No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Health Care Ctr At The Forum At Rancho San Antonio

23600 Via Esplendor, Cupertino, CA 95014 · Non profit - Other · 48 certified beds · (650) 944-0200 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (650) 944-0200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(650) 328-8505 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.3 mi
2310 Homestead Rd Ste A · (408) 774-0134 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Lucky1.0 mi
2175 Grant Rd · (650) 969-1326 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
23000 Cristo Rey Dr · (650) 386-4342

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.1%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.4%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.992.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.721.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 181 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.75U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 162 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.7%CMS range 56.3–68.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.5–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 3.1–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
28.8%
Total nursing turnover
27.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.32 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.94 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's legal representative (LR) who was Resident 1's son ( LR, is an individual authorized under state law to act on behalf of a resident in a facility, such as a nursing home or assisted living. They manage affairs, make decisions, or access information. including court-appointed guardians, conservators, or agents under a power of attorney) had the rights to exercise the resident's rights for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when his documentation of Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD , is a legal document that outlines your medical treatment preferences-such as life-sustaining care-if you become too sick or injured to communicate them yourself ) was not verified and implemented when Resident 1's representative had been delegated authority to make health care decisions for Resident 1 immediately as stipulated in the Advanced Directive dated 5/31/22 . This failure potentially limited the legal representative of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of their rights upon admission, when the admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities was not completed for one of three residents (Resident 1 affected). This deficient practice resulted in the resident not being informed of his rights. Findings: Review of Resident 1's Face sheet (a summary document containing a Resident's personal and demographic information, including contact details and medical history) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, an ongoing lung condition caused by damaged lungs), Essential Hypertension (increase in blood pressure), Hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland does not make enough thyroid hormone), other viral infections. Review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a standardized cognitive screening tool used primarily in long-term care facilities to assess a resident's cognitive function), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and equipment was maintained in accordance with professional standards for food safety when undated food items, food past their discard by date, uncovered food, rotten vegetables, and old, chipped, worn-out equipment were found in the kitchen.These failures had the potential to cause the growth of micro-organisms which could cause foodborne illness and cross-contaminated food for the 44 residents eating at the facility, with one resident on tube feeding and still eating lunch.Findings:On 1/26/26, at 9:10 a.m., during an observation of the kitchen with executive chef E (EC E), the following were observed: a. One pure [NAME] maple syrup with discard by dated 1/23/26b. One opened and undated Tamari soy saucec. Five cooked beets with discard by dated 1/25/26d. One [NAME] Caesar dressing with discard by dated 1/3/26e. One opened and undated Dijon mustardf. One opened and undated bag of frozen onion ringg. Three butter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 14 residents (Resident 51, 17 and 59) had been informed about having an advance directive (AD, legal form directing their wishes about their healthcare, whether from them or a named individual on their behalf), when no documentation was found about AD and the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a legal document stating the kind of medical treatment residents want toward the end of their lives) were not completed and not readily available in the event of a medical emergency.This failure had the potential to result in inability to make medical decisions and could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services.Findings:Review of Resident 51's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Covid-19 (highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue that leads to the release of toxic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 out of 5 sampled residents (Residents 1, 35, and 51) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when:1. Resident 1 received trazodone (an antidepressant) for insomnia without side effect monitoring and without adequate monitoring when staff did not monitor the quantity (hours) of sleep to evaluate whether the medication was effective for her insomnia.2. Resident 35 received trazodone for insomnia without adequate monitoring for hours of sleep.3. Resident 51's as-needed (PRN) order for trazodone did not have a 14-day end date, as required.The failures resulted in inadequate and ineffective monitoring for side effects and effectiveness of psychotropic medications.1. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and insomnia (inability to sleep). A review of the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives, goals, and interventions, was developed and implemented for 4 out of 14 sampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 38, and 52), when:1. Resident 1 did not have care plans for migraine and insomnia;2. Resident 38 did not have a care plan related to use of apixaban (Eliquis, an anticoagulant - or blood thinner- to prevent blood clots) and osteoporosis (a bone disease causing weak, brittle bones due to decreased bone mass). 3. Resident 3 did not have a care plan developed for pressure ulcer; and4. Resident 52 did not have a care plan for the use of urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine).This failure placed the residents at risk of not being provided appropriate, consistent, and individualized care for their medical conditions. 1. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including migraine with aura (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for one of 5 residents (29) when license nurses did not administer pain medication to Resident 29 according to the pain level ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience avoidable pain and could negatively affect their quality of life.Findings:Review of Resident 29's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pain in left knee and gout (characterized by sudden, severe attacks of pain, swelling, redness and tenderness in one or more joints, most often in the big toe) diagnoses.Review of Resident 29's physician order, dated 2/11/25, indicated he had an order for acetaminophen (a drug that reduces pain and fever) 325 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed for mild pain level 1-4.Review of Resident 29's Medication Administration Record (MAR), from 9/2025 to 1/2026, indicated two tablets of acetaminophen 325 mg were administered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (those with a high abuse potential) records were complete and fully accounted when:1. Drug disposition records conducted on [DATE] did not have a registered nurse's (RN's) signature to show the controlled medications were disposed of (destroyed) by a pharmacist and an RN, as required.2. Controlled medication use audit for three out of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 56, and 58) did not reconcile. The residents' controlled medications were signed out of the Controlled Drugs Records (CDR, inventory record of controlled drugs) but not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, record of medications administered to a resident) to indicate they were administered to the residents. The failure resulted in inaccurate accountability and incomplete disposition records which had the potential for abuse and diversion (unlawful distribution or use) of controlled medications.1. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility and the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to ensure the pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations were acted upon/responded to on a timely basis. The CP's recommendations from November 2025 through January 2026 were delayed, resulting untimely response for 4 out of 14 sampled residents (Residents 1, 10, 29, and 38). For Resident 10, CP's recommendation for a dose change of aspirin was not acted on timely. For Resident 1, the recommendation for trazodone (an antidepressant) side effect monitoring was not acted on and carried out timely. For resident 38, the anticoagulant (a blood thinner to prevent blood clot) dose change recommendation was not acted on and carried out timely. For Resident 29, the recommendation to initiate routine acetaminophen (Tylenol) for better pain management was not acted on and carried out timely.The failure resulted in unnecessary medications for the residents including inadequate doses (too high or low) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 out of 14 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 38) were free from unnecessary medications when:1. Resident 38 received apixaban (Eliquis, an anticoagulant - or blood thinner- to prevent blood clots) at a dose higher than manufacturer's recommendation for her diagnosis, age, and weight without the risk/benefit assessment from the physician. This had the potential for the resident to suffer from adverse effects (such as bruising, bleeding) from anticoagulant use.2. The nursing staff did not monitor for signs and symptoms of related to apixaban use for Resident 38. This had the potential for untimely recognition and interventions for adverse effects from anticoagulant use.3. Resident 7 received torsemide (a medication to lower blood pressure and treat fluid retention) without hold parameters (such as to hold when blood pressure is low). This had the potential for the medication to be administered when the resident's blood pressure is low, leading…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served to the residents were at acceptable temperature. This failure had the potential to impact on the residents' nutritional status and not meet the residents' desires.Findings:During an interview with Resident 61 on 1/26/26, at 11:14 a.m., she stated the hot food was not hot.During an observation and interview with the director of hospitality and nutrition (DHN) on the test tray on 1/28/26, at 12:35 p.m., the brisket, the macaroni and cheese, and the burger were at 117.9 Fahrenheit (F, a scale of temperature), 121F, and 116.9F. The DHN confirmed these hot food temperatures.During an interview with the DHN on 1/30/26, at 11:15 a.m., he stated the facility did not have the policy on food temperature served at the residents' tables.During an interview with Resident 60 on 1/30/26, at 1:04 p.m., he stated the food was cold; the hot food was not hot; the coffee in the morning was cold; the eggs, bacon, and sausages were cold when they came to his room.Review of the facility's Food and Nutrition: Test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention techniques were followed when:1. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illness) when he entered the room of a Covid-19 (highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) positive resident (Resident 51);2. The Registered Nurse (RN) B failed to change gloves during tube feeding (liquid nutrients given through a tube inserted in the stomach) for Resident 2;3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C used the same tissue to wipe excess liquid from both eyes during the administration of three different eye medications for Resident 4; and4. Certified Nursing Assistant F (CNA F) did not perform hand washing or hand hygiene before feeding Resident 18.These deficient practices had the potential for contamination and spread of infection.Findings: 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat one of 14 residents (23) with respect and dignity when certified nursing assistant D (CNA D) was standing while feeding Resident 23 in his room. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 23 feeling low self-esteem.Findings:During a dining observation on 1/26/26, at 12:57 p.m., CNA D was standing while feeding lunch to Resident 23 in his room.During a concurrent interview with CNA D, she stated she was standing and feeding Resident 23 because she was short. CNA D acknowledged that she could position Resident 23's bed lower, so that she could sit on a chair and feed the resident.Review of the facility's policy, Assistance with Meals, dated 3/2022, indicated . 3. Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, for example: a. Not standing over residents while assisting them with meals; .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement comprehensive care plan that included measurable objectives and interventions for one out of 14 sampled residents (Resident 33) when Resident 33's foley catheter (a device inserted into the bladder [organ that collects urine] to drain urine, made of a semi-flexible plastic tube) care plan was not revised or updated after the intervention failed. The failure had the potential for Resident 33 not attaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.During a review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including urinary retention. A review of Resident 33's physician's order dated, 1/1/26 indicated an order for Foley Catheter 16Fr (French, size is comparable to the circumference of the catheter in millimeters) due to diagnosis of urinary retention change per MD (Medical Doctor) schedule and prn (as needed) obstruction. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services were provided to one of three residents (41) when Resident 41's pacemaker (a small battery-operated device that helps the heart beats in a regular rhythm) information was not in his medical records. This failure had the potential for not preventing Resident 41 from experiencing serious health conditions.Findings:Review of Resident 41's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots, heart failure, and other heart-related complications), and presence of cardiac pacemaker diagnoses.Review of Resident 41's clinical record indicated that his pacemaker information such as manufacturer, model, serial number, date implanted, name of cardiologist, etc. was not found.During an interview with the director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess fall risk for one of three residents (36) when Resident 36 had not had quarterly fall risk assessment since after 5/28/25. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 36's fall risk and fall intervention were not up to date to prevent her from falling and getting injury.Findings:Review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with abnormalities of gait and mobility diagnosis.Review of Resident 36's Nursing Progress Note, dated 5/28/25, at 9:50 p.m., indicated on 5/28/25, at 4:30 p.m., Resident 36 went from her wheelchair to stand and transfer to the walker in the dining room. Resident 36 lost balance and fell onto her left side.Review of Resident 36's clinical records indicated Resident 36 was assessed for fall risk when she fell on 5/28/25. However, there were no fall risk assessments done for Resident 36 after 5/28/25.During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 1/30/26, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of bed rails (side rails, adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) for one of nine residents (Resident 2) with side rails when there was no documented evidence that the bed rail entrapment risk assessment was completed.This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of entrapment and serious injury.Findings:Review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke; a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type II diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood).During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 1/29/26 at 9:00 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sample residents (Resident 1) when: 1. The facility scheduled a change in medication administration time to start on 7/17/24 when it should have started on 7/18/24; and, 2. A medication was documented as administered when it should have been documented as refused. These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated she had a physician's order, dated 7/8/24, for lisinopril (medication used to lower blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement) three tablets (total of 15 mg) by mouth one time a day for hypertension. From 7/9/24 to 7/17/24, this medication was scheduled to be administered at 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 11 resident (Residents 3, 13, 24, 334, and 336) had: 1. documentation of reviewing advance directive status, when there was no documentation of a staff member discussing the status with four of the residents or residents' representative, or 2. the POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) for three residents, were not filled in accurately, when Section D had no check marks for the advance directive status. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 13's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 13 was admitted to facility on 3/4/2019. Review of Resident 13's POLST form dated 11/1/2022 indicated, section D for advance directive (AD)'s all three options were left blank, not completed. Review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated there was no document for advance directive. Further review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated there was no documented evidence for facility discussed for AD or offered help to execute AD or requested copy of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications in medication room when the following were found: 1. An expired over the counter (OTC: medications can buy without written by medical doctor) medications; 2. An expired suppositories (supp: solid, small, and cone shaped medications that melts upon insertion into the body). These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced efficacy (effectiveness). Findings: 1. During an observation of facility's medication room (where facility stores medications) along with director of nursing (DON) on 7/18/2024 at 7:59 a.m., observed one container of psyllium powder (fiber supplement to help with digestive health and bowel regularity) expired on 6/2024. One bottle of geri-lanta (used to treat for stomach upset) expired on 5/2024, and one bottle of milk of magnesia (used to treat for stomach upset or indigestion [stomach discomfort after eating food]) expired on 6/2024. These expired medications were stored in OTC medication supply cabinet in medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Bowls used for food preparation and food service were stacked and stored wet; 2. There were undated and outdated food items in the facility's kitchen freezer; These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 38 of 39 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 8:55 a.m., there were 3 large metal bowls and one small metal bowl observed to be stacked on a metal wire rack. The bowls were stacked upside down on top of one another and were wet inside and outside of the bowl's surfaces. During a concurrent interview with the certified dietary manager (CDM), he confirmed the bowls were stacked wet and he stated they should be air dried before being stacked and stored. Review of the facility's policy titled Dishwashing Machine Use revised March 2010, indicated The following guidelines will be followed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Foley catheter ((F/C: a semi-flexible plastic tube, one end inserted into bladder (a body organ that stores urine] and the other end attached to a bag that collects urine)'s tubing (hard plastic tube attached between F/C and F/C's drain bag [urine collection bag] to drain urine from body) laying on floor for Resident 332; 2. Nasal Cannula (NC: a medical device to provide supplemental oxygen [O2: colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas supports life] to residents) tubes on floor and unchanged for Resident 334; 3. Licensed nurse failed to do hand hygiene after removing gloves; and 4. Phlebotomist (PHMT: person responsible to take samples of blood from residents for testing) was in the hallway with gloves on. These failures could result in the spread of infections and cross-contamination that could affect all the residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 332's face sheet (FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to treat with dignity and privacy for 1 of 2 sampled Resident (Resident 332) when: 1. Resident 332's foley catheter (F/C: a semi-flexible plastic tube, one end inserted into bladder [ a body organ that stores urine] and the other end attached to a bag that collects urine) drain bag (collects urine that drains through the F/C) was left uncovered. These failure had the potential for adverse effects on the psychosocial well-being and health of Resident 332. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 332's face sheet ((FS: a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 332 was admitted to facility on 7/9/224. Review of Resident 332's admission diagnoses included fracture of superior rim of left pubis (broken bone in pelvis (basin shaped complex of bones that connects the trunk and legs of the body)]. Review of Resident 332's physician order dated 7/9/2024 indicated, Foley Catheter Fr.16 (F/C size) due to diagnosis ---change per MD (medical doctor) schedule and PRN (as needed)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give notice of ending of Medicare Part A stay or therapies under Part B within a timely manner to one of three randomly selected residents (Resident 26). This failure had the potential for Resident 26 not being able to appeal for continued payment by Medicare. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Notification Review (SNF BNR), dated 5/23/2024, the SNF BNR indicated Resident 26's Medicare part A Skilled Services last day of coverage was 5/23/2024. The date Resident 26's SNF BNR was signed was 5/23/2024. During an interview on 7/18/24 at 10:57 a.m. with the administrator (ADM), ADM stated Resident 26's last day covered was 5/23/24, and the SNF BNR notice was given on 5/23/24. ADM stated Resident 26 should have had 48 hours between giving notice and their last day of coverage. It was not done in this situation. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Health Information Record Manual: Chapter VII 7020 Medicare Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage/Advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) was accurate for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 19). For Resident 19, the assessment of his alarm device was inaccurate and the MDS did not reflect the presence of a wanderguard (a device that activates an alarm when a resident attempts to leave a safe area.) Failure to accurately assess Resident 19's use of a wanderguard had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop and implement resident-centered care plans and interventions. Findings: Review of Resident 19's clinical record indicated he had diagnoses including dementia (decline in mental capacity affecting daily function), history of falling, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 19's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated he had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS, an assessment to test a person's cognition level) score of 3 [a score of 0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 8-12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement their elopement risk care plan (a written document which communicates and directs the care and services, including goals and interventions required to meet a resident's individualized need) for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for Resident 19's attempts at elopement to go undetected and jeopardize Resident 19's safety. Findings: Review of Resident 19's clinical record indicated he had diagnoses including dementia (decline in mental capacity affecting daily function), history of falling, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 19's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated he had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 (a score of 0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 19's clinical notes, dated 8/3/23, indicated an attempted elopement (leaving unsupervised and undetected) occurred by Resident 19. The clinical notes indicated an ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for medication order for one of five sampled resident (Resident 340) when; 1. Resident 340 received medication pantoprazole sodium delayed release (used to reduce amount of acid in stomach to release the active ingredient (s) later after taking it) after breakfast. This failure had the potential to affect the health and well-being of Resident 340. Findings: Review of Resident 340 face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 340 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 340's physician orders dated 7/6/2024 indicated, pantoprazole Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 40 mg (pantoprazole Sodium) Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for every morning before breakfast. Review of Resident 340's minimum data set (MDS: clinical assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 340 brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to administer oxygen (O2: colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas supports life) for 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident 24). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 24's health, and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 24's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident's admission diagnoses including transient ischemic attack (a condition caused by brief blockage of blood flow to the brain), thrombocytosis [blood has a higher-than-normal platelet (particles in blood that help the blood to become gel to manage bleeding) count], and atherosclerotic heart disease (a sticky substance called plaque builds up inside arteries [blood vessels carry blood from heart to body organs]). Review of Resident 24's physician orders for dated 6/23/2024 indicated, Oxygen: Administer 5 LPM (liters per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine if bed rails were appropriate for two of 39 resident (Residents 17 and 81) prior to installing them. This failure had the potential of the residents being harmed from improper bed rail use. Findings: During a review of the medical record for Resident 17, a bed rail assessment was not located. Nor was the alternatives used, a physician order, or a care plan for their use, prior to installation. During a review of the medical record for Resident 81, neither a bed rail assessment, the alternatives used, a physician order, or a care plan for their use, prior to installation, were not located. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 2:28 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated Residents 17 and 81 do not have a physician order, assessment, alternatives attempted documented, nor a care plan. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised 08/2022, indicated under the sub-heading Use of Bed Rails .3. The use of bed rails or side rails .is prohibited unless the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing hours in a prominent place. This failure did not follow the federal regulation of posting them in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During an observation of the nurses station during the time of the survey, the posting for the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff total number and actual hours worked was not located. During an interview on 7/19/24 at 9:29 a.m. with the administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the nursing numbers are posted in the hallway that is blocked off right now because of constriction and painting. After the surveyor brought it to the ADM's attention, the ADM stated let me get those moved.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident 339) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when; 1. No target behavior monitoring for use of medication quetiapine (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders); 2. No non-pharmacological (any type of healthcare interventions without use of medications) approaches to minimize the need to use for medication quetiapine; 3. Pharmacy consultant (expertise in managing medications and providing clinical guidance on safe and appropriate medication use for residents)'s recommendations for quetiapine had not been followed up and; 4. MD (medical doctor)'s response for pharmacy recommendations had not been followed up. These failures resulted in inadequate monitoring and unnecessary medication for Resident 339, which potentially placed the resident at risk for experiencing harmful adverse effects from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled appropriately when: 1. Two unlabeled and opened bottles of Di-Dak-Sol diluted Dakin's solution (used to treat or prevent infections caused by cuts or abrasions, skin ulcers, pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, or surgery), and one unlabeled opened hydrocortisone cream 1% -topical (used to help relieve redness, itching, swelling, or other discomfort caused by skin conditions) were found in the treatment cart; 2. An expired and opened Fluocinolone acetonide Topical solution USP, 0.01% (used to reduce skin inflammation and relieve itching) and an expired opened Normal Saline solution (NSS) 100 milliliters (ml, a unit of measurement for volume) (mixture of sodium chloride in water and applied to the affected area or used to clean wounds) were inside the treatment cart; 3. One opened bottle of Doxazosin Mesylate (used in men to treat the symptoms of an enlarged prostate) in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. A scoop was inside the dry legume container in the dry storage area; 2. There were opened, undated, unlabeled, and outdated food items in the food preparation and dry storage areas; 3. There were opened, undated, and unlabeled food items in the walk-in refrigerator; 4. There were undated, and unlabeled food items in the walk-in freezer. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 22 of 22 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 6/5/23 at 8:25 a.m., accompanied by the director of dining services (DDS), the following observations were made in the facility's kitchen: 1. Inside the kitchen's dry storage area there was a plastic bin containing dry legumes with a scoop inside the bin. The scoop was touching the legumes. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper infection control practices when: 1. The licensed nurse did not change gloves between tasks; 2. Registered Nurse D (RN D) did not perform hand hygiene in between procedures; 3. Resident 127's spirometer (an apparatus for measuring the volume of air inspired and expired by the lungs- measures ventilation, the movement of air into and out of the lungs) mouthpiece was touching the side table; 4. Trash can attached to the Medication Cart B has used facial mask and N-95; 5. Three medication containers inside the medication room refrigerator has grayish substance, and disposal container for discontinued and refused medication had red spots of liquid substance inside the medication room; 6. There was a grayish powder seen in the first drawer of the treatment cart. 7. The Medication Cart A had a bottle of Milk of Magnesia oral- MOM (a laxative to relieve occasional constipation and used as an antacid to relieve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet the professional standard of practice for one of four residents (Resident 6) who had a pacemaker (implanted device for a heart condition, a battery-powered device implanted inside the heart to restore a normal heartbeat) when: 1. The resident's medical record had no pacemaker-paced rate information, 2. The licensed nurse did not develop a care plan to manage pacemaker care. These failures had the potential to compromise Resident 6's health and safety. Findings: A review of Resident 6's clinical records indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and a pacemaker was implanted on 5/25/2022. During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A on 6/8/2023, at 3:17 p.m., LVN A confirmed Resident 6's medical record had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 17) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when Resident 17 received Lorazepam (anxiolytic medication, used to reduce anxity)without a stop date. The failure had the potential to result in inadequate use of psychotropic medications. Findings: A review of Resident 17's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with the patient's daily life), anxiety, and depression. A review of Resident 17's physician's orders dated 5/19/2023 indicated administering Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement)1 tablet orally every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety manifested by restlessness. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFE CARE SERVICES — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Burcham Hills Retirement CenterEast Lansing, MI 1 of 5Cottage Grove PlaceCedar Rapids, IA 2 of 5Casa De Las CampanasSan Diego, CA 2 of 5Linn Manor Care CenterMarion, IA 2 of 5Oakton Place Health And Rehabilitation At The ArliNaples, FL 2 of 5Pavilion At Brandon WildeEvans, GA 2 of 5Signature PointeDallas, TX 2 of 5The Stewart Health CenterCharlotte, NC 3 of 5Carillon INCLubbock, TX 3 of 5Friendship Village Of TempeTempe, AZ 3 of 5Westminster Village - West LafayetteWest Lafayette, IN 4 of 5Croasdaile VillageDurham, NC 4 of 5Dallas Retirement Village Health CenterDallas, OR 4 of 5Oaks Health Ctr At The Marshes Of Skidaway IslandSavannah, GA 4 of 5Parkwood VillageBedford, TX 4 of 5The Cedars of Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC 4 of 5Wesley Pines Retirement CommunityLumberton, NC 4 of 5Whitestone a Masonic and Eastern Star CommunityGreensboro, NC 5 of 5Acacia Health CenterPhoenix, AZ 5 of 5Avalon Health Care Center At StoneridgeMystic, CT 5 of 5Briarwood At Timber RidgeIssaquah, WA 5 of 5Chestnut Grn Hlth Ctr BlakehurTowson, MD 5 of 5Cypress Glen Retirement CommunityGreenville, NC 5 of 5Eastcastle Pl Bradford Ter Conv CtrMilwaukee, WI 5 of 5Essex Meadows Health CenterEssex, CT 5 of 5Friendship VillageKalamazoo, MI 5 of 5Green Hills Health Care CenterAmes, IA 5 of 5Greenwood Village SouthGreenwood, IN 5 of 5Hearthwood SNF Senior LivingBartlett, IL 5 of 5MarquetteIndianapolis, IN 5 of 5Premier Place At The GlenviewNaples, FL 5 of 5Radford GreenLincolnshire, IL 5 of 5Residences At Vantage PointColumbia, MD 5 of 5Rolling Green VillageGreenville, SC 5 of 5Somerfield At The HeritageBrentwood, TN 5 of 5Springs At Monarch Landing, TheNaperville, IL 5 of 5Terraces At The ClareChicago, IL 5 of 5The Arbour At Westminster ManorAustin, TX 5 of 5The Birches At Trillium WoodsPlymouth, MN 5 of 5The Preston Health CenterHilton Head Island, SC

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RANCHO SAN ANTONIO RETIREMENT HOUSING CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/31/1992
EXLINE, RICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
JOHNSON, EIKOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAUMAN, SHARONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2020
BROWN, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
BUSH, ELLYNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
FISHBEIN, MARGERYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
LIFE CARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025
JO, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
KAO, NANCYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2000
NELSON, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 6%Other / private 94%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$623per resident / day
operating cost
$18,925per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$510per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555524. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next