOxford, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of RipleyRipley, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SedgwickSedgwick, KS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SouthavenSouthaven, MS 1 of 5Lampasas Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5Windsor HouseHuntsville, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of AmoryAmory, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ArabArab, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BatesvilleBatesville, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of BoazBoaz, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BrookhavenBrookhaven, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ChanuteChanute, KS 2 of 5Diversicare Of Council GroveCouncil Grove, KS 2 of 5Diversicare Of EuporaEupora, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of FoleyFoley, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of MontgomeryMontgomery, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of Moss PointMoss Point, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of Pell CityPell City, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of TupeloTupelo, MS 2 of 5St Martin's In The PinesIrondale, AL 3 of 5Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of Copper BasinCopperhill, TN 3 of 5Diversicare Of LulingLuling, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of OneontaOneonta, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of QuitmanQuitman, MS 3 of 5Diversicare Of RiverchaseBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of ShelbyShelby, MS 3 of 5Park PlaceSelma, AL 3 of 5Yorktown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, TX 4 of 5Baron House Of HueytownHueytown, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of Big SpringsHuntsville, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of HutchinsonHutchinson, KS 4 of 5Diversicare Of LanettLanett, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of WinfieldWinfield, AL 4 of 5Hartford Health CareHartford, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of GreensboroGreensboro, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of LarnedLarned, KS

Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIVERSICARE KANSAS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/29/2013
ADVOCAT FINANCE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
DAC NEWCORP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/04/2022
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/04/2022
DIVERSICARE HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LP.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
MCCUE, TAMARAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2021
MEDINA, ISAIAHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2024
KELLMAN, FRANKLINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/13/2024
KOHN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/19/2021
RATNER, ERANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024
BODIE, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2020
NEE, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/20/2023
WEISHAAR, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 6%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$254per resident / day
operating cost
$7,735per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$267per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next