Diversicare Of Quitman

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a resident-on-resident altercation when Resident #61 wandered into another resident's room, which resulted in Resident #61 receiving a hematoma to her forehead and an emergency department (ED) visit for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, Resident #61. Findings included: A record review of the facility's Investigation Template, dated 11/11/2024, revealed that at approximately 6:20 AM on 11/11/2024, a floor tech summoned help to Resident #91's room. Staff found water on the floor, a water pitcher spilled, and Resident #91 sitting on her bed holding her purse. Resident #91 stated she thought a man was trying to take her belongings and said she protected herself. Resident #61 was removed from the room and was noted to have a hematoma on the left side of her forehead and redness on the left side of her face. Resident #61 was assisted to her room and transported to a local hospital's ED. A record review of the local hospital's ED report, dated 11/11/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and their resident representatives (RRs) received written notice of hospital transfers, including the reason for the transfer, in a language and manner they could understand for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed for discharges and hospitalization. Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident #98. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Transfer and Discharge, dated 11/1/2016, revealed, .(Proper Name of Facility) shall permit each Resident to remain at the Center, and not transfer or discharge the Resident from the Center except in accordance with Federal and State laws.Procedure.Notice Requirements 4. Before (Proper Name of Facility) transfers or discharges the Resident, it shall notify the Resident and the Resident's Representative of the basis for the or discharge in a language and manner they understand.5.Notice may be made as soon as practicable before a transfer or discharge when.An immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely develop a comprehensive care plan with interventions related to an indwelling catheter placement for one (1) of (20) sampled residents reviewed for care planning. Resident #92. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Care Plans, dated 10/2025, revealed, .Care plans will be developed for all patients and residents.Care plans are developed by the interdisciplinary team.A record review of the Care Plan Report revealed Resident #92 had a care plan Focus of The resident has.Foley Catheter RT (related to) Obstructive Uropathy and Reflux Uropathy initiated on 5/4/26. The care plan included multiple interventions related to catheter care and monitoring, all initiated on 5/4/26.A record review of Section H of the Discharge - Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/21/26 revealed Resident #92 did not have an indwelling catheter when discharged from the facility to an acute care hospital.A record review of the Discharge Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light remained accessible and within reach for one (1) of (20) sampled residents reviewed for call light accessibility. Resident #77.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Nurse Call Policy, dated 9/1/2014, revealed, .Guidelines.2. Each cord needs to be visible and reachable by the resident which it operates for.4. Any component that does not function should be repaired as soon as practically feasible.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #77 on 1/18/24 with diagnoses including Dementia.A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/8/26 revealed Resident #77 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of (13), which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.On 5/18/26 at 11:51 AM, during an observation and interview, Resident #77's call light string was observed out of the resident's reach. Resident #77 stated the string was out of reach…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, record review, and facility guideline review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to reflect Resident #29's current diabetic management orders and interventions for one (1) of (20) sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Resident #29.Findings include:A review of the facility's Care Plans guideline, dated 10/2025, revealed, .Care plans are developed.and revised as needed according to resident and patient status or change.A record review of the Care Plan Report revealed Resident #29 had a focus area for Alteration in Blood Glucose due to: Hyperglycemic Episodes, DX OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS, initiated on 3/15/24 and revised on 6/26/24. Further review revealed interventions including ACCU Checks PRN, accuchecks bid. Notify provider if BG is less than 70 and greater than 450 mg/dL two times a day for DM, and Accuchecks PRN. Notify provider of BG 70 and >400. A comparison of the care plan interventions to the active physician orders revealed Resident #29 did not have physician orders for accuchecks as needed (PRN) or accuchecks twice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services according to professional standards of practice by failing to monitor, assess, and provide appropriate follow-up for abnormal blood sugar results, insulin holds/refusals, and glucagon administration for Resident #29 and by failing to timely implement physician orders related to indwelling catheter management for Resident #92 for two (2) of (20) sampled residents reviewed for treatment and services. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, dated 7/2023, revealed, .Policy: Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.Procedure.When PRN medications are administered, the following documentation is provided.Complaints or symptoms for which the medication was given.If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused.An explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record provided for PRN (as needed) documentation. A review of the Patient Information for GVOKE…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store oxygen tubing and a nasal cannula in a manner to prevent possible contamination and respiratory complications for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #29. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy, Oxygen Guideline, dated 8/1/2024, revealed, .Medical oxygen.is provided in accordance with a health care provider's order and in accordance with acceptable standards of practice.A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #29 on 1/19/25 with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM).A record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/26 revealed Resident #29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15), which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A record review of the Order Summary Report revealed Resident #29 had a physician order dated 5/8/26 for Oxygen at 2L (liters) per nasal cannula for decreased oxygen saturation PRN (as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, facility policy review and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and infection prevention and control practices for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. (Resident #2) Findings include:Record review of the Infection Control Guide policy dated 2025 revealed, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions refers to the expanded use of PPE (personal protective equipment) and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing.residents with wounds.are especially high risk.On 03/17/2026 at 10:40 AM, during an observation of wound care for Resident #2, no signage for EBP was noted on the door. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 performed wound care while wearing gloves but did not don (put on) a gown during care. The resident was noted to have a sacral wound with a large amount of grayish drainage and strong odor. LPN#1 performed hand hygiene; however, handwashing duration was observed to be approximately 10 seconds during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop care plans related to a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (Resident #2) and an indwelling catheter (Resident #74) for two (2) of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: A record review of the facility's policy Comprehensive Care Plan dated May 1, 2012, revealed, Standard: Social services staff and/or designee will participate in the development of a comprehensive care plan for each resident. Practice Guidelines: 1. The interdisciplinary care plan is implemented to guide healthcare center staff in the provision of necessary care and services to obtain and maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident and promotion of the resident and family in planning care . Resident #2 A record review of the Discharge Summary, dated 11/27/2024, for Resident #2 revealed, .There was concern for obstructive sleep apnea .11/25 (2024) .will have to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to privacy by allowing wandering residents to enter resident rooms without invitation or permission (Resident #5 and Resident #57) and failing to cover a urinary drainage bag (Resident #74) for three (3) of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: A record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights & Quality of Life Policy, dated March 13, 2020, revealed, .All patients and residents have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to people and services inside and outside the center . Procedure: A patient or resident has the right .To personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and clinical records . Resident #5 On 12/15/2024 at 10:37 AM, during an interview, Resident #5 stated that a female resident in a wheelchair often entered her room without permission, during the daytime and nighttime hours. She reported this to staff several times, but the behavior has continued. She explained she kept the door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement physician orders for the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (Resident #2) and for an indwelling catheter (Resident #74) for two (2) of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's document, Standards of Practice, dated 12/19/2024 and signed by the Administrator, revealed, The expectation set forth by management is that nurses comply with current standards of practice in terms of following physician's orders . A record review of the facility's policy, Electronic Clinical Records System Timely Admission-readmission Data Entry, undated, revealed, Guideline: The practice of the center clinicians is to enter specific patient critical and pertinent clinical data and documentation related to the patient's admission or readmission in a timely manner into the patient's electronic record . Processes: 2. Entry of Physician's Orders is the responsibility of the Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-12-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE — 44 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $501K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MS