Diversicare Of Hutchinson

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 68.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 64 residents, which included one resident reviewed for accidents and identified 12 residents that were confused and independently mobile. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired Resident (R)1 remained free from accident hazards when on 07/15/24 at approximately 10:15 AM, R1 left the facility through an unsecured gate in the west courtyard. R1 remained unsupervised until Law Enforcement Officers (LEO) contacted R1 outside of a local business, located approximately 2.8 miles away from the facility, at 11:10 AM (55 minutes after R1 left the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge). R1 did not return to the facility until approximately 11:25 AM (one hour and 10 minutes after R1 left the facility). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to serious bodily harm to R1 and placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R1 included the following diagnoses:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 37 residents. The sample included seven residents, with one resident reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), care, and services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to initiate a dementia plan of care that identified and honored Resident (R) 1's desire for physical engagement, which included direction to staff on how to identify voluntary engagement, and how to monitor for potential negative outcomes associated with physical engagement. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) under the Census tab documented R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE].R1's EHR revealed diagnoses of dementia, major depressive disorder (a major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and unspecified sexual dysfunction.R1's 09/28/25 Modified admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 70 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, homelike environment for the residents who ate in the dining room and the residents who resided on two of the four resident halls. Findings included: - On 01/30/25 at 08:55 AM, observation during a tour of the facility revealed the following: The dining room floor had a broken tile with a missing piece, approximately five by six inches. The dining room exit to the east had missing door trim, and the foam insulation was visible. The dining room wall behind the ice machines had a hole, approximately one foot by two and a half feet, with the inside wall and pipes visible. The northwest resident hall had numerous damaged or ill-fitting ceiling tiles. The northeast resident hall had numerous damaged or stained ceiling tiles. The northeast hall shower room had a framed hole in the wall, approximately 15 by 15 inches, with the pipes and inner wall visible. On 01/30/25 from 08:55 to 09:05 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the findings and stated the facility had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement grip strips in front of Resident (R) 20's toilet and failed to implement anti-rollbacks on his wheelchair. This deficient practice placed R20 at risk for future preventable falls. Findings Include: - R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (high blood pressure), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), overactive bladder, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 71 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three residents reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R) 7 and R62 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R7 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder, lupus (an autoimmune disease that makes the immune system damage organs and tissue throughout the body), altered mental status, rheumatoid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with two reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess the actual rail being used to assure safety for Resident (R) 8 and R62. This deficient practice placed R8 at risk for preventable injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R2's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure, bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), cerebrovascular accident (CVA -stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). R8's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported an inappropriate indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication (a class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 5. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and related side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia with agitation (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The Facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 5 had an approved diagnosis or a physician-documented rationale which included risks versus benefits for R5's use of Rexaulti (an antipsychotic class of medication used to treat mental conditions which cause a break from reality), and R 36's Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication)s used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality). The facility further failed to ensure R20 had a 14-day stop date for the use of Ativan (an antianxiety medication). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia with agitation (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 70 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications in a timely manner. This deficient practice placed residents at risk to receive ineffective medication. Findings included: - On 01/28/25 at 01:35 PM, observation in the facility's only medication room revealed a bottle of 325 milligrams (MG) aspirin tablets with an expiration date of 08/2024 and a bottle of GeriMox (antacid medication), expired 11/2024. On 01/28/25 at 01:35 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J verified the expired drugs should have been disposed of. The facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy, dated April 2020, stated drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container would be labeled with the manufacturer's expiration date. All expired medication would be removed from the active supply and destroyed in the facility. No expired medications would be administered to a resident. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications in a timely manner. This deficient practice placed residents at risk to receive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 57 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared serving one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly store food in the main kitchen refrigerators and freezers due to boxes placed directly on the floor and foods left uncovered; failed to discard expired foods and failed to store opened food products in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, to prevent food borne illness to the residents. Findings included: - During the brief initial tour of the kitchen, on 03/22/23 at 07:46 AM, the following items were discovered: 1. The walk-in refrigerator had a sheet pan with shredded potatoes spread on it and a sheet pan with five cups of fruit on it open to air without a cover on either of them. 2. The walk-on freezer had approximately 10 various food boxes sitting directly on the floor with 30 boxes stacked on them. 3. The walk-in refrigerator had a box of lettuce open to air and wilted and not dated. 4. The bread rack contained one loaf of bread…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 57 residents residing on four halls in the facility. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by the failure to repair walls where they were scuffed into the dry wall and paint missing on three out of four halls and elevated noise levels on the two south halls that were unacceptable to residents voicing complaints about noise levels. Findings included: - Observation, on 03/22/23 10:21 AM, revealed large gouges in a wall by the head of the bed in a room on the 100 hall. Several areas where walls have been hit and paint was gone noted on the south halls. On 03/28/23 at 11:00 AM, a tour of the facility with Maintenance Staff U revealed several areas on the south two halls where paint and plaster were scuffed off on the walls. The wall in a resident room on a north hall revealed a large deep gouge approximately 10 inches in diameter on the wall by the head of the bed. The area had paint and plaster missing. Interview, on 03/22/23 at 11:30 AM, with Maintenance Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,376 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,376 — penalty dated 2024-09-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $860K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS