Sequim Bay Post Acute
650 West Hemlock St, Sequim, WA 98382 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (360) 582-2400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,185 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.7% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 12.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.2% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.7% | 15.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.4% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.0% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 297 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 182 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.4%CMS range 54.3–66.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.9–11.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 4.2–9.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 88.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: ensure their infection control and preventions practices were implemented to prevent the transmission of a highly transmissible disease Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB, a bacteria resistant to nearly all antibiotics and difficult to remove from the environment, a multi-drug resistant organism [MDRO]); prevent the spread of CRAB within the facility for 6 of 6 sampled residents (61, 41, 42, 70, 37 & 39) reviewed for infection control prevention; utilize the proper types of disinfectant wipes against the Carbapenem-Resistant Organism (CRO); follow and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP is a type of isolation for identified high risk residents to prevent the spread of disease from one person to another) for 15 of 65 facility residents (17, 5, 30, 53, 54, 35, 26, 16, 13, 102, 121, 108, 105, 110 & 124) reviewed for infection prevention and control; keep dispensers filled with alcohol rub or hand sanitizer in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure offloading interventions were implemented consistently to prevent the development and worsening of pressure injuries (also known as pressure ulcers, that occur when soft tissues are compressed between bony prominences and external services) and that wound care was provided consistently as ordered to promote wound healing for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed for pressure injuries. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed a stage 2 (partial thickness loss of skin with expose dermal tissue) pressure injury on their right heel worsened to an unstageable (full thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure injury wound that became infected requiring antibiotic treatment. This failure placed residents at risk for pressure wound development, delayed wound healing and a decreased quality of life. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of significant changes related to the development of a Stage 2 pressure injury (develop when soft tissue is compressed between a bony prominence and an external surface for a prolonged period causing partial-thickness skin loss affecting the epidermis and dermis, but do not expose fat or deeper tissues) for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of changes. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being able to participate in resident care decisions, delayed medical treatment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Change in Condition and Notification Policy, dated 06/01/2025, showed the facility would make notifications regarding the resident's condition, to the resident and resident representative based on the resident's clinical status, decision making capacity and preference. Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to include pressure prevention strategies for a newly admitted resident who was at risk for pressure injury (also known as pressure ulcers, bedsores, or decubitus ulcers, occur when soft tissues are compressed between bony prominences and external surfaces) and failed to consistently implement interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning. This failure places residents at risk of unmet care needs, development of pressure injuries, and decreased quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Planning Policy, dated 06/01/2025 showed the facility would develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident based on needs and clinical condition. The care plan would be developed upon admission and based on clinical assessment, .and identified risk. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for aftercare following a hip fracture and diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow up on reports of lost items for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for grievances. This failure places all residents at risk of unmet needs, a diminished quality of life, and potential financial burden. Findings included .Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], The admission Minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/08/2025, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for ADLs, medically complex and required the use of corrective lenses. Review of the Resident's Demographics page which included a photo, showed the resident wearing eyeglasses. The care plan focus for Activities, initiated on 10/09/2025 documented the resident wore glasses. The resident discharged from the facility on 12/29/2025. On 02/11/2026 at 10:11 am, CC 1, resident's caregiver, said they reported the resident's glasses missing to facility staff on multiple occasions. The initial occasion was earlier in December,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly update and consistently implement care planned interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning) to maintain the resident's ability and function in preparation for discharge home. This failure places residents at risk of unmet care needs, decreased quality of life, and decline in functional ability. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], The admission Minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/08/2025, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for ADLs, medically complex, had no previous use of a mechanical lift ( a machine used to transfer/assist non weight bearing person from bed to chair or other surfaces), and no refusals of care. The resident discharged the facility on 12/29/2025. Review of Resident 1's Care plan, initiated 10/07/2026, included goals the resident would improve current level of function including transfers and included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' records were complete, accurate, and/or accessible, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. Failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records, that are accessible to staff, placed residents at risk for delayed resources, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .An intake, dated 09/04/2025 at 2:31pm, showed that Resident 1 did not receive their Social Security benefits and that Resident 1 had reached out to the facility, to address the reason for cessation of Social Security payments (due to incorrectly being identified as still residing there) but had not received assistance from the facility to correct the issue.During an interview on 09/10/2025 at 1:48 pm, Resident 1 said they admitted to the facility on [DATE]th or 30th of 2024 and discharged on April 30th, 2025. Resident 1 said they had received a letter in August that said Resident 1 would not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure at least eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage was provided daily, for 3 of 31 days reviewed (07/27/2025, 08/03/2025 & 08/17/2025) for RN coverage. This failure placed residents at risk for delay in resident assessments, identification of changes in condition, and provision of nursing care and services requiring a RN.Findings included . Review of the Staffing Pattern document completed by Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), for the 31-day period from 07/19/2025 - 08/18/2025, showed on 07/27/2025, 08/03/2025 and 08/17/2025 no RN coverage was provided. On 08/21/2025 at 2:50 PM, Staff B, DNS, confirmed no RN coverage was provided on the above-referenced dates and said the facility had difficulties finding RN coverage on some weekends, primarily for Sundays. Reference WAC 388-97-1080 (3)(a).
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were reviewed to ensure they accurately reflected residents' mental health diagnoses and/or selected the requirement for Level 2 PASRR referrals to be made, for 6 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 29, 1, 17, 58, 6, & 8) reviewed for PASRRs. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving timely and necessary mental health services, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.1) Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of major depression disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and bipolar disorder (mental health condition with severe high and low moods). Review of Resident 29's Level 1 PASRR, dated 10/18/2020, showed it did not have depression selected on the form and did not select that a Level 2 PASRR evaluation was required. No additional Level 1 PASRRs were completed. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 1:05 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards for 6 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 15, 58, 8, 17, 6 & 5) reviewed unnecessary medication and for 2 of 2 nursing refrigerators (South Hall and North Hall) reviewed. The facility staff failed to label and date open vials and document, follow, or transcribe physician orders when indicated. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Non-Pharmacological Interventions 1) Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated [DATE], documented Resident 15 was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated [DATE], documented Resident 15 was to have 5 milligrams (mg) of oxycodone (an opioid) every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for pain. The order was discontinued on [DATE]. Review of the [DATE] Medication Administration Record (MAR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and their person-centered plan of care, for 5 of 8 residents (Resident 58, 8, 17, 15, &5) reviewed for bowel management, and 1 of 2 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The failure to ensure the provision of bowel care was in accordance with physicians' orders and/or the facility bowel protocol, and that pressure redistribution devices functioned properly, placed residents at risk for delays in treatment, skin breakdown, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Bowel Management Review of facility's policy titled, Management of Constipation dated 11/2023, documented When a resident is identified with No/small Bowel Movement [BM] documented for 64hrs, the LN [Licensed Nurse] will assess the resident and determine if the bowel protocol will be initiated. Standard bowel protocol to relieve constipation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive resident centered care plans for 3 of 20 residents (Residents 45, 70, & 17) reviewed for care planning, and to ensure care conferences occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 15) for care conferences. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included .Care Plans 1) Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 06/16/2025, documented the resident had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty or inability to swallow) and was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident 45 required set up or clean-up assistance with eating and was on a mechanically altered diet. On 08/20/2025 at 7:46 AM, Resident 45 was observed in the dining room eating breakfast and being assisted by staff. A review of Resident 45's electronic health record (EHR), showed a diet order of: Regular diet Easy to Chew…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assist with scheduling and/or coordinating notary public services (a public officer whose function it is to administer oaths; to attest and certify, by their hand and official seal, certain classes of documents, in order to give them credit and authenticity) for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 7 & 70) reviewed for advanced directives (written instruction for the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care) who required notarization. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their identified healthcare decisions and preferences honored.Findings included .1) Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 08/12/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact. A Social Services note, dated 08/30/2023, documented Resident 7 had completed an Advanced Directive form, and the Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received timely specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for therapy services (Resident 45). This failure to complete a Speech Therapy evaluation and provide services, placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 06/16/2025, documented the resident had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty or inability to swallow) and was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident 45 required set up or clean-up assistance with eating and was on a mechanically altered diet. On 08/20/2025 at 7:46 AM Resident 45 was observed in the dining room eating breakfast and being assisted by staff.A review of Resident 45's electronic health record showed 2 orders dated 06/10/2025: -Speech Therapy to evaluate and treat-Regular diet easy to chew…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the state agency and/or log allegations of abuse/mistreatment by staff on the reporting log within five working days for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for repeated incidents, unmet care needs and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 showed on page 7 that the facility should report via telephone and via the reporting log any act where there is reasonable cause to believe the act caused fear of imminent harm. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Prevention and Reporting: Resident mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse ., showed that facility staff were to report to the Director of Nursing or Executive Director any allegation of abuse, neglect or mistreatment, who would then immediately report to the state agency. All alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment would be reported within 2 hours of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine cleaning services to support a clean and homelike environment for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for clean, homelike environment. This failure placed residents at risk for a less than homelike environment, diminished quality of life and potential infection control issues. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Healthcare Cleaning Policy, showed the purpose was to maintain cleanliness in the healthcare setting and included that floors, furniture, and bathrooms should be free from visible streaks or stains and that high touch surfaces would be cleaned and disinfected with hospital grade disinfectant. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/27/2024, documented Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required substantial to maximal assistance from staff for completion of activities of daily living (ADLs) On 08/28/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services as evidenced by information provided in Resident/Surveyor interviews for 6 residents (Residents 67, 55, 11, 24, 65 and 2) interviewed, and 6 staff (Staff B, J, H, M, N & 1 anonymous staff) interviewed. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with Activities of Daily Living and restorative services. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, decreased physical abilities and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 06/13/2024, documented Resident 67 had severe cognitive impairment, was medically complex and dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The care plan, initiated on 06/06/2024, showed Resident 67 required two person assist with mechanical lift for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Care Conferences (a conference where staff and residents/families talk about life in the facility, review the progress of each patient and make adjustments, as needed, to their care), for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 13, 17, 23, 28, and 44) reviewed for provision of care conferences, and failed to ensure care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 3 of 31 sample residents (Residents 68, 69 and 31) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. These failures placed residents at risk of not feeling involved in the development of their plan of care, unmet needs, decreased quality of care and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Care Conferences> <Resident 13> Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney failure (damaged kidneys that cannot filter the blood the way it should) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent restorative services were provided for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 17, 23, 28, and 65) reviewed for range of motion (ROM) and mobility. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 65> Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain cells depriving them of vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/01/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact and was dependent to needing partial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The care plan, initiated 01/23/2024, included restorative program interventions initiated on 05/02/2024 for transfers related to self-care performance deficit and the care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Intravenous (IV) services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 69 & 31) reviewed for IV therapy. The facility failed to provide Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) care, maintenance and monitoring to include changing needleless injection caps, flushes, dressing changes, monitoring the external length to verify the line had not migrated, and monitoring insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection. These failures placed the resident at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change, Needleless Connector Change, and Flushing and Locking policies, all revised 06/…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 28, 50, 67 & 2) with mechanical soft or puree diets, whose meals were observed during tray line. Failure to provide accurate portion sizes, placed residents at risk of unmet nutritional needs, and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's menu showed for lunch on 08/12/2024 smothered chicken, parslied rice, brussels sprouts and a dinner roll would be served. >Portion Sizes< Review of the menu showed residents on D1 pureed diets would receive: A #8 (4-5 ounces) scoop of pureed chicken. A #12 (2.5-3 ounces) scoop of pureed brussels sprouts. A # 16 (2-2.5 ounces) scoop of pureed dinner roll D2 mechanical soft diets would receive: A #12 (2.5-3 ounces) scoop of pureed brussels sprouts. Observation of the steam table on 08/12/2024 at 11:20 AM showed the pureed