No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Diversicare Of Council Grove

400 Sunset Drive, Council Grove, KS 66846 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (620) 767-5172 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (620) 767-5172 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
604 N Washington St · (620) 767-5126 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
123 W Main St · (620) 767-6731 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
115 E Main St · (620) 767-5219 · Call to confirm hours
Park
502 Neosho St · (620) 767-5413 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
501 Country Ln · (620) 767-5782

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.1%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.1%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.9%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.8%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.3%73.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission11.0%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.7%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.161.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.452.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.5%CMS range 24.8–56.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.3–18.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.37
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
41.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 45.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-08)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents, with two residents reviewed for wounds. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate wound care for Resident (R)1 to prevent the wound from being contaminated with maggots (fly larvae). This deficient practice led to R1's right lower leg wound becoming contaminated with maggots, which caused physical and psychosocial discomfort.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic veinous hypertension (high blood pressure in the legs) with inflammation of an unspecified lower extremity, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), an open right lower leg wound, and need for assistance with personal care.R1's 03/26/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high-contact care) while providing direct care to a Resident (R) 5 with open wounds to her left heel and left gluteal (buttock) fold. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during a wound measurement for R1. The facility failed to properly transport clean linen and personal linens in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination.Findings included:1. On 07/06/2026 at 09:45 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M was observed to have several uncovered washcloths and towels held up against her uniform that she carried in the 100 hallways.On 07/07/2026 at 08:58 AM, CNA M reported that she should have covered the pile of washcloths and towels she carried down the hallways and not have them up against her uniform. 2. On 07/06/2026 at 12:00 PM, Laundry Staff W delivered personal linens with a covered cart. As Laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP).Findings included:- On 07/08/2026 at 12:45 PM, Administrative Nurse E (Interim) revealed she could not locate her IP certificate. She reported that when she accepted the interim position, an IP certification was not mentioned, and she reported that she really had not completed much of the IP duties at the facility. Administrative Nurse E reported that she was enrolled at this time and taking courses for IP.On 07/08/2026 at 12:50 PM, Administrative Nurse E produced the antibiotic/infection control log binder. There was a Completion for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course dated 07/07/2026 for Administrative Staff A. On 07/08/26 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Staff A reported that she thought Administrative Nurse E had a current IP certificate and expected the facility to have a designated certified IP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-07-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff who worked in the facility for more than 12 months were reviewed for the required in-service training. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for CNA staff with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Findings included:- Review of CNA personnel files revealed the following:CNA N, hired on 04/04/2007, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required.Certified Medication Aide (CMA) T, hired on 12/20/2012, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required. Additionally, CMA T lacked the required education on abuse, neglect, exploitation, and dementia education. CNA MM, hired on 03/25/2023, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required. Additionally, CNA MM lacked the required dementia training. CNA M, hired on 03/07/2024, lacked the required dementia training.CNA O, hired on 02/12/2025, lacked the total hours calculated for the 12 hours required. Additionally, CNA O lacked the required dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-08 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the Care Area Assessment (CAA- analysis of findings), related to a Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), for seven Residents (R)2, R3, R4, R7, R25, R48, and R52, to address the underlying cause, risk factors, and other contributing factors to ensure the resident received care based on their individual needs.Findings included:- Review of resident's most recent Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) documentation revealed the triggered Care Area Assessment (CAA) lacked completion as follows:1. R2's Annual MDS, dated 02/18/2026, lacked completion of CAAs dated 02/18/2026 for Communication, Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility), Psychosocial Well-Being, Behavioral Symptoms, Activities, Falls, Nutritional Status, Dehydration/fluid Maintenance, Pressure Ulcer/Injury, and Psychotropic Drug Use.2. R3's admission MDS, dated 02/12/2026, lacked completion of CAAs dated 03/03/2026 for Pain, Cognitive Loss/Delirium, Functional Abilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when two errors were identified, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41 percent. Finding included:- R22's Physician Orders