California Park Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 565 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 241 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-01-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, this requirement was not met when the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered to one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This caused Resident 1 to have significant back pain, interrupted his sleeping patterns, and had the potential to negatively affect his health. Findings A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 1/12/24, indicated he was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized for pneumonia (an infection of the lungs), and he had a history of back pain. A review of Resident 1's discharge medication list from an acute care hospital on 1/12/24 indicated that Resident 1 should continue to receive pain medication Norco (a narcotic pain medication) Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (milligrams, a unit of measure), give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain 4-10 (a scale from zero to ten, used to measure pain) for 14 days. Begin 1/13/24 11:15 AM. A review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, Dated 11/24/17, indicated, Pain medication is to be given before pain becomes severe. Response to pain is to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA A) had appropriate competency and skill sets to care for residents based on their identified needs. This failure had the potential to place residents' safety at risk.Findings:On 12/10/25 the facility reported to the California Department of Public Health that a resident-to-resident altercation had occurred on12/8/25 where Resident 1 walked into the dining room and grabbed Resident 2's arm. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/16/25 at 1:32 pm with the Administrator (Admin) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the Admin stated that residents are not to be left unsupervised while in the dining room. CNA A was in the dining room during the resident-to-resident altercation. During the facility investigation, the Admin confirmed from video footage that CNA A failed to perform their job duties by keeping residents safe when Resident 1 was able to grab Resident 2 by the arm. During a facility job description titled Certified Nursing Assistant dated 3/1/14, indicated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a certified nursing assistant (CNA) immediately reported an allegation of rough care to facility management so they could carry out the facility's abuse protocol for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Prevention of, revised 05/10/2018, indicated, PURPOSE: To ensure that residents' rights, safety and well-being are protected by providing a method for the prevention of any type of resident abuse. POLICY: It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents, consultant or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. The section of the policy titled, G. Reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the classes of medications received during the assessment look-back periods for 2 (Resident #74 and Resident #70) of 2 residents reviewed as part of the Resident Assessment task and failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected weight-loss statuses for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #25) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised 11/2019, indicated, 2. Any person who completes any portion of the MDS assessment, tracking form, or correction request form is required to sign the assessment certifying the accuracy of that portion of that assessment. 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 2) was treated with dignity and respect during direct patient care when privacy was not provided, and Resident 2 was rushed. This failure resulted in Resident 2 feeling embarrassed, with increased anxiety, and difficulty sleeping. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy revised 10/20/2017, titled, Resident Rights, indicated the purpose of this policy is to assure protection of rights for residents in the facility. This facility ' s policy also indicted all residents have the right to personal privacy. Staff will protect privacy by announcing themselves or knocking on the door before entering room or privacy curtain and closing the door and pulling the privacy curtain when providing or assisting with personal care. A review of the facility ' s policy revised 9/15/2017, titled, Activities of Daily Living, indicated the purpose of this policy is to preserve the resident ' s ability to carry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses reported changes of condition to the physician for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 had edema (swelling) that went from mild lower leg edema to deep pitting (leaves an indent in skin for a period of time) to the hips. This resulted in a transfer to hospital for fluid overload, ascites (fluid in abdomen), anasarca (fluid throughout all of body, puffy body), bilateral pleural effusions (fluid in the lungs), and exacerbated (make worse) his congestive heart failure. 