chicken, pureed brussels sprouts, and pureed dinner roll had a #8 scoops in them for serving. Observation of tray line from 10:49 AM - 11:20 AM, showed dietary staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve foods in a manner that conserved nutritive value, palatability and that ensured meals served were appetizing and at the proper temperature for 5 of 8 (Residents 17, 23, 28, 32, and 8) sampled residents reviewed for dining and 2 of 2 residents (Residents 2 and 57) on pureed diets.The failure to ensure meals were served at appropriate temperatures, with a good presentation, and that were palatable, placed residents at risk for decreased satisfaction with meals, poor intake, weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Observation> On 08/05/2024 at 11:45 AM, a cart with five meal trays was brought out of the kitchen and placed in the assisted dining room. At 12:02 PM, Staff K, Nursing Assistant (NA), said the cart was for residents for the north hall. At 12:08 PM, Staff N, NA, said the cart was for south hall residents who were supposed to eat in the dining room. At 12:11 PM, Staff were observed removing the cart (which had sat without plate warmers for 23 minutes) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or their legal representative, in advance, of the risks and benefits associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) and obtain informed consent prior to administering the medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 77) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures prevented residents and/or legal representatives from making informed decisions about the use of multiple antidepressant medications, and precluded them from exercising their right to refuse/decline the proposed medications. Findings included . Resident 77 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 07/28/2024, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, a diagnosis of depressive disorder and received antidepressant medication. Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 77 had orders, dated 07/21/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place which ensured the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocacy group for residents in a nursing homes) received required resident discharge information for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 43 & 31) reviewed for hospitalization. These failures placed residents at risk for being inappropriately discharged , not understanding their rights, and prevented the Ombudsman from having the opportunity to educate and advocate for residents during the discharge process. Findings included . 1) Resident 43's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/30/2024, showed the resident had an unplanned transfer to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with return anticipated. Review of Resident 43's electronic health record (EHR) showed there was no documentation present showing the State Ombudsman Office was provided a written notice detailing the reasons for transfer as required. On 08/12/2024 at 3:24 PM, Staff D, Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents/resident's representatives bed hold notices at the time of transfer, or within 24 hours of an emergent transfer for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 43) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Resident 43 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/30/2024, showed the resident had an unplanned transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident 43's electronic health record (EHR) showed there was no documentation present to show the resident, or their representative were provided a bed hold notice upon transfer as required. On 08/12/2024 at 3:39 PM, when asked if there was documentation to show Resident 43 or their representative were provided a written bed hold notice at the time of transfer, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 28 sampled residents (Residents 69 & 43) whose Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were reviewed. Failure to accurately identify active diagnoses, the presence and type of intravenous access, the administration of IV medications, and to assess a resident's cognitive patterns, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 69> Resident 69 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) to right upper arm and orders for ceftriaxone (an antibiotic) intravenously (IV) daily for a bone and bone marrow infection (osteomyelitis), with direction to infuse via valved single lumen PICC, and an order for vancomycin (antibiotic) IV daily for osteomyelitis Resident 69's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 69 was administered the IV Vancomycin and the IV ceftriaxone on 07/18/2024. Review of the 07/18/2024 5-day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 28 sample residents (Residents 132, 69 & 43) reviewed for professional standards. The failure to follow and/or clarify incomplete physician's orders, and to only sign for tasks that were completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors, unidentified and/or delayed treatment of complications related to intravenous (IV) therapy, and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 132 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with orders to use a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP, a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) at night. The CPAP orders included: apply CPAP at bedtime, CPAP settings per resident's home settings; and wash CPAP mask and tubing with soap and water daily and let air dry. On 08/05/2024 at 3:42 PM, when asked what their home CPAP settings were, Resident 132 said they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enteral nutrition (the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach or small intestine) was administered in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 43) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to accurately record the amount of enteral formula and water flushes administered, to identify and clarify incomplete enteral orders to include route of administration (e.g., gastric tube), method of delivery (gravity, via pump etc.) and the time the enteral formula infusion was to start and finish. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving inadequate nutrition, hydration, weight loss and other potential adverse health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Enteral Tubes policy, revised 12/23/2023, showed 60 ml piston syringes and open system top fill feeding bags, should be replaced every 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff compliance with current infection control guidelines and standards of practice for donning (putting on) of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 40), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of illness), transmission of diseases and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy and Procedure, dated 08/2023, showed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs [Multidrug-resistant Organisms] to staff hands and clothing. Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for EBP include: o Dressing o Bathing/showering o Transferring o Providing hygiene o Changing linens o Changing briefs or assisting with toileting o Device care or use: central line,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a resident grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving a grievance resolution, a denial of personal rights and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy entitled, Grievances, revised 02/2024, documented staff were to receive the grievance form or help the resident fill one out, and immediately turn the form into the executive director or director of nursing, The grievance was to be discussed at the morning stand up meeting and logged into the electronic system for tracking. The grievance should be addressed within five days and the resident should be followed up with to ascertain satisfaction. The facility should provide a written resolution to the resident/representative if requested. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 04/04/2024, documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to act timely on a physician order referring the resident for additional diagnostic testing and a spine specialist. This failure placed residents at risk for health complications, prolonged pain, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of spondylosis (a painful condition of the spine resulting from the degeneration of the intervertebral disks) of the lumbar region and low back pain. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 01/04/2024, documented Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required staff assistance for activities of daily living. The care plan, initiated 12/19/2023, documented Resident 1 had potential for acute and chronic pain related to chronic physical disability and chronic back pain. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility implemented an external urinary catheter system without assessing for appropriateness, training staff in the use of the device, care planning the system and failed to ensure adequate hydration. These failures placed residents at risk for infection, dehydration, and medical complications. Findings included . Review of the external female catheter system package insert showed the catheter should only remain in place for eight to 12 hours and should not be used if there is bowel incontinence. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/23/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact, medically complex, required substantial/maximum staff assistance for toileting, did not have an internal or external catheter, was frequently incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to reflect current care needs for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, decline in function, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Care Planning Process, revised on 05/19/2023, documented the care plan should describe services and interventions to allow the resident to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing, should re-evaluate the resident's status and when significant changes in status occurs, should then modify the care plan as appropriate and necessary. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including Rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder that can affect the joints, resulting in bone erosion and joint deformity) (RA). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of exercise to prevent a decline in range of motion for 1 of 4 residents (Residents 1) reviewed for restorative services. Failure to provide consistent services placed residents at risk of deconditioning, loss of range of motion, inability to complete activities of daily living (ADL), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing, revised on 12/2022, documented the restorative program functions to enable residents to maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning and promotes a positive quality of life for residents and prevention of functional decline. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis including Rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder that can affect the joints, resulting in bone erosion and joint deformity) (RA). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs), including showering/bathing were provided for dependent residents for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 & 3) reviewed for ADL care. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed for which they were unable to perform themselves and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Personal Needs, revised on 12/20/2022, documented resident care plans would address the individual care needs and preferences of the resident and personal care and ADL support would be provided according to the residents' care plan. 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/20/2023, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and displayed no behaviors that interfered with care. The care plan intervention for bathing, initiated on 04/11/2018 and revised on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least eight hours of Registered Nurse (RN) supervision for 3 of 30 sampled days (07/15/2023, 07/16/2023 and 07/22/2023) reviewed for RN coverage. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving needed care and supervision of care being provided. Findings included . The Aging and Long-Term Support Administration (ALTSA) Staffing Pattern, and the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Forms for the 30 day look back period, showed the facility did not have any RNs on duty on 07/15/2023, 07/16/2023 and 07/22/2023. On 07/27/2023 at 1:58 PM, Staff S, Staffing Coordinator, said they did not normally have an RN working on the weekends. Reference WAC 388-97-1080 (3) .
