No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Villas At Saratoga Skilled Nsg & Assisted Lvg

20400 Saratoga-Los Gatos Rd, Saratoga, CA 95070 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (408) 741-2950 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 741-2950 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$40,323 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $40,323 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-25)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
15315 Bohlman Rd · (650) 248-6240 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
20490 Saratoga Los Gatos Rd
Grocery
13765 Pierce Rd · (408) 868-0461 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
20390 Park Pl · (408) 867-1000

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.8%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.0%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.7%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.702.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.141.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 448 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 204 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.1%CMS range 56.4–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.6–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.3–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.39
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
21.5%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-20)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2022-11-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) for bed mobility, transfer, ambulation, maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort) for toileting hygiene (process of using commode for urination and bowel movement), and failed to document comprehensive risk for fall care plan with person centered interventions for staff's assistance for bed mobility, transfer, ambulation, toileting and hygiene to prevent a fall for one of three sampled resident (Resident 2). Above these failures were resulted in an unwitnessed fall with right femur neck ((part of the largest, and strongest thigh bone that connects the ball shaped head of the femur to the rest of the bone, critical structural component of the hip joint) fracture (broken bone) and underwent surgery (a medical procedure, often involving cutting into the body) to fix the fracture for Resident 2.Findings:Review of Resident 2's face sheet (a document that gives…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide free of accident hazard during transfer for one of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to complete a fall risk evaluation for Resident 1 upon admission, Certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) did not follow the Hoyer (an assistive device that allows patients to be transferred between a bed and a chair or other similar resting places, by the use of electrical or hydraulic power) lift's user instruction manual when CNA A did not check the sling which suitable for the particular resident, the correct size, and CNA A did not follow the policy and procedure about using a mechanical lifting machine to gently support the resident as she moved. These failures resulted in Resident 1's fall and send to acute hospital that caused Resident 1 small left sub-insular (a lobe in the brain) white matter and post-central gyrus (region of the brain that perceives various sensations from the body including touch, pressure, temperature, and pain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment when one resident (Resident 1) out of five sampled residents did not receive adequate supervision when Resident 1 was able to leave the facility alone unattended on 4/7/26. This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming intoxicated due to alcohol consumption while outside the facility and put Resident 1 at risk for physical injury, dehydration, and psychosocial distress. Upon return to the facility, Resident 1 was sent via 911 (emergency services) to acute hospital for evaluation. During an interview on 4/8/26 at 11:03 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 1 left the faciity on 4/7/26 and returned at around 10 p.m. intoxicated (being drunk or under the influence of drugs, where alcohol or substances impair a person's physical and mental abilities). The DON stated Resident 1 was also brought to the hospital to be checked and returned this morning of 4/8/26.During a tour and observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to notify local police, ombudsman (independent official, who advocates residents), and state agency in a timely manner following an allegation of abuse reported by facility's staff member for one out of two sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for further abuse and delay implementation of appropriate corrective actions for sampled Resident 1.Findings:Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS, a document that provides resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 was admitted in facility on 4/11/2025.Review of Resident 1's admission diagnoses included dementia (a decline in mental ability such as memory, reasoning, and communication, severe enough to interfere with daily life) and anxiety (persistent and excessive worry and fear of danger).Review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, clinical and functional assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 1 had short-term (time period, typically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to maintain standard infection prevention and control practices to prevent the spread of infections when: 1.Unlabeled wash basins left on floor in resident's bathroom and in sink;2.Clean and used equipment storage areas were not separated in oxygen (O2, colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas essential for life) supplies storage room;3.House Keeping staff did not perform hand hygiene after removed gloves. These failures had the potential for all currently residing 84 residents in facility at increased risk of healthcare- associated infections. Findings:1.During an observation on 2/25/2026 at 10:13 a.m., noted two unlabeled wash basins (a plastic basin used for personal care for residents) left next to sink on floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom and one unlabeled wash basin left in sink in Room1.During room [ROOM NUMBER] observation on 2/25/2025 at 10:20 a.m., noted one unlabeled wash basin left in sink in room [ROOM NUMBER].During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (an individualized, collaborative document that focuses on a resident specific needs, goals, preferences and values) for speech therapy (ST, a specialized healthcare service that diagnoses and treat communication, language, cognitive, and swallowing disorders for residents) for one of 3 sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in not meeting Resident 1's plan of care needs. Findings:Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS, a document that provides resident's information at quick glance) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 10/23/2025.Review of Resident 1's diagnoses included parkinsonism (a condition characterized by slow body movements, stiffness, balance issues and resting tremors (shaking), spasmodic torticollis (a painful, chronic disorder causing involuntary contractions [a sudden, involuntary tightening of muscles, causes pain, stiffness, and reduced movement] of the neck muscles).Review of Resident 1's order review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide safe environment to prevent the risk for accident hazard in one of 3 sample resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and in oxygen (O2, colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas essential for life) supplies storage room when: One emergency oxygen tank (E tank, a heavy, portable, and high pressure metal cylinder containing pure medical-grade O2) on floor, free standing, and not secured in a sturdy portable cart (a mobile, wheeled device designed for the quick, safe transport of E tank and prevents accidents by securely holding when not in use) when not in use in room [ROOM NUMBER];Cluttered and not organized O2 supplies storage room in Building 1 with E tanks on floor, free standing, not secured in a portable cart and several room air concentrators (RAC, a medical device that draws in room air, filters and provides purified O2) on floor. Above failures had the potential for accident hazard with or without injury and safety for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumonia (PNA, an infection in one or both lungs [a pair of spongy organs in the chest that serve as the main components for breathing], that can cause mild to serious illness) vaccine (substance that making body stronger against specific harmful germs) timely for one of five sampled resident (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 2's health and well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to facility on 6/2/2021 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic and progressive condition where heart muscle too weak to pump blood efficiently, causing fluid to back up into the lungs), chronic kidney (bean shaped organ, that filters waste products from blood to produce urine) disease (a long-term, progressive condition often irreversible loss of kidney function), and hypertension (high blood pressure).Review of Resident 2's immunization audit report indicated Resident 2 received PCV 13 (Prevnar 13, type of PNA vaccine) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to administer pain medication as needed when nursing staff noted with signs and symptoms (S/S including moaning, groaning, restlessness, agitation, crying, facial grimacing and guarding the affected area) of pain for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) to meet professional standards of care.This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's pain management, health condition and well-being. Findings:Review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 3/13/2024.Review of Resident 1's order review history report for August,2025 indicated Resident 1's had an order for acetaminophen (medication used to relieve mild to moderate pain) 325 MG (milligram, a unit of weight or mass, equal to a thousandth of a gram) every 4 hours as needed for mild pain . dated 6/28/2024.Review of Resident 1's change in condition evaluation (COC: any significant shift in physical, mental or functional status from baseline need timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide resident's room free from sound for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings:During telephone interview with Resident 1's significant family member (SFM) on 10/21/2025 at 1:09 pm., SFM stated noise from metal plate from facility's drive way making Resident 1 not having quiet time in the room. SFM also stated every time people step on or cars passing by on metal plate, making sound, can hear from Resident 1's room.During an observation on 10/22/025 at 10:52 a.m., noted metal plate located on driveway, outside, near Resident 1's room, made sound metal plate moved when stepped on. Also heard the sound when car passed on this metal plate after few minutes later.During an observation on 10/22/2025 at 10:55 a.m., noted another metal plate located near the end of drive way where delivery trucks parking to unload, made sound when stepped on the plate.During concurrent observation and interview with facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications (chemicals or compounds used to cure, halt, or prevent diseases or illnesses) left unattended in resident's room for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1)'s room. This failure had the potential for residents to have an unsafe access to medications. Findings: During an observation on 10/22/2025 at 11:08 a.m., noted 4 purple color capsules, 5 clear yellow color capsules, 1 pink color tablet and 1 white color tablet inside in a small clear plastic medication cup (used to carry medications to take to resident's room to administer), clear thick liquid 10 milliliter (ml: volume of liquid, equal to one thousandth of one liter) in another medication cup, and glass of water on a tray table next to Resident 1's bed while Resident 1 in bed. No license staff presence in Resident 1' room. Review of Resident's face sheet (FS: a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 eloped and found on the street after being monitored by the nursing staff.This failure placed residents at risk for further elopement. Findings: Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 8/6/24, indicated the resident had severe impairment in daily decision-making skills.Review of Resident 1's Nurse's Note, dated 6/22/25 at 2:43 p.m., indicated the resident was alert with confusion, had an episode of going to another resident's room, and tried to awaken a resident by touching and shaking.Review of Resident 1's care plan, dated 6/22/25, indicated to monitor behavior of going to other resident room, with an approach to redirect resident to her room or activity room. On 6/24/25, a care plan was developed addressing the resident was at risk for elopement/wandering related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely suspend two certified nurse assistants (CNA) who had an allegations of resident mistreatment in accordance with their abuse policy for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for further mistreatment should the allegation be proven.Findings:1.Review of Resident 1's Nurses Notes, dated 5/17/25 at 1:50 p.m., indicated the resident reported CNA A and told Resident 1 to shut up and mind your own business on 5/16/25. The same note indicated Resident 1 stated there were a few other times when the resident was verbally disrespected by the same CNA A and she felt belittled.During an interview on 7/2/25 at 12:29 p.m., the registered nurse (RN) B stated when she learned about Resident 1's allegation she did not suspend CNA A.2.Review of Resident 2's Nurse's Notes, dated 6/13/25 at 6:47 p.m. indicated the resident reported to therapy staff that she was punched and poked on the sides of her abdomen while being changed by CNA B when Resident 2 cannot urinate past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of care when staff did not intervene for a resident who was known to feed a roommate with swallowing problems (Residents 1 and 2). For Resident 3 she was not adequately monitored to prevent elopement and there was no policy addressing wander guard (alarm device such as a wrist band that sound when a person exits) maintenance and function for two of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 3). These failures placed residents at health and safety risk.Findings:1. Review of Resident 2's face sheet (document summarizing a resident's essential medical information) indicated she had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid) and dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily function). Her Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool, dated 4/18/25, indicated Resident 2 had severe problems with daily decision-making skills.Resident 2 had a physician's order, dated 6/5/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-20 · tag F0800 — widespread
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure overall dietetic services systems for food safety and sanitation were met, according to standards of practice and facility policy. This failure exposed the residents to contaminants (potentially harmful substances) in foods and unsanitary practices, which could have further compromised their nutritional status. The facility census was 84. Cross reference F802, F803, F804, F808, F812, and F908 Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/16/24 starting at 9:07 A.M., multiple observations of unsanitary and unsafe equipment cleaning and food production practices in dietetic services were observed, including: the lack of kitchen cleanliness monitoring, lack of dish machine sanitizing monitoring, lack of recent kitchen staff food safety training, lack of kitchen staff following standardized recipes and therapeutic menus, and lack of an emergency menu for therapeutic diets. 1) Food Safety Storage and Production-Preparation: a. During the initial kitchen tour observation on 12/16/24 at 9:08…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food and nutrition services staff performed their job tasks competently according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. A Dietary Aide did not follow the recipe for puree salmon and a Diet Aide did not follow the recipe for tuna sandwiches. 2. A Dietary Aide did not properly test the sanitizing step of the high temperature dishwasher machine. 3. A Dietary Aide did not correctly demonstrate how to calibrate a food thermometer. These failures had the potential to expose residents to bacterial contamination, that could result in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84. Cross reference F800, 803 Findings: 1. a) During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 9:45 a.m., a [NAME] K (CK K) was observed putting 5 scoops of bake salmon to blender machine, she added 2 cups of water using an aluminum measuring cup, then she blended it in a blender. After blending the pureed salmon, she acknowledged it was very watery. CK K…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure safe and sanitary practices were followed and maintained for food production and storage according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. An old dinner meal plate from the previous day was found inside the kitchen microwave the following day at 11:50 am. 2. Two dirty electric fans were inside the kitchen's food preparation and clean dish areas; 3. A cracked, dented, and worn aluminum measuring cup was used to make puree meals; These failures had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare and serve coffee in a safe and sanitary manner. Facility census was 84. Cross reference F800, F802, F803 Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour observation on 12/16/24 at 9:30 a.m., a plate with a meat entrée resembling a pork chop, rice, broccoli, and a wheat dinner roll was found inside the microwave. During a follow up kitchen observation on 12/16/24 at 11:50 a.m., the meal plate was still inside the microwave. On 12/16/24 at 3:20 p.m., during an observation of the microwave,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 4 residents (Residents 16, 62 and 84) had been informed about having an advance directive (AD, legal form directing their wishes about their healthcare, whether from them or a named individual on their behalf), when no documentation was found about AD and the Physician Orders for Life -Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a legal document stating the kinds of medical treatments patients want toward the end of their lives) was not completed and readily available in the event of a medical emergency. This failure had the potential to result in the inability to make medical decisions, and could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services. Findings: a. Review of Resident 16's face sheet (FC, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 16 was admitted to facility on 7/8/15. Review of Resident 16's clinical record, indicated, there was no documentation of whether Resident 16 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their bed rail (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) policy for 12 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, 23, 33, 43, 51, 67, 70 and 82). The facility failed to follow their bed rail policy for use of grab bars when: 1. For Resident #2 there was no physician order for the use of grab bars; 2. For Resident #43 and Resident 67 there was no physician order for the use of grab bars; 3. For Residents # 23, 33, 8, and 82, there were no care plans for the use of grab bars; 4. For Resident # 70, there was no physician order or care plan for the use of grab bars; 5. For Resident # 4, and 20 there was no physician order or care plan for the use of grab bars; 6. For Resident # 4, 16, 20, and 51 there were no care plans for the use of grab bars; These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' health and safety. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/16/24 at 1:08 p.m., in Resident 2's room, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure standardized recipes for pureed meals and menus, which includes the emergency food supply were followed as printed, according to facility policy when: 1. A kitchen staff did not follow the facility's pureed diet lunch menu on 12/16/24 and 12/17/24. 2. A facility emergency menus unavailable These failures had the potential to alter the palatability and nutritional value of the food, which could decrease food intake and compromise the resident's nutritional status for 77 residents consuming food from the kitchen. Cross reference 800, 802 Findings: 1.a) During a review of the facility's Winter Menus, Week 3-Monday 12/16/24, the lunch meal pureed diet includes Fish Fillet with Tarragon Sauce, Tartar Sauce, Cajun Country Rice, Creamed Spinach, Parsley Sprig Garnish, Sweet Corn Salad, and Fruit Bavarian Cream. During an observation on 12/16/24 at 1:02 p.m., with Resident 56, Resident 56 was observed eating her lunch meal in front of St. Catherine's nurse's station. Resident 56 had no puree spinach on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure the standardized recipes for the puree diet was followed as printed. This failure had the potential to alter the palatability and nutritional value of the food, which could decrease food intake and compromise the nutritional status of twelve residents on puree diets. Cross reference F800 and F805 Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 9:45 a.m., a [NAME] K (CK K) was observed putting 5 scoops of bake salmon to blender machine, she added 2 cups of water using an aluminum measuring cup, then she blended it in a blender. After blending the pureed salmon, she acknowledged it was very watery. CK K then added 2 scoops of thickener to salmon mixture and started mixing it. CK K stated did not know how much water or thickener she added because there weren't any measurement numbers on the cup and scoop she used. CK K then stated she would add more thickener if needed to make it thick. During a review of recipe titled Pureed Meats there is a direction indicated, 1. Complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure 21 residents receive their physician ordered therapeutic diet to meet their nutrition needs. This failure had the potential for to decrease nutrient intake and may have contribute to weight loss. Finding: According to a literature review of malnutrition, leading modifiable risk factors of malnutrition in Long-term care (LTC) include .poor nutrition .poor food/fluid intake .dependence on others for eating and impaired mobility. Additional .factors that lead to poor oral intake include poor food delivery systems . ([NAME], K.N.P., [NAME], S.R. & [NAME], C.W. Nutritional Vulnerability in Older Adults: A Continuum of Concerns. [NAME] Nutr Rep 4, 176-184 (2015). During a review of Facility Diet Order Tally Report-All Special Diets dated 12/16/24, indicated 21 residents were listed to receive a Fortified Diet (a Fortified diet is designed for residents who cannot consume adequate amounts of calories and/or protein to maintain their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat three of 18 sampled residents (Residents 25, 45, and 64) with respect and dignity when: 1. The certified nurse assistant (CNA) stood beside the residents to assist with their meals, and 2. Resident 25's urine bag (bag that is attached to a tube that is connected to the bladder) was not covered. These failures resulted in not ensuring residents were treated with respect and dignity, and could potentially affect the residents' self-worth. Findings 1.During a dining observation on 12/16/24 at 12:37 a.m., the CNA G assisted Resident 45 with her meal. The CNA G was standing while trying to feed Resident 45. At 12:40 a.m., the CNA G assisted Resident 64 with her meal. The CNA G was standing while feeding Resident 64. During an interview with the CNA G on 12/16/24 at 2:01 p.m., the CNA G confirmed the above observations and stated she should sit down when providing assistance to residents during meals. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) H, on 12/16/24 at 2:05 p.m., the LVN H stated staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 20) to address the use of Clopidogrel (medication used to prevent blood clots). This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to implement interventions to maintain the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 20's clinical record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (or coronary heart disease, a condition that occurs when plaque builds up in the walls of arteries, making it difficult for blood to flow) of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris (chest pain or discomfort due to CHD), and drug induced Cushing's syndrome (a rare, chronic condition that occurs when the body produces too much cortisol [a hormone that helps the body respond to stress, maintain blood pressure , and regulate inflammation]). Review of Resident 20's Physician Order, dated 10/11/24 indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care according to facility policy and procedure for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 70) when a registered nurse (RN B) did not have the running of the continuous tube feeding (nutrition that is given through a tube that goes directly into the stomach) placed on hold when they put Resident 70's head of the bed flat to carry out a pressure ulcer treatment. This failure had the potential for enteral feeding complications that could cause harm to this resident. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/19/24 at 6:51 AM, RN B placed Resident 70's head of the bed flat from its previous 30 degrees elevated position with tube feeding machine running the entire time. When asked about should be done with continuous tube feedings when putting the resident's head of the bed flat, RN B said, We hold the tube feeding. The feeding is paused. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 12/19/24 at 11:29 AM, the DON said continuous tube feedings should be held when providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (procedure to remove waste and excess fluid from the body) communication reports were complete (NDCRs) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 62). This failure had the potential to put Resident 62 at risk for complications. Findings: Review of Resident 62's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (the kidney's no longer functioning on a permanent basis) and hypertensive (high blood pressure) chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Resident 62's NDCRs dated 11/19/24, 11/23/24, and 12/12/24 were reviewed. The portion of the NDCRs to document Resident 62's post dry weight was left blank. During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) H on 12/18/24 at 10:44 a.m., LVN H reviewed Resident 62's NDCRs dated 11/19/24, 11/23/24, and 12/12/24 and confirmed they were incomplete. LVN H stated the NDCRs should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled drugs (those with high potential for abuse and addiction), when there were discrepancies between the controlled drug record (CDR, an inventory/accountability sheet) and the medication administration record (MAR) for 3 out of 6 residents (Residents 33, 9 and 28). This failure had the potential for abuse or misuse of controlled drugs. Findings: During the survey, the CDR (or count sheet) for six residents receiving PRN (as needed) controlled medications were requested for review. During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 12/17/24 at 1:54 p.m., the ADON stated when a resident requests for a PRN (as needed) controlled medication, the nurse assesses the resident for pain severity; reviews the physician's order, and administers the medication if it's within the appropriate administration time to give the medication, removes the medication from the medication cart; signs it out of the count sheet; administers the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) was limited to 14 days for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to result in the resident receiving the medication for an excessive length of time and experiencing adverse medication side effects. Findings: Review of Resident 2's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (decline in mental capacity affecting daily function), delusional disorders (mental health condition in which a person can't tell what's real from what's imagined), and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident 2's physician order dated 9/26/24 indicated Seroquel (antipsychotic medication that calms the mind and reduces anxiety) 25 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement). Give 12.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for psychosis (a mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 8.82% when three medication errors occurred out of 34 opportunities during the medication administration for two of four residents (Residents 18 and 89). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which may result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications or adverse effects, compromising their health. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 12/16/24 at 9:14 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) C, RN C was observed preparing twenty medications for Resident 89 including an Arnuity Ellipta inhaler (medication used to treat the symptoms of asthma (an inflammatory disease of the airway that often causes wheezing, coughing, and shortness of breath). On 12/16/24 at 9:35 a.m., at the bedside of Resident 89, RN C gave the Arnuity Ellipta inhaler to the resident. Resident 89 self-administered two puffs of the oral inhaler simultaneously one after another.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Staff failed to ensure the dirty linen container was fully covered by having dirty linen sticking out of the container; 2. Staff failed to ensure a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP, machine used to treat sleep apnea [a condition where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep]) mask and hose were properly disinfected; 3. Staff failed to label two urinals found in a shared resident bathroom with resident identifier; 4. During a treatment, a registered nurse (RN) grabbed multiple items with gloved hands without changing the gloves, 5. One licensed vocational nurse(LVN) did not disinfect the glucometer in between blood sugar level checks. These failures had the potential to compromise residents' health and safety in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) G on 12/16/24 at 11:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a coffee machine was maintained in a safe operable condition according to manufacturer's guidelines and facility policy. This failure had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare and serve coffee in a safe and sanitary manner. Facility census was 84. Cross reference F800 Findings: During an observation of the lunch trayline meal service on 12/16/24 and 12/17/24, the Diet Aide N (DA N) was observed preparing coffee for the resident meals using the coffee machine. DA N prepared 78 cups of coffee on 12/16/24 and 77 cups of coffee on 12/17/24 during each of the lunch meal services. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 9:50 a.m., with the Foodservices Director (FSD), the FSD confirmed the coffee machine had three missing buttons, electrical wires exposed inside each button space, and a clear strip of tape securing the coffee machine's door. The FSD stated the coffee machine had these issues for several months but the facility was on a wait list to get a different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the food and nutrition services when: 1. Food storage containers were wet, and with white stains in kitchen storage cabinets; 2. Utensil storage drawer had brown dried particles; 3. Food blender black gasket with brown dried particles; 4. [NAME] cutting board with stained and scratches; 5. Tip of can opener blade with small black substance; and 6. Ice scooper was placed close to a soap dispenser. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illness among residents. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour with the kitchen supervisor (KS) on 11/7/22 at 8:45 a.m., noted one eight quarts (unit of measurement) plastic food storage container was wet with water droplets and white stains. This container was stacked on top of five other wet containers in one of the kitchen cabinet. Nine other four quarts plastic food storage containers, and two lids were stacked wet with water droplets, in another kitchen cabinet. The KS confirmed those containers, and lids…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. The facility did not implement COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease) screening protocol; 2. Staff did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks; 3. Clean linen room had debris, dust, loose off-white particles and black matter stuck to the floor; 4. Soiled linen bin with dirty linens in it was left opened in the hallway; 5. Resident's used surgical mask was left hanging on a wheelchair handle; 6. A used mask was left on the screening table; 7. The treatment nurse (TN) did not perform hand hygiene in between task; and 8. Staff did not wear gloves in handling soiled linen. These failures could result in the spread of infection and cross-contamination that could affect the 86 residents who resides in the facility. Findings: 1a. During an observation on 11/7/22 at 8:00 a.m., there were no instruction what personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards) needs to be worn or if screening was required before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect was provided for one of three residents (Resident 6) when staff did not assist Resident 6 during lunch while other residents at the same table were already eating. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: During a dining observation on 11/7/22 at 12:17 p.m., Resident 6 was sitting in the dining room, tapping the table with his right hand and was waiting for staff to assist him with lunch. Another resident (Resident 13) at the same table was already eating. During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse a (LVN A) on 11/07/22 at 12:24 p.m., LVN A confirmed the above observation and confirmed Resident 6 needed staff assistance with eating and Resident 6 should have been attended to. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/14/22 at 11:17 a.m., she stated all residents' needs should be attended to and all residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess if the resident was safe to self-administer medications for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 49). This failure had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration and could have allowed other residents to access unlocked medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/10/22 9:42 a.m., in Resident 49's room, observed resident handed a Combivent 20-100 inhaler (medication to treat and prevent wheezing and shortness of breath caused by ongoing lung diseases) to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C. Resident 49 stated the inhaler was left on her over bed table the night before. During an interview on 11/10/22 9:50 a.m., with LVN C, she confirmed above observation, and stated the inhaler should have been collected by the nurse right after administration. During an interview on 11/10/22 10/45 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), she stated licensed nurse should have taken the inhaler back after administration and stored it in the medication cart. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure time change was communicated to one of 18 resident (Resident 52) when Resident 52 was not aware the day light saving time (DST) ended. This failure had the potential to result in resident needs not being met. Findings: During an interview with Resident 52 on 11/7/22 at 12:47 p.m., Resident 52 stated she was not aware there was a time change. Resident 52 further stated she was not happy the facility did not announce the time change and was hungry. During a concurrent observation in Resident 52's room, there was a calendar of activities posted Resident 52's room but did not indicate an information regarding time change. During an interview with the activity director (AD) 11/9/22 at 8:38 a.m., the AD stated he announced the change of time last week during a mass and bingo game. The AD confirmed Resident 52 was not part of the mass or bingo game. The AD further acknowledged he was not able to update some resident's calendar. Review of the facility's policy, Accommodation of Needs, revised March 2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 18 residents (Residents 32, 138, and 139) were made aware of an advance directive. This failure had the potential of leaving residents not having a way for their health care wishes to be followed, by a selected representative, if they become incapacitated. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 32's medical record (record), record indicated, documentation of whether Resident 32 had an advance directive was not located. During an interview with licensed vocational nurse N (LVN N) on 11/09/22 at 3:30 p.m., LVN N stated, she helps with admissions, but was not sure if she helped with Resident 32's admission and advance directives. LVN N stated, once the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form is filled out, we put the POLST form in the doctors binder for them to sign. During a review of Resident 32's POLST, dated 10/27/22, the POLST indicated, no boxes were checked for: having an Advance Directive, Advance Directive not available, or No Advance Directive. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident or their representative in writing and the office of the long-term care ombudsman (ombudsman) for two of three residents (Residents 32 and 76) when transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure had the potential of residents being transferred wrongfully. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's medical record (record), record indicated she had been transferred to GACH five times. There was no indication of Resident 32, her representative, nor ombudsman had been notified of her transfer for any of the five transfers. During a review of Residents 76's medical record (record), record indicated she had been transferred to GACH once. There was no indication of Resident 76, her representative, nor ombudsman had been notified of her transfer to GACH. During an interview with the medical records (MR) on 11/10/22 at 1:28 p.m., the MR stated, if there is an unplanned discharge to GACH, nursing notifies ombudsman; if the discharge is planned, social services notifies ombudsman. The MR stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify two of three residents (Residents 32 and 76) or their representatives of the facility's bed hold policy when they were transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure had the potential of residents not being allowed to return to the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's medical record (record), record indicated she had been transferred to GACH five times. During a review of Residents 76's medical record (record), record indicated she had been transferred to GACH once. During an interview with the social services coordinator (SSC), on 11/10/22 at 1:31 p.m., the SSC stated, the nurse will ask the responsible party if they want a bed hold. A form is filled out and faxed to the ombudsman by social services. During an interview with the medical records (MR) on 11/14/22 at 11:11 a.m., the MR stated, she had brought SSC to surveyors and SSC had said they had not been filling out bed hold forms, so we don't have anything. Nothing for residents, representatives, or ombudsman, from either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident's clinical assessment) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA - a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their residents) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) for one of 21 residents after Resident 88 had a worsened pressure ulcer and a significant weight loss (weight loss of five percent or more in the last month, or ten percent or more in the last six months). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the planning of care and provision of appropriate services for this resident. Findings: A review of Resident 88's clinical record indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of urinary tract infection, COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability) screening document was accurately completed for one of 18 residents (Resident 50). This failure had the potential for mentally ill residents not to receive the required care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 50's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought, and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality). During a concurrent interview and record review with the minimum data set coordinator (MDSC) on 11/9/22 at 3:18 p.m., the MDSC reviewed Resident 50's PASRR and confirmed the question regarding mental disorder was answered No. The MDSC further stated the answer should be yes. According to PASRR Facility Training Update 111221 (ca.gov) website, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensue services provided meet professional standards for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident 14 and 48) when: 1. One nursing staff did not follow the physician's order for administering as needed Morphine (a controlled medication for moderate to severe pain) 2. One nursing staff did not use two identifiers to identify a resident prior medication administration. These failures had the potential for medication administration error (given a wrong dose) and administer a medication to a wrong resident. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 11/7/22, at 11:38 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) B drew 0.5 milliliter (ml, unit of measurement) of Morphine Sulfate solution 20 milligram (mg, unit of weight)/ml from a newly opened bottle using a syringe for Resident 48. A review of Resident 48's physician's order, indicated resident's Morphine order was: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution 20 MG/ML give 0.25 ml sublingually every 4 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain/ SOB, start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and grooming services were provided for two of two residents (Resident 15 and Resident 18) when Residents 15 and 18's fingernails were long, had yellow and black particles, and were not trimmed. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' care and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 15's clinical record, indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination and weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview with the treatment nurse (TN) on 11/7/22 at 9:54 a.m., inside Resident 15's room. Resident 15's fingernails were long, were yellowish in color and were not trimmed. The TN stated the fingernails should have been trimmed and kept clean and short. During an interview with certified nursing assistant Q (CNA Q) on 11/7/22 at 11:20 a.m., CNA Q stated CNAs were responsible in clipping residents' fingernails. During a concurrent interview and record review with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 50) received the necessary care, and services when: 1. Resident 6's wound assessment was not done; and 2. Resident 50's care plan intervention for the use of thrombo-embolic deterrent (TED, specialized stockings to help prevent leg swelling and blood clots) hose was not implemented. These failures had the potential to affect the resident's care, health, and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 6's clinical record indicated he was admitted with need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility, hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body). Review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool), dated 8/11/22, indicated his cognition was impaired. During an observation on 11/8/22 at 8:48 a.m., inside Resident 6's room, a band aid (dressing to cover wounds) was observed on his left hand. During a follow up observation with the Treatment Nurse (TN) on 11/9/22 at 2:34 p.m., in the activity room. Resident 6's wound on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent pressure injury for one of three residents (Resident 51) when white cream was applied to Resident 51's coccyx (tail bone) area not consistent to the physician order. This failure had the potential to cause of worsen pressure ulcers. Findings: Review of Resident 51's clinical record indicated he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pressure injury on the sacral region (coccyx). During a wound treatment observation in Resident 51's room on 11/14/22 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 51 coccyx area had a white cream. The TN then used gauze with normal saline to wipe out the white cream. During an interview with the TN on 10:32 a.m., the TN stated barrier cream should not cover Resident 51's wound bed. Review of Resident 51's physician order did not indicate any cream treatment on his coccyx. During an interview with the minimum data set coordinator MDSC) on 11/14/22 at 11:25 a.m., the MDSC stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents, (Resident 24, 64 and 2) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions and behavior) when: 1. For Resident 24, failed to identify and monitor the specific target behavior for the use of quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel, medication use to treat certain mental/mood conditions such as schizophrenia [severe mental disorder affecting how a person's think, feel and behaves]) 2. For Resident 64, the facility failed to ensure there was a specific duration of use for PRN (PRN, as needed) psychotropic medication that exceed 14 days for the use of Lorazepam (medication for anxiety [persistent feeling of worry and fears]); 3. For Resident 2, the facility failed to monitor a specific behavior for the use of Seroquel. These failures could result in lack of adequate monitoring and had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary medications. Findings: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when an insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar) pen had the pharmacy label on the cap instead of the body of the pen. This deficient practice had a potential to result in medication errors due to medications not being labeled and stored appropriately. Findings: On 11/14/22 1:26 p.m., the inspection of Medication Cart #1 with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), identified one insulin pens which had the pharmacy label on the cap instead of on the body of the pen. During a telephone interview with the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) on 11/14/22 at 1:48 p.m., he stated that it was advisable to put the pharmacy label on the body of the pen, not on the cap, to prevent mix-up errors. A review of the 2017 Institute for Safe Medication Practices' (ISMP, a nonprofit patient safety organization with recognized national expertise in medication error prevention) Guidelines for Optimizing Safe Subcutaneous Insulin Use in Adults, it indicated, A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician prescribed thickened liquid for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 51). This failure put Resident 51 at risk for aspiration (food or liquid going into the lungs) that could compromise his health condition, and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 51's clinical record indicated, Resident 51 had a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain cells to die off), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids). Review of Resident 51's physician order, dated 10/20/22, indicated pureed (cooked foods blended to the consistency of pudding or baby food so little or no chewing is necessary) texture diet and nectar thick liquids (liquids thicker than water, mildly thickened liquids to help those with difficulty swallowing regular consistency liquids). An observation during lunch in Resident 51's room on 11/10/22 at 12:22 p.m., noted certified nursing assistant O (CNA O) fed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two garbage disposal dumpster container lid was closed. This failure had the potential for harborage and feeding of pests. Findings: During facility's garbage disposal site inspection with the kitchen supervisor (KS) on 11/8/22, at 9:45 a.m., noted one garbage disposal dumpster container, and one recycle disposal dumpster container inside gated area located outside by the facility's parking lot, behind the kitchen. Observed garbage disposal dumpster container with bag of trash inside, and one of the lid was open. The KS stated lid was left open, and the KS closed the lid. During an interview with the KS on 11/8/22, at 9:45 a.m., the KS stated lid should be closed all the times to prevent pest problem. During an interview with registered dietitian J (RD J) on 11/9/22, at 9:49 a.m., RD J stated garbage disposal dumpster lid should always be closed. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Miscellaneous areas dated 2020, Indicated Garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5 percent (%), as evidenced by the identification of eight medication errors out of 29 opportunities, to yield a facility medication error rate of 27.59%: 1. For Resident 188, four medications were not given. 2. For Resident 67, the physician's order was not followed. 3. For Resident 26, three medication dosages were not fully given as prescribed. These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' medical health and safety. Findings: 1. For Resident 188, four medications were not given. During a review of Resident 188's admission Records dated 1/17/2020, indicated Resident 188 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of epilepsy (a neurological disorder that causes seizures or unusual sensations and behaviors), atrial fibrillation (a disease of the heart characterized by irregular and often faster heartbeat), hypertension (high blood pressure) and presence of cardiac pacemaker (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy and procedure related to medication storage when: 1. Three out of four nursing station refrigerators were not being monitored accordingly when storing vaccines. 2. Expired Medications 3. Two licensed nurses left medication unattended. These deficient practices put resident's health and safety at risk. Findings: 1. Three out of four nursing station refrigerators were not being monitored accordingly when storing vaccines. During an observation at station one's medication refrigerator with the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on 1/14/2020 at 3:04 p.m., the ADON confirmed Afluria (flu vaccine) was stored inside the refrigerator while the facility staff was only monitoring temperature once a day. During an observation at station two's medication refrigerator with the ADON on 1/14/2020 at 3:25 p.m., the ADON confirmed two Afluria and one Prevnar (vaccine used to prevent infection caused by pneumococcal bacteria) was stored inside the refrigerator while the facility staff was only monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 41 and 59) and in two of two hallways. This failure resulted in the residents' discomfort and had the potential for all residents to be uncomfortable in the hallways. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/14/2020 at 2:45 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was at Resident 59's bedside, and Resident 59 stated she was cold. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/15/2020 at 2:10 p.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DOM), in Nursing Station (NS) A, the DOM was observed using the temperature gun to check the temperature in Resident 59's room. The temperature gun readings indicated a range of 69 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/16/2020 at 1:33 p.m. with the DOM, in NS A and NS B, the DOM was observed using the temperature gun to check the hallway temperatures and the readings were 69 degrees Fahrenheit in each hallway. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as prescribed for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 59 and 134) when: 1. For Resident 59, the licensed nurse did not administer the prescribed PRN (as needed) cough medicine when the resident was coughing. 2. For Resident 134, the licensed nurse did not administer the prescribed PRN pain medications for the pain levels indicated on the physician's orders. This failure had the potential to cause discomfort and delay treatment for the residents. 1. During an observation and interview on 1/14/2020 at 2:45 p.m., Resident 59 was observed, in bed, with a wet cough (a type of cough that results from the mucus in the airways). Resident 59 stated she wasn't getting medicine for the cough. During a record review of Resident 59's Physicians Orders, dated 1/3/2020, the orders indicated to administer Geri-Tussin Syrup (guaifenesin) (cough medicine used to reduce chest congestion by breaking up mucus so it can be coughed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide communication tools and services for two out of three residents (10 and 26) with communication barriers when: 1. For Resident 10, the facility staff were unable to establish communication and did not implement the use of a communication board (A communication tool that includes words, phrases, and/or pictures in a foreign language and English used to facilitate communication for people with language barriers) as indicated in the care plan. 2. For Resident 26, the facility did not ensure that communication can always be established through a translator, as indicated in the care plan, or other tool, in the absence of a translator. These failures resulted in Resident 10's frustration and had the potential to impact both residents' abilities to communicate their needs and delay treatment. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's Physician's Progress Note, dated 6/15/19, the note indicated Unable to talk to patient. No translator available .Please call our office to R/S [reschedule]. During a record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 18 Residents (44) received care and services by failing to provide medication as prescribed. This failure put Resident 44's health and safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, dated 1/16/2020, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, occurs when stomach acid frequently flows back into the tube (esophagus) connecting mouth and stomach), nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis (narrowing of the heart's valve), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of progressive lung disorders characterized by increasing breathlessness ) and acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (is a condition when the heart is not able to fill properly with blood, reducing the amount of blood pumped in the body). During a review of Resident 44's General Acute Care's Discharge -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview record reviews the facility failed to follow pharmacy services policies and procedure when: 1. For Resident 188, new medication orders were not delivered on a timely manner. 2. For Residents 134 and Resident 31, the facility failed to ensure accurate or effective accountability of controlled substances (drugs with high potential for abuse or addiction). 3. Nurse's station one had two of the same emergency kits. These failures caused delayed in treatment and potential to put resident's health and safety at risk. Findings: 1. For Resident 188, new medication orders were not delivered on a timely manner. During an interview on 1/13/2020 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 188's family member stated Resident 188 was admitted on [DATE] but the facility nurses were still not able to administer morning medications. During an interview on 1/13/2020 at 10:33 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A), LVN A confirmed that four medications were still not delivered from the pharmacy for Resident 188.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (4) were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activity) when psychiatry recommendations were not acted on timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission records, dated 1/16/2020, indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE], started hospice care on 4/11/19, with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of pancreas and prostate, psychosis (a mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality), dementia (problems with memory and thinking) and high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 4's physician's order, dated 8/20/19, indicated Seroquel (an anti-psychotic medication used to treat certain mood and mental conditions) 100 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement) twice a day for psychosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms (Rooms 150, 151, 152, 153, 156, 160, and 163) measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive in the facility. Findings: The room measurements indicated seven resident rooms were less than 80 square feet per resident. Room Number of Beds Square feet/Resident 150 2 71.5 151 2 71.5 152 2 78 153 2 78 156 2 71.5 160 2 78 163 2 71.5 During the survey, residents were observed in their rooms. Nursing care and services were not impacted by the shortage of space. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and the staff stated the square footage of the rooms was not a concern. Continuance of the room waiver is recommended.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms (Rooms 150, 151, 152, 153, 156, 160, and 163) measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive in the facility. Findings: The room measurements indicated seven resident rooms were less than 80 square feet per resident. Room Number of Beds Square feet/Resident 150 2 71.5 151 2 71.5 152 2 78 153 2 78 156 2 71.5 160 2 78 163 2 71.5 None of the rooms were observed to inhibit the staff from providing care or the residents from receiving adequate care. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and the staff stated the square footage of the rooms was not a concern. Continuance of the room waiver is recommended.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2020-01-17 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms (Rooms 150, 151, 152, 153, 156, 160, and 163) measured at least 80 square feet per resident. Having less than 80 square feet per resident could potentially compromise the care and services the residents receive in the facility. Findings: The room measurements indicated seven resident rooms were less than 80 square feet per resident. Room Number of Beds Square feet/Resident 150 2 71.5 151 2 71.5 152 2 78 153 2 78 156 2 71.5 160 2 78 163 2 71.5 None of the rooms were observed to inhibit the staff from providing care or the residents from receiving adequate care. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and the staff stated the square footage of the rooms was not a concern. Continuance of the room waiver is recommended.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$40,323 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $32,292 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
  • $8,031 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/31/2018
CLAWSON, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER48%since 08/31/2018
WILLIAMS, RYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL48%since 08/31/2018
TEXAS CAPITAL BANK NAOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/17/2025
CHEN, KAI SHINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/04/2021
FIELDS, DOMONIQUEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/12/2019
FLAKE, ETHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/07/2024
HINKLE, CORTNEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/09/2024
MODI, ISHANKUMARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/04/2019
MOSHER, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/08/2024
MURRAY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2024
SOARES, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2021
JONES, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
DE OCAMPO, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/02/2022
DUENAS, JOSEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/02/2018
FRANCO, LIONEL RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/08/2024
GANDHI, KAVITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
HAGGERTY, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
LIMOSNERO, ANALIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/08/2024
LOPEZ, ELOYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2021
RENALDO, MARIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/23/2022
TUCKER, RILEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 51%Medicare 30%Other / private 19%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$569per resident / day
operating cost
$17,302per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$634per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055435. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next