recorded an order for acetaminophen (a medication to treat mild-to-moderate pain and fevers), tablet, 325 milligrams (mg), give 2 tablets by mouth three times a day related to chronic pain at 07:00 AM, 11:00 AM, and 05:00 PM, date ordered 04/16/24.R22's Physician Orders recorded an order for Refresh Tears ophthalmic solution (fast-acting, original-strength lubricating eye drops designed to soothe mild, occasionally dry eyes), instill 1 drop in both eyes three.times a day related to dry eye syndrome at 07:00 AM, 01:00 PM, and 08:00 PM, date ordered 03/09/25. On 07/07/2026 at 09:03 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R prepared R22's medications; she reported that she administered R22's 07:00 AM medications with all her other AM medications, as she has always done that. CMA R administered artificial tears, one drop in each eye,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-08 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide or obtain an informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccine (a vaccine designed to prevent highly contagious respiratory virus) for Resident (R) 5, R44, R8, R48, and R49. Findings included:1. R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2021.2. R44's EMR lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2024. 3. R8's EMR lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2023.4. R48's EMR lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2024.5. R49's EMR lacked documentation of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered since 2024.On 07/08/2026 at 12:10 PM, Administrative Staff A provided information for COVID-19 vaccines; she reported she did not have current consents/declinations for the residents. On 07/08/2026 at 01:50 PM, Administrative Staff A reported she was unsure if the facility offered the COVID-19 vaccine education to the staff. Consultant Staff HH (Regional VP Administrator) reported that when an employee was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of Resident (R) 53's discharge from the facility. The facility failed to complete a discharge summary which included recapitulation of R6's stay and/or reconciliation of his medications following discharge.Findings included:1. Resident (R) 53's Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE].R53's Discharge Return not Anticipated MDS, dated 05/07/2026, documented the resident's discharge from the facility to the community on 05/07/2026.R53's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Social Service Progress Note documentation, dated 05/07/2026 at 01:30 PM, included that the resident does not want to stay at the facility. She left the facility against medical advice. Her EMR lacked documentation for notification of the Ombudsman of the resident's discharge from the facility. The facility was unable to provide the documentation upon request.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for activities of daily living (ADLs) for Resident (R) 8, who was not showered for two weeks, and R25 had dirty fingernails.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R8 's diagnoses included left femur fracture/displacement (a traumatic bone break where two ends of the bone separate out of their normal position), Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), diabetes mellitus type II (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and polyneuropathy (a neurological condition characterized by damage to multiple peripheral nerves simultaneously). R8's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 04/29/2026, documented a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R) 25 when staff failed to respond to R25's requests for help and failed to provide foot pedals when staff propelled the wheelchair. Findings included:- R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of parkinsonism (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). R25's 11/28/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status could not be completed as R25 was rarely/never understood) Staff interview completed, and R25's MDS documented she had severely impaired cognition. R25's MDS documented she had one non-injury fall, and she required total staff assistance with wheelchair mobility. R25's 12/05/2025 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) lacked a documented CAA. R25's 05/06/26 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide or obtain an informed declination for the influenza vaccine (vaccine designed to prevent highly contagious viral infection) form to Resident (R) 5, and R8. Findings included:1. R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that no education was provided when she received the influenza vaccine on 11/07/2025. Consent was documented as confirmed. 2. R8's EMR documented no education was provided when he declined the influenza vaccine on 10/31/2025. The facility was unable to provide a signed declined Patient/Resident Declination/Authorization Form (Flu).On 07/08/2026 at 12:10 PM, Administrative Staff A provided information for influenza vaccine of a list of handwritten residents' names, a copy of the sticker of the influenza vaccine lot number, expiration date, and site the vaccine was administered. Administrative Staff A reported she had no current signed consents or declinations for the resident's influenza vaccines. On 07/08/2026 at 01:00 PM, Administrative Staff A reviewed the EMR for the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in the common living area for the residents of the facility. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased quality of life.Findings included:- Observation on 07/08/25 at 10:38 AM revealed a strong odor of urine upon entering the facility from the east doors to the A-Hall unit.Observation on 07/08/25 at 10:42 AM, R3 sat in a reclining chair in the common area. R3's pants were wet on the front between the legs, and the seat of the chair was saturated. There was a strong odor of urine.Observation on 07/08/25 at 10:54 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N brought a sit-to-stand lift to assist R3 out of the recliner. As they lifted R3, they could see that the recliner and R3 were saturated. CNA M did not clean the chair, but requested that someone call housekeeping to clean the chair. On 07/08/25 at 11:16 AM, the recliner remained uncleaned. CNA M again requested that a staff member call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to inadequate hand hygiene during wound care and inadequate cleaning of furniture. This deficient practice had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the facility.Findings included:- Resident (R)3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness) due to cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and a history of urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). R3's 04/27/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R3 was always incontinent of urine and bowel, and she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 46 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pest control in the facility. This deficient practice placed the affected residents of the facility at risk for decreased health and wellness. (Refer to F684) Findings included: - On 07/08/25 at 08:05 AM, 10:20 AM, and 12:00 PM, observation of R2's room revealed a lot of flies in the room. Further observation revealed a fly paper strip hanging from the ceiling in R2's room next to the closet. On 07/08/25 at 10:05 AM, 01:30 PM, and 03:05 PM, observation of R1's room revealed a lot of flies in R1's room. R1's room did not show any evidence of any fly mitigation attempts. On 07/08/25 at 01:30 PM, observation of wound care on R1's right lower leg revealed live maggots (fly larvae) on R1's right lower leg wound.On 07/08/25 at 02:10 PM, Administrative Nurse D revealed that the facility had been concerned about flies for a while, and Administrative Staff A had been implementing fly mitigation strategies. On 07/08/25 at 05:00 PM, Administrative Staff A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 46 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner when Resident (R)2 received personal care without privacy. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and embarrassment.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a local infection of the skin and unspecified adult personality disorder.R2's 06/30/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition.Observation on 07/08/25 at 12:00 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered R2's room without shutting the door. LN G did not close the curtain to provide privacy. LN G proceeded to perform a dressing change on both of the resident's legs with the door and privacy curtain open, leaving the resident visible from the hall.On 07/08/25 at 12:25 PM, LN G confirmed she should have provided privacy for R2 when she provided his dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 52 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for involuntary discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility initiated a 30-day involuntary discharge for Resident (R)1 though R1's clinical record did not contain evidence to validate the reason for the involuntary discharge. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for impaired health and well-being and involuntary discharge from the facility. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought) diabetes mellitus type two (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure (chronic inability of the heart to pump blood sufficiently which results in shortness of breath), visual loss [to] both eyes, personality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS on the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report weekend staffing for Quarter 3 of 2023 (April 1-June 3), Quarter 4 of 2023 (July 1-September 30), Quarter 1 of 2024 (October 1-December 31) and Quarter 2 of 2024 (January 1-March 31). Findings Included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY), Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 3), Quarter 4 (July 1-September 30), Quarter 1 2024 (October 1-December 31) and Quarter 2 (January 1-March 31), revealed excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the facility's daily staffing sheets revealed the facility's weekend staffing to be the same as the staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for four or the sampled residents, Resident (R) 18 and R8 for scabies (a contagious skin infection caused by mites) infections, R41 for use of urine collection leg bag device, and R19 for self-removal of anchoring device, and alternative catheter stabilizing devices. Findings included: - Review of R8's medical record, revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and vision loss. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed the resident required extensive/total assistance with all ADLs. The Care Plan reviewed 06/07/24, instructed staff the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to two Residents (R)19, by failing to cover the resident's bare lap, which left the silicone portion of an indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter that is inserted into the bladder and left in place for many days or weeks) visible to others while in the dining room and R41 for failure to utilize a dignity cover for the collection leg bag of the resident's indwelling urinary catheter while in the dining room and common's area. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)41's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of obstructive and reflux uropathy (when urine flow is blocked (partially or completely) through the ureter (the duct by which urine passes from the kidney to the bladder), bladder, or urethra (the duct by which urine is conveyed out of the body from the bladder) due to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, which included Resident (R)18 reviewed for reasonable accommodation. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of R18's needs when the facility failed to follow up on recommendations for a different wheelchair, which would meet the resident's physical needs and preference to maintain his independence. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)18's Physician Orders, dated 08/18/24, included diagnoses muscular dystrophy (MD - group of inherited disorders that involve muscle weakness and loss of muscle tissue, and worsen over time), contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of the right and left ankles, immobility syndrome (paraplegic-paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Modified Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 10/11/23 documentation included a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, which included one Resident (R)18 reviewed for notification of change in condition. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's chosen representative when the resident required a new form of treatment, related to the resident's newly diagnosed scabies infestation. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 18's Physician Orders, dated 08/18/24, included diagnoses muscular dystrophy (MD-group of inherited disorders that involve muscle weakness and loss of muscle tissue, and worsen over time), contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) of the right and left ankles, immobility syndrome (paraplegic) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, and scabies infestation (contagious infestation of the skin by burrowing mites). The Modified Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 10/11/23 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents selected for review, which included three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided safe transfers for one, Resident (R)19, of the three residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)19's medical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (CVA stroke sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a censes of 43 residents with 14 residents selected for review and three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to analyze one Resident (R) 95's three-day voiding diary to determine type of incontinence and pattern of incontinence to mitigate fall occurrences and provide sanitary urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder) care for one resident (R19) to prevent urinary tract infections of the three residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 19's medical record revealed diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (CVA stroke sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents, 14 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided sanitary care to respiratory equipment and administration of aerosolized (vapor) medication for one Resident (R) 39. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)39's medical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) and congestive heart failure (CHF a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS). Dated 02/05/24, assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, with indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 02/05/24, assessed the resident had COPD and CHF The resident had a low oxygen level without her continuous flow oxygen and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents with 14 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) 12 and R 27 remained free from unnecessary medications related to failure to administer as needed (PRN) medications for bowel movements (BM). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 12's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of constipation (the inability to pass stool). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and toileting. She was always continent of bowel and had no constipation during the assessment period. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/28/23, documented the resident required staff assistance with transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-05 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility lacked evidence the required committee members attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee meetings at least quarterly. This placed the residents who resided in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - On 12/05/22 at 01:35 PM, , the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets lacked signatures of attendees/committee members on the sheets. The sheets had just an X placed by members who allegedly attended the meetings. On 12/05/22 at 02:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated the facilty changed to electronic sign in sheets and the facility did not have staff who attended sign the sheets. The facility's Quality Assurance& Performance Improvement Policy, revised 03/13/2020, documented it was the facility policy each resident and/or patient received the necessary care to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being, in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with no COVID (an acute respiratory illness capable of producing severe respiratory complications including death) positive residents identified. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify high transmission rates for COVID and failed to ensure facility staff wore masks to protect residents and staff, and prevent COVID transmission for the 42 residents residing in the facility. This placed all residents at increased risk for transmission of infectious disease. Findings included: - On 11/29/22 at 08:00AM, upon entrance into the facility observation revealed the facility staff did not wear masks. On 11/29/22 at 09:30AM, Administrative Nurse D verified that facility staff were not wearing masks. On 11/29/22 at 09:40AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility received an electronic message every Monday in the late afternoon regarding the transmission rate for COVID and then mads the decision if facial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment in one of three halls on the A unit and one of three halls and the commons area by the nurse's station in the B unit. This placed the residents at risk for an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: - On 11/29/22 at 10:20 AM, observation revealed Resident (R) 7's room door would not easily latch. On 11/29/22 at 10:25 AM, observation revealed R10's room door casing was not attached to the frame, approximately three to four inches at the bottom, and R10's transition flooring piece into the bathroom from her room lifted from the floor approximately three inches. On 11/30/22 at 11:59 AM, observation revealed a dark brown recliner in the B unit commons area by the nurse's station had fraying of the material on the sides of the footrest approximately 12 inches by three to four inches, and the footrest would not stay up. On 12/05/22 at 12:13 PM, Maintenance Staff U…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with six reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide shaving for dependent Resident (R) 28, which placed the resident at risk of impaired comfort and dignity. Finding included: - R28's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (CVA- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain ) affecting left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (dysfunction of nerves causing numbness or weakness), and unspecified lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prevent a decrease in range of motion (ROM)/mobility for one of six residents, Resident (R) 4, reviewed for activities of daily living. This placed R4 at risk of further contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint) and impaired mobility. - R4's diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), localized edema (swelling), psoriasis (chronic skin disorder characterized by red patches covered by thick, dry silvery adherent scales), anemia (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), muscle weakness, pain in joints of right and left hands, contracture of right and left hands, and other reduced mobility. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had severe cognitive impairment, inattention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure and record consistent medication administration for Resident (R) 29, and R28. This placed the residents at risk for ineffective medication regimen. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), gastro- esophageal reflux (GERD-backflow of stomach contents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for R29's antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medication. This placed R29 at risk for complications related to receiving an unnecessary antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented he had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), major depressive disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to display accurate, publicly accessible, and identifiable staffing information, on a daily basis, for the 43 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: - Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheets, for the past 90 days, revealed the actual hours worked had not been completed on the daily staffing sheets. On 08/28/24 at 09:37 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the facility did not include the actual hours worked on the daily staffing sheets. The staffing sheets were completed for the day and hung up each morning without any changes made. The facility lacked a policy for the completion of daily staffing sheets. The facility failed to properly complete the daily staffing sheets for the residents of the facility.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 43 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Diversicare Of BessemerBessemer, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of HaysvilleHaysville, KS 1 of 5Diversicare Of MeridianMeridian, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of Oak RidgeOak Ridge, TN 1 of 5Diversicare Of OxfordOxford, AL 1 of 5Diversicare Of RipleyRipley, MS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SedgwickSedgwick, KS 1 of 5Diversicare Of SouthavenSouthaven, MS 1 of 5Lampasas Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLampasas, TX 1 of 5Windsor HouseHuntsville, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of AmoryAmory, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ArabArab, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BatesvilleBatesville, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of BoazBoaz, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of BrookhavenBrookhaven, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of ChanuteChanute, KS 2 of 5Diversicare Of EuporaEupora, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of FoleyFoley, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of MontgomeryMontgomery, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of Moss PointMoss Point, MS 2 of 5Diversicare Of Pell CityPell City, AL 2 of 5Diversicare Of TupeloTupelo, MS 2 of 5St Martin's In The PinesIrondale, AL 3 of 5Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterLockhart, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of Copper BasinCopperhill, TN 3 of 5Diversicare Of LulingLuling, TX 3 of 5Diversicare Of OneontaOneonta, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of QuitmanQuitman, MS 3 of 5Diversicare Of RiverchaseBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Diversicare Of ShelbyShelby, MS 3 of 5Park PlaceSelma, AL 3 of 5Yorktown Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, TX 4 of 5Baron House Of HueytownHueytown, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of Big SpringsHuntsville, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of HutchinsonHutchinson, KS 4 of 5Diversicare Of LanettLanett, AL 4 of 5Diversicare Of WinfieldWinfield, AL 4 of 5Hartford Health CareHartford, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of GreensboroGreensboro, AL 5 of 5Diversicare Of LarnedLarned, KS

Showing 40 of 43; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIVERSICARE KANSAS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/29/2013
ADVOCAT FINANCE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
DAC NEWCORP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/04/2022
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/10/1994
DIVERSICARE HOLDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
DIVERSICARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LP.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/29/2013
SIEGLE, LORAIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/15/2016
FISCHER, BRADIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
KELLMAN, FRANKLINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/13/2024
KOHN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/19/2021
RATNER, ERANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/13/2024
BODIE, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2020
NEE, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/20/2023
WEISHAAR, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$534K
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 4%Other / private 23%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $534K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$243per resident / day
operating cost
$7,374per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$252per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175239. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next