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a dignified manner for 4 of 4 sampled residents (17, 54, 5 & 4) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed residents at risk for not being groomed in their normal manner, not having privacy during personal care and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/16/2023, showed Resident 17 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). On 07/23/2023 at 3:07 PM, Resident 17's wheel chair was observed to be covered with debris. Food was over every surface and extensively over all parts visible on the wheel chair. On 07/25/2023 at 9:41 AM, Resident 17 was observed to have brown dried material on his face and bridge of nose. Resident 17 was out in the hallways and lobby. At 12:34 PM, Staff H, Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment had acceptable levels of noise and prevent excessive odors for 2 of 4 halls (North side halls & 200 and 300 halls) and 1 of 1 sampled residents (54) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed residents at risk of stress, unpleasant odors and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 54 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/04/2023, documented resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with transferring, toileting and personal hygiene. <Noise Levels> On 07/23/2023 at 11:00 AM, the call bell alarm at the North Nurses' Station was observed alarming for approximately 30 minutes. The alarm indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] lamp fault. At 11:02 AM, Resident 54 was observed in the TV room in the 300 hall and could be heard repeatedly yelling Help, Help Me at the North Nurses' Station and down both 200…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medication storage areas (South) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving wrong or ineffective medications and treatments. Findings included . On 07/23/2023 at 3:00 PM, the South medication storage room was observed and showed refrigerator temperatures were not regularly recorded on the refrigerator temperature log. The refrigerator temperature log, dated 06/01/2023 to 06/30/2023, showed 16 missing recordings (18 of 60 opportunities) of the refrigerator temperature. The refrigerator temperature log, dated 07/01/2023 to 07/23/2023, showed 25 missing recordings (25 of 46 opportunities) of the refrigerator temperature. On 07/28/2023 at 11:40 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services and Registered Nurse, said the nurse on shift was responsible for recording the temperature twice per day. Reference WAC 388-97-1300 (2) .
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff received dementia training for 3 of 5 sampled staff (C, D & E) reviewed for staff in-service trainings. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from unskilled staff. Findings included . 1) Staff C, Nursing Assistant, was hired on 11/29/2022. The Relias (electronic learning center for staff training) transcript and the Training Log/Sign In Sheet for Staff C did not show documentation of dementia training since date of hire. 2) Staff D, Floor Tech, was hired on 02/03/2023. The Relias transcript and the Training Log/Sign In Sheet for Staff H did not show documentation of abuse/neglect and dementia training since date of hire. 3) Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse, was hired on 12/28/2022. The Relias transcript and the Training Log/Sign In Sheet for Staff E did not show documentation of dementia training since date of hire. On 07/27/2023 at 8:58 AM, Staff A, Administrator, said they did not do dementia trainings. Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(b) .