2. Resident 1 had sudden new onset of 7/10 pain (severe pain) with as needed (PRN) pain medication given for first time on 8/18/24 and 8/19/24. This resulted in increased pain and discomfort. Findings: A review of facility's policy titled, Change in Condition Policy Assessment, revised on 9/17/17, indicated residents who experience a change of condition will be assessed promptly and follow up action will be taken as indicated in a timely manner. This includes any sudden and/or marked adverse change in signs, symptoms, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff had the skills and competencies to ensure the medical needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) were met when significant changes of condition were not identified and reported to the physician. This resulted Resident 1 to be transferred to the hospital for fluid overload, ascites (fluid in abdomen), anasarca (fluid throughout all of body, puffy body), bilateral pleural effusions (fluid in the lungs), and exacerbated (make worse) congestive heart failure. Findings: A review of Resident 1's record indicated he was admitted into this facility on 7/4/24 to rehabilitate from a hip replacement. Resident had Parkinson's Disease (movement disorder of the nervous system), high blood pressure, and heart failure Resident 1 was his own health care decision maker. During a record review of acute care hospital discharge notes for 7/4/2024, Resident 1 had +1 (mild) pitting (when one presses on the site, there is a pit or indentation) edema to right lower extremity and +2 (moderate) pitting to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, this requirement was not met when the facility failed to be free of significant medication errors when a necessary heart medication was not provided to one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) after it was ordered by a physician. This had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk of heart failure, further hospitalization, or death. Findings Resident 1 was admitted to the facility after being hospitalized for pneumonia, and severe peripheral artery disease following a history of heart surgery. During his hospitalization, he was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (Afib, a heart condition that causes the heart chambers to be chaotically and out of rhythm, dysrhythmia) and he was prescribed digoxin, an important medicine to correct this dysrhythmia, to be continued by the long-term care facility. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 11/24/17, indicated that licensed nurses must administer medications in accordance with physician orders. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and nursing schedule review, the facility failed to ensure that there was a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty 8 hours per day/ 7 days a week. This failure had the potential to adversely affect oversight and direction regarding resident's quality of care and quality of life directly impacting overall health and well-being. Findings: A review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, an electronic system for facilities to submit staffing information), for Fiscal Year Quarter 3: (April - June 2023), indicated the facility had no RN on duty for: 4/29/23 Saturday (Sa), 5/20/23 (Sa), 5/27/23 (Sa), 6/3/23 (Sa), 6/4/23 Sunday (Su), 6/10/23 (Sa), 6/11/23 (Su), 6/12/23 Monday (M), 6/13/23 Tuesday (T), 6/14/23 Wednesday (W), 6/15/23 Thursday (Th), 6/17/23 (Sa), 6/18/23 (Su), 6/24/23 (Sa), 6/25/23 (Su) During a review of the RN monthly schedule, dated April, May, and June 2023, indicated there was no RN coverage for Saturdays or Sundays during the month of June. During an interview on 10/18/23 at 2:30 pm, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed, We have had just a few shifts…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report a failed water heater to state and local agencies for 12 days. This failure had the potential to place all residents at risk for exposure to germs and illness related to a lack of hot water. Findings: A facility policy, titled, Unusual Occurrences, reviewed 4/30/22, was reviewed. The policy indicated a list of unusual occurrences that should have been reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 24 hours by telephone and confirmed in writing. Among the reportable occurrences was any that, constituted an interference with facility operations, or which threatened the welfare, safety or health of residents, personnel, or visitors. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/17/23, at 11:30 AM, in the facility laundry room, Housekeeper (HSK) A stated the hot water had been off for one and a half weeks. HSK A confirmed a temperature log for the month of October 2023 contained a last recorded water temperature of 151 degrees Fahrenheit on 10/5/23 at 4:30 AM. No further temperatures had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, observations and record review the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe working order when: 1. The temperature of the nourishment refrigerator located in nursing station one was above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (° F, a unit of measuring temperature). 2. The manufacturer guidelines were not followed for cleaning and sanitizing the ice machine. 3. A walk-in freezer located in the large storeroom in the basement had ice build-up on the inside of the door, around the fans and around a pipe. These failures had the potential for the equipment to not be maintained to ensure proper functioning. Findings: During a review of facility's policy and procedure titled Maintenance Shop dated 2023, it indicated it was the policy to maintain a Maintenance Log of service visits, repairs and inspections of the facility's fixtures, equipment, systems and buildings. 1. According to the US Food and Drug Administration titled Keep your appliances at the proper temperatures dated 1/18/23. Keep the refrigerator temperature at or below 40° F or 4° Celcius (C,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $932K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA