No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Diversicare Of Tupelo

2273 South Eason Boulevard, Tupelo, MS 38804 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (662) 842-2461 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (662) 842-2461 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jan 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation$20,284 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,284 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-11)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
149 N Eason Blvd · (662) 678-1050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1244 E Main St · (662) 844-7811 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1218 E Main St · (662) 844-8734 · Call to confirm hours
Park
800 S Veterans Memorial Blvd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1644 S Eason Blvd · (662) 372-1255

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%20.5%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.4%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.2%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%1.6%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%19.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%23.8%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%97.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%6.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.8%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.2%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.7%84.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.7%27.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%15.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.572.431.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.672.861.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.6%CMS range 54.5–74.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.3–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.9%CMS range 4.0–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
38.8%
Total nursing turnover
63.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-14)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the resident's Kardex requiring two-person assistance for bed mobility and toileting. This failure resulted in Resident #1 falling from the bed and sustaining actual harm in the form of a skin tear, facial swelling, bruising, and maxillary hematoma, with increased pain requiring a new order for tramadol, an opioid analgesic, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for accidents. ( Resident # 1)Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, “Resident Rights & Quality of Life Policy,” with an effective date of March 13,2020, revealed Procedure: A patient or resident has the right: … To receive services in a center environment that is safe. … Record review of the “Post Fall Review” for Resident #1 dated 7/25/25 revealed an investigation of the residents fall with an injury that indicated in an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Review: IDT met: “CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) was in the room changing resident. Resident rolled over to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for one (1) of 32 initial pool residents. Resident #14 Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Policy, unrevised, revealed under Policy Statement: It is the policy of the center to take appropriate steps to prevent the occurrence of abuse, neglect, injuries of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident/patient property .Record review revealed the facility reported an allegation of abuse to the State Agency on 1/10/26 at 11:30 AM after a staff member witnessed Resident #56 touching Resident #14 inappropriately. The residents were immediately separated and Resident #56 denied the allegation, and an investigation was initiated.An observation of Resident #56 on 1/11/26 at 3:45 PM revealed he was sitting in his wheelchair outside his room doorway with a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) sitting nearby. Resident #56 stated he had behaviors and that staff were watching him.An interview with Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident's transfer to the hospital, which did not ensure compliance with required notification procedures for resident transfers for one (1) of four (4) hospitalizations reviewed. Resident #46 Findings Include:Record review of facility policy titled, Transfer and discharge date d 11/1/16, revealed 4. Before (Proper name of facility removed) transfers or discharges the Resident, it shall notify the Resident and the Resident's Representative of the basis for the transfer or discharge in a language and manner they understand; and will also notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman . Record review of Resident #46's Order Details revealed an order dated 11/21/25 to send to (Proper name of hospital removed) ER (Emergency Room) for AMS (Altered Mental Status). Record review of the Emergency Transfer Log for the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for the month of November 2025, revealed Resident #46 was not listed for his 11/21/25 transfer.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for two (2) of 28 residents sampled. (Resident #39 and Resident #58) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plans with effective date: October 2021, revealed, Policy.Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revied as needed according to resident and patient status or change. Record review of Resident #39's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026, revealed Resident #39 was currently on an anticoagulant Eliquis five (5) milligram (mg) tablet by mouth (PO) two times a day as of 10/15/25. There was no monitoring for signs/symptoms of bleeding. Record review of Resident #39's Care Plan Risk for complications related to anticoagulant. with review date 10/23/2025, revealed, .Observe for sign and symptoms (S/S) of bleeding example (i.e.) tarry stools, blood in urine, bruising, petechiae. During an interview on 1/12/2026 at 3:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan, following a fall, on one (1) of 28 residents sampled. (Resident #83) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Care Plans with effective date: October 2021, revealed, Policy.Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change .During observation and interview on 1/11/2026 at 3:43 PM, Resident #83 was lying in bed. She was observed to have old, facial bruising. Resident #83 stated she had a fall in her room, but it was a long time ago. She stated, It's almost healed now. Observed that her bed was not in low position during observation. Record review of Post Fall Review with effective date 1/1/2026, revealed, .Date and time of fall: 12/31/2025 21:06 (9:06 PM) .Interventions/recommendations post fall .Recommendations/Interventions .Bed in low position .Care Plan/Kardex updated with new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance received activities of daily living (ADL) care, including grooming and personal hygiene services such as hair washing, in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, for one (1) of 29 residents. (Resident #58) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with an effective date of August 2021, revealed the facility policy is to ensure activities of daily living are provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice, the resident's care plan, and reasonable accommodation of the resident's choices and preferences. The policy further identified hygiene activities of daily living to include bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. During an interview on 1/11/2026 at 4:00 PM, Resident #58 stated she has received her baths but hasn't had her hair washed in approximately two weeks; she stated she would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring for one (1) of 28 residents reviewed following expressions of suicidal ideation, despite receiving post-emergency room recommendations for psychiatric follow-up. (Resident #8) Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services with no date revealed, Each.resident must receive.the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Interview with Resident #8 on 01/11/26 at 3:45 PM the resident stated that she had been to the emergency room (ER) recently and that she wanted to see a psychiatrist and had not seen one yet.Review of the ER records revealed Resident #8 presented to ER with mood instability and insomnia on 01/10/26. Documentation indicated the resident experienced crying spells and moodiness, with fleeting thoughts of self-harm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was performed correctly for one (1) of six (6) residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #70. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's Peri Care Audit Tool (undated) revealed, 11. If Foley catheter present, must wash catheter tube first before starting the peri care. Washes from the meatus up the tube about 6 inches X2 (times two) with changing position of cloth. An observation of Resident #70's catheter care with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 on 1/12/26 at 3:40 PM revealed she prepared to provide catheter care and filled one pan with clean water. CNA #4 wet a washcloth and applied Dynacare shampoo and body wash directly to the cloth. She washed the resident's groin area first, then washed the shaft of the penis, and lastly washed the urinary meatus followed by the catheter. She did not rinse the washcloth with soap between cleaning the different areas of the groin area. An interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 on 1/12/26 at 3:54 PM confirmed that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring for adverse effects of a medication for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for medication review. (Resident #39). Findings include:Review of document on facility letterhead, dated 1/14/26, with the Administrator's signature, revealed, Standards of Practice.The expectation set forth by (facility proper name removed) management is that nurses comply with current standards of practice for residents needing anticoagulant monitoring.Record review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was prescribed Eliquis five (5) milligram (mg) tablet by mouth (PO) two times a day on 10/15/2025; however, the record lacked evidence that nursing staff monitored for signs and symptoms (s/s) of bleeding.On 1/12/2026 at 3:41 PM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no order to monitor every (q) shift for bleeding. She stated her expectation was that any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were consistently implemented in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment by not dating the oxygen tubing and oxygen humidifier water bottles for Residents #37 and #93 and failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) by not wearing a gown during Foley catheter care for a resident requiring EBP (Resident #70). These failures affected three (3) of twenty nine sampled residents. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Guideline with an effective date of 1/1/2022 revealed, Medical oxygen is classified by the Food and Drug Administration as a drug and therefore it is provided in accordance with a health care provider's order and in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. Review of the Infection Control Guide dated 2025 revealed under, System of Isolation for Infection Control: Enhanced Barrier Precautions should be considered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative interviews, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services for obtaining medications timely for two (2) of four (4) residents sampled. Resident #1 and Resident #2 Findings include: Record review of facility's letterhead titled, Standards of Practice, undated, revealed, The expectation set forth by (facility's name) management is that nurses comply with current standards of practice in terms of following physician's orders. Record review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights and Quality of Life Policy, dated 3/13/20, revealed, It is the policy of (facility's name) that all patients and residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to people and services inside and outside the center. Resident #1 During a phone interview on 6/17/25 at 12:10 PM, Resident #1's Representative (RR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on the evening on 5/13/25 and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor residents' right to vote in the 2024 election for three (3) of six (6) residents sampled for resident's rights. Residents #4, #5, and #6 Findings Include: Record review of facility policy titled, Resident's Rights and Quality of Life, dated 5/1/12, revealed, It is the policy of (proper name removed) that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. A resident has the right to exercise his/her rights as a resident of the facility and a citizen or resident