Bellevue Post Acute
2424 156th Avenue Northeast, Bellevue, WA 98007 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (425) 641-1166 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.3% | 17.7% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.2% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 2.6% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.7% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.2% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.8% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 513 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 241 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.1%CMS range 66.7–73.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.5–11.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 3.9%CMS range 2.4–5.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal vital signs (measurements of the body's most basic functions [temperature, blood pressure]) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk for unrecognized medical complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Acute Condition Changes - Clinical Protocol, revised in March 2018 showed, The physician will help identify individuals with a significant risk for having acute changes of condition during their stay; for example.someone with unstable vital signs. The policy further showed, Direct care staff, including nursing assistants will be trained in recognizing subtle but significant changes in the resident.and how to communicate these changes to the Nurse.Review of Resident 1's May 2026 temperature log showed the following temperatures, which indicated hypothermia (a condition that occurs when the body temperature drops below 95.0 Fahrenheit [ F -temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate infection surveillance for 5 of 6 months (July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025 & November 2025), reviewed for infection control. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization of vital sign (measurements of the body's essential functions) equipment were conducted by 1 of 2 staff (Staff Y), reviewed for medical equipment use, and failed to clean insulin (a medication that helps regulate blood sugar levels) pens (device used to inject insulin) prior to administration for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4), reviewed for insulin administration. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.CLEANING OF INSULIN PENSRESIDENT 4Review of the manufacturer's recommendations titled, Insulin Aspart (rapid-acting insulin) Injection, revised in February 2023, showed, Pull of the pen cap. Wipe the rubber stopper with an alcohol swab. Remove the protective tab from a disposable needle. Screw the needle tightly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-10 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified staff person to serve as an Infection Preventionist (IP) to oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program. This failure placed the residents, staff, and visitors at risk for unmet infection control issues and lack of oversite of infection control practices.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised in October 2018, showed that The infection prevention and control program is coordinated and overseen by an infection prevention specialist (infection preventionist), or designee.In an interview on 01/05/2026 at 9:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that the facility did not currently have an IP and that Staff B, Director of Nursing, was responsible and was not certified.In an interview on 01/09/2026 at 1:48 PM, Staff B stated that they were responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Staff B stated that they did not have specialized training in infection prevention and control and were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when residents were served their meals on trays for 1 of 1 dining room (First Floor Dining Room), reviewed for dining observations. This failure placed the residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised in February 2021, showed, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. The policy further showed, The facility staff and management minimizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a depersonalized, institutional setting.Observation of the First Floor Dining Room on 01/05/2026 at 11:50 AM, showed Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), took a tray from a metal cart and served it to Resident 78. Staff V removed the cover from the plate and left the tray on the table. Staff U, CNA, took a tray from a metal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu/meal tickets were followed for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 35, 27 & 32), reviewed for food services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs, potential negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Nutrition Services, revised in October 2017, showed, Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The policy further showed, If an incorrect meal is provided to a resident, or a meal does not appear palatable, nursing staff will report it to the Food Service Manager so that a new food tray can be issued. RESIDENT 35On 01/06/2026 at 9:33 AM, Resident 35 stated that the dietary staff did not follow their menu/meal ticket. Resident 35 stated that they were supposed to get fruit but didn't [did not] get any. On 01/08/2026 at 8:31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 1 of 6 Staff (Staff D), 1 of 1 Dry Storage Room, and 2 of 4 Refrigerators (Kitchen Walk-in Refrigerator & First Floor Food Refrigerator), reviewed for food services. The failure to perform hand hygiene, label and discard food items past the use by/best by date, placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness – Food Handling, revised in July 2014, showed, Food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the risk of foodborne illness is minimized. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised in November 2022, showed, Dry foods that are stored in bins are removed from original packaging, labeled and dated (use by date). The policy showed, All foods stored in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-10 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that included the Infection Preventionist (IP), to conduct required Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) and QAA activities. This failure minimized the effectiveness of the interdisciplinary QAA team's ability to identify processes and outcomes related to infection control practices and disease management.Findings included .Review of the document provided by the facility on 01/05/2026 titled, QAA Committee Information, showed the committee met on a weekly basis in the facility conference room and consisted of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director, Social Services Director, Case Manager, Therapy Consultant, Charge Nurse, MDS (Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool) Director, Registered Dietitian, and Dietary Director. The document did not show that an IP was included in the QAA committee. Review of the facility's QAPI agenda/minutes dated 11/19/2025, showed a QAPI meeting was held. The minutes did not show that an IP attended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently follow an established Antibiotic (antimicrobial substance/medication to treat/prevent infections) Stewardship Program (to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics) and complete monthly surveillance for 5 of 6 months (July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025 & November 2025), reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate antibiotic use were followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 3), reviewed for unnecessary medication. These failures placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate/unnecessary use of antibiotics and an increased risk for multi-drug-resistant organisms (microscopic organisms that are resistant to many antibiotics).Findings included. MONTHLY SURVEILLANCEReview of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, revised in December 2016, showed, The purpose of our Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had the required 12 hours of training, and/or include abuse/neglect, and dementia (memory loss) management training annually for 3 of 6 staff (Staff M, S & T), reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes.Findings included.Review of the facility's assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents), updated on 10/14/2025, showed, Required in-service training for nurse aides. In service training must: Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year. Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training.STAFF MReview of the undated facility's employee record for Staff M, CNA, showed they were hired on 06/19/2023. It further showed no documentation that Staff M received the required 12 hours of annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) before the Medicare (federal health insurance program) coverage ended for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 90), reviewed for beneficiary notification. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed and losing their right to an appeals process.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices, revised in September 2022, showed residents would be informed in advance when changes would occur to their bills. The policy further showed that if the director of admissions or benefits coordinator believed that Medicare would not pay for an otherwise covered skilled service, the resident or representative would be notified in writing why the service(s) may not be covered and the resident's potential liability for payment of the non-covered service(s).Review of the SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form received on 01/07/2026 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 45), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions.Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2024, showed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are thoroughly investigated. The policy showed any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. The policy further showed the individual conducting the investigation at a minimum would interview the resident (as medically appropriate) or the resident's representative, staff members who had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident, and other residents to whom the accused employee provided care or services for.Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice as required for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 6 & 64), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their protection of resident rights during transfers, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised in March 2021, showed residents and/or representatives are notified in writing and in a language and format they understand, at least thirty days prior to a transfer or discharge. The policy showed under certain circumstances, the notice would be given as soon as practicable but before the transfer or discharge. The policy further showed the resident and representative would be notified in writing the specific reason, date, location for the transfer/discharge, an explanation of the resident's rights to appeal, and contact information for the Office of the State Long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was completed timely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 9), reviewed for significant change in condition. The failure to complete a SCSA timely placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed that a SCSA is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice (compassionate care provided to individuals who are in the final stages of a terminal illness) program or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD - observation period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS and ends at 11:59…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 16 residents (Residents 9 & 19), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments were coded on the MDS regarding injections and prognosis (an estimate about whether a patient [resident] will recover from an illness) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Level II (or Level 2) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR - an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or Related Conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) referral was made for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 19), reviewed for PASRR screening. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, showed, All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. The facility conducts a Level I [or Level 1] PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR-an assessment used to identify people [residents] referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual disabilities, or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long term care) Coordinator after a significant change in status occurred for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 9), reviewed for PASRR screening. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, showed, All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. The facility conducts a Level I [or Level 1] PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident taking a diuretic (medication used to help remove extra fluid from the body) medication and failed to notify the provider of weight gain for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for unrecognized weight gain, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of a physician note dated 09/30/2025 showed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included Chronic Heart Failure (CHF-a condition where the heart muscle cannot pump blood efficiently, causing fluid back up in the lungs).Review of Resident 5's physician orders printed on 01/06/2026, showed an order for furosemide (a diuretic medication) for fluid retention. It further showed an order to weigh the resident daily and to call the cardiologist [a doctor specializing in treating heart conditions] if the resident gained three pounds (lbs. -a unit of measurement) in 24 hours or five lbs. in a week.Review of Resident 5's CHF care plan, initiated on 05/08/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of 1 of 6 residents (Resident 15), reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to administer medication in accordance with professional standards of practice placed the resident at risk for negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised in February 2023, showed, multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g. [example], needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. The policy further showed, If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items.Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in [DATE], showed, The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Review (MRR- a comprehensive assessment of resident's medications, performed by a pharmacist [a qualified professional to provide expert advice on medication management, safety, and regulatory compliance]) recommendations were completed accurately and in a timely manner for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 15 & 5), reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for experiencing adverse side effects, receiving unnecessary medications, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, revised on 03/02/2020, showed, Facility should encourage Physician/Prescriber or other Responsible Parties receiving the MRR and the Director of Nursing to act upon the recommendations contained in the MRR. The policy further showed, If an irregularity does not require urgent action but should be addressed before the consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders with parameters were followed when administering medications for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 5 & 19), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for side-effects related to the medications, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, showed, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medications errors are documented, reported, and reviewed by the QAPI [Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement] committee to inform process changes and or the need for additional staff training. It further showed to check and verify vital signs (measurements of the body's essential functions) if necessary, prior to administering medications. RESIDENT 5BLOOD SUGAR MONITORING AND INSULIN ADMINISTRATIONReview of Resident 5's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and/or biologicals were discarded when expired for 1 of 2 medication carts (Team-One Second Floor Medication Cart), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving compromised medications and related complications.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised in February 2023, showed, multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g. [example], needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. The policy further showed, If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items.Review of the online manufacturer's recommendations titled, Insulin [medication that regulates sugar in the blood] Lispro Kwikpen [or Humalog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 15), reviewed for rehabilitation services. This failure placed the resident at risk for decline in function, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Scheduling Therapy Services, revised in July 2013, showed, Therapy Services shall be scheduled in accordance with the resident's treatment plan.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 10/24/2025, showed that Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and that they were cognitively intact.On 01/06/2026 at 12:25 PM, Resident 15 stated that the last time they received Physical Therapy (PT) was two weeks ago.Review of Resident 15's physician's orders showed an order PT/OT [Occupational Therapy] to eval [evaluate] and treat. Partial WBAT [partial weight bearing as tolerated] with an order date of 12/04/2025.Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccine was offered to 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for immunizations. The failure to educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccination placed the resident at risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus and related complications.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Vaccination of Residents, revised in June 2022, showed that Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been immunized. It showed that Vaccine recommendations and schedules are consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Review of the CDC online document titled, Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines, dated 11/19/2025, recommended a 2025-2026 COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and/or their representative and failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes who protect and promote resident rights under federal and state law and regulations), describing the reason for transfer/discharge for 1 of 2 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for discharges. These failures placed the resident at risk for not having opportunities to make informed decisions about transfer/discharge.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Notice, revised in March 2021, showed that Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand. It showed that the resident and/or representative are notified of the specific reason for the transfer or discharge, date of the transfer or discharge, the location of where they are being transferred or discharged , and an explanation of the resident's rights to appeal the transfer or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and accurately assess risk of elopement for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for elopement, falls, and injury.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Wandering and Elopements, revised in September 2022, showed, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 07/21/2025, showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment with brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement). It further showed in Section E (Behavior), that Resident 1 wandered 1 [one] to 3 [three] days during the seven-day look back period.Review of the Electronic Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed and implemented abuse and neglect policies and procedures for the protection of residents during an abuse investigation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse allegations. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated November 2017, showed, the administration/designee will: Protect our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies, family members, legal representatives, friends, visitors, or any other individual and develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. The policy showed the investigation would identify and interview all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure local law enforcement was notified for reasonable suspicion of abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk for lack of protection from potential abuse and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition, showed that incidents involving staff-to-resident concerns must be reported to law enforcement. It further showed that circumstances where findings were made against licensed, certified, or registered health care workers the State Department of Health must be notified. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated November 2017, showed, All alleged violations involving abuse .will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies, as applicable and per Washington State and federal regulations .law enforcement officials. Review of a grievance form dated 02/13/2025, showed Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information postings were posted in prominent locations for 1 of 2 floors (Second Floor), reviewed for Nurse Staffing Information. This failure placed residents and visitors at risk for not being fully informed of current nurse staffing levels and resident census information. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated August 2018, showed that within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of Licensed Nurses and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel directly responsible for patient care will be posted in prominent location (accessible to patients and visitors) and in a clear and readable format. Observations on 10/10/2024 at 2:01 PM, on 10/11/2024 at 9:30 AM, on 10/14/2024 at 10:50 AM, on 10/15/2024 at 11:07 AM, and on 10/16/2024 at 8:06 AM, showed the nurse staffing information was posted on the first floor by the administration office. Observations on 10/14/2024 at 10:55 AM, on 10/15/2024 at 11:12 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, for 4 of 5 staff (Staff O, P, Q & C), and for 2 of 2 floors (First Floor and Second Floor), reviewed for food services. The failure to date and discard food items, perform hand hygiene, use appropriate hair covering and ensure food items were covered during meal delivery placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated July 2018, showed, All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). Review of the undated online document titled, Washington State Food Worker Manual, showed to wash your hands after you enter the kitchen and handle garbage, dirty dishes, money, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey result binder included the results for 1 of 2 years (2021) recertification and complaint surveys that resulted in citations. In addition, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of survey reports in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. These failures prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of corrections. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Rights and Responsibilities, showed that resident has the right to examine the facility's latest survey inspection results. During a residents' meeting on 10/11/2024 at 1:41 PM, Resident 2 and Resident 16 who routinely attended residents monthly meeting, stated they were not aware of the availability of survey reports. Observation of the first and second floor on 10/11/2024 at 1:55 PM, showed there was no posting or notice to show the availability of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan and/or provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the residents and/or their representatives for 5 of 10 residents (Residents 94, 194, 15, 20 & 5), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, dated June 2018, showed that a baseline plan of care to meet the patient's immediate needs shall be developed for each patient within forty-eight hours of admission. It further showed, the patient and their presentative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan. RESIDENT 94 Review of the admission record printed on 10/16/2024, showed Resident 94 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the form titled, Patient [resident] Baseline Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 09/28/2024, showed that it was not marked for Patient and/or representative were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 4 of 20 residents (Residents 23, 193, 9 & 29), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop care plans for tilt in space wheelchair (a wheelchair that has reclining function) and Self-Administration of Medications, and the failure to implement dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) care plan placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, related complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated August 2018, showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetable to meet the patient's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Review of the facility's policy titled, Assistive Devices and Equipment, dated August 2018, showed that recommendations for the use of devices and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hallway carpet was safe for 1 of 2 floors (First Floor Hallway) and failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 29), reviewed for accident/hazards. These failures placed the residents at risk for accidents, injury, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . FIRST FLOOR HALLWAYS Review of the facility's assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents), updated 06/14/2024, showed that the majority of our patients [residents] are short term and receive rehabilitative services. Observation on 10/11/2024 at 8:38 AM, showed multiple areas of bubbling [an area in the carpet where it lifts and creates a hill or bump in the floor] in the carpet in the first-floor hallways. It further showed one large area of bubbling in the hallway of room [ROOM NUMBER] to 143. Observations on 10/11/2024 at 1:58 PM and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed timely and drugs were properly labeled and stored in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (First Floor Team 1 & Team 2), reviewed for medication storage and labeling. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated August 2018, showed, The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. FIRST FLOOR TEAM 1 MEDICATION CART A joint observation of the first floor Team 1 medication cart on 10/15/2024 at 1:32 PM, with Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse, showed the following medications stored in the cart: - An open bottle of Senna plus (a stool softener) tablets, expired in September 2024. - An open bottle of Iron (a supplement) 27 milligram (mg) tablets, expired in April 2024. - An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was managed in a manner that utilized its resources to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The failure to properly maintain the carpet placed the residents at risk for accidents, injuries, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents), updated 06/14/2024, showed that the majority of our patients are short term and receive rehabilitative services. It further showed that the facility assessment was used to assess facility resources needed to provide competent care for our residents including .physical environment and building needs. Observation on 10/11/2024 at 8:38 AM, showed multiple areas of bubbling [an area in the carpet where it lifts and creates a hill or bump on the floor] in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices and/or proper use of gloves were followed before, during, and after resident care and passing meal trays for 2 of 6 staff (Staff K & G), failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from Multidrug-Resistant Organism [MDRO-a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 37, 193 & 5), and failed to ensure appropriate indwelling catheter (a semi-flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 37), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included . HAND HYGIENE/GLOVE USE Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated July 2018, showed that all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or their resident representative before administering psychotropic (mind-altering) medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications prior to administration. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Drug Utilization, last updated in November 2017, showed, In the event a psychoactive [mind-altering] medication is indicated in the plan of care, licensed staff will obtain informed consent for the use of the medication. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/25/2024 showed Resident 5 had moderately impaired cognition and received an antidepressant (medication for depression). Review of the order summary report as of 10/15/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated, assessed, and obtained a physician order for safe administration of medications for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 193 & 34), reviewed for self-medication administration. The failure to complete a self-administration of medication assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse medication interactions, and complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated August 2018 showed the following: 1. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner may assess the patient's [resident's] mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the patient. 2. In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, including (but not limited to) the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse was reported to the State Agency as required for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7), reviewed for abuse allegations. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated November 2017, showed, All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies, as applicable and per Washington State and federal regulations .State Agency. It further showed, it will be reported immediately, but no later than twenty-four (24) hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse and has not resulted in serious injury. According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated in October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an abuse allegation and failed to ensure the abuse allegation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated November 2017, showed, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation investigations will also be reported. Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, All alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and/or their representatives and failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocacy group for residents), describing the reason for transfer/discharge for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 25), reviewed for hospitalization. These failures placed the resident at risk for not having opportunities to make informed decisions about transfer/discharge. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfers and Discharge Notices, dated June 2018, showed that the patient and/or representative will be notified in writing and the notice will be given as soon as it is practicable when an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the patient's urgent needs. In addition, it showed that a copy of the notice will be sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/05/2024, showed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 30), reviewed for discharge assessments. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), Version 1.19.1, revised in October 2024, showed discharge (non-comprehensive) Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessments must be completed no later than 14 days after the discharge date (discharge date plus 14 days), and it must be submitted/transmitted within 14 days of the MDS completion date (Z0500 plus 14 days) to the database as required. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 06/30/2024, showed Resident 30 discharged to a community. Review of Resident 30's MDS schedule in their electronic health record on 10/09/2024 did not show that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 21 residents (Residents 5 & 40), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding bladder continence and discharge status placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or significant other as appropriate or acceptable. It is important to note here that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR-an assessment to ensure individuals with Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) had the required Level II referral sent if residents had a positive Level I PASARR, or corrected/updated the resident's PASARR as needed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 25), reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the resident at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the Department of Social and Health Services, Dear Nursing Home Administrator Letter, guidance titled, Clarification to the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR) Level I Screening Process, dated 07/06/2024 and amended on 08/23/2024, showed a positive Level I PASARR screen (that would then require a referral for a Level II PASARR) was if Any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct care conferences for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 37 & 193), reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for not having input regarding care goals, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings including . Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient [resident] Care Conferences-Social Services Procedures, dated June 2018, showed, After admission, an initial care conference will be scheduled by Social Services with the patient and responsible party (if the patient chooses) to be held within 7 [seven] days. The initial care conference is completed only for the first admission .The initial care conference will be documented on the Patient Care Conference form located in Point Click Care [Electronic Health Record (EHR)]). RESIDENT 37 Review of the admission record printed on 10/11/2024, showed Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's EHR (under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 licensed staff (Staff T) followed professional standards for proper insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of sugar) administration, and ensure medications were not left unattended for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 10), reviewed for medication administration. In addition, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were checked prior to blood pressure medication administration for 1 of 5 resident (Resident 25), reviewed for unnecessary medication. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care need, adverse effects and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION According to the KwikPen (insulin pen) manufacturer's instruction, revised in July 2023 and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, priming insulin pen means removing the air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the insulin pen is working…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with nail care and wheelchair transfer for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 20), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased self-esteem, decline in mobility and function, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated February 2018, showed, Patients [residents] who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes (a disease that occurs when the body can not properly regulate blood sugar levels), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 10/07/2024, showed Resident 20 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for significant weight gain and use of diuretic medication (that helps to reduce fluid buildup in the body) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 20), reviewed for quality of care. In addition, the facility failed to implement the bowel management protocol when indicated for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 9), reviewed for bowel management. These failures placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs, medical complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 20 Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should, and blood often backs up and causes fluid to build up in the lungs and in the legs). Review of the October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 20 had an order for Torsemide (a drug used to treat edema [swelling] and excess fluid held in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were consistently provided to increase Range of Motion (ROM) and/or to prevent decrease in ROM for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 145), reviewed for restorative services. This failure placed the resident at risk for a decline in ROM, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Mobility and Range of Motion, dated August 2018, showed patients [residents] with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in ROM. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 07/19/2024, showed Resident 145 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. It further showed that Resident 145 had limited ROM in their upper extremity on one side. Review of the mobility care plan revised on 09/13/2024, showed Resident 145 was on a restorative program. Review of the facility's document titled, Nursing Rehab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label/date and properly store nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medication into a mist that can be inhaled to treat respiratory conditions) treatment set for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 193), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the resident at risk for respiratory infections and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Administering Medication through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, dated August 2018, directed staff to change the equipment and tubing every seven days. Resident 193 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a common lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe). Review of the order summary report as of 10/11/2024, showed Resident 193 had an order for Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution (a breathing treatment used to prevent and treat wheezing and shortness of breath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan and interventions to address dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) care needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 25), reviewed for dementia care. This failure placed the resident at risk for having unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dementia-Clinical Pathway, dated June 2018, showed that for the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will identify a patient [resident]-centered plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 08/13/2024, showed Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia. Review of Resident 25's comprehensive care plan, printed on 10/10/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medication for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 20 & 25), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for side-effects related to the medications, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 20 Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/07/2024, showed Resident 20 had intact cognition and was on PRN (as needed) pain medication. A review of the October 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed Resident 20 had an order for oxycodone (an opioid drug used to treat moderate to severe pain) 2.5 milligram every four hours PRN for severe pain rated 7 to10 on the pain scale 1 to 10. Further review of the MAR showed Resident 20 received oxycodone for pain level less than 7 on the following days: - On 10/02/2024 for pain level 5 - On 10/03/2024 for pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident was free of unnecessary psychotropic (a drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to ensure licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) and physician recommendations were carried out in a timely manner placed the resident at increased risk for receiving medications they no longer needed, adverse side effects, and negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, revised on 03/14/2019, showed that a designated facility staff member should monitor for weekly reports to ensure recommendations are completed in a timely manner and prior to patient discharge. Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/25/2024 showed Resident 5 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had the required twelve hours of training, including dementia (memory loss) management training annually for 1 of 5 staff (Staff N). This failure placed the residents at risk for potential negative outcomes and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's assessment, updated on 06/14/2024, showed Required in-service training for nurse aides [will] be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides, but must be no less than 12 hours per year. It further showed that all staff will be required to complete Care/management for persons with dementia, annually. Review of the facility's employee record for Staff N, CNA, showed they were hired on 01/09/2023. It further showed no documentation that Staff N received the required 12 hours of annual training, including dementia management training. In an interview and joint record review on 10/17/2024 at 12:40 PM, Staff E, Staff Development, stated that CNAs needed 12 hours of training yearly. A joint record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding active diagnosis placed the resident at risk for unidentified or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed Accuracy of Assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate RAI (i.e., comprehensive, quarterly, annual, significant change in status). It further showed Urinary Tract Infection (UTI - bladder infection) has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. The failure to ensure disinfecting wipes were stored properly placed the residents at risk for allergic reaction, injury, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's incident report dated 02/19/2024, showed Resident 1 complained of burning on their throat and was observed holding wipes in their hands. The wipes that Resident 1 was holding were Microdot Minute Wipes [a pre-soaked disinfectant (a substance that destroys bacteria, fungi, virus)]. He [the resident] also had 2 [two] packages of regular bed bath wipes (cleansing wipes [safe for body use]) in drawer. Patient [resident] reported he had pulled them from his drawer at bedside and had washed his face and neck with them. Immediately staff had got him up into W/C [wheelchair] and over the sink, removing his shirt and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 1 Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 11/26/2023, showed Resident 1 required partial assistance (helper does less than half the effort) to shower/bathe self. Review of the ADL care plan initiated on 11/21/2023, showed Resident 1 had self-care deficit for bathing related to decreased mobility and weakness. Review of the facility's form titled, Documentation Survey Report for November 2023 showed Resident 1 received one shower on 11/29/2023 during their 12 days stay at the facility. In a joint record review and interview on 02/07/2024 at 1:48 PM with Staff C, MDS Nurse, showed Resident 1 had no refusals with showers. Staff C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pain management was provided pain medications for severe (7 to 10 pain scale) pain. Resident 1, who experienced severe and unrelieved pain during the first 12 hours of their admission when the prescribed pain medication and/or effective alternative to relieve severe pain was not provided. This failure placed the resident at risk for uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included multiple pelvic (bony structure at the lower part of the trunk) fractures (break in a bone). Review of Resident 1's admission pain assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident had postoperative (post-surgery) pain intensity of seven out of 10 (7/10). Resident 1's pain was frequent, limited their day-to-day activities and made their concentration difficult. Further review of the pain assessment showed that one of the plans for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify law enforcement for an allegation of potential abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse, potential ongoing abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Washington State Reporting Guidelines for Nursing Homes (Purple Book) Book) dated October 2015, stated that sexual abuse means any form of nonconsensual sexual contact (such as, staff asking resident for sexual touching, kissing, intimate hugging, & dating) between a staff person of a facility and a vulnerable adult living in that facility whether or not it is consensual. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 08/18/2023 showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Review of the clinical progress note dated 10/23/2023, showed Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, documented that Resident 1 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide abuse and neglect training for 1 of 1 staff (Staff C), reviewed for required staff training. This failed practice had the potential of not identifying and preventing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant was hired on 04/19/2022. Review of the facility's employee record showed abuse and neglect training were not provided upon hire and annually. On 11/02/2023 at 1:52 PM, Staff C stated that they did not remember if they had abuse and neglect training during their first year of hire. On 11/02/2023 at 2:49 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated that Staff C received their yearly abuse and/or neglect training. Staff B checked their records and stated that they were unable to find Staff C's annual abuse and neglect training. On 11/02/2023 at 3:07 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they were unable to find Staff C's abuse and neglect training. Reference: (WAC) 388-97-1680 (2)(b) .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME]-[NAME], Glen Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 5 of 15 residents (Residents 15, 12, 680, 129 and 26) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding the use of a walker, dental, diagnoses, vision, and discharge (DC) placed the residents at risk for unidentified or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019: Accuracy of Assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate RAI (i.e., comprehensive, quarterly, annual, significant change in status). The Observation Period (also known as the Look-back period) is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the kitchen were labeled/dated when first opened and food products discarded on or before use by date. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . FOOD ITEMS IN THE DAIRY REFRIGERATOR On 07/10/2023 at 8:27 AM, during an observation and interview on with Staff J, Kitchen Manager, showed the dairy refrigerator had a clear plastic container of red jelly that was undated and unlabeled. Staff J stated that the container of jelly should have been labeled and dated. FOOD ITEMS IN THE WALK-IN FREEZER On 07/10/2023 at 8:42 AM, another observation and interview on with Staff J, showed the walk-in freezer had one box of unopened beef taquitos with a use by date of 09/20/2022. Staff J stated that the food item should have been should have been thrown away. Reference: (WAC) 388-97-1100 (3) .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or the resident representative before administering psychotropic (mind altering) medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 680) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident and/or resident representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about their medication. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Drug Utilization, updated in November 2017, showed that in the event a psychoactive [affecting the mind] medication is indicated in the plan of care, licensed staff will obtain informed consent for the use of the medication. Resident 680 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of depression (a mental disorder that can cause persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, low self-esteem and other emotional or physical problems). Review of the June 2023 and July 2023 Medication Administration Record showed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold notice was provided at the time of transfer for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 681) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Holds and Returns, dated June 2018, showed that prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, patients or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold policy and return policy. Resident 681 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 681's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 681 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of Resident 681's EHR showed no indication that a written bed hold notification was provided to Resident 681 or their representative. On 07/14/2023 at 11:07 AM, a joint record review with Staff F, Resident Care Manager, did not show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure continuity of care and/or to ensure a summary/copy of the baseline care plan was provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 629 & 129) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure resulted in the residents not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care services and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans - Baseline, dated June 2018, showed that the baseline plan of care shall be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission to assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained. It also showed that the resident, and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan. RESIDENT 629 Resident 629 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 07/12/2023 at 4:57 PM, Resident 629 stated that they did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for nutrition, and 2 of 5 residents (Residents 679 & 680) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated August 2018, showed that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan will describe services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the patient's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and describe services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment. Additionally, it showed that the care plan will incorporate risk factors associated with identified problem. RESIDENT 14 Resident 14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were maintained, revised, and updated for 1 of 11 residents (Resident 11) whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated August 2018, showed that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the patient's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each patient. It also showed assessments of patients are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the patients and the patients' conditions change. RESIDENT 11 Resident 11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior). Review of Resident 11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice to ensure pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) and physician order parameters were followed for Atenolol (a medication to treat Hypertension [high blood pressure]) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 licensed staff (Staff G) observed for medication administration follow medication administration practices. These failures placed the resident at risk for potential negative outcomes and possible medication error. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated August 2018, showed that medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame and the individual administering the medication must sign the patient's Medication Administration Record (MAR) after giving medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Consultant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 26) who chose to leave the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). This failure placed the resident at increased risk for hospital readmission, infection, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharging Against Medical Advice, revised in June 2018, showed that should a patient (resident), or their representative require an immediate discharge, the patient's attending physician will be promptly notified. RESIDENT 26 Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of failure to thrive and Fibromyalgia (chronic pain). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 04/22/2023 showed that Resident 26 had two stage 2 (partial thickness loss) bed sores to bilateral (both) buttocks. Review of Resident 26's clinical record showed that they discharged home AMA on 04/22/2023, but no documentation that risks and benefits…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care and treatment were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility staff failed to follow physician bowel medication orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for discomfort or bowel impaction and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Resident 11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with history of constipation. Review of Resident 11's clinical notes showed that Resident 11 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] for constipation not improved with medications. Review of Resident 11's bowel record for June 2023 showed that the resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) from 06/18/2023 to 06/25/2023 (total 8 days). Review of the June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the following as needed (PRN) orders: -Bisacodyl Laxative Suppository 10 milligrams, insert 1 suppository rectally every 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-10 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey result binder included the results for 4 of 8 complaint surveys (08/12/2025, 09/16/2025, 10/14/2025 & 12/09/2025) that resulted in citations since the last annual survey. This failure prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of correction.Findings included.Review of the state inspection survey results binder on 01/07/2026 at 8:36 AM and at 1:35 PM and on 01/10/2026 at 10:12 AM, showed that it did not include the results for the complaint surveys and plan of corrections from 08/12/2025, 09/16/2025, 10/14/2025, and 12/09/2025.In an interview and joint record review on 01/10/2026 at 1:54 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they expected the survey results binder to include annual surveys and any complaints that occur. Joint record review of the survey binder showed the following complaint surveys results and associated plans of corrections were missing for 08/12/2025, 09/16/2025, 10/14/2025, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-10-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents) was updated to accurately determine and identify the resources needed for the facility's resident care needs. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility assessment, updated on 06/14/2024, showed the assessment did not address or include the following: - Resources necessary to care for residents including nights and weekends, - Contracts, memorandums of understanding ([NAME]), or other agreements with third parties to provide services or equipment to the facility during both normal operations and emergencies, - Consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and adjust as necessary based on changes to its resident population. - Consider specific staffing needs for each shift, such as day, evening, night,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP — 19 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 18 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMPRES WASHINGTON HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2025 |
| CLAWSON, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2025 |
| EMPRES HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2025 |
| EMPRES HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2025 |
| MILLER, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| WEIL, BRENT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| WILLIAMS, RYAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| EMPRES HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| KAPALUA BEACH, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| TRAVERS, TARA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| WILL, DUANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2025 |
| KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/27/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505500. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.