No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley Skilled Nursing Center

515 East Orangeburg Avenue, Modesto, CA 95350 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (209) 529-0516 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 529-0516 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 E Orangeburg Ave · (209) 578-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1700 McHenry Ave · (209) 529-4813 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
229 E Coolidge Ave · (209) 522-4797 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sutter Park, 801 E Orangeburg Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
225 E Orangeburg Ave · (209) 577-5035

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.9%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.0%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.242.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.961.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 320 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.69U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.4%CMS range 41.0–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 9.7–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 5.3–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
19.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 52.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-14)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely review and revise residents' comprehensive, person centered care plans after significant changes in condition and or behavior following a resident to resident aggression on 02/20/2026 and 02/21/2026 when: Three of four sampled residents ((Res) 1, Res 3, and Res 4), did not have care plan updates documented in accordance with the facility policy. 2. Two of four sampled residents (Res 1 and Res 2), had no interdisciplinary team (IDT - a collaborative group of professionals including nurses, doctors, therapists, social workers, and dietitians who meet regularly to plan and manage a resident's care) documentation after the significant incident on 2/20/26. 3. One of four sampled residents (Res 2), had lack of documented follow up on room change and safety measures after being followed by social services.These failures to timely reassess, implement interventions, and revise care plans placed Res 1, Res 2, Res 3, and Res 4 at risk for psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered with adequate clinical indication and clear parameters for one of four sampled residents (Resident (Res) 1), when Res 1 had two active as needed medication orders for the same medication with different dosages and the same administration criteria, which required nurses to select the dose based on their personal judgment rather than physician directed parameters.This failure had the potential to result in over medication or undermedication of Res 1 and placed Res 1, an already vulnerable patient in a nursing home at risk of receiving an unnecessary medication dose.Findings:During a review of Res 1's [Physician (MD)/ Nurse Practitioners(NP)] Progress note, dated 3/4/26, the MD/NP Progress note indicated Res 1 was a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization. The MD/NP Progress note indicated Res 1 had a significant past medical history of high blood pressure (force of blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3), when:1. Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on [DATE] and there was no care plan following a left hip fracture.This failure had the potential to result in delayed detection of post-operative complications such as pain, infection and immobility to Resident 1's left hip following surgery.2. Resident 2 had an unwitnessed fall on [DATE] and the neuro check (a focused neurological evaluation used to monitor changes in a patient's functional status such as blood pressure, temperature, pulse, respiration, right pupil [the black, circular opening in the center of the eye that regulates the amount of light] size, left pupil size, right hand grip, and left hand grip) was not completed according to Resident 2's care plan and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) had the right to retain and use personal possessions when Resident 1 reported a missing pair of shoes and a hinged knee brace on 5/23/25 and staff did not follow facility policy to investigate and offer to replace or reimburse the missing items. This failure resulted in the loss of Resident 1 ' s pair of shoes and hinged knee brace without being replaced or reimbursed for the value of the items. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history), dated 6/13/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses which included .TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS [a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing] .UNSTEADINESS ON FEET .ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION [high blood pressure] .DIFFICULTY IN WALKING . During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 5/23/25, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and secure protected health information (PHI) for residents and private information for staff when two of seven sheds (a simple roofed structure used as storage space) were broken into on 4/29/25 and was not secured until 5/6/25. This failure had the potential to result in loss, destruction, or unauthorized use of resident PHI and staff private information. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/25 at 9:58 a.m. with the Environmental Service Director (ESD) outside behind the facility, two of seven sheds approximately 10 feet x 15 feet made of wood did not have locks and one shed did not have a door. The door to the first shed was missing and wide open with one 8 feet x 10 feet board made of wood standing at a 45 degree angle in front of the shed. The ESD stated the board was used to cover the entrance. Inside the first shed were two four feet high standard filing cabinets (specialized storage unit designed to organize and secure records, charts, and other sensitive information)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to meet the needs of one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when nursing staff did not administer lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety [mental condition which causes intense and persistent worry]) at the specified time frame according to the physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive his medication earlier than the prescribed time and had the potential to cause respiratory depression (characterized by slow and ineffective breathing), drowsiness (tiredness), change in consciousness (how alert and awake someone is), dry mouth, loss of appetite, memory impairment, trouble sleeping, abnormal movements of the body, constipation, and weakness. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history) , dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included .TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS [DM- a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's dose of lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety [mental condition which causes intense and persistent worry])was not documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on [DATE] and the complete record of the medication error was not documented in an incident report and Resident 1's clinical record. This failure had the potential to affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 1 and the potential to cause errors in medical treatment and plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history) , dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included .TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS [DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) and state regulations, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had a lump to the right shoulder, lump to the right side of the chest with bruising due to an unknown cause and it was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, a government agency for the State of California in charge of protecting the public's health and helping shape positive health outcomes for individuals, families and communities) and the ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) within 2 hours as required by law. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of the injury of unknown origin and placed Resident 1 at risk for physical harm and delayed care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history) , dated 3/27/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a newly developed lump to the right shoulder and a lump to the right side of the chest with bruising and the care plan did not include thorough and individualized objectives, timeframes, goals, and interventions. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for complications and delayed healing to her right shoulder and chest. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history) , dated 3/27/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included .TRANSIENT CEREBRAL ISCHEMIA ATTACK [TIA- a temporary lack of blood flow to the brain] .ESSENTIAL (PRIMARY) HYPERTENSION [high blood pressure] .MUSCLE WEAKNESS .NEED FOR ASSISTANCE WITH PERSONAL CARE . During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) , dated 12/2/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen according to physician orders for 3 (Residents #6, #24, and #111) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, revealed, Preparation included, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #111 on 01/22/2025 and most recently on 03/04/2025. According to the admission Record, Resident #111 had a medical history that included diagnoses of hemiplegia (total or nearly complete inability to use one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (onset date 01/22/2025), unspecified heart failure, unspecified anemia, and morbid obesity. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) were provided for 2 (Resident #111 and Resident #24) of 7 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions and failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices observed during medication administration for 1 (Resident #46) of 6 residents during medication administration and 1 (Resident #111) of 1 resident during wound care. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 08/2022, revealed Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-frug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. The policy revealed, 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. The policy revealed, 3. Exampled of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include: a. dressing; b. bathing/showering; c. transferring; d. providing hygiene; e. changing linens; f.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect Resident #44's right to be free from physical abuse perpetrated by another resident (Resident #259). This deficient practice affected 1 (Resident #44) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 04/2021, revealed, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #44 on 10/01/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of depression, major depressive disorder with severe psychotic symptoms, and legal blindness. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) accurately reflected the presence of a diagnosed serious mental illness for 1 (Resident #35) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASARR requirements. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35's initial PASARR reflected that the resident had a diagnosis of depression. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, revised 12/2016, indicated, The objective of the PASARR policy is to ensure that individuals with mental illness and intellectual disabilities receive the care and services that they need in the most appropriate setting. An admission Record indicated admitted Resident #35 on 11/30/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of depression (onset date 11/30/2024). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/2024, revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted a dependent resident with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #7. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised 03/2018, indicated, Residents will [sic] provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. An admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #7 on 02/02/2022 and most recently admitted the resident on 10/01/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of quadriplegia (loss of function in all four limbs), hemiplegia (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care per the facility's policy and accepted infection control standards and failed to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter bag below the level of the bladder for 1 (Resident #111) of 3 residents reviewed with an indwelling urinary catheter. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised 08/2022, revealed the section titled Maintaining Unobstructed Urine Flow, included, 3. Position the drainage bag lower than the bladder at all times to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder. The policy revealed the section titled Steps in the Procedure Routine Perineal Hygiene, included, c. Change the position of the washcloth (or wipe) with each cleansing stroke. d. With a clean washcloth (or wipe), rinse using the above technique. Further review revealed, 15. Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap (or bathing wipe) to cleanse and rinse the catheter from insertion site to approximately four inches outward. An admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident allergies and preferences for 2 (Resident #257 and Resident #41) of 3 residents sampled for food. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Food Allergies, dated 2023, revealed, Policy: Residents with food allergies will be identified upon admission. The policy also indicated, Procedure: 1. Allergies will be noted in the medical record. 2. All allergies will be communicated in writing directly to the FNS [Food and Nutrition Services] Director by Nursing. 3. Appropriate food substitutions will be offered for foods the resident cannot eat. 4. Refer to [Vendor Name] Diet Manual for food allergy information. 5. Allergies will be noted on the tray card, the resident diet profile, and posted in the kitchen and nursing station, if necessary. A facility policy titled, Food Preferences, dated 2023, revealed, Policy: Resident's food preferences will be adhered to within reason. Substitutes for all foods disliked will be given from the appropriate food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Psychotropic Medication Use,regarding the safe and appropriate prescribing and administering of psychotropic (used to treat psychosis- conditions that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) medication for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Divalproex sodium (medication used to treat seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness] and mental disorders and to prevent migraine headaches) was prescribed and administered prior to determining the appropriate indication for use. This failure increased Resident 1 ' s risk of serious side effects that included but were not limited to nausea, vomiting, headaches, liver complications, tardive dyskinesia (condition causing uncontrolled movements various body parts like the arms and legs or of the tongue in a chewing motion) and changes to mood, behaviors and thought processes. Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when: 1. Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 7/24/24 and facility staff did not complete a change of condition (COC) assessment (used to describe situation, background, assessment of resident and physician recommendations). 2. Resident 2 had a change in urine patterns on 7/28/24, blood in urine on 7/30/24 and the facility did not complete a COC for both instances for Resident 2. These failures resulted in incomplete documentation for Resident 1 and Resident 2 putting Resident 1 at risk for falls and Resident 2 at risk for delay in care when there was no documentation of change in condition to inform other facility staff of changes in resident care. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Post Fall Evaluation (PFE), dated 7/25/24, the PFE indicated, Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 7/24/24 resulting in fracture to the olecranon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan per facility ' s policy and procedure titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 sustained a fracture (broken bone) of left arm on 7/24/24 and there was no care plan created for Resident 1 ' s care of the fractured right arm. This failure had the potential for harm when the facility staff did not create a care plan with interventions to monitor Resident 1 ' s fractured right arm with bandage that could have led to skin breakdown, pain, and acute compartment syndrome (bandage or cast placed on injured arm or leg too tightly) causing swelling, numbness, weakness, difficulty moving the affected body part. Findings: During an observation on 8/13/24 at 11:22 a.m. of Resident 1 in Resident 1 ' s room. Resident 1 was observed walking around facility with four wheeled walker. Resident 1 was observed to have an arm brace…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) followed professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when on 9/30/23 at 6:30 a.m., Resident 2's blood glucose (sugar) level was of 55 mg/dl [milligrams per deciliter [a unit of measurement]) and LVN did not communicate the result to Resident 2's physician and did not recheck Resident 2's blood glucose within 15 minutes as per the facility's Hypoglycemia (low blood glucose) policy. This failure increased the potential for Resident 2 to experience complications such as confusion, coma (a state of deep unconsciousness that lasts for a prolonged or indefinite period), headache and restlessness. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s Face Sheet (FS- a document containing resident profile information), dated 10/17/23, the FS indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (body cannot properly use insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection control and prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable (contagious) diseases and infections when staff did not disinfect equipment with an agent that would kill Clostridium difficile (C. diff -bacterial infection that causes life threatening diarrhea) bacteria. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of transmission of C. diff infection to all residents and staff of the facility. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/23 at 10:05 a.m. in the north hallway, Resident 1's room had a plastic compartment drawer. A germicidal [brand name} agent wipes was on top of the drawer. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 10/10/22, the order summary report indicated, .The resident must remain in his/her room. This requires that all services be brought to the resident .for isolation precaution C-diff for 13 days . During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. There was no air gap for Prep sink and dishwasher machine. 2. Torn gaskets found on both Reach-in refrigerator's doors. 3. Dust found on these areas: a) Hanger for pot, pans and utensils. b) Under Food Prep stainless steel table. c) Wall in storeroom d) Four storage shelves in storeroom e) Storeroom's doorway. f) Ventilator fans in Reach-in refrigerator. g) Walk in refrigerator insulation black pipe. h) Under stainless steel table for beverage area. i) Stainless shelves for spices. 4. Storeroom's floor found food particles; walk in refrigerator's floor had rough surface and chipped paint; floor under oven had black grime and floor in dish washing area had black grime. 5. Five serving bowls did not had smooth surface. 6. One broken tile found under hand washing sink. 7. Two food storage shelves in walk in refrigerator had brown/black, white fuzzy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's psychotropic medication (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) care plan was not individualized for each specific medication. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for complications due to care needs not being planned by licensed nurses and the interdisciplinary team to determine if interventions needed to be added, changed or completed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 7/27/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture (partial or complete break in the bone) of right lower leg, fracture of left foot, surgical aftercare, bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided met professional standards of practice for two of six sampled residents (Residents 3, and Resident 94) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not take a blood pressure (the force of your blood pushing against the walls of your arteries. Each time your heart beats, it pumps blood into the arteries. Your blood pressure is highest when your heart beats, pumping the blood. This is called systolic pressure) reading for Resident 94 with blood pressure (BP) medication administration on 7/26/23 at 9 a.m. before administering Lisinopril (medication used to treat high blood pressure). This failure had the potential to result in an unwanted decrease in Resident 94's BP which could lead to lethargy, loss of consciousness and/or death. 2. Registered Nurse (RN) 2 placed physician orders for Risperidone (a drug used to treat certain mental disorders) for indications of Bipolar Disorder (a serious mental illness that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet individual needs for 12 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 28, 30, 37, 38, and 241) when: 1. Residents 3, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 28, 30, 37, 38, and 241 did not receive Mechanical Soft diet (is a diet that contain food that is chopped into small pieces for residents who have limited chewing and swallowing ability) as indicated on physician's orders and received a regular texture dessert for lunch on 7/26/2023. 2. Resident 12 had physician order for Pureed diet (a diet with food texture of smooth like pudding or mashed potatoes that requires no chewing) but received scalloped potatoes which contained chunks of potatoes for lunch on 7/26/2023. These failures placed Residents 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 28, 30, 37, 38, and 241 on choking hazard. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/26/23 at 11:48 a.m. with Diet Aide (DA) 1, no chopped peaches were observed at the tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility did not give written notification residents and/or rps about transfer to acute hospital. Resident #3 Hospitalization 07/26/23 10:43 AM recently hospitalized , not sure why. RES admitted for COPD exacerbation, hematuria, and encephalopathy. 07/27/23 10:22 AM [NAME], RN (RR) COPD exacerbation, hematuria and encephalopathy; res was on oxygen-94% NC (I)she was no 2L but not documented. RES is her own RP so nobody was notified just the NP. OMB notification of transfer was not seen in the chart. 07/27/23 10:32 AM [NAME]-only sends the OMB notification when the res discharges from ; for hospitalizations she sends them a list at the end of the month; for the discharges she gives a copy to res/rp and send it to OMB. 07/27/23 11:41 AM [NAME], DON; when a res is transferred there is a form when res gets d/c or transfer filled out and provided to RP/RES. She doesn't know if there was a physical paper when a res is transferred, its usually a verbal notification to res/rp. a 07/27/23 02:53 PM [NAME], DON;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services for one of 25 residents (Resident 93), when the facility did not obtain medications for Resident 93 after admission to the facility on 7/25/23, and Resident 93 did not receive medications per physician's orders. This resulted in Resident 93 not receiving his medications on 7/25/223 to treat his medical conditions, and place Resident 93 at harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 93's admission Record (AR-a document with personal, identifiable and medical information), dated 7/28/23, the AR indicated, .admission Date 7/25/23 .Primary Diagnosis .Schizophrenia, Unspecified (condition that involves delusions (false beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that don't exist), unusual physical behavior, and disorganized thinking and speech) .Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for five of six sampled residents (Resident 191, Resident 3, Resident 6, Resident 1, and Resident 34) when: 1. Resident 191 had one eye drops bottle stored in the medication cart in Hallway 3 without a resident identifier. 2. Inhalers (a device used to give medications in the form of a spray that is breathed in through the mouth) for Resident 3, Resident 6, Resident 18, and Resident 34 were stored in the medication cart in Hallway 3 without residents' identifiers. These failures had the potential for the medications to be given to the wrong residents which could cause adverse reactions (harmful, unintended result caused by a medication) and/or cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) which could cause an infection (when germs enter a person's body and multiply,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage under sanitary conditions for one of two dumpsters when trash was found on the ground around the dumpster. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects, and flies and could spread infection which placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/25/2023, at 4:05 p.m., with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) in the facility trash dumpster area near the parking spaces, there was trash, white plastic bag, plastic food bag, napkin/tissues, torn pieces of Styrofoam, and various pieces of paper, found on ground between the dumpster and a chain-link fence. MDSC confirmed there was trash on the ground between the dumpster and a chain-link fence. The MDSC stated, the dumpster should not have any trash around it because it would attract pests. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) title, Sanitization, revised November 2022, the P&P indicated, .waste is properly contained in dumpsters/compactors with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-04-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staffing information was posted daily at the beginning of each shift for two out of four days (4/13/22 and 4/15/22). This failure resulted in facility staffing information not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/22, at 2:30 p.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), near the front entrance of the facility, the posted nursing staffing information was for 4/12/22 [previous day]. ADON stated he had forgotten to post the nursing staffing information for today [4/13/22]. ADON stated he was responsible for posting the nursing staffing information from Monday to Friday. ADON stated he does not print and post the weekend nursing staffing information. ADON stated he was not aware that he must post the nursing staffing information every day, including weekends. ADON stated without the posted nursing information, residents, staff and visitors would not know if the facility was meeting the required daily nursing hours to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The three compartment sinks (three sinks used for washing dishes, one for washing, one for rinsing and one for sanitizing dishes) and a food preparation sink did not have an air gap. 2. The handwashing sink in dish room did not have soap and one Dietary Aide (DA) failed to properly wash hands after handling soiled items; 3. There were multiple areas in the kitchen, kitchen equipment and food storage areas that were not clean. 4. Dietary staff was storing food ingredients in trash bags; and 5. Dietary staff were storing personal items in food storage areas. The facility's failures to ensure safe and sanitary conditions may result in the likelihood of cross contamination and exposure of microorganisms that harbor foodborne pathogens of residents' food resulting in food-borne illness to a population of Fifty three of 57 residents who received food from the kitchen and are medically compromised. Findings: 1. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash was found outside on the floor surrounding the dumpster. And the lids of the dumpsters did not close properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: During an observation on 4/12/22, at 1:52 PM, outside facility, there were 2 dumpsters. One of the dumpsters was recycle dumpster. The recycle dumpster lids were not closed. Trash was surrounding another dumpster floor and one of the lid was not closed. During an interview on 4/12/22, at 3:05 PM, with Food and Nutrition Director (FND), in front of dumpsters, FND stated it is inappropriate to have trash surrounding dumpster. My expectation is to have someone to clean, sanitize the area. Keep the odor away to avoid attract pests. During a review of the facility's policy titled Garbage, and Trash, Revised January 2021, indicated, Garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed The trash collection area is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program when: 1. There was no documented evidence that the screening questionnaires regarding signs and symptoms (S/S) of Coronavirus (COVID-19, a serious respiratory illness caused by a virus which is the cause of a current worldwide pandemic transmission) and vaccination status of each visitor/staff had been reviewed by a facility representative from 4/1/2022 until 4/14/2022 [14 days]. This failure placed all residents, visitors and staff who entered the facilitity from 4/1/2022 until 4/14/2022 at risk for COVID-19 . 2. Hospice Nurse (HN, a nurse providing care for individual with terminal illness) did not disinfect the blood pressure cuff and sphygmomanometer (medical instrument for checking blood pressure) after use for one of four sampled residents (Resident 24). This failure placed Resident 24 at risk for cross contamination. Findings: During a concurrent interview, and record review on 04/14/22, at 09:59 AM, with the Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment when the window sills were separating from the window's wooden frame exposing nails, splinters and letting in outside air for two of 34 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]B and room [ROOM NUMBER]B). This failure placed Resident 20 and Resident 30 at risk for splinters and nail injuries and placed Resident 20 and 30 at risk for increased hot and cold temperatures. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/13/22, the AR indicated, Resident 30 was a [AGE] year old female who was admitted from an acute care hospital on 5/15/21 to the facility, whose diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF, weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the lungs) and Generalized Muscle Weakness. During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for five of 15 sampled residents (Residents 158, 24, 25, 26, and 8) when: 1. Resident 158's use of dentures were not care planned. This failure resulted in Resident 158 not enjoying her food due to being on a puree diet and having her needs not met. 2. The hospice status (the type of care provided at the end of life and centered on promoting comfort and pain-free existence) for Resident 24 and Resident 26 was not care planned. These failures had the potential for the hospice needs for Resident 24 and 26 to go unmet. 3. Resident 25 care plan for site dressing change for tube feeding was not followed. This failure had the potential for infection at the insertion site of Resident 25's Gastrostomy (G-tube- an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) site. 4. Resident 8 did not have a care plan developed and implemented for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standard of practice for one of four sampled residents (Resident 42) when facility staff did not follow the physician's order to administer continuous oxygen via nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 42 to experience shortness of breath, headache, weakness, and trouble sleeping. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/13/22, the AR indicated, Resident 42 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] to the facility, whose diagnoses included Intracranial Hemorrhage (brain bleed, bleeding between the brain tissue and skull), Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when 15 medication errors were observed during 27 medication administration opportunities, which resulted in an error rate of 55.56 percent. These failures resulted in Resident 8 and Resident 30 not being informed of the medications being administered and had the potential for unsafe medication administration and untherapeutic medication effects for Resident 8 and Resident 30. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/14/22, at 10:38 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4), LVN 4 was observed preparing Resident 8's medications. LVN 4 was outside Resident 8's room. LVN 4 stated she was giving Resident 8 the following medications: amiodarone (irregular rhythm medication), amlodipine (blood pressure medication), Aspirin (pain, fever, and inflammation reducer), Carvedilol (treats high blood pressure and heart failure), Eliquis (blood thinner), Ferrous sulfate (treats low iron levels), Finasteride (treats benign prostatic hyperplasia),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. Food and Nutrition Director (FND) did not follow manufacture temperature guideline for testing the Quaternary (Quat) ammonia sanitizer. 2. [NAME] 2 was unable to properly calibrated the thermometer. 3. [NAME] 1 did not follow the recipe for making Cabbage and carrots. Failure to ensure staff competency may result in resident exposure to bacterial growth associated with foodborne, incorrect and/or holding temperatures and practices that affect meal palatability to a population of Fifty three of 57 residents who received food from the kitchen and are medically compromised. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/12/22, at 9:59 AM, the Food and Nutrition Director (FND) was preparing Quat sanitizer. It was noted as the FND filled the bucket, there was moisture resembling steam on the surface of the solution in the bucket. The FND checked the temperature of the solution and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal delivery observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy on Meal Service to provide appetizing food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences for four of fifty-three sampled residents (Resident 24, Resident 50, and Resident 53 and Resident 158). This failure placed residents at potential risk to decrease nutritional intake and affect the resident's nutrition status. Finding: During an interview on 4/13/22, at 11:15 AM, Resident 158 stated, . sometimes the food is cold . During the confidential resident council meeting, on 4/13/22, at 2:00 PM, three of five residents (Resident 24, Resident 50, and Resident 53) stated they received cold foods. During an observation on 4/14/22, at 4:58 PM, with the Food and Nutrition Director (FND), meal cart containing a test tray left the kitchen. On 4/14/22, at 5:13 PM, the last resident meal was served. On 4/14/22, at 5:14 PM, in the small dining room, in the presence of the Administrator (ADM), and FND, an evaluation for temperature and palatability, of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards of practices for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 58) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 did not conduct a complete assessment and accurately document Resident 58's medical condition. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 did not complete and accurately document Resident 58's vital signs (clinical measurements, specifically pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure, that indicate the state of a patient's body functions). These failures resulted in inaccurate documentation and resulted in delayed treatment for Resident 58. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/13/22, the AR indicated, Resident 58 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 1/16/22 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 15 residents (Resident 25) when: 1. Resident 25's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, is a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) feeding was not changed in accordance with the physician orders. 2. Resident 25's G- tube dressing was not changed daily in accordance with the physician orders. These failures had the potential for Resident 25 to receive inadequate nutrition via the G-tube feedings and had the potential for Resident 25 to develop gastrointestinal issues and infection. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 25's admission RECORD (AR- document that provides residents name, date of birth , admission date, insurance information, contact information, diagnosis's and more), dated 4/14/22 was reviewed. The AR indicated, Resident 25 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with their policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Administration, when the oxygen tubing was not changed as ordered for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 35). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 35 to develop a respiratory infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission RECORD (AR- document that provides residents name, date of birth , admission date, insurance information, contact information, diagnosis's and more), dated 4/14/22, the AR indicated Resident 35 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild loss of strength in leg, arm or face) following Cerebral Infarction (damage or death to brain tissue due to lack of oxygen), Disorders of Diaphragm (major muscle of respiration located below the lungs), Anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct adequate monitoring for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 54) when bupropion (a medication used to treat depression) was not appropriately monitored for negative effects. This failure had the potential to cause serious negative effects to Resident 54, including but not limited to changes in mood, thoughts of suicide, fast heartbeat, muscle pain, seizures, constipation, weight gain or weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/15/22, the AR indicated, Resident 54 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 4/23/21 to the facility, whose diagnoses included Paraplegia (immobility of the legs and lower body), Major Depressive Disorder (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Muscle Weakness. During a review of Resident 54's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 4/15/22, the OSR indicated, buPROpion Hcl [Hydrochloride] . Tablet 100 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Food and Nutrition Director (FND) effectively monitored the dietetic service operations in accordance with the Dietary Service Manager job description. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective and inadequate directing of the day-to-day foodservice operations to ensure the nutritional needs fifty three of 57 residents were met in a safe and sanitary manner. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/12/22, beginning at 8:43 A.M., observations and concurrent interviews were conducted with the FND regarding overall kitchen sanitation and cleanliness. There were multiple areas and equipment in the kitchen that were not clean including but not limited to dust and black/brown debris on the fan above dish room, the light fixtures above 3 compartment sinks and above tray line and the air conditioner in the dry food storage. Additionally, staff were using a black trash bag as a food liner to store flour and dietary staff were storing personal items in dry food storage room. During an observation, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preferences were honored for one of 57 sampled residents (Resident 158) when beef was placed on Resident 158's lunch plate, despite beef being listed as a dislike. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake, and could result in unplanned weight loss, further compromising Resident 158's nutritional and medical status. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/13/22, at 12:31 PM, with Resident 158, in the dining room, Resident 158 meal tray ticket indicated dislike beef. Resident 158 received Corned Beef with her lunch. In a concurrent interviewed, Resident 158 stated I do not like beef. During an interview on 04/13/22, at 12:32 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 and Food and Nutrition Director (FND), in the dining room, CNA 1 checked menu posted on the dining room wall and stated, today lunch is Corned Beef, and the brown color pureed meat is Corned Beef. Verification of meal tray ticket with the CNA 1, confirmed dislikes in meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's prescribed diet order, regular diet, regular texture, for one of 57 sampled residents (Resident 33) during lunch on 4/13/22 which result in Resident 33 receiving the wrong prescribed lunch meal. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake, and could result in unplanned weight loss, further compromising the nutritional and medical status of Resident 33. Findings: During an observation, of the noon meal plating, on 4/13/22, at 12:02 PM, [NAME] 1 served mechanical soft Corned Beef for Resident 33. Resident 33's lunch meal tray ticket indicated, Diet: 2 gram Sodium, Consistency: Mechanical soft. During a review of the Resident's 33 Order Summary Report, dated 4/14/22, Physician's Diet order indicated, Regular diet, Regular texture . During an interview on 04/14/22, at 11:40 AM, with Resident 33, at Resident 33's room, Resident 33 stated, I do not like provided foods. I do not know what kind of diet they give it to me. I want a regular diet and regular texture. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the survey period of 7/25/23 to 7/28/23, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in 18 out of 34 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19). This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an observation on 7/5/23, at 11:00 a.m., an environment tour was conducted with the Administrator, the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. These rooms were as follows: Room Number Square Feet Number of Residents 1 154.30 2 2 154.30 2 3 154.30 2 4 154.30 2 5 146.00 2 6 147.40 2 7 147.40 2 8 146.00 2 10 153.00 2 11 149.00 2 12 146.30 2 13 146.30 2 14 145.00 2 15 146.50 2 16 146.50 2 17 146.50 2 18 145.20 2 19 231.00 3 However, variations were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-04-15 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the survey period of 4/12/22 to 4/15/22, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in 18 out of 34 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19). This failure had the potential for residents in Rooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During an observation on 4/13/22, at 5:54 p.m., an environment tour was conducted with the maintenance supervisor, the inspection indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum square footage as required by regulation. These rooms were as follows: Room Number Square Feet Number of Residents 1 154.30 2 2 154.30 2 3 154.30 2 4 154.30 2 5 146.00 2 6 147.40 2 7 147.40 2 8 146.00 2 10 153.00 2 11 149.00 2 12 146.30 2 13 146.30 2 14 145.00 2 15 146.50 2 16 146.50 2 17 146.50 2 18 145.20 2 19 231.00 3 However, variations were in accordance with the particular needs of the residents. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
CLAWSON, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER48%since 03/01/2021
WILLIAMS, RYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER48%since 10/01/2019
TEXAS CAPITAL BANK NAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/17/2025
FIELDS, DOMONIQUEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
FLAKE, ETHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/07/2024
MODI, ISHANKUMARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/04/2019
MOSHER, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/08/2024
MURRAY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2024
SOARES, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2021
CHEN, KAI SHINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/04/2021
JONES, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
BLAKE, MARTHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
CARDOSO, ELDBERTOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/07/2022
DURAN, JUANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/02/2019
SAGRERO MENDOZA, ADRIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/28/2022
TYSON, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2025
VERMA, ATULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$575K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 34%Medicare 58%Other / private 8%

This home reported $575K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$650per resident / day
operating cost
$19,746per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$651per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055869. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next