of the U.S. and be free of interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal by (proper name removed) or its employees for the exercise of such rights. During an interview on 1/16/25 at 11:10 AM, Resident #6 revealed she had told the staff several weeks before the 2024 presidential election that she wanted to vote with a mail-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that allowed it to use its resources effectively to ensure the well-being of its residents for four (4) of the four (4) days of the survey. Findings Include This tag is cross referenced to F 565, F 677, F 689, F 761, and F 880 A review of the typed statement on facility letterhead revealed that the facility did not have an Administration Policy and was signed by the Administrator. F 565 On 9/17/24 at 3:05 PM, during the resident council meeting held Resident #25 revealed that the food is terrible. She has complained about it in the resident council before, but nothing has improved. Resident #3 confirmed that they have complained about the food in resident council meetings every month and nothing is done. Resident #25 and Resident #50 stated that they never know when the resident council meeting is going to be each month because it is not put on the monthly activity calendar During an interview on 9/17/24 at 3:40 PM, with the Administrator confirmed that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey of 6/22/23. This was for deficiencies recited during a recertification survey on 9/16/24. The recited deficiencies included F 550, F565, F584, F656, F677, F689, F761, and F880. The continued failure of the facility during two state surveys indicates a pattern of the facility to sustain an effective QAA program. This was for eight (8) of 18 deficient practice citations. Findings Included: This citation is cross-referenced to: F 550, F 565, F 584, F 656, F 677, F 689, F 761, and F 880 Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement dated February 2017 revealed, Purpose: QAPI is a data driven, proactive approach to improving the quality of life, care and services in our centers. The activities of QAPI involve team members at all levels of the organization to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide dignity to residents, as evidenced by leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered for two (2) of four (4) residents with a catheter. Resident #52 and Resident #190. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, Resident's Rights and Quality of Life dated 05/01/2012, revealed . all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. Resident #52 An observation on 09/16/24 at 9:25 AM and again at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #52 lying in bed, with the bed against the right wall. Resident #52's urinary catheter bag and tubing were exposed with approximately 100 cc (cubic centimeters) of urine in the catheter bag with no privacy covering over the urinary drainage bag. An observation and interview on 09/16/24 at 3:15 PM with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) revealed all urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that all residents were made aware of the resident council meetings each month in order to make the choice to attend (Resident #27 and Resident #50) for two (2) of 16 residents reviewed. The facility also failed to resolve grievances for seven (7) of eight (8) resident council meetings. CROSS REFERENCE F804??????? Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Council with an effective date of 5/1/12 revealed under Procedure .#4. Activity Director/SS Designee will provide written answers to questions, requests and grievances to the Resident Council. #5. The Activity Director/SS Designee shall communicate to all residents when and where resident council meetings are held . Record review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes confirmed that food concerns were discussed in the minutes for 9/24, 8/24, 7/24, 6/24, 5/24, 3/24 and 2/24. Food and menu concerns were mentioned and no resolution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, statement on facility letterhead and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe environment, as evidenced by a dirty wheelchair, (Resident #71) and electrical wires exposed on a bed control (Resident #12) for two (2) of the 22 residents sampled residents. Findings Include: A review of the statement on facility on letterhead signed by the Administrator and dated September 18, 2024, revealed, (Proper Name) utilizes the Embrace Program for our wheelchair cleaning and inspection of bed controls and electrical connections. A review of the facility policy titled Resident's Right and Quality of Life, dated May 1, 2012, revealed, A resident has the right: to receive services in a facility environment that is safe, clean, and comfortable . Resident #12 On 09/16/24 at 10:10 AM, an observation revealed Resident #12's electric bed control in disrepair and laying beside her in bed on her right side. The cord was frayed, and it had an area that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan related to Activity of Daily Living (ADL) for Resident #58, Resident #59 and for Resident #22 for smoking . For three (3) of 22 care plans reviewed. Findings Include: Facility policy titled, Care Plans, with no date, revealed, Care plans will be developed for all patients and residents based upon the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual guidelines. Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change. Resident #22 Record review of Resident #22's Care Plans with a date initiated of 5/29/21 revealed , Focus: At risk for smoking related injury related to: Smokes independently .Interventions .Observe patient for unsafe smoking behaviors or attempts to obtain smoking material from outside sources. Immediately inform facility management. Patient is not to have cigarettes or smoking material on person During an observation of Resident #22 on 9/16/24 at 10:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for a resident requiring nail care (Resident #58, #59) and incontinent care (Resident #7) for three (3) of 22 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) dated August, 2021, revealed, Policy: Ensure ADL's are provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice, the care plan, and reasonable accommodation of the resident's choices and preferences. An observation on 9/17/24 at 8:15 AM, revealed Resident #7 was lying in bed with eyes open, alert but confused and it was noted a very strong odor of urine in the room. An observation and interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #7 on 9/17/24 at 8:18 AM, confirmed the strong odor of urine in the room and confirmed the resident was incontinent and explained that she had not made a round on the resident since her shift started at 7 AM. The CNA revealed the last round would have been done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a residents' environment was free from accident hazards, as evidenced by, medications left at bedside and smoking paraphernalia in rooms for two (2) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #22 and #34 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Safe Smoking with an effective date of 11/1/16 revealed under, Purpose: 1. To maximize our ability to provide a safe environment for all residents/patients who smoke, while taking into account non-smoking residents . Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, dated September 17, 2024, and signed by the Administrator revealed (Proper name of the facility) does not have a policy for Medication Left at Bedside. The center utilizes the Medication Administration Clinical Competency. An observation of Resident #22 on 9/16/24 at 10:00 AM, revealed he was lying in bed. with a cigarette box lying at the foot of the bed in a white and blue pack. Resident #22 revealed he was a smoker and stated, They don't let us keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored securely in a locked medication cart or locked storage room for two (2) of four (4) medication carts used in the facility. Findings Include Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, dated September 18, 2024 and signed by the Administrator revealed (Proper name of facility) does not have a policy for Storage of Medications on top of the medication cart. An observation on 9/16/24 at 9:04 AM, revealed an unattended medication cart sitting outside the dining room near the beginning of the B Hall. The top of the cart contained a medicine cup full of a red liquid, a bottle of magnesium, Colace and calcium sitting on the top of the medication cart. An observation and interview on 9/16/24 at 9:06 AM, with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) confirmed there was a medicine cup full of a red liquid, and three bottles of over-the-counter medication that included magnesium, Colace and a bottle of calcium. She stated that medication should never be left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to fully implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) precautions and failed to follow infection control measures while providing resident care for two (2) of four (4) survey days that had the potential to affect 11 residents on EBP and Resident #2 and Resident #20. Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Policies and Practices - Infection Control with an effective date of 11/1/17 revealed .Policy Statement: This center's infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections . Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, dated September 18, 2024 and signed by the Administrator, revealed (Proper name of facility) uses the CDC (Centers of Disease Control) guidelines for the implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions. An observation of the facility on 09/16/24 from 10:00 AM until 11:30 AM revealed there was one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, meal ticket review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for sweet tea with meals for one (1) of twenty-two sampled residents. Resident #44 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights and Quality of Life with a revision date of 5/1/12 revealed under, Policy Statement: It is the policy of (Proper Name) that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility. An interview with Resident #44 on 9/16/24 at 11:06 AM revealed, she wanted sweet tea with meals, and it had been over a month since she had gotten it. She stated she had told them, but they keep sending unsweet tea and she just cannot drink it. An observation and interview with Resident #44 on 9/16/24 at 12:42 PM revealed, she received a glass of tea with her lunch meal. The resident revealed the tea was unsweet. The meal ticket provided with the lunch tray dated 9/17/24 read, Sweetened Iced Tea- 8 oz…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were addressed or correct for three (3) of the 22 sampled residents. Resident #43, Resident #63, and Resident #84 Findings Included: Record review of facility policy titled, Advance Directives, dated [DATE], revealed, Policy Statement, (Proper Name) recognizes the dignity and value of each Resident's right to make health care decisions and to be fully informed of his or her complete health status. Furthermore, (Proper name) recognizes the right of each Resident to issue Advance Directives regarding his or her health care . 8. (Proper name) will provide education and training to its staff regarding its policies and procedures regarding Advance Directives. Resident #43 Record review of Resident #43's Mississippi Physician Orders for Sustaining Treatment (POST) for Advance Directives dated [DATE] revealed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The resident did not sign his Advance Directive on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident information was kept confidential and not accessible to the public for one (1) of four (4) survey days. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights and Quality of Life with an effective date of 5/1/2012 revealed under, The resident has the right to .personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and clinical records. An observation on 9/16/24 at 9:04 AM, revealed a medication cart sitting outside the dining room door leading to the B Hall with a visible list of resident names, room numbers, code status and if they were on hospice or dialysis laying on top of the medication cart for anyone to see. An interview and observation on 9/16/24 at 9:06 AM, with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) confirmed the resident list of names was visible on top of the medication cart and would be a violation of the resident's privacy. She stated that the nurse should have put it away so that it could not be seen. She revealed the medication cart was Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a new employee had a background check completed prior to working for one (1) of five (5) new employee personnel records reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, (Facilities Proper Name) Background Check Policy with a revision date of 2/13/17 revealed under, Policy .It is the policy of (Facilities Proper Name) Management Services, as part of its hiring procedures, to conduct criminal background checks on all applicants offered employment to support workplace productivity, safety and security. Record review of Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager's personnel file revealed she was hired by the facility on 8/13/24 and her background check was completed on 6/10/22 and was outdated. An interview on 9/19/24 at 11:10 AM, with the Administrator confirmed that new staff's background checks have to have been done within the last two years. She stated we have called to see if we could get a more up to date one but have not received an answer. An interview on 9/19/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was revised and updated for one (1) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #33 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans with a revision date of 10/21 revealed under, Policy: . Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change. An observation of Resident #33 on 9/16/24 at 9:38 AM and on 09/17/24 at 8:30 AM revealed, she was lying in bed with a raised perimeter air mattress intact to the bed. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/17/24 at 10:30 AM revealed, Resident #33 had a raised perimeter air mattress to keep her from rolling out of the bed. Record review of Resident #33's Fall Care Plan revealed, the care plan was not revised to add the secured perimeter air mattress. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 9/18/24 at 2:40 PM, revealed the purpose of the care plan was to provide the necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice for a resident with a physician order for intravenous (IV) antibiotics for one (1) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #20 Findings Include: Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, dated September 19, 2024, and signed by the Administrator revealed (Proper name of facility) does not have a policy on Standards of Practice. Record review of the August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #20 revealed, an order dated 8/4/24, Meropenem Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 500 MG (milligrams) use 500 MG (milligrams) intravenously every day shift for infection Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 5 (five) days in sodium chloride 0.9% (percent) 100 ml (milliliters) IVPB (intravenous piggyback). The MAR was initialed as administered on 8/5/24 and 8/7/24, with no documentation to support medication was administered on 8/6, 8/8, and 8/9 with the MAR left blank. An interview with Resident #20 on 9/19/24 at 8:35 AM, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly assessed and consent obtained for bed rails for two (2) of 22 sampled residents. Resident #33 and #60 Findings Include: Record review of the Facility policy titled, Restraint with an effective date of 11/28/16 revealed Process: . When a patient/resident is determined to need a restraint, an evaluation will be completed at least on a quarterly basis or with a significant change in the patients/residents condition. This evaluation will assist in determining continued need or possible reduction/elimination . Resident #33 An observation of Resident #33 on 9/16/24 at 9:38 AM, revealed, she was lying in bed, arousable with one-half (1/2) side rails that were up on both sides of the bed and a raised perimeter air mattress was intact to the bed. An observation on 9/17/24 at 8:30 AM, revealed Resident #33 was lying in bed with her eyes closed with one-half (1/2) side rails up on both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that met the residents' choices and failed to serve the food in an attractive and palatable manner for four (4) of twelve residents reviewed for dining. Resident #20, #27, #43, and #50. Findings Include: CROSS REFERENCE F565 Record review of the facility policy Menus revised 10/2022 revealed Menus will be planned in advance to meet the nutritional needs of the residents .6. Menus will be served as written, unless a substitution is provided in response to preference . Resident #20 An interview on 9/16/24 at 10:57 AM, with Resident #20 revealed, she did not like the food that she was served. An observation of the lunch meal on 9/16/24 at 12:50 PM revealed, Resident #20's meal ticket read, Renal and listed the foods as, Baked chicken breast on a bun, grilled cheese sandwich, garden pasta salad, green peas, apple crisp, soup, unsweetened tea 8 ounces. The food on the tray was untouched,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity when she asked for assistance with toileting and a staff member refused for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Resident's Rights and Quality of Life dated May 1, 2012, revealed It is the policy of Advocate that all residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with an access to people and services inside and outside the facility . On 06/11/24 at 10:30 AM, an observation and interview with Resident #1 revealed her sitting in a wheelchair propelling herself in her room. She revealed that she was not able to walk, that she wore briefs and required help to use the bathroom. She revealed that she pressed the call light when she needed her brief changed and they usually came within a few minutes. Resident #1 stated, I'm so tired of pissing my clothes. Resident #1 revealed that when she asked for help to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plans for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Resident #1 and Resident #8. Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy, Care Plans with effective date of October 2021, revealed care plans will be developed for all patients and residents based upon the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual guidelines. Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change. RESIDENT #1 Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated on 09/22/2023 revealed that she had a self-care deficit related to decreased functional abilities, weakness and had interventions that included extensive assistance with personal hygiene and to provide cueing, supervision, and assistance with ADLs as needed. An observation and interview with Resident #1 on 06/12/24 at 10:20 AM revealed facial hair, one approximately two (2) inches long on her left lower jaw and there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide oral care for a resident (Resident #8) and failed to shave residents (Resident #1 and Resident #8) for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) dated August 2021, revealed, Policy: Ensure ADL's are provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice, the care plan, and reasonable accommodations of the resident's choices and preferences . RESIDENT #1 On 06/12/24 at 10:20 AM, an observation and interview with Resident #1 revealed facial hair, one approximately two (2) inches long on her left lower jaw and there was an area approximately three inches by three inches with scattered black hairs that measured approximately one-half inch to three-fourths inch on her lower chin. Resident #1 revealed that she didn't like to have facial hair and wanted it gone. She revealed that the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had shaved it before but hadn't lately. She stated, I don't like to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was implemented for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #1 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, MDS (Minimum Data Set) and Care Plans with effective date of August, 2019 revealed,Policy: Care plans and MDS will be developed and maintained per RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Guidelines. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan initiated on 05/11/2023 revealed Focus: Self-Care Deficit related to: decreased functional abilities, impaired cognition/dementia, pain, weakness .Interventions . Assist with bathing as needed . Nail, hair, and oral care daily and as needed. Observe skin for alterations in skin integrity during baths and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care - report to nurse as needed . During a phone interview on 02/08/24 at 12:50 PM, with Resident #1's Resident Representative (RR) revealed that the care at the facility was pretty good, but that they sometimes left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received her scheduled baths in January and failed to provide nail care for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #1 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, ADL's (Activities of Daily Living), with effective date August 2021, revealed Policy: Ensure ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) are provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice, the care plan, and reasonable accommodation of the resident's choices and preferences . On 02/07/24 at 10:30 AM, an observation and interview with Resident #1, revealed her lying in bed in her room. Resident #1's right hand was closed tightly and resting on the bed down by her side. Resident #1 revealed that she normally got a bath every other day but had missed a few baths over the last few weeks and revealed that they washed her hair about once a week. On 02/08/24 at 12:50 PM, a phone interview with Resident #1's Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet the needs of the residents for four (4) of 4 days of survey. Findings include: The facility Administrator provided a statement on 6/23/23 that the facility follows the state regulations for 2.8 staffing ratio and they do not have a policy to staff according to acuity level. An interview on 06/19/23 at 12:45 PM, with Resident #6 on the A hall revealed the resident stated he was wet. He stated that he had not been changed since the night shift. An observation on 6/19/23 at 12:48 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 provided incontinent care to Resident #6. The resident's brief was saturated with dark yellow colored urine and CNA #3 stated the resident's brief should not be that wet. She stated that he should have already been changed and that they get here and start checking residents and then the trays come out, so they have to stop and pass the meal trays out. She stated she had to help change out a mattress on a bed. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote the dignity of a resident as evidenced by failure to change a brief when wet for one (1) of sixty-seven residents with incontinence. Resident #6 Findings include: Review of the facility policy, undated, titled Your Resident Rights and Protection Under State and Federal Law, revealed as a resident of a nursing home, you have the same rights and protections as all United States citizens. Nursing home residents also have certain rights and protection under state and federal law. Under Quality of Life, it was revealed that a nursing home must care for you in a manner and environment that promotes the maintenance and enhancement of your quality of life. Under Dignity and Respect, you have the right to be treated with consideration and respect in full recognition of your dignity and individuality. During an interview, on 06/19/23 at 12:45 PM, Resident #6 stated he was wet and that he had not been changed since the night shift. An observation and interview on 6/19/23 at 12:48 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain call lights within reach of the resident for two (2) of twenty-six residents reviewed. Residents #6 and Resident #20 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, undated, revealed the purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow the residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. The policy explanation and compliance guidelines reveal each resident will be evaluated for unique needs and preferences to determine special accommodation that may be needed in order for them to utilize the call system. Call light is within reach of the resident and secured as needed. All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding. If the staff member cannot provide what the resident desires, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to resolve a resident grievance in a timely manner for five (5) of 17 residents reviewed for unresolved grievances in the resident council meeting. Resident #26, 38, 51, 55 and 80 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Customer Concern Grievance Policy with a revision date of July 2018 revealed under Purpose .Support each customer's (patient's/resident's) right to voice concerns (grievances) and to ensure after receiving a concern, the center actively seeks a resolution and keeps the customer appropriately apprised of its progress toward resolution. The goal is to encourage open communication of customer concerns in an environment free from reprisal, retaliation, or discrimination. We have a commitment to customer service and have systems in place to address