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure procedures were in place to assist residents with completing advance directives (AD), and obtaining and maintaining Durable Power of Attorney documentation for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 22 & 31) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . 1) Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 05/16/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 22's electronic health record (EHR) did not show an AD or documentation of a discussion or education regarding ADs. 2) Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 31's EHR did not show an AD or documentation of a discussion or education regarding ADs. On 07/25/2023 at 2:35 PM, Staff Z, Social Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and treatments were being administered per provider orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 53) reviewed for services meet professional standards. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, substandard quality of care and unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/19/2023, showed Resident 53 was moderately cognitively impaired and was able to answer yes/no questions. Record review of Resident 53's April 2023, May 2023, June 2023 and July 2023 Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) showed the following instances of medications and/or treatments were not documented as administered over a four month period, 04/01/2023 to 07/27/2023: --Weight weekly every day shift, every Monday was not administered 5 times, on 05/29/2023, 06/05/2023, 06/19/2023, 07/03/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident communication devices were available for 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident 53) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed residents at risk of not being able to adequately express themselves and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke with difficult verbal expression/communication. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/19/2022, showed Resident 53 was moderately cognitively impaired and was able to answer yes/no questions. The Care Plan, dated 01/17/2022, showed an alteration in sensory/communication related to speech disturbance due to expressive aphasia (difficulty expressing self). The care plan, revised 06/08/2022, showed Resident 53 needs communication devices in order to more adequately express himself and needs to be able to express himself and make his needs known. The care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents eating assistance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 5) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents. This failure placed residents at risk of choking, weight loss and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/12/2023, showed Resident 5 required extensive assistance with ADLs and supervision for dining including queuing and redirection. The [NAME] (care instructions for staff), undated, showed Resident 5 required assistance of one staff person to eat, and documented, Resident to go to DR [dining room] for all meals for supervision and assistance; Encourage to go to dining room for all meals; Monitor and record food intake at each meal; Needs time to adjust to changes in diet and circumstances. Encourage to eat; Praise progress or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was an activity program to meet individual resident needs for 1 of 4 sampled residents (53) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for becoming bored and depressed when not provided meaningful engagement throughout the day, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/19/2023, showed Resident 53 was moderately cognitively impaired and was able to answer yes/no questions. Resident 53's care plan, dated 06/06/2023, showed Resident 53 was dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation, social interaction and Resident 53 would attend one sensory group per week, . [and] participate in one 1:1 per week-going outside, listening to music, and watching movies/television. The care plan showed Resident 53 preferred activities including going outside, watching movies, listening to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments (neuros, assesses the nervous system and identified any abnormalities affecting function and activities of daily living) were performed after an unwitnessed fall and failed to ensure residents received necessary care and services with positioning based on comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 5 sampled residents (40 & 16) reviewed for quality of care related to accidents and positioning. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified injuries, health complications, worsening conditions, a delay in treatment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Neuros> Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The incident investigation report, dated 04/20/2023 at 7:45 PM, documented, resident was noted to be on floor by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant]. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure injury (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) development was prevented and promoted wound healing by implementing and following care interventions and physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for pressure injuries. This failure placed residents at risk for wound complications, infection, delayed healing, increased pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (a disease that causes high sugar in the body) and a right side below the knee amputation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/22/2023, documented the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance from 1-2 staff members for activities of daily living (toileting, transfers, mobility, dressing, etc.) and was at risk for development of pressure injuries.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure identified weight loss acted upon and interventions developed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 53) reviewed for nutrition. This caused harm to Resident 53 when the resident experienced a significant weight loss of greater than 5% body weight within a 30-day period and the identified weight loss was not addressed. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, inadequate nutrition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/19/2023, showed Resident 53 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 53's Self-Care care plan, revised 09/20/2021 and 06/20/2023, showed Resident 53 had left sided hemiparesis (muscle weakness or paralysis to one side of the body) and the resident's needs would be anticipated by staff 100% of the time. The care plan documented the resident required nutrition through a feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-07-31 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were accurately posted and updated each shift for 7 of 14 sampled days (07/11/2023, 07/12/2023, 07/18/2023 to 07/21/2023, and 07/23/2023) reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census. Findings included . The nurse staff postings, dated 07/09/2023 to 07/23/2023, documented incorrect numbers for registered (RN) and licensed nurses (LPN) and nurse aides (NA) providing care for residents on the following days and shifts: --On 07/11/2023, the posting showed eight NAs for the day shift; however, the shift had seven. The posting showed seven NAs for the evening shift; however, the shift had six. --On 07/12/2023, the posting showed three LPNs for the evening shift; however, the shift had two. --On 07/18/2023, the posting showed three LPNs for the evening shift; however, the shift had 2.5. --On 07/19/2023, 07/20/2023 and 07/21/2023; the posting showed three LPNs for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,185 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,185 — penalty dated 2026-04-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2025 |
| CLAWSON, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 44% | since 06/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMS, RYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 44% | since 06/01/2025 |
| DEANGELO, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| HICKCOX, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $540K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.