concerns. Our Grievance Official is the center Administrator. The Grievance Officials contact information, including phone number and email…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to create a clean and safe environment as evidenced by a dirty wheelchair and black substance on a resident's refrigerator for two (2) of 26 residents sampled. Resident #26 and #77. Findings include: A review of the facility policy on letterhead dated June 22, 2023, revealed, (Proper Name) utilizes the EMBRACE guideline to manage cleaning of equipment . Observation to review .Access wheelchairs for cleanliness. An interview and observation on 06/20/23 at 4:30 PM, Resident #26 voiced concern about his wheelchair not being cleaned. He revealed he takes a napkin and tries to clean it off but doesn't think it has ever been cleaned. The wheelchair had a thick black and gray substance on the frame and the spokes of the wheels. An interview on 06/21/23 at 8:15 AM, with the Director of Nurses (DON) revealed the nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) are supposed to clean the wheelchairs on the 11 PM-7 AM shift.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to send a written transfer/discharge notice to a resident or resident representative for a hospital transfer for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #84 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer & Discharge with a revision date of November 1, 2016, revealed under Notice Requirements .#4 Before (Proper name of the facility) transfers or discharges the Resident, it shall notify the Resident and the Resident's Representative of the basis for the transfer or discharge in a language and manner they understand; and will also notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Record review of Resident #84's electronic record revealed there was no discharge/transfer notice for the resident's hospital stay on 5/1/23. An interview on 6/20/23 at 1:30 PM, with the Administrator confirmed that Resident #84 was discharged to the hospital on 5/1/23 and did not have a discharge/transfer notice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative of the bedhold amount for a hospital discharge for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #84 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold Policy with a revision date of November 1, 2016 revealed under Policy Statement .(the facilities proper name) will, in accordance with Federal and State regulations, hold a Resident's bed during a temporary hospitilazation or therapautic leave. This review revealed under Procedure .#1 Before the Center transfers a Resident to a hospital or the Resident goes on therapeutic leave, the Center shall provide Resident or his or her Resident Representative this Bed Hold Policy. Record review of Resident #84's electronic record revealed there was no bedhold notice for the resident's hospital stay on 5/1/23. An interview on 6/20/23 at 1:30 PM, with the Administrator confirmed that Resident #84 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility policy review and record review the facility failed to develop or implement a care plan for four (4) of 26 care plans reviewed. Resident #6, 20, 25, 30. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled, Care Plans, revealed care plans will be developed for all residents based upon RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual guidelines. Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change. Resident #6 Record review revealed a care plan in place for Resident #6 with a focus of alteration in elimination related to bladder and bowel incontinence with an intervention to check and change every two (2) hours and prn (as needed). Record review revealed a care plan in place for Resident #6 related to risk for fall and an intervention to place call light in easy reach on right side. An interview on 06/19/23 at 12:45 PM revealed Resident #6 stated he was wet and that he had not been changed since the night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, facility policy review, and record review the facility failed to provide care to maintain hygiene as evidenced by failure to provide shower, and nail care for two (2) of twenty-six residents reviewed. Resident #25 and Resident #30. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) revealed under, Policy: . Care and services will be provided for the following Activities of Daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care; . Also revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #25 An observation on 06/19/23 at 10:55 AM, of Resident #25's nails revealed long nails on both hands with a brown substance underneath, fingers bent inwards toward palms and nails were impressed into the skin in the palms. An interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the safety of resident as evidenced by failure to secure smoking materials for one (1) of 18 smokers in the facility. Resident #57. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Safe Smoking with an effective date of November 1, 2016, revealed, Purpose .To maximize our ability to provide a safe environment for all residents/patients who smoke, while taking into account non-smoking residents. Procedure .4. Staff members will monitor or obtain fire-igniting materials (matches/lighters) for the benefit of smokers at the nurses' station or other designated location . 5. Tobacco materials (cigarettes/cigars/chewing tobacco/snuff/electronic smoking devices) themselves, in addition to fire igniting materials, may have increased control or be removed if smoking policy violations have occurred or as a general safety policy for all residents . An observation and interview on 06/19/23 at 02:55 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a timely manner to a resident that was incontinent for one (1) of sixty seven incontinent residents. Resident #6. Findings include: An interview, on 06/19/23 at 12:45 PM, revealed Resident #6 stated that he was wet. He stated that he had not been changed since the night shift. The State Agency (SA) informed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 the resident needed assistance. Resident #6 told LPN #4 that he was wet and not been changed since the night shift was there. LPN #4 requested Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 to assist with incontinent care. An observation, on 6/19/23 at 12:48 PM, revealed LPN #4 and CNA #3 provided incontinent care to Resident #6. The resident's brief was saturated with dark yellow colored urine. CNA #3 stated the resident's brief should not be that wet and that he should have already been changed. CNA #3 confirmed that she was assigned to Resident #6 and stated they get here and start checking residents and then the trays come out, so they have to stop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to store controlled medications in a separately locked permanently affixed compartment in the medication room refrigerator for one (1) of (1) medication storage rooms observed. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances revealed, . Medications listed in Schedules II, III, IV and V shall be stored under double lock Charge nurse shall maintain possession of the key(s) to controlled substances secured in the medication room refrigerator including individual resident/patient refrigerated controlled substances emergency drug kit medications requiring refrigeration An observation and interview on 6/21/23 at 7:55 AM, of the medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 revealed that the facility had a refrigerator that stored controlled substances that must be refrigerated. The State Agency (SA) observed a pad lock on the refrigerator handle. An observation inside the refrigerator revealed a small black lock box that was removed by LPN #2 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidenced by failure to use a barrier during medication administration of a respiratory inhaler, for one (1) of 37 medications observed. Resident #9 Findings include: Record review of a typed document dated 6/22/23 and signed by the facility Administrator revealed Re: Barrier Usage with Medication Pass . We utilize both [NAME] & [NAME]. 8th Edition, Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques and Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques, Skills Performance Checklist as our resource guide for clinical standards. Record review of the PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST SKILL 21-1- ADMINISTERING ORAL MEDICATIONS revealed .IMPLEMENTATION: 1 .c. Arranged medication tray and cups in preparation area or on cart outside of room . An observation on 06/21/23 at 9:05 AM, of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 while preparing medications for Resident #9 revealed she placed an albuterol inhaler on the surface…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,284 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-08-11
  • $3,832 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
  • $3,832 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
  • $3,832 — penalty dated 2024-09-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Diversicare Of BessemerBessemer, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of HaysvilleHaysville, KS 1 of 5Diversicare Of MeridianMeridian, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of Oak RidgeOak Ridge, TN 1 of 5Diversicare Of OxfordOxford, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of RipleyRipley, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SedgwickSedgwick, KS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SouthavenSouthaven, MS 1 of 5Lampasas Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5Windsor HouseHuntsville, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of AmoryAmory, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ArabArab, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BatesvilleBatesville, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of BoazBoaz, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BrookhavenBrookhaven, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ChanuteChanute, KS 2 of 5Diversicare Of Council GroveCouncil Grove, KS 2 of 5Diversicare Of EuporaEupora, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of FoleyFoley, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of MontgomeryMontgomery, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of Moss PointMoss Point, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of Pell CityPell City, AL 2 of 5St Martin's In The PinesIrondale, AL 3 of 5Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of Copper BasinCopperhill, TN 3 of 5Diversicare Of LulingLuling, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of OneontaOneonta, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of QuitmanQuitman, MS 3 of 5Diversicare Of RiverchaseBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of ShelbyShelby, MS 3 of 5Park PlaceSelma, AL 3 of 5Yorktown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, TX 4 of 5Baron House Of HueytownHueytown, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of Big SpringsHuntsville, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of HutchinsonHutchinson, KS 4 of 5Diversicare Of LanettLanett, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of WinfieldWinfield, AL 4 of 5Hartford Health CareHartford, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of GreensboroGreensboro, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of LarnedLarned, KS

Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIVERSICARE LEASING COMPANY III LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2016
ADVOCAT FINANCE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2016
DAC NEWCORP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/04/2022
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/10/1994
DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LP.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2016
KELLMAN, FRANKLINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/13/2024
KOHN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/19/2021
RATNER, ERANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/13/2024
BODIE, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2020
NEE, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/20/2023
WEISHAAR, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2003
BENNETT, SLYMECEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/20/2022
DMS GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/04/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$637K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 5%Other / private 23%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $637K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,080per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$316per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Mississippi
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,885/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,369/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next